Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1999;84:250-252

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Demer, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tintut, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Demer, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tintut, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation
Right arrow Other Vascular biology
(Circulation Research. 1999;84:250-252.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Osteopontin

Between a Rock and a Hard Plaque

Linda L. Demer, Yin Tintut

From the Departments of Medicine and Physiology, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif.

Correspondence to Linda L. Demer, MD, PhD, 47-123 CHS, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1679.


Key Words: osteopontin • vascular disease • smooth muscle cell • calcification

Vascular calcification is widely regarded as merely a rare, end-stage, passive, degenerative, and inevitable process of aging. Decades ago, atherosclerosis had been similarly dismissed, but extensive research finally demonstrated its active regulation. Current research is now revising outdated views of vascular calcification. New imaging techniques made it clear that coronary calcification is neither rare nor end stage but occurs in 90% of patients with coronary artery disease1 and that the vast majority of significant coronary stenoses are calcified.2 Coronary calcification is also associated with increased cardiovascular risk.3 4

One clue to the regenerative—rather than degenerative—nature of vascular calcification is that it often includes histopathological features of bone. In the 1700s, Morgagni and others described arterial ossification in their postmortem examinations: "... the left coronary artery appeared to have been changed into a bony canal from its very origin... . "5 In 1863, Virchow labeled the vascular changes as "ossification, not mere calcification, occurring by the same mechanism by which an osteophyte forms on the surface of bone."6 In 1906, marrow was described within the bone tissue within the arteries—a richly vascularized cellular red marrow containing adipocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils, lymphoid and erythroid cells, reticulocytes, megakaryocytes, and other characteristic elements of marrow.7 Bunting further described (and we have also observed) evidence of resorption by osteoclast-like cells in this tissue. Within the vascular tree, the aorta and cardiac valves are the most common sites of ossification, and these contain all the stages of osteogenesis from the youngest variety of osteoid tissue up to true bone.8 Calcification of cardiac valves also involves lipid deposition and expression of bone matrix proteins.9 Because of various selection bias effects, the ossified form of vascular calcification may be more common than currently believed.10 One pathologist argued that the ossified lesion "is regarded as rare, chiefly because it is not more often searched for."7

The concept that vascular calcification is living tissue undergoing active remodeling suggests that it could be reversed through biological manipulations, in effect, producing osteoporosis locally in the artery wall. In this issue of Circulation Research, Wada et al11 elucidate one of the mechanisms governing vascular calcification that may lead to a therapeutic approach. Using ultrastructural localization and dynamic measurement of mineral deposition, the authors provide strong evidence for the role of the bone matrix protein osteopontin in inhibition of vascular calcification. This dose-dependent inhibition was shown to be most likely due to direct association of osteopontin with growing apatite crystals.

Osteopontin (OPN), an acidic phosphorylated glycoprotein, was named for its function as a bridge between cells and mineral. Forming a proteinaceous coating over the solid crystal surface, OPN mediates attachment of both osteoblasts and osteoclasts to bone mineral through interaction of its highly conserved GRGDS sequence with integrins.12 In cell-free solutions and gels, OPN inhibits apatite crystal formation.13 For this reason, OPN, which is present in urine and other body fluids, is believed to prevent stone formation.

Other bone matrix proteins also inhibit mineralization by blocking growth or delaying nucleation14 and some, such as bone sialoprotein, initiate crystal nucleation. Many of these are also expressed in the artery wall or in atherosclerotic lesions. Osteocalcin (bone gla protein) binds to apatite and is believed to inhibit crystal formation based on in vitro studies and a genetically modified mouse model.15 16 When gamma carboxylated at glutamic acid residues by a vitamin K–dependent carboxylase, osteocalcin binds avidly to bone mineral. A related protein, matrix gla protein (MGP), which contains 5 gamma-carboxyglutamic acid (gla) residues, is also believed to inhibit mineralization, based on a mouse model described later. Some uncertainty remains concerning the function of bone matrix proteins, in that their behavior in cell-free solution or in gel-agarose medium may differ from that in a complex, fibrillar intercellular matrix in which proteins may undergo function-altering configurational changes. The purpose of several proteins, all with the same function—binding to and inhibiting growth of hydroxyapatite mineral—is unclear. One possibility is that the different lattice geometries on the different faces of the mineral crystal have different binding avidity for the different matrix proteins. This geometric selectivity would permit independent control of growth along each of the crystal axes. Thus, genetic regulation of the relative abundance of the various matrix proteins would actually govern crystal shape.

Paradoxically, bone matrix proteins that inhibit apatite formation are found at increased levels in calcified human atherosclerotic plaque and in culture.17 18 One might expect that reduced levels of these factors would be necessary to permit mineralization. One possible explanation is that the inhibitory factors are induced in response to mineralization but that they are outstripped by the mineralization rate. Thus, their expression would be associated with mineralization but not causal.

It was an unexpected observation that stimulated reconsideration of the pathogenesis of vascular calcification. Giachelli et al19 found that OPN expression distinguished pup versus adult smooth muscle cells in subtraction hybridization studies. Together with the prior description of matrix vesicles in calcified human atherosclerotic lesions,20 the possibility arose that the bone-like nature of vascular calcification could be demonstrated at the ultrastructural and molecular levels. Our group hypothesized that vascular calcification recapitulates embryonic osteogenesis at the molecular level and demonstrated expression of the embryonic differentiation factor, bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2, in calcified carotid plaques and in an in vitro model of vascular calcification.21 A stream of reports followed showing bone extracellular matrix proteins in atherosclerotic lesions.17 19 22 23 Further evidence for genetic regulation came from the unexpected demonstration of pervasive endochondral ossification of the aorta and its branches in the matrix gla protein knockout mouse.24

To study the cells in the artery wall that are responsible for producing mineralized matrix, our group isolated from cultures of bovine aortic smooth muscle cells (BASMCs) a minority of clones, termed calcifying vascular cells, that underwent osteoblastic differentiation and mineralization in vitro.21 25 Consistent with this, Wada et al11 found marked heterogeneity in the bone differentiation marker, alkaline phosphatase activity, in their BASMC cultures. This contributes further to the already overwhelming evidence for smooth muscle cell heterogeneity.26 27 28 29 These findings underscore the importance of accounting for the mix of cellular subtypes in studies of smooth muscle cells from the artery wall by immunological characterization or cloning.

Although the mineral produced in culture is the bone mineral hydroxyapatite, it lacks the characteristic features of bone tissue; that is explained by the absence of vascular ingrowth, which is required for fully formed tissue. As would be expected, in atherosclerotic lesions, it is generally accepted that most calcium deposits also lack tissue organization and vascularization. However, absence of full tissue organization at one stage does not exclude a role of osteogenic processes. In the embryo, both types of osteogenesis, intramembranous and endochondral, are preceded by a phase of amorphous crystallization in a cell-free matrix, such as calcified cartilage. Bone structures, including osteons, Haversian canals, lacunae, and canaliculi form later, only after angiogenic invasion. Indeed, bone structures are found in the artery wall only where vessels interface with calcium deposits.7 These observations strongly suggest that the nonbone form represents an early stage of ossification.

Whether arterial ossification is common is not the key issue. That it occurs at all is extraordinary. Such transformation of tissue raises questions about cell identity determination, terminal differentiation, and the possibility of pluripotent mesenchymal stem cells in vascular tissue. If arterial cells can form bone, can arteries and other connective tissues be used to produce replacement tissue? The hypothesis that embryonic connective tissue stem cells remain in adult tissues is gaining acceptance,30 particularly with regard to the marrow stroma. Indeed, our "calcifying vascular cells" may represent mesenchymal progenitor cells with pluripotentiality one hierarchical level below that of marrow stromal cells on the basis of their apparent lack of adipogenic potential.

The findings of Wada et al11 may lead to consideration of OPN as a soluble inhibitor of mineralization as a long-term possibility. Yet, other functions of osteopontin must not be forgotten. On the basis of findings in the OPN knockout mouse, its role in wound healing may go beyond its role in bone formation.31 OPN is even regarded as the culprit in other disease contexts, such as hepatic fibrosis, for which OPN inhibitors may be considered potential therapeutic agents.

Footnotes

The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.

References

1. Agatston A, Janowitz W, Hildner F, Zusmer N, Viamonte M, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:827–832.[Abstract]

2. Honye J, Mahon D, Jain A, White C, Ramee S, Wallis J, Al-Zarka A, Tobis J. Morphological effects of coronary balloon angioplasty in vivo assessed by intravascular ultrasound imaging. Circulation. 1992;85:1012–1025.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Arad Y, Spadaro L, Goodman K, Lledo-Perez A, Sherman S, Lerner G, Guerci A. Predictive value of electron beam computed tomography of the coronary arteries. Circulation. 1996;93:1951–1953.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Margolis J, Chen J, Kong Y, Peter R, Behar V, Kisslo J. The diagnostic and prognostic significance of coronary artery calcification: a report of 800 cases. Radiology. 1980;137:609–616.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Morgagni D. De sedibus et causis morborum per anatomen indagatis. Venice, Italy: Ex Typographia Remondiana; 1761. Cited by: Bing R. Coronary circulation and cardiac metabolism. In: Fishman A, Richards D, eds. Circulation of the Blood: Men and Ideas. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1964:199–264.

6. Virchow R. Cellular Pathology: As Based Upon Physiological and Pathological Histology. New York, NY: Dover; 1971.

7. Bunting C. The formation of true bone with cellular (red) marrow in a sclerotic aorta. J Exp Med. 1906;8:365–376.

8. Buergher L, Oppenheimer A. Bone formation in sclerotic arteries. J Exp Med. 1908;10:354–367.

9. O'Brien K, Kuusisto J, Reichenbach D, Ferguson M, Giachelli C, Alpers C, Otto C. Osteopontin is expressed in human aortic valvular lesions. Circulation. 1995;92:2163–2168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Demer L. A skeleton in the atherosclerosis closet. Circulation. 1995;92:2029–2032.[Free Full Text]

11. Wada T, McKee MD, Steitz S, Giachelli CM. Calcification of vascular smooth muscle cell cultures: inhibition by osteopontin. Circ Res. 1999;84:166–178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. McKee MD, Nanci A. Osteopontin at mineralized tissue interfaces in bone, teeth, and osseointegrated implants: ultrastructural distribution and implications for mineralized tissue formation, turnover, and repair. Microsc Res Tech. 1996;33:141–164.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Hoyer JR, Otvos L Jr, Urge L. Osteopontin in urinary stone formation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1995;760:257–265.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Hunter GK, Kyle CL, Goldberg HA. Modulation of crystal formation by bone phosphoproteins: structural specificity of the osteopontin-mediated inhibition of hydroxyapatite formation. Biochem J. 1994;300:723–728.

15. Young MF, Kerr J, Ibaraki K, Heegaard AM, Robey PG. Structure, expression and regulation of the major noncollagenous matrix proteins of bone. Clin Orthop. 1992;281:275–294.

16. Boskey AL, Gadaleta S, Gundberg C, Doty SB, Ducy P, Karsenty G. Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopic analysis of bones of osteocalcin-deficient mice provides insight into the function of osteocalcin. Bone. 1998;23:187–196.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Shanahan C, Cary N, Metcalfe J, Weissberg P. High expression of genes for calcification-regulating proteins in human atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:2393–2402.

18. Proudfoot D, Skepper JN, Shanahan CM, Weissberg PL. Calcification of human vascular cells in vitro is correlated with high levels of matrix gla protein and low levels of osteopontin expression. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:379–388.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Giachelli C, Bae N, Lombardi D, Majesky M, Schwartz S. Molecular cloning and characterization of 2B7, a rat mRNA which distinguishes smooth muscle cell phenotypes in vitro and is identical to osteopontin (secreted phosphoprotein I, 2aR). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;177:867–873.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Anderson H. Calcific disease: a concept. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1983;107:341–348.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Boström K, Watson K, Horn S, Wortham C, Herman I, Demer L. Bone morphogenetic protein expression in human atherosclerotic lesions. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:1800–1809.

22. Hirota S, Imakita M, Kohri K, Ito A, Morii E, Adachi S, Kim H, Kitamura Y, Yutani C, Nomura S. Expression of osteopontin messenger RNA by macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques. A possible association with calcification. Am J Pathol. 1993;143:1003–1008.[Abstract]

23. O'Brien ER, Garvin MR, Stewart DK, Hinohara T, Simpson JB, Schwartz SM, Giachelli CM. Osteopontin is synthesized by macrophage, smooth muscle, and endothelial cells in primary and restenotic human coronary atherosclerotic plaques. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;14:1648–1656.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Luo G, Ducy P, McKee M, Pinero G, Loyer E, Behringer R, Karsenty G. Spontaneous calcification of arteries and cartilage in mice lacking matrix GLA protein. Nature. 1997;385:78–81.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Watson KE, Boström K, Ravindranath R, Lam T, Norton B, Demer LL. TGF-ß1 and 25-hydroxycholesterol stimulate osteoblast-like vascular cells to calcify. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:2106–2113.

26. Benzakour O, Kanthou C, Kanse SM, Scully MF, Kakkar VV, Cooper DN. Evidence for cultured human vascular smooth muscle cell heterogeneity: isolation of clonal cells and study of their growth characteristics. Thromb Haemost. 1996;75:854–858.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Bochaton-Piallat ML, Ropraz P, Gabbiani F, Gabbiani G. Phenotypic heterogeneity of rat arterial smooth muscle cell clones. Implications for the development of experimental intimal thickening. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:815–820.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Frid MG, Dempsey EC, Durmowicz AG, Stenmark KR. Smooth muscle cell heterogeneity in pulmonary and systemic vessels. Importance in vascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:1203–1209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Zanellato AM, Borrione AC, Tonello M, Scannapieco G, Pauletto P, Sartore S. Myosin isoform expression and smooth muscle cell heterogeneity in normal and atherosclerotic rabbit aorta. Arteriosclerosis. 1990;10:996–1009.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Prockop D. Marrow stromal cells as stem cells for nonhematopoietic tissues. Science. 1997;276:71–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Liaw L, Birk DE, Ballas CB, Whitsitt JS, Davidson JM, Hogan BL. Altered wound healing in mice lacking a functional osteopontin gene (spp1). J Clin Invest. 1998;101:1468–1478.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
D. Proudfoot, J. N. Skepper, L. Hegyi, M. R. Bennett, C. M. Shanahan, and P. L. Weissberg
Apoptosis Regulates Human Vascular Calcification In Vitro : Evidence for Initiation of Vascular Calcification by Apoptotic Bodies
Circ. Res., November 24, 2000; 87(11): 1055 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Demer, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tintut, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Demer, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Tintut, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Smooth muscle proliferation and differentiation
Right arrow Other Vascular biology