Editorials |
From the Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Correspondence to Stephen M. Schwartz, MD, PhD, Vascular Biology, Box 357335, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7335. E-mail steves{at}u.washington.edu
Key Words: intima atherosclerosis atherosclerotic lesion coronary artery
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The surprise is that this is only the second atherosclerosis-prone site to be studied at such an early stage. There are very few studies of developmental intimal formation at any site, despite our knowledge that this tissue, the arterial intima, is the normal tissue, the "soil," in which atherosclerotic lesions develop.2 The only extensive studies of intimal formation are in the ductus arteriosus.3 4 5 Of course, the ductus is not a site that develops atherosclerosis. The only atherosclerosis-prone intima reported on before the present study is the left anterior descending carotid artery.6
Our lack of knowledge of the role of the intima in atherosclerosis may be an inadvertent result of the recent success of studies of atherosclerosis in fat-fed or genetically hyperlipemic animal models.7 8 9 Such studies equate macrophage accumulations in the intima with early lesions of atherosclerosis. In severe cases, such accumulations of lipid can even occlude coronary arteries.10 This identification of foam cell lesions, also called "fatty streaks," with the precursors of the human atherosclerotic lesion is not fully consistent with the classification scheme of the American Heart Association Committee on Lesions. The consensus committee did report on fatty streaks in humans; however, the scheme identified the early lesions at sites prone to show atherosclerosis in adults as deposits of lipid deep within intimal masses.11 This consensus view is also supported by studies of human coronary arteries by the Velicans12 13 and of swine vessels by Thomas et al.14 Indeed, Thomas and colleagues used detailed cell kinetic studies to show that lesions in this animal model arose by relatively few cell doublings of the preexisting intimal cells. The concept of lesions arising in preexisting intimal masses was later supported by studies from this laboratory showing that the clonal properties of plaque smooth muscle cells may be best explained by expansion of preexisting clonal masses, found even in nonatherosclerotic intima.15 We simply do not know whether similar clonality can eventually occur in the lesions induced by hyperlipemia in animal models at sites that do not have a preexisting intima.
The mechanism(s) underlying intimal formation are almost completely unknown, except in the special cases of neointimal formation after balloon angioplasty.2 In this special case, a cascade of growth functions accounts for proliferation of medial cells and their migration across the intimal elastica. There is no reason to believe, or not to believe, that similar mechanisms underlie the spontaneous formation of intima during development.
Among the few studies of spontaneous intimal formation, the most elegant studies are those of Rabinovitch et al,2 who have investigated the formation of the intima in the ductus arteriosus. These studies blocked intima formation by gene therapy with a decoy RNA designed to block fibronectin transcription. A second piece of the puzzle may have emerged from Keatings use of knockout mice to model supravalvular aortic stenosis. This human genetic disorder is accounted for by massive deletions in the elastin gene. Intriguingly, normal mice do not spontaneously form an arterial intima. However, deletion of elastin by homologous recombination in mice results in formation of an exuberant intima whereas hemizygous deletion results in a formation of excess numbers of elastic lamellae.16 These studies suggest that intimal formation may be a developmental anomaly, dependent on completion of the internal elastica at an appropriate time to prevent trapping of some smooth muscle cells between the endothelium and the internal elastica.
Given the evidence for a concordance of the distribution of neonatal intimal masses with the distribution of lesions in adult humans, it seems likely that some property of the intimal cells accounts for localization of lesions. Perhaps the simplest hypothesis, as put forward by Williams and Tabas,17 is that the cells making up these intimal masses have special properties that contribute to lipid accumulation at focal sites. There is some evidence that intimal cells do have a very different phenotype than medial smooth muscle. More than 80 genes have been identified as showing differential expression between intimal smooth muscle compared with normal medial cells.2 However, a large part of these differences represents differential expression by cells in a healing wound, in the case of angioplasty, or at an inflamed site, in the case of atherosclerosis.18 The relevance of such responses to injury to properties of spontaneously formed intima is not known.
A large number of studies compare such adaptive changes of intimal cells to the changes seen when smooth muscle cells dedifferentiate in vitro.19 These studies purport to distinguish smooth muscle cells in a "synthetic" versus a "contractile" phenotype. This distinction arises because cultured smooth muscle cells are dedifferentiated, highly replicative, and synthetic. It is true that in vivo intimal cells, including smooth muscle cells, in the atherosclerotic plaque lack the contractile proteins that characterize smooth muscle cells in the media. However, dedifferentiated, smooth muscle cells in the intima have never been shown to be replicative, their contribution to contractile properties of vessels has not been studied, and there is little evidence that these smooth muscle cells are any more active than medial smooth muscle cells in protein synthesis. In short, the terms "synthetic" and "contractile" are poorly defined, and we do not know the relevance of these in vitro to the phenotype of intimal cells.
One important issue is a dearth of literature on the in vitro properties of cells cultured from the intima. Although cells from the spontaneously formed intima have not been studied in vitro, there is some evidence that the most important intimal cells, that is, the plaque smooth muscle cells, are genetically distinct from medial smooth muscle. There are several reports of chromosomal changes or loss of heterozygosity in cells obtained from the plaque (reviewed in Schwartz et al2 ). The most impressive of such data comes from recent studies by McCaffrey et al,20 21 suggesting that plaque cells have a distinctive mutation in the transforming growth factor-ß receptor. If this report holds up, then we need to consider the possibility that lesions arise in a subset of smooth muscle cells with a somatic cell mutation.
Such a genetic change implies that cultured intimal cells, or at least plaque cells, should have very distinctive properties. The only relevant literature on properties of intimal cells may be a report showing that rat smooth muscle cells cultured from the neointima formed after balloon injury have growth properties quite distinctive from the properties of cultured medial cells.22 These properties include a very distinct morphology and expression of platelet-derived growth factor-B, phenomena also seen in the rat neointima in vivo.23 A few studies have also appeared reporting special properties of cells grown from advanced human plaques including loss of replicative life span and acquisition of a high apoptotic rate. We do not know, however, whether these changes are acquired over the decades of exposure to cytokines and cytotoxic oxidation products.24 Again, the observations by McCaffrey et al20 21 suggest that cultured plaque cells have distinctive properties and that these properties might reflect selection of a subset of cells with a somatic mutation. Unfortunately, to my knowledge, there are no studies of the properties of human intimal cells cultured from nonatherosclerotic sites.
Finally, it is essential to realize that we do not know the origin of all intimal cells. Bobryshev and Lord25 have noted that some human intimal cells express markers for dendritic cells, suggesting a shared origin with immunocompetent cells located throughout the body. Recent publications even raise the disturbing possibility that intimal cells may arise by delamination of endothelial cells or even from circulating precursors.26 27 28 29
In summary, Weninger et al1 have written a potentially seminal article. In their discussion, they raise very intriguing questions about the relevance of their developmental data to the later development of atherosclerotic lesions in these sites. Access to this site in surgical specimens, but even more importantly by noninvasive imaging, suggests that we will learn a great deal more in the studies to come.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. M. Schwartz, Z. S. Galis, M. E. Rosenfeld, and E. Falk Plaque Rupture in Humans and Mice Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., April 1, 2007; 27(4): 705 - 713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Wenzlau, P. J. Garl, P. Simpson, K. R. Stenmark, J. West, K. B. Artinger, R. A. Nemenoff, and M. C.M. Weiser-Evans Embryonic Growth-Associated Protein Is One Subunit of a Novel N-Terminal Acetyltransferase Complex Essential for Embryonic Vascular Development Circ. Res., March 31, 2006; 98(6): 846 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Morrow, A. Scheller, Y. A. Birney, C. Sweeney, S. Guha, P. M. Cummins, R. Murphy, D. Walls, E. M. Redmond, and P. A. Cahill Notch-mediated CBF-1/RBP-J{kappa}-dependent regulation of human vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype in vitro Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2005; 289(5): C1188 - C1196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zampetaki, Z. Zhang, Y. Hu, and Q. Xu Biomechanical stress induces IL-6 expression in smooth muscle cells via Ras/Rac1-p38 MAPK-NF-{kappa}B signaling pathways Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): H2946 - H2954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zernecke, A. Schober, I. Bot, P. von Hundelshausen, E. A. Liehn, B. Mopps, M. Mericskay, P. Gierschik, E. A. Biessen, and C. Weber SDF-1{alpha}/CXCR4 Axis Is Instrumental in Neointimal Hyperplasia and Recruitment of Smooth Muscle Progenitor Cells Circ. Res., April 15, 2005; 96(7): 784 - 791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Liu, Z.-Q. Chen, G. C. Bobustuc, J. M. McNatt, H. Segall, S. Pan, J. T. Willerson, and P. Zoldhelyi Local Gene Transduction of Cyclooxygenase-1 Increases Blood Flow in Injured Atherosclerotic Rabbit Arteries Circulation, April 12, 2005; 111(14): 1833 - 1840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Scholz and W. Schaper Preconditioning of arteriogenesis Cardiovasc Res, February 1, 2005; 65(2): 513 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Mulvihill, J. Jaeger, R. Sengupta, W. L. Ruzzo, C. Reimer, S. Lukito, and S. M. Schwartz Atherosclerotic Plaque Smooth Muscle Cells Have a Distinct Phenotype Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2004; 24(7): 1283 - 1289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schober, S. Knarren, M. Lietz, E. A. Lin, and C. Weber Crucial Role of Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1{alpha} in Neointima Formation After Vascular Injury in Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice Circulation, November 18, 2003; 108(20): 2491 - 2497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. OSTERUD and E. BJORKLID Role of Monocytes in Atherogenesis Physiol Rev, October 1, 2003; 83(4): 1069 - 1112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Geary, J. M. Wong, A. Rossini, S. M. Schwartz, and L. D. Adams Expression Profiling Identifies 147 Genes Contributing to a Unique Primate Neointimal Smooth Muscle Cell Phenotype Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2002; 22(12): 2010 - 2016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zaina, L. Pettersson, B. Ahren, L. Branen, A. B. Hassan, M. Lindholm, R. Mattsson, J. Thyberg, and J. Nilsson Insulin-like Growth Factor II Plays a Central Role in Atherosclerosis in a Mouse Model J. Biol. Chem., February 1, 2002; 277(6): 4505 - 4511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Yang, A. Madinova, T. Kozai, H. Joch, U. Aebi, and T. F Luscher Felodipine inhibits nuclear translocation of p42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinase and human smooth muscle cell growth Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2002; 53(1): 227 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Moiseeva Adhesion receptors of vascular smooth muscle cells and their functions Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2001; 52(3): 372 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. McGillicuddy, M. J. Carrier, and P. D. Weinberg Distribution of Lipid Deposits Around Aortic Branches of Mice Lacking LDL Receptors and Apolipoprotein E Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 2001; 21(7): 1220 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Zoldhelyi, Z.-Q. Chen, H. S. Shelat, J. M. McNatt, and J. T. Willerson Local gene transfer of tissue factor pathway inhibitor regulates intimal hyperplasia in atherosclerotic arteries PNAS, March 27, 2001; 98(7): 4078 - 4083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Hsueh, S. Jackson, and R. E. Law Control of Vascular Cell Proliferation and Migration by PPAR-{gamma}: A new approach to the macrovascular complications of diabetes Diabetes Care, February 1, 2001; 24(2): 392 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. DiCorleto Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases in the Vessel Wall : Counterpoint to the Tyrosine Kinases Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2000; 20(5): 1179 - 1181. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Jacobson Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia : A Model for Blood Vessel Growth and Enlargement Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2000; 156(3): 737 - 742. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |