Mini Review |
From the NHLI Division (P.H.S.) and Division of Biomedical Sciences (A.C.), Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK.
Correspondence to Peter H. Sugden, D Phil, NHLI Division (Cardiac Medicine), Imperial College School of Medicine, Dovehouse Street, London SW3 6LY, UK. E-mail p.sugden{at}ic.ac.uk
Key Words: cardioprotection mitogen-activated protein kinase cellular stress G proteincoupled receptor hypertrophy/apoptosis
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Cascades: Terminology and Properties
The best-characterized subfamilies of the
mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) superfamily are the
extracellularly responsive kinases (ERKs) and the two
"stress-responsive" MAPK subfamilies, namely, the c-Jun N-terminal
kinases (JNKs) and the p38-MAPKs.1 2 3 4 5 As yet, no
single nomenclature has been determined, and the synonyms currently in
use are summarized in Table 1
. The ERK
cascade is the most thoroughly studied of the MAPK cascades, and it is
activated principally by G proteincoupled receptor (GPCR)
agonists in cardiac myocytes. We have reviewed this topic
recently,6 and we will not discuss it in any
depth here. The regulation of the JNK and p38-MAPK cascades in the
myocardium (Figure 1
) forms
the principal subject of this review.
|
|
An ever-increasing number of isoforms of MAPKs are being characterized,
displaying varying degrees of homology to one another. At least ten
JNKs, derived from alternative splicing of three genes, have been
identified.7 The predicted molecular masses of
these isoforms are
46 or 54 kDa, depending on the absence or
presence of a C-terminal extension, and activities migrating in these
positions on SDS-PAGE are clearly detectable in adult rat hearts and in
primary cultures of cardiac myocytes prepared from neonatal rat
ventricles.8 9 It is not clear which of the
individual isoforms are present in the myocardium,
although a JNK1 antibody immunoprecipitates almost all of the 46-kDa
activity and a proportion of the 54-kDa
activity.10 Six p38-MAPK isoforms have been
cloned: the alternatively spliced
p38-MAPK(
1/
2)11
and
p38-MAPKß1/ß212
isoforms, p38-MAPK
,13 14 and
p38-MAPK
15 16 . The levels of p38-MAPK
and
p38-MAPK
transcripts in human heart cDNA libraries are low compared
with those of p38-MAPK(
) and p38-MAPKß,16
but it is not yet clear whether these patterns are reflected in the
abundances of the proteins.
MAPKs are the final components of three-membered protein kinase
cascades (Figure 1
). They are activated by the dual
phosphorylation of a Thr-Xaa-Tyr motif (to
PThr-Xaa-PTyr) catalyzed by dual-specificity MAPK
kinases (MKKs), and membership of a given MAPK subfamily can be
assigned on the basis of the identity of the Xaa residue (Table 1
).
Several stress-responsive MKKs (Table 2
and Figure 1
) that show some selectivity for specific MAPKs have been
identified.3 5 The novel MKK,
MKK7,17 is selective for the JNKs, whereas MKK3
and MKK6 activate the p38-MAPKs. MKK4 was first identified as
an activator of JNKs but will also stimulate p38-MAPKs. The
stress-responsive MKKs are themselves probably
phosphorylated and activated by MKK kinases
(Figure 1
). The MKK kinases (MKKKs) for the JNK and p38-MAPK cascades
have not been fully characterized but may include minimally four (or
five)18 MEKKs (for MEK [or ERK] kinase) and
other protein kinases.19 The mechanism of
activation of these MKKKs is not clear. As in the ERK cascade, small G
proteins of the Ras superfamily (Ras, Rac1, and Cdc42) have been
implicated. These may activate protein kinases such as
p21-activated kinases and mixed-lineage
kinases,3 19 20 which may then activate
the JNK and p38-MAPK cascades.
|
Substrates and Inhibitors of Stress-Responsive MAPKs
All MAPKs phosphorylate Ser-/Thr- residues in proteins within a (Ser-/Thr-)Pro consensus motif, but additional factors govern the precise substrate specificity. Substrates of the JNKs and p38-MAPKs include the bZip transcription factors, c-Jun and ATF2, and the ternary complex factor transcription factors, Elk1. All are phosphorylated in their transactivation domains to increase their transactivating activities. c-Jun and ATF2 form heterodimers that transactivate at cAMP response element (CRE)-like consensus sequences within a variety of gene promoter regions (including that for c-jun itself). Elk1 upregulates c-fos expression in conjunction with the serum response factor acting at the serum response element consensus sequence, although phosphorylation of neither this transcription factor nor related ternary complex factors, such as Sap1a, has yet been studied in detail in the heart. The CRE-like and serum response element consensus elements may be involved in the upregulation of c-jun and c-fos expression seen in cultured cardiac myocytes under a variety of conditions (eg, the responses to hypertrophic agonists, stretch, and metabolic and ischemia/reperfusion stresses).21 22 23 24 25 c-Jun also forms heterodimers with c-Fos to transactivate at activator protein-1 (AP-1)like sites,26 which are present in many gene promoter regions.
Although ERKs were shown originally to phosphorylate c-Jun
in vitro at two sites (Ser-63 and Ser-73) in the N-terminal
transactivation domain, it subsequently became clear that c-Jun is
preferentially phosphorylated at these sites by
JNKs.26 These kinases are probably exclusively
responsible for the phosphorylation of c-Jun in vivo.
Two other sites in the N-terminal region of c-Jun (Thr-91 and Thr-93)
are also phosphorylated by the JNKs, but the role of
these phosphorylations is
obscure.27 ATF2 represents a second
transcription factor phosphorylated by JNKs and
p38-MAPKs. It contains three phosphorylation sites
within its transactivation domain (Thr-69, Thr-71, and
Ser-90),28 although Ser-90 is not directly
involved in transactivation.28 ATF2 may be
preferentially phosphorylated by p38-MAPK
and/or
p38-MAPK
in vitro,12 15 and there is evidence
that the three sites may be differentially
phosphorylated by the
p38-MAPKs.29 The kinases involved in ATF2
phosphorylation in vivo have yet to be clearly
identified,5 but both c-Jun and ATF2 are clearly
phosphorylated in cultured cardiac myocytes in response
to stresses.30 p38-MAPK also
phosphorylates the transcription factors MEF2C and
CHOP10/GADD153.5 The regulation of these
transcription factors has not yet been studied in cardiac myocytes.
Although the only substrates of JNKs so far identified are
transcription factors, p38-MAPKs phosphorylate and
activate other protein kinases. These include Mnk1 and Mnk2,
which may regulate the activity of the translational initiation factor
eIF4E.31 32 p38-MAPK(
) and p38-MAPKß also
phosphorylate two homologous protein kinases,
MAPK-activated protein kinases 2 and 3 (MAPKAPK2 and
MAPKAPK3).12 The presence and activation of
MAPKAPK2 has been clearly demonstrated in the
heart.9 33 34 MAPKAPK2 and MAPKAPK3 have
overlapping substrate specificities, and both phosphorylate
the small heat-shock protein Hsp25/2735 to
increase its cytoprotective activity, an action that involves
stabilization of the actin cytoskeleton.36
MAPKAPK2 may also directly regulate the activity of transcription
factors (eg, CRE binding protein).5
Two relatively specific chemical inhibitors of
p38-MAPK(
) and p38-MAPKß, SB203580 and
SB202190,11 12 15 29 37 have been identified, and
these are being increasingly used to identify biological substrates of
these p38-MAPKs.5 Caution should be exercised
because at the concentrations normally used (
10 µmol/L),
SB203580 inhibits recombinant JNK2 in vitro38 and
at least two JNK isoforms in the heart.39
Examining the concentration dependence of inhibition can assist in
establishing the involvement of p38-MAPKs, since inhibition should be
clearly demonstrable at <1 µmol/L. There are as yet no chemical
inhibitors that are selective for the JNKs. However,
expression plasmids encoding the JNK interacting protein, which
inhibits the stimulation of gene expression by activated
JNKs,40 may prove useful in transfection
experiments.
Activation of JNKs and p38-MAPKs in the Myocardium by Cellular Stresses
As might be predicted from studies in other systems, cellular
stresses such as hyperosmotic shock, low concentrations of protein
synthesis inhibitors (eg, anisomycin),
hypoxia/reoxygenation, and reactive oxygen
species (ROS) activate the JNKs in cultured cardiac
myocytes.8 41 42 43 44 The JNKs are also
activated by the proinflammatory cytokines,
interleukin-1ß and tumor necrosis factor-
.41
The activation of p38-MAPKs in myocytes has not been as fully
characterized, but these MAPKs are activated by the cellular
stresses that have been examined (ROS,44 45
hypoxia/reoxygenation,43
hyperosmotic shock,46
arsenite,47 and proinflammatory
cytokines; authors' unpublished data, 1998). Activation
of p38-MAPK by cellular stresses is associated with activation of
MAPKAPK2 and the phosphorylation and disaggregation of
Hsp25/27.44 There is minimal information on the
upstream mechanisms of activation of the JNKs and p38-MAPKs in
myocytes, although
PAK is activated by hyperosmotic stress
and hypoxia/reoxygenation but not by
interleukin-1ß or endothelin-1 (ET-1).43 48
Probably the most pathologically relevant forms of cardiac stress in
vivo are ischemia and ischemia/reperfusion, and it is
clear that these stresses powerfully activate the
stress-responsive MAPKs in the intact isolated rat heart. p38-MAPK(s)
and MAPKAPK2 are activated during ischemia, and their
activation is sustained or increased during
reperfusion.9 25 The activation of MAPKAPK2 is
completely inhibited by SB203580, implicating particularly
p38-MAPK(
) and/or p38-MAPKß in its activation in the
heart.10 In contrast, the JNKs are not
activated during global ischemia but are strongly
activated during the reperfusion
phase.9 25 49 This differential activation of the
JNKs and p38-MAPKs is unexpected, because in most systems the two
pathways tend to be activated in parallel.
As mentioned above, JNKs and p38-MAPKs phosphorylate c-Jun and ATF2 to increase the transactivating activity of c-Jun/ATF2 heterodimers, and both are phosphorylated in cultured cardiac myocytes subjected to cellular stresses.30 The c-jun promoter contains two CRE-like sequences that bind c-Jun/ATF2. The promoter for ATF3, the gene encoding another transcription factor, contains one such site. After ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery, c-jun and ATF3 expression is increased in the ischemic zone.25 On reperfusion, the expression becomes ubiquitous.25 It is probable that phosphorylation and activation of c-Jun/ATF2 by JNKs and p38-MAPKs is involved in the upregulation of these genes after ischemia and ischemia/reperfusion.
What might be the mediators for the activation of JNKs and p38-MAPKs
during ischemia and/or ischemia/reperfusion in the
isolated heart? Numerous biochemical changes occur within the heart
under these conditions, including increased oxidative stress and
production of ROS, changes in ion (eg, H+
and Ca2+) homeostasis and energy/fuel
metabolism, decreases in intracellular concentrations of
ATP and creatine phosphate, degradation of adenine
nucleotides to adenosine and other nucleosides, and
osmotic disturbances. Oxidative stress, as exemplified by low
concentrations of H2O2,
activates JNKs, p38-MAPK, and MAPKAPK2 in perfused
hearts.10 Although the particular species may
differ, many studies have shown that ROS are formed during
ischemia and on subsequent reperfusion (eg, see References 50
and 5150 51 ). For example, in chick embryo cardiac myocytes, superoxide
anion and H2O2 are produced
during simulated ischemia, whereas OH· and
H2O2 are produced during
simulated reperfusion.51 The formation of any
single ROS will generate other species (eg, OH· from
H2O2 by the Fenton
reaction). The lipophilic spin trap
N-tert-butyl-
-phenyl nitrone prevents
activation of p38-MAPK during ischemia, whereas DMSO (an OH·
scavenger) diminishes the activation of JNKs and p38-MAPKs in
reperfused hearts, suggesting that the various ROS may differentially
activate the stress-responsive MAPKs.10
Similarly, antioxidants inhibit the activation of JNKs in cultured
cardiac myocytes subjected to
hypoxia/reoxygenation42 ;
conversely, depletion of intracellular glutathione increases the
activation of JNKs in cells subjected to oxidative
stress.42 These findings suggest that ROS are at
least in part responsible for the activation of JNKs and p38-MAPKs
during ischemia and ischemia/reperfusion. The situation
is more complex in vivo, where an inflammatory response is likely to be
triggered stimulating the release of proinflammatory cytokines,
which may also activate cardiac stress-responsive MAPKs.
Activation of JNKs and p38-MAPKs in the Myocardium by GPCR Agonists
GPCR agonists such as ET-1,8 the
-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine
(PE),8 52 and angiotensin II (Ang
II)53 activate JNKs in cultured
cardiac myocytes, although this activation is considerably less than
that obtained with cellular stresses (such as hyperosmotic shock or the
protein synthesis inhibitor,
anisomycin).8 Likewise, p38-MAPK and MAPKAPK2 are
activated by ET-1 and PE, and this leads to
phosphorylation of Hsp25/27.46
ET-1 and PE stimulate the phosphorylation of c-Jun and
ATF2 in cultured cardiac myocytes,54 presumably
through the JNKs and p38-MAPKs. In the intact perfused rat heart, the
JNKs, p38-MAPK, and MAPKAPK2 are activated by
PE.55 Mechanical stresses (passive
stretch56 and electrical
pacing57 ) activate JNKs in cultured
cardiac myocytes. The effects of stretch on p38-MAPK and MAPKAPK2
activities in cardiac myocytes have not yet been studied, but
increasing wall stress in the intact heart by perfusion at
"hypertensive" pressure activates p38-MAPK, MAPKAPK2, and
the JNKs.10 There is evidence that stretch causes
the release of Ang II and/or ET-1 from
cells,58 59 and these may have an
autocrine/paracrine effect to stimulate JNKs and p38-MAPKs.
An important signaling pathway for ET-1, PE, and Ang II is their GqPCR-mediated stimulation of phosphoinositide hydrolysis and activation of the diacylglycerol-regulated isoforms of protein kinase C (PKC). The pharmacological activator of the diacylglycerol-regulated PKCs, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), is only a weak activator of JNKs and p38-MAPK in cultured cardiac myocytes.8 46 However, PMA synergizes with the Ca2+ ionophore A23187 to increase JNK activity, and chelation of intracellular Ca2+ inhibits JNK activation by Ang II.53 Downregulation of diacylglycerol-regulated PKC isoforms inhibits activation of JNKs by Ang II53 and p38-MAPK/MAPKAPK2 by ET-1.46 The PKC-selective inhibitor, GF109203X, also inhibits activation of p38-MAPK and MAPKAPK2 by ET-1.46 These data implicate PKC in the activation of JNKs and p38-MAPK by GPCR agonists, although they also suggest that stimulation of PKC alone is not sufficient for full activation.
Stress-Responsive MAPKs and Hypertrophy of the Cardiac Myocyte
The hypertrophic response of the myocardium is an important pathophysiological adaptation that is associated with alterations in gene expression and cell morphology (increased sarcomeric assembly and myocyte profile).21 ET-1, PE, and PMA are powerful hypertrophic agonists in cultured cardiac myocytes. It was suggested in 1993 that activation of the ERK cascade by these agonists may mediate the hypertrophic response.60 Although there is considerable evidence that the ERKs participate in myocyte hypertrophy,61 it is now apparent that ERKs are not the sole mediators of this response.62 63 64 Indeed, some investigators believe that they may even be inhibitory.62 64 65 Because GPCR agonists are now known to activate JNKs and p38-MAPKs, the role(s) of these pathways in hypertrophy is under investigation.
Stress-Responsive MAPK Cascades and Hypertrophy
Transfection of neonatal cardiac myocytes with constructs for
constitutively active MEKK1 (an MKKK that preferentially
activates the JNK cascade) in the presence or absence of MKK4
stimulates expression of atrial natriuretic factor (ANF),
ß-myosin heavy chain, and skeletal muscle
-actin.9 52 65 This pattern of gene expression
is associated with hypertrophy in the
rat.21 MEKK1 in combination with MKK4 increases
the myocyte profile but does not induce the myofibrillar organization
that typifies a true hypertrophic response.9
Transfection of a construct for inhibitory
("dominant-negative") MEKK1 inhibits PE-induced ANF expression,
suggesting that the JNK pathway may be necessary for ANF gene
upregulation.52 65 This construct also attenuates
the stimulation of c-Juntransactivating activity by PE, establishing
a potential link through MEKK1 and JNKs to
transcription.52 These experiments are not
necessarily unequivocal; although MEKK1 may activate the JNK
cascade preferentially, it also activates ERKs and p38-MAPK in
cultured cardiac myocytes.65 66 However, a
dominant-negative JNK construct inhibits PE-induced ANF
expression,65 further implicating the JNK cascade
in the hypertrophic response.
Recently, p38-MAPK has been proposed to effect cardiac
hypertrophy. Transfection of neonatal cardiac myocytes with
constitutively activated MKK3 or MKK6, both of which
preferentially activate p38-MAPKs, stimulates expression of ANF
and skeletal muscle
-actin and increases cell profile and
myofibrillar assembly.66 67 MKK6 increases
p38-MAPK activity but does not stimulate ERKs or
JNKs.66 It was consistently more
effective than activated c-Raf (which activates only
the ERK cascade) or activated MEKK1 in inducing the
transcriptional and morphological changes associated with
hypertrophy.66 In that study (Zechner
et al66 ), PE induced the
phosphorylation of both p38-MAPKs and ERKs (but
confusingly not the JNKs) and, as expected, stimulated a hypertrophic
response. The hypertrophic responses induced by PE, MKK3, or MKK6 are
reduced by p38-MAPK(
)/p38-MAPKß
inhibitors.66 67 However, the
involvement of p38-MAPKs in cardiac hypertrophy may not be
simple. Constitutively activated MKK3 diminishes cell survival,
and cotransfection experiments (with p38-MAPK(
) and p38-MAPKß
constructs show that this effect is primarily dependent on
p38-MAPK(
).67 In contrast, the hypertrophic
action of MKK3 appears to be primarily mediated by p38-MAPKß. To
confuse matters, a recent study from the same group (Wang et
al68 ) shows selective activation of JNKs and
induction of hypertrophy in cultured cardiac myocytes by
transfected wild-type or constitutively activated MKK7. This
group of investigators now appears to propose a role for JNKs in
stimulating hypertrophy and a role for p38-MAPKs in
promoting cell death.
Most of the data relating to the hypertrophic response have been
obtained in myocytes after 48 hours of transfection or agonist
stimulation. We have examined in more detail the time course of
development of the morphological changes associated with PE or
ET-1induced hypertrophy in cultured cardiac
myocytes.46 Our results indicate that increases
in cell profile and myofibrillar organization are apparent from as
early as 4 hours of stimulation and that inhibition of
p38-MAPK(
)/p38-MAPKß with SB203580 has no effect on these changes
over the first 24 hours.46 However, although
cells stimulated with PE or ET-1 retain their hypertrophic morphology
at 48 hours, cells stimulated with either agonist in the presence of
SB203580 appear smaller, with no sarcomeric structure and minimal
immunostaining for ß-myosin heavy chain. This
suggests that rather than initiating the hypertrophic response,
activation of p38-MAPK by PE or ET-1 may be more important in its
maintenance over a longer period of time. Furthermore, over the
48-hour period, control cells cultured in serum-free conditions
regress, becoming progressively smaller46 and
undergoing apoptosis.69 These data
suggest that studies of apparent hypertrophy after 48 hours
may instead reflect cell survival.
Small G Proteins and Hypertrophy
Small G proteins (eg, Ras, Rac, and Cdc42) are active in their
GTP-ligated state and are implicated upstream from the MAPK cascades.
PE increases Ras.GTP loading in cultured cardiac
myocytes,52 transfection with constitutively
activated Ras induces a hypertrophic
response,70 and transgenic mice that express
activated Ras in the heart develop cardiac
hypertrophy.71 Ras may be involved in
the activation of several signaling pathways (Figure 1
). It has been
known for several years that the ERK cascade is activated by
Ras.GTP in many cells, including cultured cardiac
myocytes.66 Ras has more recently been implicated
in the activation of the JNK cascade,19 and
transfection of a construct for constitutively activated Ras
activates JNKs in cultured cardiac myocytes in the hands of
some investigators.52 However, in another study,
constitutively activated Ras failed to activate either
JNKs or p38-MAPKs.66 Clarification of these
discordant data is necessary.
Other small G proteins of the Rho subfamily (Rac and Cdc42) have been implicated in the activation of the stress-responsive MAPKs in many cell types.19 20 Transfection of cultured cardiac myocytes with constitutively activated Rac selectively increases JNK activity and has some hypertrophic effects.66 RhoA itself has been excluded from the activation of stress-responsive MAPKs in most cell types,19 20 but transfection of myocytes with constitutively activated RhoA stimulates expression of ANF, and inhibition of RhoA activity prevents the hypertrophic response to PE.65 72 73 How RhoA relates to the various signaling pathways governing the response of myocytes to PE remains to be determined. These findings suggest that an examination of the role of various recently discovered Rho-activated protein kinases in myocyte hypertrophy might be productive.
General Overview of Stress-Responsive MAPKs and
Hypertrophy
Many of the studies seeking to establish a role for MAPKs in
cardiac hypertrophy have used transfection protocols,
occasionally in combination with measurements of MAPK activities. The
usual methodology involves transfection of a fusion gene in which the
promoter region of a "marker gene" of cardiac
hypertrophy (eg, ANF) is fused with a reporter construct
(eg, firefly luciferase). Expression vectors encoding activated
or inhibitory signaling intermediates (eg, MEKK1) are
cotransfected, and the expression of luciferase activity is taken as an
index of transcriptional activation. From the preceding discussion, it
is clear that transfection experiments produce often divergent or
contradictory data, leading to much confusion. There are many potential
reasons for this. The precise methodologies used by different groups
vary, and the varying degrees of overexpression of the
"transfected" signaling intermediates may produce different
effects. It is particularly difficult to assess the degree of
overexpression at the low transfection efficiencies in experiments that
have used nonviral expression vectors. Here, there is not even
universal agreement concerning the necessity for or the optimum method
of normalization of data. Some of these problems may be avoided by the
use of adenoviral vectors where the transfection efficiency approaches
100%. However, it should be realized that the "readout" (ie,
luciferase activity in this example) represents the net result
of several processes (eg, transcription, processing and nuclear export
of mRNA, mRNA stability, and protein synthesis and degradation), all of
which may be modulated by the invoked signaling intermediate.
Furthermore, the specific activities of the constitutively
activated mutant signaling intermediates may differ from those
of the activated wild-type proteins, and substrate specificity
may be widened when kinases of MAPK cascades are overexpressed in
transfection experiments. Broadened substrate specificity is a
recognized problem in analogous experiments in vitro at
unphysiological concentrations or ratios of enzymes
and substrates. In some cases, experiments have used constructs
encoding kinases rendered constitutively active by deletion of
regulatory sequences (eg, MEKK19 52 ). Such
deletions could unavoidably remove domains that determine substrate
specificity and interaction. There are also problems with the use of
dominant-negative constructs and/or "selective" chemical
inhibitors, since these reagents may not be as specific as
is assumed. Finally, it is becoming clear from work with other systems
that transcription from transiently transfected plasmids, for example,
and from genomic DNA is regulated differently. This reflects the
additional complexities of organization in the latter.
In studies of hypertrophy in which MAPK activation has been
examined (either in response to agonists or in transfection
experiments), the degree of activation of MAPKs is often ignored. For
example, it is difficult to assess the significance of a 2-fold
activation of JNKs by PE8 52 to the overall
hypertrophic response, when cellular stresses (which do not stimulate
hypertrophy) increase JNK activity by
20-fold.8 It may be argued in this instance
that the additional activation of the p38-MAPK cascade by stresses
leads instead to cell death, but it is apparent that GPCR agonists such
as PE also activate p38-MAPKs.46 Equally,
PMA is strongly hypertrophic21 but only weakly
activates JNKs or p38-MAPKs.8 46 The only
real conclusion from the myriad data is that activation of any one MAPK
pathway may produce a partial hypertrophic response, and it is now
clear that these data must be considered within the additional context
of cell survival.46 67 68 Finally, it is tempting
to speculate that a single signaling pathway may play a dominant role
in cardiac hypertrophy. Although this may indeed be the
case for pharmacological stimuli that produce a prolonged powerful
activation of a single MAPK pathway (eg, PMA and the ERK
cascade74 ), the in vivo response with
physiological agonists is probably much more
complex and probably involves signal integration from multiple
pathways.
Stress-Responsive MAPKs and Apoptosis
The JNKs and p38-MAPKs have been implicated in cell
death/apoptosis in other cell types, but studies of this type
in the heart are still in their infancy. Proinflammatory
cytokines and ROS (which activate the stress-responsive
MAPKs10 41 45 ) induce apoptosis in
cultured cardiac myocytes.45 75 DNA laddering (an
event associated with apoptosis) can be detected in cardiac
myocytes cultured in serum-free conditions69 and
in ischemic hearts that have been perfused for long
periods.25 Although transfection experiments have
implicated p38-MAPK(
) in cardiac myocyte
apoptosis,67 the association between
stress-responsive MAPK activation and cardiac myocyte
death/apoptosis has yet to be proved, but it remains an
interesting possibility.
Ischemic Preconditioning
A brief period of sublethal ischemia protects the heart
against subsequent, more severe ischemia (ischemic
preconditioning).76 77 There are two phases, an
acute phase in which the heart is protected for a few hours and a
so-called "second window of protection," which appears after 24 to
36 hours and may involve transcriptional upregulation. Because of its
immense therapeutic potential, the signaling pathways underlying
ischemic preconditioning are under intense investigation.
However, most investigations have merely attempted to simulate or
inhibit the preconditioning phenomenon with a battery of agonists or
inhibitors. What is tantamount to an ischemic
preconditioning protocol leads to activation of JNKs and p38-MAPKs in
perfused hearts.9 25 49 We have suggested that an
examination of the involvement of these kinases in ischemic
preconditioning might be fruitful,9 particularly
since activation of p38-MAPK should lead to
phosphorylation of Hsp25/27 and increase its
cytoprotective capacity. Such studies are under way in a number of
laboratories. In a recent report, the phosphorylation
of p38-MAPK was examined in rabbit hearts over a 30-minute period of
ischemia that followed a 5-minute preconditioning
ischemia.78 After some manipulation, the
results suggest that phosphorylation of p38-MAPK is
seen during the 30-minute ischemic period only after a
preceding preconditioning ischemia. In isolated rabbit
myocytes, SB203580 prevents simulated "preconditioning" (assessed
by the ability of myocytes to exclude trypan blue), and anisomycin,
which activates stress-responsive MAPKs, can induce
preconditioning.78 Although it is still
controversial,79 a considerable body of evidence
has implicated PKC in preconditioning.76 77 Thus,
many agonists that induce preconditioning (eg, bradykinin,
1-adrenergic agonists, ET-1, purinergic
agonists, PMA, and diacylglycerol) activate PKC, and
inhibitors of PKC attenuate ischemic
preconditioning. Our recent data show that p38-MAPK is
activated by ET-1 and PE in a PKC-dependent
manner,46 providing a possible link between PKC
and p38-MAPK, a connection that could be particularly relevant to
ischemic preconditioning. Equally, the involvement of PKC in
GqPCR-mediated activation of the
JNKs53 may be significant in this respect. In the
next few years, we are likely to see considerable advances in
understanding the intracellular signaling mechanisms involved in
ischemic preconditioning.
General Conclusions
Much of the basic work involving the regulation of JNKs and
p38-MAPKs has been carried out in noncardiomyocytic cells (eg,
fibroblasts), but the area has immense potential significance in the
myocardium with respect to its reactions to pathological
stresses (eg, hypoxia, ischemia, reperfusion injury,
hypertension, and inflammatory disease) (see Figure 2
). The regulation of the
stress-responsive MAPKs in the heart is currently being intensively
investigated, but the biological consequences of their activation and
inhibition in the heart are still unclear. It is likely that these will
become clearer over the next few years and that the stress-responsive
MAPK cascades may prove to be targets that are suitable for
pharmacological manipulation.
|
Note Added in Proof
Nemoto et al (Nemoto S, Sheng Z, Lin A. Opposing effects of Jun
kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase on cardiomyocyte
hypertrophy. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:35183526) have also
recently found that activation of the p38-MAPK cascade stimulates ANF
expression and that chemical inhibition of the cascade prevents the
morphological changes induced by hypertrophic agonists at 48 hours.
Somewhat surprisingly in view of the work of
others,9 52 65 68 activation of the JNK cascade inhibits
MEKK1-stimulated ANF expression.
Acknowledgments
Our work in relation to this topic was supported primarily by the British Heart Foundation and the Wellcome Trust. Because of space limitations, many of the original articles cited refer specifically to the myocardium, and we have used reviews for the more basic information where possible. We apologize to investigators whose background articles on MAPKs have not been cited.
Received March 16, 1998; accepted May 14, 1998.
References
: a new member of the p38 group of MAP kinases.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996;228:334340.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:3012230128.
(
PAK) by hyperosmotic shock in neonatal
ventricular myocytes. FEBS Lett. 1997;403:2325.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
1-adrenergic receptor and ras activation and
is associated with in vitro and in vivo cardiac
hypertrophy. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:1405714061.
q and
1-adrenergic receptor signaling in
cardiomyocytes: dissociation of Ras and Rho pathways.
J Biol Chem. 1996;271:3118531190.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. F. Giani, M. M. Gironacci, M. C. Munoz, D. Turyn, and F. P. Dominici Angiotensin-(1-7) has a dual role on growth-promoting signalling pathways in rat heart in vivo by stimulating STAT3 and STAT5a/b phosphorylation and inhibiting angiotensin II-stimulated ERK1/2 and Rho kinase activity Exp Physiol, May 1, 2008; 93(5): 570 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Murphy and C. Steenbergen Mechanisms Underlying Acute Protection From Cardiac Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Physiol Rev, April 1, 2008; 88(2): 581 - 609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Burstein and S. Nattel Atrial Fibrosis: Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance in Atrial Fibrillation J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 26, 2008; 51(8): 802 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Md. S. Bhuiyan, N. Shioda, and K. Fukunaga Ovariectomy augments pressure overload-induced hypertrophy associated with changes in Akt and nitric oxide synthase signaling pathways in female rats Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2007; 293(6): E1606 - E1614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Morisco, C. Marrone, V. Trimarco, S. Crispo, M. G. Monti, J. Sadoshima, and B. Trimarco Insulin resistance affects the cytoprotective effect of insulin in cardiomyocytes through an impairment of MAPK phosphatase-1 expression Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2007; 76(3): 453 - 464. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Zhao, G. Cheng, L. X. Zhang, Y. T. Tseng, and J. F. Padbury Inhibition of histone deacetylases triggers pharmacologic preconditioning effects against myocardial ischemic injury Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2007; 76(3): 473 - 481. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-T. Hsu, Y.-C. Hsieh, W. H. Kan, J. G. Chen, M. A. Choudhry, M. G. Schwacha, K. I. Bland, and I. H. Chaudry Role of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in estrogen-mediated cardioprotection following trauma-hemorrhage Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2007; 292(6): H2982 - H2987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. B. Suliman, M. S. Carraway, L. G. Tatro, and C. A. Piantadosi A new activating role for CO in cardiac mitochondrial biogenesis J. Cell Sci., January 15, 2007; 120(2): 299 - 308. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Carlson, D. L. Maass, D. J. White, J. Tan, and J. W. Horton Antioxidant vitamin therapy alters sepsis-related apoptotic myocardial activity and inflammatory responses Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): H2779 - H2789. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Wall, J. Wei, M. Ly, P. Belmont, J. J. Martindale, D. Tran, J. Sun, W. J. Chen, W. Yu, P. Oeller, et al. Alterations in oxidative phosphorylation complex proteins in the hearts of transgenic mice that overexpress the p38 MAP kinase activator, MAP kinase kinase 6 Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): H2462 - H2472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Li, J. Y. Ma, I. Kerr, S. Chakravarty, S. Dugar, G. Schreiner, and A. A. Protter Selective inhibition of p38{alpha} MAPK improves cardiac function and reduces myocardial apoptosis in rat model of myocardial injury Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2006; 291(4): H1972 - H1977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||