Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2000;86:e42-e49

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Valiunas, V.
Right arrow Articles by Brink, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Valiunas, V.
Right arrow Articles by Brink, P. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Ion channels/membrane transport
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
(Circulation Research. 2000;86:e42.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


UltraRapid Communications

Formation of Heterotypic Gap Junction Channels by Connexins 40 and 43

Virginijus Valiunas, Robert Weingart, Peter R. Brink

From the Department of Physiology and Biophysics (V.V., P.R.B.), State University of New York at Stony Brook, NY; Department of Physiology (R.W.), University of Bern, Switzerland.

Correspondence to Peter R. Brink, Department of Physiology and Biophysics, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794. E-mail peter{at}patch.pnb.sunysb.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—Gap junctions formed between transfected cells expressing connexin (Cx) 40 and Cx43 (Cx43-RIN, Cx40-HeLa, and Cx43-HeLa) revealed a relationship, gj=f(Vj), at steady state, that is typified by a nonsymmetrical behavior similar to that previously reported for other heterotypic channels (gap junction conductance [gj]; transjunctional voltage [Vj]). The unitary conductance of the channels was sensitive to the polarity of Vj. A main state conductance of 61 pS was found when the Cx43 cell was stepped positively or the Cx40 cell negatively (Vj=70 mV); the reverse polarities yielded a conductance of 100 pS. These heterotypic channels were permeable to carboxyfluorescein. In addition, two other heterotypic forms are illustrated to demonstrate that endogenous Cx45 expression cannot explain the results. The demonstration of heterotypic Cx40–Cx43 channels may have implications for the propagation of the electrical impulse in heart. For example, they may contribute to the slowing of the impulse propagation through the junctions between Purkinje fibers and ventricular muscle. The full text of this article is available at http://www.circresaha.org.


Key Words: gap junction • ion channel • electrophysiology


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Coexpression of connexins (Cx) has been demonstrated in a number of tissues including vascular smooth muscle1 and myocardium.2 For example, Cx43 and Cx40 are present in the sinoatrial (SA)-node of dogs and guinea pigs3 4 5 or Cx43, Cx40, and Cx45 in the atrioventricular (AV)-node of humans, rats, and guinea pigs.6 7 8 This finding immediately raises the question about the types of gap junction channels present. In principle, three types of channels can be constituted, ie, homotypic, heterotypic, and heteromeric channels.

Homotypic gap junction channels are defined to consist of two identical hemichannels made from one type of connexin. Such channels have been studied extensively under in vitro conditions (eg, see References 99 –11). Heteromeric channels are defined to consist of two hemichannels composed of more than one type of connexin. However, the existence of such channels in situ is still controversial. Some authors concluded from in vitro and in vivo studies that heteromeric channels exist, exhibiting properties not profoundly different from those of their homotypic counterparts12 13 14 (but see also References 1515 ). Other authors concluded from in vitro studies that there is no unambiguous functional evidence for the presence of heteromeric channels.16 Heterotypic channels consist of two different hemichannels, each of which is made of a different type of connexin. Such channels were demonstrated unequivocally in vitro.12 16 17 18 19 20 However, not every homomeric hemichannel will form a functional gap junction channel with another homomeric hemichannel derived from a different connexin.21

A number of investigators have reported that Cx40 and Cx43 are unable to form functional heterotypic channels between injected oocytes20 22 and transfected HeLa cells.23 This finding was explained as being the result of low levels of connexin expression and/or structural incompatibility between the extracellular loops E1 and E2 of Cx43 and Cx40.23 There are several reasons that heterotypic Cx40–Cx43 channels may exist. One argument relies on functional evidence. Examining isolated myocytes from adult rat hearts, two authors of the present study have recently obtained electrophysiological data indicative of heterotypic Cx40–Cx43 channels (L. Polonchuk, V.V., J.A. Haefliger, H. Eppenberger, R.W., unpublished data, 1998). Another argument is based on structural similarities. A comparison of the amino acid residues of Cx40 and Cx43 indicates that 80% of E1 and 53% of E2 are conserved. A similar degree of homology exists between Cx37 and Cx43, ie, 83% and 55% for E1 and E2, respectively, two candidates that have been shown to establish heterotypic channels between oocytes21 22 and transfected N2a cells.12

The aim of the present study has been to investigate the possible formation of heterotypic gap junction channels between Cx40 and Cx43. For this purpose, we have used HeLa cells transfected with either Cx40 or Cx43 and RIN cells transfected with Cx43. The transfectants were cocultured (Cx43-RIN cells and Cx40-HeLa cells; Cx40-HeLa cells and Cx43-HeLa cells), and the putative formation of heterotypic channels was assessed using a dual-voltage clamp method. In contrast to previous studies, the analysis of multichannel currents as well as single-channel currents revealed properties consistent with the presence of heterotypic Cx40–Cx43 channels.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cells and Culture Conditions
Experiments were carried out on human HeLa cells transfected with cDNA coding for mouse Cx40, Cx43, and Cx45 and rat islet tumor (RIN) cells transfected with cDNA coding for rat Cx43 and chicken Cx45 DNA. HeLa cells and RIN cells were grown in DMEM and RPMI 1640 medium, respectively, supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and 100 U/mL penicillin. The media also contained 0.4 mg/mL G418 (Geneticin, Life Technologies). The cells were passaged weekly, diluted 1:10, and kept at 37°C in a CO2 incubator (5% CO2/95% ambient air). For later identification, some cultures were previously tagged with cell tracker green (5-chloromethyl-fluorescein diacetate; Molecular Probes).12 Tagged cells expressing one type of connexin and nontagged cells expressing the other type of connexin were mixed and seeded onto sterile glass coverslips placed in multiwell culture dishes ({approx}104 cells/cm2). Electrophysiological measurements were carried out on cells cultured for 1 to 3 days.

Solutions
During experiments, the cells were superfused with bath solution containing (in mmol/L) CsCl 110, KCl 5, CaCl2 2, MgCl2 1, and HEPES 10 (pH 7.4). The patch pipettes were filled with saline containing (in mmol/L) CsCl 110, MgCl2 0.1, CaCl2 0.1, EGTA 3, and HEPES 10 (pH 7.2).

Electrical Measurements
Glass coverslips with adherent cells were transferred to an experimental chamber perfused with bath solution at room temperature (21°C to 23°C). The chamber was mounted on the stage of an inverted microscope (Olympus IMT2). Patch pipettes were pulled from glass capillaries (code 7052; A-M Systems) with a horizontal puller (Sutter lnstruments). When filled, the resistance of the pipettes measured 1 to 3 M{Omega}. Experiments were carried out on mixed cell pairs. A dual-voltage clamp method and whole-cell recording were used to control the membrane potential of both cells and to measure currents.9 10 Each cell was attached to a patch pipette connected to a separate micromanipulator (WR-88; Narishige Scientific Instrument) and amplifier (Axopatch 200). Initially, the membrane potential of cell 1 and cell 2 was clamped to the same value, V1=V2. V2 was then changed to establish a transjunctional voltage, Vj=V2-V1. Currents recorded from cell 2 represent the sum of two components, the junctional current, Ij, and the membrane current of cell 2, Im, 2; the current obtained from cell 1 corresponds to Ij. To measure Ij, both cells were held at the same holding potential, ie, Vh=0 mV. The voltage of one of the cells was then stepped to different levels.

Signal Recording and Analysis
Voltage and current signals were recorded on chart paper (Gould RS 2400; Gould Instruments) and videotape (Neurocorder DR-384; Neuro Data Instruments). For offline analysis, the current signals were filtered at 1 kHz (low-pass filter), digitized with a 12-bit A/D converter (DT21EZ, Data Translation), and stored with a personal computer. Data acquisition and analysis were performed with custom-made software.10 24 Curve-fitting and statistical analysis were done with SigmaPlot and SigmaStat, respectively (Jandel Scientific). The data are presented as mean values ±1 SEM.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The formation of homotypic channels consisting of Cx40 or Cx43 has been demonstrated in several studies examining cells in primary culture11 and transfected cells.9 10 25 26 For illustration, Figures 1ADown and 1BDown show records from a pair of transfected Cx40-HeLa cells and a pair of transfected Cx43-RIN cells, respectively. Starting from a Vh of 0 mV, bipolar pulses of 800 ms in duration were administered to establish Vj gradients of identical amplitude and either polarity. Vj was then altered from ±10 to ±110 mV using increments of 20 mV. The associated currents Ij increased proportional with Vj and showed a voltage- and time-dependent inactivation. The amplitudes of Ij were determined at the beginning (Ij, inst;inst: instantaneous) and end of each pulse (Ij, ss; ss: steady state) to estimate the conductances gj, inst and gj, ss, respectively. The values of gj, ss were normalized with respect to gj, inst and plotted versus Vj. As shown in Figure 1CDown, this resulted in a symmetrical relationship for both types of cell pairs (•: Cx40-HeLa cells; {circ}: Cx43-RIN cells). The analysis revealed the following Boltzmann parameters: Cx40 (continuous curve): Vj,0=56 mV, gj, min=0.18, z=2.1; Cx43: Vj,0=66 mV, gj, min=0.23, z=2.3 (dashed curve). These findings are consistent with previous reports on Cx409 26 and Cx43 gap junctions.10 11 25



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Dependence of intercellular coupling on transjunctional voltage (Vj) for homotypic gap junctions. A and B, Responses of gap junction currents (Ij) to Vj gained from a pair of Cx43-RIN cells and Cx40-HeLa cells, respectively. Currents were elicited by a bipolar pulse protocol, beginning at Vj=±10 mV, continuing with 20-mV increments. Holding potential Vh=0 mV. C, Plot of normalized gj at steady state versus Vj. •, Cx40-HeLa cell pair; {circ}, Cx43-RIN cell pair. The continuous and dashed curves represent the best fit of data to the Boltzmann equation for Cx40 (Vj,0=56 mV, gj, min=0.18, z=2.1) and Cx43 (Vj,0=66 mV, gj, min=0.23, z=2.3), respectively.

In the case of pairs of Cx40-HeLa cells, the single-channel conductances of the main state and residual state, {gamma}j, main and {gamma}j, residual, determined in preparations with one operational channel, turned out to be 135 and 26 pS, respectively (data not shown). In the case of pairs of Cx43-RIN cells, these conductances averaged 76 and 18 pS (data not shown). These values are consistent with previous reports on Cx409 26 and Cx43 channels.10 11 25

To examine whether heterotypic Cx40–Cx43 channels are formed, Cx40-HeLa cells were cocultured with Cx43-RIN or Cx43-HeLa cells (see Materials and Methods). Dual whole-cell voltage-clamp experiments were performed on cell pairs with one cell stained with cell tracker and the other devoid of it. Of 23 cell pairs examined, 20 exhibited functional coupling at the macroscopic or microscopic current level, whereas 3 showed no coupling. In the case of Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN preparations, gj averaged 3.8±1.6 nS (n=12); in the case of Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-HeLa preparations, gj averaged 6.8±2.9 nS (n=8).

To further explore the properties of Ij in mixed cell pairs, the bipolar pulse protocol (see Figures 1AUp and 1BUp) was used to alter Vj from ±10 to ±150 mV and generate a family of currents. Figure 2ADown illustrates an experiment with a Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN preparation. Inspection of the current signals indicated that the size and time course of Ij are not only sensitive to the amplitude of Vj but also to its polarity. This means Ij was asymmetrical at each Vj. Specifically, stepping Vj to make the inside of the Cx43-RIN cell negative or the inside of the Cx40-HeLa cell positive resulted in a large Ij, inst with pronounced inactivation. Conversely, stepping Vj to make the inside of the Cx43-RIN cell positive or the inside of the Cx40-HeLa cell negative led to a small Ij, inst with marginal or no inactivation. Consistent with these findings, inversion of the Vj polarity during bipolar pulses revealed that Ij recovery is faster in the former case. Experiments performed on Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-HeLa preparations (data not shown) yielded Ij patterns comparable to those seen in Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN cell pairs.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Multichannel properties of heterotypic Cx40–Cx43 gap junctions. A, Responses of gap junction currents (Ij) to Vj using a bipolar pulse protocol, starting at Vj=±10 mV and continuing with 20-mV increments (Vh=0 mV). Pulses were applied to the Cx43-RIN cell. Currents were measured from the Cx40-HeLa cell. B, Top left, Epifluorescent micrograph of a Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-HeLa cell pair before dye injection. Cx40-HeLa cells were tagged with cell tracker green to distinguish from Cx43-HeLa cells. Top right, Phase-contrast micrograph of a Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-HeLa cell pair. The patch pipette, filled with pipette solution containing 2 mmol/L 5- (and 6-) carboxyfluorescein, was attached to the Cx40-HeLa cell. Bottom, Epifluorescent micrograph taken after 20 minutes, showing dye transfer from the Cx40-HeLa cell to the Cx43-HeLa cell. C and D, Summary plots of normalized gj versus Vj for Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN cell pairs and Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-HeLa cell pairs, respectively. The instantaneous plots ({circ}) and steady-state plots (•) show rectification. The latter exhibit pronounced Vj dependence gating when the Cx43-HeLa cell is negative and virtually no gating when it is positive. Continuous curves indicate fitted Boltzmann equations (C: Vj,0=-82 mV, gj, min=0.31, gj, max=1.03, z=1.9, n=10; D: Vj,0=-89 mV, gj, min=0.33, gj, max=0.98, z=1.7, n=6).

Figures 2CUp and 2DUp summarize the data gathered from Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN (n=10) and Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-HeLa preparations (n=6). They show the normalized relationships gj, inst versus f(Vj) ({circ}) and gj, ss versus f(Vj) (•). Both plots were strongly asymmetrical. The instantaneous gj increased when the cell expressing Cx43 was made negative inside and decreased when it was made positive. The increase in gj, inst peaked at {approx}1.15 between Vj=-100 and -150 mV. The decrease in gj, inst reached a value of {approx}0.7 at Vj=150 mV. In contrast, the steady-state gj declined when the Cx43 cell was made negative or positive. In the former case, it decreased in a sigmoidal fashion to a quasi stable level at a Vj of {approx}150 mV. In the latter case, it decreased gradually without reaching a plateau, ie, it followed nearly Ij, inst. The continuous curves at negative values of Vj represent the best fit of data to the Boltzmann equation using the following parameters: Figure 2CUp: Vj,0=-82 mV, gj, min=0.31, gj, max=1.03, z=1.86; Figure 2DUp: Vj,0=-89 mV, gj, min=0.33, gj, max=0.98, z=1.67. When compared with the respective homotypic channels (see Figure 1CUp), the heterotypic channels exhibit a more negative Vj,0 and a broader voltage sensitivity. This is consistent with previous reports on heterotypic Cx26–Cx3216 17 18 and Cx37–Cx43 channels.12

Diffusion experiments on Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN cell pairs indicated that Cx40–Cx43 channels are permeable to 5- (and 6-) carboxyfluorescein (Molecular Probes), the fluorescent anionic dyes (Figure 2BUp).

Figure 3Down illustrates experiments designed to study the Vj sensitivity of single heterotypic channels. Figure 3ADown shows records of a Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN cell pair whose gap junction contained a single operational channel. Biphasic pulses were applied to cell 1 (V1; Cx43-RIN cell) while gap junction currents were recorded from cell 2 (I2; Cx40-HeLa cell). As illustrated for Vj=±70, ±90, and ±110 mV, I2 showed three discrete levels corresponding to the closed state (continuous lines), main state, and residual state (dashed lines). The analysis indicated that the unitary currents are smaller when cell 1 is depolarized (positive Vj) than when it is hyperpolarized (negative Vj). Moreover, residual currents were preferentially seen in the latter case, ie, voltage gating was virtually absent at positive Vj. The observed single channel conductances were {gamma}j, main=60/100 pS (positive/negative Vj); {gamma}j, residual=14 to 20 pS (negative Vj).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Single-channel properties of heterotypic gap junctions. A, Recordings from a Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN cell pair with one operational channel. Inversion of Vj polarity (V1=±70 mV, ±90 mV, ±110 mV; V2=0 mV) and associated channel currents (I2) recorded from the Cx40-HeLa cell. Continuous lines in I2 indicate zero current; dashed lines, residual current. Depolarization of Cx43-RIN cell: {gamma}j, main=61 pS, {gamma}j, residual=14 pS; hyperpolarization: {gamma}j, main=98 pS, {gamma}j, residual=14 to 20 pS. B, Recordings from a Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN cell pair with {approx}10 channels. Voltage ramp protocol (±50 mV, ramp duration 200 ms) applied to Cx40-HeLa cell evoked rectifying gap junction currents (I2). Dashed lines indicate ohmic I/V relationship. C, Plots of single-channel conductances {gamma}j, main (•) and {gamma}j, residual ({blacktriangledown}) versus Vj. Negative Vj: Cx43 cell inside negative (n=7). D, I-V relationships of Cx40–Cx43 gap junctions at the single channel (•, Ij, main; {blacktriangledown}, Ij, residual; replotted from Figure 3CUp) and multichannel level ({circ}, Ij, inst; replotted from Figure 2CUp). Negative Vj: Cx43 cell inside negative.

Figure 3BUp shows an experiment carried out on a Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN cell pair whose gap junction consisted of several operational channels. This time a bipolar voltage-ramp protocol was used to alter Vj from -50 to 50 mV and back to -50 mV again. The ramps evolved at a rate of 100 mV/200 ms (see V1 and V2). The associated junctional current changed linearly with time with a distinct break {approx}Vj=0 mV (I2). The dashed lines were aligned to the shallower segments and correspond to a slope conductance of 0.64 nS, indicating the involvement of at least 10 channels. The steeper segment yielded a slope conductance of {approx}1 nS. Conceivably, the break in slope reflects the Vj sensitivity of the channels. An involvement of channel inactivation seems unlikely because of the short duration of the ramp and the small amplitude of Vj.

Figure 3CUp summarizes the combined results from the Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN cell pairs (n=7). The plot {gamma}j, main=f(Vj) (•) demonstrates that over the voltage range examined, ie, ±150 mV, the channels exhibit a strong dependence on Vj polarity and a weak dependence on Vj amplitude. Because of limitations of resolution, it was not possible to gain reliable data for Vj<||30||mV. The plot {gamma}j, residual=f(Vj) ({blacktriangledown}) indicates that the channels also exhibit a weak dependence on ||Vj||.

Figure 3DUp compares the I-V relationships of the single-channel data documented in Figure 3CUp and the multichannel data presented in Figure 2CUp. The currents Ij, inst (•) and Ij, main (•) were normalized with respect to the values at Vj=-150 mV, averaged, and plotted versus Vj, respectively. The currents Ij, residual ({blacktriangledown}) were scaled to account for the normalization of the Ij, main values, averaged, and plotted versus Vj. The analysis yielded the following slopes for the relationships Ij(normalized)=f(Vj): multichannel currents: -3.93x10-3/-6.85x10-3 mV-1 (r2=0.98/0.99) for positive/negative Vj; single-channel currents, main state: -3.90x10-3/-6.74x10-3 mV-1 (r2=0.99/0.99); residual state: -8.99x10-4/-7.23x10-4 mV-1 (r2=0.83/0.98).

Involvement of Intrinsic Connexins. The possible contribution of endogenous coupling in the mixed-cell pairs was explored by studying a number of relevant combinations of HeLa and RIN cells. For this purpose, small test pulses (10 mV, 70 ms) were administered to one cell of a pair to determine gj without interference from voltage and time dependence. The TableDown summarizes the results gathered from the different types of cell pairs. A comparison of the gj data indicates that both HeLa cells and RIN cells express a marginal level of intrinsic connexins. Pairs consisting of identical parental cells (HeLa–HeLa and RIN–RIN) yielded a weak coupling (0.04 and 0.13 nS) or no coupling at all (90% and 83%). Similarly, mixed pairs containing one transfectant (Cx43-RIN–HeLa, Cx43-HeLa–HeLa, and Cx40-HeLa–HeLa) also showed weak coupling (not detectable, not detectable, and 0.04 nS, respectively) or no coupling (100%, 100%, and 87%, respectively). In contrast, mixed pairs consisting of two transfectants (Cx40HeLa–Cx43-RIN, Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-HeLa) yielded significant coupling (3.8 and 6.8 nS, respectively) and few coupling failures (0% and 20%, respectively). Hence, these pairs exhibit a 170- and 190-fold or larger gj than the respective control pairs (Cx40HeLa–Cx43-RIN versus Cx40-HeLa–RIN and Cx43-RIN–HeLa; Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-HeLa versus Cx40-HeLa–HeLa and Cx43-HeLa–HeLa). This suggests that coupling in pairs of transfected cells occurs by exogenous rather than endogenous connexins. The gj data for homotypic pairs of Cx40-HeLa, Cx43-HeLa, and Cx43-RIN cells in the TableDown are comparable to those previously reported for these cell lines.9 23 27 Transfection increased the intercellular coupling at least 100-fold.27


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Electrophysiological Data Obtained From Different Types of Cell Pairs

The TableUp also summarizes the unitary conductances determined from these experiments. Pairs of parental cells showed a value of 40 to 50 and 30 pS (HeLa–HeLa and RIN–RIN), respectively. This is in agreement with Cx45–Cx45 channels in HeLa cells.28 29 Pairs of Cx43-RIN cells and Cx43-HeLa cells yielded a value of 76 and 72 pS, respectively, indicative of Cx43–Cx43 channels,10 11 25 whereas pairs of Cx40-HeLa gave a value of 135 pS, comparable with Cx40–Cx40 channels.9 26 Pairs of Cx40-HeLa–HeLa or Cx40-HeLa–RIN might be expected to form Cx40–Cx45 channels. A few unitary conductance values yielded 30 to 40 and 20 pS, which are not consistent with the Cx40–Cx43 heterotypic channel in the present study. The unitary conductances quoted for the pairs Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN and Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-HeLa refer to the values prevailing at Vj=±70 mV. They were taken from the experiments already described in Figure 3Up. Finally, when examining Cx40 and Cx43 transfectants, we rarely noticed signs of endogenous channels (see also Reference 99 ). Conceivably, they may even be suppressed after transfection from a functional point of view.

The bipolar pulse protocol was then used to study multichannel currents from a Cx43-HeLa–Cx45-HeLa cell pair (Figure 4ADown) and a Cx40-HeLa–Cx45-HeLa cell pair (Figure 4BDown). In the former case, the stepping Vj to make the inside of the Cx45-HeLa cell negative or the inside of the Cx43-HeLa cell positive resulted in an Ij, inst with pronounced inactivation. Conversely, stepping Vj to make the inside of the Cx45-HeLa cell positive and the inside of the Cx43-RIN cell negative led to an Ij, inst with distinct activation. In the latter case, the current signals revealed a similar picture, ie, Ij inactivated when the inside of the Cx45-HeLa cell was made negative or the inside of the Cx40-HeLa was made positive.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Multichannel properties of heterotypic Cx43–Cx45 and Cx40–Cx45 gap junctions. A and B, Responses of gap junction currents (Ij) to Vj using a bipolar pulse protocol, beginning at Vh=0 mV. Pulses were applied to the Cx45-HeLa cell. Currents were measured from the Cx43-HeLa cell and Cx40-HeLa cell, respectively. C and D, Instantaneous ({circ}) and steady-state plots (•) of normalized gj versus Vj of a Cx43-HeLa–Cx45-HeLa cell pair and a Cx40-HeLa–Cx45HeLa cell pair, respectively. The steady-state gj exhibits pronounced voltage gating when the Cx45-HeLa cell is negative and virtually no gating or reopening when it is positive. Continuous curves indicate fitted Boltzmann equations (C: Vj,0=50 mV, gj, min=0.05, gj, max=1.03, z=2.3; D: Vj,0=50 mV, gj, min=0.06, gj, max=1.05, z=3.3).

Figures 4CUp and 4DUp show the analysis of the current records depicted in Figures 4AUp and 4BUp. They represent the normalized relationships gj, inst versus Vj ({circ}) and gj, ss versus Vj (•). Both plots were strongly asymmetrical. In the case of Cx43-HeLa–Cx45-HeLa (Figure 4CUp), the instantaneous gj decrease was more pronounced when the cells expressing Cx45 were made negative. In the case of Cx40-HeLa–Cx45-HeLa (Figure 4DUp), the instantaneous gj decreased when Cx45 cells were made positive. In contrast, the steady-state gj increased when the cell expressing Cx45 was made positive inside and decreased when it was made negative. Note that gj was far from steady state at the end of the 400-ms pulse applied (see Figures 4AUp and 4BUp).

When compared with Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN (see Figures 2AUp and 2CUp) and Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-HeLa cell pairs (see Figure 2DUp), the currents and conductances of Cx43-HeLa–Cx45-HeLa (Figures 4AUp and 4CUp) and Cx40-HeLa–Cx45-HeLa cell pairs (see Figures 4BUp and 4DUp) behave differently. They deviate with regard to Vj dependence, gating polarity, current patterns, kinetics of inactivation, and the presence or absence of activation of Ij. This suggests that Cx43–Cx45 and Cx40–Cx45 channels are likely not to be involved in the Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN and Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-HeLa cell pairs.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Our experiments indicate that the incidence of electrical coupling in parental HeLa cells and RIN cells is low. After transfection with Cx40 or Cx43, coupling was enhanced {approx}200-fold in Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-HeLa and Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN cell pairs. This suggests formation of heterotypic Cx40–Cx43 channels.

The multichannel and single-channel data presented indicate that Cx40–Cx43 channels are present in Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-HeLa and Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN cell pairs. With regard to multichannel data, the relationships gj, inst=f(Vj) and gj, ss=f(Vj) were asymmetrical, a property seen in heterotypic gap junctions whose connexons exhibit widely different properties (eg, Cx26–Cx3216 17 18 or Cx37–Cx43.12 21 In the case of Cx40–Cx43, rectification was prominent for both relationships, ie, gj, ss=f(Vj) and gj, inst=f(Vj) (see Figures 2CUp and 2DUp). Voltage gating was almost exclusively observed at negative Vj. This is consistent with the notion that Cx40 is gating with positive polarity (V.V., R.W., P.R.B., unpublished observations, 1999) and Cx43 with negative polarity.30 With regard to single-channel data, the function {gamma}j, main=f(Vj) was characterized by two phenomena, a strong dependence on Vj polarity and a weak dependence on Vj amplitude (see Figure 3CUp). Although the latter has been anticipated on theoretical grounds, the former is not.31 Because of limited resolution, values of gj, main (and gj, residual) could not be determined accurately for Vj<||30||mV. Hence, the function gj, main=f(Vj) remains undefined over this voltage range. It may undergo an abrupt change at Vj=0 mV or a gradual change over a narrow range of Vj values, ie, from -30 to 30 mV. The function {gamma}j, residual=f(Vj) showed a distinct voltage dependence for either Vj polarity.

Significant interference from endogenous connexins is unlikely because of the low level of expression. This conclusion is based on several observations. For example, coupling between parental cells and between Cx40 or Cx43 transfectants and parental cells is rudimentary or absent (see TableUp). Moreover, the incidence of single-channel currents attributable to intrinsic connexins is extremely low in pairs of transfectants. Furthermore, pairs of Cx45-HeLa cells with Cx40-HeLa or Cx43-HeLa (Cx43-RIN) cells yielded asymmetrical relationships gj=f(Vj) distinctly different from those seen in Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-HeLa or Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN cell pairs (compare Figures 2Up and 4Up). Most striking is the change in Vj polarity responsible for channel gating. Such properties were not detectable in our data from Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-HeLa or Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN cell pairs (compare Figures 2Up and 4Up). This suggests that intrinsic connexins are expressed at a low level of expression. Finally, the properties of single channels seen between parental cells and between Cx40 or Cx43 transfectants and parental cells are different from those observed in Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-HeLa or Cx40-HeLa–Cx43-RIN cell pairs (see TableUp).

What are the mechanisms underlying rectification of gj, inst and gj, ss observed for Cx40–Cx43 gap junctions and gap junction channels? On the one hand, gj, ss reflects the properties of voltage-sensitive gating of the channels. Hence, rectification of gj, ss can be explained by the opposite gating polarity of Cx40 and Cx43 (see above). On the other hand, gj, inst reflects the properties of {gamma}j, main. Hence, rectification of gj, inst can be explained by the properties of hemichannels arranged in series. It has been shown that the symmetrical functions gj=f(Vj) of a homotypic gap junction require two hemichannels with an identical nonlinear I/V relationship.31 Compared with this, two hemichannels with different properties led to the asymmetrical functions characteristic of heterotypic gap junctions. This suggests that the hemichannel functions {gamma}hc, main=f(Vm) of Cx40 and Cx43 arranged in series determine the properties of {gamma}j, main=f(Vj).

Rectification of {gamma}j, main (and {gamma}j, residual) may be caused by interactions between ionic charge carriers and channel structures. Alternatively, it may reflect alterations of the effective channel geometry caused by the electric field. Another possibility is that the channels exhibit rapid gating beyond the time resolution of the data recording (1 to 2 ms). Yet another possibility is partial channel block. However, the data in Figure 3CUp argue against this because the block did not increase with increasing Vj.

The heart is a prominent organ whose tissues coexpress Cx40, Cx43, and Cx45.32 33 During maturation, mouse hearts show overlapping (left ventricle) and complementary (atrium) expression of Cx40, Cx43, and Cx45.32 33 34 In adult hearts, Cx40 and Cx43 are distributed unequally: SA-node: Cx40>>Cx43; atrium: Cx40>Cx43; AV-node: Cx43>Cx40 (however, Cx45 is the major connexin); Purkinje fiber: Cx40>>Cx43; and ventricle: Cx43>>Cx40. Cx45 distribution is controversial. Coppen et al32 have demonstrated prevalent Cx45 expression in conduction tissues whereas Alcolea et al33 have presented data that indicate a downregulation of Cx45 throughout the pacemaker-conducting system such that the distribution appears to be slight in adult heart. Hence, prominent regions with coexpression of Cx40 and Cx43, and possibly Cx45, include junctional interphases in tissues such as Purkinje fibers and ventricular muscle or atrial muscle and AV-node as well as specialized tissues (ie, atrium, AV-node). Thus the properties of Cx40–Cx43, Cx45–Cx40, and/or Cx45–Cx43 heterotypic channels may lead to the following phenomena. At junctional interphases between specialized tissues, rectification of Cx40–Cx43 channels is expected to facilitate intercellular current flow when the Cx40 cell is depolarized and to impair it when the Cx43 cell is depolarized. Similarly, for the Cx40–Cx45 channel, depolarization of the Cx40 cell will facilitate current flow whereas depolarization of the Cx45 cell will impair current flow. Hence, for these two cases, propagation of action potentials will be accelerated orthodromically and decelerated antidromically. For the Cx43–Cx45 case when the Cx45 cell is depolarized, intercellular current flow is facilitated whereas depolarization of the Cx43 cell will impair current flow. Any one of these combinations could result in enhanced or impaired action potential propagation from conducting to working myocardium, depending on the connexin distribution and amount within the individual cells. In specialized tissues, the intercellular resistance is expected to be reduced when compared with the presence of homotypic channels alone. The decrease depends on the fraction of heterotypic channels. This follows from the serial arrangement of Cx40–Cx43 hemichannels versus Cx40–Cx40 and Cx43–Cx43 hemichannels and the possible involvement of some fraction of homotypic and heterotypic channels including Cx45 hemichannels.16

Currents carried by heterotypic Cx40–Cx43 channels represent a novel finding. The induced cell pair approach may have prevented their detection in transfected HeLa cells.23 This would be the case provided Cx40–Cx43 channels form more slowly than others. Presumably, such channels were not seen in paired Xenopus oocytes because of the low expression level of exogenous connexins or the suboptimal temperature for processing vertebrate proteins.20 22 It is also possible that the formation of Cx40–Cx43 channels relies critically on the presence of cell adhesion molecules such as L-CAM or cadherins,35 36 a requirement ideally met in RIN and HeLa cells. Interestingly, Cx26–Cx37, Cx32–Cx37, and Cx32–Cx43 establish no heterotypic channels in injected oocytes37 but do so in transfected HeLa cells (F.F. Bukauskas, R.W., unpublished data, 1995).


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by a National Institutes of Health grant (GM55263, to P.R.B.) and a Swiss National Science Foundation grant (31-55297.98, to R.W.). The authors would like to thank Dr T. Steinberg for parental RIN cells and Cx43-transfected cells, Dr K. Willecke for Cx45-HeLa cells, and Dr E. Beyer for advice and support. The authors acknowledge the expert technical assistance of Laima Valiuniene.

Received December 3, 1999; accepted January 3, 2000.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Christ GJ, Spray DC, el-Sabban M, Moore LK, Brink PR. Gap junctions in vascular tissues. Evaluating the role of intercellular communication in the modulation of vasomotor tone. Circ Res. 1996;79:631–646.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Beyer EC. Gap junctions. Int Rev Cytol. 1993;137C:1–37.

3. Kanter HL, Laing JG, Beau SL, Beyer EC, Saffitz JE. Distinct patterns of connexin expression in canine Purkinje fibers and ventricular muscle. Circ Res. 1993;72:1124–1131.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Kanter HL, Laing JG, Beyer EC, Green KG, Saffitz JE. Multiple connexins colocalize in canine ventricular myocyte gap junctions. Circ Res. 1993;73:344–350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. ten Velde I, de Jonge B, Verheijck EE, van Kempen MJ, Analbers L, Gros D, Jongsma HJ. Spatial distribution of connexin43, the major cardiac gap junction protein, visualizes the cellular network for impulse propagation from sinoatrial node to atrium. Circ Res. 1995;76:802–811.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Gourdie RG, Green CR, Severs NJ, Thompson RP. Immunolabelling patterns of gap junction connexins in the developing and mature rat heart. Anat Embryol (Berl). 1992;185:363–378.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Davis LM, Rodefeld ME, Green K, Beyer EC, Saffitz JE. Gap junction protein phenotypes of the human heart and conduction system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1995;6:813–822.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. van Kempen MJ, Fromaget C, Gros D, Moorman AF, Lamers WH. Spatial distribution of connexin43, the major cardiac gap junction protein, in the developing and adult rat heart. Circ Res. 1991;68:1638–1651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Bukauskas FF, Elfgang C, Willecke K, Weingart R. Biophysical properties of gap junction channels formed by mouse connexin40 in induced pairs of transfected human HeLa cells. Biophys J. 1995;68:2289–2298.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Brink PR, Ramanan SV, Christ GJ. Human connexin 43 gap junction channel gating: evidence for mode shifts and/or heterogeneity. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:C321–C331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Valiunas V, Bukauskas FF, Weingart R. Conductances and selective permeability of connexin43 gap junction channels examined in neonatal rat heart cells. Circ Res. 1997;80:708–719.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Brink PR, Cronin K, Banach K, Peterson E, Westphale EM, Seul KH, Ramanan SV, Beyer EC. Evidence for heteromeric gap junction channels formed from rat connexin43 and human connexin37. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:C1386–C1396.

13. Brink PR, Valiunas V, Christ GJ. Homotypic, heterotypic and heteromeric gap junction channels. In: Peracchia C, ed. Gap Junctions. New York, NY: Academic Press. In press.

14. He DS, Jiang JX, Taffet SM, Burt JM. Formation of heteromeric gap junction channels by connexins 40 and 43 in vascular smooth muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:6495–6500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Bevans CG, Harris AL. Direct high affinity modulation of connexin channel activity by cyclic nucleotides. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:3720–3725.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Valiunas V, Niessen H, Willecke K, Weingart R. Electrophysiological properties of gap junction channels in hepatocytes isolated from connexin32-deficient and wild-type mice. Pflügers Arch. 1999;437:846–856.

17. Verselis VK, Ginter CS, Bargiello TA. Opposite voltage gating polarities of two closely related connexins. Nature. 1994;368:348–351.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Bukauskas FF, Elfgang C, Willecke K, Weingart R. Heterotypic gap junction channels (connexin26-connexin32) violate the paradigm of unitary conductance. Pflügers Arch. 1995;429:870–872.

19. Bukauskas FF, Vogel R, Weingart R. Biophysical properties of heterotypic gap junctions newly formed between two types of insect cells. J Physiol (Lond). 1997;499:701 713.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. White TW, Paul DL, Goodenough DA, Bruzzone R. Functional analysis of selective interactions among rodent connexins. Mol Biol Cell. 1995;6:459–470.[Abstract]

21. White TW, Bruzzone R. Multiple connexin proteins in single intercellular channels: connexin compatibility and functional consequences. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1996;28:339–350.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Bruzzone R, Haefliger JA, Gimlich RL, Paul DL. Connexin40, a component of gap junctions in vascular endothelium, is restricted in its ability to interact with other connexins. Mol Biol Cell. 1993;4:7–20.[Abstract]

23. Haubrich S, Schwarz HJ, Bukauskas F, Lichtenberg-Frate H, Traub O, Weingart R, Willecke K. Incompatibility of connexin 40 and 43 Hemichannels in gap junctions between mammalian cells is determined by intracellular domains. Mol Biol Cell. 1996;7:1995–2006.[Abstract]

24. Krisciukaitis A. Computer programs for investigation of intercellular communication using double whole-cell voltage clamp. Electron Electric Eng. 1997;4:71 83.

25. Banach K, Weingart R. Connexin43 gap junctions exhibit asymmetrical gating properties. Pflügers Arch. 1996;431:775–785.

26. Beblo DA, Veenstra RD. Monovalent cation permeation through the connexin40 gap junction channel. Cs, Rb, K, Na, Li, TEA, TMA, TBA, and effects of anions Br, Cl, F, acetate, aspartate, glutamate, and NO3. J Gen Physiol. 1997;109:509–522.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Traub O, Eckert R, Lichtenberg-Fraté H, Elfgang C, Bastide B, Scheidtmann KH, Hülser DF, Willecke K. Immunohistochemical and electrophysiological characterization of murine connexin40 and -43 in mouse tissues and transfected human cells. Eur J Cell Biol. 1994;64:101–112.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Coppen SR, Dupont E, Rothery S, Severs NJ. Connexin45 expression is preferentially associated with the ventricular conduction system in mouse and rat heart. Circ Res. 1998;82:232–243.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Hülser DF, Rehkopf B, Traub O. Dispersed and aggregated gap junction channels identified by immunogold labeling of freeze-fractured membranes. Exp Cell Res. 1997;233:240–251.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Steiner E, Ebihara L. Functional characterization of canine connexin45. J Membr Biol. 1996;150:153–161.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Vogel R, Weingart R. Mathematical model of vertebrate gap junctions derived from electrical measurements on homotypic and heterotypic channels. J Physiol (Lond). 1998;510:177–189.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Coppen SR, Severs NJ, Gourdie RG. Connexin45 ({alpha}6) expression delineates an extended conduction system in the embryonic and mature rodent heart. Dev Genet. 1999;24:82–90.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Alcolea S, Theveniau-Ruissy M, Jarry-Guichard T, Marics I, Tzouanacou E, Chauvin JP, Briand JP, Moorman AF, Lamers WH, Gros DB. Downregulation of connexin 45 gene products during mouse heart development. Circ Res. 1999;84:1365–1379.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Delorme B, Dahl E, Jarry-Guichard T, Briand JP, Willecke K, Gros D, Theveniau Ruissy M. Expression pattern of connexin gene products at the early developmental stages of the mouse cardiovascular system. Circ Res. 1997;81:423–437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Musil LS, Goodenough DA. Biochemical analysis of connexin43 intracellular transport, phosphorylation, and assembly into gap junction plaques. J Cell Biol. 1991;115:1357–1374.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Frenzel EM, Johnson RG. Gap junction formation between cultured embryonic lens cells is inhibited by antibody to N-cadherin. Dev Biol. 1996;179:1–16.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. White TW, Bruzzone R, Wolfram S, Paul DL, Goodenough DA. Selective interactions among the multiple connexin proteins expressed in the vertebrate lens: the second extracellular domain is a determinant of compatibility between connexins. J Cell Biol. 1994;125:879–892.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
X. Lin and R. D. Veenstra
Action potential modulation of connexin40 gap junctional conductance
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2004; 286(5): H1726 - H1735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
H. Li, S. Brodsky, S. Kumari, V. Valiunas, P. Brink, J.-I. Kaide, A. Nasjletti, and M. S. Goligorsky
Paradoxical overexpression and translocation of connexin43 in homocysteine-treated endothelial cells
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): H2124 - H2133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
H. Honjo, M. R Boyett, S. R Coppen, Y. Takagishi, T. Opthof, N. J Severs, and I. Kodama
Heterogeneous expression of connexins in rabbit sinoatrial node cells: correlation between connexin isotype and cell size
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2002; 53(1): 89 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
J. M. Burt, A. M. Fletcher, T. D. Steele, Y. Wu, G. T. Cottrell, and D. T. Kurjiaka
Alteration of Cx43:Cx40 expression ratio in A7r5 cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, March 1, 2001; 280(3): C500 - C508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Valiunas, V.
Right arrow Articles by Brink, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Valiunas, V.
Right arrow Articles by Brink, P. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Ion channels/membrane transport
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs