Integrative Physiology |
From the Department of Physiology (A.N., D.S.A.M., K.A.T., L.G.N.), Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, La, and the Research Equipment Center (A.M.), Kagawa Medical University, Kagawa, Japan.
Correspondence to Akira Nishiyama, MD, PhD, Department of Physiology, SL-39, Tulane University School of Medicine, 1430 Tulane Ave., New Orleans, LA 70112. E-mail anishiy{at}mailhost.tcs.tulane.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: ATP renal autoregulation tubuloglomerular feedback renal interstitium adenosine
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies using the isolated blood-perfused juxtamedullary nephron preparation demonstrated that ATP, superfused over the renal microvessels, exerts selective afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction without affecting efferent arteriolar tone,19 20 which is an important criterion for the agent mediating autoregulatory behavior.14 15 This occurrence is due to the selective localization of P2 purinoceptors, which have been clearly identified on afferent but not on efferent arteriolar vascular smooth muscle cells.21 Further studies showed that P2 purinoceptor desensitization, receptor saturation, or blockade markedly attenuated autoregulatory adjustments in afferent arteriolar diameter after acute elevations in renal perfusion pressure.16 Recent studies performed in anesthetized dogs demonstrated that the ability of the renal vasculature to exhibit autoregulation-mediated changes in renal vascular resistance (RVR) in response to alterations in renal arterial pressure (RAP) was markedly attenuated during P2 purinoceptor saturation by intra-arterial infusions with high doses of ATP.18
It has been reported that whereas the macula densa cells have abundant mitochondria, they have reduced levels of Na+,K+-ATPase,22 making the macula densa cells good candidates for a source of extracellular ATP. Furthermore, micropuncture and microperfusion experiments in rats have demonstrated that stop-flow pressure-feedback responses to increases in late proximal perfusion rate were markedly blunted during peritubular capillary infusion with saturating doses of ATP, suggesting that ATP modulates the macula densadependent tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) mechanism,17 which contributes to renal autoregulation.14 15 On the basis of the accumulated evidence, we have hypothesized that in response to increases in RAP, ATP is secreted from the macula densa or adjoining cells into the interstitial fluid bathing the vascular pole and causes autoregulatory adjustments in the preglomerular arterial resistance.14 15 One prediction of this hypothesis is that changes in interstitial ATP concentration during changes in RAP should exhibit a relation with the autoregulation-related changes in RVR. The present experiments used an in vivo renal microdialysis method to measure renal interstitial concentrations of ATP and the changes occurring in response to changes in RAP. Experiments were also conducted to investigate the changes in renal interstitial ATP levels under conditions of enhanced activity of the TGF mechanism elicited with acetazolamide23 24 as well as during inhibition of the TGF response by furosemide.25 26 Because adenosine has also been suggested as a potential mediator of the TGF mechanism27 and ATP can be metabolized to adenosine,5 15 28 we also evaluated the changes in renal interstitial concentrations of adenosine in response to changes in RAP.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Renal Microdialysis Technique
For the determination of renal interstitial
concentrations of ATP and adenosine, we used a microdialysis
probe (Toyobo Co Ltd) as previously reported.30 31 The
microdialysis probes were implanted into the renal cortex and were
perfused with Ringers solution (pH 7.4) at a rate of 3 µL/min. The
dialysates were directly collected from outflow steel tubing, and
samples were stored at -70°C before analysis. At the end of
each experiment, the kidney was removed, and the location of the
microdialysis membrane was confirmed by surgical exposure of the
probe.
Characteristics of the Microdialysis Probe In Vivo
An in vitro gradient dialysis technique and mathematical model
were used32 33 34 to estimate the in vivo efficiency of the
microdialysis probe in 7 dogs. Two or 3 probes were implanted into the
renal cortex and were perfused with 3 or 4 different concentrations of
ATP (0 to 20 nmol/L) or adenosine (0 to 600 nmol/L) at a
perfusion rate of 3 µL/min. The dialysate fluid was collected during
perfusion at each concentration (25 minutes each), and the ATP or
adenosine concentrations in the dialysate and perfusate
were determined.
Renal Interstitial ATP and Adenosine During
Stepwise Reduction in RAP
At least 90 minutes before the start of the experimental
protocol, the left common carotid artery was partially constricted to
elevate the basal level of RAP to
130 to 140 mm Hg. This
allowed examination of the pressure-flow relation over a wider range of
arterial pressure.18 29 The experimental
protocol was started with urine collections for 2 consecutive 10-minute
periods at spontaneous RAP. With use of an adjustable renal
arterial clamp, RAP was reduced within the renal
autoregulatory range to
100 mm Hg (step 1) and 80 mm Hg
(step 2). The pressure at each step was held for 25 minutes, and renal
interstitial fluid samples were collected for measurements
of ATP concentrations. In 6 of these dogs, separate samples from the
microdialysis probes were also collected to be used for measurements of
adenosine concentration. Five minutes was allowed for
stabilization at each level of RAP before 2 consecutive 10-minute urine
samples were collected. In the other 6 of these dogs, 2 additional
consecutive 10-minute collections were performed at 30 minutes after
releasing the renal arterial clamp (recovery period).
Effects of Acetazolamide and Furosemide on Renal
Interstitial ATP
In this experimental series, 5-minute samples from 2
microdialysis probes were collected throughout each period. After the
control dialysate sample was collected, acetazolamide
(Sigma Chemical Co) was infused intra-arterially at a rate
of 100 µg · kg-1 ·
min-1 for 40 minutes. After 5 minutes of
acetazolamide infusion, 3 consecutive 5-minute dialysate
samples were collected. A continuous infusion of furosemide at a rate
of 10 µg · kg-1 ·
min-1 (Sigma) was then added to the
acetazolamide infusion. After 5 minutes of furosemide
infusion, 3 additional consecutive 5-minute sample collections were
also performed.
Analytical Procedures
ATP concentrations were determined by using the
luciferin-luciferase assay based on the Sigma ATP Bioluminescent Assay
Kit. Adenosine in the dialysate was measured by using
HPLC-fluorometric analysis as previously
reported.31 Inulin, sodium, and potassium concentrations
in urine and plasma were measured as previously
reported.18 29
Statistical Analysis
The values are presented as mean±SE. Statistical
comparisons of the differences in the responses were performed by
ANOVA, followed by the Newman-Keuls test. Correlation of the responses
were made by the Spearman test. A value of P<0.05 was
considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Changes in Renal Interstitial Concentrations of ATP and
Adenosine During Changes in RAP Within the Autoregulatory
Range
The Table
summarizes the changes in renal
hemodynamics and function during stepwise reductions in
RAP (n=12). RBF and GFR did not change significantly within this
pressure range, demonstrating high autoregulatory efficiency. Urine
flow, urinary excretion of sodium, fractional excretion of sodium, and
urinary excretion of potassium were significantly decreased during
reductions in RAP, which are consistent with the
well-established phenomenon of pressure natriuresis.29
|
The basal average dialysate ATP concentration, which was measured at 90
minutes after the implantation of the microdialysis probes, was
2.81±0.37 nmol/L. Reduction in RAP significantly decreased ATP
concentrations to 1.95±0.25 nmol/L in step 1 (P<0.01) and
1.20±0.22 nmol/L in step 2 (P<0.01) (Figure 2
). When a probe equilibrium rate of
43.2% was taken into account, renal interstitial
concentrations of ATP were estimated to be 6.51±0.71 nmol/L in control
conditions and to be decreased to 4.51±0.55 nmol/L in step 1 and
2.77±0.47 nmol/L in step 2 (n=12). Control RVR averaged 33.1±2.6
mm Hg · mL-1 · min · g.
RVR decreased significantly by 22±2% in step 1 (P<0.01)
and 38±3% in step 2 (P<0.01) (Figure 2
). When
individual responses were considered, each experiment showed the same
pattern between RAP and the dialysate ATP concentration and also
between the ATP concentration and RVR. Figure 3
illustrates the relations between the
percent changes in RAP and ATP (Figure 3A
) and between ATP and
RVR (Figure 3B
) (n=12). The percent changes in ATP
concentrations were highly correlated with the percent changes in RAP
(r=0.80, P=0.0005) and in RVR (r=0.88,
P=0.0001). After allowing RAP to return to ambient
conditions, ATP concentrations returned to their respective control
levels, with an average of 2.44±0.51 nmol/L (n=6), which was not
significantly different from the average control value from these 6
experiments.
|
|
The control average dialysate adenosine concentration was 47±2
nmol/L (n=6, Figure 2
). When a probe equilibrium rate of 40.3%
(see above) was taken into account, renal interstitial
concentrations of adenosine were estimated to be 117±6 nmol/L
in control conditions. However, interstitial
adenosine concentrations were not altered in response to
changes in RAP within this autoregulatory pressure range. In addition,
the percent changes in adenosine concentrations did not exhibit
any correlation with RAP (r=0.07, P>0.999) or
RVR (r=0.10, P=0.72) (Figure 4
).
|
Time-control experiments were performed to determine the stability of the renal interstitial concentrations of ATP and adenosine (n=3). Dialysate sampling (30-minute duration) was started 90 minutes after the implantation of the microdialysis probes and was continued for 180 minutes. GFR, urinary excretion of sodium and potassium, and fractional excretion of sodium were also measured. At 180 minutes after the initiation of sampling, ATP and adenosine concentrations in the dialysate were 3.25±0.81 and 53±9 nmol/L, which were not significantly different from basal ATP and adenosine concentrations (3.12±0.84 and 49±11 nmol/L, respectively). During this period, RAP was not significantly changed (from 124±7 mm Hg in control to 123±6 mm Hg at 180 minutes). GFR, urinary excretion of sodium and potassium, and fractional excretion of sodium also did not change during this period (data not shown).
Effects of Acetazolamide and Furosemide on Renal
Interstitial ATP
Acetazolamide infusion (100 µg ·
kg-1 · min-1) for
20 minutes did not cause any significant change in RAP (from
121±4 mm Hg in control and 122±4 mm Hg at 20 minutes). As
expected, the sodium excretion rate increased from 1.14±0.06 to
6.39±0.71 µmol · L-1 ·
min-1 · g-1
(P<0.01, n=5). RBF and GFR were significantly decreased
from 3.63±0.15 and 0.89±0.06 mL ·
min-1 · g-1 to
3.12±0.21 and 0.77±0.03 mL · min-1
· g-1, respectively (P<0.01).
Accordingly, RVR was significantly increased from 33.5±2.0 to
38.3±2.7 mm Hg · mL-1 ·
min · g (P<0.01). Figure 5
illustrates the changes in ATP
concentrations in dialysate. Acetazolamide significantly
increased dialysate ATP levels from 3.16±0.42 nmol/L to a peak
concentration of 8.00±1.78 nmol/L during the first sampling period
(P<0.05). ATP concentrations waned slightly during the next
sampling periods, as shown in Figure 5
. After addition of
furosemide (10 µg · kg-1 ·
min-1) to the intrarenal arterial
infusion line, RBF and GFR were significantly increased to 3.52±0.32
and 1.17±0.12 mL · min-1 ·
g-1, respectively (P<0.05).
Dialysate ATP concentrations were significantly decreased to 2.46±0.46
nmol/L during the first sampling period and slightly lower during the
subsequent periods (P<0.05, Figure 5
).
Interstitial ATP concentrations during furosemide were
significantly lower than those measured during the control period
(P<0.05, Figure 5
). In the other 3 dogs,
acetazolamide (100 µg ·
kg-1 · min-1) was
infused alone for 40 minutes to examine the possibility of any
time-dependent changes in renal interstitial ATP levels.
Acetazolamide significantly increased dialysate ATP levels
from 2.87±0.52 to 6.21±1.89 nmol/L (5- to 10-minute sampling period,
P<0.05), and these concentrations remained elevated for the
duration of sampling up to 40 minutes (6.04±1.73 nmol/L).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At present, 2 mechanisms are considered to be responsible for renal autoregulation: the TGF mechanism and the myogenic mechanism.14 15 Both mechanisms involve signals that impinge on afferent arteriolar resistance.14 15 The nature of the signaling mechanisms that mediate the afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction in response to increases in arterial pressure has remained an unresolved issue; however, the possible participation of extracellular ATP in this mechanism has received increased attention recently.14 15 16 17 18 Chan et al21 performed immunohistochemistry studies and found that the preglomerular renal vasculature expresses abundant P2X receptors, whereas efferent arterioles appear to be devoid of such receptors. It has also been demonstrated that P2 purinoceptors located in afferent arteriolar vascular smooth muscle cells act as Ca2+-permeable ion channels and thus contribute to activation of Ca2+ influx.37 Studies using the blood-perfused juxtamedullary nephron preparation have shown that selective afferent arteriolar responses to ATP occur with a response time that is compatible with normal autoregulatory responses.14 15 19 20 In addition, normal autoregulatory responses are significantly attenuated by P2 purinoceptor saturation16 18 or receptor desensitization16 and are impaired by blockade of P2X purinoceptors.16 These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that ATP mediates autoregulatory adjustments in RVR. The present results provide further support for this hypothesis by demonstrating that ATP concentrations in the interstitial fluid are closely associated with the autoregulatory adjustments in RVR that occur in response to changes in RAP.
Although the exact mechanism by which extracellular ATP regulates RVR remains to be identified, it is possible that signals originating as a consequence of alterations in RAP initiate a sequence of events that alters the rate of ATP production by the cells surrounding the vascular pole of the glomerulus.14 15 It has been reported that renal epithelial cells7 as well as vascular smooth muscle6 8 and endothelial cells6 release ATP into the surrounding pericellular fluid and that flow-induced shear stress on vessel walls stimulates ATP release from endothelial cells.38 39 Furthermore, macula densa cells are also proposed as a potential source of ATP during changes in RAP.14 15 The present experiments demonstrate that ATP is released into the interstitial fluid in response to increases in the activity of the TGF mechanism caused by either increases in RAP or treatment with acetazolamide.23 24 Furthermore, the ATP levels were decreased after infusion of furosemide, which is known to block the TGF response.25 26 Thus, the results of the present experiments support the hypothesis based on the results of previous studies14 15 17 22 indicating that ATP released from the macula densa cells, at least in part, caused the changes in interstitial concentrations of ATP during changes in RAP.
It should be recognized that the concentrations noted in the renal interstitial fluid in the present study may not reflect the actual effective concentrations of ATP at the vascular smooth muscle cells. Because extracellular ATP is rapidly hydrolyzed by membrane-bound ectoenzymes,5 14 15 40 the interstitial ATP concentrations would be expected to be lower than the actual concentration in the vascular site. It should also be noted that the dialysis membrane is located in the mid cortex and superficial cortex. Therefore, ATP levels in the collected dialysate sample reflect the mid and superficial cortical ATP concentrations. It is possible that there are differential responses of renal regional interstitial ATP to RAP. Further experiments are needed to assess the regional differences of ATP levels between superficial cortex, mid cortex, and medulla.
Studies using the isolated perfused guinea pig heart showed that flow-induced shear stress released ATP in the perfusate, which then caused coronary vasodilation, possibly via P2Y purinoceptors.3 In renal vessels, P2Y purinoceptors are located on endothelial cells and mediate large arcuate artery vasodilation through nitric oxide and prostacyclin release from vascular endothelium.5 11 14 15 Several studies have concluded that P2Y purinoceptors on endothelial cells are activated from the luminal side of the vasculature to cause vasodilation, whereas P2X-mediated constriction occurs predominantly from direct exposure of ATP from the adventitial side.5 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Because ATP released from adjoining epithelial cells would approach the vascular smooth cells from the interstitium, their consequences would be consistent with renal vasoconstriction.5 14 15
Adenosine has also been postulated as a candidate for mediating
renal autoregulation and the TGF mechanism27 ; however;
this hypothesis remains controversial because of the conflicting
reports of the ability of various adenosine receptor agonists
and antagonists to influence renal autoregulatory
responses.14 15 27 41 The present estimated
concentration of renal interstitial adenosine in
the dog cortex is
100 nmol/L, which is similar to that observed in
previous renal microdialysis studies of the rat32 33 and
rabbit31 cortex. In the present experiments, it has
been shown that interstitial adenosine levels are
not altered in response to decreases in RAP within the autoregulatory
range, whereas ATP concentrations are significantly decreased. It has
also been shown that the renal microvasculature is essentially
unresponsive to 10-8 mol/L of
ADP20 and AMP.19 Although ATP can be
metabolized to ADP, AMP, and
adenosine,5 14 15 28 40 complete and immediate
hydrolysis of ATP would still not yield sufficiently high levels of
these substances to cause comparable vasoconstriction.
Although it is possible that the changes in renal interstitial ATP concentrations were simply the result of metabolic activity of nephrons, this seems unlikely because the changes in ATP concentrations did not exhibit a significant correlation with changes in sodium excretion rate (r=0.35, P=0.236). In addition, we have found that furosemide, which inhibits sodium transport and markedly increases urinary sodium excretion, actually decreases ATP levels in the interstitium. These results indicate that renal interstitial concentrations of ATP may not reflect the metabolic activity of nephrons.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated a positive correlation between the autoregulatory and TGF-mediated adjustments in RVR and renal interstitial ATP concentrations and supports the hypothesis that autoregulation-dependent changes in RVR are mediated by corresponding changes in interstitial ATP concentrations.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received July 15, 1999; accepted December 23, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Olsson RA, Pearson JD. Cardiovascular
purinoceptors. Physiol Rev. 1990;70:761845.
3. Vials AJ, Burnstock G. ATP release from the isolated perfused guinea pig heart in response to increase flow. Vasc Res. 1996;33:14.
4.
Cox BF, Smits GJ. Regional hemodynamic
effects of purinergic P2 receptor subtype agonists in rats.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996;277:14921500.
5. Chan CM, Unwin RJ, Burnstock G. Potential functional roles of extracellular ATP in kidney and urinary tract. Exp Nephrol. 1998;6:200207.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Pearson JD, Gordon JL. Vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells in culture selectivity release adenine nucleotides. Nature. 1979;281:384386.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Taylor AL, Kudlow BA, Marrs KL, Gruenert DC, Guggino
WB, Schwiebert EM. Bioluminescence detection of ATP release mechanism
in epithelia. Am J Physiol. 1998;275:C1391C1406.
8. Katsuragi T, Tamesue S, Sato C, Sato Y, Furukawa T. ATP release by angiotensin II from segments and cultured smooth muscle cells of guinea-pig taenia coli. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1996;354:796799.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Forrester T, Williams CA. Release of adenosine
triphosphate from isolated adult heart cells in response to
hypoxia. J Physiol (Lond). 1977;268:371390.
10. Evans RJ, Darkach V, Suprenant A. ATP mediates fast synaptic transmission in mammalian neurons. Nature. 1992;357:503505.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Churchill PC, Ellis VR. Pharmacological
characterization of the renovascular P2 purinergic receptors.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993;265:334338.
12.
Bohmann C, Rump LC, Schaible U, Kugelgen IV.
-Adrenoceptor modulation of norepinephrine and ATP
release in isolated kidneys of spontaneously hypertensive rats.
Hypertension. 1995;25:12241231.
13. Pfeilschifter J. Extracellular ATP stimulates polyphosphoinositide hydrolysis and prostaglandin synthesis in rat renal mesangial cells: involvement of a pertussis toxin-sensitive guanine nucleotide binding protein and feedback inhibition by protein kinase C. Cell Signal. 1990;2:129138.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Navar LG, Inscho EW, Majid DSA, Imig JD,
Harrison-Bernard LM, Mitchell KD. Paracrine regulation of the renal
microcirculation. Physiol Rev. 1996;76:425536.
15. Inscho EW, Mitchell KD, Navar LG. Extracellular ATP in the regulation of renal microvascular function. FASEB J. 1994;8:319328.[Abstract]
16.
Inscho EW, Cook AK, Navar LG. Pressure-mediated
vasoconstriction of juxamedullary afferent arterioles involves
P2-purinoceptor activation. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:F1077F1085.
17.
Mitchell KD, Navar LG. Modulation of
tubuloglomerular feedback responsiveness by
extracellular ATP. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:F458F466.
18.
Majid DSA, Inscho EW, Navar LG. P2 purinoceptor
saturation by adenosine triphosphate impairs renal
autoregulation in dogs. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:492498.
19.
Inscho EW, Cook AK, Mui VY, Miller J. Direct assessment
of renal microvascular response to P2-purinoceptor agonists.
Am J Physiol. 1998;274:F718F727.
20.
Inscho EW, Carmines AK, Navar LG. Juxtamedullary
afferent arteriolar responses to P1 and P2 purinergic stimulation.
Hypertension. 1991;17:10331037.
21.
Chan CM, Unwin RJ, Bardini M, Oglesby IB, Ford APDW,
Townsend-Nicholson A, Burnstock G. Localization of P2X1 purinoceptors
by autoradiography and immunohistochemistry in rat
kidneys. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:F799F804.
22. Schnermann J, Marver D. ATPase activity in macula densa cells of the rabbit kidney. Pflugers Arch. 1986;407:8286.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Ichihara A, Inscho EW, Imig JD, Navar LG. Neuronal
nitric oxide synthase modulates rat renal microvascular. Am
J Physiol. 1998;274:F516F524.
24. Persson AEG, Wright FS. Evidence for feedback mediated reduction of glomerular filtration rate during infusion of acetazolamide. Acta Physiol Scand. 1982;114:17.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Takenaka T, Harrison-Bernard LM, Inscho EW, Carmines
PK, Navar LG. Autoregulation of afferent arteriolar blood flow in
juxtamedullary nephrons. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:F879F887.
26. Schnermann J, Briggs J. Concentration-dependent sodium chloride transport as the signal in feedback control of glomerular filtration rate. Kidney Int. 1982;22(suppl 12):S82S89.
27.
Schnermann J. Effect of adenosine analogues on
tubuloglomerular feedback responses. Am
J Physiol. 1988;255:F33F42.
28. Moody CJ, Meghji P, Burnstock G. Stimulation of P1-purinoceptors by ATP depends partly on its conversion to AMP and adenosine and partly on direct action. Eur J Pharmacol. 1994;97:4754.
29.
Majid DSA, Omoro SA, Chin SY, Navar LG. Intrarenal
nitric oxide activity and pressure natriuresis in anesthetized
dogs. Hypertension. 1998;32:266272.
30. Nishiyama A, Miyatake A, Kusudo K, Syokoji T, Yue W, Fukui T, Aki Y, Kimura S, Abe Y. Effects of halothane on renal hemodynamics and interstitial nitric oxide in rabbits. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999;367:299306.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Nishiyama A, Miyatake A, Aki Y, Fukui T, Rahman M,
Kimura S, Abe Y. Adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist
KW-3902 prevents hypoxia-induced renal vasoconstriction.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;291:988993.
32.
Siragy HM, Linden J. Sodium intake markedly alters
renal interstitial fluid adenosine.
Hypertension. 1996;27:404407.
33.
Baranowski RL, Westenfelder C. Estimation of renal
interstitial adenosine and purine metabolites by
microdialysis. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:F174F182.
34. Menacherry S, Hubert W, Justice JB Jr. In vivo calibration of microdialysis probes for exogenous compounds. Anal Chem. 1992;64:577583.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Lutz PL, Kabler S. Release of adenosine and ATP in the brain of the freshwater turtle (Trachemys scripta) during long-term anoxia. Brain Res. 1997;769:281286.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Kuzmin AI, Lakomkin VL, Kapelko VI, Vassort G.
Interstitial ATP level and degradation in control and
postmyocardial infarcted rats. Am J Physiol. 1998;275:C766C771.
37.
Inscho EW, Schroeder AC, Deichmann PC, Imig JD.
ATP-mediated Ca2+ signaling in
preglomerular smooth muscle cells. Am J
Physiol. 1999;276:F450F456.
38. Ralevic V, Milner P, Kirkpatrick KA, Burnstock G. Flow-induced release of adenosine 5'-triphosphate from endothelial cells of the rat mesenteric arterial bed. Experientia. 1991;48:3134.
39. Milner P, Bodin P, Loesch A, Burnstock G. Rapid release of endothelin and ATP from isolated aortic endothelial cells exposed to increased flow. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990;170:649656.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Gordon EL, Pearson JD, Dickinson ES, Moreau D, Slakey
LL. The hydrolysis of extracellular adenine nucleotides by
arterial smooth muscle cells: regulation of
adenosine production at the cell surface. J
Biol Chem. 1989;264:1898618992.
41. Ibarrola, AM, Inscho EW, Vari RC, Navar LG. Influence of adenosine receptor blockade on renal function and renal autoregulation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1991;2:991999.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. W. Inscho Purinoceptor regulation of renal tubular transport is coming of age Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2009; 297(5): F1166 - F1167. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yao, T. Oite, and M. Kitamura Gap junctional intercellular communication in the juxtaglomerular apparatus Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): F939 - F946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. W. Inscho Mysteries of Renal Autoregulation Hypertension, February 1, 2009; 53(2): 299 - 306. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vallon P2 receptors in the regulation of renal transport mechanisms Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): F10 - F27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Graciano, A. Nishiyama, K. Jackson, D. M. Seth, R. M. Ortiz, M. C. Prieto-Carrasquero, H. Kobori, and L. G. Navar Purinergic receptors contribute to early mesangial cell transformation and renal vessel hypertrophy during angiotensin II-induced hypertension Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): F161 - F169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Usa, R. J. Singh, B. C. Netzel, Y. Liu, H. Raff, and M. Liang Renal interstitial corticosterone and 11-dehydrocorticosterone in conscious rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): F186 - F192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Guan, D. A. Osmond, and E. W. Inscho Purinoceptors in the Kidney Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2007; 232(6): 715 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Rivera, S. Zhang, B. S. Fuller, B. Edwards, T. Seki, M.-H. Wang, M. B. Marrero, and E. W. Inscho P2 receptor regulation of [Ca2+]i in cultured mouse mesangial cells Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): F1380 - F1389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Vallon, B. Muhlbauer, and H. Osswald Adenosine and kidney function. Physiol Rev, July 1, 2006; 86(3): 901 - 940. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Sokolova, A. Skorinkin, I. Moiseev, A. Agrachev, A. Nistri, and R. Giniatullin Experimental and Modeling Studies of Desensitization of P2X3 Receptors Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2006; 70(1): 373 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Takenaka, H. Okada, Y. Kanno, T. Inoue, M. Ryuzaki, H. Nakamoto, H. Kawachi, F. Shimizu, and H. Suzuki Exogenous 5'-nucleotidase improves glomerular autoregulation in Thy-1 nephritic rats Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2006; 290(4): F844 - F853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhou and C. K. Kost Jr. Adenosine A1 Receptor Antagonist Blunts Urinary Potassium Excretion, but Not Renal Hemodynamic Effects, Induced by Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitor in Rats J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2006; 316(2): 530 - 538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nishiyama, K. E. Jackson, D. S. A. Majid, M. Rahman, and L. G. Navar Renal interstitial fluid ATP responses to arterial pressure and tubuloglomerular feedback activation during calcium channel blockade Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): H772 - H777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Schweda, F. Segerer, H. Castrop, J. Schnermann, and A. Kurtz Blood Pressure-Dependent Inhibition of Renin Secretion Requires A1 Adenosine Receptors Hypertension, October 1, 2005; 46(4): 780 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Komlosi, A. Fintha, and P. D. Bell Renal Cell-to-Cell Communication via Extracellular ATP Physiology, April 1, 2005; 20(2): 86 - 90. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zhang, C. V. Remillard, I. Fantozzi, and J. X.-J. Yuan ATP-induced mitogenesis is mediated by cyclic AMP response element-binding protein-enhanced TRPC4 expression and activity in human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): C1192 - C1201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Komlosi, J. Peti-Peterdi, A. L. Fuson, A. Fintha, L. Rosivall, and P. D. Bell Macula densa basolateral ATP release is regulated by luminal [NaCl] and dietary salt intake Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): F1054 - F1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Just and W. J. Arendshorst Dynamics and contribution of mechanisms mediating renal blood flow autoregulation Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, September 1, 2003; 285(3): R619 - R631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yao, M. Suwa, B. Li, K. Kawamura, T. Morioka, and T. Oite ATP-Dependent Mechanism for Coordination of Intercellular Ca2+ Signaling and Renin Secretion in Rat Juxtaglomerular Cells Circ. Res., August 22, 2003; 93(4): 338 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. W. Inscho Modulation of renal microvascular function by adenosine Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2003; 285(1): R23 - R25. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Bell, J.-Y. Lapointe, R. Sabirov, S. Hayashi, J. Peti-Peterdi, K.-i. Manabe, G. Kovacs, and Y. Okada Macula densa cell signaling involves ATP release through a maxi anion channel PNAS, April 1, 2003; 100(7): 4322 - 4327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Aki, A. Nishiyama, A. Miyatake, S. Kimura, M. Kohno, and Y. Abe Role of Adenosine A1 Receptor in Angiotensin II- and Norepinephrine-Induced Renal Vasoconstriction J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2002; 303(1): 117 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nishiyama and L. G. Navar ATP mediates tubuloglomerular feedback Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): R273 - R275. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Schnermann Response to A. Nishiyama and L. G. Navar: ATP mediates tubuloglomerular feedback Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): R278 - R278. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nishiyama and L. G. Navar Response to J. Schnermann: Adenosine mediates tubuloglomerular feedback Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): Ra278 - Ra280. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nishiyama, D. M. Seth, and L. G. Navar Renal Interstitial Fluid Concentrations of Angiotensins I and II in Anesthetized Rats Hypertension, January 1, 2002; 39(1): 129 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. W. Inscho P2 receptors in regulation of renal microvascular function Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2001; 280(6): F927 - F944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nishiyama, E. W. Inscho, and L. G. Navar Interactions of adenosine A1 and A2a receptors on renal microvascular reactivity Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2001; 280(3): F406 - F414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nishiyama, S. Kimura, H. He, K. Miura, M. Rahman, Y. Fujisawa, T. Fukui, and Y. Abe Renal interstitial adenosine metabolism during ischemia in dogs Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2001; 280(2): F231 - F238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Nishiyama, D. S. A. Majid, M. Walker III, A. Miyatake, and L. G. Navar Renal Interstitial ATP Responses to Changes in Arterial Pressure During Alterations in Tubuloglomerular Feedback Activity Hypertension, February 1, 2001; 37(2): 753 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |