Editorial |
From the Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Correspondence to Edward E. Morrisey, PhD, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 953 BRB II/III, 421 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail emorrise{at}mail.med.upenn.edu
Key Words: cyclin-dependant kinase inhibitors transcription factors cell cycle differentiation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
GATA-6 belongs to a family of zinc finger transcription factors that have been implicated in various developmental processes, including cell differentiation and proliferation. In this issue of Circulation Research, Nagata et al1 report that overexpression of GATA-6 in glomerular mesangial cells (GMCs) results in decreased cell proliferation and posttranscriptional upregulation of p21cip1, a cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) inhibitor. This finding is especially interesting in light of recent reports showing that GATA-6 regulates cell proliferation via p21cip1 in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs).2 Thus, the present study details a new region of expression for GATA-6 (glomerular mesangial cells) coupled with an important emerging function (regulation of cell proliferation).
All GATA factors activate transcription by binding to the
consensus DNA sequence WGATAR (where W is T or A and R is G or
A).3 4 On the basis of both their amino acid sequence
homologies and respective patterns of expression, the 6 vertebrate GATA
factors have been classified into 2 subfamilies. Members of the
GATA-1/-2/-3 subfamily are known to be important regulators of
hematopoietic cell growth and differentiation.5 In
addition, GATA-1 has been shown to regulate erythroid cell
proliferation, whereas GATA-2 seems to regulate multipotential
hematopoietic progenitor cell proliferation.6 7 GATA-6 was
originally characterized as a member of the GATA-4/-5/-6 subfamily of
GATA factors, which are expressed in the developing heart and are able
to transactivate cardiac-specific promoters, such as cardiac
troponin C, atrial natriuretic factor, and
-myosin heavy
chain, in vitro.8 Recent reports of mice containing null
mutations for GATA-4 and -6 have shown that these factors are essential
for formation of the midline heart tube from precardiac mesoderm and
differentiation of the visceral endoderm in the mouse,
respectively.9 10 11 Although a great deal has been learned
about the roles that GATA factors play during development from gene
knockout experiments, much is still not understood about the molecular
targets and mechanisms by which these factors influence tissue
development, cell differentiation, and proliferation.
Excessive proliferation of GMCs is associated with glomerulonephritis, which, in extreme cases, can lead to renal hypertension. Therefore, the ability to control GMC proliferation would be of great potential therapeutic value in the treatment of this disease. Although in recent years there have been many reports characterizing the mechanisms of GMC proliferation, very little is known about the tissue-specific regulation of growth and proliferation in these cells. However, from these studies, two different and widely expressed transcription factors have emerged as important regulators of GMC proliferation: early response growth factor-1 (Egr-1) and E2F1. Egr-1 is a zinc finger transcription factor that is induced under a variety of mitogenic signals and during differentiation of certain cell lineages.12 Treatment of GMCs with antisense oligonucleotide directed against Egr-1 inhibits cell proliferation by up to 46%.13 In addition, stimulation of nitric oxide production in GMCs inhibited their growth by disrupting the ability of Egr-1 to bind to DNA.14 Together, these data suggest that Egr-1 probably plays a direct and positive role in regulating GMC growth and proliferation. E2F1 has also been implicated in regulating cell proliferation in GMCs. E2F proteins bind to the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor family, and, in this complex, they remain inactive. Phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein releases and activates E2F proteins that then induce target genes essential for the G1- to S-phase transition of the cell cycle.15 Members of the E2F family regulate the expression of a variety of cell cycle genes, including cdk2, c-myb, c-myc, and proliferating cell nuclear antigen. In addition, E2F1 binding sites are found in the promoters of other cell cycledependent genes, such as cyclin D1 and E, additionally supporting its role as a regulator of cell cycle progression.15 The level of E2F1 protein is undetectable in quiescent GMCs but increases dramatically after serum stimulation, reaching a maximum at 24 hours.16 In addition, overexpression of E2F1 in rat GMCs results in an increase of thymidine uptake of up to 250%, with a subsequent increase in cell proliferation.17 These data indicate that the E2F family, in particular E2F1, plays an important role in GMC cell cycle regulation by promoting the progression of cells through the G1/S transition. Although the results described here with Egr-1 and E2F1 are intriguing, one must keep in mind that both of these transcription factors are expressed ubiquitously and have been demonstrated to affect proliferation in many other cell types. Consequently, any therapy based on inhibiting these proteins would most likely have severe deleterious effects on other cells and tissues. Therefore, transcription factors (or other cell cycle regulatory proteins) that are more tissue-restricted may provide better targets for regulating GMC growth and proliferation.
Because GMCs share many similarities with VSMCs, as Nagata et al1 correctly point out in their study, a discussion of the mechanisms of cell proliferation in VSMCs is beneficial to understanding GMC proliferation. There has been great interest in characterizing the mechanisms of VSMC proliferation, because this is a major cause of arterial occlusion after vessel injury. From several studies over the past few years, the transcription factors Gax and GATA-6 have emerged as candidate regulators of VSMC proliferation. Gax was originally identified as a homeodomain protein expressed at high levels in nonproliferating VSMCs whose expression decreased dramatically on entry of these cells into the cell cycle.18 Later reports showed that forced expression of Gax inhibited cell proliferation in both VSMCs and fibroblasts, indicating that Gax may have a general antiproliferative effect in cells other than VSMCs.19 Whether Gax is expressed in GMCs is not known, but this should be investigated due to its role in VSMC proliferation. The expression of GATA-6 also decreases dramatically on entry of VSMCs into the cell cycle, and, like Gax, forced expression of GATA-6 in VSMCs results in decreased cell proliferation.2 Interestingly, the inhibition of cell proliferation demonstrated by both Gax and GATA-6 seems to be mediated by p21cip1, because p21cip1-deficient fibroblasts were not affected by overexpression of either transcription factor. In addition, overexpression of Gax or GATA-6 induced cell cycle arrest in p53-deficient fibroblasts, indicating that they directly modulate the expression of p21cip1 independent of p53, which itself can activate p21cip1.
These reports suggest that Gax and GATA-6 may be involved in the modulation of VSMC differentiation and, by association, GMC differentiation. VSMCs are able to modulate their phenotype by dedifferentiating from the contractile nonproliferative state and switching to a proliferative noncontractile state. Since the expression levels of Gax and GATA-6 decrease rapidly on entry of VSMCs into the cell cycle, either or both may be responsible for maintaining VSMCs in their normal contractile and quiescent phenotype. Obviously, this is an important area of investigation, because modulating the activity of these proteins could lead to a better understanding of VSMC proliferation (and, by association, GMC proliferation) and provide better targets for drug therapy. This is clearly a point that Nagata et al1 and other investigators will want to explore. However, caution is needed before drawing too many conclusions from these studies, because both Gax and GATA-6 have similar effects on fibroblasts and VSMCs, suggesting that their effects are more global and less tissue-restricted than they may seem at first glance. Despite these uncertainties, Gax and GATA-6 presently seem to be the best candidates for tissue-specific transcription factors that may regulate VSMC proliferation, primarily because of their restricted expression patterns. In this regard, it will be interesting to determine whether Gax or GATA-6 controls cell proliferation in tissues other than VSMCs where they are expressed such as cardiac myocytes, which are terminally differentiated and, thus, unable to reenter the cell cycle.
From the background data discussed above, it can be postulated that
GATA-6 plays an important role in the regulation of VSMC proliferation.
In the present report by Nagata et al,1 the authors
have logically decided to examine whether GATA-6 also regulates cell
proliferation in GMCs. As was observed in VSMCs, GATA-6 expression was
detected in quiescent GMCs but decreased dramatically on serum
stimulation. In addition, forced expression of GATA-6 inhibited cell
proliferation in GMCs in a p21cip1-dependant
manner. What is unique about this study1 and earlier
work2 by Nagata and colleagues on VSMCs is that the
regulation of p21cip1 by GATA-6 is at the
posttranscriptional level. Nagata et al1 show that GATA-6,
by an uncharacterized mechanism, seems to stabilize the
p21cip1 protein. The stability of
p21cip1 protein levels was recently shown to be
regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.20 These
studies also showed that interactions with Cdks decrease
p21cip1 stability, whereas interaction with
proliferating cell nuclear antigen increases the stability of
p21cip1. Interestingly, the CCAAT/enhancer
binding protein
also binds to
p21cip1.21 This interaction results
in an inhibition of the ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis of
p21cip1. Thus, interactions with a variety of
nuclear proteins regulate p21cip1 protein
stability. Whether GATA-6 physically interacts with
p21cip1 and inhibits its ubiquitin-mediated
proteolysis is unknown but should be examined in future investigations.
Regardless of the mechanism, the ability of GATA-6 to stabilize
p21cip1 protein levels should be explored in
greater detail, since it may highlight a new role for GATA-6 outside of
its role in direct transcriptional regulation.
In addition to the stabilization of p21cip1, GATA-6 also inhibited the expression of cyclin A, but not cyclin D1 or E. This is an observation that was not reported by Nagata and colleagues in their previous work2 on VSMCs, and, as such, it is not known whether this result is unique to GMCs. However, because GATA-6 normally acts as a transcriptional activator, it will be of interest to determine the mechanism by which it represses cyclin A expression. In this regard, it is noteworthy that GATA factors interact with a family of transcriptional repressors called Friends of GATA (FOG).22 23 Future studies should determine whether the known FOG family members, FOG-1 and -2, are expressed in GMCs and whether they participate in the regulation of cyclin A.
In conclusion, the inhibition of cell proliferation in GMCs by overexpression of GATA-6 is a new chapter in an ever-growing volume on the diverse roles that GATA factors play during development. Although it appears from these studies that one of the major functions of GATA-6 in GMCs and VSMCs is regulating cell proliferation, the mechanism by which GATA-6 stabilizes the p21cip1 protein still needs to be determined. In addition, it will be of great interest to determine additional downstream transcriptional targets of GATA-6 in GMCs (and VSMCs), since this may provide additional clues as to how GATA-6 may negatively regulate cell proliferation. However, investigators should keep in mind that much of the data discussed above are derived from in vitro studies and, therefore, will need to be confirmed by additional investigations in vivo. In the end, tissue restricted knockouts in mice will need to be generated and analyzed to fully determine the role that GATA-6 plays during the growth and development of GMCs and VSMCs.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Perlman H, Suzuki E, Simonson M, Smith RC, Walsh K.
GATA-6 induces p21(Cip1) expression and G1 cell cycle arrest.
J Biol Chem. 1998;273:1371313718.
3.
Ko LJ, Engel JD. DNA-binding specificities of the GATA
transcription factor family. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:40114022.
4.
Merika M, Orkin SH. DNA-binding specificity of GATA
family transcription factors. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:39994010.
5. Simon MC. Gotta have GATA. Nat Genet. 1995;11:911.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Takahashi S, Komeno T, Suwabe N, Yoh K, Nakajima O,
Nishimura S, Kuroha T, Nagasawa T, Yamamoto M. Role of GATA-1 in
proliferation and differentiation of definitive erythroid and
megakaryocytic cells in vivo. Blood. 1998;92:434442.
7.
Tsai FY, Orkin SH. Transcription factor GATA-2 is
required for proliferation/survival of early hematopoietic cells and
mast cell formation, but not for erythroid and myeloid terminal
differentiation. Blood. 1997;89:36363643.
8. Morrisey EE, Ip HS, Lu MM, Parmacek MS. GATA-6: a zinc finger transcription factor that is expressed in multiple cell lineages derived from lateral mesoderm. Dev Biol. 1996;177:309322.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Kuo CT, Morrisey EE, Anandappa R, Sigrist K, Lu MM,
Parmacek MS, Soudais C, Leiden JM. GATA4 transcription factor is
required for ventral morphogenesis and heart tube formation.
Genes Dev. 1997;11:10481060.
10.
Molkentin JD, Lin Q, Duncan SA, Olson EN. Requirement
of the transcription factor GATA4 for heart tube formation and ventral
morphogenesis. Genes Dev. 1997;11:10611072.
11.
Morrisey EE, Tang Z, Sigrist K, Lu MM, Jiang F, Ip HS,
Parmacek MS. GATA6 regulates HNF4 and is required for differentiation
of visceral endoderm in the mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 1998;12:35793590.
12. Sukhatme VP, Kartha S, Toback FG, Taub R, Hoover RG, Tsai-Morris CH. A novel early growth response gene rapidly induced by fibroblast, epithelial cell and lymphocyte mitogens. Oncogene Res. 1987;1:343355.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Hofer G, Grimmer C, Sukhatme VP, Sterzel RB, Rupprecht
HD. Transcription factor Egr-1 regulates glomerular
mesangial cell proliferation. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:2830628310.
14. Rupprecht HD, Akagi Y, Keil A, Hofer G. Nitric oxide inhibits growth of glomerular mesangial cells: role of the transcription factor EGR-1. Kidney Int. 2000;57:7082.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Lavia P, Jansen-Durr P. E2F target genes and cell-cycle checkpoint control. Bioessays. 1999;21:221230.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Inoshita S, Terada Y, Nakashima O, Kuwahara M, Sasaki S, Marumo F. Roles of E2F1 in mesangial cell proliferation in vitro. Kidney Int. 1999;56:20852095.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Inoshita S, Terada Y, Nakashima O, Kuwahara M, Sasaki S, Marumo F. Regulation of the G1/S transition phase in mesangial cells by E2F1. Kidney Int. 1999;56:12381241.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Gorski DH, LePage DF, Patel CV, Copeland NG, Jenkins
NA, Walsh K. Molecular cloning of a diverged homeobox gene that is
rapidly down-regulated during the G0/G1 transition in vascular smooth
muscle cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:37223733.
19.
Smith RC, Branellec D, Gorski DH, Guo K, Perlman H,
Dedieu JF, Pastore C, Mahfoudi A, Denefle P, Isner JM, Walsh K.
p21CIP1-mediated inhibition of cell proliferation by overexpression of
the gax homeodomain gene. Genes Dev. 1997;11:16741689.
20. Cayrol C, Ducommun B. Interaction with cyclin-dependent kinases and PCNA modulates proteasome-dependent degradation of p21. Oncogene. 1998;17:24372444.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Timchenko NA, Harris TE, Wilde M, Bilyeu TA,
Burgess-Beusse BL, Finegold MJ, Darlington GJ. CCAAT/enhancer binding
protein
regulates p21 protein and hepatocyte
proliferation in newborn mice. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17:73537361.[Abstract]
22. Deconinck AE, Mead PE, Tevosian SG, Crispino JD, Katz SG, Zon LI, Orkin SH. FOG acts as a repressor of red blood cell development in Xenopus. Development. 2000;127:20312040.[Abstract]
23.
Svensson EC, Tufts RL, Polk CE, Leiden JM. Molecular
cloning of FOG-2: a modulator of transcription factor GATA-4 in
cardiomyocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:956861.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Bielinska, S. Kiiveri, H. Parviainen, S. Mannisto, M. Heikinheimo, and D. B. Wilson Gonadectomy-induced Adrenocortical Neoplasia in the Domestic Ferret (Mustela putorius furo) and Laboratory Mouse. Vet. Pathol., February 1, 2006; 43(2): 97 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Guo, Y. Akiyama, M. G. House, C. M. Hooker, E. Heath, E. Gabrielson, S. C. Yang, Y. Han, S. B. Baylin, J. G. Herman, et al. Hypermethylation of the GATA Genes in Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2004; 10(23): 7917 - 7924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Divine, L. J. Staloch, H. Haveri, C. M. Jacobsen, D. B. Wilson, M. Heikinheimo, and T. C. Simon GATA-4, GATA-5, and GATA-6 activate the rat liver fatty acid binding protein gene in concert with HNF-1{alpha} Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): G1086 - G1099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. LaVoie The Role of GATA in Mammalian Reproduction Experimental Biology and Medicine, December 1, 2003; 228(11): 1282 - 1290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Liu, M. Ikegami, M. T. Stahlman, C. R. Dey, and J. A. Whitsett Inhibition of alveolarization and altered pulmonary mechanics in mice expressing GATA-6 Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): L1246 - L1254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bielinska, H. Parviainen, S. B. Porter-Tinge, S. Kiiveri, E. Genova, N. Rahman, I. T. Huhtaniemi, L. J. Muglia, M. Heikinheimo, and D. B. Wilson Mouse Strain Susceptibility to Gonadectomy-Induced Adrenocortical Tumor Formation Correlates with the Expression of GATA-4 and Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Endocrinology, September 1, 2003; 144(9): 4123 - 4133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |