This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Methods Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wang, Q. Articles by Lin, J. J.-C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wang, Q. Articles by Lin, J. J.-C. Pubmed/NCBI databases Gene GEO Profiles HomoloGene UniGene Related Collections Gene therapy Developmental biology Gene expression Gene regulation Myogenesis

(Circulation Research. 2000;86:478.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.

Molecular Medicine

Identification of cis Elements in the Cardiac Troponin T Gene Conferring Specific Expression in Cardiac Muscle of Transgenic Mice

Q. Wang, C. D. Sigmund, J. J.-C. Lin

From the Departments of Biological Sciences (Q.W., J.J.-C.L.) and Internal Medicine (C.D.S.), University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.

Correspondence to Jim Jung-Ching Lin, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Iowa, 138 Biology Building, Iowa City, IA 52242-1324. E-mail jim-lin{at}uiowa.edu

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Abstract—To investigate the underlying mechanism regulating cardiac gene expression, transgenic mice carrying the rat cardiac troponin T proximal promoter (-497 bp from the transcriptional start site) fused to a LacZ or chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter gene were analyzed. The LacZ expression pattern throughout development was very similar to that of the endogenous cardiac troponin T gene. Within this promoter, a high degree of sequence homology was found at 2 sites, modules D (-335 to -289 bp) and F (-249 to -209 bp). Both regions contain at least a TCTG(G/C) direct repeat and an A/T-rich site, whereas only the F module has a muscle enhancer factor 2 (MEF2)-like motif. No significant decrease in CAT transgene expression was observed when only the MEF2 core sequence was mutated. However, when the MEF2 core sequence and its flanking TCTGG site were mutated (Mut5), CAT transgene expression was significantly decreased in the heart, and ectopic expression of the transgene was also observed. When mutations were introduced into this promoter to destroy all upstream TCTG(G/C) direct repeats in the D module (MutD), CAT expression remained cardiac specific, but the expression level was dramatically decreased. Relaxation of cardiac-specific transgene expression became even more severe in transgenic mice carrying double mutations (Mut[D+5]). In addition, CAT activity in the heart was nearly abolished. These results suggest that D and F modules have an additive function in determining the level of expression in the heart and only the F module confers cardiac-specific expression.

Key Words: transgenic mice • promoter • TCTG(G/C) direct repeat • A/T-rich region • cardiac-specific gene expression

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The discovery of the MyoD family of proteins, which are members of the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors, greatly advanced our understanding of the molecular mechanisms that regulate skeletal muscle differentiation.^{1 2 3 4 5 6} Although cardiac and skeletal muscle are both derived from mesoderm and express many of the same muscle genes, skeletal muscle basic helix-loop-helix proteins are not detected in the heart. Furthermore, mice lacking the MyoD family genes have normal beating hearts.^{7 8 9} Studies of heterokaryons between muscle cells and fibroblasts provide clear evidence that the cardiac muscle phenotype is recessive, in contrast to a dominant skeletal muscle phenotype.¹⁰ These results also suggest that cardiac myogenesis may occur through a combinatorial pathway, differing from the master-regulatory mechanism seen in skeletal myogenesis. Recent promoter studies of muscle protein genes^{11 12 13 14 15} have also documented that distinct cis-regulatory elements in these promoters are required for muscle specificity in cardiac versus skeletal muscle. Thus, the question remaining is how cardiac-specific gene expression is controlled.

As development proceeds, rat cardiac troponin T (cTnT) mRNAs can be detected in the developing heart and in some developing skeletal muscles. However, the level of cTnT expression in developing skeletal muscle is much lower than that in the developing heart. This aspect is different from that for the chick cTnT gene.¹⁶ At late fetal stages, transcription of the rat cTnT gene is specifically repressed in developing skeletal muscle. The cTnT proteins detected in skeletal muscles progressively decline and disappear 2 weeks after birth.¹⁷ In the adult, cTnT is expressed only in cardiomyocytes. Thus, the rat cTnT gene is an excellent model for studying cardiac-specific gene expression and for defining cardiac-specific trans-acting factors. We have previously identified a cis-regulatory 41-bp region (F module) within the proximal -497-bp promoter of the cTnT gene, which is sufficient to direct significant expression in cultured neonatal cardiomyocytes.¹⁸ In the present study, several site-directed mutants were generated and examined for their promoter activities in both cultured neonatal cardiomyocytes and transgenic mice. Results suggest that 2 sequence homologous modules, D and F, within this promoter are important in determining cardiac specificity and the level of transgene expression.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Site-Directed Mutagenesis
Site-directed mutagenesis was performed with plasmid pBCAT2¹⁸ as a template using the Transformer Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Clontech). The resulting mutant promoters are called Mut1 for the 3-bp change in the core sequence of the MEF2-like motif and Mut5 for the 4-bp change in the MEF2-like motif and 1-bp change in the upstream TCTG(G/C) direct repeat. During the isolation of Mut5, we obtained a second site mutation, MutD, which includes a 13-bp deletion (from -322 to -310 bp) and a 6-bp change (gCTGGtacat [changes in lowercase]) in module D. As a result, a double mutant promoter in MutD and Mut5 was generated and named Mut(D+5).

Generation and Analysis of Transgenic Mice
The use of laboratory animals in the present study was in accordance with guidelines approved by IACUC. Our institution has a current PHS animal welfare assurance.

pBCAT2 and the mutant constructs were used to generate transgenic mice as described.¹⁹ Transgenic founders were identified by PCR and dot-blot hybridization of tail biopsy DNA for the presence of CAT gene. The relative ratio of CAT to a single gene, caldesmon,²⁰ in dot blots was used as a reference for comparison of transgene copy numbers. Transgenic and nontransgenic littermates at 4 to 6 weeks were euthanized, and tissues were homogenized in buffer A and analyzed for CAT activities.¹⁸ Total proteins in various tissues were determined by the Bradford method.²¹ Mann-Whitney tests²² were performed for data comparisons between transgenic and nontransgenic littermates of the same founders and for data comparisons between the wild-type and various mutant promoters.

To generate the cTnT-LacZ transgenic mice, plasmid BCAT-LacZ was constructed by ligation of the XbaI(fill in)-BamHI fragment from pBCAT2 with the XhoI(fill in)-BamHI fragment from pSDKlacZPA (a generous gift of Dr Ju Chen, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, Calif) containing the LacZ and simian virus 40 poly(A) cassette. Whole-mount ß-galactosidase (ß-gal) staining of cTnT-LacZ embryos was performed, and embryos were then sectioned at 7 µm.

Cell Culture
Neonatal cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts were prepared from 3-day-old rats.¹⁸ Mouse fibroblast line C3H 10T1/2 cells were grown in DMEM containing 10% FCS.

Cell Transfection and CAT and Luciferase Assays
Cells grown on a 60-mm dish were transfected by the N-[1-(2,3-Dioleoyloxy)propyl]-N,N,N-trimethylammonium methylsulfate (DOTAP) method (Boehringer Mannheim) with 5 µg of test plasmid and 1 µg of reference plasmid pCH110 (Pharmacia) containing the LacZ gene. At 36 to 48 hours after transfection, CAT activities were determined¹⁸ and normalized against ß-gal activities measured by the Miller²³ method.

To replace the CAT reporter gene with a firefly luciferase gene, pcTNT-249 and pcTNT-208¹⁸ were digested to release the CAT cassette and ligated with the NheI-BamHI(fill in) fragment from a pGL3 plasmid (Promega) containing the luciferase cassette. Cells grown on a 35-mm dish were transfected with 2 µg of cTnT promoter–firefly luciferase constructs, 0.25 µg of pCDNA1.1-MEF2C (a generous gift of Dr E.N. Olson, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex), and 0.2 µg of reference plasmid pRL-TK (Promega) containing the Renilla luciferase gene. The activities of firefly and Renilla luciferase were measured by the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay (Promega) at 36 to 48 hours after transfection. The firefly luciferase activities were normalized against the Renilla luciferase activities.

An expanded Materials and Methods section is available online at http://www.circresaha.org.

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
We have previously shown that the cTnT proximal promoter can drive a high level of reporter gene expression in cultured cardiomyocytes, but not in fibroblasts.¹⁸ This promoter contains a Nkx2.5 binding site, 2 modules (D and F with sequence homology), 2 CArG boxes, a MCAT motif, an AP2 site, and a TATA box (Figure 1). Both D and F modules contain at least a TCTG(G/C) direct repeat and an A/T-rich region. In addition, the F module has an MEF2-like motif located in between the direct repeat and the A/T-rich region. Previous deletion analyses of this promoter revealed that in cultured cardiomyocytes, the F module (F41) is sufficient to direct a minimal level of cardiac-specific expression of a reporter gene.¹⁸ Because transcription factors MEF2A and HF1b have been shown to bind the MEF2 consensus motif and regulate transcription of cardiac-specific genes,^{24 25} we have first examined whether these factors can bind to the F module in an antibody supershift assay with antibodies against MEF2A (a generous gift of Dr Y-T. Yu, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn) or HF1b (a generous gift of Dr K.R. Chien, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, Calif). There was no supershift observed (Figure 2), suggesting that the binding factor on the F module is neither MEF2A nor HF1b. To further examine whether MEF2C factor is able to transactivate the cTnT promoter through the MEF2-like motif, 2 plasmids, pcTNT-249-luc and pcTNT-208-luc, were constructed. The pcTNT-249-luc and pcTNT-208-luc have the cTnT promoter deleted to -249 and -208, respectively, so that pcTNT-249-luc contains the MEF2-like motif but pcTNT-208-luc does not (Figure 3A). The pcTNT-249-luc reporter construct drove high levels of luciferase expression in cardiomyocytes (22.19±3.21) but not in fibroblasts (2.34±0.21), whereas in the pcTNT-208-luc–transfected cells, reporter gene expression was at background levels in both cardiomyocytes (3.86±1.76) and fibroblasts (1.57±0.29, Figure 3B). These results were very similar to those obtained previously using CAT as a reporter gene.¹⁸ To test the effect of MEF2C on cTnT promoter activity, constructs pcTNT-249-luc and pcTNT-208-luc were cotransfected with the MEF2C expression vector (pCDNA1.1-MEF2C) or the empty control vector (pCDNA1.1) into cardiomyocytes (Figure 3C) and C3H 10T1/2 fibroblasts (Figure 3D). Overexpression of MEF2C slightly increased luciferase expression driven by either the cTnT-249 or the cTnT-208 promoter (Figure 3C and 3D). Thus, the slightly enhanced expression is not dependent on the presence of the MEF2-like motif. As a positive control, MEF2C strongly activated luciferase expression driven by the promoter of a muscle-specific gene, mXin,²⁶ in fibroblasts (from 0.89±0.10 to 9.83±2.18).

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. Diagram of the rat -497-bp cTnT promoter. Both D and F modules contain at least 1 A/T-rich site and 1 TCTG(G/C) direct repeat. Relative positions of the TCTG(G/C) sequence are indicated by arrows. The A/T-rich site in the F module is identical to that found in the D module. The F module contains another A/T-rich core sequence within a consensus MEF2 site (MEF2-like motif).

View larger version (43K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 2. Antibody supershift assays with the F41 (from -249 to -209 bp) probe. Protein extracts (10 µg) prepared from adult rat hearts were preincubated with increasing amounts of preimmune serum, anti-MEF2A serum, or anti-HF1b serum before the 32P-labeled F41 probe was added. The DNA-protein complexes were resolved on 6% nondenaturing gel. A through C, The 3 DNA-protein complexes formed with F41 and heart extract. There is no decrease or shift of these complexes as a result of treatment with antibodies, suggesting that MEF2A or HF1b protein may not be involved in the formation of these DNA-protein complexes.

View larger version (26K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 3. Diagram of cTnT promoter–luciferase fusion genes and their relative luciferase activities. A, Plasmids, pcTNT-249-luc and pcTNT-208-luc, contain promoter fragments –249 bp and –208 bp, respectively, of the cTnT gene fused to the firefly luciferase reporter gene. B, Relative promoter activities driven by the cTnT promoter–luciferase fusion genes in cardiomyocytes vs fibroblasts expressed as relative luciferase activities after normalization with Renilla luciferase activities in each transfection. Shown are average and SD of at least 3 independent transfections. C, Relative promoter activities driven by the cTnT promoter–luciferase fusion genes in cardiomyocytes cotransfected with the MEF2C expression vector (pCDNA1.1-MEF2C) or the empty vector (pCDNA1.1) expressed as relative luciferase activities after normalization with Renilla luciferase activities. D, Relative promoter activities driven by the cTnT promoter–luciferase fusion genes in fibroblasts cotransfected with the MEF2C expression vector (pCDNA1.1-MEF2C) or the empty vector (pCDNA1.1) expressed as relative luciferase activities after normalization with Renilla luciferase activities. Expression of the MEF2C protein did not significantly transactivate either promoter construct in fibroblasts, whereas the expression of MEF2C alone can transactivate luciferase activity driven by a muscle-specific gene, mXin.26

Modules D and F Have an Additive Stimulatory Effect on the Expression of the cTnT Gene in Cardiomyocytes
To investigate the relative roles of module D and F within the -497-bp promoter in determining cardiac-specific expression of the cTnT gene, site-directed mutagenesis was performed and subsequent effects on the transcription of a reporter CAT gene were examined. These constructs (Figure 4A) were transfected into cultured neonatal rat cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts. The wild-type construct, BCAT2, led to high levels of CAT gene expression in cardiomyocytes (Figure 4B) but not in fibroblasts (Figure 4C). CAT expression was decreased to 69% by a 3-bp change in the core sequence of the MEF2-like motif in the F module (Mut1) and further decreased to 51% by a 5-bp mutation in the MEF2-like site and its flanking TCTGG sequence (Mut5, Figure 4B). The alteration in the D region alone (MutD) decreased CAT activity to 61% of that observed with wild-type BCAT2 (Figure 4B). Interestingly, the double mutant promoter, Mut(D+5), reduced reporter expression to 19% of that observed with BCAT2 (Figure 4B). These results suggest that the D and F modules have an additive stimulatory effect on the expression of the cTnT gene in cardiomyocytes. It is noteworthy that CAT activities of Mut5, MutD, and Mut(D+5) promoters in cardiac fibroblasts was significantly higher than that of the wild-type promoter (P<0.05, Figure 4C). These results suggest that these mutant promoters have relaxed their cardiac specificity. However, this possibility should be confirmed in transgenic mice carrying these mutant promoters. On the contrary, CAT activity of Mut1 in fibroblasts seemed to be lower than that of the wild type (Figure 4C). We confirmed these data with a luciferase reporter gene, of which the product can be measured in an easier and more sensitive way. Similar results were obtained (Figure 4D and 4E). Consistently, the luciferase activity of Mut1 in fibroblasts was significantly lower than that of the wild type (P<0.05) (Figure 4E).

View larger version (40K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 4. Relative promoter activities of the wild-type and mutant cTnT promoters in cultured neonatal cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts. A, Diagram of the wild-type promoter and promoters containing mutations in modules D and F. Lowercase letters indicate mutated sequences. Empty spaces within parentheses correspond to deleted sequences. B and C, Relative CAT activities driven by the wild-type and mutant cTnT promoters in cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts, respectively. Values were normalized for transfection efficiency using the expressed ß-gal activity from the cotransfected plasmid pCH110. D and E, Relative luciferase activities driven by the wild-type and mutant cTnT promoters in cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts, respectively. Values were normalized for transfection efficiency using the Renilla luciferase activity from the reference plasmid pRL-TK. B through E, Average and SD from at least 3 independent transfections.

The Proximal -497-bp Promoter of the cTnT Gene Can Drive Cardiac-Specific Expression In Vivo
To determine whether the proximal promoter of the cTnT gene is sufficient to drive cardiac-specific expression in vivo, transgenic mouse lines were generated using the BCAT2 construct with a LacZ or CAT reporter gene. As can be seen in Figure 5, the LacZ reporter gene driven by the –497-bp promoter is specifically expressed in the paired cardiogenic mesoderm of a day 7.5 postcoitum (p.c.) embryo (Figure 5A) and in the looping heart tube of a day 8.0 p.c. embryo (Figure 5C). A cross section of the day 8.0 p.c. transgenic embryo showed that the LacZ gene is specifically expressed in the myocardial cells (Figure 5E). As development proceeds, LacZ expression is distributed uniformly throughout both atria and ventricles of developing mouse embryos. By day 10.5 p.c., a low level of LacZ expression starts to be detected in developing somites (data not shown). At fetal stages, LacZ expression is also detected in developing skeletal muscles, such as intercostal muscles; brachial muscles; muscles in metacarpal bones, metatarsal bones, and lower legs (compare Figure 6A and 6B); and muscles surrounding the developing vertebrae (data not shown). However, the level of transgene expression in the developing skeletal muscle is much lower than that seen in the developing heart (compare Figure 6A and 6C). In the adult, LacZ is expressed only in the heart, but not in other tissues tested, including skeletal muscles, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, brain, stomach, and intestine (data not shown). This transgene expression pattern was observed in developing mice of 3 independent founders and is very similar to that of endogenous rat cTnT gene. For BCAT2 transgenic mice with a CAT reporter gene, 4 independent transgenic founders were established. Protein extracts from various tissues of transgenic mice at 4 to 6 weeks of age were isolated and assayed for CAT activity. Tissues from nontransgenic mice were also harvested and analyzed as negative controls. In all BCAT2 transgenic lines, CAT is strongly expressed in the heart but not in other tissues, including intestine, lung, liver, kidney, spleen, skeletal muscle, stomach, and brain (see Table I online, http://www.circresaha.org). These results suggest that the proximal -497-bp promoter of the cTnT gene is sufficient to confer cardiac-specific expression in vivo and faithfully recapitulates endogenous cTnT expression during development.

View larger version (73K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 5. Timed transgenic -497 cTnT-LacZ embryos stained in whole mount for ß-gal activities. A and B, Day 7.5 p.c. transgenic and nontransgenic mouse embryos, respectively. ß-Gal–positive staining was detected in precardiogenic mesoderm flanking the primitive streak (ps). Bar, 0.2 mm. C and D, Day 8.0 p.c. transgenic and nontransgenic embryos, respectively. ß-Gal staining was seen specifically in the looping heart tube. Bar, 0.2 mm. E, Cross section of the day 8.0 p.c. transgenic embryo shown in panel C at the indicated white line. ß-Gal–positive staining was detected only in the myocardium (Mc) but not in the endocardium (Ec). NT indicates neural tube; FG, foregut. Bar=115 µm.

View larger version (96K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 6. ß-Gal staining of day 17.0 p.c. transgenic and nontransgenic embryos. A and B, Day 17.0 p.c. transgenic and nontransgenic mouse embryos without hearts, respectively. Low level of ß-gal–positive staining was detected in developing skeletal muscles, including muscles around the ribs and vertebrae and in the limbs. Staining detected in the gut may be due to the endogenous galactosidase activity present in the gut, because both transgenic and nontransgenic embryos showed similar activity in their guts. IM indicates intercostal muscles; BM, brachial muscles; Mc, muscles in metacarpals; Mt, muscles in metatarsals; LL, muscles in lower legs; and G, gut. Bar=1 mm. C and D, Hearts of day 17.0 p.c. transgenic and nontransgenic embryos, respectively. Strong ß-gal staining was seen throughout the whole heart of the transgenic embryo. Bar=0.5 mm.

Modules D and F Have Additive Stimulatory Effects in the Heart and Inhibitory Effects in the Stomach
To understand the roles of the D and F modules in regulating cardiac-specific expression in vivo, constructs carrying Mut1, Mut5, MutD, or the Mut(D+5) mutation were used to generate transgenic mouse lines. Except line 5228/2, the relative copy number of transgene in all founder lines used in this study ranged from 1 to 7, as normalized with a single-copy caldesmon gene. However, there was no obvious correlation between copy numbers and expression levels of the transgene in these lines. In transgenic mice carrying a 3-bp change in the A/T-rich core of the MEF2-like motif (Mut1), CAT activity was slightly decreased (P=0.12) in the heart as compared with wild-type BCAT2 transgenic lines and was undetectable in other tissues (see Tables II and VI online, http://www.circresaha.org). In transgenic mice carrying the construct with a 4-bp change in the MEF2-like motif and a 1-bp change in the TCTGG sequence (Mut5), CAT expression was further decreased in the heart as compared with BCAT2 (P=0.06) and as compared with Mut1 (P<0.05, see Tables III and VI online, http://www.circresaha.org; Figure 7). Interestingly, CAT activity was also detected in the stomach (P<0.05) of transgenic mice of all analyzed founders carrying the Mut5 construct (see Table III online, http://www.circresaha.org; Figure 7) and in the intestine of line 5185/2 and 5228/2 transgenic mice (see Table III online http://www.circresaha.org). These results suggest that the A/T-rich core of the MEF2-like motif and its flanking sequence have dual effects on the cTnT expression—a stimulatory effect in the heart but an inhibitory effect in the stomach. In transgenic mice carrying mutations disrupting the upstream TCTG(G/C) direct repeat (MutD), CAT expression remained cardiac specific (P<0.05, see Table IV online, http://www.circresaha.org), but the expression level was dramatically decreased (P<0.05, see Table VI online, http://www.circresaha.org; Figure 7). In transgenic mice carrying double mutations in both the D and F modules (Mut[D+5]), CAT activity in the heart was greatly diminished (see Table V online, http://www.circresaha.org), whereas CAT expression in the stomach and intestine were increased (P<0.05) as compared with the BCAT2 transgenic mice (see Tables V and VI online, http://www.circresaha.org; Figure 7). In transgenic line 2698/1 and 2707/2, CAT expression was also detected in the brain (P<0.05, see Table V online, http://www.circresaha.org). These results confirm that the D and F elements have additive functions in controlling cTnT expression.

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 7. Comparisons of CAT activities expressed in the heart and stomach of the wild-type BCAT2 and the mutant transgenic mice. CAT activity of each construct is shown as percentage of the BCAT2 construct. Values are average and SD obtained from all respective founder lines shown in Table IV online, http://www.circresaha.org.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
In the present study, we have shown that in transgenic mice, the proximal -497-bp promoter of the rat cTnT gene is able to drive cardiac-specific expression of a reporter gene since early embryonic stages. The temporal and spatial expression patterns of transgenes driven by the cTnT proximal promoter are different from that driven by –myosin heavy chain (MHC) and ß-MHC or ventricular myosin light chain 2 promoters, which are commonly used in transgenic overexpression experiments. The ventricular myosin light chain 2 promoter is used to drive ventricle-specific expression. The ß-MHC promoter can drive reporter gene expression in the developing heart; however, the expression level decreases dramatically after birth. On the other hand, the -MHC promoter is often used to drive gene expression after birth, although this promoter is very active in the atria of embryonic heart. Different from these promoters, the –497-bp cTnT promoter drives reporter expression in myocardial cells throughout both atria and ventricles at all developmental stages. Although the reporter is also transiently expressed in the developing skeletal muscles at fetal stages, the expression level is much lower than that in the heart. Thus, the -497-bp cTnT promoter may serve as an alternative to drive the expression of a foreign gene in both developing and adult mouse hearts. In addition, the present study identified 2 critical elements within the -497-bp cTnT promoter, the D and F modules, which act together to achieve a high level of expression specifically in the heart. Sequence analysis reveals that a portion (-319 to -289 bp) of the D module has a high degree of sequence homology to the F module. Similar to the F module, the D module contains an A/T-rich site and 3 TCTG(G/C) sequences potentially forming 2 direct repeats but no MEF2-like motif. Mutations that disrupt these direct repeat sequences in the D module (MutD) greatly diminish promoter activity in the heart but do not alter the cardiac specificity of transgene expression (see Table IV online, http://www.circresaha.org). This result suggests that the D module may function as an enhancer to increase transcription of the cTnT gene. In a separate study using cultured cardiomyocytes, we have shown that a synthetic D2 module containing a TCTG(G/C) direct repeat and an A/T-rich site can strongly enhance the transcription activity of the -249-bp promoter of the cTnT gene, which contains the F module but lacks the sequences from -250 to -497 bp. As such, the resulting activity is similar to that of the -497-bp promoter (Wang Q and Lin JJ-C, unpublished data, 1999).

Mice transgenic for a promoter containing mutations within the F module (Mut5) exhibit lower transgene expression and less cardiac specificity (see Table III online, http://www.circresaha.org). Coincidentally, one of the 5-bp changes in this Mut5 promoter is located in the TCTG(G/C) direct repeat of the F module, suggesting that this novel repeat sequence may play an important role in controlling cardiac-specific expression of the cTnT gene. This idea is further supported by our recent studies on this direct repeat element. In transfection studies on cultured cardiomyocytes, single-bp mutations in the TCTG(G/C) direct repeat of the F module, which either destroys the repeat sequence or creates a perfect repeat, resulted in an alteration in binding affinity and a significant decrease in -249-bp cTnT promoter activity (Wang Q and Lin JJ-C, unpublished data, 1999). Double mutations in both D and F modules (Mut[D+5]) actually altered both upstream and downstream TCTG(G/C) direct repeats. As a result of these alterations, an additive effect on reporter gene expression was observed in Mut(D+5) transgenic mice.

Given the importance of MEF2 factors in the regulation of other cardiac-specific genes, the MEF2-like sequence located in between the direct repeat and the A/T-rich site of the F module may be critical for cTnT promoter activity. However, in this study, we failed to demonstrate that MEF2A, MEF2C, or HF1b factor is capable of recognizing the MEF2-like sequence and that overexpression of MEF2C can transactivate the cTnT promoter in cardiomyocytes or fibroblasts. Moreover, we found that a 3-bp mutation within the A/T-core sequence of the MEF2-like motif (Mut1) decreased the promoter activity in both cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts (Figure 4D and 4E), suggesting that the function of this A/T sequence in the cTnT promoter may be ubiquitous rather than cardiac specific. Taken together, these data suggest that the MEF2-like motif in cTnT promoter may act as another A/T-rich site.

There is an A/T-rich sequence found in both D and F modules. Interestingly, a GATA binding site is located in the antisense strands of each these A/T-rich regions. Furthermore, there is another GATA site found in the antisense strand of the TCTG(G/C) direct repeat within the F module, and a reverse GATA site is located within the MEF2-like motif. Presently, the role of these A/T-rich/GATA sites in regulating the expression of the cTnT gene remains unknown. Our preliminary studies revealed that cotransfection of a GATA-4 expression vector and a plasmid containing the cTnT promoter–luciferase fusion gene into nonmuscle cells did not show significant transactivation. However, there is a Nkx2.5 consensus sequence found in the rat cTnT promoter from -381 to -375 bp. Recently, it has been shown that Nkx2.5 and GATA-4/5 can directly interact and synergistically transactivate certain cardiac muscle genes.^{27 28 29} Therefore, these A/T-rich/GATA sites and the Nkx2.5 site found in the rat cTnT promoter may function cooperatively to control the expression of the cTnT gene in cardiac muscle. Similarly, it has been shown that the serum response factor (CArG box-binding protein) can recruit the Nkx2.5 factor to activate cardiac -actin gene transcription.³⁰ Therefore, the possibility remains that Nkx2.5 may potentially increase cTnT transcription through interactions with the GATA factor and/or serum response factor. However, it is worthy to note that a deletion construct cTNT-303 without Nkx2.5 binding site still has as much activity as the -497-bp promoter.¹⁸ This result suggests that the potential Nkx2.5 binding site may be not required for the cTnT promoter activity in neonatal cardiomyocytes.

Three DNA-protein complexes, A, B, and C, are formed by heart extract and the F module (Figure 2). In a separate study (Wang Q and Lin JJ-C, unpublished data, 1999), we have found that an A/T-rich sequence and a protein with molecular mass of 25 kDa form the complex C. On the other hand, the novel TCTG(G/C) direct repeat upstream of the A/T-rich region in the F module is bound by proteins with molecular masses of 40 to 42 kDa to form complexes A and B. These results are consistent with the present finding that MEF2 factor is not involved in the regulation of cTnT gene expression.

	Acknowledgments

 
This work was supported in part by NIH Grant HL42266 (Specialized Center of Research in Congenital Heart Diseases) and Grant HD18577. We are grateful to Kibby Wall, Wei Sun, and Jenny L.-C. Lin for technical assistance. We thank K.R. Chien for his generous gift of anti-HF1b antisera and E.N. Olson for his generous gift of MEF2C expression vector. We thank Dr S.M. Evans for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Norma Sinclair, Lucy Robbins, and Lisa Hancox from the transgenic core facility at University of Iowa for the generation of all founder lines used in this study.

Received August 26, 1999; accepted November 29, 1999.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Olson EN. The MyoD family, a paradigm for development? Genes Dev. 1990;4:1451–1461.[Free Full Text]
2. Weintraub H, Davis R, Tapscott S, Thayer M. Krause M, Benezra R, Blackwell TK, Turner D, Rupp R, Hollenberg S, Zhuang Y, Lassar A. The MyoD gene family: nodal point during specification of the muscle cell lineage. Science. 1991;251:761–766.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Wright WE. Muscle basic helix-loop-helix proteins and the regulation of myogenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1992;2:243–248.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Sassoon DA. Myogenic regulatory factors: dissection of their role and regulation during vertebrate embryogenesis. Dev Biol. 1992;156:11–23.
5. Emerson CP. Embryology to the fore. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1993;3:265–274.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Molkentin JD, Olson EN. Defining the regulatory networks for muscle development. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1996;6:445–453.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Rudnicki MA, Schnegelsberg PN, Stead RH, Braun T, Arnold HH, Jaenisch R. MyoD or Myf-5 is required for the formation of skeletal muscle. Cell. 1993;75:1351–1359.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Nabeshima Y, Hanaoka K, Hayasaka M, Esumi E, Li S, Nonaka I, Nabeshima Y-I. Myogenin gene disruption results in perinatal lethality because of severe muscle defect. Nature. 1993;364:532–535.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Hasty P, Bradley A, Morris JH, Edmondson DG, Venuti JM, Olson EN, Klein WH. Muscle deficiency and neonatal death in mice with a targeted mutation in the myogenin gene. Nature. 1993;364:501–506.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Evans SM, Tai LJ, Tan VP, Newton CB, Chien KR. Heterokaryons of cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts reveal that lack of dominance of the cardiac muscle phenotype. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:4269–4279.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Lee KJ, Ross RS, Rockman HA, Harris AN, O’Brien TX, van Bilsen M, Shubeita HE, Kandolf R, Brem G, Price J. Myosin light chain-2 luciferase transgenic mice reveal distinct regulatory programs for cardiac and skeletal muscle-specific expression of a single contractile protein gene. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:15875–15885.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Adolph EA, Subramaniam A, Cserjesi P, Olson EN, Robbins J. Role of myocyte-specific enhancer-binding factor (MEF2) in transcriptional regulation of the -cardiac myosin heavy chain gene. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:5349–5352.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Rindt H, Knotts S, Robbins J. Segregation of cardiac and skeletal muscle-specific regulatory elements of the ß-myosin heavy chain gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:1540–1544.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Shield MA, Haugen HS, Clegg CH, Hauschka SD. E-Box sites and a proximal regulatory region of the muscle creatine kinase gene differentially regulate expression in diverse skeletal muscles and cardiac muscle of transgenic mice. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:5058–5068.[Abstract]
15. O’Mahoney JV, Guven KL, Lin J, Joya JE, Robinson CS, Wade RP, Hardeman EC. Identification of a novel slow-muscle-fiber enhancer binding protein, MusTRD1. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:6641–6652.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Cooper TA, Ordahl CP. A single cardiac troponin T gene generates embryonic and adult isoforms via developmentally regulated alternate splicing. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:11140–11148.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Saggin L, Gorza L, Ausoni S, Schiaffino S. Cardiac troponin T in developing, regenerating and denervated rat skeletal muscle. Development. 1990;110:547–554.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Wang G, Yeh H-I, Lin JJ-C. Characterization of cis-regulating elements and transactivating factors of the rat cardiac troponin T gene. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:30595–30603.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Sigmund CD. Major approaches for generating and analyzing transgenic mice: an overview. Hypertension. 1993;22:599–607.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Novy RE, Lin JL-C, Lin JJ-C. Characterization of cDNA clones encoding a human fibroblast caldesmon isoform and analysis of caldesmon expression in normal and transformed cells. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:16917–16924.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Biochemistry. 1976;72:248–254.
22. Daniel WW. Applied Nonparametric Statistics. Boston, MA: PWS-KENT Publishing Co; 1990:90–97.
23. Miller JH. Assay of ß-galactosidase. In: Experiments in Molecular Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1972:352–355.
24. Yu Y-T, Breitbart RE, Smoot LB, Lee Y, Mahdavi V, Nadal-Ginard B. Human myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2 comprises a group of tissue-restricted MADS box transcription factors. Genes Dev. 1992;6:1783–1798.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Zhu H, Nguyen VT, Brown AB, Pourhosseini A, Garcia AV, van Bilsen M, Chien KR. A novel, tissue-restricted zinc finger protein (HF-1b) binds to the cardiac regulatory element (HF1b/MEF-2) within the rat myosin light chain-2 gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1993;13:4432–4444.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Wang D-Z, Reiter RS, Lin JL-C, Wang Q, Williams HS, Krob SL, Schultheiss TM, Evans S, Lin JJ-C. Requirement of a novel gene, Xin, in cardiac morphogenesis. Development. 1999;126:1281–1294.[Abstract]
27. Durocher D, Charron F, Warren R, Schwartz RJ, Nemer M. The cardiac transcription factor Nkx2.5 and GATA-4 are mutual cofactors. EMBO J. 1997;16:5687–5696.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Lee Y, Shioi T, Kasahara H, Jobe SM, Wiese RJ, Markham BE, Izumo S. The cardiac tissue-restricted homeobox protein Csx/Nkx2.5 physically associates with the zinc finger protein GATA4 and cooperatively activates atrial natriuretic factor gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:3120–3129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Sepulveda JL, Belaguli N, Nigam V, Chen CY, Nemer M, Schwartz RJ. GATA-4 and Nkx2.5 coactivate Nkx-2 DNA binding targets: role for regulating early cardiac gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:3405–3415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Chen CY, Schwartz RJ. Recruitment of the tinman homolog Nkx2.5 by serum response factor activates cardiac -actin gene transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:6372–6384.[Abstract]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. A. Gustafson-Wagner, H. W. Sinn, Y.-L. Chen, D.-Z. Wang, R. S. Reiter, J. L.-C. Lin, B. Yang, R. A. Williamson, J. Chen, C.-I. Lin, et al. Loss of mXin{alpha}, an intercalated disk protein, results in cardiac hypertrophy and cardiomyopathy with conduction defects Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H2680 - H2692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Foshay, G. Rodriguez, B. Hoel, J. Narayan, and G. I. Gallicano JAK2/STAT3 Directs Cardiomyogenesis Within Murine Embryonic Stem Cells In Vitro Stem Cells, April 1, 2005; 23(4): 530 - 543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Jiao, H. Kulessa, K. Tompkins, Y. Zhou, L. Batts, H. S. Baldwin, and B. L.M. Hogan An essential role of Bmp4 in the atrioventricular septation of the mouse heart Genes & Dev., October 1, 2003; 17(19): 2362 - 2367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. WERNER, S. FESSELE, H. MAIER, and P. J. NELSON Computer modeling of promoter organization as a tool to study transcriptional coregulation FASEB J, July 1, 2003; 17(10): 1228 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Jane-wit, M. Yu, A. E. Edling, S. Kataoka, J. M. Johnson, L. B. Stull, C. S. Moravec, and V. K. Tuohy A Novel Class II-Binding Motif Selects Peptides That Mediate Organ-Specific Autoimmune Disease in SWXJ, SJL/J, and SWR/J Mice J. Immunol., December 1, 2002; 169(11): 6507 - 6514. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Khurana, J. F. Martin, and I. Zachary Gene Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Case for Cautious Optimism Hypertension, November 1, 2001; 38(5): 1210 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Flesch On the trail of cardiac specific transcription factors Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2001; 50(1): 3 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Methods Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wang, Q. Articles by Lin, J. J.-C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wang, Q. Articles by Lin, J. J.-C. Pubmed/NCBI databases Gene GEO Profiles HomoloGene UniGene Related Collections Gene therapy Developmental biology Gene expression Gene regulation Myogenesis