Integrative Physiology |
From the Heart and Vascular Research Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, MetroHealth Campus, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Correspondence to David S. Rosenbaum, MD, Director, Heart and Vascular Research Center, MetroHealth Campus, Case Western Reserve University, 2500 MetroHealth Dr, Hamman 322, Cleveland, OH 44109-1998. E-mail drosenbaum{at}metrohealth.org
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
170%) in the maximum spatial
gradient of repolarization, which in turn formed the substrate for
unidirectional block and reentry. However, by providing a structural
anchor for stable reentry, discordant alternans in the presence of a SB
led most often to sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia rather
than to VF, whereas in the absence of a SB discordant alternans caused
VF. SBs facilitate development of discordant alternans between cells
with different ionic properties by electrotonically uncoupling
neighboring regions of myocardium. This may explain why
arrhythmia-prone patients with structural heart disease exhibit T-wave
alternans at lower heart rates. These data also suggest a singular
mechanism by which T-wave alternans forms a substrate for initiation of
both VF and sustained monomorphic ventricular
tachycardia.
Key Words: repolarization reentry alternans
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, we used an experimental model to demonstrate that T-wave alternans is caused by primary alternations in the repolarization phase of the action potential.10 Importantly, above a critical heart rate threshold, repolarization of action potentials from adjacent regions of the ventricle alternated with opposite phase, ie, discordant alternans, causing steep spatial gradients of repolarization that formed an electrophysiological substrate for functional block, reentry, and VF.10 It is noteworthy that discordant alternans occurred under conditions of normal intercellular coupling, indicating that regional differences in cellular ionic properties can overcome electrotonic effects that normally act to synchronize repolarization.12 13 However, the mechanisms responsible for triggering discordant alternans are unknown.
A major unresolved question is why patients with structural heart disease and T-wave alternans are at particularly high risk for ventricular arrhythmias. Clearly, patients with contractile dysfunction constitute the vast majority of cases of sudden cardiac death. Among patients with structural heart disease, those with T-wave alternans are more susceptible to inducible SMVT8 and spontaneous arrhythmic events.8 14 However, the role of structural heart disease in the mechanisms of alternans-induced reentry is unknown. Most forms of myocardial disease are associated with fibrotic barriers,15 alterations of fiber bundle architecture,16 and maldistribution of cardiac gap junctions,17 all of which are expected to produce electric uncoupling between fibers. Because cell-to-cell coupling plays an important role in synchronizing repolarization between cells, we hypothesize that electrotonic uncoupling by structural barriers (SBs) facilitates the development of discordant alternans. This may explain a mechanism by which SBs promote the development of critical dispersions of repolarization that cause functional block and reentry.
To test this hypothesis, we used high-resolution optical mapping in an experimental model of T-wave alternans. This model offered several advantages, as follows. (1) Action potentials could be recorded simultaneously while T-wave alternans was elicited on the ECG. (2) SB could be created with precise control using an argon ion laser in a preparation with previously characterized heterogeneities of repolarization. (3) Propagation, functional block, and dispersions of repolarization could be mapped directly with high spatial resolution. (4) In this model, both monomorphic and polymorphic arrhythmias could be induced. We found that electrotonic uncoupling produced by a SB greatly facilitates the development of discordant alternans, creating critical heterogeneities of repolarization that can form the substrate for a variety of reentrant arrhythmias. These data provide additional evidence linking T-wave alternans to a novel mechanism of arrhythmogenesis.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
800 µm) viable rim of left and right ventricular epicardium
having normal electrophysiological properties was created by
endocardial cryoablation in Langendorff-perfused
hearts.10 18
After staining with voltage-sensitive dye, hearts were placed in an
imaging chamber that maintained uniform temperature, eliminated motion
artifacts without altering electrophysiological properties, and allowed
ECG recordings from the volume conductor
bath.10 18 19
To uncouple neighboring regions of cells having known differences in
cellular restitution
kinetics,20 an insulating SB
was produced by a computer-driven argon laser to produce a 2x10-mm SB
(Figure 1
|
We have developed an optical action potential mapping system that is capable of resolving membrane potential changes as small as 0.5 mV simultaneously from 128 sites across the anterior epicardial surface of the guinea pig ventricle.18 20 21 An optical magnification of x1.2 was used that corresponded to a mapping area of 15x15 mm, 1.25-mm interpixel spatial resolution, and 1-ms temporal resolution.
Repolarization time (RT), activation times, and action potential duration (APD) were determined from previously described algorithms.18 20 Alternans of cellular RT was determined by measuring differences in local RT on consecutive beats. Because the error associated with measurement of RT was 3±4 ms, only RT alternans >10 ms was considered significant. A previously validated spectral analysis technique10 was used to measure ECG T-wave alternans. The method of Bayly et al22 was modified for optically recorded action potential maps to accurately quantify the magnitude and direction of conduction velocity and repolarization gradients at each recording site.
In all hearts (n=26), action potentials were recorded
(Figure 1
) over a broad range of steady-state pacing cycle
lengths (CLs) until one-to-one capture failed or an arrhythmia was
initiated. In each experiment, the left ventricular free wall was
stimulated near the atrioventricular groove
(Figure 1
) to ensure that the sequence of epicardial
activation was nearly identical before and after the introduction of
the SB. This stimulation protocol was repeated in each experiment to
confirm reproducibility of the findings. To ensure that laser energy
did not alter properties of cells outside of the precisely demarcated
SB, validation studies were performed in 15 hearts. Each heart served
as its own control, as the identical stimulation protocol (described
above) was performed before (ie, control) and after a SB was
introduced. APD, repolarization gradients, conduction velocity, and ECG
morphology were compared at the baseline stimulation CL of 400 ms in
the absence and presence of a SB. The effects of SB on cellular
alternans was determined in a subset of 5 of these experiments in which
quantitative analysis of the magnitude and phase of cellular alternans
was compared at each steady-state CL both before and after the
introduction of a SB.
An expanded Materials and Methods section can be found in an online data supplement available at http://www.circresaha.org.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There was no evidence of ischemia either during control or after the introduction of a SB as confirmed by the absence of triangulated action potentials and by histological examination using viability staining.
Effect of SB on Cellular Alternans
The effect of regional uncoupling produced by a SB on
the magnitude and heart rate threshold of action potential alternans is
illustrated in
Figure 2
. Panel A shows a representative example of the
change in cellular alternansheart rate relation at one ventricular
site caused by a SB. Such changes were indicative of cellular alternans
at all recording sites. At relatively slow heart rates (<200 bpm), no
cellular alternans is present either in control or in the presence of
SB. However, above a critical threshold heart rate, RT alternans occurs
and increases markedly as heart rate further increases. Notice that the
heart rate threshold for RT alternans is considerably lower in the
presence of a SB (240 bpm) compared with control (300 bpm).
Consequently, over a broad range of heart rates, the magnitude of RT
alternans is amplified in the presence of a SB. The difference in
cellular alternans produced by the SB is further emphasized by the
superposition of even and odd action potentials shown in panel C. Note
that the heart rate dependence of repolarization alternans in
individual cells was profoundly influenced by the insulating SB located
some distant from the cell. The SB also decreased the heart rate
threshold for T-wave alternans measured from the ECG (not shown),
suggesting that SBs can similarly explain changes in heart rate
alternans relation manifest on the surface ECG.
|
Effect of SB on Discordant Alternans
Between Cells
In this investigation, the alternans heart rate
threshold was defined as the slowest heart rate at which significant
alternans was recorded at one or more ventricular sites, and the heart
rate threshold for discordant alternans occurred at the heart rate at
which 2 sites had significant alternans with opposite phase between
them. As shown in
Figure 2B
, the SB significantly
(P<0.05, Wilcoxon matched
pairs test) decreased the heart rate threshold for discordant alternans
(by 68±28 bpm) compared with controls. Also, in controls, a
progression from no alternans to concordant alternans to discordant
alternans always occurred as heart rate increased. In contrast, in the
presence of a SB, a progression directly from no alternans to
discordant alternans was observed in 80% of experiments. Consequently,
the heart rate that produced discordant alternans in hearts with SBs
(276±6 bpm) was essentially the same as the heart rate that produced
concordant alternans in control hearts (269±17 bpm,
P=0.35). Therefore, a SB
greatly increased the propensity for discordant alternans. Preliminary
experiments performed over long time periods (>3 hours) without
introduction of a SB (ie, time controls) demonstrated stable
electrophysiological properties of this preparation and, importantly,
no change in the heart rate dependence or distribution of cellular
alternans. Therefore, changes in magnitude or phase of cellular
alternans that followed the application of the SB could not be
attributed to degradation of the preparation over time.
We hypothesize that electrically insulating 2 regions of
cells with heterogeneous intrinsic repolarization properties such as
those known to exist across the
epicardium20 will influence
the development of discordant alternans.
Figure 3
demonstrates that electrically uncoupling 2 regions
of functionally distinct myocardium by introducing a SB creates an
anatomic substrate across which discordant alternans can form. Shown
are RT alternans phase plots delineating regions of cells where local
repolarization alternates in a short-long phase
(Figure 3
, black region) or a long-short phase
(Figure 3
, gray region). Areas without significant RT
alternans are represented in white. All plots correspond to the slowest
heart rate at which discordant alternans was recorded. Note that in all
experiments, the SB forms at least a portion (and in experiments 1, 3,
and 5, a large portion) of the line separating regions of cells
alternating with opposite phase. Below each phase plot are
representative action potentials from both the long-short
(Figure 3
, site A) and short-long
(Figure 3
, site B) regions demonstrating discordant
alternans. Importantly, in the absence of a SB, stimulation at the
identical heart rate produced
concordant RT alternans in the
same hearts. Therefore, the SB lowered the heart rate threshold for
discordant alternans.
|
Because of its effect on the phase of RT alternans, the SB
substantially affected spatial gradients of repolarization. Shown in
Figure 4
are isochrone maps representing patterns of
activation, APD, and repolarization for 2 consecutive beats in the
absence and presence of a SB in the same heart and at an identical
heart rate. The pattern of activation is similar from beat to beat both
before and after the introduction of the SB. During control, there is a
gradient of APD oriented in an apex (shortest APD)tobase (longest
APD) direction on both beats
(Figure 4
, left middle panel) as reported
previously.20 In contrast,
the introduction of a SB produces large changes in the orientation and
magnitude of APD gradients from beat to beat
(Figure 4
, right middle panel). The effect on APD accounts
for the large differences in the orientation of repolarization
gradients on consecutive beats
(Figure 4
, right bottom panel) and the larger spatial
dispersion of repolarization as evidenced by the crowding of RT
isochrones
(Figure 4
, compare repolarization maps on right with those on
left).
|
Role of SB on Alternans-Induced
Arrhythmias
To determine the effect of the SB on alternans-induced
reentry, we attempted to induce discordant alternans and arrhythmias in
all 26 hearts. In 15 of these hearts, the arrhythmia-induction protocol
was performed in the absence and presence of a SB, whereas in 11 hearts
the protocol was performed only in the absence of a SB. In all 26
experiments, reentrant VF or SMVT was only initiated after discordant
alternans formed; ie, reentrant excitation never occurred in the
absence of discordant alternans. In the absence of a SB, VF was
initiated in 93% of hearts, whereas SMVT was initiated in only 7%. In
contrast, the presence of a SB resulted in reentrant SMVT in 70% of
hearts and VF in 30%. Therefore, the SB was a significant and specific
factor for the development of SMVT
(
2=11.1,
P<0.001).
Figure 5
illustrates representative examples of the
induction of VF and SMVT in the same heart before and after the
introduction of a SB. Therefore, discordant alternans occurring in the
presence and absence of a SB formed the electrophysiological substrate
for SMVT or VF, respectively.
|
To ascertain the role of discordant alternans in forming an
arrhythmogenic substrate, the maximum repolarization gradient within
the mapping array was measured at baseline (CL=400) and during
discordant alternans at the CL immediately preceding the initiation of
either reentrant VF or SMVT. We found that discordant alternans created
an electrophysiological substrate for unidirectional block by
amplifying gradients of repolarization independent of underlying
structure.
Figure 6
shows the maximum gradient of repolarization
measured within the mapping array at a baseline heart rate of 150 bpm
as compared with during discordant alternans immediately preceding the
initiation of VF (in hearts without a SB) and SMVT (in hearts with a
SB). Notice that the maximum repolarization gradient is significantly
larger preceding SMVT or VF compared with baseline, whereas the maximum
repolarization gradients preceding SMVT and VF are similar. These data
suggest that discordant alternans transforms minor gradients of
repolarization into critical gradients sufficient for development of
functional block that leads to both SMVT and VF. This is illustrated in
the representative example shown in
Figure 7
demonstrating the initiation of reentrant SMVT
after the application of a single premature stimulus (S2) during
discordant alternans. Reentry is immediately preceded by discordant
alternans as shown by the action potential tracings from 2 selected
sites, sites A and B,
(Figure 7
, bottom panel). Notice the large repolarization
gradient between these 2 sites, which are only 5 mm apart. Although the
wavefront propagates successfully along both sides of the SB on the S1
beat, the gradient caused by discordant alternans is of sufficient
magnitude to cause unidirectional block of the premature (S2) beat.
Notice that the wavefront fails to propagate against the repolarization
gradient created by discordant alternans on the basal side of the SB
but does propagate along the apical side. About 130 ms later, the
wavefront reenters the area of functional block in a clockwise
direction and propagates around the SB forming the first beat of
reentry. Similarly, discordant alternans produced critical gradients of
repolarization, which formed the substrate unidirectional block, which
led to reentrant VF when no SB was available to stabilize the reentrant
circuit. Therefore, in the presence of a SB, discordant alternans
underlie the mechanism of SMVT because the SB served as an anchor
around which a stable reentrant circuit could
form.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although results obtained from the guinea pig pacing-induced model of T-wave alternans must be extrapolated cautiously to patients, the model offers several distinct advantages. As is the case in patients, electrical alternans in this model persists over time (ie, alternans are not transient), does not require ischemic damage, and principally involves the T-wave rather than the QRS complex.8 Although spontaneous initiation of VT or VF in patients is often not preceded by visible T-wave alternans as seen in these experimental studies, it is possible that microvolt-level T-wave alternans is present but unrecognized during clinical episodes of sudden cardiac death.8 Finally, cellular alternans elicited by steady-state pacing produces an electrophysiological substrate for reentrant VT and VF,10 which typically lasts indefinitely unless actively terminated by pacing or defibrillation, respectively.18
The effect of the SB on the development of T-wave alternans and arrhythmogenesis was ascertained using optical action potential mapping, which served to monitor the development of cellular alternans both in the absence (ie, control) and presence of a SB. This barrier was produced with a laser to create a well-defined anatomic obstacle that electrically insulated 2 regions of myocardium without altering the electrophysiological properties of cells surrounding the barrier.18 Therefore, our observation of profound changes in cellular repolarization and alternans caused by SBs emphasizes the importance of investigating cell physiology in the intact heart.
Previously, we have shown that the orientation of discordant alternans closely follows heterogeneities of restitution properties between cells10 that are known to exist across guinea pig epicardium,20 suggesting that the reason neighboring regions of cells alternate with opposite phase is that the cells possess different ionic properties. One would predict that in the presence of reduced intercellular coupling, electrotonic forces that normally act to maintain synchronization of repolarization between cells are reduced, thereby enhancing dispersion of repolarization.24 Conversely, several studies have shown that increased coupling attenuates repolarization gradients.12 13 The present investigation demonstrates an independent and important effect of cell-to-cell uncoupling on repolarization. In the presence of minor heterogeneities of repolarization properties between cells, electrotonic uncoupling promotes the development of discordant alternans, which in turn causes marked gradients of repolarization. Importantly, arrhythmias only occurred in the presence of steep repolarization gradients caused by discordant alternans. Discordant alternans has also been reported during ischemia,2 25 in which cell-to-cell coupling is impaired,26 27 further supporting a role of uncoupling in the mechanism of discordant alternans.
There are several lines of evidence indicating that a SB
facilitates the development of discordant alternans. First, in
structurally normal myocardium, concordant alternans always preceded
discordant alternans, whereas in the presence of a SB, a direct
transition from no alternans to discordant alternans occurred. Second,
myocardial cells alternating with opposite phase were typically located
in proximity to the SB
(Figure 3
). Third, the heart rate threshold required to
elicit discordant alternans was reduced significantly by the SB
(Figure 2B
), which was also reflected in the ECG by a
decrease in the T-wave alternans heart rate threshold. This corresponds
well with recent clinical observations that suggest that patients in
whom SMVT can be initiated during electrophysiological study have a
significantly lower heart rate threshold for T-wave alternans compared
with patients with negative electrophysiological
tests.8 23 The
findings in this study provide a possible mechanism explaining these
clinical observations.
Our data suggest that discordant alternans can potentially
form in the following 2 situations: (1) where large heterogeneities in
cellular repolarization properties exist in structurally normal
myocardium and (2) where minor heterogeneities of repolarization exist
in the presence of uncoupling caused by SBs. For example, significant
repolarization heterogeneities may exist in structurally normal
myocardium in the congenital long-QT syndrome in which discordant
alternans has been
documented28 and may explain
the association of long-QT syndrome with torsade de
pointes29 30 and
VF.31 In contrast, hearts of
patients with structural heart disease have reduced cell-to-cell
coupling32 in part because
of interdigitation of fibrous tissue between myocyte
bundles.15 Even though these
patients may have only minor heterogeneities of repolarization between
cells, electrical uncoupling may promote the formation of discordant
alternans. Moreover, the precise relation between the location of a SB
and repolarization gradients may also explain why a scar can predispose
to reentry in some cases but not others. Our data do not suggest that
SBs of any type or having any orientation constitute a requisite
condition for monomorphic and polymorphic reentry. For instance, if a
barrier is made along rather than across the gradients of
repolarization, reentry is not easily induced in this
model.18 Biological
variability in location of repolarization gradients relative to the SB
and pacing site may explain why discordant patterns varied between
experiments
(Figure 3
) and why, in turn, the site of block also varied
(Figure 7
).
The initiation of SMVT, rather than VF, in the presence of a
SB was explained by the barrier serving as an anchor to stabilize a
reentrant circuit
(Figures 5
and 7
). The concept is supported by studies of both
atrial and ventricular reentry. During atrial flutter, the reentrant
circuit can stabilize on structural discontinuities in atria such as
the crista terminalis and eustachian
ridge33 or on the tricuspid
annulus.34 Similarly, in
ventricle, a meandering core of a spiral wave anchors to structures
such as small arteries, which stabilize the
wave.35 Following this
reasoning, it is not surprising that discordant cellular alternans
provided a common mechanism for VF and SMVT in our experiments. Such
findings suggest a singular mechanism by which T-wave alternans forms a
substrate for initiation of VF and polymorphic and monomorphic
VT.
The structural alterations produced by heart disease are obviously much more complex than those of our experimental model. Although a requirement for unidirectional block in these studies, discordant alternans is clearly only one component of a more complex substrate for reentry that is undoubtedly present in patients and other models of reentry. For example, in these experiments a single SB served to promote both discordant alternans and an anchor for monomorphic reentry, whereas in patients it is more likely that multiple SBs produce these effects independently. In addition, our model does not account for potential disease-induced changes in the expression of ionic currents.36 37 However, the physical principles set forth by our experiments should apply to more complex disease states.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 30, 2000; revision received October 6, 2000; accepted October 6, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. de Diego, R. K. Pai, A. S. Dave, A. Lynch, M. Thu, F. Chen, L.-H. Xie, J. N. Weiss, and M. Valderrabano Spatially discordant alternans in cardiomyocyte monolayers Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): H1417 - H1425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Kjolbye, M. Dikshteyn, B. C. Eloff, I. Deschenes, and D. S. Rosenbaum Maintenance of intercellular coupling by the antiarrhythmic peptide rotigaptide suppresses arrhythmogenic discordant alternans Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): H41 - H49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. I. Zhu and C. E. Clancy L-type Ca2+ channel mutations and T-wave alternans: a model study Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): H3480 - H3489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Fossa, T. Wisialowski, J. N. Duncan, S. Deng, and M. Dunne Azithromycin/Chloroquine Combination Does Not Increase Cardiac Instability despite an Increase in Monophasic Action Potential Duration in the Anesthetized Guinea Pig Am J Trop Med Hyg, November 1, 2007; 77(5): 929 - 938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. D. Wilson and D. S. Rosenbaum Mechanisms of arrythmogenic cardiac alternans Europace, November 1, 2007; 9(suppl_6): vi77 - vi82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Pruvot, F. Jousset, P. Ruchat, J.-M. Vesin, Y. Prudat, T. Zerm, and M. Fromer Propagation velocity kinetics and repolarization alternans in a free-behaving sheep model of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation Europace, November 1, 2007; 9(suppl_6): vi83 - vi88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. E. Bondarenko and R. L. Rasmusson Simulations of propagated mouse ventricular action potentials: effects of molecular heterogeneity Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): H1816 - H1832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. E. D. J. ter Keurs and P. A. Boyden Calcium and Arrhythmogenesis Physiol Rev, April 1, 2007; 87(2): 457 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Krogh-Madsen and D. J. Christini Action Potential Duration Dispersion and Alternans in Simulated Heterogeneous Cardiac Tissue with a Structural Barrier Biophys. J., February 15, 2007; 92(4): 1138 - 1149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Hayashi, Y. Shiferaw, D. Sato, M. Nihei, S.-F. Lin, P.-S. Chen, A. Garfinkel, J. N. Weiss, and Z. Qu Dynamic Origin of Spatially Discordant Alternans in Cardiac Tissue Biophys. J., January 15, 2007; 92(2): 448 - 460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Sato, Y. Shiferaw, A. Garfinkel, J. N. Weiss, Z. Qu, and A. Karma Spatially Discordant Alternans in Cardiac Tissue: Role of Calcium Cycling Circ. Res., September 1, 2006; 99(5): 520 - 527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Shusterman, A. Goldberg, and B. London Upsurge in T-Wave Alternans and Nonalternating Repolarization Instability Precedes Spontaneous Initiation of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Humans Circulation, June 27, 2006; 113(25): 2880 - 2887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Weiss, A. Karma, Y. Shiferaw, P.-S. Chen, A. Garfinkel, and Z. Qu From Pulsus to Pulseless: The Saga of Cardiac Alternans Circ. Res., May 26, 2006; 98(10): 1244 - 1253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Bien, L. Yin, and E. Entcheva Calcium Instabilities in Mammalian Cardiomyocyte Networks Biophys. J., April 1, 2006; 90(7): 2628 - 2640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Bian and L. Tung Structure-Related Initiation of Reentry by Rapid Pacing in Monolayers of Cardiac Cells Circ. Res., March 3, 2006; 98(4): e29 - e38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|