Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2000;86:768-773

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Methods
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rutledge, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, I. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rutledge, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, I. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipids
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors
(Circulation Research. 2000;86:768.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Integrative Physiology

Direct Visualization of Lipid Deposition and Reverse Lipid Transport in a Perfused Artery

Roles of VLDL and HDL

J. C. Rutledge, A. E. Mullick, G. Gardner, I. J. Goldberg

From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (J.C.R., A.E.M., G.G.), University of California, Davis, and Department of Medicine (I.J.G.), Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York.

Correspondence to John C. Rutledge, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, One Shields Dr, TB 172, Davis, CA 95616. E-mail jcrutledge{at}ucdavis.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—The major goal of this study was to determine the interactions of VLDL surface and core lipids with the artery wall. We first demonstrated in vitro that surface lipid in VLDL could be traced using the phospholipid-like fluorescent probe 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethyl-indocarbocyanine (DiI). The core of VLDL particles was traced by fluorescently labeling apolipoprotein B with TRITC. The labeled VLDLs were perfused through rat carotid arteries, and accumulation of the fluorescently labeled VLDL components in the arterial walls was determined by quantitative fluorescence microscopy. Addition of lipoprotein lipase increased the accumulation of both DiI and TRITC by >2.3-fold. Histological examination showed that DiI and TRITC were primarily localized to the endothelial layer; however, DiI also accumulated as small "lakes" deeper in the artery, in a subendothelial position. Addition of HDL to the perfusion decreased the accumulation of surface lipid and apolipoprotein B–containing particles and eliminated the DiI lakes. Moreover, the increase in endothelial layer permeability associated with lipolysis was attenuated 21% by HDL. If VLDL surface lipid first was allowed to accumulate in the arterial wall, its subsequent rate of loss was more than twice as fast if HDL was included in the perfusate. These studies directly demonstrate atherogenic effects of VLDL lipolysis and their inhibition by HDL.


Key Words: triglycerides • atherosclerosis • lipoproteins • apolipoprotein B • cholesterol


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The key initial event in atherogenesis is the accumulation of lipid within the vessel wall. This is thought to result from retention of apolipoprotein B–containing lipoprotein particles,1 because they bind to negatively charged matrix proteins such as proteoglycans that are found in the artery wall.2 Non–lipoprotein-associated lipids are also found in lesions. More than a decade ago, Lupu et al3 identified lipid that was not associated with lipoprotein-like particles in early lesions. These "lipid whorls" contain phospholipid and some free cholesterol. The origin of this lipid is unknown.

The mechanisms by which triglyceride-containing lipoproteins, VLDL and chylomicrons, are atherogenic are unclear. It is unlikely that these large particles directly enter the arterial wall. However, several other processes that occur during the metabolism of these lipoproteins along the arterial wall are potentially atherogenic. These include the following. (1) Unlike nascent triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, the smaller remnants may infiltrate into the vessel.4 (2) Lipolysis of triglycerides might compromise the barrier function of the endothelial layer.5 6 (3) Lipids that are dissociated from the surface of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins may accumulate within the artery.5 (4) VLDL and chylomicron remnants could be selectively retained in the artery wall.7

HDLs are inversely correlated with the development of complications of atherosclerosis, such as myocardial infarction.8 9 However, thus far, there has been no direct demonstration that HDL will remove lipids from the artery wall. Therefore, the reverse cholesterol transport pathway as a protective effect of HDL must be considered hypothetical. Additionally, HDL has a number of other protective actions in vitro: HDLs contain antioxidant enzymes such as paraoxonase,10 and HDLs may reduce LDL association with matrix proteins.11 Further, in vivo data show that HDLs are a marker for other lipoprotein abnormalities, and, in some studies, HDL is positively correlated with the removal rate of postprandial lipoproteins.12 13

Despite a large body of in vitro data on the interactions of lipoproteins with cultured cells, there are limited data directly assessing the effects of lipoproteins and lipolysis products on whole arteries. Lipoprotein lipase (LpL) is located primarily on capillary endothelial cells, and immunohistological studies also have shown this protein on macrophages and smooth muscle cells within atherosclerotic plaques.14 15 Our data show that surface lipid accumulates in the intimal layer partially in the form of small regions that have been termed "lakes." HDL abrogated lipolysis-induced changes in endothelial layer permeability and removed VLDL-derived surface lipid from the artery wall. Therefore, the first step in reverse lipid transport could be observed within an intact artery.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Transfer of Fluorescent Probes During Lipolysis
To assess the movement of VLDL surface and core lipid during lipolysis, VLDL was labeled with 2 different fluorescent probes: 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethyl-indocarbocyanine (DiI) and cholesteryl BODIPY-FL C12 (Molecular Probes, Inc). BODIPY cholesterol is a more hydrophobic molecule and will trace esterified cholesterol that is found in the core of the lipoprotein.16 Ten micrograms of protein of DiI- or BODIPY-FL cholesteryl ester–labeled VLDL was incubated in 150 µL of PBS or PBS-1% BSA for 2 hours at 37°C. The incubations were carried out with and without addition of 1 µg of purified bovine LpL and 10 µg of human HDL protein. The solutions were separated at 4°C by ultracentrifugation in 6-mL tubes using a Beckman 40.3 rotor; VLDL was isolated at d<1.006 g/mL, and LDL plus IDL was subsequently isolated at a density of 1.063 g/mL. Recovered fluorescence then was determined in each fraction.

Measurement of Macromolecule Accumulation
The perfused artery preparation and experimental apparatus are as we have described previously.6 17 18 Several measurements were made during and after perfusion of each carotid artery with fluorescently labeled molecules (Figure 1Down).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Measurement of fluorescence intensity during perfusion of VLDL labeled with DiI. a, Control (baseline) fluorescence intensity (If) obtained during perfusion of the nonfluorescent buffer solution. b, Perfusion of the buffer solution containing DiI-VLDL, where Ifo represents the fluorescence intensity of the DiI-VLDL perfusate initially filling the artery lumen. c, Washout of the fluorescent VLDL solution with nonfluorescent solution. Absence of fluorescence in the buffer solution is the reason for the drop in fluorescence intensity in this short time period ({approx}5 seconds). d, VLDL efflux from the artery wall; LpL effect of treatment with LpL on DiI accumulation in the artery wall. In the same artery, LpL (10 µg/mL) was added to the perfusate solution. If accumulation is the amount of DiI remaining in/on the artery wall after lumen washout. If accumulation is greater than the control perfusion with DiI-VLDL.

Effects of HDL on Endothelial Layer Permeability
The actions of HDL on lipolysis-mediated increases in endothelial layer permeability were determined by measuring the accumulation of a water-soluble, nonlipid reference molecule (Mr 4400 dextran, labeled with TRITC). Initially, the rate of dextran accumulation was determined during perfusions of dextran in 1 perfused carotid artery from a rat. Then, VLDL was added to the perfusate and the rate of dextran accumulation again determined. Next, LpL was added to the perfusate and the rate of dextran accumulation again determined. In the other artery from the same animal, a parallel experiment was performed, but with HDL added to the VLDL perfusate. Vessels were compared before and after LpL administration, in the absence and presence of HDL.

An expanded Materials and Methods section is available online at http://www.circresaha.org.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Lipolysis Leads to Transfer of DiI From VLDL to HDL
To assess the behavior of the fluorescent labels during lipolysis of VLDL, in vitro lipolysis experiments were performed using DiI- and BODIPY-labeled VLDL. Recovery of fluorescent DiI and BODIPY from VLDL incubated in PBS with LpL and/or HDL is shown in Figure 2Down. Control incubations and incubations with only LpL led to recovery of most of the label, >80%, in the d<1.063 g/mL supranate. The recovered label in the VLDL and LDL fractions are shown added together to best illustrate the label remaining in VLDL and remnant lipoproteins, ie, the label in the d<1.063 g/mL lipoproteins. The presence of BSA or HDL alone had no effect (data not shown). However, when the DiI-VLDL was incubated with LpL and HDL, >60% of the label was reisolated in the d>1.063 g/mL infranate, ie, with HDL and the nonlipoproteins contained in the 1.21 g/mL infranate. A similar shift of label did not occur with the BODIPY. Therefore, DiI remained with the VLDL during the control incubations and during incubations with LpL. If, however, an acceptor for lipolysed surface lipid such as HDL was included in the incubation, the majority of the DiI disassociated from VLDL and associated with the d>1.063 g/mL infranatant. In contrast, the BODIPY remained with the VLDL. It is well known that VLDL surface lipid transfers to HDL during lipolysis.13 19 Therefore, it appears that the DiI is a marker for surface lipid transfer.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Lipolysis mediated transfer of DiI, but not BODIPY-FL cholesterol, to HDL. Shown are the averages of 2 experiments. VLDL was fluorescently labeled with either DiI or BODIPY cholesterol. VLDL (10 µg) was incubated for 2 hours at 37°C in PBS–1% BSA (150 µL). Experiments were performed in the presence of purified human LpL (1 µg) and with the addition of HDL (10 µg of protein). VLDL and remnant lipoproteins (density <1.063 g/mL) were isolated. Recovered fluorescence in these lipoproteins and those in the infranate with density >1.063 containing HDL and the remaining proteins were assessed. Lipolysis led to a shift of DiI away from VLDL and its remnants when HDL was present as an acceptor. Minimal BODIPY-FL was recovered in the d>1.063 infranate. This led to dissociation between the DiI and BODIPY-FL; the DiI behaved more like a surface lipid that transfers from triglyceride-rich lipoproteins to HDL during lipolysis. The second experiment showed an even greater shift of DiI into the d>1.063 fraction (90%) than the first (60%). Control and LpL-treated results were similar between the first and second experiments.

Accumulation and Localization of VLDL Surface Label During Lipolysis in Perfused Arteries
To examine the action of lipolysis on the VLDL surface components, we studied DiI-VLDL perfused into individual carotid arteries from male rats. Seven carotid arteries were taken from 4 rats (technical problems occurred with 1 carotid artery). During 3 alternating 10-minute perfusions of DiI-VLDL (0.056 mg/mL cholesterol) and the nonfluorescent buffer solution, little or no accumulation of DiI-VLDL was detected (0.15±0.014 [SEM] mV/min; 0.1 ng cholesterol/cm2 min–1). When LpL (10 µg/mL) was added to the perfusate, the rate of DiI accumulation increased after the 10-minute perfusion with DiI-VLDL. Previous experiments have shown that LpL in this concentration will extensively hydrolyze VLDL.20 This effect was maintained during the 2 subsequent 10-minute perfusions of DiI-VLDL. Comparison of all control perfusions of DiI-VLDL with all DiI-VLDL+LpL perfusions showed significantly greater DiI accumulation after LpL was added to the perfusate (0.33±0.048 mV/min; 2.3 times greater than control, P<0.05 by paired t test; Figure 1Up). No change in lumen diameter was observed during monitoring using our fluorescence optical system for the duration of the experiment. Therefore, LpL markedly increased DiI accumulation in vessels. Previous experiments from our laboratories have documented a dose-response relationship of LpL on LDL accumulation in the artery.6

To localize DiI-surface accumulation in the artery wall, we examined sections of the artery at the end of the experiment. As shown in Figure 3Down, DiI fluorescence accumulated in the intima, with the endothelium and the subendothelial layers most intensely labeled. Further, much less intense sites of homogeneous localized accumulations of DiI were observed below the endothelial layer. These lakes were not seen when VLDL protein was fluorescently labeled and treated with LpL (below). These observations indicate that remnant particles do not contribute to the lakes and suggest that the lakes are composed of surface lipid that is associated with DiI. Thus, lipolysis markedly increased DiI-surface lipid accumulation on the endothelium and in the subendothelial space and led to collections of label deeper in the wall.



View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Fluorescence localization of DiI in the artery wall. The rate of VLDL (0.056 mg/mL cholesterol) accumulation was determined 3 times to ensure normal vessel-permeability properties. Then LpL (10 µg/mL) was added to the solution containing the DiI-VLDL and continuously perfused for 1 hour. These images were obtained from an artery after 60 minutes of perfusion with LpL and DiI-VLDL. Intense intimal localization is observed. Panels A, B, and C image the same area of the artery wall and are of the same scale. A, Phase-contrast microscopy shows a coronal section of the artery wall. B, Fluorescence microscopy of the same section of artery. C, Phase-contrast image was layered over the fluorescent image so that the location of DiI could be determined. Small areas of fluorescence localization (arrows) suggest the formation of lipid lakes in these areas. Bar=20 µm.

Accumulation and Localization of VLDL Remnants in the Artery Wall
We next assessed whether TRITC-VLDL would accumulate in the artery wall before and after lipolysis. Arteries perfused with TRITC-VLDL (0.058 mg cholesterol/mL) alone had little accumulation at control (0.197±0.046 mV/min; 1.25 ng/cm2 min–1). Addition of LpL (10 µg/mL) to the perfused artery significantly increased TRITC accumulation in the artery wall (0.546±0.076 mV/min; 3.46 ng/cm2 hour–1, a 2.7-fold increase; n=4 animals). Localization of TRITC showed an intense accumulation in the endothelial layer (Figure 4Down). Because there was little accumulation of TRITC-VLDL and a 2.8-fold increase in TRITC accumulation after treatment with LpL, we assume that VLDL remnant particles account for the large increase in TRITC accumulation. In contrast, our previously published study showed accumulation of LDL primarily in the subendothelial space after treatment with LpL.6 Therefore, lipolysis increased remnant accumulation in the artery wall in the same general area that VLDL surface components accumulated after lipolysis. However, no TRITC accumulations (lakes) were detected in the subendothelial space.



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Fluorescence localization of TRITC-remnant particles and TRITC-VLDL in the artery wall. Using the same protocol as described for DiI-VLDL, TRITC-VLDL (0.058 mg cholesterol/mL) was perfused into individual arteries. These images were obtained from arteries after 60 minutes of perfusion with LpL (10 µg/mL) and TRITC-VLDL. A, B, and C correspond to A, B, and C in Figure 3Up. Intense intimal localization of the TRITC-remnant particles is observed.

Actions of HDL on Endothelial Layer Permeability
We next examined the actions of HDL on lipolysis-mediated increases in endothelial layer permeability by determining the accumulation of a water-soluble, nonlipid reference molecule (Mr 4400 dextran, labeled with TRITC). Initially, the rate of dextran accumulation was determined during perfusions of dextran (0.07 mg/mL) in 1 perfused carotid artery from a rat (n=4 animals). Then, VLDL (0.1 mg cholesterol/mL) was added to the perfusate and the rate of dextran accumulation again determined. Next, LpL (10 µg/mL) was added to the perfusate and the rate of dextran accumulation again determined. In the other artery from the same animal, a parallel experiment was performed, but with HDL (0.1 mg cholesterol/mL) added to the VLDL perfusate. A comparison in the rates of dextran accumulation before and after LpL administration revealed that vessels containing HDL had reduced dextran accumulation after LpL was added to the perfusate (Figure 5Down). Comparison of the change in rate of dextran accumulation (24% versus 3%) was significantly different (P<0.05, n=8 arteries). Therefore, addition of HDL to the perfusion prevented the increase in dextran accumulation seen with lipolysis.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Actions of HDL on lipolysis-induced increases in endothelial permeability. Changes in endothelial layer permeability were determined by measuring the rate of dextran accumulation in the artery wall in arteries treated with VLDL+LpL or VLDL+LpL+HDL. The presence of HDL in the perfusate significantly reduced endothelial layer permeability during lipolysis.

Removal of Lipolysis Products From the Artery Wall by HDL
Because our in vitro experiments showed that HDL accepted DiI-surface lipid from VLDL after lipolysis, we reasoned that HDL would remove DiI-labeled surface lipid from the artery wall as well. Parallel experiments were performed in the right and left carotid arteries from a single rat. One artery served as the control (no HDL added to perfusate), and the other artery was perfused with HDL. First, the artery was perfused for 10 minutes with DiI-VLDL (0.13 mg/mL cholesterol), and the rate of DiI accumulation was measured. Then, lipolysis was induced by adding LpL (10 µg/mL) to the perfusate containing VLDL. After 1 hour of perfusion with the DiI-VLDL and LpL, the DiI-containing vessel was perfused with either buffer or buffer+HDL (0.15 mg/mL cholesterol). The decay in fluorescence intensity was monitored during this washout period (15 minutes). The rate of DiI efflux was determined by nonlinear regression techniques, assuming a 2-compartment model of fluorescent decay.6 This efflux rate constant (d) of DiI removal from the artery wall was compared in vessels with and without HDL. In each animal, the efflux rate of DiI was greater with the vessel perfused with HDL (0.9±0.027 versus 0.24±0.016 hours–1; P<0.05, n=8 vessels; Figure 6Down). Therefore, HDL effectively removed the DiI that accumulated in the artery.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effect of HDL on DiI removal from the artery wall. Two arteries from a single animal were loaded with DiI after lipolysis of DiI-VLDL. Shown are fluorescent recordings obtained from 2 arteries demonstrating the efflux of DiI from the artery wall. One artery contained HDL in the perfusate; the other artery did not. HDL effected an increased efflux of DiI from the artery wall.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Lipolysis of VLDL leads to the production of free fatty acids, diglycerides, and monoglycerides. LpL also is an A1 phospholipase and leads to production of lysolecithin.13 Our studies indicate that in this setting of lipolysis of DiI-labeled VLDL, DiI is a marker for surface lipid transfer. This is not surprising, as DiI is more structurally similar to phospholipids than to the hydrophobic core lipids that would remain within lipoproteins during lipolysis.21 Thus, the accumulation of DiI-labeled VLDL in the artery wall may not reflect lipoprotein-receptor interactions if lipolysis is concurrently proceeding.

Our fluorescence histological studies showed that both DiI and TRITC significantly accumulated in the artery wall after treatment with LpL. We saw little or no accumulation of DiI-VLDL or TRITC-VLDL on or in the artery wall before addition of LpL. This relatively low level of accumulation before LpL is added indicates that primary VLDL-endothelial cell interactions play a relatively minor role in the large increase in DiI and TRITC accumulation. Our previous studies have shown that the great majority of VLDLs undergo lipolysis at the concentration of LpL and VLDL used in these experiments.20 Only a small percentage of the LpL binds to the cells; however, marked lipolysis occurred under these conditions. Thus, it appears that the VLDL surface component and the VLDL remnant localized to the intima.

Remnant particle localization to the intima is related, at least in part, to the large size of these particles that prevents further penetration into the artery. We expected the DiI-surface component to be either randomly distributed to the entire artery or present in a gradient with the intensity of signal correlating inversely with the distance from the lumen. Because the DiI and TRITC fluorescence were discretely localized in the intima, this suggested that the postlipolysis VLDL surface lipid and apolipoprotein B bind to specific intimal components. These high-affinity interactions may have prevented further penetration of the lipids into the artery wall. It is widely believed that lipoproteins are retained within arteries by association with negatively charged glycoconjugates, ie, vessel wall proteoglycans. If correct, then negatively charged lipids such as phospholipids, fatty acids, and lysolecithin should be repelled from these proteins. Perhaps basic regions of other matrix molecules interact with these lipids. This might prevent their further diffusion into the artery wall.

Atherosclerotic plaque contains large amounts of non–lipoprotein-associated (free) lipid3 22 ; however, the source of the free lipid is unclear. Free lipid could be derived from lipid-filled macrophages that have undergone cell death or apoptosis.23 Our study demonstrates that lipolysis products from triglyceride-rich lipoproteins can also provide free lipid that collects within the artery wall. These regions containing free lipid, we hypothesize, are the progenitors of the lipid whorls found in atherosclerotic plaques. In addition, arterial wall free lipid may initiate processes that promote atherosclerosis, such as inflammation and mitogenesis.24 For these reasons, when lipolysis occurs along the artery wall, rather than in the capillaries, it may be atherogenic.

In summary, there are a number of processes that occur during lipolysis of VLDL and chylomicrons that could be deleterious to the artery.25 Many of these effects may, in vivo, be tempered by the presence of HDL. Previous studies have shown that free fatty acids can increase transendothelial movement of albumin.26 Further, lipolysis also affects the barrier function of the endothelium,6 and our current studies demonstrate that HDL modulates endothelial permeability. This may occur because HDL scavenges lipolysis products,8 substances that may injure the endothelium and increase its permeability. The net effect may be to prevent permeability-related increases in lipoprotein transfer into the artery wall. A second major action of HDL, shown in these studies, is amelioration of the accumulation of non–lipoprotein-associated surface lipid within the artery, the so-called lakes shown in our micrographs. In our studies, HDL prevents the development of these lipid accumulations and can increase the removal rate of lipid once it is present in the vessel. This later process is a direct demonstration in an artery of "reverse lipid transport," a process previously shown to occur only in cultured cells.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Our laboratories are supported by an award from the University of California, Davis Medical Scholars Fund (to G.G.), by NIH Grants HL 55667 (to J.C.R.) and HL 56984 SCOR (to I.J.G.), and by the Richard A. and Nora Eccles Harrison Endowed Chair in Diabetes Research.

Received August 2, 1999; accepted February 16, 2000.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Schwenke DC, Carew TE. Initiation of atherosclerotic lesions in cholesterol-fed rabbits, II: selective retention of LDL vs selective increases in LDL permeability in susceptible sites of arteries. Arteriosclerosis. 1989;9:908–918.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Al-Haideri M, Goldberg IJ, Galeano NF, Gleeson A, Vogel T, Gorecki M, Sturley SL, Deckelbaum RJ. Heparan sulfate proteoglycan-mediated uptake of apolipoprotein E-triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles: a major pathway at physiological particle concentrations. Biochemistry. 1997;36:12766–12772.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Lupu F, Danaricu I, Simionescu N. Development of intracellular lipid deposits in the lipid-laden cells of atherosclerotic lesions: a cytochemical and ultrastructural study. Atherosclerosis. 1987;67:127–142.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Nordestgaard BG, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Lewis B. Influx in vivo of low density, intermediate density, and very low density lipoproteins into aortic intimas of genetically hyperlipidemic rabbits: roles of plasma concentrations, extent of aortic lesion, and lipoprotein particle size as determinants. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992;12:6–18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Chung BH, Tallis G, Yalamoori V, Anatharamaiah GM, Segrest JP. Liposome-like particles isolated from human atherosclerotic plaques are structurally and compositionally similar to surface remnants of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1994;14:622–635.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Rutledge JC, Woo MM, Rezai AA, Curtiss LK, Goldberg IJ. Lipoprotein lipase increases lipoprotein binding to the artery wall and increases endothelial layer permeability by formation of lipolysis products. Circ Res. 1997;80:819–828.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Nordestgaard BG, Wootton R, Lewis B. Selective retention of VLDL, IDL, and LDL in the arterial intima of genetically hyperlipidemic rabbits in vivo: molecular size as a determinant of fractional loss from the intima-inner media. Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:534–542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Tall AR. An overview of reverse cholesterol transport. Eur Heart J. 1998;19 (suppl A):A31–A35.

9. Phillips MC, Gillotte KL, Haynes MP, Johnson WJ, Lund-Katz S, Rothblat GH. Mechanisms of high density lipoprotein-mediated efflux of cholesterol from cell plasma membranes. Atherosclerosis. 1998;137 (suppl):S13–S17.

10. Watson AD, Berliner JA, Hama SY, La Du BN, Faull KF, Fogelman AM, Navab M. Protective effect of high density lipoprotein associated paraoxonase: inhibition of the biological activity of minimally oxidized low density lipoprotein. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:2882–2891.

11. Saxena U, Ferguson E, Bisgaier CL. Apolipoprotein E modulates low density lipoprotein retention by lipoprotein lipase anchored to the subendothelial matrix. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:14812–14819.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Ebenbichler CF, Kirchmair R, Egger C, Patsch JR. Postprandial state and atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1995;6:286–290.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Goldberg IJ. Lipoprotein lipase and lipolysis: central roles in lipoprotein metabolism and atherogenesis. J Lipid Res. 1996;37:693–707.[Abstract]

14. Yla-Herttuala S, Lipton BA, Rosenfeld ME, Goldberg IJ, Steinberg D, Witztum JL. Macrophages and smooth muscle cells express lipoprotein lipase in human and rabbit atherosclerotic lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:10143–10147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. O’Brien K, Gordon D, Deeb S, Ferguson M, Chait A. Localization of lipoprotein lipase mRNA to foam cell-rich regions of human atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin Invest. 1992;89:1544–1550.

16. Reaven E, Tsai L, Azhar S. Intracellular events in the "selective" transport of lipoprotein-derived cholesteryl esters. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:16208–16217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Roberts KA, Rezai AA, Pinkerton KE, Rutledge JC. Effect of environmental tobacco smoke on LDL accumulation in the artery wall. Circulation. 1996;94:2248–2253.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Roberts KA, Woo MM, Rutledge JC. Nitric oxide mediates LDL uptake in the artery wall in response to high concentrations of 17 beta-estradiol. Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:2123–2131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Havel RJ, Kane JP, Kashyap ML. Interchange of apolipoproteins between chylomicrons and high density lipoproteins during alimentary lipemia in man. J Clin Invest. 1973;52:32–38.

20. Saxena U, Witte LD, Goldberg IJ. Release of endothelial cell lipoprotein lipase by plasma lipoproteins and free fatty acids. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:4349–4355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Pitas RE, Innerarity TL, Weinstein JN, Mahley RW. Acetoacetylated lipoproteins used to distinguish fibroblasts from macrophages in vitro by fluorescence microscopy. Arteriosclerosis. 1981;1:177–185.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Chung GH, Tallis G, Yalamoori V, Anantharamaiah GM, Segrest JP. Liposome-like particles isolated from human atherosclerotic plaques are structurally and compositionally similar to surface remnants of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:622–635.

23. Guyton JR, Klemp KF. The lipid-rich core region of human atherosclerotic fibrous plaques: prevalence of small lipid droplets and vesicles by electron microscopy. Am J Pathol. 1989;134:705–717.[Abstract]

24. Berliner JA, Navab M, Fogelman AM, Frank JS, Demer LL, Edwards PA, Watson AD, Lusis AJ. Atherosclerosis: basic mechanisms: oxidation, inflammation, and genetics. Circulation. 1995;91:2488–2496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Karpe F. Mechanisms of postprandial hyperlipidaemia: remnants and coronary artery disease. Diabetic Med. 1997;14 (Suppl 3):S60–S66.

26. Hennig B, Shasby DM, Fulton AB, Spector AA. Exposure to free fatty acid increases the transfer of albumin across cultured endothelial monolayers. Arteriosclerosis. 1984;4:489–497.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
L. Wang, R. Gill, T. L. Pedersen, L. J. Higgins, J. W. Newman, and J. C. Rutledge
Triglyceride-rich lipoprotein lipolysis releases neutral and oxidized FFAs that induce endothelial cell inflammation
J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2009; 50(2): 204 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. J. Freiberg, A. Tybjaerg-Hansen, J. S. Jensen, and B. G. Nordestgaard
Nonfasting Triglycerides and Risk of Ischemic Stroke in the General Population
JAMA, November 12, 2008; 300(18): 2142 - 2152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
L. Wang, A. R. Sapuri-Butti, H. H. Aung, A. N. Parikh, and J. C. Rutledge
Triglyceride-rich lipoprotein lipolysis increases aggregation of endothelial cell membrane microdomains and produces reactive oxygen species
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2008; 295(1): H237 - H244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
B. G. Nordestgaard, M. Benn, P. Schnohr, and A. Tybjaerg-Hansen
Nonfasting Triglycerides and Risk of Myocardial Infarction, Ischemic Heart Disease, and Death in Men and Women
JAMA, July 18, 2007; 298(3): 299 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
L. Eiselein, D. W. Wilson, M. W. Lame, and J. C. Rutledge
Lipolysis products from triglyceride-rich lipoproteins increase endothelial permeability, perturb zonula occludens-1 and F-actin, and induce apoptosis
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): H2745 - H2753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. Wehinger, I. Tancevski, W. Schgoer, P. Eller, K. Hochegger, M. Morak, A. Hermetter, A. Ritsch, J. R. Patsch, and B. Foeger
Phospholipid Transfer Protein Augments Apoptosis in THP-1-Derived Macrophages Induced by Lipolyzed Hypertriglyceridemic Plasma
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, April 1, 2007; 27(4): 908 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
B. Loeffler, J. Heeren, M. Blaeser, H. Radner, D. Kayser, B. Aydin, and M. Merkel
Lipoprotein lipase-facilitated uptake of LDL is mediated by the LDL receptor
J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 288 - 298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
D. Masson, J.-P. Pais de Barros, Z. Zak, T. Gautier, N. Le Guern, M. Assem, J. W. Chisholm, J. R. Paterniti Jr., and L. Lagrost
Human apoA-I expression in CETP transgenic rats leads to lower levels of apoC-I in HDL and to magnification of CETP-mediated lipoprotein changes
J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2006; 47(2): 356 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M. Rodriguez-Porcel, A. Lerman, J. Herrmann, R. S. Schwartz, T. Sawamura, M. Condorelli, C. Napoli, and L. O. Lerman
Hypertension exacerbates the effect of hypercholesterolemia on the myocardial microvasculature
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2003; 58(1): 213 - 221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
A. E. Mullick, R. J. Deckelbaum, I. J. Goldberg, M. Al-Haideri, and J. C. Rutledge
Apolipoprotein E and Lipoprotein Lipase Increase Triglyceride-Rich Particle Binding but Decrease Particle Penetration in Arterial Wall
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, December 1, 2002; 22(12): 2080 - 2085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
G. Chiesa, E. Monteggia, M. Marchesi, P. Lorenzon, M. Laucello, V. Lorusso, C. Di Mario, E. Karvouni, R. S. Newton, C. L. Bisgaier, et al.
Recombinant Apolipoprotein A-IMilano Infusion Into Rabbit Carotid Artery Rapidly Removes Lipid From Fatty Streaks
Circ. Res., May 17, 2002; 90(9): 974 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
M. O. Pentikainen, R. Oksjoki, K. Oorni, and P. T. Kovanen
Lipoprotein Lipase in the Arterial Wall: Linking LDL to the Arterial Extracellular Matrix and Much More
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, February 1, 2002; 22(2): 211 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. C Rutledge
Links between food and vascular disease
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2002; 75(1): 4 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. B. Mathiesen, K. H. Bonaa, and O. Joakimsen
Low Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Are Associated With Echolucent Carotid Artery Plaques: The Tromso Study
Stroke, September 1, 2001; 32(9): 1960 - 1965.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
H. L. Dichek, S. M. Johnson, H. Akeefe, G. T. Lo, E. Sage, C. E. Yap, and R. W. Mahley
Hepatic lipase overexpression lowers remnant and LDL levels by a noncatalytic mechanism in LDL receptor-deficient mice
J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2001; 42(2): 201 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
M. B. Stemerman
Lipoprotein Effects on the Vessel Wall
Circ. Res., April 14, 2000; 86(7): 715 - 716.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Methods
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rutledge, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, I. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rutledge, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, I. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipids
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors