Articles |
From the Division of Cardiology (T.I., M.Y., T.U., D.H., W.J.M., P.-S.C., H.S.K.), Department of Medicine, and the Department of Pathology (M.C.F.), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Burns and Allen Research Institute, and UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif.
Correspondence to Hrayr S. Karagueuzian, PhD, Division of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Research Institute, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Room 6066, Los Angeles, CA 90048. E-mail Karagueuzian{at}csmc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: reentry mapping atrium source-sink relationship acetylcholine
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Recording Electrodes
A rectangular plaque electrode array (3.8x3.2 cm) containing
509 bipolar electrodes in 25 rows and 21 columns was constructed on the
floor of the tissue bath (Fig 2
). Sixteen
channels in the uppermost row were not functional, leaving a total of
509 functional channels. The interelectrode distance was 1.6 mm,
and the interpolar distance was 0.5 mm. The electrodes were made
of stainless steel wires of 0.4-mm diameter that were insulated, except
at the tip. The isolated tissue was gently placed, endocardial side
down, on the plaque electrode array (Fig 2
). The upper nonfunctional
electrode row did not touch the tissue. Each bipolar electrode
protruded 3 mm from the bottom of the tissue bath, allowing free
flow of the oxygenated Tyrode's solution that maintained
tissue viability for the entire 2-hour study period.12 The
presence of sharp electrogram deflections on the entire endocardial
mapped surface indicated the absence of injury potentials. The
electrograms were filtered between 0.5 and 500 Hz and were acquired
continuously for 8 seconds at 1000 samples/s with 18-bit
accuracy.12 14 15 Tissue stability was confirmed by the
presence of constant endocardial and epicardial diastolic
excitability thresholds on repeat measurements (every 20 to 30 minutes)
during the entire 2-hour study period. Tissue stability was further
confirmed by the presence of similar isochronal activation maps at
the beginning and at the end of the experiment of regularly driven
beats.
|
Transmembrane AP Recordings
In order to determine cellular electrical viability of cells
near the hole, we used conventional glass
microelectrodes13 16 17 to record transmembrane APs
from three additional endocardial atrial tissues. Digitized data
(10-kHz sampling rate) were stored using Axoscope 1.1 (Axon Instrument,
Inc). dV/dtmax of the phase-zero AP was determined from the
digitized signal (Axoscope). Simultaneous two-cell AP
recordings were made from cells within 1 mm of the
boundary of the hole and from cells 10 to 15 mm away from the hole
near the periphery of the tissue. In each tissue, we recorded from
4 cells near the hole and from 4 cells at the periphery for a total of
12 cells in all three tissues. The AP recordings were made
during regular pacing at 300-ms cycle length and during induced
reentrant activity in the presence of
10x10-6 mmol/L ACh. During
endocardial transmembrane AP recordings, a
simultaneous epicardial activation map was obtained during
regular pacing and during induced atrial activity by our in vitro
mapping system (Fig 2
).
Induction of Reentrant Wave Fronts
The isolated atrial tissues were paced with
polytetrafluoroethylene-coated (except at
the tip) bipolar silver wires (0.1-mm tip diameter) with a 2-mm
interpolar distance. Regular (S1) stimuli with twice the
diastolic threshold current and 5-ms pulse widths at cycle
lengths of 300 to 400 ms were applied either at the middle left or at
the middle lower edge of the tissue. A premature (S2)
stimulus, with increasing current strengths (1 to 20 mA) and decreasing
coupling intervals was applied at 0.5 to 1.5 cm distal to the
S1 site near the central hole of the tissue. Premature
stimuli were applied until reentry or tissue refractoriness was
reached. When reentry was not induced, higher S2 current
strengths were tested. The configuration of the electrode for the
S2 stimulus was the same as the electrode for the
S1 stimulus.
Determination of the Refractory Period and the Excitable
Gap
Refractoriness
The refractory period at selected endocardial sites was
determined by the S1-S2 extrastimulus method.
After eight S1 stimuli at 400-ms cycle length, an
S2 stimulus with twice the diastolic threshold
current was applied at progressively shorter coupling intervals until
loss of capture. The longest S1-S2 interval
associated with noncapture was the effective refractory period.
S2 was applied at the same site as the S1
stimulus. In five tissues we determined the refractory period at 25
endocardial sites (five rows and five columns) 5 mm apart, for a
total of 125 sites. The refractory period at the boundary of the
central hole was also determined at 30° to 40° increments (eight
sites) along the perimeter of an 8-mm hole.
Excitable Gap
To determine the duration of the excitable gap during stationary
(attached) reentry, single stimuli at twice the diastolic
threshold current were applied between the top middle edge of the
tissue and the middle upper perimeter of the hole. A monitoring bipolar
silver electrode
(polytetrafluoroethylene-coated, except at
the tip) with 0.1-mm diameter and 1-mm interpolar distance was
positioned within 2 mm of the stimulating electrode. The stimuli
were applied at progressively longer coupling intervals, as determined
by the local bipolar electrogram. The shortest captured interval after
the start of the depolarization near the pacing site was taken as the
recovery time. The difference between the cycle length of the reentry
and the shortest captured interval (recovery time) was taken as the
duration of the excitable gap.12 During detached
(meandering) reentrant wave fronts (see "Results"), excitable gap
duration could not be determined by timed stimulation because of the
nonstationary nature of the reentrant wave front.
Construction of Activation Pattern
A custom-made multichannel computerized mapping system (EMAP,
Uniservices) was used to construct activation patterns. The times of
activation were determined by the computer according to our previously
described algorithm.3 12 14 15 Briefly, the maximum dV/dt
of the range for data analysis was first determined by the
computer. The S2 artifact, which had an artificially large
dV/dt, was excluded. Because it is unlikely that the computer would be
100% specific and sensitive in selecting activations, manual editing
was performed for each activation on each channel. After activation
times were edited manually, the patterns of activation were visualized
dynamically on a computer screen on which each electrode site was
illuminated when an activation was registered.3 12 15
During each activation when an electrode site was illuminated, the
computer directed the corresponding site to be illuminated initially
red, then yellow, then green, then light blue, and then finally dark
blue before the original background dark color
reemerged.3 12 15 Each illumination was selected to
persist for 6 to 10 ms. The total duration of illumination of each dot
by one activation could thus be preset at 30 to 50 ms. These times were
chosen because they were shorter than the refractory periods of the
atrial tissue and the fastest cycle length of the induced reentry. The
total duration of the illumination does not reflect true tissue
refractoriness but was used to monitor conveniently the wave-front
dynamics. In cases of very rapid and irregular activity, shorter
durations were used. Both 6- and 10-ms durations were used in most
episodes to ensure correct delineation of the wave-front dynamics.
Selected color snapshots were obtained on a hard copy (Hewlett-Packard
Paint Jet XL300) at different moments during
reentry.3 12 15
Trajectory of a Reentrant Wave Front
During dynamic display of activation, the approximate location
of the tip of a reentrant wave front was first identified from a still
frame. The trajectory of the reentry tip was then traced using a mouse
and custom-written software by advancing the still frames in 10- to
20-ms intervals for several consecutive reentrant
cycles.3 12 15 Typically, when meandering occurred, the
tip of the reentry did not return to the same point from which it
originated. In cases of stationary reentry, tip trajectories of
consecutive reentrant cycles were superimposed on each other.
Statistical Analysis
Differences between the means of the cycle lengths and
conduction velocities in tissues with no hole and in tissues with
different hole sizes were tested using ANOVA (Bonferroni/Dunn test).
Linear regression analysis was performed to correlate hole size
with conduction velocity and with cycle length and to correlate cycle
length with excitable gap duration using StatView 4.5 (Macintosh) and
GB-STAT statistical software.18 A value of
P=.05 was considered significant. Data are presented
as mean±SD.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Transmembrane Potential Properties of Cells Near the Hole
Fig 4A
shows
simultaneous APs from two cells, one within 1 mm from
an 8-mm-diameter hole (top recordings) and the second 1 cm from
the edge of the tissue near the S1 pacing site. The AP
properties (measured during pacing at 300-ms cycle length and in the
presence of 15x10-6 mmol/L ACh)
of the cells at these two sites were not significantly different from
each other. In a total of 12 cell pairs recorded in three tissue
samples (4 cell pairs from each tissue), the resting membrane
potential, AP amplitude, 90% repolarization time, and
dV/dtmax were as follows: 76±7 versus 74±9 mV, 108±9
versus 105±12 mV, 84±11 versus 87±13 ms, and 65±11 versus 58±14
V/s in the cells distant versus cells close to the hole (8-mm
diameter), respectively. The effective refractory period and the
diastolic threshold current near the hole were not
significantly different from cells located 10 to 15 mm away from
the hole (66.9±18 versus 72±16 ms and 0.32±0.12 versus 0.30±01.5
mA, respectively) (P=NS). During S2-induced
reentry, cells near the obstacle and at the periphery became
activated during each cycle of the reentry (Fig 4A
and 4B
).
|
Characteristics of the S2 Stimulus for the Induction
of Reentry
The creation of central holes of 2- to 10-mm diameters had no
effect on the mean duration of the S1-S2
coupling intervals (78±10 ms) and the mean S2 current
strength (8±5 mA) that induced reentry. The mean refractory period at
the S2 site remained unchanged (69±9 ms) after the
creation of holes with progressively larger diameters (2 to 10
mm).
Reentrant Wave Fronts in the Absence of a Central Hole
Thirteen episodes of reentry (mean cycle length, 101±11 ms ) were
induced before creating central holes in a total of eight tissues
(Table
). Reentry was clockwise in 7
episodes and counterclockwise in the remaining 6 episodes. In all of
these episodes, reentry was nonstationary as the central core of the
reentry meandered from one site to another. Meandering prevented
measurement of the "natural core size" because of a complex and
irregular contour inscribed by the irregularly meandering core. Fig 5
illustrates a
representative example of a meandering reentrant wave
front rotating in a clockwise direction. In all 13 episodes, new wave
fronts emerged at the tail of the meandering reentrant wave front 60 to
100 ms after a previous activation. Fig 5H
shows the emergence of a new
wave front at the tail of the reentrant wave front 60 ms after a
previous activation. These new wave fronts interacted with the
meandering reentrant wave front but failed to terminate reentry. In 5
of 13 episodes, reentry lasted for >10 minutes. In these episodes,
reentry was terminated by pacing. In the remaining 8 episodes, reentry
terminated spontaneously at the tissue border within 1 to 3 minutes.
Meandering of the reentrant wave fronts was associated with irregular
bipolar electrogram morphology and constantly changing cycle lengths.
Fig 6
shows selected bipolar electrograms
during the reentry shown in Fig 5
. These wave-front dynamics, including
the patterns of spontaneous termination and bipolar polymorphism,
are consistent with our previous results.3 12
|
|
|
Reentrant Wave Fronts in the Presence of a Central Hole
Fig 7
shows the effect of a
central hole with a 4-mm diameter on an induced reentrant wave front.
The induced reentry propagated in the counterclockwise direction and
was nonstationary as the core meandered from one site to another. The
tip of the meandering reentrant wave front did not attach to the hole,
because it could variably get closer to (Fig 7B
) and further away from
(Fig 7D
through 7G) the hole. In Fig 7G
, for example, the electrodes at
the southern border of the hole were not activated by the
leading edge of the reentrant wave front. However, this same area of
the tissue was activated later (Fig 7H
), indicating that the
tissue in that area was excitable and not refractory,
consistent with transmembrane AP recordings near the
obstacle shown in Fig 7B
. We had seen similar meandering of reentry in
six tissues with holes of 4-mm diameter in a total of 9 episodes.
Similar results were also obtained in six tissues with 2-mm-diameter
holes in a total of 9 episodes (Table
). In all tissues with 2- and
4-mm-diameter holes, the tip of the reentrant wave front did not
consistently attach itself to the hole. Rather, the tip of the
reentrant wave front variably approached and departed from the boundary
of the obstacle during reentry, resulting in irregular transmembrane AP
amplitude and activation intervals near the obstacle (Fig 4B
). The
creation of 2- and 4-mm-diameter holes had no significant effect on the
mean cycle length of the reentry (99±10 and 103±8 ms, respectively)
(Table
). During meandering of the reentrant wave front in tissues with
2-and 4-mm-diameter holes, new wave fronts emerged, as was the case in
the intact tissues before the induction of the lesions (Fig 5
). The
bipolar electrograms recorded during meandering of reentry in
tissues with 2- and 4-mm-diameter holes showed polymorphism
characterized with nonuniform electrogram morphology and variable
cycle lengths (Figs 4B
and 8
).
|
|
In contrast to the smaller-sized holes, holes with 6-, 8-, and 10-mm
diameters caused a continuous attachment of the tip of the reentrant
wave front to the obstacle during consecutive reentrant rotations. The
attachment of the tip of the reentry to the obstacle converted the
nonstationary to a stationary reentrant wave front. Fig 9
illustrates an example of tip
attachment in a tissue with a 10-mm-diameter hole. Reentry with a
clockwise direction (double arrows in Fig 9A
through 9H) at a cycle
length of 134 ms is shown in this example. Effective attachment of the
tip of the reentry to the hole is evident as the tip of the reentry
remains attached to the hole throughout the entire interval of the
rotation. The rotating front returns to the same point from which it
originated during one rotation period (Fig 9A
and 9E
). Attachment was
seen in all eight tissues with 6- and 8-mm-diameter holes (10 episodes)
and in six tissues with 10-mm-diameter holes (10 episodes) (Fig 9
). The
bipolar electrograms during a tip-attached stationary reentry had a
uniform morphology and a constant cycle length (Figs 4A
and 10
). In addition, during induced
stationary reentry in all tissues studied with 6- to 10-mm-diameter
holes, no new wave front ever emerged during up to 10 minutes of
monitoring.
|
|
Relationship Between Hole Size and Cycle Length of the
Reentry
The mean cycle length of the reentry was significantly
(P<.001, Bonferroni/Dunn test) longer in tissues with 6-,
8-, and 10-mm-diameter holes (121±11, 125±10, and 131±9 ms,
respectively) than those in tissues with no holes or 2- and
4-mm-diameter holes (Table
). No significant differences in reentry
cycle length were found in tissues with 6-, 8-, and 10-mm-diameter
holes (Table
) (Bonferroni/Dunn test). Fig 11A
is a regression line of the cycle
length versus hole diameter for attached reentry in all eight tissues
studied. A positive linear correlation (correlation coefficient, .86)
was found between the hole diameter (mm) and the cycle length (ms) of
the anchored reentrant wave front: y (cycle length in
ms)=106+2.5x (hole diameter in mm).
|
Relationship Between Conduction Velocity Around the Hole and the
Hole Size
Constant attachment of the tip of the reentry to the fixed border
of the circular holes with 6- to 10-mm diameters allowed us to estimate
the velocity of conduction with reasonable degree of accuracy. Since
the traveled path of the circular hole-attached tip of the reentry is
2
xradius of the hole (ie, perimeter of the circle) and the
conduction time over this path is identical to the cycle length of the
reentry, conduction velocity could be calculated by dividing the
perimeter of the hole (distance) by the cycle length (time) of the
reentry. With such calculations, a significant (P<.05)
positive linear correlation was found between the hole diameter
(x axis) and the conduction velocity (y axis),
with a correlation coefficient of .99 (Fig 11B
): y
(cm/s)=3.1+2.1x (mm). Conduction velocity significantly
(P<.001, Bonferroni/Dunn test) increased at each step
increase in the hole diameter from 6 to 8 to 10 mm (15.5±1.4,
20.2±1.6, and 24±1.5 cm/s, respectively) (Table
, Fig 11B
).
Excitable Gap During Reentry Around a Hole
The ability of the reentry to remain attached and stationary to
the holes with 6- to 10-mm-diameter holes allowed us to determine the
duration of the excitable gap. We applied premature stimuli at twice
the diastolic current threshold at the middle top of the
tissue during attached reentrant wave fronts of excitations. Fig 12A
shows the shortest coupling
interval (82 ms) that an applied stimulus captures in the atrium after
a reentrant beat (tracing 4). Since the cycle length of the reentry was
120 ms (top recording), the estimated excitable gap was 38 ms.
Fig 12B
shows pooled results in three tissues with 6-, 8-, and
10-mm-diameter holes (three episodes with each hole size for a total of
nine episodes). A significant (P<.005) positive linear
correlation (r=.89) was detected between the excitable gap
duration and the cycle length of the anchored reentry (Fig 12B
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Attachment and the Size of the Anatomic Obstacle
The safety factor for propagation is determined by the
relationship between the current source of the wave front and the need
of adjacent cells of depolarizing current to reach threshold for
excitation (sink).22 23 Not all segments of a reentrant
wave front have the same intrinsic stimulating efficacy (source). For
example, the tip of the reentrant wave front, by virtue of its high
curvature, has lower safety margin (source) for propagation than the
less curved periphery of the wave front.22 In addition,
not all regions of a propagating wave front confront the same current
load (sink). The presence of local variations in the source-to-sink
ratio causes a discontinuous wave front. In our case, the discontinuity
results in separation of the reentry tip from the obstacle boundary and
detachment from the hole. Detachment results from a low source-to-sink
ratio rather than from prolonged cellular refractoriness near the
obstacle, because the cells near the hole are excited during phase-3
repolarization during rapid reentrant activity (Fig 4B
). If
refractoriness had been the mechanism of wave front detachment, then
the cells near the hole would still be refractory during the next
reentry cycle.
An obstacle of relatively larger size lowers the sink of a rotating
wave front with a resultant increase in the source-to-sink ratio
(safety factor). The increase in the safety factor leads to the
depolarization of all the cells at the boundary of the obstacle.
Depolarization of all the cells at the boundary of the obstacle results
in attachment. Although earlier simulation studies24
stressed the importance of hole size relative to the spiral wave period
and stability, it was only recently that a precise quantitative
description of the source-sink balance at the boundary of the obstacle
was provided.8 25 26 The results of simulation studies in
Dr Starmer's laboratory8 support our proposed mechanistic
speculation. When the ratio of the source at the tip of the wave front
is higher than the charge requirement (load or sink) of the cells at
the boundary of the obstacle, the front successfully depolarizes all
the cells at the boundary (perimeter) of the obstacle causing
attachment. However, when the source-to-sink ratio of the tip of the
front diminishes (as in cases of acute turns around smaller holes), the
cells at the boundary of the obstacle can no longer be depolarized.
This results in separation of the front from the boundary of the hole.
Spach et al27 in studies of isolated superfused canine
right atria have shown that conduction block at branch sites requires
abrupt acute turns (larger sink) but that absence of block at the same
site of wave front propagation does not require making an acute turn
(smaller sink). Optical mapping studies of Girouard et
al28 involving the rabbit ventricle confirmed that an
abrupt change in current load (sink) during wave-front pivoting around
a linear obstacle rather than refractoriness and/or fiber structure was
a major determinant for reentrant wave-front stability. The results of
our transmembrane AP recordings near the obstacle are
compatible with the source-to-sink mismatch hypothesis of separation
rather than with the prolonged local cellular refractoriness
hypothesis. Fig 13
illustrates our
hypothesis. This figure shows two holes, one large and one small. A
reentrant wave front is rotating around the hole in a counterclockwise
direction. When the hole is large, the sink (ie, number of cells at
rest) is relatively small. This leads to successful depolarization of
all the cells at the boundary of the hole, resulting in attachment.
However, when the hole is small, the same reentrant wave front (source)
must excite additional cells at rest, resulting in source-to-sink
mismatch and wave-front detachment.
|
Hole Size Versus Cycle Length of Reentry
Larger holes significantly increased the conduction velocity
around the hole while causing a slight but not significant prolongation
of the reentry period, consistent with simulation
studies.24 29 30 Faster speeds of propagation may result
from a higher safety factor for propagation in tissues with larger
holes because of the higher source-to-sink ratios (Fig 13
). However,
since the traveled path around the perimeter of a larger holes also
increased, the net effect was no increase or only a small increase in
the reentry period (Table
, Fig 11A
). Assuming that a linear
relationship between conduction velocity around the hole and the hole
diameter exists even for smaller diameter holes (<6 mm),
extrapolation of the regression line of velocity (y axis)
versus diameter (x axis) to zero hole diameter yields a
conduction velocity of 3.1 cm/s (Fig 11B
). This extrapolated conduction
velocity to zero hole diameter (ie, functional reentry) corresponds to
the velocity of the leading edge of the reentry around its natural core
during functional reentry. Since the mean cycle length of reentry in
the absence of a hole is 106 ms (extrapolated value in Fig 11A
) and is
very close to the actual experimental value of 101 ms (Table
), then the
distance traveled during one period around the circular perimeter of
the natural core12 should correspond to 3.28 mm. This
perimeter corresponds to a radius of 0.52 mm (1-mm diameter) and
reflects the radius of the natural core of atrial reentry in the
presence of ACh. The extrapolated value of the radius of the natural
core in the presence of ACh is smaller than the core radius measured
directly during stationary reentry in the absence of ACh, ie, 2
mm.12 The decrease in the core radius from 2 to 0.5
mm could explain the mechanism by which ACh accelerates reentry rate.
This speculation is compatible with the results obtained in isolated
normal ventricular tissue31 32 and at the
epicardial border zone of healing infarcts in in situ canine
hearts.33 Acceleration of functional reentry in these
studies was shown to be associated with a reduction of the central core
size around which rotation occurred.31 32 33 In addition,
ACh-induced reduction of the natural core size suggests that ACh
increases the critical wave-front curvature22 (ie, the
curvature at which propagation fails). The increase in the critical
curvature explains the ability of very small reentrant wave front to
sustain activity for longer duration, a phenomenon that does not occur
in the absence of ACh.2 12 Our experimentally extrapolated
value of critical curvature is compatible with simulation
studies.34
Polymorphic Versus Monomorphic Electrograms
Meandering of a single reentrant atrial wave front caused
fibrillation-like activity as in ventricular
tissue7 35 and in simulation studies.36 It
would therefore appear that in addition to the multiple-wavelet
hypothesis of AF,2 37 38 a single meandering reentrant
wave front may also cause fibrillation in the atrium. Prevention of
meandering by attachment to an obstacle may convert AF to atrial
flutter, a phenomenon recognized a long time ago.10 The
ability of flutter to convert to fibrillation may also depend on the
cellular electrophysiological properties of
the atrial tissue and on the rate of the flutter. For example, if the
atria are diseased (fibrosis), relatively slower flutters may undergo
fibrillatory conduction (wave-front breakups), leading to AF. In normal
atria on the other hand, faster atrial flutter rates may be needed for
conversion to AF. Slower flutters may remain stable in normal atria.
Conversion from fibrillation to flutter is compatible with the
observation made in ventricular tissue7 35 and
in simulation studies,1 36 39 where attachment of a single
meandering reentry converts polymorphic activity into a regular
monomorphic activity.
New Wave Fronts
Meandering was always associated with the emergence of new wave
fronts that appeared to have no direct relationship to the original
reentrant wave front. Emergence of new wave fronts was also described
by Allessie et al,37 Schuessler and
colleagues,2 40 and Gray et al41 and by
us.3 It is possible that rapid meandering of the wave
front in the complex right atrial structure alters the sequence of
activation and recovery, promoting wave break31 and
initiation of new reentrant or nonreentrant wave fronts.
Consistent with this suggestion is the absence of new wave
fronts in all tissues and in all episodes in which meandering was
eliminated by wave-front attachment at the boundary of the hole.
Excitable Gap and Anatomic Obstacle
The ability to electrically capture the ACh-treated atrium during
attached reentry and the emergence of new wave fronts at the tail of a
meandering reentry indicates that an excitable gap is present. The
presence of a positive linear correlation between the cycle length and
the duration of the excitable gap holds true regardless of the presence
of ACh12 or a central obstacle. These findings are
compatible with the results obtained in ventricular
tissue42 and in atrial tissue with no ACh
present.12
Limitations of the Study
The origin of the new wave fronts that emerged during
meandering reentrant wave front could not be defined in the present
study. The fact that ACh is always present argues against an
automatic mechanism.2 40 43 44 It is possible that the new
wave fronts originate from either epicardial or intramural sites that
could not be detected by our mapping technique. Alternatively, it may
be argued that the new wave fronts originate from an
"ischemic core" of the superfused tissue. However, the
complete absence of such new wave fronts during attached reentry
(tissues with 6- to 10-mm-diameter holes) argues against this
hypothesis. Although not proven, it is likely that the irregular
activation-recovery patterns during a single meandering reentrant wave
front promote wave breaks and the generation of new wave fronts.
It is possible that the excitable gap interval could be
underestimated. This underestimation,
15 ms may result as follows:
The site of the stimulation and the site of the recording
bipolar electrode used to measure the earliest captured interval are 2
to 3 mm apart. This may cause an underestimation of, at most, 5 ms
(spatial component). In addition, it is possible that the earliest
captured stimulus (electrical stimuli applied randomly) may not reflect
the true earliest captured interval. For example, we do not know
whether a stimulus applied 1 ms before the "earliest" captured
beat would result in block. Our results show that the latest
noncaptured interval just immediately before the earliest captured beat
(Fig 12
) ranged between 6 and 18 ms, causing an average of 12 ms of
underestimation (temporal component). Although we do not know the exact
amount, the error in underestimating the excitable gap is
17 ms.
Conclusion
We conclude that a critically sized obstacle prevents
meandering of a reentrant atrial wave front by causing it to attach to
the obstacle. Arrest of meandering of a single reentrant wave front
converts polymorphic fibrillation-like activity to a monomorphic
flutter-like activity.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received April 21, 1997; accepted July 22, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Schuessler RB, Grayson TM, Bromberg BI, Cox JL,
Boineau JP. Cholinergically mediated
tachyarrhythmias induced by a single extrastimulus in
the isolated canine right atrium. Circ Res. 1992;71:1254-1267.
3.
Ikeda T, Wu T, Uchida T, Hough D, Fishbein MC, Mandel
WJ, Chen P, Karagueuzian HS. Meandering and unstable reentrant
wave fronts induced by acetylcholine in isolated canine right
atrium. Am J Physiol. 1997;273:H356-H370.
4.
Konings KTS, Kirchhof CJHJ, Smeets JRLM, Wellens HJJ,
Penn OC, Allessie MA. High-density mapping of electrically
induced atrial fibrillation in humans. Circulation. 1994;89:1665-1680.
5.
Pertsov AM, Davidenko JM, Salomonsz R, Baxter WT,
Jalife J. Spiral waves of excitation underlie reentrant activity
in isolated cardiac muscle. Circ Res. 1993;72:631-650.
6. Davidenko JM, Pertsov AM, Salomonsz R, Baxter WP, Jalife J. Spatiotemporal irregularities of spiral wave activity in isolated ventricular muscle. J Electrocardiol. 1992;24(suppl):113-122.
7.
Gray RA, Jalife J, Panfilov A, Baxter WT, Cabo C,
Davidenko JM, Pertsov AM. Nonstationary vortexlike reentrant
activity as mechanism of polymorphic ventricular
tachycardia in the isolated rabbit heart.
Circulation. 1995;91:2454-2469.
8. Starobin JM, Zilberter YI, Rusnak EM, Starmer CF. Wavelet formation in excitable cardiac tissue: the role of wavefront-obstacle interactions in initiating high-frequency fibrillatory-like arrhythmias. Biophys J. 1996;70:581-594.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Starobin JM, Starmer CF. A common mechanism links spiral wave meandering and wavefront-obstacle separation. Physical Rev E. 1997;55:1193-1196.
10. Lewis T. Mechanism and Graphic Registration of the Heart Beat. 3rd ed. Chicago, Ill: Chicago Book Co; 1924.
11.
Ortiz J, Niwano S, Abe H, Rudy Y, Johnson NJ, Waldo
AL. Mapping the conversion of atrial flutter to atrial
fibrillation and atrial fibrillation to atrial flutter: insights into
mechanisms. Circ Res. 1994;74:882-894.
12.
Ikeda T, Uchida T, Hough D, Lee JJ, Fishbein MC, Mandel
WJ, Chen P-S, Karagueuzian HS. Mechanism of spontaneous
termination of functional reentry in isolated canine right atrium:
evidence for the presence of an excitable but nonexcited core.
Circulation. 1996;94:1962-1973.
13. Ino T, Fishbein MC, Mandel WJ, Chen P, Karagueuzian HS. Cellular mechanisms of ventricular bipolar electrograms showing double and fractionated potentials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;4:1080-1089.
14.
Bonometti C, Hwang C, Hough D, Lee JJ, Fishbein MC,
Karagueuzian HS, Chen P-S. Interaction between strong electrical
stimulation and reentrant wavefronts in canine ventricular
fibrillation. Circ Res. 1995;77:407-416.
15.
Lee JJ, Kamjoo K, Hough D, Hwang C, Fan W, Fishbein MC,
Bonometti C, Ikeda T, Karagueuzian HS, Chen P-S. Reentrant wave
fronts in Wiggers' stage II ventricular fibrillation:
characteristics and mechanisms of termination and spontaneous
regeneration. Circ Res. 1996;78:660-675.
16.
Kobayashi Y, Peters W, Khan SS, Mandel WJ, Karagueuzian
HS. Cellular mechanisms of differential action potential
duration restitution in canine ventricular muscle cells
during single versus double premature stimuli.
Circulation. 1992;86:955-967.
17.
Karagueuzian HS, Khan SS, Hong K, Kobayashi Y, Denton
T, Mandel WJ, Diamond GA. Action potential alternans and
irregular dynamics in quinidine-intoxicated ventricular
muscle cells: implications for ventricular
proarrhythmia. Circulation. 1993;87:1661-1672.
18. Friedman P. GB-Stat. Silver Spring, Md: Dynamic Microsystems Inc; 1995.
19. Shimizu A, Nozaki A, Rudy Y, Waldo AL. Onset of induced atrial flutter in the canine pericarditis model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:1223-1234.[Abstract]
20. Watson RM, Josephson ME. Atrial flutter, I: electrophysiologic substrates and modes of initiation and termination. Am J Cardiol. 1980;45:732-741.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Waldo AL, Cooper TB. Spontaneous onset of type I atrial flutter in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:707-712.[Abstract]
22.
Cabo C, Pertsov AM, Baxter WT, Davidenko JM, Gray RA,
Jalife J. Wave-front curvature as a cause of slow conduction and
block in isolated cardiac muscle. Circ Res. 1994;75:1014-1028.
23. Ong JJC, Cha Y-M, Kriett JM, Boyce K, Feld GK, Chen P-S. The relation between atrial fibrillation wavefront characteristics and accessory pathway conduction. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:2284-2296.
24. Pertsov AM, Ermakova EA, Panfilov AV. Rotating spiral waves in a modified Fitzhugh-Nagumo model. Physica D. 1984;14:117-124.
25. Cabo C, Pertsov AM, Davidenko JM, Baxter WT, Gray RA, Jalife J. Vortex shedding as a precursor of turbulent electrical activity in cardiac muscle. Biophys J. 1996;70:1105-1111.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Starobin JM, Starmer CF. Boundary-layer analysis of waves propagating in an excitable medium: medium conditions for wave-front-obstacle separation. Physical Rev E. 1996;54:430-437.
27.
Spach MS, Miller WT, Dolber PC, Kootsey JM, Sommer JR,
Mosher CE. The functional role of structural complexities in the
propagation of depolarization in the atrium of the dog.
Circ Res. 1982;50:175-191.
28.
Girouard SD, Pastore JM, Laurita KR, Gregory KW,
Rosenbaum DS. Optical mapping in a new guinea pig model of
ventricular tachycardia reveals mechanisms for
multiple wavelengths in a single reentrant circuit.
Circulation. 1996;93:603-613.
29. Wiener N, Rosenblueth A. The mathematical formulation of the problem of conduction of impulses in a network of connected excitable elements, specifically in cardiac muscle. Arch Inst Cardiol Mex. 1946;16:205-265.
30. Tyson JJ, Keener JP. Singular perturbation theory of traveling waves in excitable media: a review. Physica D. 1988;32:327-361.
31.
Davidenko JM, Salomonsz R, Pertsov AM, Baxter WT,
Jalife J. Effects of pacing on stationary reentrant activity:
theoretical and experimental study. Circ Res. 1995;77:1166-1179.
32. Uchida T, Ikeda T, Kamjoo K, Hough D, Mandel WJ, Weiss JN, Chen P, Karagueuzian HS. Mechanism of acceleration of functional reentry in the ventricle. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol.. 1996;19:II-665. Abstract.
33. Dillon SM, Coromilas J, Waldecker B, Wit AL. Effects of overdrive stimulation on functional reentrant circuits causing ventricular tachycardia in the canine heart: mechanisms for resumption and alteration of tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1993;4:393-411.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Winfree AT. The electrical thresholds of normal ventricular myocardium. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1990;1:393-410.
35.
Gray RA, Jalife J, Panfilov AV, Baxter WT, Cabo C,
Davidenko JM, Pertsov AM, Hogeweg P. Mechanisms of cardiac
fibrillation. Science. 1995;270:1222-1223.
36.
Starmer CF, Romashko DN, Reddy RS, Zilberter YI,
Starobin J, Grant AO, Krinsky VI. Proarrhythmic response to
potassium channel blockade: numerical studies of polymorphic
tachyarrhythmias. Circulation. 1995;92:595-605.
37. Allessie MA, Lammers WJEP, Bonke FIM, Hollen J. Experimental evaluation of Moe's multiple wavelet hypothesis of atrial fibrillation. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, eds. Cardiac Arrhythmias. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton; 1985:265-276.
38. Moe GK. On the multiple wavelet hypothesis of atrial fibrillation. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther. 1962;140:183-188.
39. Winfree AT. Electrical instability in cardiac muscle: phase singularities and rotors. J Theor Biol. 1989;138:353-405.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Schuessler RB, Kawamoto T, Hand DE, Mitsuno M, Bromberg
BI, Cox JL, Boineau JP. Simultaneous
epicardial and endocardial activation sequence mapping in the isolated
canine atrium. Circulation. 1993;88:250-263.
41.
Gray RA, Pertsov AM, Jalife J. Incomplete
reentry and epicardial breakthrough patterns during atrial fibrillation
in the sheep heart. Circulation. 1996;94:2649-2661.
42.
Brugada J, Boersma L, Kirchhof CJ, Heynen VV, Allessie
MA. Reentrant excitation around a fixed obstacle in uniform
anisotropic ventricular myocardium.
Circulation. 1991;84:1296-1306.
43.
Allessie MA, Bonke FIM, Schopman FJG. Circus
movement in rabbit atrial muscle as a mechanism of
tachycardia. Circ Res. 1973;33:54-62.
44.
Allessie MA, Bonke FI, Schopman FJ. Circus
movement in rabbit atrial muscle as a mechanism of
tachycardia, III: the `leading circle' concept: a new
model of circus movement in cardiac tissue without the involvement of
an anatomical obstacle. Circ Res. 1977;41:9-18.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Agladze, M. W. Kay, V. Krinsky, and N. Sarvazyan Interaction between spiral and paced waves in cardiac tissue Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): H503 - H513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Y. Lim, B. Maskara, F. Aguel, R. Emokpae Jr, and L. Tung Spiral Wave Attachment to Millimeter-Sized Obstacles Circulation, November 14, 2006; 114(20): 2113 - 2121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-R. Neuberger, U. Schotten, Y. Blaauw, D. Vollmann, S. Eijsbouts, A. van Hunnik, and M. Allessie Chronic Atrial Dilation, Electrical Remodeling, and Atrial Fibrillation in the Goat J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 7, 2006; 47(3): 644 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Zou, J. Kneller, L. J. Leon, and S. Nattel Substrate size as a determinant of fibrillatory activity maintenance in a mathematical model of canine atrium Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2005; 289(3): H1002 - H1012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zhou, L. S. Chen, Y. Miyauchi, M. Miyauchi, S. Kar, S. Kangavari, M. C. Fishbein, B. Sharifi, and P.-S. Chen Mechanisms of Cardiac Nerve Sprouting After Myocardial Infarction in Dogs Circ. Res., July 9, 2004; 95(1): 76 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-N. Pak, Y.-S. Oh, Y.-B. Liu, T.-J. Wu, H. S. Karagueuzian, S.-F. Lin, and P.-S. Chen Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Fibrillation in Rabbit Ventricles Treated With {beta}-Blockers Circulation, December 23, 2003; 108(25): 3149 - 3156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Derksen, H. V.M. van Rijen, R. Wilders, S. Tasseron, R. N.W. Hauer, W. L.C. Rutten, and J. M.T. de Bakker Tissue Discontinuities Affect Conduction Velocity Restitution: A Mechanism by Which Structural Barriers May Promote Wave Break Circulation, August 19, 2003; 108(7): 882 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Iravanian, Y. Nabutovsky, C.-R. Kong, S. Saha, N. Bursac, and L. Tung Functional reentry in cultured monolayers of neonatal rat cardiac cells Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 5, 2003; 285(1): H449 - H456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yashima, Y.-H. Kim, S. Armin, T.-J. Wu, Y. Miyauchi, W. J. Mandel, P.-S. Chen, and H. S. Karagueuzian On the mechanism of the probabilistic nature of ventricular defibrillation threshold Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2003; 284(1): H249 - H255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ohara, Z. Qu, M.-H. Lee, K. Ohara, C. Omichi, W. J. Mandel, P.-S. Chen, and H. S. Karagueuzian Increased vulnerability to inducible atrial fibrillation caused by partial cellular uncoupling with heptanol Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2002; 283(3): H1116 - H1122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Berenfeld, A. V. Zaitsev, S. F. Mironov, A. M. Pertsov, and J. Jalife Frequency-Dependent Breakdown of Wave Propagation Into Fibrillatory Conduction Across the Pectinate Muscle Network in the Isolated Sheep Right Atrium Circ. Res., June 14, 2002; 90(11): 1173 - 1180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kneller, R. Zou, E. J. Vigmond, Z. Wang, L. J. Leon, and S. Nattel Cholinergic Atrial Fibrillation in a Computer Model of a Two-Dimensional Sheet of Canine Atrial Cells With Realistic Ionic Properties Circ. Res., May 17, 2002; 90 (9): e73 - e87. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-J. Wu, Y.-H. Kim, M. Yashima, C. A. Athill, C.-T. Ting, H. S. Karagueuzian, and P.-S. Chen Progressive action potential duration shortening and the conversion from atrial flutter to atrial fibrillation in the isolated canine right atrium J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2001; 38(6): 1757 - 1765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Spach Mechanisms of the Dynamics of Reentry in a Fibrillating Myocardium : Developing a Genes-to-Rotors Paradigm Circ. Res., April 27, 2001; 88(8): 753 - 755. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ohara, K. Ohara, J.-M. Cao, M.-H. Lee, M. C. Fishbein, W. J. Mandel, P.-S. Chen, and H. S. Karagueuzian Increased Wave Break During Ventricular Fibrillation in the Epicardial Border Zone of Hearts With Healed Myocardial Infarction Circulation, March 13, 2001; 103(10): 1465 - 1472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Xie, Z. Qu, A. Garfinkel, and J. N. Weiss Electrophysiological heterogeneity and stability of reentry in simulated cardiac tissue Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2001; 280(2): H535 - H545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Valderrabano, Y.-H. Kim, M. Yashima, T.-J. Wu, H. S. Karagueuzian, and P.-S. Chen Obstacle-induced transition from ventricular fibrillation to tachycardia in isolated swine right ventricles: Insights into the transition dynamics and implications for the critical mass J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 15, 2000; 36(6): 2000 - 2008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yashima, T. Ohara, J.-M. Cao, Y.-H. Kim, M. C. Fishbein, W. J. Mandel, P.-S. Chen, and H. S. Karagueuzian Nicotine increases ventricular vulnerability to fibrillation in hearts with healed myocardial infarction Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2000; 278(6): H2124 - H2133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Scheinman Mechanisms of atrial fibrillation: is a cure at hand? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2000; 35(6): 1687 - 1692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. H. Samie, R. Mandapati, R. A. Gray, Y. Watanabe, C. Zuur, J. Beaumont, and J. Jalife A Mechanism of Transition From Ventricular Fibrillation to Tachycardia : Effect of Calcium Channel Blockade on the Dynamics of Rotating Waves Circ. Res., March 31, 2000; 86(6): 684 - 691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mandapati, A. Skanes, J. Chen, O. Berenfeld, and J. Jalife Stable Microreentrant Sources as a Mechanism of Atrial Fibrillation in the Isolated Sheep Heart Circulation, January 18, 2000; 101(2): 194 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-H. Kim, F. Xie, M. Yashima, T.-J. Wu, M. Valderrabano, M.-H. Lee, T. Ohara, O. Voroshilovsky, R. N. Doshi, M. C. Fishbein, et al. Role of Papillary Muscle in the Generation and Maintenance of Reentry During Ventricular Tachycardia and Fibrillation in Isolated Swine Right Ventricle Circulation, September 28, 1999; 100(13): 1450 - 1459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. N. Doshi, T.-J. Wu, M. Yashima, Y.-H. Kim, J. J. C. Ong, J.-M. Cao, C. Hwang, P. Yashar, M. C. Fishbein, H. S. Karagueuzian, et al. Relation Between Ligament of Marshall and Adrenergic Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Circulation, August 24, 1999; 100(8): 876 - 883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-H. Kim, M. Yashima, T.-J. Wu, R. Doshi, P.-S. Chen, and H. S. Karagueuzian Mechanism of Procainamide-Induced Prevention of Spontaneous Wave Break During Ventricular Fibrillation : Insight Into the Maintenance of Fibrillation Wave Fronts Circulation, August 10, 1999; 100(6): 666 - 674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Weiss, A. Garfinkel, H. S. Karagueuzian, Z. Qu, and P.-S. Chen Chaos and the Transition to Ventricular Fibrillation : A New Approach to Antiarrhythmic Drug Evaluation Circulation, June 1, 1999; 99(21): 2819 - 2826. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Uchida, M. Yashima, M. Gotoh, Z. Qu, A. Garfinkel, J. N. Weiss, M. C. Fishbein, W. J. Mandel, P.-S. Chen, and H. S. Karagueuzian Mechanism of Acceleration of Functional Reentry in the Ventricle : Effects of ATP-Sensitive Potassium Channel Opener Circulation, February 9, 1999; 99(5): 704 - 712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Athill, T. Ikeda, Y.-H. Kim, T.-J. Wu, M. C. Fishbein, H. S. Karagueuzian, and P.-S. Chen Transmembrane Potential Properties at the Core of Functional Reentrant Wave Fronts in Isolated Canine Right Atria Circulation, October 13, 1998; 98(15): 1556 - 1567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Valderrabano, M.-H. Lee, T. Ohara, A. C. Lai, M. C. Fishbein, S.-F. Lin, H. S. Karagueuzian, and P.-S. Chen Dynamics of Intramural and Transmural Reentry During Ventricular Fibrillation in Isolated Swine Ventricles Circ. Res., April 27, 2001; 88(8): 839 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |