Editorials |
From the Division of Gene Therapy Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.
Correspondence to Ryuichi Morishita, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Division of Gene Therapy, Osaka University Medical School, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565, Japan. E-mail morishit{at}geriat.med.osaka-u.ac.jp\\ © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Key Words: central nervous system stroke gene therapy blood-brain barrier subarachnoid hemorrhage
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Novel Therapeutic Strategy to Treat Vasospasm After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH) |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Similarly, overexpression of endothelial nitric oxide
synthase gene using an adenoviral vector also prevented angiopathy
(vasospasm) after
SAH.8 9
Alternatively, the introduction into target cells of synthetic
double-stranded DNA with high affinity for a target transcription
factor, as a decoy cis element, has been
proposed.10 Using
the decoy strategy, Ono et
al11 reported that
transfection of nuclear factor-
B decoy oligodeoxynucleotides into
the subarachnoid space prevented angiopathy after SAH in a rabbit model
using virus-liposome methods. These results clearly demonstrate the
possibility of treating SAH using recombinant genes or
oligodeoxynucleotides. Nevertheless, gene therapy still requires
efficient in vivo gene transfer technology to achieve the final goal.
During the past decade, many gene transfer methods have been developed,
and some are being applied clinically in human gene therapy studies. In
vivo gene transfer techniques for cardiovascular applications include
(1) viral gene transfer with retrovirus, adenovirus, or HVJ
(hemagglutinating virus of Japan, Sendai virus), (2) liposomal gene
transfer with cationic liposomes, and (3) naked plasmid DNA transfer.
These techniques have different advantages and disadvantages.
Adenovirus-mediated transfer is a promising gene transfer method for
the treatment of cardiovascular disease, as the adenoviral method is
very effective for transfection into nonreplicating cells including
vascular cells. The expression is temporary (weeks to months),
suggesting that this transfer method may be particularly useful for
treatment of self-limited diseases such as vasospasm after SAH, in
which only temporary expression of the transgene is needed. However,
for transfection into the central nervous system, adenovirus-mediated
gene transfer is limited due to inflammatory changes. This undesirable
adverse effect is particularly challenging for effective human gene
therapy. Thus, further modification of vectors should be considered for
human gene therapy in the central nervous system.
| Adventure of Gene Therapy Into the Brain |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Angiogenesis can be promoted in the rat brain using adenoviral vectors containing cDNA from basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), a well-known angiogenic factor.12 After intraventricular administration of the viral vector, bFGF gene transfer induced angiogenesis in normal rat brain accompanied by an extremely high concentration of bFGF in the CSF. In addition to bFGF and VEGF, hepatocyte growth factor, a potent angiogenic growth factor, might be useful to treat ischemic cerebrovascular disease.13 Stimulation of new vessel formation by angiogenic growth factors is likely to create new therapeutic options in angiogenesis-dependent conditions such as stroke, Moyamoya disease, and dementia, although a number of important issues, such as safety and side effects, have not yet been addressed.
Although it may be feasible to treat these diseases using recombinant proteins rather than nucleic acids, gene therapy has several potential advantages over protein therapy. (1) Gene therapy has the potential to maintain an optimally high and local concentration over time. This issue may be critical in the case of arterial gene therapy. In addition, in the case of therapeutic angiogenesis, it may be preferable to deliver a lower dose over a period of several days or more from an actively expressed transgene in the artery, rather than a single or multiple bolus doses of recombinant protein, to avoid side effects. (2) Regarding economics, which therapy would ultimately cost more to develop, implement, and reimburse, particularly for those indications requiring multiple or even protracted treatment, needs to be considered. (3) The feasibility of a clinical trial of recombinant protein is currently limited by the lack of approved or available quantities of clinical-grade recombinant protein, due in large part to the nearly prohibitive cost of scaling up from research-grade to human-quality recombinant protein. Moreover, the central nervous system is relatively inaccessible to circulating proteins and peptides, because an anatomical barrier (blood-brain barrier) exists to prevent the clinical utility of vasodilators such as CGRP or angiogenic growth factors such as bFGF. Given that the molecular size of numerous agents is too large to penetrate the blood-brain barrier, these agents seem to be ineffective without direct and continuous injection into the ventricle, striatum, or cerebral cortex by a surgical technique. From the standpoint of clinical use, it is clear that these methods are less useful compared with gene transfer into the cisterna magna, because they entail surgical insult and prolonged endurance for the patient. Indeed, previous studies used the infusion of recombinant protein continuously into the brain or the subarachnoid space, whose manipulation is risky in clinical situations. Such a procedure is necessary because of the rapid disappearance of recombinant factors into surrounding tissue.
| Perspectives in Gene Therapy for Treatment of Cerebrovascular Disease |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Baumgartner
I, Pieczek A, Manor O, Blair R, Kearney M, Walsh K, Isner JM.
Constitutive expression of phVEGF165 after
intramuscular gene transfer promotes collateral vessel development in
patients with critical limb ischemia. Circulation. 1998;97:11141123.
3.
Losordo
DW, Vale PR, Symes JF, Dunnington CH, Esakof DD, Maysky M, Ashare AB,
Lathi K, Isner JM. Gene therapy for myocardial angiogenesis: initial
clinical results with direct myocardial injection of
phVEGF165 as sole therapy for myocardial
ischemia. Circulation. 1998;98:28002804.
4.
Vale PR,
Losordo DW, Milliken CE, Maysky M, Esakof DD, Symes JF, Isner JM. Left
ventricular electromechanical mapping to assess efficacy of
phVEGF165 gene transfer for therapeutic
angiogenesis in chronic myocardial ischemia.
Circulation. 2000;102:965974.
5.
Toyoda
K, Faraci FM, Watanabe Y, Ueda T, Andresen JJ, Chu Y, Otake S, Heistad
DD. Gene transfer of calcitonin generelated peptide prevents
vasoconstriction after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Circ
Res. 2000;87:818824.
6.
Hongo K,
Tsukahara T, Kassell NF, Ogawa H. Effect of subarachnoid hemorrhage on
calcitonin gene-related peptide-induced relaxation in rabbit basilar
artery. Stroke. 1989;20:100104.
7. Nelson MT, Huang Y, Brayden JE, Hescheler J, Standen NB. Arterial dilations in response to calcitonin gene-related peptide involve activation of K+ channels. Nature. 1990;344:770773.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Chen
AFY, Jiang SW, Crotty TB, Tsutsui M, Smith LA, OBrien T, Katusic ZS.
Effects of in vivo adventitial expression of recombinant endothelial
nitric oxide synthase gene in cerebral arteries. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A. 1997;94:1256812573.
9.
Onoue H,
Tsutsui M, Smith L, Stelter A, OBrien T, Katusic ZS. Expression and
function of recombinant endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene in
canine basilar artery after experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Stroke. 1998;29:19591965.
10.
Morishita
R, Higaki J, Tomita N, Ogihara T. Application of transcription factor
"decoy" strategy as means of gene therapy and study of gene
expression in cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 1998;82:10231028.
11.
Ono S,
Date I, Onoda K, Shiota T, Ohmoto T, Ninomiya Y, Asari S, Morishita R.
Decoy administration of NF
B into the subarachnoid space for cerebral
angiopathy. Hum Gene Ther. 1998;9:10031011.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Yukawa H, Takahashi JC, Miyatake SI, Saiki M, Matsuoka N, Akimoto M, Yanamoto H, Nagata I, Kikuchi H, Hashimoto N. Adenoviral gene transfer of basic fibroblast growth factor promotes angiogenesis in rat brain. Gene Ther. 2000;7:942949.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Hayashi S, Morishita R, Nakamura S, Yamamoto K, Moriguchi A, Nagano T, Taiji M, Noguchi H, Matsumoto K, Nakamura T, Higaki J, Ogihara T. Potential role of hepatocyte growth factor, a novel angiogenic growth factor, in peripheral arterial disease: downregulation of HGF in response to hypoxia in vascular cells. Circulation. 1999 (suppl);100:II-301II-308.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |