Cellular Biology |
From the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Center for Cardiovascular Biology & Medicine, Kings College London, St Thomas Hospital, London, UK.
Correspondence to Lindsay R. Queen, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Center for Cardiovascular Biology & Medicine, Kings College London, St Thomas Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK. E-mail lindsay.queen{at}kcl.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: blood platelets nitric oxide synthase adrenoceptors adenosine cyclic monophosphate
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
NO inhibits platelet adhesion to vascular endothelium3 and platelet aggregation,4 through activation of soluble guanylyl cyclase and a consequent increase in cGMP. Indeed, NO generation by platelets may act as a negative feedback mechanism to regulate platelet aggregation after a proaggregatory stimulus.5 Furthermore, Freedman et al6 demonstrated that platelet-derived NO plays an important role in the regulation of platelet recruitment. Thus, platelet-derived NO may have important antithrombotic and antiatherogenic roles in vivo. It has been reported that patients with atherosclerosis have reduced eNOS expression and NO production by the vascular endothelium.7 These patients also exhibit an impaired inhibition of platelet aggregation,8 and this may be due partly to a reduction in NO generation by the endothelium but also to a decrease in NO production by platelets themselves. Indeed, reduced platelet NO generation has been shown in patients with acute coronary syndromes.9
ß-Adrenoceptors (ßARs) are present on human platelets and have been characterized to be of the ß2 subtype as determined by radioligand binding.10 11 12 They are coupled to adenylyl cyclase and, when stimulated with isoproterenol, cause an increase in intracellular cAMP concentration,12 which in turn causes inhibition of aggregation,13 although no data exist on the effect of ßARs on platelet adhesion. Furthermore, no direct link has been shown between ßAR stimulation and NO release in platelets. In contrast to the lack of such data in platelets, we have recently reported that ß2AR stimulation or cAMP elevation by other means gives rise to NOS activation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), and that ß2AR-mediated vasorelaxation in human umbilical vein rings is endothelium- and NO-dependent.14 Isoproterenol-induced NOS activation in HUVECs occurs partly through the cAMPprotein kinase A pathway and partly through a tyrosine kinasemediated mechanism.15
The main objective of the present study was to determine if ßAR stimulation or cAMP elevation can activate the L-arginine/NO pathway in human platelets. We also wished to determine whether the functional responses of platelets to ßAR stimulation could be explained, in part or in total, by NOS activation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Determination of NOS Activity
NOS activity in platelets was assessed by measuring the
conversion of L-[3H]-arginine to
L-[3H]-citrulline (method modified
from Chen and Mehta17 ). Platelet suspensions were
incubated with 1.0 µCi
L-[3H]-arginine, in the absence or
presence of
NG-monomethyl-L-arginine
(L-NMMA) 100 µmol/L, CaCl2 1 mmol/L,
or the cAMP inhibitor SQ22536 50
µmol/L18 19 (15 minutes, 37°C). Isoproterenol
1 µmol/L, forskolin 1 µmol/L, or vehicle was added and
incubation continued for an additional 25 minutes. Platelet lysates
were mixed with Dowex cation exchange resin (Na+
form), and L-[3H]-citrulline in the
supernatant was measured by liquid scintillation counting.
L-citrulline formation was calculated from the following
equation:
![]() | (1) |
To determine the ßAR subtype selectivity of responses observed, incubations with isoproterenol were performed in the absence or presence of 300 nmol/L CGP20712A (a selective ß1AR antagonist)20 or 100 nmol/L ICI118551 (a selective ß2AR antagonist).21 22
Assessment of Changes in Cytoplasmic Ca2+
Platelets were loaded with fura 2-AM as previously
described,16 then incubated with 1 µmol/L
isoproterenol, 1 µmol/L forskolin, or 1 U/mL thrombin (as a
positive control). Changes in cytoplasmic Ca2+
were examined as a function of time, from the ratio of emission at 510
nm after excitation at 340 and 380 nm, in an LS50 luminescence
spectrometer.16
Measurement of Platelet Aggregation
Platelet aggregation was measured turbidimetrically using a
Payton dual-channel aggregometer, as previously
described.23 PRP was incubated with phentolamine
10 µmol/L (a nonselective
-adrenergic antagonist)
for 30 seconds before addition of
NG-nitro-L-arginine
methyl ester (L-NAME) 100 µmol/L, CGP20712A 300 nmol/L,
ICI118551 100 nmol/L, or vehicle. After 60 seconds, isoproterenol (1
nmol/L to 10 µmol/L) or vehicle was added and incubated for an
additional 60 seconds. Aggregation was stimulated with a predetermined,
submaximal concentration of
15S-hydroxy-11
,9
-epoxymethanoprosta-5Z,13E-dienoic
acid (U46619, concentration range 0.5 to 1.3 µmol/L). Results
were expressed as the percentage of inhibition of aggregation compared
with the control sample (U46619 alone).
Measurement of Platelet Adhesion
Platelets were labeled with indium-111-oxine as previously
described.24 Radiolabeled platelets were added to
HUVEC monolayers in the presence of either L-NAME 100 µmol/L,
CGP20712A 300 nmol/L, ICI118551 100 nmol/L, or vehicle and incubated
for 5 minutes at 37°C. Isoproterenol 1 µmol/L or vehicle was
added and incubation continued for 15 minutes. Platelet adhesion
was stimulated by 3 mU/mL thrombin, and after an additional 15 minutes,
HUVEC monolayers were washed to remove unattached platelets,
solubilized, and radioactivity counted. The percentage of platelets
bound was calculated from the following equation:
![]() | (2) |
Statistical Analysis
All experiments were performed in triplicate, and the mean of
each triplicate was used for further statistical analysis. Data
were analyzed using repeated-measures ANOVA and expressed as
mean±SEM. Statistical significance was taken as P<0.05
(two-sided).
An expanded Materials and Methods section is available online at http://www.circresaha.org.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Results for basal and isoproterenol- and forskolin-stimulated
L-citrulline production were not different in the
absence or presence of Ca2+ (1 mmol/L).
Furthermore, SQ22536 50 µmol/L abolished the increase in
L-citrulline seen with isoproterenol and forskolin (n=6,
P<0.02 for each), although it had no effect on basal
L-citrulline production (Figure 1
). Coincubation with L-NMMA 100
µmol/L decreased the radioactivity found in the
L-citrulline fraction in control incubations and
prevented the increase in L-citrulline formation
by isoproterenol 1 µmol/L (Table 1
).
|
|
To determine whether the ßAR-mediated increase in
L-[3H]-citrulline
production was mediated through ß1ARs
or ß2ARs, we performed a larger series of
experiments (n=25) with CGP20712A 300 nmol/L (a
ß1AR-selective
antagonist)20 or ICI118551 100 nmol/L (a
ß2AR-selective
antagonist).21 22 Coincubation with CGP20712A
did not affect L-[3H]-citrulline
production in response to isoproterenol. By contrast, in the
presence of ICI118551, isoproterenol did not increase
L-[3H]-citrulline formation above
control values, suggesting that the activation of NOS by isoproterenol
was mediated exclusively through ß2ARs (Figure 2
).
|
Cytoplasmic Ca2+ in Platelets
Because eNOS can be activated by an increase in
cytoplasmic Ca2+, experiments were performed to
determine whether ßAR stimulation or adenylyl cyclase activation
increases intraplatelet Ca2+. Changes in
intracellular Ca2+ were examined using
platelets loaded with the fluorescent dye fura 2-AM (n=3).
No change in intracellular Ca2+ was detected in
platelets treated with isoproterenol 1 µmol/L or forskolin
1 µmol/L (Figures 3A
and 3B
). By contrast, intracellular Ca2+
increased in response to thrombin 1 U/mL, which was used as a positive
control (Figure 3C
).
|
Platelet Aggregation
To determine the functional significance of
ß2AR-mediated NOS activation in platelets,
experiments were performed to study the inhibition of U46619-induced
platelet aggregation by isoproterenol and the effect of concomitant
inhibition of NOS (n=11). Isoproterenol (1 nmol/L to 10 µmol/L)
inhibited U46619-induced aggregation in a concentration-dependent
manner. The response was not affected by coincubation with CGP20712A
300 nmol/L but was abolished by ICI118551 100 nmol/L, confirming that
the effect of isoproterenol was mediated solely through
ß2ARs (Figure 4
).
Coincubation with L-NAME 100 µmol/L did not sig- nificantly
alter the antiaggregatory effect of isoproterenol (Table 2
).
|
|
Platelet Adhesion
Adhesion of indium-111labeled platelets to HUVEC monolayers
was measured in 12-well plates. In the absence of isoproterenol,
thrombin 3 mU/mL resulted in 2.2±0.2% adhesion to HUVECs (n=7).
Coincubation with isoproterenol 1 µmol/L decreased platelet
adhesion to 1.3±0.2% (P<0.01 versus control). We found
that L-NAME abolished this response to isoproterenol (Figure 5
). CGP20712A 300 nmol/L did not affect
the adhesion response to isoproterenol (1.5±0.3%, P>0.05
versus isoproterenol alone). However, in the presence of ICI118551 100
nmol/L, the inhibition of platelet adhesion by isoproterenol was
abolished (2.5±0.2%, P<0.001 versus isoproterenol alone),
confirming that the inhibitory effect of isoproterenol on
platelet adhesion was mediated exclusively through
ß2ARs.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ßARs on human platelets have been identified and characterized as being ß2ARs in type,10 11 26 but the function of these receptors has not been fully elucidated. Studies have shown that stimulation of platelet ßARs increases intracellular cAMP and inhibits aggregation,12 13 27 although no data exist on the effects of ßARs on platelet adhesion. Our study provides the first direct evidence that ßAR stimulation activates platelet NOS. Stimulation of ßARs in platelets with isoproterenol elicited an increase in the conversion of L-arginine to L-citrulline, a response that was abolished by coincubation of the platelets with L-NMMA. The increased NOS activity was attributable solely to ß2AR-subtype activation, because the response to isoproterenol was prevented by coincubation with the ß2AR antagonist ICI118551 but not with the ß1AR antagonist CGP20712A. Furthermore, increased NOS activity was also observed with forskolin, a direct activator of adenylyl cyclase, and the adenylyl cyclase inhibitor SQ22536 abolished the NOS responses to both isoproterenol and forskolin. This suggests that ß2ARs activate NOS through an increase in cAMP. This contrasts with our recently reported findings in HUVECs, in which isoproterenol increased NOS activity partly through cAMP elevation and partly through a tyrosine kinasemediated mechanism.15
The increased NOS activity observed in the presence of isoproterenol and forskolin was not accompanied by a measurable increase in intraplatelet Ca2+, as determined by fura 2-AM fluorescence. In addition, isoproterenol- and forskolin-mediated NOS activation was not different in the absence or presence of Ca2+ in the incubation medium. These results accord with previously published observations by Lantoine et al,28 who demonstrated that stimulation of NO production in platelets with collagen was not associated with a corresponding increase in cytosolic Ca2+. These findings suggest that NOS stimulation in platelets need not involve Ca2+ influx and calmodulin activation. We have previously shown that ß2ARs activate eNOS in HUVECs (the only NOS isoform present in these cells), and that this activation is similarly Ca2+-independent.14 Ca2+-independent activation of eNOS has also been observed in response to shear stress and can be ascribed to serine phosphorylation of eNOS by Akt, resulting in increased Ca2+ sensitivity.29 An increase in eNOS sensitivity to Ca2+ may explain our present findings in platelets, although a possible role of iNOS cannot be excluded.
Isoproterenol caused a concentration-dependent inhibition of platelet aggregation through activation of ß2ARs. These results are in agreement with previous studies,12 13 which have demonstrated that isoproterenol inhibits platelet aggregation through accumulation of cAMP. However, we found that NOS inhibition with L-NAME did not significantly affect the antiaggregatory action of isoproterenol. Although the maximal antiaggregatory effect (Emax) of isoproterenol was slightly lower in the presence of L-NAME, this was not significant. By contrast, ß2AR activation inhibited thrombin-stimulated platelet adhesion to endothelial monolayers, and this effect was abolished by L-NAME. The precise mechanism by which ßAR-mediated NOS-dependent inhibition of adhesion occurs, with no observable change in platelet aggregation, remains to be elucidated. It is possible, for example, that differential effects are exerted on the expression or function of glycoprotein Ib compared with IIb/IIIa in our system; however, no published evidence exists on possible effects of ßAR stimulation or of NOS on these glycoproteins. Nevertheless, previous studies have shown that stimulation of NO in platelets inhibits their adhesion to intact endothelial monolayers.30 31 Our study provides the first direct evidence that ßARs inhibit platelet adhesion, and that they do so through generation of NO.
In our platelet adhesion studies, we examined the effect of isoproterenol on platelets in the presence of HUVECs. We have previously shown that ß2AR stimulation activates the L-arginine/NO system in HUVECs.14 It is likely, therefore, that the NO generated in our system after ßAR stimulation derives from both the platelets and the endothelial cells. We cannot, from our experiments, define the precise contributions of ßAR-mediated NOS activation from platelets and HUVECs, separately, to the adhesion response. If we were to incubate platelets alone with isoproterenol, and subsequently to transfer the platelets to endothelial cells for the adhesion assays, it would be necessary to remove the isoproterenol before the transfer. By doing so, any platelet-generated NO (which is short-lived) would be removed concomitantly. Nevertheless, our data demonstrate that ßAR-mediated NOS-dependent inhibition of platelet adhesion to vascular endothelium is likely to be of physiological relevance. In vivo, catecholamines (derived from sympathetic stimulation) will act simultaneously on the vessel wall and on platelets within the lumen, which are in close proximity. This may be an important mechanism by which platelet adhesion is regulated and the antithrombotic properties of the vessel wall are maintained in vivo.
ß2AR-mediated inhibition of adhesion and
aggregation in platelets may partially offset the proaggregatory
effects of
AR stimulation in response to the endogenous
catecholamines norepinephrine and
epinephrine.32 In vivo, circulating plasma
concentrations of epinephrine and norepinephrine
range between 0.1 to 0.5 nmol/L and 0.3 to 3.0 nmol/L, respectively.
These levels are much lower than the reported affinity of these
catecholamines for
ARs33 and
ßARs.13 However, in times of severe stress, for example,
during myocardial infarction, circulating epinephrine and
norepinephrine concentrations may reach considerably higher
levels (
10 nmol/L).33 Such high
catecholamine concentrations may contribute to the
platelet aggregation seen in unstable angina and myocardial
infarction through
AR stimulation,34 35 and, at those
concentrations, significant activation of ß2ARs
may also occur, which will potentially offset the
AR-mediated
effects. The precise mechanism whereby ß2AR
stimulation inhibits platelet aggregation remains to be elucidated.
However, our results suggest that NO generation mediates the effects of
ß2AR stimulation on platelet adhesion to
the vascular endothelium.
We have previously shown that ß2AR stimulation in human vascular endothelial cells causes activation of the L-arginine/NO system.14 Although the present study reveals similar effects in platelets, additional studies will be needed to determine whether the responses in platelets correspond closely with those in the vascular endothelium. In disease states associated with endothelial dysfunction, such as hypercholesterolemia,36 diabetes37 and atherosclerosis,7 38 reduced NO production by both the endothelium and platelets may predispose to thrombotic events. Freedman et al9 showed that in patients with coronary atherosclerosis, platelet-derived NO production is impaired. Martina et al39 reported that platelets from patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus have reduced NOS activity. However, platelet ßAR function has not been determined in these conditions, and it remains to be seen whether these receptor responses are impaired in parallel, in endothelium and platelets.
In conclusion, we have shown that ßAR stimulation or cAMP elevation increases NOS activity in platelets, and that this occurs with no detectable change in intracellular Ca2+. In functional assays, ßAR stimulation causes inhibition of platelet aggregation and platelet adhesion to endothelial monolayers. ßAR-mediated platelet adhesion to vascular endothelial cells, but not platelet aggregation, is dependent on integrity of the L-arginine/NO system. Furthermore, all the measured responses to isoproterenol are mediated exclusively through ß2AR-subtype activation. These results provide the first direct evidence that ß2ARs can activate NOS in human platelets, through cAMP elevation. The physiological and pathophysiological relevance of these findings remains to be determined.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received April 3, 2000; accepted June 1, 2000.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and ß-adrenergic receptors linked to human platelet
adenylate cyclase. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch
Pharmacol. 1978;302:285291.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Gkaliagkousi, J. Ritter, and A. Ferro Platelet-Derived Nitric Oxide Signaling and Regulation Circ. Res., September 28, 2007; 101(7): 654 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Goubareva, E. Gkaliagkousi, A. Shah, L. Queen, J. Ritter, and A. Ferro Age decreases nitric oxide synthesis and responsiveness in human platelets and increases formation of monocyte-platelet aggregates Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2007; 75(4): 793 - 802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Engeli, M. Boschmann, F. Adams, G. Franke, K. Gorzelniak, J. Janke, F. C. Luft, and J. Jordan Dissociation between Adipose Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression and Tissue Metabolism J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2007; 92(7): 2706 - 2711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ji, G. Ferracci, A. Warley, M. Ward, K.-Y. Leung, S. Samsuddin, C. Leveque, L. Queen, V. Reebye, P. Pal, et al. beta-Actin regulates platelet nitric oxide synthase 3 activity through interaction with heat shock protein 90 PNAS, May 22, 2007; 104(21): 8839 - 8844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Connors, D. E. Crowell, C. G. Eberhart, J. Copeland, C. J. Newschaffer, S. J. Spence, and A. W. Zimmerman {beta} 2-Adrenergic Receptor Activation and Genetic Polymorphisms in Autism: Data from Dizygotic Twins J Child Neurol, November 1, 2005; 20(11): 876 - 884. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S. Monraats, N. M.M. Pires, W. R.P. Agema, A. H. Zwinderman, A. Schepers, M. P.M. de Maat, P. A. Doevendans, R. J. de Winter, R. A. Tio, J. Waltenberger, et al. Genetic Inflammatory Factors Predict Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Circulation, October 18, 2005; 112(16): 2417 - 2425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Brain and A. D. Grant Vascular Actions of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide and Adrenomedullin Physiol Rev, July 1, 2004; 84(3): 903 - 934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. O'Kane, L. R. Queen, Y. Ji, V. Reebye, P. Stratton, G. Jackson, and A. Ferro Aspirin modifies nitric oxide synthase activity in platelets: effects of acute versus chronic aspirin treatment Cardiovasc Res, July 1, 2003; 59(1): 152 - 159. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Hines, Q. Zen, S. N. Burney, D. A. Shea, K. I. Ataga, E. P. Orringer, M. J. Telen, and L. V. Parise Novel epinephrine and cyclic AMP-mediated activation of BCAM/Lu-dependent sickle (SS) RBC adhesion Blood, April 15, 2003; 101(8): 3281 - 3287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |