Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2000;86:302-311

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Methods
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spach, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Barr, R. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spach, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Barr, R. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Remodeling
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrow Cardiac development
(Circulation Research. 2000;86:302.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Cellular Biology

Electrophysiological Effects of Remodeling Cardiac Gap Junctions and Cell Size

Experimental and Model Studies of Normal Cardiac Growth

Madison S. Spach, J. Francis Heidlage, Paul C. Dolber, Roger C. Barr

From the Departments of Pediatrics (M.S.S., J.F.H.), Cell Biology (M.S.S.), and Biomedical Engineering (R.C.B.), Duke University Medical Center, and Department of Surgery (P.C.D.), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC.

Correspondence to Madison S. Spach, Box 3475, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail cspach{at}acpub.duke.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowExperimental Procedures
down arrowBiophysical Mechanisms: Adult...
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—The increased incidence of arrhythmias in structural heart disease is accompanied by remodeling of the cellular distribution of gap junctions to a diffuse pattern like that of neonatal cardiomyocytes. Accordingly, it has become important to know how remodeling of gap junctions due to normal growth hypertrophy alters anisotropic propagation at a cellular level (max) in relation to conduction velocities measured at a macroscopic level. To this end, morphological studies of gap junctions (connexin43) and in vitro electrical measurements were performed in neonatal and adult canine ventricular muscle. When cells enlarged, gap junctions shifted from the sides to the ends of ventricular myocytes. Electrically, normal growth produced different patterns of change at a macroscopic and microscopic level. Although the longitudinal and transverse conduction velocities were greater in adult than neonatal muscle, the anisotropic velocity ratios were the same. In the neonate, mean max was not different during longitudinal (LP) and transverse (TP) propagation. However, growth hypertrophy produced a selective increase in mean TP max (P<0.001), with no significant change in mean LP max. Two-dimensional neonatal and adult cellular computational models show that the observed increases in cell size and changes in the distribution of gap junctions are sufficient to account for the experimental results. Unexpectedly, the results show that cellular scaling (cell size) is as important (or more so) as changes in gap junction distribution in determining TP properties. As the cells enlarged, both mean TP max and lateral cell-to-cell delay increased. max increased because increases in cell-to-cell delay reduced the electric current flowing downstream up to the time of max, thus enhancing max. The results suggest that in pathological substrates that are arrhythmogenic, maintaining cell size during remodeling of gap junctions is important in sustaining a maximum rate of depolarization.


Key Words: gap junctions • structural remodeling • max • cellular scaling • anisotropic propagation


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowExperimental Procedures
down arrowBiophysical Mechanisms: Adult...
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Differences in the distribution of gap junctions are now considered to be an important factor in the origin of reentrant arrhythmias.1 Changes in the arrangement and number of gap junctions have been documented in hearts undergoing normal growth hypertrophy after birth,2 3 4 with aging,5 and in disease states such as ischemic heart disease.6 7 8 9 Gourdie et al10 suggested that alteration of coupling patterns in diseased mature hearts may result from pathological reiteration of developmental processes that determine the normal cellular organization of gap junctions. Accordingly, it has become important to know how electrophysiological changes at the cellular level (max) correlate with changes at a macroscopic-size scale, such as effective conduction velocity. However, we have been unable to find information concerning longitudinal and transverse propagation (LP and TP, respectively) in the neonatal ventricle, except for preliminary results we recently presented in a study of the foot of the action potential.11 Nor could we find information about the effects of cellular scaling (consequences of differences in size12 ) on anisotropic conduction. Therefore, we hypothesized that the anisotropic electrical effects of growth hypertrophy are due primarily to the combined effects of two factors: cellular scaling and changes in the distribution of the gap junctions.

Mean max is greater during TP than LP in adult myocardium.1 13 Fast and Kléber,14 however, found no significant difference in mean max during LP and TP in neonatal cell cultures. Stimulated by their results, we obtained preliminary max results in neonatal ventricular muscle as part of our recent study of the action potential foot, which can vary independently of max.11 Similar to the neonatal cellular cultures,14 mean max was not significantly different during LP and TP in neonatal ventricle. We interpreted the similar LP-TP max relationships in neonatal ventricular muscle and in neonatal cell cultures to be due to the diffuse cellular distribution of the gap junctions in both preparations.11 14

Mathematical models incorporating a representation of the irregularly arranged microstructural components, eg, cell shapes and gap junction distribution,15 were necessary to understand structural mechanisms of conduction events in different anisotropic substrates.16 Such electrical descriptions of the microstructure make the analysis tractable by representing the irregularly arranged microstructural components.15 Such structural models represent the corollary of the step-by-step development of increasingly complex and comprehensive models of ionic channels, pumps, and exchangers within individual cells.17 18 19 20 21 22

Accordingly, the first purpose of this study was to document the relationships between the mean values of max and the associated macroscopic conduction velocities during anisotropic propagation in neonatal and adult ventricular muscle. The second, and major, objective was to gain insight into the underlying microstructural events and into their biophysical mechanisms by determining whether the observed differences in gap junction distribution and in cell size could account for the max and conduction velocity results. We analyzed microscopic propagation events produced by (1) our adult two-dimensional (2D) cellular model;15 23 and (2) a neonatal 2D cellular model that we developed on the basis of the distribution of connexin43 in neonatal canine ventricular muscle and the geometry of isolated neonatal myocytes. The model predictions show that the observed changes in cell size and in the distribution of the gap junctions are sufficient to account for the experimental results. A noteworthy feature was that cellular scaling (differences in cell size) was as important as differences in gap junction distribution in determining TP properties.


*    Experimental Procedures
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Experimental Procedures
down arrowBiophysical Mechanisms: Adult...
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Experimental Materials and Methods
We studied in vitro ventricular epimyocardial preparations from the hearts of 6 adult dogs (weight 9 to 21 kg) and 6 neonatal dogs (age 1 day to 6 weeks). The electrophysiological methods used to study anisotropic propagation have been reported in previous articles.11 13 15 Glass microelectrodes were used to measure the intracellular potential {Phi}i at a depth of ~150 µm.11 The potential just outside each impaled cell was measured as the extracellular potential {Phi}e. The transmembrane potential (Vm) was obtained as the difference between {Phi}i and {Phi}e.11 15 LP and TP max values at the same site were used in the final analysis, which consisted of 4 sites from each of 6 adult and 6 neonatal preparations. Double labeling with anti-connexin43 antibodies and wheat germ agglutinin was applied to sections of adult and neonatal hearts to study the distribution of the gap junctions.24 To develop the neonatal 2D cellular model, isolated single myocytes were obtained from neonatal hearts.25 26 Photomicrographs of 33 neonatal myocytes were chosen for the neonatal model.27

An expanded Materials and Methods section is available online at http://www.circresaha.org.

Experimental Results
Anisotropic Propagation Events in Adult and Neonatal Ventricular Muscle
In both adult and neonatal preparations, max increased or decreased at each impalement site when conduction was changed from LP to TP.15 In the adult (Figure 1ADown), the mean TP max value (155 V/s) was significantly greater than the mean LP max value (120 V/s) (P<0.0001). Contrariwise, in the neonate the mean TP (124 V/s) and LP (118 V/s) max values were not significantly different (P=0.36). Figure 1BDown shows that, although there was no significant difference in the mean LP max values in the adult and neonatal preparations (P=0.62), mean TP max was significantly greater in adult than in neonatal ventricular muscle (P<0.0001; n=24).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of growth hypertrophy on max during LP and TP in ventricular muscle. A, Mean max values during LP and TP obtained in 6 adult and 6 neonatal ventricular preparations. In adult ventricular muscle, TP max was significantly greater than LP max. In neonatal ventricular muscle, there was no significant difference in LP max and TP max, a result similar to that of Fast and Kléber14 in the neonatal cellular monolayers. B, Comparison of mean values of max for each direction of conduction in adult and neonatal ventricular muscle. TP max was significantly greater in the adult than in the neonate, but LP max showed no significant difference in adult and neonatal ventricular muscle. Data are mean±1 SD; *P<0.001 (n=24).

In adult preparations, the average macroscopic conduction velocity was 0.50 m/s during LP and 0.17 m/s during TP, with a LP/TP velocity ratio of 2.94. In the neonatal preparations, the average velocities were lower, ie, 0.33 m/s during LP and 0.12 m/s during TP. However, the neonatal LP/TP velocity ratio of 2.75 was essentially the same as that of the adult.

Changes in the Distribution of Gap Junctions and in Cell Size
In adult ventricular myocytes (Figure 2Down, top), gap junctions were located at the transverse-oriented intercalated disks. This association produced a pattern of gap junctions located primarily near the ends of the cells, with large areas along the lateral cell borders having no gap junctions, consistent with prior descriptions.2 3 28 In the neonatal cells (Figure 2Down, bottom), however, gap junctions were distributed in a relatively uniform manner with a periodicity of 4 to 11 µm along the perimeter of the myocytes, a pattern similar to neonates of other species2 3 4 and the neonatal monolayers of Fast et al.29 To compare cell size and shape, Figure 3ADown shows representative isolated adult and neonatal left ventricular myocytes.



View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Connexin43 distribution in relation to the cardiac myocyte surface in normal adult (top) and neonatal (bottom) canine left ventricular muscle. Gap junctions (green or yellow) were labeled with antibodies to connexin43. The sarcolemma (red), including that of the intercalated disks of the adult myocytes, was labeled with wheat germ agglutinin.24 The neonatal tissue was obtained from a 1-week-old heart. Its distribution of gap junctions was typical of that in canine hearts ranging in age from 1 day to 2 months. Bar=50 µm.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Single adult and neonatal ventricular myocytes and diagrams of the basic units of the adult and neonatal 2D models. A, Representative disaggregated single left ventricular myocytes from canine adult (left side) and neonatal (right side) hearts. The cells demonstrate the considerable difference in size of the adult and neonatal cardiac myocytes. Bar=50 µm. B, Adult 33-cell basic unit and the distribution of adult cardiac gap junctions. Symbols for the three types of gap junctions assigned to each myocyte are shown beneath the adult unit.15 23 Distribution of the plicate and interplicate gap junctions at the intercalated disks is based on the work of Hoyt et al.28 Additional sites contained "combined plicate" gap junctions, which include a few small areas of gap junctional membrane consistent with the irregularities (intercalated disks) along the borders of adult myocytes. C, Neonatal 33-cell unit and the distribution of neonatal cardiac gap junctions. Neonatal cells were arranged by size to approximate as best possible the pattern of variations in relative size of the myocytes of the adult model. This feature required small adjustments to be made in the original shapes of some of the neonatal cells. To represent the distribution of neonatal gap junctions shown in Figure 2Up, a punctate gap junction was positioned every 5 to 10 µm along the borders and at the ends of the cells. To form 2D sheets or bundles of varied sizes and shapes, the 33-cell adult and neonatal units were replicated longitudinally and vertically by fitting the ends and sides together.


*    Biophysical Mechanisms: Adult and Neonatal Cellular Models
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowExperimental Procedures
*Biophysical Mechanisms: Adult...
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Development of the Neonatal Model
Details of the adult 2D cellular model have been presented previously.15 23 Here, we present the new neonatal model, which was based on the gap junction distribution and the geometry of the isolated neonatal myocytes illustrated in Figures 2Up and 3AUp. Values of the adult and neonatal 2D cellular model parameters are presented in Table 1Down.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Adult and Neonatal 2D Cellular Model Parameters With Normal Values

Myocytes
Each neonatal cell was divided into segments with x-y dimensions of 25 µm2 ({delta}x, {delta}y=5 µm) and a depth of 5.6 µm. Cytoplasmic segments were interconnected by low resistances, consistent with a specific resistivity of 250 {Omega} · cm35 (Table 1B). To represent cell boundaries, adjacent segments were isolated from one another in the designated directions, except at sites of gap junctions. The membrane area of each segment was 94 µm2, which produced a surface area-to-volume ratio of 0.66 µm-1, with a mean cell volume of 4948 µm3 (Table 1A). The basic unit of the neonatal model consisted of 33 myocytes (Figure 3CUp), and multiple units formed large cellular arrays.

Gap Junctions
A punctate gap junction was positioned every 5 to 10 µm along the lateral borders and at the ends of the cells (Figure 3CUp), which resulted in each neonatal cell being connected to an average of 6 cells (Table 1B). Normally, there are a few gap junction channels in small cells with large input resistances (Rin), and large cells with small input resistances have a large number of gap junction channels.46 47 In our case, the neonatal-adult relationships of Rin and cell size (Table 1A) predict that isolated neonatal cell pairs should have a lower effective coupling conductance gj(eff) than that of adult cell pairs. We therefore assigned each neonatal gap junction a conductance (gj) of 0.16 µS, because this value produced a mean gj(eff) value of 0.63 µS between neonatal cells in isolated pairs (n=50), a value 18% less than that in isolated adult cell pairs (Table 1B).

Calculations and Data Output
As done previously,11 15 23 we used the Hodgkin-Huxley model48 with Ebihara-Johnson kinetics18 to approximate the fast Na+ current INa as

(1)
where Na is the maximal sodium conductance (28 mS/cm2), m and h are gating parameters, and VNa is the sodium equilibrium potential (33.45 mV). We approximated a repolarization current IR by the equation

(2)
where R is the repolarization conductance (0.05 mS/cm2) and VR is the equilibrium potential of the repolarization current (-80 mV).

The mathematical formulation and computation procedures have been presented previously.11 15 23 The space constant {lambda} was determined as the distance at which the value of Vm decreased to 0.37 times its greatest value when current was injected intracellularly along a longitudinally or transversely oriented line.23 Cytoplasmic time49 was ascertained as the difference between the earliest and latest time of max within each cell. Cell-to-cell conduction delays were obtained as the time difference of max at segments on each side of the end-to-end gap junctions during LP and across the lateral midcell gap junctions during TP.

An expanded neonatal model section is available online at http://www.circresaha.org.

Adult and Neonatal Cellular Model Results
Macroscopic Conduction Velocities Related to Anisotropic Passive Properties
In the adult cellular model, the longitudinal and transverse macroscopic conduction velocities were 0.48 m/s and 0.17 m/s, respectively. In the neonatal model, the LP velocity was 0.36 m/s, and the TP velocity was 0.13 m/s. These conduction velocities agreed favorably with the experimental data in the adult and neonatal ventricular preparations (Table 1C). As found experimentally, the adult and neonatal models produced almost the same LP-to-TP velocity ratios (Table 1C).

To evaluate whether the averaged effects of the irregular-shaped cells and the gap junction distribution in the adult model produced realistic passive properties at the macroscopic level, we determined the space constants {lambda}L and {lambda}T (Table 1D). The computed {lambda}L value of 1.21 mm was within the range of 0.76 to 1.3 mm measured in adult canine ventricular muscle.42 43 We know of no experimental data to compare with the computed {lambda}T value of 0.37 mm.

We then used continuous cable equations50 to obtain the effective axial resistivity13 along the longitudinal and transverse axes according to

(3)

(4)
where Ra is the effective axial resistivity, {lambda} is the space constant in either the longitudinal or transverse direction, Rm has a value of 20 K{Omega} · cm2, and a is the radius of a continuous cable that has the cross-sectional area of the individual segments (113 µm2) in the adult model. Table 1D shows that the derived Ra values along the longitudinal and transverse axes of the adult model agreed favorably with Clerc’s45 experimental results in bovine ventricular muscle; ie, RaL=410 {Omega} cm (Clerc: 402 {Omega} · cm), and RaT=4382 {Omega} · cm (Clerc: 3620 {Omega} · cm).

To make certain that the neonatal {lambda} and Ra values related to the adult values at a macroscopic level as expected by cable analysis in relation to conduction velocity, we determined {lambda} and Ra for the neonatal 2D cellular model. Both {lambda}L (0.73 mm) and {lambda}T (0.21 mm) were less, and Ra was greater, in the neonatal than in the adult cellular model (Table 1D), results consistent with the lower LP and TP velocities in the neonate compared with the adult in accordance with continuous cable theory.45 50 We know of no anisotropic experimental data for comparisons of these neonatal model results. However, the values of {lambda}L and {lambda}T in the neonatal model were close to the {lambda} of 0.36 mm measured by Jongsma and van Rijn44 in isotropic cellular cultures of neonatal rat myocytes.

max Mean Values and Cell-to-Cell Delays
In the adult cellular model, the TP max mean value of 178 V/s was significantly greater than the LP max mean value of 164 V/s (Figure 4ADown), as expected (P<0.001, n=490).15 However, in the neonatal cellular network there was no significant difference in the mean values of TP max (164 V/s) and LP max (163.9 V/s) (P=0.83, n=490). Thus, the LP-TP mean max relationships in the adult and neonatal cellular models were in good agreement with the experimental data of Figure 1Up. Additional experimental max relationships reproduced were the following: (1) mean LP max was not significantly different in the adult and neonatal cellular networks (P=0.52), and (2) mean TP max was significantly greater in the adult than in the neonatal model (P<0.001). The max values of Figure 4ADown were slightly higher than those measured in vitro (Figure 1Up), probably because of the Na value (28 mS/cm2) used in all segments of both models. Although overall increases or decreases in Na produced corresponding changes in max, the above LP-TP max relationships of the adult and neonatal models were maintained.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. max and delays of impulse transfer between cells during anisotropic propagation in the adult and neonatal 2D cellular models. A, Mean max values during LP and TP in the adult and neonatal cellular models. B, Mean LP cell-to-cell delays across adjoining end-to-end cell borders and mean TP cell-to-cell delays across lateral cell borders. The cell-to-cell delay results were obtained in adult and neonatal groups of 22 adjoining cells. Data are mean±1 SD; *P<0.001.

The mean delays of impulse transfer between cells during LP and TP had the same relationships as the mean max values in the adult and neonatal cellular networks (Figure 4BUp), which suggested that these 2 parameters were linked. In the adult, the mean cell-to-cell delay was much greater during TP (178 µs) than during LP (90 µs) (P<0.001). In the neonatal cellular network (Figure 4BUp, right), however, there was no significant difference in the mean cell-to-cell delays during LP (68 µs) and TP (75 µs) (P=0.28).

Intracellular max Variations During LP and TP in Adult and Neonatal Cells
The representative result of Figure 5Down (left) shows that TP max exceeded LP max throughout most adult cells. In a few adult cells, LP max exceeded TP max in small regions near the intercalated disks (not shown).15 In groups of neonatal cells, LP max exceeded TP max throughout some cells, and the opposite relationship occurred in other cells (Figure 5Down, right). Averaging the changing dominance of LP versus TP max from 1 cell to the next accounted for the similar neonatal LP and TP mean max values.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Intracellular LP-TP max relationships in groups of adult and neonatal cells. The values of max were computed for each segment along the horizontal dashed line in the drawings of each group of cells. Vertical dashed lines mark end-to-end cellular connections. In each graph, the values of max are plotted as a function of the associated distance scales, which are different for the adult and smaller neonatal cells. Hatched areas represent intracellular locations at which TP max exceeded LP max. The direction of LP was left to right, and the direction of TP was bottom to top.

To gain insight into the relation between max and the excitation sequence inside cells, we analyzed 25 adult and 25 neonatal cells, considered as pairs. Each neonatal cell was approximately one-half the size of the adult cell. During LP in both adult and neonatal cells, the lowest max values occurred in the region of slowest conduction near the input gap junctions (Figure 6ADown). max fluctuations were greater in the adult than in the neonatal cells. In the input region, max was lower in the adult cell than in its neonatal counterpart, whereas in the central-to-distal region, this relationship reversed. Consequently, averaging the different LP max relationships in the proximal and distal intracellular regions produced similar adult and neonatal LP max mean values.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Spatial distribution of max related to the spread of excitation within individual adult and neonatal cells during LP (A) and TP (B). Each graph is accompanied by drawings of a matched adult and neonatal cell in which the length and width of the neonatal cell (bottom) are approximately one-half the dimensions of the accompanying adult cell (top). In each cell, isochrones depict the intracellular activation sequence. During LP, the intracellular isochrones are separated by 4 µs, and during TP, they are separated by 3 µs. max of the adult cells is plotted as a function of the distance noted above each graph, and max of the neonatal cells is plotted along the distance noted below each graph. Hatched areas represent comparable intracellular regions in which adult max values (solid lines) exceeded neonatal max values (dashed lines). Arrows mark direction of propagation. In panel B1, the microcollision in the adult cell is marked by an asterisk.

A major feature of TP (Figure 6BUp) was the almost simultaneous excitation of the membrane throughout both adult and neonatal cells (14 to 28 µs). At the ends of a few adult cells, max decreased to values below those in neonatal cells (Figure 6BUp1). However, these few low max values had little influence on overall significantly greater TP max in the adult cells.

Microcollisions
To determine whether the development of intracellular microcollisions29 accounted for the increasing TP max secondary to growth hypertrophy, we compared TP excitation sequences and max values within the 25 adult-neonatal cell pairs. We did not find microcollisions within neonatal cells, a result similar to that of Fast et al.29 in dense neonatal cell cultures. Four adult cells (16%) demonstrated microcollisions, and these cells had max values in the highest range encountered, 192 to 202 V/s (Figure 6BUp1). Contrariwise, 9 other adult cells (36%) without microcollisions demonstrated similar max values within this range (Figure 6BUp2).

To determine whether an absence of microcollisions altered the overall LP-TP mean max relationships in the adult cellular network, we compared LP and TP max at 160 randomly chosen sites in adult cells without microcollisions. In the absence of microcollisions in adult cells, mean TP max (179 V/s) remained unchanged from the original value (178 V/s), and mean TP max also remained significantly greater than mean LP max (P<0.001). Consequently, microcollisions did not account for the increase in TP max produced by growth hypertrophy, nor did microcollisions account for the greater TP than LP mean max in adult cells.

Why Does TP max Increase Relative to LP max?
In the longitudinal direction, the shift of connexin43 from the sides to the ends of the cells (Figure 2Up) maintains tight end-to-end coupling between myocytes as they enlarge, as evidenced by the small change in mean cell-to-cell delay during LP (Figure 4BUp). Consequently, LP remained overall a smooth process in both cellular networks. In the transverse direction, the cells became increasingly isolated from their lateral neighbors when they enlarged. During TP, the increased lateral detachment produced a prominent increase in mean lateral cell-to-cell delay of 103 µs (from 75 to 178 µs; P<0.001), but the very short mean cytoplasmic time of 26 µs in the neonatal cells was not significantly different from that of the cytoplasmic time of the adult cells (23 µs; P=0.72).

To understand more easily the mechanism involved in the delays between cells, we simplified the problem by considering the membrane of 2 segments in juxtaposed cells (Figure 7ADown). As the capacitance of the membrane in the segment of the upstream cell (proximal segment X) is discharged up to the time of its max, depolarization will be slowed, because segment X also supplies current to a similar segment in the next cell downstream (distal segment Y). Furthermore, up to the time at which its max occurs, segment X will supply relatively less of its current to distal segment y in the presence of longer than shorter cell-to-cell delays. As a corollary, at the time of max in segment X, its depolarization should be more rapid in the presence of a longer delay of transfer of the action potential to segment Y in the next cell.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Quantitative index of charge-transfer mechanism that produced lower TP mean max values in neonatal than adult cellular networks. A, Schematic representation of the charge supplied by intracellular current Ii in 2 segments of membrane in juxtaposed cells during TP. X represents the segment in the proximal cell, Y, the segment in the distal cell; Qx and Qy, the charge that concurrently discharges the membrane capacitance of the respective segments up to the time of max in proximal segment X; and dashed line, electrotonic current to cells beyond Y, which is ignored. B, Segments X and Y in neonatal juxtaposed cells. C, Segments X and Y in adult juxtaposed cells. In panels B and C, the drawings of laterally juxtaposed cells illustrate the 2 segments of sarcolemmal membrane (solid rectangles) that are separated by the lateral borders of each cell and the accompanying gap junctions. Vertical arrows indicate the direction of TP. Each vertical line superimposed on the action potentials of the two segments represents the time of max in proximal segment X. Hatched areas represent the potential difference during depolarization of the 2 segments up to the time of max in proximal segment X. The total charge of proximal segment X up to the time of its max is that used to discharge its own membrane capacitance (horizontal arrow at x) plus that concurrently supplied to discharge the capacitance of distal segment Y (horizontal arrow at y). As shown, the relative amount of total charge supplied to the distal segment at the time of the vertical line was less in the adult cells, with the greater cell-to-cell delays and higher max values. In the 2 neonatal cells of panel B, max was 162 and 169 V/s, with a cell-to-cell delay of 72 µs (time difference between max in segments X and Y). In the 2 adult cells of panel C, max was 186 and 189 V/s, with a cell-to-cell delay of 266 µs. Time scale at the bottom denotes that the duration of all of the action potential upstrokes (from the onset of the foot to the peak of the upstroke) was {approx}2.4 ms.

Figure 7AUp illustrates how a quantitative index of this electrotonic mechanism can be obtained during TP by analyzing the action potential upstrokes in the two segments. The intracellular current Ii supplied to segment X up to the time of its max is distributed in the following 2 ways: (1) the net charge Qx that discharges the membrane capacitance of segment X, and (2) the net charge Qy that concurrently discharges the membrane capacitance of a similar segment in the next cell at segment Y. (Smaller amounts of charge, which are ignored here, are also distributed to cells beyond Y.) Thus, an index of the downstream current load on proximal segment x at the time of its max is the percentage of the total charge (Qx+Qy) that is supplied to distal segment Y, given as

(5)

The net charge Qm (nanocoulombs [nC]/cm2) responsible for membrane depolarization in each segment up to the time of the vertical lines in Figure 7BUp and 7CUp (the time of max in segment x) can be calculated as Qm=CmVm, where Cm is the membrane capacitance (1 µF/cm2) and Vm is the difference between the resting potential and the membrane potential at that time; eg, 1 mV depolarization=1 nC/cm2 net charge displaced. As long as there is no significant charge supplied to the distal segment by its own Na+ current, all of Qy is supplied from an upstream segment. During TP in the adult network (long cell-to-cell delays), none of the distal segments (n=15) demonstrated activation of INa before max in the proximal segment (vertical line in Figure 7CUp). In the neonatal network (short cell-to-cell delays), all distal segments demonstrated that the earliest phase of INa activation had started by this time (vertical line in Figure 7BUp), but the charge supplied by the beginning of INa activation in distal segment y was small, averaging only 0.33 nC/cm2 (n=15). For example, it was 1.4% (0.7 nC/cm2) of the 47.5-nC/cm2 depolarizing charge of segment y at the time of the vertical line in Figure 7BUp. Thus, in both neonatal and adult cellular networks, during TP essentially all of the depolarizing current of segment y was electrotonic up to the time of the vertical line in Figure 7BUp and 7CUp. The results were not model-dependent, as we found similar results using the Luo-Rudy phase 1 model.19

There was also no significant contribution of the slow inward current Isi (L-type calcium current17 19 ) on charge transfer from segment X to segment Y. The longest TP delay we encountered was 0.31 ms. During this interval, Isi cumulative charge was 0.33 nC/cm2 in proximal segment X, only 0.7% of the total charge to the time of max in distal segment Y. In the normal action potentials of this study, Isi turn-on began at max, and during the next 5 ms the cumulative Isi charge was only 2.5 nC/cm2 (1.4% of total Isi). This result is consistent with that of Joyner et al,51 who found that drug effects on this current are limited to discontinuous conditions with conduction delays of 5 ms or greater.

Figure 7Up illustrates the percentage of total charge that the proximal segment, up to the time of its max, supplied to the distal segment. This percentage was greater in neonatal cells (44%) with their short cell-to-cell delays than in the adult cells (34%), which had longer delays. Thus, the smaller amount of current flowing to the next cell downstream before the time of max was consistent with the higher mean TP max values in adult than in neonatal cells.

Cell Size Versus Gap Junction Distribution
Numerical experiments in 4 cellular networks were devised to separate the effects of cell size from those of gap junction distribution. Two networks were the adult and neonatal 2D models (Figure 3BUp and 3CUp). To reverse the relationship between cell size and gap junction topology in these models, we created 2 hypothetical cellular networks, as follows: (1) a network that approximated the adult large cell geometry but with the neonatal gap junction distribution and gj values (Figure 8ADown, cell type b), and (2) another network that approximated the neonatal small cell geometry but with the adult gap junction distribution and gj values (Figure 8ADown, cell type c). These 4 networks represented the 4 possible combinations of differences in adult and neonatal cell size and gap junction topology. In each network, cell-to-cell conduction was analyzed in 15 cell pairs using the method illustrated in Figure 7Up.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Relation of cell-to-cell delays of action potential transfer, max, and percentage total charge to the distal segment in cellular networks that differ one from the other with respect to cell size and the distribution of the gap junctions. A, Mean values during TP in 4 networks that represent the 4 possible combinations of differences in adult and neonatal cell size and gap junction topology. Below each graph, the drawings of single cells represent each cellular network: a and d indicate adult and neonatal cellular networks, respectively, of Figure 3BUp and 3CUp; b, hypothetical network with adult cell size scaling but with neonatal gap junction distribution and gj values; and c, hypothetical network with neonatal cell size scaling but with adult gap junction distribution and gj values. B, Percentage total charge to the distal segment during LP and TP in adult and neonatal cellular networks. "To max: % tot. charge to distal segment" indicates the relative amount of the total charge of segment X that was supplied downstream to distal segment Y (up to the time of max in segment X) according to Equation 5Up. All data are mean±1 SD; *P<0.001.

All of the networks maintained very short mean TP cytoplasmic times (21 to 29 µs). Figure 8AUp shows the results for mean lateral cell-to-cell delay, mean TP max, and mean value of the percentage total charge supplied to the distal segment (Equation 5Up). Across the different networks, the mean cell-to-cell delay strongly correlated with mean TP max (r=0.99; P<0.01). Furthermore, the percentage of total charge supplied to the distal segment strongly correlated in an inverse manner with both mean TP max (r=-0.99; P<0.01) and the mean cell-to-cell delay (r=-0.98; P<0.01). Comparing cells a, b, c, and d, we saw that cell size had larger effects than gap junction distribution.

LP Versus TP
The electrotonic mechanism of cell-to-cell charge transfer illustrated in Figure 7Up for TP might also be involved in producing the effects on max of the delay of action potential transfer between cells during LP and TP (Figure 4Up). We therefore performed a similar analysis during LP of the "percentage of total charge supplied to the distal segment" in 15 pairs of adult and neonatal cells connected end-to-end in which segment X was located at the end of the proximal cell and distal segment Y was located just across the end-to-end junction in the next cell. Figure 8BUp shows that the mean values of the percentage of total charge supplied to the distal segment had the inverse pattern of the adult and neonatal LP-TP mean max values of Figures 1Up and 4AUp. That is, (1) there was no significant difference in the relatively high percentage total charge supplied to the distal segment during LP and TP in the neonatal cellular network, and (2) the percentage total charge supplied to the distal segment was significantly lower during TP than during LP (P<0.001) in the adult network.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowExperimental Procedures
up arrowBiophysical Mechanisms: Adult...
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Functional Importance of Cell Size
The major result of this study is the emergence of the unexpected importance of cell size in considering the anisotropic electrophysiological properties of adult and neonatal hearts. Initially, we attributed the different LP-TP mean max relationships in neonatal versus adult ventricular muscle (Figure 1Up) to the associated differences in the cellular distribution of gap junctions (Figure 2Up). The results of Figure 8Up, however, suggest that cell size may be more important, or at least as important, as gap junction distribution for explaining the different TP-LP max relationships in adult and neonatal myocardium. For example, in 2D models composed of small neonatal cells, a change from the neonatal diffuse cellular distribution of gap junctions to the adult gap junction pattern (maintaining the original gj values) produced little change during TP in max, lateral cell-to-cell delays, or the percentage of total charge an upstream segment supplied to a similar segment in the next cell downstream (Figure 8AUp). Similarly, reversal of the neonatal-adult gap junction distributions (maintaining the original gj values) in 2D networks of large adult cells produced little change in these parameters during TP. However, with either an adult or neonatal gap junction distribution, a shift from the neonatal small cell network to the adult large cell network produced large increases in each of these parameters during TP (Figure 8AUp). Because there was no significant difference in mean LP max in neonatal versus adult ventricular muscle, the results indicate that the role of cell size (cellular scaling) is important in explaining the anisotropic electrophysiological effects of changes in gap junction distribution.

It will be important to develop some idea of the relative importance of the individual contributions of cell size and intercellular coupling changes. As an initial test for changes in mean LP and TP max, we increased the resistance (rj) of each gap junction in steps up to 100% above the original values in the neonatal and adult 2D cellular models. The results showed a linear slope of change in LP and TP mean max, and the slopes of max change were considerably greater in the large adult cells than in the small neonatal cells. A 100% increase in rj produced an associated increase in TP mean max of 5 V/s in the neonatal model and 19 V/s in the adult model, whereas LP mean max increased minimally (1.5 V/s) in the neonatal model and 7 V/s in the adult model. Thus, from an experimental viewpoint, the same relative change in gap junction resistance induced by drugs could result in different interpretations about the effects on max of altering rj in tissues with large versus small cells.

The results reported here suggest the following general principles: as the degree of coupling between cells (number of connexons per unit area of sarcolemma) decreases in relation to the size of cells, conduction becomes more discontinuous. Conversely, for a given cell size, increase in the number of connexons along the sides (TP) or at the ends of the myocytes (LP), or a decrease in cell size for a given number of connexons, decreases the discontinuous nature of conduction (decreased mean cell-to-cell delay and decreased mean max).

Role of Intracellular Ion Channel Distribution in Adult Myocytes
Recent research has shown that localization of Kv1.5 K+ channel52 and Na+ channel53 proteins is increased adjacent to the gap junctions (intercalated disks) in adult cardiomyocytes. However, the Kv1.5 K+ channel is distributed evenly throughout neonatal cardiomyocytes52 (presumably neonatal cells also have a diffuse Na+ channel distribution). Because technological limitations prevent measurement of the effects of differences in intracellular ion channel distribution, we used the adult 2D cellular model to analyze these differences. We increased Na from 28 to 35 ms/cm2 in segments adjacent to gap junctions while decreasing Na throughout the remainder of each cell, thus having no change in total Na (number of Na+ channels) within each adult myocyte.

The results show that the fluctuating intracellular max values during LP and TP remained essentially the same as those of Figure 5Up (left). Even though Na was highest at the ends of each cell, the lowest max values remained at these sites, and each max maximum remained at the middle of each cell even though that area had the lowest Na value. We further tested the effect of redistributing the density of Na+ channels by increasing Na at the center of each cell while decreasing Na at the gap junctions (without changing total cellular Na). Again, the same adult LP and TP intracellular pattern of fluctuating max values occurred as shown in Figure 5Up. Neither of the 2 altered intracellular distributions of Na+ channels (Na) produced more than 0.8 V/s difference from the original mean LP max (164 V/s) and TP max (178 V/s) adult values of Figure 4AUp (n=564 sites), and the intracellular fluctuating max values strongly correlated across the three different Na distributions (r=0.95 to 0.99; P<0.001; n=564 sites) during LP and during TP. Furthermore, neither of the altered Na distributions produced a significant difference from the mean adult cell-to-cell delay values of Figure 4BUp during LP or TP. These preliminary results suggest that the electrical loading effects of the normal discrete cellular structure of cardiac muscle15 produce (1) intracellular variations in max that are not significantly altered by differences in the intracellular distribution of the Na+ channels and (2) differences in the intracellular distribution of Na+ channels do not significantly affect the cell-to-cell delay of impulse transfer.

Application to Pathological Remodeling of Gap Junctions
Because cellular scaling emerged as an important determinant of the delay of impulse transfer between cells and of mean max, the results have important implications for pathological remodeling of the gap junctions. For example, there is "reappearance" of diffusely distributed gap junctions (connexin43) along the side of cells after ventricular infarction.6 7 Peters and Wit54 showed this type of gap junction remodeling to occur in the infarct border zone that involves reentrant circuits. In addition, Yao et al.55 demonstrated reduced electrical coupling between cell pairs from the border zone. However, the influence of cell size on the electrophysiological responses that occur in response to pathological remodeling of the gap junctions is unknown. Our results suggest that maintaining the size of mature cells during pathological remodeling of gap junctions plays an important role in sustaining max at a maximum level for a given state of the Na+ current.56 Thus, investigation of the effects of cellular scaling is an important area for future studies. Such studies may be especially important in evaluating the magnitude of electrophysiological responses of small versus large hearts in the application of molecular genetic strategies to alter gap junction–mediated intercellular communication.57


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the NIH (Grant HL 50537) and The North Carolina Supercomputing Center.

Received September 16, 1999; accepted November 22, 1999.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowExperimental Procedures
up arrowBiophysical Mechanisms: Adult...
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Spooner PM, Joyner RW, Jalife J, eds. Discontinuous Conduction in the Heart. Armonk, NY: Futura Publishing Co Inc; 1997.
  2. Gourdie RG, Green CR, Severs NJ, Thompson RP. Immunolabeling patterns of gap junction connexins in the developing and mature rat heart. Anat Embryol. 1992;185:363–378.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Peters NS, Severs NJ, Rothery SM, Lincoln C, Yacoub MH, Green CR. Spatiotemporal relationship between gap junctions and fascia adherens junctions during postnatal development of human ventricular myocardium. Circulation. 1994;90:713–725.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Angst BD, Khan LUR, Severs NJ, Whitely K, Rothery S, Thompson RP, Magee AI, Gourdie RG. Dissociated spatial patterning of gap junctions and cell adhesion junctions during postnatal differentiation of ventricular myocardium. Circ Res. 1997;80:88–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Spach MS, Dolber PC. Relating extracellular potentials and their derivatives to anisotropic propagation at a microscopic level in human cardiac muscle: evidence for electrical uncoupling of side-to-side fiber connections with increasing age. Circ Res. 1986;58:356–371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Luke RA, Saffitz JE. Remodeling of ventricular conduction pathways in healed canine infarct border zones. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:1594–1602.
  7. Smith JH, Green CR, Peters NS, Rothery S, Severs NJ. Altered patterns of gap junction distribution in ischemic heart disease: An immunohistochemical study of human myocardium using laser scanning confocal microscopy. Am J Pathol. 1991;139:801–821.[Abstract]
  8. Peters NS, Green CR, Poole-Wilson PA, Severs NJ. Reduced content of connexin43 gap junctions in ventricular myocardium from hypertrophied and ischemic human hearts. Circulation. 1993;88:864–875.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Severs NJ. Pathophysiology of gap junctions in heart disease. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1994;5:462–475.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Gourdie RG, Litchenberg WH, Eisenberg LM. Gap junctions and heart development. In: De Mello WC, Janse MJ, eds. Heart Cell Communication in Health and Disease. Norwell, Mass: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group; 1998:19–43.
  11. Spach MS, Heidlage JF, Dolber PC, Barr RC. Extracellular discontinuities in cardiac muscle: evidence for capillary effects on the action potential foot. Circ Res. 1998;83:1144–1164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Schmidt-Nielsen K. Scaling in biology: the consequences of size. J Exp Zool. 1975;194:287–308.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Spach MS, Miller WT III, Geselowitz DB, Barr RC, Kootsey JM, Johnson EA. The discontinuous nature of propagation in normal canine cardiac muscle: evidence for recurrent discontinuities of intracellular resistance that affect the membrane currents. Circ Res. 1981;48:39–54.[Free Full Text]
  14. Fast VG, Kléber AG. Anisotropic conduction in monolayers of neonatal rat heart cells cultured on collagen substrate. Circ Res. 1994;75:591–595.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Spach MS, Heidlage JF. The stochastic nature of cardiac propagation at a microscopic level: an electrical description of myocardial architecture and its application to conduction. Circ Res. 1995;76:366–380.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Spach MS. Anisotropy of cardiac tissue: a major determinant of conduction? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999;10:887–890.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Beeler GW, Reuter H. Reconstruction of the action potential of ventricular myocardial fibers. J Physiol (Lond). 1977;268:177–210.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ebihara L, Johnson EA. Fast sodium current in cardiac muscle: a quantitative description. Biophys J. 1980;32:779–790.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Luo CH, Rudy Y. A model of the ventricular action potential: depolarization, repolarization, and their interaction. Circ Res. 1991;68:1501–1526.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Luo CH, Rudy Y. A dynamic model of the cardiac ventricular action potential, I: simulations of ionic currents and concentration changes. Circ Res. 1994;74:1071–1096.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Nygren A, Fiset C, Firek L, Clark JW, Lindblad DS, Giles WR. Mathematical model of an adult human atrial cell: the role of K+ currents in repolarization. Circ Res. 1998;82:63–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Winslow RL, Rice J, Jafri S, Marbán E, O’Rourke B. Mechanisms of altered excitation-contraction coupling in canine tachycardia-induced heart failure, II: model studies. Circ Res. 1999;84:571–586.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Spach MS, Heidlage JF. A multidimensional model of cellular effects on the spread of electrotonic currents and on propagating action potentials. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1992;20:141–169.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Dolber PC, Beyer EC, Junker JL, Spach MS. Distribution of gap junctions in dog and rat ventricle studied with a double-label technique. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1992;24:1443–1457.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Jacobson SL. Culture of spontaneously contracting myocardial cells from adult rats. Cell Struct Funct. 1977;2:1–9.
  26. Gerdes AM, Kreseman J, Bishop SP. Morphometric study of cardiac muscle: the problem of tissue shrinkage. Lab Invest. 1982;46:271–274.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Allen RD, David GB, Nomarski G. The Zeiss-Normarski differential interference equipment for transmitted light microscopy. Z wiss Mikrosk. 1969;69:193–221.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Hoyt RH, Cohen ML, Saffitz JE. Distribution and three-dimensional structure of intercellular junctions in canine myocardium. Circ Res. 1989;64:563–574.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Fast VG, Darrow BJ, Saffitz JE, Kléber AG. Anisotropic activation spread in heart cell monolayers assessed by high-resolution optical mapping: role of tissue discontinuities. Circ Res. 1996;79:115–127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Bishop SP, Drummond JL. Surface morphology and cell size measurement of isolated rat cardiac myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1979;11:423–433.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Bishop SP, Hine P. Cardiac muscle cytoplasmic and nuclear development during canine neonatal growth. In: Roy P-E, Harris P, eds. The Cardiac Sarcoplasm. Baltimore,