This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Emerson, G. G. Articles by Segal, S. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Emerson, G. G. Articles by Segal, S. S. Related Collections Electrophysiology Cell signalling/signal transduction Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide Other Vascular biology

(Circulation Research. 2000;87:474.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.

Integrative Physiology

Electrical Coupling Between Endothelial Cells and Smooth Muscle Cells in Hamster Feed Arteries

Role in Vasomotor Control

Geoffrey G. Emerson, Steven S. Segal

From The John B. Pierce Laboratory and Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.

Correspondence to Steven S. Segal, PhD, The John B. Pierce Laboratory, Yale University School of Medicine, 290 Congress Ave, New Haven, CT 06519. E-mail sssegal{at}jbpierce.org

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Abstract—Endothelial cells (ECs) govern smooth muscle cell (SMC) tone via the release of paracrine factors (eg, NO and metabolites of arachidonic acid). We tested the hypothesis that ECs can promote SMC relaxation or contraction via direct electrical coupling. Vessels (resting diameter, 57±3 µm; length, 4 mm) were isolated, cannulated, and pressurized (75 mm Hg; 37°C). Two microelectrodes were used to simultaneously impale 2 cells (ECs or SMCs) in the vessel wall separated by 500 µm. Impalements of one EC and one SMC (n=26) displayed equivalent membrane potentials at rest, during spontaneous oscillations, and during hyperpolarization and vasodilation to acetylcholine. Injection of -0.8 nA into an EC caused hyperpolarization (5 mV) and relaxation of SMCs (dilation, 5 µm) along the vessel segment. In a reciprocal manner, +0.8 nA caused depolarization (2 mV) of SMCs with constriction (2 µm). Current injection into SMCs while recording from ECs produced similar results. We conclude that ECs and SMCs are electrically coupled to each other in these vessels, such that electrical signals conducted along the endothelium can be directly transmitted to the surrounding smooth muscle to evoke vasomotor responses.

Key Words: endothelium • smooth muscle • electrical coupling • resistance artery • conduction

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Endothelial cells (ECs) promote smooth muscle relaxation through the release of NO,¹ prostaglandins,² and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factors (EDHFs).^{3 4} These paracrine factors promote K⁺ efflux from smooth muscle cells (SMCs), with ensuing relaxation.^{4 5} Recent evidence suggests that ECs may also effect SMC relaxation via direct myoendothelial coupling.

Electron microscopic studies demonstrate regions of close apposition between endothelium and smooth muscle.^{6 7 8 9 10 11} These regions are believed to contain myoendothelial gap junctions^{7 8 11 12} that promote the direct transfer of electrical and chemical signals between ECs and SMCs.^{13 14 15 16 17 18 19} In previous studies, membrane potential has typically been measured in a single cell, with electrical coupling inferred between respective cell types. A definitive measure of electrical coupling entails simultaneous recording²⁰ from endothelium and smooth muscle, once demonstrated in strips of coronary artery, albeit in the absence of vasomotor responses.²¹ Dual simultaneous recordings have not been obtained from intact vessels that control oxygen delivery to target tissues. Therefore, it is not known whether electrical coupling between ECs and SMCs is of functional significance with respect to blood flow control.

In this study, we tested the hypothesis that ECs and SMCs are electrically coupled in resistance microvessels. Experiments were performed using feed arteries from the hamster retractor muscle, because these vessels are known to control blood flow to downstream tissue^{22 23} and have wall morphology (a single layer of ECs surrounded by a single layer of SMCs) that is conducive to intracellular recording.²⁴ Electrophysiological responses were induced and recorded simultaneously from defined ECs and SMCs during vasodilation and vasoconstriction. Our data demonstrate that endothelium and smooth muscle are electrically coupled to each other and that such myoendothelial coupling plays a key role in coordinating vasomotor activity.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
General
Procedures were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of The John B. Pierce Laboratory. Male Golden hamsters (n=28; 80 to 90 g) were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (65 mg/kg IP), and feed arteries supplying the retractor muscle were isolated.²⁴ In a chamber (1 mL) containing physiological saline, the vessel was cannulated and in vivo pressure (75 mm Hg) was restored. Spontaneous tone developed during equilibration for 30 minutes at 37°C. EC and SMC viability was tested with microiontophoresis of acetylcholine (ACh) and phenylephrine, respectively.^{24 25}

Electrophysiology
For mechanical stability, the vessel was positioned on a Sylgard block submerged at the bottom of the vessel chamber. Two glass microelectrodes containing 1% propidium iodide in 2 mol/L KCl (resistance, 100 to 150 M), each connected to an intracellular electrometer, were aligned with the vessel axis at a penetration angle of 60°. In 5 recordings, one microelectrode contained 4% Lucifer yellow in 135 mmol/L LiCl₂ (resistance, 400 to 600 M) to determine whether recordings were affected by the type of intracellular dye used. Both dyes are membrane-impermeant; however, dye can diffuse from an EC to its neighbors through gap junctions.^{14 24 25 26} To impale a cell, each microelectrode was advanced slowly into the vessel wall, and the base of the micromanipulator was gently tapped.²⁴ When tip potential rapidly dropped to -30 mV^{24 25} and remained stable for >1 minute, the other microelectrode was advanced similarly into another cell at a separation distance of 500 µm. When both microelectrodes were lodged in cells simultaneously, the vessel was stimulated (see below). At the end of each recording, it was confirmed that tip potential returned rapidly to 0±2 mV on withdrawal from the cell. Vessels were then viewed using fluorescence microscopy to identify the cell type recorded from on the basis of the pattern of dye staining.²⁴

Vessel Stimulation
During dual-cell impalements, current (±1.6 nA; 1.5 seconds) was injected into one electrode, or ACh was microiontophoresed onto the distal end of the vessel. The vasomotor response was measured using video calipers positioned at the recording electrode farthest from the stimulus. Electrical and vasomotor responses (resolutions, 1 mV and 1 µm, respectively) were acquired at 400 Hz.

Pharmacology
To inhibit the effects of NO, cytochrome P-450 metabolites, or metabolites of arachidonic acid, vessels were incubated with N-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA; 100 µmol/L, 30 minutes), 17-octadecynoic acid (ODYA; 10 µmol/L, 30 minutes), or indomethacin (10 µmol/L, 15 minutes).²⁷

Electron Microscopy
Feed arteries were fixed in situ with Karnovsky’s fixative for 10 minutes. The tissue was excised, postfixed for 20 minutes, and stored in 0.1 mol/L sodium cacodylate buffer with 7% sucrose for 4 days. Vessels were osmicated, stained en bloc with 3% uranyl acetate, and embedded in epoxy resin. Tissue was sectioned at 50 nm thickness, stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and examined on a Zeiss 109T transmission electron microscope.

Data Analysis
Representative tracings were selected to illustrate typical responses. Summary data are presented as mean±SEM. Statistical analyses are given in context.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
On pressurization, feed arteries (n=28) initially dilated to their maximal diameter (82±3 µm). Spontaneous tone developed during equilibration (resting diameter, 57±3 µm) and persisted throughout the experiment (3 to 5 hours). All vessels dilated to ACh and constricted to phenylephrine.

Recorded cells were identified by dye (propidium iodide or Lucifer yellow) that diffused from the microelectrode during intracellular recording.²⁴ Because there is typically one SMC layer in these vessels, intracellular microelectrodes readily penetrated to ECs (50% of impalements) with no apparent damage to (or labeling of) surrounding SMCs. During EC impalement, multiple ECs (oriented parallel to vessel axis, Figure 1A) were labeled, regardless of the dye used. In contrast, smooth muscle labeling was confined to the impaled cell (oriented perpendicular to the vessel axis, Figure 1B). Moreover, dye did not spread from ECs to SMCs or vice versa. Propidium iodide labeled cell nuclei, whereas Lucifer yellow labeled the entire cell (Figure 1C). Electrophysiological responses were similar whether electrodes contained propidium iodide or Lucifer yellow. Resting membrane potential and electrophysiological responses were unchanged throughout a given impalement (up to 1.5 hours); vasomotor responses were unchanged in the impaled region throughout the experiment (up to 5 hours).

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Intracellular labeling of ECs and SMCs. During intracellular recording, propidium iodide or Lucifer yellow dye diffused from the microelectrode into the impaled cell. After each recording, impaled sites were identified with fluorescence microscopy. A, EC nuclei stained with propidium iodide. Nuclei are oriented parallel to the vessel axis (white lines depict vessel boundaries), with multiple cells stained after impalement of a single EC. B, SMC nucleus stained with propidium iodide. A single SMC nucleus, oriented perpendicular to the vessel axis, is stained. A and B, Cells that correspond to recordings in Figure 2. C, EC nuclei stained with propidium iodide (red) with nearby SMC stained with Lucifer yellow (green). Note lack of dye transfer between ECs and SMCs. Scale bars=15 µm (A), 15 µm (B), and 10 µm (C).

Two to five simultaneous dual-cell recordings were obtained from each vessel. During recordings from one EC and one SMC (n=26), membrane potential in both cells was identical (–28±1 mV), and oscillations in membrane potential were simultaneous and equivalent (Figure 2). Injection of negative (hyperpolarizing) current into the EC resulted in simultaneous hyperpolarization of the SMC, with ensuing vasodilation (lag time between onset of hyperpolarization and onset of vasodilation, 1.7±0.1 seconds). Conversely, injection of negative current into the SMC caused simultaneous hyperpolarization of the EC, with ensuing vasodilation (lag time, 1.6±0.1 seconds). When ACh was microiontophoresed onto the downstream end of the vessel, simultaneous hyperpolarization of both cell types ensued (Figure 2B), and vasodilation conducted along the entire vessel (n=8). Addition of L-NNA decreased resting diameter (n=7; 75±4 versus 67±3 µm; P<0.05, paired t test; reversed with 1 mmol/L L-arginine) but did not alter the vasodilatory response to ACh. Further, indomethacin (n=4), 17-ODYA (n=3), or L-NNA and 17-ODYA in combination (n=3) had no effect on the vasodilatory response to ACh. These findings argue against a role for NO or metabolites of arachidonic acid in mediating responses to ACh. Electron microscopy revealed regions of electron-dense apposition between ECs and SMCs (Figure 2C), indicating the presence of myoendothelial gap junctions.¹¹

View larger version (44K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Simultaneous recording of membrane potential (Em) from an EC and an SMC. A, Illustration of an isolated vessel with microelectrodes impaled in an EC and an SMC. A micropipette filled with ACh is positioned at the downstream end of the vessel (with respect to superfusion of physiological saline; Flow) to trigger hyperpolarization and vasodilation, which conduct along the entire vessel. Scale bar=250 µm. B, Simultaneous recording of diameter, membrane potential of EC, and membrane potential of SMC. During the recording, 3 stimuli were applied, as follows: -0.8 nA was injected into EC (solid bar), -0.8 nA was injected into SMC (open bar), and ACh was delivered by microiontophoresis (; 500 nA, 500 ms). Each stimulus evoked dilation along the entire vessel; diameter was recorded at site of SMC impalement. Note simultaneous oscillations in membrane potential (magnified inset). This record is representative of n=26 dual-cell recordings from ECs and SMCs. Scale bar=5 seconds. C, Electron micrograph of feed artery wall in cross section. EC (with prominent nucleus, adjacent to the vessel lumen, L) and SMC (underlying the adventitia, A) are separated by internal elastic lamina except in the region of EC:SMC contact, where electron-dense regions characteristic of myoendothelial gap junctions11 are present (arrowhead). Scale bar=0.2 µm.

To test whether electrical coupling within the endothelium is greater than electrical coupling between ECs and SMCs, current was injected into one cell while the electrical response in the other cell was recorded.²⁰ Each combination of cell-cell coupling was evaluated, as follows: (1) endothelial-endothelial, (2) endothelial-smooth muscle, (3) smooth muscle-endothelial, and (4) smooth muscle-smooth muscle (Figures 3 and 4). For all combinations, injection of -0.8 nA evoked simultaneous hyperpolarization of the second cell and vasodilation that conducted along the entire feed artery. In a complementary manner, injection of +0.8 nA evoked depolarization and constriction that conducted along the vessel. In each case, the electrical response of the noninjected cell was instantaneous in onset and offset for both hyperpolarization and depolarization. The magnitudes of electrical and vasomotor responses were similar for all cell-cell combinations (Figures 3 and 4), as were the delays between the onset of hyperpolarization and the onset of vasodilation (1.7±0.1 seconds) and between depolarization and vasoconstriction (1.3±0.1 seconds).

View larger version (26K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Diameter and electrophysiological responses to current injection. Two cells in the vessel wall were impaled simultaneously (microelectrode separation, 500 µm). -0.8 nA (solid bar) and +0.8 nA (open bar) were injected for 1.5 seconds into an EC (A and B) or an SMC (C and D) while recording from an EC (A and C) or an SMC (B and D). For all combinations, negative current evoked hyperpolarization and vasodilation at the recording site, whereas positive current evoked depolarization (or changed the electrical baseline) and vasoconstriction. A through D, Bottom tracing indicates membrane potential of the injected cell; middle tracing, membrane potential of the recorded cell; and top tracing, diameter at the recorded cell. Cell type identified as in Figure 1. Note simultaneous oscillations of membrane potential in panel D. These 1-Hz oscillations are more rapid than vasomotor responses, which are typically delayed (2 seconds) and prolonged (5 to 10 seconds) with respect to electrical events.

View larger version (28K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Summary data (n=6 to 13) of electrophysiological (A) and diameter (B) responses to negative (hatched columns) and positive (open columns) current injection. Response magnitudes were calculated as peak minus resting value (error bars indicate SEM) and were not different between conditions (ANOVA). Cell type was identified as in Figure 1. The transfer resistance (defined as the change in voltage at the recording electrode divided by the current injected) was not different (ANOVA) between EC-EC (6.5±0.5 M), EC-SMC (6.7±0.6 M), SMC-EC (6.8±0.8 M), and SMC-SMC (5.6±0.6 M), indicating that electrical coupling between the 2 cells was similar in all combinations.

In all cell-cell combinations, responses to -0.8 nA were consistently greater than responses to +0.8 nA (Figures 3 and 4). To further explore this relationship, the current intensity was varied between –1.6 and +1.6 nA (Figure 5). Throughout this range, pooled for all cells that compose the conduction pathway, the "transfer resistance" (Figure 4, legend) for positive current was 25% of that for negative current (1.3±0.5 versus 6.0±0.5 M, respectively; P<0.01, paired t test). Nevertheless, for ECs as well as SMCs, the relationship between electrophysiological and vasomotor responses was approximately linear (1 µm/mV; Figure 5C). This proportionality between electrical and mechanical responses to current injection is consistent with electromechanical coupling.^{25 28} For rapid (1-Hz) oscillations in membrane potential (eg, Figures 2B and 3D), electrical events were presumably too brief to be accompanied by corresponding mechanical events.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. Current, voltage, and diameter relationships during current injection. During dual-cell impalements (n=35), current pulses (±0.4 to 1.6 nA, 1.5 seconds) were injected into one cell and recorded in the other cell. A, Current-voltage relationship demonstrating that electrical response to current injection is intensity-dependent. Note that responses to positive current were significantly smaller than responses to equal negative current. B, Current-diameter relationship demonstrating that the mechanical response ( Diameter) to the injection of current (nA) is intensity-dependent. C, Voltage-diameter relationship demonstrating linearity between change in membrane potential ( Em) and change in diameter. This relationship was similar whether recording from ECs () or SMCs (•).

Controls were performed for current injection as follows. (1) Throughout experiments, stimuli were delivered with microelectrodes positioned in the bath to confirm that the bridge of the electrometer was balanced similarly for positive and negative current injections. (2) Current injection into the bath adjacent to the vessel failed to evoke vasomotor or electrophysiological responses (n=6). (3) Injection of current into a cell failed to evoke a response from a recording electrode positioned in the bath adjacent to the vessel (n=7). (4) During simultaneous impalements, increasing stimulus duration (eg, to 15 seconds) correspondingly prolonged electrical responses and enhanced changes in vessel diameter (n=5; data not shown).

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
We present the first dual simultaneous electrophysiological recordings obtained concomitant with vasomotor responses. Our findings demonstrate that ECs and SMCs are electrically coupled to each other in resistance microvessels that control blood flow to the hamster retractor muscle. Instantaneous, bidirectional transmission of electrical signals between endothelium and smooth muscle ensures that both cell types consistently display equivalent membrane potential. Thus, myoendothelial coupling enables electrical responses originating in either the endothelium or the smooth muscle to evoke robust vasomotor responses along the entire vessel segment.

Endothelium-dependent agonists (eg, ACh) can hyperpolarize and relax SMCs by a mechanism independent of NO, EDHFs, and prostaglandins.^{15 16 29} Conversely, SMC-specific agonists (eg, phenylephrine) can alter EC calcium¹³ and membrane potential.^{17 18 28 30} Electron microscopy has revealed electron-dense regions of membrane apposition between SMCs and ECs in conduit vessels,^{8 9} resistance arteries,¹¹ and arterioles.^{6 7} Such regions of membranous contact (eg, Figure 2C) are believed to contain gap junctions. Whereas putative gap junction antagonists can inhibit responses that depend on cell coupling,^{15 16 17 18 19} there is a paucity of direct evidence²¹ that electrical signals spread freely between ECs and SMCs. Moreover, the role of myoendothelial electrical coupling in governing vascular resistance has not been defined.

Hyperpolarization and depolarization evoke vasodilation and vasoconstriction, respectively, through electromechanical coupling (Figure 5C). This behavior is consistent with voltage-operated calcium channels in SMCs.³¹ However, the present findings demonstrate that injection of current into an EC evokes vasodilation or vasoconstriction (according to polarity) and that EC membrane potential itself is a powerful determinant of electromechanical coupling within the smooth muscle layer (Figure 5C). Both electrical and mechanical responses to negative current were consistently larger than those to equivalent positive current (Figures 3 and 4), and depolarizations were frequently followed by a slight, transient hyperpolarization (eg, Figure 3). These features of the response to positive current are consistent with the presence of voltage-activated potassium channels.³²

Myoendothelial coupling promotes synchronization of cells in the vessel wall.³³ In arterioles and feed arteries, cells are organized such that each EC spans 20 SMCs and each SMC spans 20 ECs.^{24 25 34} This wall morphology promotes heterologous cell-to-cell contact. Further, homologous coupling within the endothelium^{14 25 26 35 36} promotes electrical conduction along the vessel axis.^{24 34} The integrity of the EC layer is required for conducting hyperpolarization and vasodilation along hamster feed arteries, indicating relatively poor coupling between SMCs.²⁴ Here we demonstrate in the same vessels that myoendothelial coupling is of similar electrical resistance to that within the endothelium (Figure 4). In turn, myoendothelial coupling ensures that SMCs are electrically coupled to each other (albeit indirectly) via the endothelium (Figures 3 and 4).

The importance of NO,^{1 37} EDHFs,^{3 4 27} and prostaglandins² during endothelium-dependent vasodilation is well demonstrated. Although we cannot rule out a contribution of these paracrine agents to current-induced vasodilation, their involvement is unlikely given the instantaneous and bidirectional nature of electrical transmission and the failure of established pharmacological interventions to block responses to ACh.

The present study was performed in vitro rather than in vivo because dual-cell intracellular recording requires absolute mechanical stability; this condition cannot be achieved when feed arteries pulse with arterial pressure. However, the electrical behavior of vessels studied in vitro may differ from that in vivo.^{25 28} Further, the rapid (<2-hour) turnover of connexin molecules³⁸ implies that the properties of cell-to-cell coupling within a vessel may change over time. To minimize the potential for such effects, we restored isolated vessels to in vivo length and transmural pressure. The resting diameter and vasomotor responses of feed arteries in vitro²⁴ are similar to those in vivo,³⁹ indicating that functional integrity is preserved throughout our experimental procedures. Whereas the resting membrane potential (–30 mV) of cells in our preparation is depolarized relative to unpressurized arterioles in vitro,^{28 40} it is similar to that reported for arterioles in vivo.^{25 27} We attribute this difference in membrane potential to the restoration of physiological transmural pressure and the depolarizing effect of the myogenic response.⁴¹

In summary, we present the first simultaneous measurements of EC membrane potential, SMC membrane potential, and diameter responses. Our data establish that electrical signals travel freely and bidirectionally between ECs and SMCs to evoke robust vasomotor responses. We conclude that myoendothelial coupling can serve as a rapid, integral component of blood flow control.

	Acknowledgments

 
This study was supported by NIH Grants RO1-HL41026 and RO1-HL56786, Yale Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center grant P30-DK45735, and Medical Scientist Training Program Fellowship GM07205 (to G.G.E.). Beth Doran provided expert technical assistance in preparing electron micrographs.

Received June 7, 2000; revision received July 13, 2000; accepted July 17, 2000.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Palmer RMJ, Ferrige AG, Moncada S. Nitric oxide release accounts for the biological activity of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Nature. 1987;327:524–526.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Messina EJ, Sun D, Koller A, Wolin MS, Kaley G. Role of endothelium-derived prostaglandins in hypoxia-elicited arteriolar dilation in rat skeletal muscle. Circ Res. 1992;71:790–796.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Campbell WB, Harder DR. Endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factors and vascular cytochrome P-450 metabolites of arachidonic acid in the regulation of tone. Circ Res. 1999;84:484–488.[Free Full Text]
4. Fisslthaler B, Popp R, Kiss L, Potente M, Harder DR, Fleming I, Busse R. Cytochrome P450 2C is an EDHF synthase in coronary arteries. Nature. 1999;401:493–497.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Bolotina VM, Najibi S, Palacino JJ, Pagano PJ, Cohen RA. Nitric oxide directly activates calcium-dependent potassium channels in vascular smooth muscle. Nature. 1994;368:850–853.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Moore DH, Ruska H. The fine structure of capillaries and small arteries. J Biophys Biochem Cytol. 1956;3:457–461.
7. Rhodin JAG. The ultrastructure of mammalian arterioles and precapillary sphincters. J Ultrastruct Res. 1967;18:181–223.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Spagnoli LG, Villaschi S, Neri L, Palmieri G. Gap junctions in myo-endothelial bridges of rabbit carotid arteries. Experientia. 1982;38:124–125.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Sosa-Melgarejo JA, Berry CL. Myoendothelial contacts in the thoracic aorta of rat fetuses. J Pathol. 1992;166:311–316.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Simionescu M, Simionescu N, Palade GE. Segmental differentiations of cell junctions in the vascular endothelium. J Cell Biol. 1975;67:863–885.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Sandow SL, Hill CE. Incidence of myoendothelial gap junctions in the proximal and distal mesenteric arteries of the rat is suggestive of a role in endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated responses. Circ Res. 2000;86:341–346.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Little TL, Beyer EC, Duling BR. Connexin 43 and connexin 40 gap junctional proteins are present in arteriolar smooth muscle and endothelium in vivo. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:H729–H739.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Dora KA, Doyle MP, Duling BR. Elevation of intracellular calcium in smooth muscle causes endothelial cell generation of NO in arterioles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:6529–6534.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Little TL, Xia J, Duling BR. Dye tracers define differential endothelial and smooth muscle coupling patterns within the arteriolar wall. Circ Res. 1995;76:498–504.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Hutcheson IR, Chaytor AT, Evans WH, Griffith TM. Nitric oxide-independent relaxations to acetylcholine and A23187 involve different routes of heterocellular communication: role of gap junctions and phospholipase A₂. Circ Res. 1999;84:53–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Griffith TM, Taylor HJ. Cyclic AMP mediates EDHF-type relaxations of rabbit jugular vein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;263:52–57.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Marchenko SM, Sage SO. Smooth muscle cells affect endothelial membrane potential in rat aorta. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:H804–H811.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Murai T, Muraki K, Imaizumi Y, Watanabe M. Levcromakalim causes indirect endothelial hyperpolarization via a myo-endothelial pathway. Br J Pharmacol. 1999;128:1491–1496.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Yamamoto Y, Fukuta H, Nakahira Y, Suzuki H. Blockade by 18ß-glycyrrhetinic acid of intercellular electrical coupling in guinea-pig arterioles. J Physiol (Lond). 1998;511:501–508.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Hirst GD, Neild TO. An analysis of excitatory junctional potentials recorded from arterioles. J Physiol (Lond). 1978;80:87–104.
21. von der Weid P-Y, Bény J-L. Simultaneous oscillations in the membrane potential of pig coronary artery endothelial and smooth muscle cells. J Physiol (Lond). 1993;471:13–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Welsh DG, Segal SS. Muscle length directs sympathetic nerve activity and vasomotor tone in resistance vessels of hamster retractor. Circ Res. 1996;79:551–559.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. VanTeeffelen JWGE, Segal SS. Effect of motor unit recruitment on functional vasodilatation in hamster retractor muscle. J Physiol (Lond). 2000;524:267–278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Emerson GG, Segal SS. Endothelial cell pathway for conduction of hyperpolarization and vasodilation along hamster feed artery. Circ Res. 2000;86:94–100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Welsh DG, Segal SS. Endothelial and smooth muscle cell conduction in arterioles controlling blood flow. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:H178–H186.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Segal SS, Bény J-L. Intracellular recording and dye transfer in arterioles during blood flow control. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:H1–H7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Welsh DG, Segal SS. Role of EDHF in conduction of vasodilation along hamster cheek pouch arterioles in vivo. Am J Physiol. 2000;278:H1832–H1839.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Xia J, Duling BR. Electromechanical coupling and the conducted vasomotor response. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:H2022–H2030.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Yamamoto Y, Imaeda K, Suzuki H. Endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization and intercellular electrical coupling in guinea-pig mesenteric arterioles. J Physiol (Lond). 1999;514:505–513.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Bény J-L, Pacicca C. Bidirectional electrical communication between smooth muscle and endothelial cells in the pig coronary artery. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:H1465–H1472.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Nelson MT, Patlak JB, Worley JF, Standen NB. Calcium channels, potassium channels, and voltage dependence of arterial smooth muscle tone. Am J Physiol. 1990;259:C3–C18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Nelson MT, Quayle JM. Physiological roles and properties of potassium channels in arterial smooth muscle. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:C799–C822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Bény J-L. Information networks in the arterial wall. News Physiol Sci. 1999;14:68–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Haas TL, Duling BR. Morphology favors an endothelial cell pathway for longitudinal conduction within arterioles. Microvasc Res. 1997;53:113–120.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Larson DM, Sheridan JD. Junctional transfer in cultured vascular endothelium, II: dye and nucleotide transfer. J Membr Biol. 1985;83:157–167.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Larson DM, Kam EY, Sheridan JD. Junctional transfer in cultured vascular endothelium, I: electrical coupling. J Membr Biol. 1983;74:103–113.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Doyle MP, Duling BR. Acetylcholine induces conducted vasodilation by nitric oxide-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:H1364–H1371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Spray DC. Gap junction proteins: where they live and how they die. Circ Res. 1998;83:679–681.[Free Full Text]
39. Segal SS, Welsh DG, Kurjiaka DT. Spread of vasodilatation and vasoconstriction along feed arteries and arterioles of hamster skeletal muscle. J Physiol (Lond). 1999;516:283–291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Hirst GDS, Edwards FR, Gould DJ, Sandow SL, Hill CE. Electrical properties of iridial arterioles of the rat. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:H2465–H2472.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Harder DR. Pressure-dependent membrane depolarization in cat middle cerebral artery. Circ Res. 1984;55:197–202.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. E. Hill Inward rectification and vascular function: As it was in the beginning J. Physiol., March 15, 2008; 586(6): 1465 - 1467. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D. Smith, S. E. Brett, K. D. Luykenaar, S. L. Sandow, S. P. Marrelli, E. J. Vigmond, and D. G. Welsh KIR channels function as electrical amplifiers in rat vascular smooth muscle J. Physiol., February 15, 2008; 586(4): 1147 - 1160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. N. Tallini, J. F. Brekke, B. Shui, R. Doran, S.-m. Hwang, J. Nakai, G. Salama, S. S. Segal, and M. I. Kotlikoff Propagated Endothelial Ca2+ Waves and Arteriolar Dilation In Vivo: Measurements in Cx40BAC GCaMP2 Transgenic Mice Circ. Res., December 7, 2007; 101(12): 1300 - 1309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Paffett, J. S. Naik, T. C. Resta, and B. R. Walker Reduced store-operated Ca2+ entry in pulmonary endothelial cells from chronically hypoxic rats Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): L1135 - L1142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Armstrong, A. K. Dua, and C. L. Murrant Potassium initiates vasodilatation induced by a single skeletal muscle contraction in hamster cremaster muscle J. Physiol., June 1, 2007; 581(2): 841 - 852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Rodenwaldt, U. Pohl, and C. de Wit Endogenous and exogenous NO attenuates conduction of vasoconstrictions along arterioles in the microcirculation Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2341 - H2348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Uhrenholt, T. L. Domeier, and S. S. Segal Propagation of calcium waves along endothelium of hamster feed arteries Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): H1634 - H1640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L. Domeier and S. S. Segal Electromechanical and pharmacomechanical signalling pathways for conducted vasodilatation along endothelium of hamster feed arteries J. Physiol., February 15, 2007; 579(1): 175 - 186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Q. Zhang, C. Cao, M. Mangano, Z. Zhang, E. P. Silldorff, W. Lee-Kwon, K. Payne, and T. L. Pallone Descending vasa recta endothelium is an electrical syncytium Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): R1688 - R1699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. F. Figueroa, B. E. Isakson, and B. R. Duling Vascular Gap Junctions in Hypertension Hypertension, November 1, 2006; 48(5): 804 - 811. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. C. Jantzi, S. E. Brett, W. F. Jackson, R. Corteling, E. J. Vigmond, and D. G. Welsh Inward rectifying potassium channels facilitate cell-to-cell communication in hamster retractor muscle feed arteries Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): H1319 - H1328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Earley and M. T. Nelson Central role of Ca2+-dependent regulation of vascular tone in vivo J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2006; 101(1): 10 - 11. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Brekke, W. F. Jackson, and S. S. Segal Arteriolar smooth muscle Ca2+ dynamics during blood flow control in hamster cheek pouch J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2006; 101(1): 307 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. V. Matchkov, A. Rahman, L. M. Bakker, T. M. Griffith, H. Nilsson, and C. Aalkjaer Analysis of effects of connexin-mimetic peptides in rat mesenteric small arteries Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): H357 - H367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. M. Sokoya, A. R. Burns, C. T. Setiawan, H. A. Coleman, H. C. Parkington, and M. Tare Evidence for the involvement of myoendothelial gap junctions in EDHF-mediated relaxation in the rat middle cerebral artery Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2006; 291(1): H385 - H393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Feletou and P. M. Vanhoutte Endothelium-Derived Hyperpolarizing Factor: Where Are We Now? Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2006; 26(6): 1215 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. I. Gokina and T. Goecks Upregulation of endothelial cell Ca2+ signaling contributes to pregnancy-enhanced vasodilation of rat uteroplacental arteries Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2006; 290(5): H2124 - H2135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. F. Jackson Silent Inward Rectifier K+ Channels in Hypercholesterolemia Circ. Res., April 28, 2006; 98(8): 982 - 984. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Radaelli, P. Castiglioni, M. Centola, F. Cesana, G. Balestri, A. U. Ferrari, and M. Di Rienzo Adrenergic origin of very low-frequency blood pressure oscillations in the unanesthetized rat Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): H357 - H364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Siegl, M. Koeppen, S. E. Wolfle, U. Pohl, and C. de Wit Myoendothelial Coupling Is Not Prominent in Arterioles Within the Mouse Cremaster Microcirculation In Vivo Circ. Res., October 14, 2005; 97(8): 781 - 788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. K Diep, E. J Vigmond, S. S Segal, and D. G Welsh Defining electrical communication in skeletal muscle resistance arteries: a computational approach J. Physiol., October 1, 2005; 568(1): 267 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mather, K. A. Dora, S. L. Sandow, P. Winter, and C. J. Garland Rapid Endothelial Cell-Selective Loading of Connexin 40 Antibody Blocks Endothelium-Derived Hyperpolarizing Factor Dilation in Rat Small Mesenteric Arteries Circ. Res., August 19, 2005; 97(4): 399 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Koenigsberger, R. Sauser, J.-L. Beny, and J.-J. Meister Role of the Endothelium on Arterial Vasomotion Biophys. J., June 1, 2005; 88(6): 3845 - 3854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]