Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1998;82:1312-1322

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duncker, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Verdouw, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duncker, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Verdouw, P. D.
(Circulation Research. 1998;82:1312-1322.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Original Contributions

Autonomic Control of Vasomotion in the Porcine Coronary Circulation During Treadmill Exercise

Evidence for Feed-Forward ß-Adrenergic Control

Dirk J. Duncker, René Stubenitsky, , Pieter D. Verdouw

From Experimental Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Cardiovascular Research Institute COEUR, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Correspondence to Dirk J. Duncker, MD, PhD, Experimental Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail Duncker{at}tch.fgg.eur.nl


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—To date, no studies have investigated coronary vasomotor control of myocardial O2 delivery (MDO2) and its modulation by the autonomic nervous system in the porcine heart during treadmill exercise. We studied 8 chronically instrumented swine under resting conditions and during graded treadmill exercise. Exercise up to 85% to 90% of maximum heart rate produced an increase in myocardial O2 consumption (MO2) from 163±16 µmol/min (mean±SE) at rest to 423±75 µmol/min (P<=0.05), which was paralleled by an increase in MDO2, so that myocardial O2 extraction (79±1% at rest) and coronary venous O2 tension (cvPO2, 23.7±1.0 mm Hg at rest) were maintained. ß-Adrenoceptor blockade blunted the exercise-induced increase of MDO2 out of proportion compared with the attenuation of the exercise-induced increase in MO2, so that O2 extraction rose from 78±1% at rest to 83±1% during exercise and cvPO2 fell from 23.5±0.9 to 19.6±1.1 mm Hg (both P<=0.05). In contrast, {alpha}-adrenoceptor blockade, either in the absence or presence of ß-adrenoceptor blockade, had no effect on myocardial O2 extraction or cvPO2 at rest or during exercise. Muscarinic receptor blockade resulted in a decreased O2 extraction and an increase in cvPO2 at rest, an effect that waned during exercise. The vasodilation produced by muscarinic receptor blockade was likely due to an increased ß-adrenoceptor activity, since combined muscarinic and ß-adrenoceptor blockade produced similar changes in O2 extraction and cvPO2, as did ß-adrenoceptor blockade alone. In conclusion, in swine myocardium, MO2 and MDO2 are matched during exercise, which is the result of feed-forward ß-adrenergic vasodilation in conjunction with minimal {alpha}-adrenergic vasoconstriction. ß-Adrenergic vasodilation is due to an increase in sympathetic activity but may also be supported by withdrawal of muscarinic receptor–mediated inhibition of ß-adrenergic coronary vasodilation. The observation that cvPO2 levels are maintained even during heavy exercise suggests that a decrease in cvPO2 is not essential for coronary vasodilation during exercise.


Key Words: coronary blood flow • exercise • myocardial O2 extraction • autonomic nervous system • myocardial O2 consumption


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In the normal heart, coronary blood flow is tightly regulated in response to changing metabolic needs to maintain a consistently high level of myocardial O2 extraction. The close coupling of coronary blood flow and myocardial O2 demand has been proposed to depend primarily on messengers released from the myocardium and endothelium but is also modulated by the autononomic nervous system.1 2 Thus, in dogs, the treadmill exercise–induced increases in coronary blood flow and, hence, O2 delivery do not fully match the increase in myocardial O2 demand, so that even at mild to moderate levels of exercise (<70% of maximum heart rate), myocardial O2 extraction increases3 4 5 6 7 and cvPO2 decreases.5 7 8 9 The decrease in cvPO2 may represent a metabolic error signal needed for a negative-feedback control mechanism1 10 but is at least in part due to {alpha}-adrenergic vasoconstriction of coronary resistance vessels.7 9 11 Conversely, the increase in sympathetic nerve activity during exercise also results in ß-adrenergic coronary vasodilation,5 12 which acts in a "feed-forward control" manner (ie, an open-loop control system that does not require an error signal13,14) to blunt the {alpha}-adrenergic vasoconstriction in dogs.

To our knowledge, the only other mammalian heart in which the balance between MDO2 and O2 utilization has been studied during exercise is the human heart.1 2 In humans, myocardial O2 extraction,15 16 17 18 19 20 cvSO2,16 18 19 20 cvO2 content,15 16 19 20 21 or cvPO219 22 are, in contrast to dogs, minimally affected during mild to moderate exercise (<80% of maximum heart rate), but an increase in fractional O2 extraction and a decrease in cvO2 content occur during heavy exercise (>85% of maximum heart rate).18 23 24 25 In humans, the minimal changes in cvPO2 at low to moderate levels of exercise could be due to an increased importance of ß-adrenergic coronary vasodilation26 27 or decreased importance of {alpha}-adrenergic vasoconstriction, but this has not been studied in humans. However, these findings indicate that considerable interspecies differences of coronary vasomotor control may exist during exercise. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated coronary vasomotor control of myocardial O2 balance during treadmill exercise in another mammalian species, ie, swine, and observed that fractional myocardial O2 extraction and cvPO2 did not change even during heavy treadmill exercise (85% to 90% of maximum heart rate). We hypothesized that this could be the result of (1) negligible {alpha}-adrenergic coronary vasoconstriction in swine,28 (2) increased importance of feed-forward ß-adrenergic vasodilation,12 13 14 or (3) withdrawal of vagal constrictor tone.29 30 31 To determine the relative contributions of each of these potential mechanisms, we studied myocardial O2 balance in swine during treadmill exercise in the absence and presence of single and combined blockade of {alpha}- and ß-adrenergic receptors and muscarinic receptors.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Eight crossbred LandracexYorkshire pigs (5 male and 3 female) were used in the present study. All experiments were performed in accordance with the Guiding Principles in the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals as approved by the Council of the American Physiological Society and with the prior approval of the Animal Care Committee of the Erasmus University Rotterdam. Adaptation of animals to the laboratory conditions started 1 week before the day of surgery and continued until 10 days after surgery. Full details of the experimental procedures have been published previously.32 33 34

Surgical Procedures
After an overnight fast, pigs (23±1 kg) were sedated with 30 mg/kg IM ketamine (Ketalin, Apharmo BV), anesthetized with thiopental (10 mg/kg IV, Nesdonal, Rhône-Poulenc Rorer BV), intubated, and mechanically ventilated with a mixture of O2 and nitrous oxide (1:2), to which 0.2% to 1% (vol/vol) isoflurane (Forene, Abbott BV) was added. Anesthesia was further maintained with midazolam (2 mg/kg+1 mg · kg-1 · h-1 IV, Dormicum, Roche BV) and fentanyl (10 µg · kg-1 · h-1 IV, Fentanyl-Janssen, Janssen-Cilag BV). Under sterile conditions, the chest was opened via the fourth left intercostal space, and an 8F fluid-filled PVC catheter was inserted into the aortic arch (for the measurement of central aortic blood pressure and collection of arterial blood samples) and secured with a purse-string suture. After the pericardium was opened, a high-fidelity pressure transducer (model P4.5, Konigsberg Instruments Inc) was inserted into the LV via the apical dimple for recording of LV pressure and its first derivative (LV dP/dt, obtained via electrical differentiation). An 8F PVC catheter was also inserted into the LV for calibration of the Konigsberg transducer signal; another 8F PVC catheter was inserted into the pulmonary artery for administration of drugs. A Doppler flow probe (inner diameter, 2.0 to 3.0 mm; f0, 20 MHz) was placed around the proximal part of the LAD to measure the coronary Doppler shift. A small angiocatheter (inner/outer diameter, 0.8 mm/1.1 mm) connected to a larger Tygon catheter (inner/outer diameter, 0.8 mm/2.4 mm) was inserted directly into the anterior interventricular vein to allow sampling of coronary venous blood.35 Electrical wires and catheters were tunneled subcutaneously to the back, the chest was closed, and the animals were allowed to recover. All electrical wires and catheters were protected with a vest.

Postsurgical Period
During the first week after surgery animals received intravenous injections of 25 mg/kg amoxicillin (Clamoxil, Beecham Farma BV) and 5 mg/kg gentamicin (Ad Usum Veterinarium) on a daily basis to prevent infection. Catheters were flushed daily with physiological saline containing 2000 IU/mL heparin.

Experimental Protocols
Studies were performed 10 to 20 days after surgery with animals exercising on a motor-driven treadmill. With swine lying quietly on the treadmill, resting hemodynamic measurements, consisting of LV pressure, LV dP/dt, aortic blood pressure, and the coronary Doppler shift, were obtained, and arterial and coronary venous blood samples were collected. In 2 of the 8 animals, samples could not be obtained from the coronary venous catheter. Hemodynamic measurements were repeated, and rectal temperature was measured with animals standing on the treadmill. Subsequently, a 5-stage treadmill exercise protocol was started (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 km/h); each exercise stage lasted 2 to 3 minutes. LV pressure, LV dP/dt, aortic blood pressure, and coronary blood flow were continuously measured, and blood samples were collected during the last 30 seconds of each exercise stage, when hemodynamics had reached a steady state. After completing the exercise protocol, animals were allowed to rest on the treadmill.

After 90 minutes of rest, animals underwent 1 of 4 protocols, which were performed in random order and with each protocol performed on a different day. In protocol 1, we studied the reproducibility of 2 consecutive exercise periods. For this purpose, animals received (via the pulmonary artery catheter) an intravenous infusion of saline (10 mL) at a rate of 2 mL/min; 5 minutes after the infusion, resting measurements were obtained, and the 5-stage exercise protocol was repeated. In protocol 2, we studied {alpha}-adrenergic vasomotor control of the coronary circulation during exercise. For this purpose, animals received an intravenous infusion of phentolamine (1 mg/kg in 10 mL saline, administered over 5 minutes) to produce {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade. We have previously shown that this dose of phentolamine results in >95% inhibition of the intra-arterial noradrenaline (0.3 µg/kg)–induced increase in carotid vascular resistance in anesthetized swine.36 Five minutes after completion of the infusion, resting measurements were obtained, and the exercise protocol was repeated. In protocol 3, we studied ß-adrenergic vasomotor control of the coronary circulation during treadmill exercise and studied the {alpha}-adrenergic vasomotor control of the coronary circulation in the presence of ß-adrenergic receptor blockade. For this purpose, animals received an intravenous infusion of propranolol (0.5 mg/kg, dissolved in 10 mL saline administered over 5 minutes) to produce ß-adrenergic receptor blockade. This dosage regimen results in >95% inhibition of isoproterenol-induced increases in heart rate and LV dP/dtmax in awake swine.32 Five minutes later, the exercise protocol was repeated. After another 90 minutes of rest, propranolol (0.2 mg/kg IV, in 4 mL saline) was readministered. We have previously shown that this dosage regimen of propranolol produces identical responses during 2 consecutive exercise protocols.34 Five minutes later, {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade was produced by infusing phentolamine in a dose of 1 mg/kg IV (in 10 mL of saline) at a rate of 2 mL/min, and the exercise protocol was repeated. In protocol 4, we studied muscarinic control of the coronary circulation and studied ß-adrenergic vasomotor control of the coronary circulation in the presence of muscarinic receptor blockade. For this purpose, animals received an intravenous infusion of atropine (30 µg · kg-1 · min-1 at a rate of 1 mL/min) to produce muscarinic receptor blockade. This dose was considered to produce complete vagal blockade, because higher doses did not produce further increases in heart rate. Ten minutes after the start of the infusion, when hemodynamics had reached a new steady state, resting measurements were obtained, and the exercise protocol was repeated. After completion of the exercise protocol, the atropine infusion was interrupted, and animals were allowed to rest for another 90 minutes. Then, animals received an intravenous infusion of propranolol (0.5 mg/kg, dissolved in 10 mL saline) administered at a rate of 2 mL/min. After completion of propranolol administration, the infusion of atropine (30 µg · kg-1 · min-1 IV) was restarted, and 10 minutes later, the exercise protocol was repeated.

Hemodynamic Measurements
Aortic blood pressure was measured using a Combitrans pressure transducer (Braun) with the reference point at midchest level. LV pressure was measured with the Konigsberg micromanometer, which was calibrated with the fluid-filled LV catheter. The coronary Doppler shift was measured with a high-velocity pulsed Doppler velocimeter (model HVPD-20, Crystal Biotech).

Blood Gas Measurements
Blood samples were maintained in iced syringes until the conclusion of each exercise trial. Measurements of PO2 (mm Hg), PCO2 (mm Hg), and pH were then immediately performed with a blood gas analyzer (Acid-Base Laboratory model 505, Radiometer). SO2 and Hb (g/100 mL) were measured with a hemoximeter (OSM2, Radiometer). Blood O2 content (µmol/mL) was computed as follows: (Hbx0.621xSO2)+(0.00131xPO2). MDO2 was computed as the product of LAD coronary blood flow and arterial blood O2 content; MO2 in the region of myocardium perfused by the LAD was calculated as the product of coronary blood flow and the difference in O2 content between arterial and coronary venous blood. Myocardial O2 extraction was computed as the ratio of the arteriovenous O2 content difference and the arterial O2 content.

Data Acquisition and Analysis
Hemodynamic data were recorded and digitized on-line using an 8-channel data-acquisition program (ATCODAS, Dataq Instruments Inc) and stored on a computer for later postacquisition off-line analysis with a program written in MatLab (The Mathworks Inc). A minimum of 15 consecutive beats was selected for analysis of the digitized hemodynamic signals. From these selected beats, the LV peak systolic and LV end-diastolic blood pressure, mean aortic blood pressure, and mean coronary Doppler shift were determined for each beat and averaged.

Mean coronary blood flow was computed from the mean Doppler shift using the following equation: Q=1.25 · {Delta}f · d2, where Q is the coronary blood flow (mL/min), {Delta}f is the Doppler shift (kHz), and d is the internal diameter of the coronary artery (mm) within the flow probe.37 The factor 1.25 is a constant derived from the speed of sound in tissue (c=1.5x105 cm/s), the frequency of the emitted sound beam (f0=20 MHz), the cosine of the angle at which the sound beam is emitted (45o), and unit conversion factors: (cx0.75{pi})/(2f0xcos 45o).37 Since in chronically instrumented animals the flow probe is tightly adhered to the coronary artery, the internal diameter of the flow probe is equal to the external diameter of the artery. To obtain the inner diameter of the coronary artery, we subtracted 10% of the external diameter of the coronary artery, which is approximately the arterial wall thickness. In this way, any error in computation of the coronary internal diameter would affect control and intervention conditions equally. Coronary vascular resistance was computed as the ratio of mean aortic pressure and coronary blood flow.

Statistical analysis was performed using 2-way (exercise and treatment) ANOVA for repeated measures. When a significant effect of exercise was observed, post hoc testing was performed using the Dunnett test. When a significant effect of treatment was observed, post hoc testing was performed using the Student-Newman-Keuls test. A value of P<=0.05 was considered statistically significant (2-tailed). All data are presented as mean±SE.

Drugs
Phentolamine (10 mg/mL, Regitine, CIBA-Geigy BV) was dissolved in water containing glucose (35 mg/mL) and further diluted in saline to produce a final concentration of 1 mg · kg-1 · 10 mL-1. Propranolol (Sigma-Aldrich NV) was dissolved in 30°C saline to produce a concentration of 0.5 mg · kg-1 · 10 mL-1. Atropine (Sigma-Aldrich NV) was dissolved in 30°C saline to produce a concentration of 30 µg · kg-1 · mL-1. Fresh drug solutions were prepared on each day.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Reproducibility of Responses to Exercise
Hemodynamics
A representative example of the effects of saline on the hemodynamic data in an individual animal at rest and during exercise is shown in Figure 1Down; average data for all animals are presented in Figure 2Down. Exercise resulted in increases in heart rate (from 114±5 bpm at rest to 242±3 bpm at 5 km/h), LV systolic pressure (from 118±4 to 149±4 mm Hg), and LV dP/dtmax (from 3110±240 to 6600±380 mm Hg/s) (all P<=0.05) but had no significant effects on mean aortic pressure and LV end-diastolic pressure (8±2 mm Hg at rest). LAD blood flow increased from 40±3 mL/min at rest to 89±11 mL/min during exercise at 5 km/h. After 90 minutes of rest, at a time when all hemodynamic variables had returned to baseline resting values, the second period of exercise resulted in nearly identical hemodynamic responses to exercise.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Recordings of hemodynamic data in an individual animal at rest (lying) and during exercise (5 km/h) during control conditions and in the presence of saline. MAP indicates mean aortic pressure; LVP, LV pressure; LV dP/dt, first derivative of LVP; and CBF, blood flow in the LAD.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Systemic hemodynamic data at rest and during graded treadmill exercise. Shown are the effects of saline, {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade ({alpha}-blockade) produced by phentolamine (Phentol, 1 mg/kg IV), the effects of ß-adrenergic receptor blockade (ß-blockade) produced by propranolol (Prop, 0.5 mg/kg IV), and the effect of {alpha}-adrenergic blockade in the presence of ß-adrenergic receptor blockade ({alpha}-blockade after ß-blockade). Data points were obtained at rest (lying [0L] and standing [0S]) and during 5 levels of treadmill exercise (1 to 5 km/h). HR indicates heart rate; LVSP, LV systolic pressure; MAP, mean aortic pressure; LV dP/dtmax, maximum rate of rise of LVP; LVEDP, LV end-diastolic pressure; and CBF, coronary blood flow. Data are mean±SE (n=8). *P<=0.05 vs rest (lying); {dagger}P<=0.05 vs corresponding time point.

Myocardial O2 Balance
Exercise resulted in a slight decrease in arterial PCO2 (from 44±2 mm Hg at rest to 40±2 mm Hg at 5 km/h) and an increase in pH (from 7.43±0.01 to 7.46±0.01) (both P<=0.05) but had no effect on arterial SO2 (96±1% at rest, lying, and during exercise at 5 km/h). Arterial Hb concentration (8.1±0.2 g% at rest and 9.1±0.4 g% at 5 km/h) and, hence, the arterial O2 content (4.95±0.16 µmol/mL at rest and 5.54±0.20 µmol/mL at 5 km/h) increased by {approx}12% at the highest level of exercise compared with resting conditions (both P<=0.05), whereas cvPCO2 (57±2 mm Hg at rest and 58±1 mm Hg at 5 km/h), cvpH (7.36±0.01 at rest and 7.37± 0.01 at 5 km/h), cvPO2 (23.7±1.0 mm Hg at rest and 23.4 ±1.3 mm Hg at 5 km/h), cvSO2 (20.2±0.6% at rest and 20.1±1.2%), and cvO2 content (1.04±0.06 µmol/mL at rest and 1.17±0.11 µmol/mL at 5 km/h) did not change from their respective resting values. MO2 increased from 163±16 to 423±75 µmol/min, whereas MDO2 delivery increased from 193±18 to 539±99 µmol/min (both P<=0.05), so that myocardial O2 extraction (ie, the ratio between MDO2 and MO2) was not altered during exercise (Figure 3Down). All variables returned to baseline resting values within 90 minutes; a second period of exercise resulted in highly reproducible responses.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Relation between MO2 and cvPO2 (top panels) and between MO2 and myocardial O2 extraction (bottom panels). Shown are the effects of saline, {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade ({alpha}-blockade) produced by phentolamine (Phentol, 1 mg/kg IV), ß-adrenergic receptor blockade (ß-blockade) produced by propranolol (Prop, 0.5 mg/kg IV), and the effect of {alpha}-adrenergic blockade in the presence of ß-adrenergic receptor blockade ({alpha}-blockade after ß-blockade). Data points were obtained at rest (lying) and during 5 levels of treadmill exercise (1 to 5 km/h). Data are mean±SE (n=6). *P<=0.05.

Effects of {alpha}-Adrenergic Receptor Blockade
Hemodynamics
Phentolamine produced a decrease in mean aortic pressure at rest and during treadmill exercise, which was accompanied by increases in heart rate and LV dP/dtmax, but no effect on LV peak systolic pressure or LV end-diastolic pressure (Figures 2Up and 4Down). Coronary blood flow was not significantly altered under resting conditions, but at higher levels of exercise, coronary blood flow increased compared with control exercise.



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Recordings of hemodynamic data in an individual animal at rest (lying) and during exercise (5 km/h) during control conditions and in the presence of {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade ({alpha}-blockade) produced by phentolamine (1 mg/kg IV). MAP indicates mean aortic pressure; LVP, LV pressure; LV dP/dt, first derivative of LVP; and CBF, coronary blood flow.

Myocardial O2 Balance
Phentolamine had no effect on arterial PCO2, pH, or SO2 at rest or during exercise. In the presence of phentolamine arterial Hb concentration (8.3±0.3 g% at rest and 8.6±0.4 g% at 5 km/h, P=NS); hence, the arterial O2 content no longer increased during exercise. Phentolamine had no significant effects on cvPCO2, cvpH, cvPO2, cvSO2, or cvO2 content, either at rest or during exercise, except at 5 km/h, when pH was slightly reduced (7.34±0.01) compared with control exercise (7.38±0.01, P<=0.05). The relations between MO2 and cvPO2 or between MO2 and O2 extraction were not altered (Figure 3Up). However, because arterial O2 content no longer increased during exercise, the relation between MO2 and coronary blood flow shifted slightly upward toward higher blood flows compared with control exercise (not shown).

Effects of ß-Adrenergic Receptor Blockade
Hemodynamics
Propranolol produced decreases in heart rate, LV dP/dtmax, and coronary blood flow and increases in LV end-diastolic pressure but had no effect on mean aortic pressure or LV systolic pressure in resting swine (Figures 2Up and 5Down). Propranolol also markedly blunted the exercise-induced increases in heart rate, LV systolic pressure, LV dP/dtmax, and coronary blood flow compared with control exercise.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Recordings of hemodynamic data in an individual animal at rest (lying) and during exercise (5 km/h) during control conditions, in the presence of ß-adrenergic receptor blockade (ß-blockade) produced by propranolol (0.5 mg/kg IV), and in the presence of combined ß-adrenergic and {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade (ß- and {alpha}-blockade) produced by propranolol (0.2 mg/kg IV) and phentolamine (1 mg/kg IV). MAP indicates mean aortic pressure; LVP, LV pressure; LV dP/dt, first derivative of LVP; and CBF, coronary blood flow.

Myocardial O2 Balance
Propranolol had no effect on arterial PCO2, pH, SO2, or Hb concentration; hence, there was no effect on the arterial O2 content either at rest or during exercise. Similarly, cvPCO2 and cvpH were also not altered by propranolol, but cvPO2, cvSO2, and cvO2 content, which were not affected by propranolol during resting conditions, decreased progressively during exercise in the presence of propranolol (Figure 3Up). Consequently, the relation between MO2 and cvPO2 was shifted downward, and the relation between MO2 and O2 extraction was shifted upward.

Effects of {alpha}-Adrenergic Receptor Blockade in the Presence of ß-Adrenergic Receptor Blockade
Hemodynamics
In the presence of propranolol, phentolamine produced decreases in mean aortic pressure and LV systolic pressure at rest and during treadmill exercise that were similar to the effects of phentolamine in animals with intact ß-adrenoceptors, but the increases in heart rate and LV dP/dtmax were abolished, whereas there was now a modest reduction in LV end-diastolic pressure (Figures 2Up and 5Up). Phentolamine had no significant effect on coronary blood flow or coronary vascular resistance at rest or during exercise compared with propranolol alone.

Myocardial O2 Balance
After propranolol, phentolamine had no effect on arterial PCO2, pH, or SO2 at rest or during exercise. Arterial Hb concentration and, hence, the arterial O2 content failed to increase during exercise in the presence of phentolamine. cvPCO2 and cvpH were not affected by phentolamine in the presence of propranolol, except at 5 km/h, when pH was slightly reduced (7.37±0.01) compared with propranolol treatment (7.39±0.01, P<=0.05). Phentolamine failed to increase cvPO2, cvSO2, or cvO2 content and failed to produce changes in the relation between MO2 and cvPO2 or between MO2 and O2 extraction (Figure 3Up). Similarly, the relation between MDO2 and MO2 was not altered by phentolamine in the presence of propranolol (Figure 6Down). However, because arterial O2 content failed to increase during exercise, the relation between MO2 and coronary blood flow was shifted upward toward higher blood flows to compensate for the lower O2 carrying capacity of the blood (Figure 6Down).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Relation between MO2 and MDO2 (left) and between MO2 and coronary blood flow (CBF) (right). Shown are data points obtained at rest (lying) and during 5 levels of treadmill exercise in the presence of ß-adrenergic receptor blockade produced by propranolol (Prop, 0.5 mg/kg IV) and in the presence of combined ß-adrenergic and {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade produced by Prop (0.2 mg/kg IV) and phentolamine (Phentol, 1 mg/kg IV). Data are mean±SE (n=6). *P<=0.05.

Effects of Muscarinic Receptor Blockade
Hemodynamics
Atropine produced increases in heart rate, LV systolic pressure, LV dP/dtmax, and coronary blood flow and decreases in LV end-diastolic pressure but had no effect on mean aortic pressure under resting conditions (Figures 7Down and 8Down). The effects of atropine gradually waned at progressively higher levels of exercise.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Recordings of hemodynamic data in an individual animal at rest (lying) and during exercise (5 km/h) during control conditions, in the presence of muscarinic receptor blockade (M-blockade) produced by atropine (30 µg · kg-1 · min-1 IV), and in the presence of combined muscarinic and ß-adrenergic receptor blockade (M- and ß-blockade) produced by atropine (30 µg · kg-1 · min-1 IV) and propranolol (0.5 mg/kg IV). MAP indicates mean aortic pressure; LVP, LV pressure; LV dP/dt, first derivative of LVP; and CBF, coronary blood flow.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Systemic hemodynamic data at rest and during graded treadmill exercise. Shown are the effects of muscarinic receptor blockade (M-blockade) produced by atropine (Atro, 30 µg · kg-1 · min-1 IV), the effects of ß-adrenergic receptor blockade in the presence of muscarinic receptor blockade produced by propranolol (Prop, 0.5 mg/kg IV) in the presence of Atro (ß-blockade after M-blockade), the effects of combined muscarinic and ß-adrenergic receptor blockade produced by Atro and Prop (M-blockade and ß-blockade), and the effects of ß-adrenergic receptor blockade (ß-blockade). Data points were obtained at rest (lying [0L] and standing [0S]) and during 5 levels of treadmill exercise (1 to 5 km/h). HR indicates heart rate; LVSP, LV systolic pressure; MAP, mean aortic pressure; LV dP/dtmax, maximum rate of rise of LVP; LVEDP, LV end-diastolic pressure; and CBF, coronary blood flow. Data are mean±SE (n=8). *P<=0.05 vs rest (lying); {dagger}P<=0.05 vs corresponding control or Atro measurement.

Myocardial O2 Balance
Atropine had no effect on arterial PCO2, pH, SO2, Hb concentration, or O2 content either at rest or during exercise, except at 4 km/h, when PCO2 was slightly higher (43±2 mm Hg) compared with control exercise (41±1 mm Hg, P<=0.05); cvPCO2 and cvpH were also not affected by atropine. In contrast, cvPO2, cvSo2, and cvO2 content increased significantly at rest and during exercise at 1 and 2 km/h, but these values were no longer different from control conditions at higher levels of exercise. Consequently, the relation between MO2 and cvPO2 shifted upward in the lower MO2 range, whereas the relation between MO2 and O2 extraction shifted downward (Figure 9Down).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Relation between MO2 and cvPO2 (top panels) and between MO2 and myocardial O2 extraction (bottom panels). Shown are the effects of muscarinic receptor blockade (M-blockade) produced by atropine (Atro, 30 µg · kg-1 · min-1 IV), ß-adrenergic receptor blockade produced by propranolol (Prop, 0.5 mg/kg IV) in the presence of muscarinic receptor blockade (ß-blockade after M-blockade), combined muscarinic and ß-adrenergic receptor blockade (M-blockade and ß-blockade), and ß-adrenergic receptor blockade alone (ß-blockade). Data points were obtained at rest (lying) and during 5 levels of treadmill exercise. Data are mean±SE (n=6). *P<=0.05.

Effects of ß-Adrenergic Receptor Blockade in the Presence of Muscarinic Receptor Blockade
Hemodynamics
The addition of ß-adrenergic receptor blockade with propranolol to muscarinic receptor blockade with atropine resulted in decreases in heart rate, LV systolic pressure, LV dP/dtmax, and coronary blood flow at rest and during exercise and an increase in LV end-diastolic pressure but had no effect on mean aortic pressure (Figures 7Up and 8Up).

Myocardial O2 Balance
The addition of propranolol to atropine had no effect on arterial PCO2, pH, SO2, Hb concentration, and O2 content either at rest or during exercise. Similarly, cvPCO2 and cvpH were also not affected by propranolol. cvPO2, cvSO2, and cvO2 content were decreased both at rest and during exercise, so that the relation between MO2 and cvPO2 was shifted downward, and the relation between MO2 and O2 extraction was shifted upward (Figure 9Up). Importantly, the effects of combined atropine and propranolol on the relations between MO2 and cvPO2 or O2 extraction were not different from the effects of propranolol alone.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study describes for the first time MDO2 and extraction of the LV and its modulation by the autonomic nervous system in awake swine at rest and during treadmill exercise. The major findings of the present study were as follows: (1) in swine, myocardial O2 extraction and cvPO2 were not altered from resting levels during treadmill exercise at levels up to 85% to 90% of maximum heart rate; (2) {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blockade did not alter the relation between MO2 and myocardial O2 extraction or the relation between MO2 and cvPO2 (either in the absence or presence of ß-adrenoceptor blockade), indicating that minimal {alpha}-adrenergic vasoconstriction occurs at rest and during exercise in swine; (3) ß-adrenergic receptor blockade did not alter myocardial O2 extraction or cvPO2 under resting conditions but produced progressively greater myocardial O2 extraction and produced a decrease in cvPO2 during treadmill exercise, indicating that ß-adrenoceptor activity was minimal under resting conditions but contributed in a feed-forward manner to coronary vasodilation during exercise; (4) muscarinic receptor blockade decreased myocardial O2 extraction and increased cvPO2 at rest and during mild exercise, but this effect disappeared at higher levels of exercise, indicating that muscarinic receptor activity exerted a vasoconstrictor influence on the coronary circulation only at rest and during low levels of exercise; and (5) the muscarinic vasoconstriction was most likely the result of inhibition of ß-adrenergic vasodilator influence, since the effects of combined ß-adrenergic receptor and muscarinic receptor blockade on the relation between MO2 and either myocardial O2 extraction or cvPO2 were not different from the effects of ß-adrenergic receptor blockade alone. The implications of these findings, which could not be explained by changes in arterial or coronary venous PCO2 or pH, will be discussed in detail.

Myocardial O2 Extraction During Treadmill Exercise
In dogs, the increase in coronary blood flow produced by treadmill exercise does not fully match the increased myocardial O2 demand; thus, even during mild to moderate levels of exercise (<70% of maximum heart rate), an increase in O2 extraction3 4 5 6 7 and, hence, a decrease in cvPO2 occur.5 7 8 9 In contrast, in humans, minimal changes in O2 extraction occur at mild to moderate levels of exercise,15 16 17 18 19 20 although an increase in O2 extraction and a decrease in cvO2 content have been reported in humans during heavy exercise (>85% of maximum heart rate).18 23 24 25 The present study indicates that at mild to moderate levels of exercise, swine resemble humans more closely than dogs. However, in contrast to dogs and humans, swine also maintain a constant level of myocardial O2 extraction and cvPO2 during heavy exercise, indicating that the exercise-induced increase in MDO2 matches the increase in O2 consumption. A decrease in cvPO2 has been proposed to represent a metabolic error signal needed for a negative-feedback metabolic control mechanism,1 10 which is necessary for the increase in coronary blood flow during exercise. The findings in the present study indicate that a decrease in cvPO2 is not essential for the increase in coronary blood flow in the normal heart during heavy treadmill exercise.

Although swine lack a native collateral circulation, it could be argued that the instrumentation of a coronary artery may have resulted in collateralization of the myocardium perfused by the instrumented LAD. The collateral vessels could potentially supply the LAD bed with additional blood, thereby contributing to a maintained cvPO2. Messina et al38 demonstrated that significant collateral blood flow does not occur until the intercoronary pressure gradient exceeds 70 mm Hg. Clearly, in the normal coronary circulation such intercoronary pressure gradients are not likely to occur even when a coronary artery is chronically instrumented.39 Consequently, alterations in coronary artery blood flow measured with a flow probe around the proximal artery are virtually identical to the increments in myocardial tissue blood flow measured with radioactive microspheres even under conditions of moderate coronary artery stenosis, which produces an intercoronary pressure gradient of <50 mm Hg.39 In addition, nearly identical treadmill exercise–induced increases in blood flow have been observed with simultaneous flow probe (to 321% of resting values) and microsphere (to 315% of resting values) measurements in swine.40 In our laboratory, we previously observed that the vascular resistance responses to dopamine receptor stimulation were similar when measured with a Doppler coronary flow probe or radioactive microspheres.33 Finally, we observed in 5 swine that coronary artery blood flow increased from 40±3 mL/min at rest to 71±6 mL/min (176±8% of resting values) during exercise at 3 to 4 km/h, while simultaneous microsphere measurements demonstrated an increase in myocardial blood flow from 1.52±0.07 mL · min-1 · g-1 at rest to 2.82±0.32 mL · min-1 · g-1 (184±18% of resting values) (authors' unpublished data, 1998). All these studies clearly indicate that under conditions of normal arterial inflow, no discernible collateral blood flow occurs in chronically instrumented hearts, so that the maintained cvPO2 in swine during exercise cannot be explained by the presence of collateral blood flow.

Adrenergic Control of Coronary Blood Flow and Myocardial O2 Extraction During Treadmill Exercise
{alpha}-Adrenoceptors
Although a decrease in cvPO2 during exercise has been proposed to represent a metabolic error signal,1 10 it is at least in part due to {alpha}-adrenergic vasoconstriction,7 9 11 indicating that an increase in {alpha}-adrenergic coronary vasoconstriction can compete with metabolic vasodilation during exercise in dogs. There are some conflicting reports regarding the functional significance of {alpha}-adrenergic receptors in the porcine coronary resistance vessels. Thus, Schulz et al28 infused the selective {alpha}1- and {alpha}2-receptor agonists methoxamine and BHT-933, respectively, into the coronary artery of open-chest vagotomized and ß-blocked swine, while coronary blood flow was maintained constant to prevent metabolic counterregulatory mechanisms from masking {alpha}-adrenergic constriction. Methoxamine had no effect on coronary artery pressure, whereas BHT-933 produced minimal increases, suggesting that no significant {alpha}1- and minimal {alpha}2-receptors exist in porcine coronary resistance vessels.28 In contrast, a recent study reported that gallbladder distension resulted in significant reflex-mediated coronary vasoconstriction, resulting in a decrease in coronary blood flow that was amenable to {alpha}-adrenergic blockade with phentolamine41; the {alpha}-receptor subtype responsible for the contraction was not investigated but, on the basis of a report by Schulz et al,28 would likely be of the {alpha}2 subtype. The observation in the present study that nonselective {alpha}-blockade with phentolamine had no influence on coronary vasomotor tone during exercise is consistent with the concept that the predominant {alpha}-receptor involved in coronary resistance vessel constriction during exercise is of the {alpha}1 type,2 9 11 which swine appear to lack.28 In addition to adrenoreceptors of both the {alpha}1 and {alpha}2 subtypes that are located on postjunctional vascular smooth muscle cells, {alpha}2-adrenoreceptors are also found prejunctionally, where they inhibit the release of catecholamines from sympathetic nerve endings.42 Consequently, phentolamine could have increased coronary blood flow and, hence, increase cvPO2 and decrease O2 extraction indirectly by increasing vascular ß-adrenoceptor stimulation. The observation that phentolamine, either in the absence or presence of ß-adrenoceptor blockade, had no effect on cvPO2 or O2 extraction suggests that prejunctional {alpha}2-mediated control of catecholamine release is of minor importance in the porcine coronary circulation.

Although {alpha}-adrenergic blockade had no effect on the relation between MO2 and MDO2 or cvPO2, {alpha}-adrenergic blockade produced an upward rotation of the relation between MO2 and coronary blood flow (Figure 2Up). The latter was necessitated by the {alpha}-adrenoceptor blockade–induced blunting of the exercise-induced 12±2% increase in Hb. Compared with swine, in dogs, horses, and sheep, O2 delivery to the myocardium is facilitated by even more prominent increases in Hb concentration (20% to 50%) during exercise and by the resultant increase in the O2-carrying capacity of arterial blood.3 4 43 44 45 The increase in Hb concentration is virtually abolished after splenectomy,43 44 indicating that exercise elicits splenic contraction that expresses erythrocyte-rich blood into the general circulation. In dogs, splenectomy also necessitated a greater increase in coronary blood flow at comparable levels of MO2 during norepinephrine infusion.45 In sheep, pretreatment with the nonselective {alpha}-adrenergic receptor blocker phenoxybenzamine markedly blunted the increase in Hb concentrations, indicating that contraction of the spleen is mediated by {alpha}-adrenergic receptor activation during exercise.46 Similarly, in the present study, the increase in Hb was prevented by phentolamine, indicating that splenic contraction in swine is also mediated by {alpha}-adrenoceptors.

ß-Adrenoceptors
Under resting conditions, we observed minimal ß-adrenergic vasodilator influences on coronary vasomotor tone, which is in agreement with earlier studies in awake dogs5 12 and humans.26 However, a progressive increase in ß-adrenergic activity contributed to coronary vasodilation in a feed-forward manner during exercise. Jorgensen et al27 examined the effect of ß-adrenergic blockade with propranolol on coronary blood flow in healthy young adult male human subjects performing upright bicycle exercise. Exercise loads were adjusted to achieve heart rates of 120 bpm during control conditions and after propranolol. At matched heart rates, MO2 levels were similar during control conditions and after ß-adrenergic blockade, but coronary blood flow was 25% less after ß-adrenergic blockade and was accompanied by an increase in myocardial O2 extraction. Also, in young male volunteers, ß-adrenergic blockade with sotalol (10 mg IV) decreased myocardial blood flow during supine bicycle exercise out of proportion to the reduction of MO2, so that myocardial O2 extraction rose and coronary sinus O2 content fell.26 Finally, in dogs, nonselective ß-adrenergic blockade with propranolol also decreased coronary blood flow more than expected from the decrease in MO2, resulting in a significant further increase in myocardial O2 extraction during treadmill exercise.5 12 Miyashiro and Feigl14 demonstrated that the ß-adrenoceptor–mediated vasodilation in open-chest dogs produced by infusion of norepinephrine balances the {alpha}-adrenergic vasoconstriction. In contrast, in swine that lack significant {alpha}-adrenergic vasoconstriction of coronary resistance vessels during exercise, "unopposed" ß-adrenergic vasodilation produced vasodilation that matched the increased O2 demand so that cvO2 content and PO2 were maintained. Only when ß-adrenoceptors were blocked did exercise result in increased O2 extraction and decreased cvPO2. The latter possibly served as a metabolic error signal to produce coronary vasodilation during exercise in the presence of ß-adrenoceptor blockade.

Parasympathetic Control of Coronary Blood Flow at Rest and During Treadmill Exercise
The coronary resistance vessels are richly innervated by the parasympathetic division of the autonomic nervous system.1 In dogs pretreated with propranolol and paced to maintain a constant heart rate, stimulation of the vagosympathetic trunk produces coronary vasodilation independent of the cardiac effects of vagal stimulation.47 The coronary vasodilation produced by vagal stimulation is blocked by atropine and is mimicked by acetylcholine, which involves the release of endothelial nitric oxide in the dog.47 48 In contrast, the nitric oxide–mediated acetylcholine-induced vasodilation in swine is outweighed by a direct vasoconstrictor effect of acetylcholine, resulting in a net vasoconstrictor response to acetylcholine29 30 31 or vagal nerve stimulation.29 Despite ample evidence that stimulation of the parasympathetic system can influence coronary vasomotor tone, the effects of vagal activity under basal resting conditions are generally considered to be negligible, even during basal resting conditions, when vagal activity is high.1 30 However, previous studies have been conducted principally in anesthetized animal models, which could have blunted vagal tone.49 In addition, coronary flow was not related to O2 consumption, which, in view of potential cardiac effects of vagal inhibition, makes interpretation of these studies difficult. The present study demonstrates that in awake swine, blockade of muscarinic receptors elicited a vasodilator response in the coronary resistance vessels under resting conditions that waned during exercise. Vasodilation was likely the result of increased ß-adrenergic activity, since it was fully blocked by the addition of propranolol, so that propranolol alone or in combination with atropine resulted in similar downward shift of the relation between O2 consumption and coronary PO2 and upward shift of the relation between O2 consumption and O2 extraction. Thus, the constrictor influence that was exerted by the parasympathetic nervous system was due to inhibition of ß-adrenergic vasodilator activity, so that withdrawal of vagal tone could have contributed to ß-adrenergic vasodilation at lower levels of exercise.

It cannot be determined from the present study whether the increased ß-adrenergic vasodilation resulted from disinhibition of norepinephrine release at terminal nerve endings within the coronary bed or was due to an increase in circulating catecholamines. There is evidence that vagal stimulation can produce a direct negative inotropic response in the LV independent of its effects on heart rate and sympathetic activity.50 In the present study, atropine produced marked increases in LV dP/dtmax that could be due to disinhibition of ß-adrenoceptor activity or a direct effect on the myocardium. The observation that LV dP/dtmax in resting swine after propranolol alone (2240±110 mm Hg/s) was not different from LV dP/dtmax observed after combined propranolol and atropine (2370±170 mm Hg/s) suggests that intrinsic muscarinic activity in the resting state decreased contractility primarily via inhibition of ß-adrenergic activity, with no discernible direct effect on the myocardium. Therefore, the increase in LV dP/dtmax produced by atropine reflects mostly an increase in sympathetic activity. At comparable levels of LV dP/dtmax, ie, under resting conditions in the presence of atropine (4370±250 mm Hg/s) versus exercise at 2 and 3 km/h under control conditions (4480±210 and 4900±290 mm Hg/s at 2 and 3 km/h, respectively), atropine still produced an increase in cvPO2. Furthermore, over the entire range of exercise intensities during control conditions, cvPO2 was not altered despite marked increments in sympathetic activity. Taken together, these findings could be interpreted to suggest that the interaction between the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous system did not occur at the level of circulating catecholamines but at the level of the resistance vessels. Parasympathetic and sympathetic nerve fiber endings are found at the adventitial-medial border in coronary resistance vessels, indicating that parasympathetic fibers could directly inhibit the release of norepinephrine from the terminal nerve endings in the coronary bed, thereby reducing ß-adrenergic vasodilation.1 Further studies using intracoronary administration of atropine and propranolol are necessary to determine whether the increased ß-adrenergic vasodilation was the result of increased circulating levels of catecholamines, a local interaction at the nerve endings in the coronary resistance vessels, or both.

Conclusions
The present study described the MDO2 and extraction patterns of the LV and its modulation by the autonomic nervous system in awake swine at rest and during treadmill exercise. O2 extraction and cvPO2 were not altered from resting levels during treadmill exercise at levels up to 85% to 90% of maximum heart rate. The maintained levels of cvPO2 were the result of feed-forward ß-adrenergic coronary vasodilation during exercise in conjunction with minimal {alpha}-adrenergic vasoconstriction. The ß-adrenergic vasodilation was likely due to a direct increase in sympathetic activity but may have been supported at lower levels of exercise by withdrawal of muscarinic receptor–mediated inhibition of ß-adrenergic vasodilation.

Although there are a few studies of ß-adrenergic control of MDO2 in humans,26 27 there are, to our knowledge, no human data regarding {alpha}-adrenergic or muscarinic control of vasomotor tone in coronary resistance vessels and their relative contribution to regulation of coronary resistance vessel tone at rest or during exercise. Consequently, concepts of mechanisms of coronary blood flow regulation in the human heart during exercise have, so far, been based largely on exercise data obtained in the dog.1 2 The present study demonstrates significant interspecies differences in coronary vasomotor response and its autonomic control during exercise, warranting studies of autonomic vasomotor control of coronary resistance vessels in humans.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
cvO2 = coronary venous O2
cvPCO2 = coronary venous PCO2
cvpH = coronary venous pH
cvPO2 = coronary venous O2 tension
cvSO2 = coronary venous SO2
f0 = emitting frequency
Hb = hemoglobin
LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery
LV = left ventricle
MO2 = myocardial O2 consumption
MDO2 = myocardial O2 delivery
PVC = polyvinylchloride
SO2 = O2 saturation


*    Acknowledgments
 
The research of Dr Duncker has been made possible by a Research Fellowship of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. The authors gratefully acknowledge Dineke de Bruyn for her secretarial assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Received July 28, 1997; accepted March 26, 1998.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Feigl EO. Coronary physiology. Physiol Rev. 1983;63:1–205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Laughlin MH, Korthuis R, Duncker DJ, Bache RJ. Regulation of blood flow to cardiac and skeletal muscle during exercise. In: Rowell LB, Shepherd JT, eds. Handbook of Physiology, Section 12: Exercise: Regulation and Integration of Multiple Systems. New York, NY: American Physiological Society/Oxford University Press; 1996:705–769.

3. Khouri EM, Gregg DE, Rayford CR. Effect of exercise on cardiac output, left coronary flow and myocardial metabolism in the unanesthetized dog. Circ Res. 1965;17:427–437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. von Restorff W, Holtz J, Bassenge E. Exercise induced augmentation of myocardial oxygen extraction in spite of normal coronary dilatory capacity in dogs. Pflügers Arch. 1977;372:181–185.

5. Heyndrickx GR, Pannier JL, Muylaert P, Mabilde C, Leusen I. Alteration in myocardial oxygen balance during exercise after beta-adrenergic blockade in dogs. J Appl Physiol. 1980;49:28–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Gwirtz PA, Stone HL. Coronary blood flow and myocardial oxygen consumption after alpha adrenergic blockade during submaximal exercise. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1981;217:92–98.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Heyndrickx GR, Muylaert P, Pannier JL. {alpha}-Adrenergic control of oxygen delivery to myocardium during exercise in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol. 1982;242:H805–H809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Dai XZ, Bache RJ. Effect of indomethacin on coronary blood flow during graded treadmill exercise in the dog. Am J Physiol. 1984;247:H452–H458.

9. Bache RJ, Dai X, Herzog CA, Schwartz JS. Effects of non-selective and selective alpha1-adrenergic blockade on coronary blood flow during exercise. Circ Res. 1987;61(suppl II):II-36–II-41.

10. Broten TP, Romson JL, Fullerton DA, Van Winkle DM, Feigl EO. Synergistic action of myocardial oxygen and carbon dioxide in controlling coronary blood flow. Circ Res. 1991;68:531–542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Dai XZ, Sublett E, Lindstrom P, Schwartz JS, Homans DC, Bache RJ. Coronary flow during exercise after selective alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenergic blockade. Am J Physiol. 1989;256:H1148–H1155.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Bassenge E, Kucharczyk M, Holtz J, Stolan D. Treadmill exercise in dogs under ß-adrenergic blockade: adaptation of coronary and systemic hemodynamics. Pflügers Arch. 1972;332:40–55.

13. Houk JC. Control strategies in physiological systems. FASEB J. 1988;2:97–107.[Abstract]

14. Miyashiro JK, Feigl EO. Feedforward control of coronary blood flow via coronary ß-receptor stimulation. Circ Res. 1993;73:252–263.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Lombardo TA, Rose L, Taeschler M, Tuluy S, Bing RJ. The effect of exercise on coronary blood flow, myocardial oxygen consumption and cardiac efficiency in man. Circulation. 1953;7:71–78.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Messer JV, Wagman RJ, Levine HJ, Neill WA, Krasnow N, Gorlin R. Patterns of human myocardial oxygen extraction during rest and exercise. J Clin Invest. 1962;41:725–742.

17. Gorlin R, Krasnow N, Levine HJ, Messer JV. Effect of exercise on cardiac performance in human subjects with minimal heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 1964;13:293–300.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Holmberg S, Serzysko W, Varnauskas E. Coronary circulation during heavy exercise in control subjects and patients with coronary heart disease. Acta Med Scand. 1971;190:465–480.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Richalet JP, Soulard C, Nitenberg A, Teisseire B, de Bovée J, Séroussi S. Myocardial oxygen extraction and oxygen-hemoglobin equilibrium curve during moderate exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1981;47:27–39.

20. Binak K, Harmanci N, Sirmaci N, Ataman N, Ogan H. Oxygen extraction rate of the myocardium at rest and on exercise in various conditions. Br Heart J. 1967;29:422–427.[Free Full Text]

21. Regan TJ, Timmis G, Gray M, Binak K, Hellems HK. Myocardial oxygen consumption during exercise in fasting and lipemic subjects. J Clin Invest. 1961;40:624–630.

22. Doll EJ, Keul H, Steim C, Maiwald C, Reindell H. Uber den Stoffwechsel des Menschlichen Herzens, II: Sauerstoff- und Kohlensauredruck, pH, Standardbicarbonat und base excess im Koronarvenosen Blut in Ruhe, während und nach körperliche Arbeit. Pflügers Arch. 1965;282:28–42.

23. Jorgensen CR, Kitamura K, Gobel FL, Taylor HL, Wang Y. Long-term precision of the N2O method for coronary flow during heavy upright exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1971;30:338–344.[Free Full Text]

24. Kitamura K, Jorgensen CR, Gobel FL, Taylor HL, Wang Y. Hemodynamic correlates of myocardial oxygen consumption during upright exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1972;32:516–522.[Free Full Text]

25. Heiss HW, Barmeyer J, Wink K, Hell G, Cerny FJ, Keul J, Reindell H. Studies on the regulation of myocardial blood flow in man, I: training effects on blood flow and metabolism of the healthy heart at rest and during standardized heavy exercise. Basic Res Cardiol. 1976;71:658–675.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Ekstrom-Jodal B, Haggendal E, Malmberg R, Svedmyr N. The effect of adrenergic ß-receptor blockade on coronary circulation in man during work. Acta Med Scand. 1972;191:245–248.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Jorgensen CR, Wang K, Wang Y, Gobel FL, Nelson RR, Taylor H. Effect of propranolol on myocardial oxygen consumption and its hemodynamic correlates during upright exercise. Circulation. 1973;48:1173–1182.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Schulz R, Oudiz RJ, Guth BD, Heusch G. Minimal {alpha}1- and {alpha}2-adrenoceptor-mediated coronary vasoconstriction in the anaesthetized swine. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1990;342:422–428.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Furusho N, Araki H, Sakaino N, Nishi K, Miyauchi Y. Effects of perivascular nerve stimulation on the flow rate in isolated epicardial coronary arteries of pigs. Eur J Pharmacol. 1988;154:79–84.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Cowan CL, McKenzie JE. Cholinergic regulation of resting coronary blood flow in domestic swine. Am J Physiol. 1990;259:H109–H115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Hata H, Egashira K, Fukai T, Ohara Y, Kasuya H, Takahashi T, Takahashi A. The role of endothelium-derived nitric oxide in acetylcholine-induced coronary vasoconstriction in closed-chest pigs. Coron Artery Dis. 1993;4:891–898.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Duncker DJ, Saxena PR, Verdouw PD. Systemic haemodynamic and beta-adrenoceptor antagonistic effects of bisoprolol in conscious pigs: a comparison with propranolol. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1987;290:54–63.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Duncker DJ, Haitsma DB, Van der Geest IEJ, Stubenitsky R, Van Meegen JR, Man in `t Veld AJ, Verdouw PD. Systemic, pulmonary and coronary haemodynamic actions of the novel dopamine receptor agonist Z1046 in awake pigs at rest and during treadmill exercise. Br J Pharmacol. 1997;120:1101–1113.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Stubenitsky R, Van der Weerd RWP, Haitsma DB, Verdouw PD, Duncker DJ. Cardiovascular effects of the novel Ca2+-sensitizer EMD 57033 in chronically instrumented pigs at rest and during exercise. Br J Pharmacol. 1997;122:1257–1270.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Canty JM Jr, Smith TP Jr. Adenosine-recruitable flow reserve is absent during myocardial ischemia in unanesthetized dogs studied in the basal state. Circ Res. 1995;76:1079–1087.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Verdouw PD, Duncker DJ, Saxena PR. Poor vasoconstrictor response to adrenergic stimulation in the arteriovenous anastomoses present in the carotid vascular bed of young Yorkshire pigs. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1984;272:56–70.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Ishida T, Lewis RM, Hartley CJ, Entman ML, Field JB. Comparison of hepatic extraction of insulin and glucagon in conscious and anesthetized dogs. Endocrinology. 1983;112:1098–1109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Messina LM, Hanley FL, Uhlig PN, Baer RW, Grattan MT, Hoffman JIE. Effects of pressure gradients between branches of the left coronary artery on the pressure axis intercept and the shape of steady state circumflex pressure-flow relations in dogs. Circ Res. 1985;56:11–19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Duncker DJ, Bache RJ. Nitric oxide contributes to coronary vasodilation distal to a coronary artery stenosis that results in myocardial hypoperfusion during exercise. Circ Res. 1994;73:629–640.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Sanders M, White FC, Peterson TM, Bloor CM. Characteristics of coronary blood flow and transmural distribution in miniature pigs. Am J Physiol. 1978;235:H601–H609.

41. Vacca G, Battaglia A, Grossini E, Mary DASG, Molinari C. Reflex coronary vasoconstriction caused by gallbladder distension in anesthetized pigs. Circulation. 1996;94:2201–2209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Heyndrickx GR, Vilaine JP, Moerman EJ, Leusen I. Role of prejunctional {alpha}2-adrenergic receptors in the regulation of myocardial performance during exercise in conscious dogs. Circ Res. 1984;54:683–693.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Vatner SF, Higgins CB, Millard RW, Franklin D. Role of the spleen in the peripheral vascular response to severe exercise in untethered dogs. Cardiovasc Res. 1974;8:276–282.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Manohar M. Transmural coronary vasodilator reserve and flow distribution during maximal exercise in normal and splenectomized ponies. J Physiol (Lond). 1987;387:425–440.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Mundie TG, Januszkiewicz, Ripple GR. Effects of epinephrine, phenoxybenzamine, and propranolol on maximal exercise in sheep. Lab Anim Sci. 1992;42:486–490.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

46. Sato N, Shen YT, Kiuchi K, Shannon RP, Vatner SF. Splenic contraction-induced increases in arterial O2 reduce requirement for CBF in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:H491–H503.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. Broten TP, Miyashiro JK, Moncada S, Feigl EO. Role of endothelium-derived relaxing factor in parasympathetic coronary vasodilation. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:H1579–H1584.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Shen W, Ochoa M, Xu X, Wang J, Hintze TH. Role of EDRF/NO in parasympathetic coronary vasodilation following carotid chemoreflex activation in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol. 1994;267:H605–H613.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49. Vatner SF, Braunwald E. Cardiovascular control mechanisms in the conscious state. N Engl J Med. 1975;6:970–976.

50. Xenopoulos NP, Applegate RJ. The effect of vagal stimulation on left ventricular systolic and diastolic performance. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:H2167–H2173.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
O. Yamaguchi, T. Kaneshiro, S.-i. Saitoh, T. Ishibashi, Y. Maruyama, and Y. Takeishi
Regulation of coronary vascular tone via redox modulation in the {alpha}1-adrenergic-angiotensin-endothelin axis of the myocardium
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2009; 296(1): H226 - H232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
D. J. Duncker and R. J. Bache
Regulation of Coronary Blood Flow During Exercise
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2008; 88(3): 1009 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
V. J. de Beer, O. Sorop, D. A. Pijnappels, D. H. Dekkers, F. Boomsma, J. M. J. Lamers, D. J. Duncker, and D. Merkus
Integrative control of coronary resistance vessel tone by endothelin and angiotensin II is altered in swine with a recent myocardial infarction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): H2069 - H2077.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
D. J. Duncker and D. Merkus
Exercise hyperaemia in the heart: the search for the dilator mechanism
J. Physiol., September 15, 2007; 583(3): 847 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Lynch, T.-C. Lee, J. A. Fallavollita, J. M. Canty Jr, and G. Suzuki
Intracoronary Administration of AdvFGF-5 (Fibroblast Growth Factor-5) Ameliorates Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Prevents Myocyte Loss in Swine With Developing Collaterals and Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
Circulation, September 11, 2007; 116(11_suppl): I-71 - I-76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
R. K. Kudej, Y.-T. Shen, A. P. Peppas, C.-H. Huang, W. Chen, L. Yan, D. E. Vatner, and S. F. Vatner
Obligatory Role of Cardiac Nerves and {alpha}1-Adrenergic Receptors for the Second Window of Ischemic Preconditioning in Conscious Pigs
Circ. Res., November 24, 2006; 99(11): 1270 - 1276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. Merkus, O. Sorop, B. Houweling, B. A. Hoogteijling, and D. J. Duncker
KCa+ channels contribute to exercise-induced coronary vasodilation in swine
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): H2090 - H2097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. Merkus, O. Sorop, B. Houweling, F. Boomsma, A. H. van den Meiracker, and D. J. Duncker
NO and prostanoids blunt endothelin-mediated coronary vasoconstrictor influence in exercising swine
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): H2075 - H2081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. Merkus, D. B. Haitsma, O. Sorop, F. Boomsma, V. J. de Beer, J. M. J. Lamers, P. D. Verdouw, and D. J. Duncker
Coronary vasoconstrictor influence of angiotensin II is reduced in remodeled myocardium after myocardial infarction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): H2082 - H2089.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. D. Tune
Withdrawal of vasoconstrictor influences in local metabolic coronary vasodilation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2006; 291(5): H2044 - H2046.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. C. Ejike, L. S. L. Arakaki, D. A. Beard, W. A. Ciesielski, E. O. Feigl, and K. A. Schenkman
Myocardial oxygenation and adenosine release in isolated guinea pig hearts during changes in contractility
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): H2062 - H2067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. Merkus, A. K. Brzezinska, C. Zhang, S. Saito, and W. M. Chilian
Cardiac myocytes control release of endothelin-1 in coronary vasculature
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2005; 288(5): H2088 - H2092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. W. Gorman, M. Farias III, K. N. Richmond, J. D. Tune, and E. O. Feigl
Role of endothelin in {alpha}-adrenoceptor coronary vasoconstriction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): H1937 - H1942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
D. J. Duncker, D. B. Haitsma, D. A. Liem, P. D. Verdouw, and D. Merkus
Exercise unmasks autonomic dysfunction in swine with a recent myocardial infarction
Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2005; 65(4): 889 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. Merkus, B. Houweling, M. van Vliet, and D. J. Duncker
Contribution of KATP+ channels to coronary vasomotor tone regulation is enhanced in exercising swine with a recent myocardial infarction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2005; 288(3): H1306 - H1313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. Merkus, B. Houweling, A. H. van den Meiracker, F. Boomsma, and D. J. Duncker
Contribution of endothelin to coronary vasomotor tone is abolished after myocardial infarction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2005; 288(2): H871 - H880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
J. van der Velden, D. Merkus, B.R. Klarenbeek, A.T. James, N.M. Boontje, D.H.W. Dekkers, G.J.M. Stienen, J.M.J. Lamers, and D.J. Duncker
Alterations in Myofilament Function Contribute to Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Pigs Early After Myocardial Infarction
Circ. Res., November 26, 2004; 95(11): e85 - e95.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
E. O. Feigl
Berne's adenosine hypothesis of coronary blood flow control
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): H1891 - H1894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. W. Hein, C. Zhang, W. Wang, and L. Kuo
Heterogeneous {beta}2-Adrenoceptor Expression and Dilation in Coronary Arterioles Across the Left Ventricular Wall
Circulation, October 26, 2004; 110(17): 2708 - 2712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. J. C. Alders, A. B. J. Groeneveld, F. J. J. de Kanter, and J. H. G. M. van Beek
Myocardial O2 consumption in porcine left ventricle is heterogeneously distributed in parallel to heterogeneous O2 delivery
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): H1353 - H1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. D. Tune, M. W. Gorman, and E. O. Feigl
Matching coronary blood flow to myocardial oxygen consumption
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2004; 97(1): 404 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. Merkus, B. Houweling, A. Zarbanoui, and D. J. Duncker
Interaction between prostanoids and nitric oxide in regulation of systemic, pulmonary, and coronary vascular tone in exercising swine
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2004; 286(3): H1114 - H1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
D. Merkus, B. Houweling, A. Mirza, F. Boomsma, A. H van den Meiracker, and D. J Duncker
Contribution of endothelin and its receptors to the regulation of vascular tone during exercise is different in the systemic, coronary and pulmonary circulation
Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2003; 59(3): 745 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. Merkus, D. B. Haitsma, T.-Y. Fung, Y. J. Assen, P. D. Verdouw, and D. J. Duncker
Coronary blood flow regulation in exercising swine involves parallel rather than redundant vasodilator pathways
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 5, 2003; 285(1): H424 - H433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. B. Haitsma, D. Merkus, J. Vermeulen, P. D. Verdouw, and D. J. Duncker
Nitric oxide production is maintained in exercising swine with chronic left ventricular dysfunction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): H2198 - H2209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
J. D. Tune, K. N. Richmond, M. W. Gorman, and E. O. Feigl
Control of Coronary Blood Flow during Exercise
Experimental Biology and Medicine, April 1, 2002; 227(4): 238 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
D. B Haitsma, D. Bac, N. Raja, F. Boomsma, P. D Verdouw, and D. J Duncker
Minimal impairment of myocardial blood flow responses to exercise in the remodeled left ventricle early after myocardial infarction, despite significant hemodynamic and neurohumoral alterations
Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2001; 52(3): 417 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
B. J. Hart, X. Bian, P. A. Gwirtz, S. Setty, and H. F. Downey
Right ventricular oxygen supply/demand balance in exercising dogs
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2001; 281(2): H823 - H830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. J. Duncker, H. H. Oei, F. Hu, R. Stubenitsky, and P. D. Verdouw
Role of KATP+ channels in regulation of systemic, pulmonary, and coronary vasomotor tone in exercising swine
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2001; 280(1): H22 - H33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. W. Gorman, J. D. Tune, K. N. Richmond, and E. O. Feigl
Feedforward sympathetic coronary vasodilation in exercising dogs
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2000; 89(5): 1892 - 1902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. W. Gorman, J. D. Tune, K. N. Richmond, and E. O. Feigl
Quantitative analysis of feedforward sympathetic coronary vasodilation in exercising dogs
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2000; 89(5): 1903 - 1911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. P. van Kats, D. J. Duncker, D. B. Haitsma, M. P. Schuijt, R. Niebuur, R. Stubenitsky, F. Boomsma, M. A. D. H. Schalekamp, P. D. Verdouw, and A. H. J. Danser
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition and Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockade Prevent Cardiac Remodeling in Pigs After Myocardial Infarction : Role of Tissue Angiotensin II
Circulation, September 26, 2000; 102(13): 1556 - 1563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
D. J. Duncker, R. Stubenitsky, P. A.L. Tonino, and P. D. Verdouw
Nitric oxide contributes to the regulation of vasomotor tone but does not modulate O2-consumption in exercising swine
Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2000; 47(4): 738 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
K. N. Richmond, J. D. Tune, M. W. Gorman, and E. O. Feigl
Role of K+ATP channels in local metabolic coronary vasodilation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 1999; 277(6): H2115 - H2123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Bartunek, W. Wijns, G. R. Heyndrickx, and B. de Bruyne
Effects of Dobutamine on Coronary Stenosis Physiology and Morphology : Comparison With Intracoronary Adenosine
Circulation, July 20, 1999; 100(3): 243 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
T. Yada, K. N. Richmond, R. van Bibber, K. Kroll, and E. O. Feigl
Role of adenosine in local metabolic coronary vasodilation
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 1999; 276(5): H1425 - H1433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. J. Duncker, R. Stubenitsky, and P. D. Verdouw
Role of adenosine in the regulation of coronary blood flow in swine at rest and during treadmill exercise
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 1998; 275(5): H1663 - H1672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Takamura, R. Parent, and M. Lavallee
Enhanced contribution of NO to exercise-induced coronary responses after alpha -adrenergic receptor blockade
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2002; 282(2): H508 - H515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. B. Haitsma, D. Merkus, J. Vermeulen, P. D. Verdouw, and D. J. Duncker
Nitric oxide production is maintained in exercising swine with chronic left ventricular dysfunction
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2002; 282(6): H2198 - H2209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duncker, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Verdouw, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duncker, D. J.
Right arrow Articles by Verdouw, P. D.