Reviews |
From the Institute of Molecular Cardiobiology, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.
Correspondence to Brian ORourke, Johns Hopkins University, 720 Rutland Ave, 844 Ross Building, Baltimore, MD 21205. E-mail bor{at}jhmi.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: KATP protection mitochondria ischemia apoptosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As summarized in
Figure 1
, a variety of intracellular signaling pathways have
been implicated in the protective mechanism of IPC. These include the
activation of G proteinlinked phospholipase Ccoupled receptors,
tyrosine kinase pathways, protein kinase C (PKC), and the generation of
reactive oxygen species. Protection can be blocked at several steps in
each cascade; however, redundancy is built in, so protection can be
preserved through the activation of alternative pathways. The
identification of a common end-effector for protection has been
elusive.
|
Among the candidates as a mediator of protection is the ATP-sensitive potassium channel (KATP). This channel is normally inhibited by intracellular ATP and opens during periods of energy depletion.7 8 9 10 11 KATP channels are found on a wide variety of tissues, and one of their most prominent functions is to modulate insulin release from pancreatic ß cells by setting the resting membrane potential (Er) of the cell. An effect on Er also underlies the mechanism of KATP action in vascular smooth muscle.12 In the heart, KATP channels are present on the sarcolemma of cardiac myocytes, where they were first described,7 8 but their purpose remains unclear. The opening of surface KATP (surfaceKATP) channels in cardiomyocytes has little effect on Er, because it is already close to the equilibrium potential for K+, but the outward current carried by KATP shortens the action potential and, if large enough, can render the cell inexcitable. Thus, it has been suggested that suppression of excitability spares energy by reducing that required for active ion cycling because of membrane depolarization and Ca2+ handling.13
Another KATP channel isoform, which is presumed to be ubiquitously distributed in all cells with mitochondria, is found on the mitochondrial inner membrane (mitoKATP). Recent evidence indicates that this channel may be both a trigger and effector of IPC. This review will compare the pharmacology of mitoKATP with surfaceKATP and discuss the evidence implicating mitoKATP in cellular protection.
| Role of KATP Channels in Acute IPC |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reports that the sulfonylurea receptor antagonists could diminish IPC-induced protection suggested that KATP channels may be effectors of protection, and this idea was reinforced by the finding that KATP channel openers like cromakalin, bimakalim, or pinacidil could mimic protection.3 4 It was also found that 5-hydroxydecanoate (5-HD), a putative ischemia-selective KATP channel inhibitor, could block protection.14 15 16 17
On the basis of these studies, a mechanistic hypothesis was developed proposing that the opening of surfaceKATP channels during ischemia was somehow facilitated by the activation of IPC signaling pathways, such that the action potential shortening that occurs in the early phase of the long ischemia was enhanced. The result would be better preservation of cellular energy stores and suppression of deleterious downstream events, such as cellular Ca2+ overload.
This hypothesis was critically tested in several studies. Yao and Gross18 showed a lack of correlation between the extent of action potential shortening and the reduction of infarct size. Doses of bimakalim,18 cromakalim,19 or BMS-18044820 that had little or no effect on the action potential could still significantly reduce infarct size. Furthermore, preventing ischemic action potential shortening by concomitant treatment with dofetilide did not eliminate protection.21 Finally, in simulated ischemia models of isolated cardiomyocytes, protection was conferred by KATP channel openers, even though the cells were quiescent and no action potentials were being generated.22 Thus, it was necessary to consider alternative explanations for the effects of the KATP channel openers and inhibitors in IPC.
| MitoKATP |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10 pS in 100
mmol/L K+) smaller than the surface
variety.28 The
mitoKATP channel was inhibited by 100 µmol/L
ATP and blocked by glibenclamide or 4-aminopyridine. In reconstitution
studies, mitoKATP was shown to be competitively
inhibited by ATP, ADP, and palmitoyl- or oleyl-CoA, and relief from
inhibition was mediated by GTP and
GDP.23 25 29
Modulator effects require the presence of
Mg2+. Although the excised patch studies
indicated that the ATP inhibitory site was on the matrix face of the
channel, other evidence suggests that it may be on the cytoplasmic
(technically the intermembrane) face. This conclusion was based on the
findings that the channels regulatory sites were all located on one
side of the channel and that GTP and palmitoyl CoA are maximally active
only when applied to the external medium of intact mitochondria and are
presumably not transported into the
matrix.30 Studies of proteins reconstituted into proteoliposomes permitted a direct comparison of the pharmacology of mitoKATP and surfaceKATP channels. Garlid et al24 showed that diazoxide was 1000 to 2000 times more potent in opening the mitoKATP channel compared with the sarcolemmal KATP channel (K1/2 0.5 to 0.8 µmol/L for mitoKATP versus 840 µmol/L for cardiac sarcolemmal KATP). Furthermore, the effect of diazoxide could be blocked by 5-HD with a Ki of 45 to 85 µmol/L. Glibenclamide (Ki 1 to 6 µmol/L) and 5-HD block mitoKATP in a state-dependent manner, having no effect on channels activated by complete removal of ATP, but inhibiting channels activated by GTP or K+ channel openers in the presence of ATP.31
Exploiting the selectivity of diazoxide for the mitochondrial isoform, Garlid et al24 compared the efficacy of diazoxide and cromakalim in protecting Langendorff-perfused rat hearts from ischemic contracture. Diazoxide significantly prolonged the time to ischemic contracture with a half-maximal effect at 8.8 µmol/L, whereas the K1/2 for cromakalim was 11 µmol/L. Importantly, at equally protective doses of the 2 drugs, diazoxide produced markedly less action potential shortening. Both 5-HD (at 100 µmol/L) and glibenclamide abolished the protective effect of diazoxide. Garlid et al24 concluded that the protective effect of KATP openers may be mediated by mitochondrial rather than sarcolemmal KATP channels.
Contemporaneously, Liu et al32 made a similar connection between mitoKATP activation and cardioprotection in isolated cardiomyocytes. By developing a method for monitoring the opening of mitoKATP using the native autofluorescence of mitochondrial flavoproteins, the opening of mitoKATP by diazoxide was detected for the first time in intact cells as a reversible increase in flavoprotein oxidation. At concentrations up to 100 µmol/L, diazoxide dose-dependently increased mitochondrial matrix oxidation (K1/2 27 µmol/L) without activating sarcolemmal KATP currents, and 5-HD inhibited the redox effect. The latter finding provides important support for the argument that mitoKATP channels are involved, because there is substantial evidence that 5-HD is selective for mitoKATP over sarcolemmal KATP.15 24 33 34 The link between mitoKATP and protection in cardiomyocytes was demonstrated by examining the extent of cell killing in response to simulated ischemia using a cell pelleting method.32 Diazoxide decreased cell killing to about one half of that in controls, and this protection was blocked by 5-HD. The latter result was similar to that of Armstrong et al,22 who showed that 5-HD inhibited preconditioning induced by 1 to 3 short pelleting episodes before the long ischemia in the same quiescent cell model.
Using the flavoprotein fluorescence method, the
pharmacological profile of several KATP openers
and inhibitors have been characterized, and compounds have been found
that specifically act on either the mitochondrial or sarcolemmal
KATP channels
(Table
).
In isolated cell models of ischemia, protection is afforded by
compounds capable of activating mitoKATP, and
this protection can be inhibited by compounds effective at blocking
mitoKATP.35 36
Compounds selective for sarcolemmal channels have no such actions and
serve as convincing evidence that sarcolemmal channels play much less
of a role in protection. It should be noted that the specificities
shown in the Table
primarily apply to the case of intact cardiomyocytes
or isolated mitochondria, usually determined with ATP present in the
cytoplasmic solution, and may vary depending on the conditions of the
experiment. For example, the pinacidil derivative P-1075 is quite
selective for surfaceKATP in the isolated
cells35 but potently
activates mitoKATP in mitochondrial preparations
(P. Paucek, personal communication, June 2000) and confers
protection in intact hearts with an EC25 of 57
nmol/L.37 The reason for
this discrepancy is unknown.
|
Similarly, 5-HD was originally reported to block surfaceKATP currents activated by high ADP (1 mmol/L), low pH of 6.6,38 or metabolic inhibition,39 so conclusions about selectivity need to reexamined under many different conditions. Also, under conditions of high ADP or severe metabolic inhibition, surfaceKATP channels are more readily opened by diazoxide;40 however, activation of heterologously expressed SUR2A/Kir6.2 channels by diazoxide is not inhibited by up to 500 µmol/L 5-HD.34 Thus, extrapolation of these pharmacological specificities to other situations should be made with caution, particularly in intact hearts where many cell types are present, and diazoxide is a potent vasodilator through its action on surfaceKATP channels of vascular smooth muscle. Still, by using combinations of old and new selective agonists and antagonists, the hypothesis that mitoKATP is the effector of protection has received widespread support.
Acknowledging the caveat about pharmacological specificity mentioned above, there is remarkably good agreement between isolated cell data and results obtained in whole heart. Protection against infarction by diazoxide or low doses of cromakalim does not seem to be correlated with effects on coronary flow, action potential shortening, or ST segment elevation41 during ischemia. Almost universally, the protection is inhibited by 5-HD. Furthermore, HMR1883 (or its salt form HMR1098), an antagonist selective for surfaceKATP, has no effect on IPC41 42 43 44 45 46 but is effective in blocking reperfusion arrhythmias,43 47 presumably by reducing the dispersion of repolarization caused by the activation of surfaceKATP. 5-HD, on the other hand, does not influence ischemia-related electrical dispersion48 or arrhythmias.49 HMR1883 may also be more selective toward cardiomyocyte, rather than vascular, surfaceKATP channels, because reperfusion hyperemia was blocked by glibenclamide but not HMR1883 in rat hearts.43
A dichotomous recent result suggested that HMR1883 could block diazoxide, but not conventional IPC, in rabbit hearts.41 Interestingly, diminution of ischemic ST segment elevation with successive occlusions was unaffected by doses of 5-HD known to block IPC, but abolished by HMR1883. Thus, this study confirmed the dissociation between surfaceKATP activation and protection while at the same time supporting a surfaceKATP role in diazoxide-induced protection (either that or the HMR1883 was not completely surface selective). These results will need to be reconciled with a report showing no effect of HMR1098 on diazoxide-induced protection in isolated myocytes.35
Assuming that the primary action of 5-HD is on mitoKATP, it is quite remarkable that this compound blocks protection induced by an endless variety of preconditioning protocols, including protection induced by IPC,14 50 51 adenosine,52 53 54 55 56 endothelin,57 nicorandil,36 58 opioids,59 acetylcholine,60 diazoxide,32 44 61 62 63 64 heat shock,65 66 67 Ca2+ preconditioning,62 HpETE,68 renal ischemia,69 monophosphoryl lipid A,70 71 phorbol myristic acid,72 BMS-180448,73 RP52891,16 and volatile anesthetics.74
Although perfect isoform selectivity of KATP openers and blockers has yet to be achieved, all of the pharmacological and electrophysiological results taken together favor mitoKATP rather than surfaceKATP as the relevant effector of preconditioning. This conclusion will be bolstered by the future development of highly isoform-specific and potent drugs. In this regard, a new K+ channel opener, BMS-191095,75 has recently been described that is extremely potent (KD 83 nmol/L) and selective for mitoKATP, has no effect on ischemic action potential shortening, will not open vascular or sarcolemmal KATP channels, and is cardioprotective.76
Another important question is the time frame for mitoKATP channel opening necessary for protection. In a recent study in a rat model of IPC by Fryer et al,44 5-HD was applied either before or after the preconditioning ischemia or diazoxide application to examine whether mitoKATP channel opening exerted its protective effect during the trigger or long ischemia phases or both. In controls, IPC reduced infarct size (normalized to area at risk) from 56% to 7%. When 5-HD was applied 5 minutes before IPC, protection was largely eliminated (infarct size was 40%), whereas in the absence of preconditioning, 5-HD had no significant effect on infarct size. Diazoxide given 15 minutes before the long ischemia reduced infarct size (to 36%), whereas 5-HD applied either before or after diazoxide exposure completely eliminated this protection. This suggests that mitoKATP opening is important as both a preconditioning trigger and effector of protection during the long ischemia (discussed in the context of delayed preconditioning in the next section). Also noted in this study was a diminished effect of 5-HD with longer pretreatment periods, suggesting that 5-HD was being actively metabolized. This result highlights the difficulty of verifying the local concentration of a pharmacological agent at an effector site in vivo, particularly when the site is an intracellular one like the mitochondria and coronary flow is changing during the experiment.
A recent study by Pain et al77 supported the role of mitoKATP as a trigger of IPC but challenged its role as an effector during the long ischemia in perfused rabbit hearts. They found that 5-HD (or glibenclamide) administered during a 5-minute preconditioning ischemia or a short diazoxide pretreatment could block the infarct limiting effect of IPC but was ineffective when given after the preconditioning period. Tyrosine kinase inhibition abrogated diazoxide-induced protection, whereas PKC inhibition did not. In addition, free radical scavengers applied during diazoxide pretreatment were capable of blocking protection, suggesting that mitoKATP opening is an upstream trigger of radical production and tyrosine kinase activation. As discussed by Gross and Fryer,78 these findings will need to be reconciled with several earlier studies demonstrating an effect of 5-HD applied after the preconditioning period.
Although preconditioning in humans is more difficult to verify, several studies have noted a significant effect of KATP channel blockers or openers either in vivo or in explanted human tissues.45 56 79 80 81 82 83 It is reassuring to find that the pharmacological profile described in animal models has been replicated in human myocardium. As reported recently by Ghosh et al,45 hypoxic preconditioning (assessed by prevention of creatine kinase loss) of human atrial tissue could be blocked by previous treatment with glibenclamide or 5-HD, but not HMR1883, and protection was mimicked by diazoxide.
| MitoKATP in Delayed IPC |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent findings indicate that mitoKATP channel opening may be a component of delayed protection. In a rabbit model of delayed preconditioning, protection at 24 hours (conferred by either four 5- or 10-minute ischemia/reperfusion cycles84 or by adenosine treatment85 ) could be eliminated by treatment with glibenclamide or 5-HD given just before the long ischemia. As is consistently found in acute IPC, these blockers did not worsen the extent of injury in the absence of preconditioning, indicating that KATP channels are probably involved in the IPC recruitable protection but do not limit infarct size under normal circumstances.
It is noteworthy that the selectivity of 5-HD for mitoKATP was disputed in the report described above84 and in others85 86 87 on the basis of the observation that action potential shortening was significantly diminished by 5-HD. Similarly, early studies of 5-HD showed inhibition of whole-cell and single-channel KATP currents by 5-HD.38 39 88 Although a direct effect of 5-HD on sarcolemmal KATP may be possible under some conditions, a result demonstrating an effect of 5-HD on action potential shortening or surfaceKATP currents does not necessarily imply that the drug is acting on the surface channel. It is possible, and perhaps to be expected, that a drug acting on mitoKATP, by influencing cellular energy metabolism, could have secondary effects on surfaceKATP. Conversely, agents that are intended to alter subsarcolemmal energy balance, through tight coupling between sarcolemmal and mitochondrial membranes, could potentially influence mitoKATP activity as well. This could provide an alternative explanation to the conclusions of Haruna et al,89 who recently showed that inhibition of Na+/K+ ATPase with digoxin could inhibit the activation of surfaceKATP and abrogate preconditioning but could not inhibit KATP channel opener-mediated protection.
These results were interpreted as evidence that selective surfaceKATP channel inhibition could block protection. Even taking into account possible cross-reactivity of 5-HD with surfaceKATP, its mitochondrial site of action is likely to be the relevant one for protection, because 5-HD can block protection without an effect on ischemic action potential shortening,48 90 and when 5-HD does have an electrophysiological effect, there is still no correlation between the action potential shortening and protection.84 These findings have also been confirmed in a cellular model of IPC. Delayed protection (elicited by brief ischemia or adenosine) at 24 hours can be blocked by 5-HD given just before the long ischemia in a human cardiac cell line.56
Also in support of mitoKATP as an effector of delayed preconditioning is that a single dose of diazoxide, applied 24 hours before a long ischemia, is enough to afford significant protection in rats.91 This protection can be blocked by 5-HD, applied either before diazoxide exposure or 10 minutes before the long ischemia, again supporting the hypothesis that mitoKATP channels are involved in both the trigger phase and in protection during the lethal ischemia. In another study in rabbits, diazoxide mimicked both early and delayed IPC, and 5-HD applied before the long ischemia blocked protection, as did L-NAME, leading to the conclusion that both mitoKATP and nitric oxide (NO) were mediators of protection induced by diazoxide.63
The NO pathway and mitoKATP
activation have been linked in a recent study by Sasaki et
al,92 who showed that NO
donors facilitate the activation of mitoKATP
opening by diazoxide and partially activate the channel directly. A
similar facilitation of mitoKATP opening by PKC
activation was earlier noted by Sato et
al.33 Thus, modulation of
mitoKATP could play a role in both the short-
and long-term memory of IPC. Little is known about how signal
transduction pathways modify mitochondrial targets, but a recent study
by Wang et al93 reported
that one isoform of PKC (PKC-
) is specifically translocated to the
mitochondria after diazoxide treatment. How this finding fits in with
the known participation of other PKC
isoforms2 in protection has
not been determined.
| MitoKATP and Apoptosis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A recent study by Nakamura et al99 showed that IPC blunted the upregulation of Bax protein expression associated with ischemia/reperfusion without altering the levels of Bcl-2. The role of Bax in inducing or Bcl-2 in preventing cytochrome c release from the mitochondrial intermembrane space begs the question of whether mitoKATP activation influences this early trigger of apoptosis. The only published evidence thus far paradoxically suggests that cytochrome c release may be induced by mitoKATP opening. Holmuhamedov and colleagues100 101 reported that in Ca-loaded mitochondria, diazoxide treatment caused mitochondrial swelling, Ca2+ release, and loss of cytochrome c. However, recent findings in cultured neonatal rat myocytes suggest the opposite. Apoptosis induced by H2O2 treatment [assessed by cytochrome c translocation, caspase activation, mitochondrial membrane potential loss, and poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase cleavage] can be inhibited by diazoxide, and 5-HD blocks this protection.102
| Mechanisms of Protection |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Mitochondrial Swelling and Optimization of Respiration |
|---|
|
|
|---|
pH is
largely maintained. Matrix swelling by itself may improve the rate of oxidative metabolism, as previously suggested by Halestrap et al,103 who showed that swelling activated fatty acid oxidation, respiration, and ATP production. If swelling plays a role in improving mitochondrial function, it is worthwhile to consider other factors that may be involved in preventing excess swelling and loss of function. In an earlier model of mitochondrial volume homeostasis described by Garlid and Beavis,104 105 respiration-driven cation influx through mitoKATP might also be accompanied by anion efflux through an inner membrane anion channel, or IMAC, in coordination with the operation of the K+/H+ antiporter. IMAC was therefore suggested to be a safety valve that prevents excessive matrix swelling. In light of recent findings that chloride channel inhibitors may play a role in cardioprotection,106 107 it is intriguing to speculate that a balance between K+ influx and anion efflux may tune the mitochondrion to the optimal volume for preserving function during ischemia and reperfusion.
On the basis of thermodynamic considerations, it has also been theorized that optimal efficiency of oxidative phosphorylation is achieved when mitochondria are partially uncoupled,108 and this idea has been put forward as the purpose of mitochondrial uncoupling proteins.109 By analogy, optimization of respiration may also be the result of the partial uncoupling induced by mitoKATP opening.
Similarly, Fryer et al44 showed that mitochondria isolated from the area at risk of preconditioned hearts had higher rates of ATP synthesis than those of hearts subjected to long ischemia alone and that this preservation of mitochondrial function could be partially inhibited by 5-HD, supporting improved ATP production as a common feature of IPC and KATP channel openers.
| Mitochondrial Ca2+ Handling |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It was suggested that the mechanism of decreased
Ca2+ uptake by
mitoKATP opening was attributable to a decreased
driving force for Ca2+ entry. From a
baseline resting potential of -195 mV in the isolated mitochondria,
the KATP openers depolarized 
by 15 to 20
mV, and this effect was not inhibited by cyclosporin
A.101
These interesting results raise several questions that will
require additional investigation. Why was the
K1/2 for inhibition of
Ca2+ uptake 65 µmol/L for diazoxide,
100 times higher than the K1/2 for
K+ uptake via
mitoKATP as reported by Garlid et
al24 ? What is the nature of
the Ca2+ release mechanism? Why is there a
permeability transition and cytochrome
c release if diazoxide protects
against apoptosis?
| Free Radicals and Redox State |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Interestingly, the generation of ROS during reperfusion, presumed to contribute to irreversible cellular injury, was attenuated by adenosine preconditioning or pinacidil applied just at the time of reperfusion. This protection was eliminated in the presence of 5-HD or an inhibitor of PKC.113 Thus, mitoKATP opening could either enhance or attenuate mitochondrial ROS production, depending on the phase of preconditioning, ischemia, or reperfusion. Using a ROS-sensing microprobe, Obata et al114 also demonstrated that cromakalim or nicorandil increased hydroxyl radical production in rat myocardium. The effect was inhibited by 5-HD or glibenclamide. The link between mitoKATP opening, ROS generation, and PKC remains incompletely defined at present. MitoKATP opening seems to increase ROS production, which may in turn activate PKC, but the mitoKATP channel is also modulated by these factors.33 92 In a recent study by Wang et al,93 diazoxide induced PKC translocation and protection in Langendorff-perfused rat hearts and these responses could be blocked by PKC inhibitors. In contrast, Miura et al115 reported that the PKC inhibitor calphostin C could block adenosine-, but not diazoxide-mediated cardioprotection.
| Other Mechanisms |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Another possible mechanism involving mitoKATP and the actin cytoskeleton was suggested by Baines et al,118 who found that cytochalasin D, a disrupter of the cytoskeleton, could eliminate protection conferred by diazoxide, pinacidil, or IPC in isolated adult cardiomyocytes subjected to simulated pelleting ischemia. Furthermore, anisomysin, a p38/JNK activator, decreased osmotic fragility in a 5-HDsensitive manner.
| KATP Isoforms in Heart |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A study by Susuki et
al122 suggested that
antibodies raised against a 12 amino acid stretch of Kir6.1
immunolocalize to mitochondria, implying that this isoform may be
present on the inner membrane. In a recent test of whether Kir6.1 is an
essential component of mitoKATP,
dominant-negative adenoviruses, in which the pore signature sequence
GFG was mutated to AFA in Kir6.1 and Kir6.2, were constructed to knock
out current carried by SUR/Kir6.x
channels.123 The AFA
mutation eliminates the ability of the channel to conduct
K+ but does not prevent it from coassembling
with native KATP channels. These constructs
selectively suppressed surface currents carried by their wild-type
counterparts when coinfected into A549
cells.123 The 6.2AFA virus,
but not the 6.1AFA virus, could also suppress native sarcolemmal
KATP current in isolated rabbit cardiomyocytes.
Notably, infection of adult myocytes with the dominant-negative
Kir6.1AFA subunit had no effect on the mitochondrial redox response to
diazoxide, indicating that it is unlikely that Kir6.1 is part of
mitoKATP.124
However, this does not preclude the possibility that a Kir6.1-like
subunit, with antigenic similarity to 6.1 but without the ability to
heteromultimerize with its surface counterpart, could still contribute
to the mitoKATP channel structure. In this
regard, recent work by Liu et
al125 indicates that among
the combinations of known SUR and Kir subunits expressed heterologously
as surface channels, only SUR1/Kir6.1 fits the pharmacological profile
for mitoKATP (as defined in intact rabbit
myocytes; see the Table
).
Isoform-specific localization of the binding sites for KATP channel openers and inhibitors may provide some insight into the structure of mitoKATP. To fit the pharmacological profile of mitoKATP, one would look for a combination of SUR/Kir subunits that is readily opened by diazoxide, nicorandil, cromakalin, and pinacidil (and, perhaps, P1075) and is sensitive to inhibition by glibenclamide and 5-HD. In this context, recent evidence using chimeras of SUR1 (the pancreatic isoform potently activated by diazoxide) and SUR2A (insensitive to diazoxide), both coexpressed with Kir6.2, indicates that diazoxide sensitivity may be conferred by a region comprised of SUR1 transmembrane domains 6 to 11 interacting with its first nucleotide binding fold.126 Cromakalin and pinacidil, which readily open SUR2A/Kir6.2 channels, interact with a region spanning transmembrane domains 12 to 17 of SUR2A,126 and the inhibitory binding site of sulfonylureas is also in this area.127 The critical residues for pinacidil binding were additionally narrowed by Uhde et al,128 who showed that P1075 binding involved regions including amino acids 1059 to 1087 and 1218 to 1320 of SUR2.
The relatively small 42 amino acid carboxy-terminal divergence between the splice variants SUR2A and SUR2B129 contributes to major differences in KATP opener sensitivity. Not only is SUR2B sensitive to diazoxide, but nicorandil is more than 100 times more potent at opening this isoform as compared with SUR2A, whereas both are equally sensitive to pinacidil.130
Regarding the effects of different Kirs on the KATP pharmacology, Russ et al131 reported that glibenclamide binding to SUR2B is enhanced by coexpression of Kir6.1, although the KD for binding was about 7 times lower than the Ki for channel inhibition. Koster and colleagues132 133 showed that mutations of Kir6.2 altered the nucleotide sensitivity of the channel and activation by phosphatidyl inositol 4,5-bisphosphate. The N-terminus of Kir has been implicated in the coupling of sulfonylurea-bound SUR to the stabilization of the channel-closed state.127 Conductance and gating of the channel is also conferred by the Kir subunit. In a study by Kondo et al134 using chimeras of Kir6.1 and Kir6.2, the extracellular linker domain between the membrane-spanning regions determined conductance (80 pS in Kir6.2 and 35 pS in Kir6.1 when coexpressed with SUR2A), whereas the N- and C-terminal regions were implicated in spontaneous opening in the absence of intracellular ATP (not present in Kir6.1).
Reconstruction of the known properties of mitoKATP from structure-function studies of surface channels may provide clues toward the molecular structure of mitoKATP but will require additional elucidation of the isoform-specific differences in 5-HD sensitivity, conductance, and regulation.
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
If the mitoKATP hypothesis holds up to future scrutiny, the question remains as to what the role of surfaceKATP is in the cardioprotection. Because mitoKATP seems to mediate the extra protection associated with preconditioning but does not seem to affect injury in the absence of preconditioning, it is possible that surfaceKATP provides a baseline level of resistance to damage. Because surfaceKATP channel opening may also be arrhythmogenic on reperfusion, defining its true role in ischemia and reperfusion is critical.
The mechanism of mitoKATP protection may involve alterations in mitochondrial Ca2+ handling, the optimization of energy production, and modulation of ROS production during ischemia or reperfusion. It is not known which of these factors is important in vivo. Also to be resolved is the relationship between mitoKATP opening and protein kinase action. Recent findings indicate that mitoKATP channels are modulated by PKC and NO but may also trigger the translocation and activation of PKC or activate tyrosine kinases.
The molecular cloning of mitoKATP has not yet been achieved and has been hampered by uncertainty about the molecular determinants of intracellular targeting of transmembrane proteins. Until it is cloned, it is only possible to draw structural inferences about mitoKATP from known properties of surfaceKATP.
Despite many unanswered questions, recent experimental findings and drug developments support the feasibility of specifically recruiting the natural defenses of the cell and will likely lead to new therapeutic strategies in the near future.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received August 4, 2000; revision received September 29, 2000; accepted September 29, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|