Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1999;84:371-377

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thollon, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vilaine, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thollon, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vilaine, J. P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide
(Circulation Research. 1999;84:371-377.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contribution

Alteration of Endothelium-Dependent Hyperpolarizations in Porcine Coronary Arteries With Regenerated Endothelium

Catherine Thollon, Jean P. Bidouard, Christine Cambarrat, Isabelle Delescluse, Nicole Villeneuve, Paul M. Vanhoutte, Jean P. Vilaine

From the Institut de Recherches Servier, Suresnes, France.

Correspondence to Catherine Thollon, PhD, Institut de Recherches Servier, Division pathologies cardiaques et vasculaires, 11 rue des Moulineaux, 92150 Suresnes, France.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—The present study was designed to test the ability of regenerated endothelium to evoke endothelium-dependent hyperpolarizations. Hyperpolarizations induced by serotonin and bradykinin were compared in isolated porcine coronary arteries with native or regenerated endothelium, 4 weeks after balloon endothelial denudation. The experiments were performed in the presence of inhibitors of nitric oxide synthase (N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine) and cyclooxygenase (indomethacin). The transmembrane potential was measured using conventional glass microelectrodes. Smooth muscle cells from coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium were depolarized in comparison with control coronary arteries from the same hearts. Spontaneous membrane potential oscillations of small amplitude or spikes were observed in some of these arteries but never in arteries with native endothelium. In coronary arteries from control pigs, both serotonin and bradykinin induced concentration-dependent hyperpolarizations. In the presence of ketanserin, 10 µmol/L serotonin induced a transient hyperpolarization in control coronary arteries. Four weeks after balloon denudation, the response to serotonin was normal in arteries with native endothelium, but the hyperpolarization was significantly lower in coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium. In control arteries, the endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization obtained with bradykinin (30 nmol/L) was reproducible. Four weeks after balloon denudation, comparable hyperpolarizations were obtained in coronary arteries with native endothelium. By contrast, in arteries with regenerated endothelium, the hyperpolarization to bradykinin became voltage-dependent. In the most depolarized cells, the hyperpolarization to bradykinin was augmented. The changes in resting membrane potential and the alteration in endothelium-dependent hyperpolarizations observed in the coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium may contribute to the reduced response to serotonin and the unchanged relaxation to bradykinin described previously.


Key Words: regenerated endothelium • endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor • serotonin • bradykinin


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
By releasing endothelium-derived relaxing factors (EDRFs) such as nitric oxide (NO),1 prostacyclin,2 and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF),3 4 the endothelium plays a key role in modulating the responses of the underlying vascular smooth muscle cells.5 All the major cardiovascular risk factors have been associated with endothelial dysfunction, which precedes clinically apparent vascular disease and its complications.6 Hypertension,7 diabetes mellitus,8 hypercholesterolemia,9 and atherosclerosis10 are associated with decreased responses to endothelium-dependent vasodilators. Experiments in animal models suggest that the occurrence of abnormal endothelium-dependent relaxations is an early event in the development of vascular disease.11 12 13 Because the turnover of endothelial cells is accelerated under most of these conditions,14 the functional alterations in the regenerated endothelium could play an important role in the genesis of coronary disease. Previous studies13 demonstrated that, in porcine coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium after balloon denudation, endothelium-dependent relaxations are normalized 8 days after the procedure. However, 4 weeks after denudation, the relaxations to UK 14,304 (a selective {alpha}2-adrenergic agonist), serotonin and aggregating platelets were reduced, whereas those induced by ADP, bradykinin, and the calcium ionophore A23187 were maintained. Because the decrease in endothelium-dependent relaxations seems restricted to stimuli that activate endothelial Gi-2 proteins,15 16 a selective Gi protein dysfunction seems likely.17 18 19 This selective endothelium impairment and the resulting marked dysfunction in the NO-EDRF pathway does not result from a change in the expression of Gi proteins but rather reflects their reduced function in regenerated endothelial cells.18 However, because EDHF contributes to the endothelium-dependent relaxations to bradykinin and A23187,20 an upregulation of the release of this factor rather than a selective Gi protein dysfunction may explain the better preservation of endothelium-dependent relaxations to these agonists. The present experiments were designed to test the ability of regenerated endothelium to evoke hyperpolarizations of the underlying smooth muscle of the porcine coronary artery.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animals
Sixty-three Large White pigs (male or female), 8 to 12 weeks of age, were used for the electrophysiological study. The animals were purchased from a commercial swine producer (Frenelles E.A.R.L., Boisemont, France) in accordance with the French Ministry of Agriculture. All experiments were performed in accordance with governmental and institutional guidelines for the use and care of animals.

Coronary Endothelium Denudation
Thirty-four pigs, 8 weeks old (mean weight 21±0.5 kg), were anesthetized with an intramuscular injection of a mixture composed of tiletamine plus zolazepam (20 mg/kg) and atropine sulfate (50 µg/kg). Additional doses of anesthetic (sodium thiopental) were given intravenously as necessary. Animals were intubated with an endotracheal tube and mechanically ventilated with a respirator. Heparin (250 IU/kg) and lysin acetylsalicylate (10 mg/kg) were administrated intravenously to prevent thrombus formation and limit inflammation, respectively. Using aseptic surgical techniques, a percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) guide catheter (Cordis, model AR1 7F) was introduced via the femoral artery into the left or right coronary ostium, under fluoroscopic guidance (Radioselectan contrast product, x-ray imager, model BV25, Philips). A PTCA dilatation catheter (Cordis, balloon of 2 to 3 mm in diameter and 20 to 30 mm long) was then introduced into the chosen coronary artery through the guide catheter. The diameter of the balloon was adapted according to the size of the coronary artery. The endothelium was removed by inflating the balloon 3 times for 30 seconds. The pressure of inflation was adjusted so that the blood vessel was not overstretched (from 2 atm at the distal side to 8 atm at the proximal side). At the end of the surgical procedure, Terramycin (20 mg/kg) was given intramuscularly as an antibiotic prophylaxis. After recovery from anesthesia, the animals were housed in individual cages for 4 weeks. At the time of killing (12 weeks of age), the body weight of these animals was 32±0.7 kg. The control animals (nonoperated) were killed at 10 weeks of age (n=29, body weight 25±0.8 kg).

Membrane Potential Recording
After anesthesia with tiletamine plus zolazepam (20 mg/kg, IM), the heart was removed and rapidly placed in an ice-cold oxygenated Krebs-Ringer solution. Then the left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries were dissected-free, cleaned of adherent fat and connective tissue, and maintained in an oxygenated Krebs-Ringer solution at room temperature. All procedures did not last more than 15 minutes. Rings of coronary arteries (approximately 4 mm long) were cut open along the longitudinal axis and pinned on the bottom of an experimental chamber (2.5 mL) covered with Sylgard, the endothelial side upward. The strips were superfused continuously at 5 mL/min with an oxygenated modified Krebs-Ringer solution (95% O2/5% CO2, 36.5±0.5°C, pH 7.4) of the following composition (mmol/L): NaCl 118, KCl 4.7, MgSO4 1.2, KH2PO4 1.2, CaCl2 2.5, NaHCO3 25, EDTA 0.026, and glucose 11. After a resting period of 30 to 45 minutes, membrane potential was measured with conventional glass microelectrodes (30 to 40 M{Omega}) filled with 3 mol/L KCl. The microelectrode was connected to an amplifier (model V180, Biologic), and the membrane potential was monitored simultaneously on a digital storage oscilloscope (model 2211, Tektronix,) and a pen-chart recorder (model 3400, Gould). Criteria for considering the impalement successful were a sudden negative shift in potential at the cell penetration and a rapid return to the previous potential at the withdrawal of the microelectrode. A small potential deflection was often observed before abrupt penetration of the cell and on dislodgement of the microelectrode, probably as a result of crossing the endothelial cells.

Protocol
In all experiments, the response of the coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium was compared with that of control coronary arteries from the same heart. Because the same vascular preparation was never used for 2 consecutive experiments, the number of experiments performed corresponded to the number of vascular strips used. Furthermore, when unspecified, the number of experiments (n) corresponded to the number of animals. All experiments were performed in the presence of indomethacin (10 µmol/L) to inhibit cyclooxygenase and N{omega}-nitro-L-arginine (L-NA, 30 µmol/L) to inhibit NO synthase (NOS).

For the experiments with serotonin, ketanserin (10 µmol/L) was added to the physiological solution to inhibit the 5-hydroxytryptamine 2 (5-HT2) receptors present on the vascular smooth muscle of the porcine coronary artery.13 The membrane potential was measured at the end of the resting period (control values), after the incubation with different drugs and during the addition of agonists (serotonin or bradykinin).

Drugs
The following drugs were used: indomethacin, L-NA, ketanserin, 5-HT creatinine sulfate, and bradykinin (all from Sigma Chemical Co). Indomethacin (10 mmol/L, in ethanol), ketanserin (10 mmol/L, in H2O), and bradykinin (1 mmol/L, in H2O) were prepared as stock solutions (-20°C) and diluted in Krebs-Ringer solution to reach final concentrations. L-NA and serotonin were dissolved daily in H2O (10 mmol/L). Further dilutions were performed directly in Krebs-Ringer solution. Serotonin and bradykinin were added to the Krebs-Ringer solution to reach final concentrations of 10 µmol/L and 30 nmol/L, respectively, immediately before the application to the vascular preparation.

Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean±SEM from n experiments. For the experiments performed on coronary arteries from control animals, 1-way ANOVA with repeated measures was first carried out and followed by a Newman-Keuls test to analyze the effect of treatments. For the comparison between control coronary arteries from operated animals versus coronary arteries from control pigs, 2-way ANOVA with repeated measures on 1 factor followed by a Newman-Keuls test was performed. To compare the responses between the coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium to those with native endothelium from the same animals, Student t test for paired observations was used and followed with 2-way ANOVA with repeated measures on 2 factors. Differences were considered to be statistically significant at a value of P<0.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Resting Membrane Potential
In the control arteries taken from animals not subjected to a surgical procedure, the resting membrane potential of the coronary smooth muscle cells averaged -56.3±1.7 mV (n=15). Twenty-eight days after endothelium denudation, the resting membrane potential of smooth muscle cells from the coronary arteries with native endothelium was not significantly different from that observed in control animals (-57.1±0.7 mV, n=34). In coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium, before any pharmacological intervention, the smooth muscle cells were significantly less polarized than in the corresponding control arteries (-49.9±1.2 mV; P<=0.01, n=34). Under control conditions, in 4 strips with regenerated endothelium, membrane potential oscillations (amplitude 4.9±1.0 mV), with a spontaneous frequency of 6.5±0.4/min, were recorded (Figure 1ADown). All impaled cells from these 4 vascular preparations showed similar fluctuations in resting membrane potential. Such oscillations were never observed in either coronary arteries from control animals or coronary arteries with native endothelium from pigs subjected to angioplasty 4 weeks earlier. When the vascular strips were superfused with the incubation solution, before the addition of agonists causing hyperpolarization, a slow depolarization on the first 20 minutes was observed, ie, approximating 5 mV under all experimental conditions and all vascular tissues. Bradykinin or serotonin was given when the resting membrane potential had stabilized (TableDown). After the superfusion with the solution containing pharmacological inhibitors, the resting membrane potential was still significantly different between smooth muscle cells from coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium and native endothelium (TableDown). Some coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium (n=7) that had stable resting membrane potential under control conditions showed fluctuations of the membrane potential during incubation with the NOS blocker L-NA. Under these conditions, the amplitude of the oscillations was higher (6.4±1.8 mV, n=4) (Figure 1BDown) and could even generate spikes (Figure 1cDown), with an averaged maximal amplitude of 18.8±5.7 (n=3). The upstroke of these action potentials attained maximal levels, ranging between -15 and -20 mV and never showed an overshoot. The frequency of spontaneous fluctuations in membrane potential during exposure to L-NA was identical as under control conditions (7.6±0.8/min).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Oscillations in resting membrane potential in coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium. Example of recordings obtained in 3 different coronary arteries. A, Membrane potential fluctuations of small amplitude (3 to 4 mV) and frequency (7/min) during the resting period (Krebs-Ringer solution) before any pharmacological intervention. B, Recordings of membrane potential in the presence of the NOS blocker L-NA (30 µmol/L) in 2 preparations with regenerated endothelium that were quiescent during the resting period. a, Membrane potential fluctuations of the same frequency as in panel A (7/min) but with higher amplitude (8 to 9 mV). Recordings in panels b and c were obtained in 2 cells from the same vascular preparation. In these cells, some of the slow waves of depolarization lead to the generation of spikes with an amplitude in the range of 10 to 25 mV.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Changes in Resting Membrane Potential During the Incubation Period Before the Application of Serotonin or Bradykinin

Hyperpolarization to Serotonin
In the presence of indomethacin (10 µmol/L), L-NA (30 µmol/L), and ketanserin (1 µmol/L), serotonin induced endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization in coronary strips from control animals. The response to serotonin was concentration-dependent (Figure 2Down) with maximal changes in membrane potential of -3.0±1.1 mV (n=6), -7.8±1.6 mV (n=7), and -13.2±1.9 mV (n=6), at 0.1, 1, and 10 µmol/L, respectively. These hyperpolarizations were transient. Thus, at 10 µmol/L serotonin, the hyperpolarization was maximal after 25.1±1.6 seconds. The membrane potential returned to control level within 1 minute (58.6±4.1 seconds, n=7).



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Maximal effect of serotonin on membrane potential in coronary arteries from 7 control pigs. Data are mean±SEM of n separate experiments. Serotonin at 0.1 µmol/L (n=6), 1 µmol/L (n=7), and 10 µmol/L (n=6) induced concentration-dependent hyperpolarizations (cross-hatched bars). All strips were treated with indomethacin (10 µmol/L) and L-NA (30 µmol/L) to block cyclooxygenase and NOS, respectively. Ketanserin (1 µmol/L) was also present for 5-HT2 receptor blockade. Significant difference from values before the administration of serotonin (open bars). ***P<0.001.

Four weeks after balloon endothelial denudation, the hyperpolarization induced by serotonin at 10 µmol/L in the presence of indomethacin (10 µmol/L), L-NA (30 µmol/L), and ketanserin (10 µmol/L) was not significantly different from control in coronary arteries with native endothelium: -10.6±1.6 mV (n=8) versus -10.8±1.2 mV in coronary strips (n=7) from unoperated animals. In arteries with regenerated endothelium (Figure 3Down), the response to serotonin was significantly less than the corresponding control strips (-5.6±1.7 mV, Figure 5Down; P<=0.05, n=8). Although the amplitude of the hyperpolarization was not influenced by the presence or absence of L-NA in control arteries, in arteries with regenerated endothelium, studied in the absence of L-NA, serotonin did not cause significant hyperpolarizations but rather evoked a small depolarization (Figure 3Down). Such depolarizations were not obtained in the presence of inhibitors of NOS, even in presence of spikes (Figure 3ADown) and also were never observed in coronary segments with native endothelium.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Changes in membrane potential induced by serotonin (10 µmol/L) in porcine coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium. Experiments were performed in the presence of 10 µmol/L ketanserin alone (KET) (n=5), ketanserin and 10 µmol/L indomethacin (KET+INDO) (n=5), or ketanserin, indomethacin, and 30 µmol/L L-NA (KET+INDO+L-NA) (n=8). All coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium were compared with control arteries from the same heart. A, Illustration of the hyperpolarization induced by serotonin. B, Maximal effect. Data are mean±SEM. Significant difference between native and regenerated endothelium. *P<0.05; **P<0.01. Significant difference from the experiments with L-NA for coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium. #P<0.05.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Hyperpolarization induced by bradykinin (BK, 30 nmol/L) in coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium. All coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium were compared with control arteries from the same heart. Experiments were performed in the presence of indomethacin (10 µmol/L) and L-NA (30 µmol/L). A, Illustration of the heterogeneity of responses to bradykinin. B, Maximal values of hyperpolarization induced by bradykinin. Data are mean±SEM from 16 experiments in coronary arteries from operated animals and 8 experiments in coronary arteries from 5 control pigs. Significant difference from the control coronary arteries with native endothelium. ***P<0.001.

Hyperpolarization to Bradykinin
In control porcine coronary arteries, bradykinin evoked concentration-dependent hyperpolarizations (Figure 4Down) resistant to indomethacin (10 µmol/L) and L-NA (30 µmol/L). The threshold concentration to obtain endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization was 3 nmol/L. With higher concentrations, the amplitude of membrane potential changes increased and the time to peak of hyperpolarization decreased (not shown). The maximal value of hyperpolarization was obtained at 100 nmol/L. Because at the concentration of 30 nmol/L the amplitude of hyperpolarization was reproducible, albeit not maximal, this concentration was used for the evaluation of the endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization induced by the kinin in arteries with regenerated endothelium.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Concentration-dependent curve of the hyperpolarization induced by bradykinin in coronary arteries from 12 control pigs. Experiments (n=29 coronary artery strips) were performed in the presence of indomethacin (10 µmol/L) and L-NA (30 µmol/L) to block cyclooxygenase and NOS, respectively. Data are mean±SEM. EC50=7.21±1.06 nmol/L.

Four weeks after balloon endothelial denudation, the response to bradykinin (30 nmol/L) was not altered in coronary strips with native endothelium (Figure 5Up): -20.9±0.7 mV (n=16) versus -21.5±0.8 mV hyperpolarization in arteries from control animals (n=8). The temporal changes in membrane potential were not modified: the more hyperpolarized potential was reached after {approx}1 minute, and the hyperpolarization lasted longer than 3 minutes. In the corresponding coronary segments with regenerated endothelium, although the average change in membrane potential was not different (-20.1±1.6 mV, n=16), the values of membrane potential before administration of bradykinin and that reached in its presence were significantly lower (Figure 5BUp). When examining the individual experiments, a high variability in the response to bradykinin was noticed in preparations with regenerated endothelium, showing identical, reduced, or increased hyperpolarizations (Figure 5AUp). The analysis of individual pairs of results showed that although similar responses were recorded in control arteries, the changes in membrane potential for segments with regenerated endothelium were related to the value of membrane potential immediately before the administration of the kinin (Figure 6Down). In the more depolarized cells, bradykinin evoked a larger hyperpolarization (up to -40 mV) (Figure 5AUp, bottom panel, and Figure 6Down).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Voltage dependence of the hyperpolarization induced by bradykinin in porcine coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium. All experiments were performed in the presence of indomethacin (10 µmol/L) and L-NA (30 µmol/L).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
There are 2 main findings in the present study: (1) Four weeks after balloon endothelial denudation, the smooth muscle cells from porcine coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium showed intrinsic alterations of the resting membrane potential. (2) The changes in the endothelium-dependent hyperpolarizations of these cells may contribute to the reduced response to serotonin and the unchanged relaxation to bradykinin described previously.13,17,18

Resting Membrane Potential in Arteries With Regenerated Endothelium
The present study demonstrates that the smooth muscle cells from coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium are depolarized in comparison to those from the corresponding control arteries. The depolarization of these cells imply alterations of ionic conductance(s) implicated in the control of the resting membrane potential. This could be achieved by an increase in a depolarizing current (inward calcium or nonspecific currents and/or outward chloride current), a decrease in an outward repolarizing or hyperpolarizing potassium current, or both. Such alterations could include changes in the number of active channels, variations in their open probability, or differences in their regulation. Obviously, alterations in ionic homeostasis could also change the driving force for ions and thus affect the ionic current. Whatever the cause of this relative depolarization, the change in resting membrane potential in these coronary arteries is relevant, because it could modify the myogenic tone of these vessels. This interpretation is confirmed by the observation of spontaneous electrical activities in some arteries with regenerated endothelium. Such membrane potential instability was not observed in the corresponding control arteries. The resting membrane potential of arterial smooth muscle cells is generally stable22 except in the microvasculature23 ; in the cerebral microcirculation, spontaneous contractions have been associated with an unstable membrane potential of smooth muscle cells.24 The membrane potential of smooth muscle cells in rhythmically constricting arteries is also significantly less negative than that of quiescent ones.25 In the porcine coronary artery, cell membrane potential oscillations, spikes, and associated spontaneous contractions have been observed, under marked depolarization with tetrabutylammonium, a potassium channel blocker.26 The membrane potential oscillations obtained in the present study may be partly the result of the depolarized state of the smooth muscle cells. Indeed, action potentials can be generated only within a certain range of cell membrane potential ({approx}-40 to -20 mV).24 Furthermore, rhythmic spontaneous activity has been demonstrated in human coronary arteries and with higher frequency in vessels from older patients or those with cardiovascular diseases27 and atherosclerotic changes.28 Hence, the depolarization of smooth muscle cells, observed 4 weeks after balloon denudation, may be a key factor in the development of alterations in vasomotion of these coronary arteries.

Previous studies have shown, in the same porcine model, a decreased response to serotonin while the relaxation to bradykinin remained normal,13 17 18 despite the reduction in the EDRF-NO pathway. Therefore, the endothelium-dependent hyperpolarizations induced by both agonists were compared in porcine coronary arteries 4 weeks after denudation and in control arteries.

Endothelium-Dependent Hyperpolarization Induced by Serotonin and Bradykinin
In the coronary arteries from control pigs, both serotonin and bradykinin induced concentration-dependent hyperpolarizations that are resistant to indomethacin and L-NA. The hyperpolarizations observed in the present study during exposure to bradykinin are in agreement with previous observations.29 30 Under the experimental conditions imposed, bradykinin given at 30 nmol/L as a single concentration induced an endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization of smooth muscle cells of {approx}-20 mV. This level of hyperpolarization was slightly higher than that observed when concentrations of bradykinin were applied in a cumulative manner.29 The temporal aspects of the membrane hyperpolarization were also in agreement with previous reports.30 31 32 On the contrary, the endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization induced by serotonin was transient, and it was observed at higher concentrations. A similar response to serotonin has been reported in the same preparation.33 In preliminary studies, it was noted that the response to serotonin is labile, in that many factors can influence the amplitude of the hyperpolarization: (1) rapidity of dissection of coronary arteries after heart excision; (2) stretch of the blood vessels during dissection; (3) a long period before the beginning of the experiments (the response was markedly reduced after 8 hours); and (4) previous exposure to serotonin even after a long washout (desensitization).

Although an EDRF has been demonstrated to be NO,34 the nature of EDHF is still unknown. It could be a cytochrome P450 metabolite, derived from arachidonic acid.35 36 37 38 When considering differences between hyperpolarizations induced by bradykinin and serotonin in the present study or those provoked by bradykinin and A23187 compared with that of thrombin,30 one cannot exclude the existence of several EDHFs. These hyperpolarizations, resistant to indomethacin and L-NA, differ by their amplitude and their kinetics. The fact that in the presence of regenerated endothelium, the transient response to serotonin was reduced while the sustained hyperpolarization induced by bradykinin could be increased would be also in favor of the existence of 2 different mechanisms. It is generally accepted that EDHF increases a potassium conductance leading to the hyperpolarization of the smooth muscle cells.20 Because all potassium channels implicated in the control of resting membrane potential of smooth muscle cells are voltage-dependent, the depolarization of smooth muscle cells in coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium would be expected to influence the response to EDHF. In the vascular strips with regenerated endothelium, the response to bradykinin was correlated with the value of membrane potential before the administration of the kinin. The maximal opening of potassium channels would lead the membrane to reach potential values close to the equilibrium potential for potassium. Therefore, in preparations with regenerated endothelium, the depolarization of smooth muscle cells induced an increase in the response to bradykinin, illustrating an augmentation of the EDHF pathway in the most altered cells. This result correlates well with previous experiments showing a maintained relaxation to bradykinin in coronary strips with regenerated endothelium,17 18 whereas it was blunted under depolarizing conditions.18 Therefore, the lack of impairment of the bradykinin-evoked relaxation, despite a reduction in the NO pathway, could be the result of a greater contribution of the EDHF pathway. Furthermore, although an altered relaxation to serotonin was described in the same experimental model, the present study demonstrates a reduction in the hyperpolarization induced by serotonin. The fact that relaxations to serotonin in porcine coronary arteries are almost completely inhibited by the presence of NOS inhibitors39 is in favor of a poor participation of the EDHF pathway to the response. This interpretation is supported by the weak hyperpolarizations obtained at high concentrations of serotonin in the present study. Because this small endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization induced by serotonin is decreased 4 weeks after balloon denudation, no compensatory effect of EDHF for the reduced response to this agonist is plausible. On the contrary, depolarizations were observed that were not blocked by the presence of a high concentration of ketanserin, excluding the implication of 5-HT2 receptor on the vascular smooth muscle. These depolarizations may have curtailed the endothelium-dependent hyperpolarizations. Shimokawa et al13 have previously shown an increase in the contraction to serotonin in the same model and have suggested that the regenerated endothelium releases endothelium-derived contracting factor in response to the monoamine.

The present findings are in favor of a minor implication of EDHF in the endothelium-dependent response of porcine coronary artery to serotonin, but the participation of EDHF in the relaxation response to bradykinin is more important. After balloon endothelial denudation, the endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization induced by serotonin is markedly reduced in the presence of regenerated endothelium, whereas that generated by bradykinin is maintained or even increased in coronary arteries showing an alteration of resting membrane potential. Because in coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium the EDRF-NO pathway is markedly reduced,17 18 the present results help to explain the better preservation of endothelium-dependent relaxations to bradykinin in this model.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank C. Thomas-Haimez for expert statistical analysis.


*    Footnotes
 
Previously presented in part in abstract form (J Vasc Res. 1997;34:40. Abstract 140).

Received September 24, 1998; accepted December 2, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Furchgott RF, Zawadzki JV. The obligatory role of the endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine. Nature. 1980;288:373–376.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Bunting S, Moncada S, Vane JR. Antithrombotic properties of vascular endothelium. Lancet. 1977;19:1075–1076.

3. Taylor SG, Weston AH. Endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor: a new endogenous inhibitor from the vascular endothelium. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1988;9:272–274.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Feletou M, Vanhoutte PM. Endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization of canine coronary smooth muscle. Br J Pharmacol. 1988;93:515–524.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Furchgott RF, Vanhoutte PM. Endothelium-derived relaxing and contracting factors. FASEB J. 1989;3:2007–2018.[Abstract]

6. Cohen RA. The role of nitric oxide and other endothelium-derived vasoactive substances in vascular disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1995;38:105–128.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Lüscher TF, Vanhoutte PM. Endothelium-dependent responses to platelets and serotonin in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1986;8:II-55–II-60.

8. Cohen RA. Dysfunction of vascular endothelium in diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 1993;87:V-67–V-76.

9. Creager MA, Cooke JP, Mendelsohn ME, Gallagher SJ, Coleman SM, Loscalzo J, Dzau VJ. Impaired vasodilation of forearm resistance vessels in hypercholesterolemic humans. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:228–234.

10. Förstermann U, Mügge A, Alheid U, Haverich A, Frölich JC. Selective attenuation of endothelium-mediated vasodilation in atherosclerotic human coronary arteries. Circ Res. 1988;62:185–190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Yamamoto Y, Tomoike H, Egashira K, Nakamura M. Attenuation of endothelium-related relaxation and enhanced responsiveness of vascular smooth muscle to histamine in spastic coronary arterial segments from miniature pigs. Circ Res. 1987;61:772–778.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Cohen RA, Zitnay KM, Haudenschild CC, Cunningham D. Loss of selective endothelial cell vasoactive functions caused by hypercholesterolemia in pig coronary arteries. Circ Res. 1988;63:903–910.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Shimokawa H, Aarhus LL, Vanhoutte PM. Porcine coronary arteries with regenerated endothelium have a reduced endothelium-dependent responsiveness to aggregating platelets and serotonin. Circ Res. 1987;61:256–270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Schwartz SM, Benditt EP. Aortic endothelial cell replication. Effects of age and hypertension in the rat. Circ Res. 1977;41:248–255.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Flavahan NA, Shimokawa H, Vanhoutte PM. Pertussis toxin inhibits endothelium-dependent relaxations to certain agonists in porcine coronary arteries. J Physiol (Lond). 1989;408:549–560.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Flavahan NA, Vanhoutte PM. Endothelial cell signaling and endothelial dysfunction. Am J Hypertens. 1995;8:28S–41S.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Shimokawa H, Flavahan NA, Vanhoutte PM. Natural course of the impairment of endothelium-dependent relaxations after balloon endothelium removal in porcine coronary arteries. Circ Res. 1989;65:740–753.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Borg-Capra C, Fournet-Bourguignon M-P, Janiak P, Villeneuve N, Bidouard JP, Vilaine JP, Vanhoutte PM. Morphological heterogeneity with normal expression but altered function of G proteins in porcine cultured regenerated coronary endothelial cells. Br J Pharmacol. 1997;122:999–1008.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Boulanger CM, Vanhoutte PM. G proteins and endothelium-dependent relaxations. J Vasc Res. 1997;34:175–185.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Cohen RA, Vanhoutte PM. Endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization. Beyond nitric oxide and cGMP. Circulation. 1995;92:3337–3349.[Free Full Text]

21. Deleted in proofs.

22. Hermsmeyer K. Contraction and membrane activation in several mammalian vascular muscles. Life Sci. 1971;10:223–234.

23. Bolton TB. Mechanisms of action of transmitters and other substances on smooth muscle. Physiol Rev. 1979;59:606–718.[Free Full Text]

24. Gokina NI, Bevan RD, Walters CL, Bevan JA. Electrical activity underlying rhythmic contraction in human pial arteries. Circ Res. 1996;78:148–153.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Gokina NI, Wellman TD, Bevan RD, Walters CL, Penar PL, Bevan JA. Role of Ca2+-activated K+ channels in the regulation of membrane potential and tone of smooth muscle in human pial arteries. Circ Res. 1996;79:881–886.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Von der Weid P-Y, Beny J-L. Simultaneous oscillations in the membrane potential of pig coronary artery endothelial and smooth muscle cells. J Physiol (Lond). 1993;471:13–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Ross G, Stinson E, Schroeder J, Ginsburg R. Spontaneous phasic activity of isolated human coronary arteries. Cardiovasc Res. 1980;14:613–618.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Kalsner S. Coronary artery reactivity in human vessels: some questions and some answers. Fed Proc. 1985;44:321–325.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Cowan CL, Cohen RA. Two mechanisms mediate relaxation by bradykinin of pig coronary artery: NO-dependent and -independent responses. Am J Physiol . 1991;261:H830–H835.

30. Nagao T, Vanhoutte PM. Hyperpolarization as a mechanism for endothelium-dependent relaxations in the porcine coronary artery. J Physiol (Lond). 1992;445:355–367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Mombouli J-V, Illiano S, Nagao T, Scott-Burden T, Vanhoutte PM. Potentiation of endothelium-dependent relaxations to bradykinin by angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitors in canine coronary artery involves both endothelium-derived relaxing and hyperpolarizing factors. Circ Res. 1992;71:137–144.

32. Pacicca C, Schaad O, Bény J-L. Electrotonic propagation of kinin-induced, endothelium-dependent hyperpolarizations in pig coronary smooth muscles. J Vasc Res. 1996;33:380–385.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Nagao T, Nakashima M, Smart FW, Bond RA, Morrison KJ, Vanhoutte PM. Potentiation of endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization to serotonin by dietary intake of NC 020, a defined fish oil, in the porcine coronary artery. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1995;26:679–681.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Moncada S, Hermann AG, Vanhoutte PM. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor is identified as nitric oxide. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1987;8:365–368.

35. Vanhoutte PM. The end of the quest? Nature. 1987;327:459–460.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Hecker M, Bara AT, Bauersachs J, Busse R. Characterization of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor as a cytochrome P450-derived arachidonic acid metabolite in mammals. J Physiol (Lond). 1994;481:407–414.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Campbell WB, Gebremedhin D, Pratt PF, Harder DR. Identification of epoxyeicosatrienoic acids as endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factors. Circ Res. 1996;78:415–423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Fang X, Kaduce TL, Weintraub NL, VanRollins M, Spector AA. Functional implications of a newly characterized pathway of 11,12-epoxyeicosatrienoic acid metabolism in arterial smooth muscle. Circ Res. 1996;79:784–793.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Richard V, Tanner FC, Tschudi M, Luscher TF. Different activation of L-arginine pathway by bradykinin, serotonin, and clonidine in coronary arteries. Am J Physiol. 1990;259:H1433–H1439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
L. Luksha, H. Nisell, N. Luksha, M. Kublickas, K. Hultenby, and K. Kublickiene
Endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor in preeclampsia: heterogeneous contribution, mechanisms, and morphological prerequisites
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): R510 - R519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Feletou and P. M. Vanhoutte
Endothelial dysfunction: a multifaceted disorder (The Wiggers Award Lecture)
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2006; 291(3): H985 - H1002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. M. Strotmann, J. Bauersachs, D. Fraccarollo, M. Kirchengast, P. A. Schnabel, J. Sykora, G. Ertl, and W. Voelker
Trauma induced by nontraumatic coronary devices and its impact on vascular reactivity and morphology
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): H2356 - H2362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Huang, D. Sun, E. G. Shesely, E. M. Levee, A. Koller, and G. Kaley
Neuronal NOS-dependent dilation to flow in coronary arteries of male eNOS-KO mice
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2002; 282(2): H429 - H436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. Huang, D. Sun, M. A. Carroll, H. Jiang, C. J. Smith, J. A. Connetta, J. R. Falck, E. G. Shesely, A. Koller, and G. Kaley
EDHF mediates flow-induced dilation in skeletal muscle arterioles of female eNOS-KO mice
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2001; 280(6): H2462 - H2469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
M.-P. Fournet-Bourguignon, M. Castedo-Delrieu, J.-P. Bidouard, S. Leonce, D. Saboureau, I. Delescluse, J.-P. Vilaine, and P. M. Vanhoutte
Phenotypic and Functional Changes in Regenerated Porcine Coronary Endothelial Cells : Increased Uptake of Modified LDL and Reduced Production of NO
Circ. Res., April 28, 2000; 86(8): 854 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. B. Su, R. Houel, F. Heloire, F. Barbe, F. Beverelli, L. Sambin, A. Castaigne, A. Berdeaux, B. Crozatier, and L. Hittinger
Stimulation of Bradykinin B1 Receptors Induces Vasodilation in Conductance and Resistance Coronary Vessels in Conscious Dogs : Comparison With B2 Receptor Stimulation
Circulation, April 18, 2000; 101(15): 1848 - 1853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. L. Dixon, J. D. Stoops, J. L. Parker, M. H. Laughlin, G. A. Weisman, and M. Sturek
Dyslipidemia and Vascular Dysfunction in Diabetic Pigs Fed an Atherogenic Diet
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, December 1, 1999; 19(12): 2981 - 2992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
W. B. Campbell and D. R. Harder
Endothelium-Derived Hyperpolarizing Factors and Vascular Cytochrome P450 Metabolites of Arachidonic Acid in the Regulation of Tone
Circ. Res., March 5, 1999; 84(4): 484 - 488.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
R. Kohler, S. Brakemeier, M. Kuhn, C. Behrens, R. Real, C. Degenhardt, H.-D. Orzechowski, A. R. Pries, M. Paul, and J. Hoyer
Impaired Hyperpolarization in Regenerated Endothelium After Balloon Catheter Injury
Circ. Res., July 20, 2001; 89(2): 174 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thollon, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vilaine, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thollon, C.
Right arrow Articles by Vilaine, J. P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide