Articles |
-Nitro-L-Arginine Methyl Ester Treatment Improves Survival Rate and Decreases Myocardial Injury in a Murine Model of Viral Myocarditis Induced by Coxsackievirus B3
From the First Department of Internal Medicine (S.M., S.K., K.K., K.H., M.Y.), the Department of Microbiology (H.H.), and the First Department of Pathology (Y.H., H.I.), Kobe (Japan) University School of Medicine.
Correspondence to Seinosuke Kawashima, MD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Kobe University School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650 Japan.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester
(L-NAME) for 14 days after virus inoculation. This dose of L-NAME did
not change virus titers in the heart. However, L-NAMEfed mice showed
a significant reduction in mortality compared with those fed normal
drinking water (nontreated mice). On the contrary, mice given a higher
concentration of L-NAME (3.7 mmol/L) exhibited increased
mortality. In addition, mice fed a low concentration of L-NAME showed
reductions in the severity of heart failure and in the area of
myocardial necrosis. Although systemic blood pressure was reduced in
nontreated mice, in mice fed a low concentration of L-NAME, it was
maintained at a level similar to that in uninfected control mice.
L-NAMEtreated mice also exhibited a reduction in the degree of
inflammatory cell infiltration associated with decreased
production of tissue prostaglandin E2
levels in the heart compared with nontreated mice. Therefore, NO is
likely to be involved in the pathogenic mechanisms of myocardial injury
and resultant cardiac dysfunction in a murine model of coxsackievirus
B3induced viral myocarditis.
Key Words: N
-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester nitric oxide viral myocarditis prostaglandin
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In viral myocarditis, the myocytes are first damaged by the direct cytolytic effect of the virus after viral infection.10 Then, the cell-mediated immunological responses play a predominant role in the inflammatory process and subsequent myocardial damage. Natural killer cells and cytotoxic T cells are suggested to be involved in the mechanisms.11 12 However, biochemical mechanisms of cell-mediated immune responses are still not well understood. In addition to its action as a vasodilator to maintain tissue perfusion, NO has been reported to exert an inhibitory effect on viral replication. NO is also shown to act as a cytotoxic molecule, modulate cardiac contractility, and influence cardiac function.13 14 15 16 Because of these multiple actions, NO produced in the inflammatory tissue may play either a protective or a detrimental role in the pathogenesis of viral myocarditis. A recent report showed that inhibition of NOS enhanced viral replication and resulted in an increase in the mortality in the murine model of viral myocarditis.17 On the other hand, another report suggested the cytotoxic effect of NO in the murine model of viral myocarditis.18 In a model of autoimmune myocarditis in rats, NO contributed to the progression of myocardial damage.19 20
The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of long-term supplementation of a NOS inhibitor after virus infection on the extent of myocardial injury and on the mortality rate in a murine model of viral myocarditis induced by CVB3. For this purpose, we fed mice a relatively low concentration of the NOS inhibitor L-NAME in their drinking water to yield low-dose L-NAME treatment (0.37 mmol/L). The results of the present study demonstrated that low-dose L-NAME treatment improved the mortality and decreased myocardial injury, whereas high-dose L-NAME (3.7 mmol/L) increased mortality; the study also suggested that NO acts as an important modulating factor of myocardial inflammation and injury in viral myocarditis.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animals and Virus Inoculation
Three-week-old C3H/He male mice (Nippon Clea Co, Osaka,
Japan) were inoculated intraperitoneally with
either 1x105 or 5x106 pfu CVB3 in 0.5 mL PBS.
For examining mortality rate after virus inoculation, we used
5x106 pfu, which was revealed to produce death in 50% of
the animals in the preliminary study. For examinations of
histopathological changes in the heart, systemic blood pressure, virus
titers, and PGE2 levels, we inoculated mice with
1x105 pfu CVB3, which resulted in low mortality rate
(
5%). The day of inoculation was defined as day 0 in the following
study.
Effect of L-NAME on Mortality After Viral Inoculation
We examined the effect of inhibiting NO production
during the process of viral myocarditis on mortality. After receiving
5x106 pfu CVB3, mice were randomly classified into two
groups, a nontreated group and a group treated with L-NAME. Feeding of
L-NAME (0.37 mmol/L) was started on the day of virus
inoculation and continued until the animals were killed on day 14. The
first group of mice was fed untreated (without L-NAME)
drinking water (nontreated group, n=42). In the other group, L-NAME was
dissolved in the drinking water at a concentration of 100 mg/L
(0.37 mmol/L), yielding a daily intake of
5 to 10
mg/kg of L-NAME in each mouse (low-dose L-NAMEfed group,
n=43). In these two groups of animals, mortality on 14 days after virus
inoculation (5x106 pfu) was compared. In addition, we
examined the effect of a higher concentration of L-NAME on the
mortality after virus inoculation. For this purpose, we fed a
relatively high concentration of L-NAME (3.7 mmol/L) to
another group of infected (5x106 pfu CVB3) mice (high-dose
L-NAMEfed group, n=32).
Effects of L-NAME on Histopathological Changes
In another set of experiments, we studied the effects of NO
synthesis inhibition on the extent of myocardial damage in viral
myocarditis. As in the mortality protocol, either low-dose (0.37
mmol/L, n=50) or high-dose (3.7 mmol/L, n=90)
L-NAME feeding was started on the day of virus inoculation
(1x105 pfu) and was continued until the animals died or
were killed for study. Nontreated infected mice (n=50) were also used
for the examination. In addition, another group of mice (n=8) was given
drinking water containing D-NAME (0.37 mmol/L) after virus
inoculation. For comparison of body and heart weights and cardiac
pathological changes, saline injection instead of virus inoculation was
performed in 6 uninfected control mice that received distilled water,
in 10 uninfected mice fed low-dose L-NAME (0.37 mmol/L),
and in 10 uninfected mice fed high-dose L-NAME (3.7
mmol/L).
After the mice were killed, body weights were determined, the hearts were removed, and heart weights were determined. The hearts were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded in paraffin, and two 5-µm-thick slices were taken at the papillary muscle level. The myocardial sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Masson's trichrome. Using these sections, two independent researchers operating in a blind manner examined the extent of inflammatory cell infiltration and the area of myocardial necrosis. Because the lesions of necrosis, inflammatory cell infiltration, and fibrosis overlapped each other and clear differentiation of each lesion was difficult, we measured the total area, including necrosis, inflammatory cell infiltration, and fibrosis, and defined it as the area of necrosis. For the determination of total myocardial area and the area of necrosis, we took pictures of each section, magnified its original size by x40 using a computerized image analyzer, and then determined the margin of the area to trace. After obtaining each area by planimetry, percent necrotic area was calculated by dividing the sum of area of necrosis by the whole myocardial area of each section. The determination of the margin was sometimes difficult, but the interobserver difference in the measured area was <10%. The mean of two sections from one heart was used for statistical analysis.
We also semiquantitatively evaluated the degree of inflammatory cell infiltration in each section by using the pathological grade as described previously.21 Pathological grade was determined as follows: grade 1 (mild), one or two small foci in the whole myocardial area; grade 2 (slight), several small foci; grade 3 (moderate), multiple small foci or several large foci; grade 4 (severe), multiple large foci; and grade 5 (very severe), diffuse infiltration, necrosis, or calcification. If the grading score for each specimen differed between the two examiners, the third examiner decided the grading score. In each group, subsets of mice were killed on day 3 for examination of early pathological changes, on day 7 for pathological grading of cellular infiltration, and on day 14 for measurement of percent necrotic area and the pathological grade. D-NAMEfed and uninfected control mice were killed on day 14. In addition, histological examinations were also performed in some of the deceased mice used in "mortality protocol."
Effect of L-NAME Treatment on Systemic Blood Pressure During
Myocarditis
We measured systemic blood pressure in both control and infected
conscious mice (n=5 for each group). Mice were anesthetized
with pentobarbital sodium (80 mg/kg). With the mouse supine, a
1-cm inguinal incision was made under a microscope, and the right
femoral artery was isolated from surrounding structures. The
polyethylene catheter (single lumen SP8, Natsume Japan) was then
inserted into the artery. The catheter was advanced to a 0.5-cm depth
and secured in place. The catheter was then flushed with heparinized
saline (100 U/mL saline), sealed with cyanoacrylate glue, tunneled to
the back of the mouse, and tucked into a subcutaneous pocket on the
back. The incision was sutured with 6-0 surgical silk. The mice were
then allowed to recover in a standard rodent cage with food and water
available ad libitum for 24 hours. After removal from the subcutaneous
pocket, the arterial catheter was connected to a pressure
transducer (MLT1050, AD Instruments Japan). Blood pressure was
analyzed with Mac Lab/4s (AD Instruments Japan). Baseline mean
blood pressure measurement was started 24 hours after surgery and
continued for a total of 3 hours when the mice were noted to be quietly
resting and not sleeping or engaging in grooming or feeding activities.
The average value of blood pressure obtained during this period was
used for the assessment.22 23
Virus Titer in the Heart
For the infectivity assay, hearts of the infected mice
(1x105 pfu) were removed aseptically on days 2, 3, 6, 10,
and 14, and virus titers in the heart were measured in the nontreated
and the low-dose L-NAME (0.37 mmol/L)fed groups. We also
examined virus titers in hearts from the high-dose L-NAME (3.7
mmol/L)fed group. In each examination, 5 mice were used. The
whole heart was weighed and homogenized in 1 mL of MEM.
After centrifuging at 1500g for 10 minutes at 4°C, 0.1 mL
of supernatant was inoculated into Vero cells for 60 minutes at 37°C
in 5% CO2. Cells were then overlaid with 4 mL of medium
containing MEM and 10% methylcellulose. After 4 days of incubation at
37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2, cells
were stained with crystal violet, and plaques were counted with a
microscope. The myocardial virus titer was expressed as
log10 pfu/mg.
Effect of L-NAME Treatment on Prostaglandin
Production in the Heart
Since proinflammatory prostaglandins play an
important role in the early phase of inflammation and NO is reported to
inhibit them,24 25 we measured tissue PGE2
levels in both nontreated and low-dose L-NAMEfed mice
(1x105 pfu). In the L-NAMEfed group, L-NAME (0.37
mmol/L) feeding was started on the day of virus inoculation and
was continued until death. On day 4 and day 7, 5 mice in each group
were killed so that tissue PGE2 levels could be assessed.
After excising the heart, the specimens were homogenized in
1 mL of PBS containing 1.8% indomethacin, frozen in
liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C. The concentrations of
PGE2 were determined by specific radioimmunoassay using the
125I-PGE2 assay system (Amersham). The
cross-reactivity of other prostaglandins with the antisera
was as follows: 6-ketoprostaglandin F1, 0.04%;
thromboxane B2, 0.08%. The concentration was
expressed as picograms per milligram tissue.
Statistical Analysis
Survival curves of infected mice were obtained by the
Kaplan-Meier method. The survival curves were evaluated by Mantel-Cox
log-rank test.
2 analysis was used to
compare the mortality rate between the groups. Statistical
analysis of body weight, heart weight, heart weighttobody
weight ratio, the pathological grade and percent necrotic area, blood
pressure, virus titers, and prostaglandin
production was performed by one-way ANOVA (Bonferroni).
Differences were considered statistically significant at
P<.05. Results are expressed as mean±SEM.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
On the other hand, when the infected mice were treated with high-dose
L-NAME (3.7 mmol/L),
60% of the mice died on day 3,
80% of the mice were lost before day 4, and almost all mice died by
day 7. The postmortem pathological examination of the mice that died on
day 3 (n=10) revealed no distinct microscopic findings of myocardial
necrosis or cellular infiltration in the heart. In addition,
macroscopic examination of the whole body revealed no distinct
abnormalities, such as bleeding, in any organ.
Cardiac Histopathology
Ten nontreated, 10 low-dose L-NAMEfed, and 10 high-dose
L-NAMEfed mice were killed on day 3; 15 nontreated, 13 low-dose
L-NAMEfed, and all 6 surviving high-dose L-NAMEfed mice were killed
on day 7; and 23 nontreated and 24 low-dose L-NAMEfed mice were
killed on day 14. The inflammatory process of infected mice in these
groups was in accordance with previous reports. On day 3, a few
scattered small foci of myocyte necrosis were noted. The myocardial
necrosis and cell infiltration were extensive on day 7. Infiltration of
the inflammatory cells was decreased, and necrotic
myocardium gradually changed to fibrosis and calcification
on day 14, as was reported previously.26 27 Along with
these histopathological changes, the infected mice decreased their body
weight (infected mice [nontreated], 16.5±3.9 g; uninfected mice,
21.3±0.4 g; P<.05; on day 14). The heart weight of the
infected mice showed a significant increase compared with that of the
uninfected mice (infected mice, 0.11±0.02 g; uninfected mice,
0.09±0.04 g; P<.05; on day 14) (Table 1
). The infected hearts, with enlarged
cardiac cavities, consisted of necrotic foci surrounded by infiltrating
cells and interstitial edema.
|
As in the high virus titerinoculated mice, mice inoculated with
low virus titers (1x105 pfu) experienced high mortality
after high-dose L-NAME treatment. Approximately 50% of the mice died
by day 3, and only 10% of the mice survived on day 7. Examinations of
10 high-dose L-NAMEtreated mice surviving on day 3 revealed the
presence of small necrotic foci, but the area of necrosis was not
different from that in the other two groups. There was no
pulmonary congestion in any of three groups on day 3. The mice
surviving on day 7 demonstrated the presence of necrosis and cell
infiltration. The areas of necrosis and cell infiltration of the
surviving mice were small compared with those in the other two groups
(Fig 2
). However, because of the high mortality, it was not possible to
collect sufficient data for quantitative histopathological
analysis in high-dose L-NAMEfed mice; the use of surviving
animals of limited number may bias the data analysis.
Therefore, the quantitative analysis on day 7 was performed in
only low-dose L-NAMEfed and nontreated mice. When the infected mice
were treated with low-dose L-NAME (0.37 mol/L),
the body weight was bigger and heart weight was smaller compared with
the nontreated infected mice (Table 1
). In addition, macroscopic
findings of heart failure, such as pleural effusion or congestion of
the lung, were observed in 4 of the 23 nontreated mice,
whereas none of the low-dose L-NAMEfed mice showed such
findings.
|
Histopathological examination revealed a remarkable reduction in the
percent necrotic area in the low-dose L-NAMEfed group compared with
the nontreated infected group (no treatment, 22.4±6.8%; low-dose
L-NAME, 11.9±4.6%; P<.05) (Figs 2
and 3a
).
Because the disease demonstrated the focal nature and because
infiltrated cells were intermingled in the inflammatory lesions, the
quantitative cell type identification in the inflammatory area in each
animal was difficult. Therefore, we did not determine whether there was
a change in the infiltrated cell types by low-dose L-NAME treatment. We
evaluated the extent of inflammatory cell infiltration by
semiquantitative analysis. The pathological grading revealed a
significant reduction of the extent of cell infiltration on day 7 and
on day 14 in low-dose L-NAMEfed mice (Fig 3b
).
|
There were no necrotic lesions or cell infiltration in the hearts of uninfected control mice. Likewise, neither necrosis, cell infiltration, nor fibrosis was detected in uninfected mice treated with low-dose or high-dose L-NAME. D-NAME treatment did not change the area of myocardial necrosis and the degree of cell infiltration. On the other hand, histopathological examination in the deceased mice in the "mortality protocol" revealed the presence of intensive myocardial necrosis and fibrosis in both low-dose L-NAMEfed and nontreated mice.
Blood Pressure in Mice
Blood pressure was low immediately after anesthesia
and remained low for at least 2 hours compared with 24 hours later.
Table 2
shows the changes in mean blood
pressure after virus inoculation and the effects of L-NAME
treatment. High-dose L-NAME treatment for 14 days increased mean blood
pressure in control (uninfected) mice (93±4 versus 122±4 mm Hg,
P<.01), and low-dose L-NAME for 14 days also increased
blood pressure significantly (93±4 versus 106±4 mm Hg,
P<.01). In nontreated infected mice, blood pressure was
decreased on days 7 and 14 after virus inoculation, probably because of
myocardial damage and/or heart failure. Blood pressure of low-dose
L-NAMEfed mice was significantly higher compared with that of
nontreated mice on day 7 and day 14. On the other hand, on day 3, when
high-dose L-NAMEfed mice began to die, there were no significant
differences in blood pressure among three groups (nontreated, low-dose
L-NAMEfed, and high-dose L-NAMEfed groups).
|
Myocardial Virus Titer
Virus content was not detected in the noninfected mice. No
differences were found in the virus content on days 2, 3, 6, 10, and 14
between the nontreated and the low-dose L-NAMEfed groups. Even on day
6, when the virus replication in the heart is at its peak, there were
no statistical differences in the virus titers between low-dose
L-NAMEfed and nontreated mice (Table 3
). In the high-dose L-NAMEfed group,
virus titers were examined only on day 3, because most of the animals
died thereafter. On day 3, there were no statistical differences in
virus titers between high-dose L-NAMEfed and nontreated groups.
However, since we measured virus titers in mice surviving on day 3 (5
of 10 mice inoculated), we could not rule out the possibility that the
titers might be increased in the deceased animals.
|
Tissue Prostaglandin Levels in the Heart
L-NAME treatment decreased the production of
proinflammatory prostaglandins. We measured tissue
PGE2 levels on day 4, the early stage of inflammation, and
on day 7, when the inflammatory cell infiltration was most extensive.
The tissue PGE2 levels in low-dose L-NAMEfed mice were
significantly reduced compared with those in nontreated mice on days 4
and 7 (Fig 4
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As one of the mechanisms of myocardial destruction of viral myocarditis, the direct cytolytic effect of the virus on myocytes plays an important role in the early phase after virus inoculation.27 Viral replication causes myocardial necrosis with inflammation in the heart. Experimental studies in vitro have shown an inhibitory effect of NO on viral replication.28 The antiviral-replication effect of NO is suggested to be mediated by its inhibitory action on viral ribonucleotide reductase.29 Therefore, it was possible that an inhibition of NO synthesis resulted in the worsening of myocardial damage. Indeed, the recent report of Lowenstein et al17 showed that mice with CVB3-induced viral myocarditis had increased myocardial virus titers and a higher mortality when treated with NOS inhibitors. However, in the present study, we found that low-dose L-NAME treatment had no effects on viral titers in the heart throughout the observation period of 2 weeks after virus inoculation. In accordance with the present study, Akaike et al30 reported that in mice with influenza virusinduced pneumonia, L-NMMA, a NOS inhibitor, significantly improved the survival rate without suppression of virus replications in the lung. The difference between the study of Lowenstein et al and ours seems at least in part due to the dose of NOS synthesis inhibitor given to the animal. In the study of Lowenstein et al, they fed mice relatively high concentrations of L-NAME (10 and 100 mmol/L), whereas we gave them a low concentration of L-NAME (0.37 mmol/L). Lowenstein et al found unchanged myocardial virus titers when the concentration of given L-NMMA was <10 mmol/L. In addition, a relatively high concentration of NO was shown to be required to inhibit viral replication.28 Therefore, although NO was produced in the heart, the concentration of NO produced in the heart might not be high enough to inhibit viral replication.
The difference in the dose also likely accounts for the discrepancy between the present study and that of Lowenstein et al17 involving the effect of L-NAME on the mortality of mice with viral myocarditis. Indeed, when we fed the infected mice high-dose L-NAME (3.7 mmol/L), almost all of them died by 7 days after virus inoculation. Although we found unchanged myocardial virus titers in high-dose L-NAMEtreated mice on day 3 in spite of increased mortality, we could not rule out the possibility that there might occur increased viral replication between days 4 and 7.
There are several mechanisms that may contribute to the beneficial effects of low-dose L-NAME treatment on viral myocarditis in the present study. First, an improvement of tissue perfusion by NO synthesis inhibition must be taken into account. We found that even the low-dose L-NAME increased blood pressure. The nontreated infected mice showed reductions of blood pressure on days 7 and 14, which probably represented the hemodynamic deterioration due to myocardial damage and resultant heart failure. However, the low-dose L-NAMEfed infected mice exhibited significantly higher mean blood pressure than did the nontreated mice on days 7 and 14. Therefore, the low-dose L-NAME used in the present study likely served to improve tissue perfusion, particularly when the animals were in heart failure or shock state, and resulted in the improvement of survival rate.
Next, it is shown that NO produced in neutrophils or macrophages acts as a cytotoxic molecule in some circumstances. The induction of iNOS has been demonstrated in various types of autoimmune complex injury and inflammatory reactions.31 32 In those pathological conditions, NO may be involved in the production of tissue damage and edema.33 NO is shown to inhibit mitochondrial respiratory chain reaction, aconitase of the Krebs cycle, and synthesis of DNA by inactivating ribonucleotide reductase.34 Moreover, NO may combine with oxygen-derived free radicals to form peroxynitrite and further change to hydroxy radicals.35 These radicals are potent cytotoxic molecules and thereby may participate in the mechanisms of myocyte destruction.36 In the present study, L-NAME treatment decreased the area of myocardial necrosis and fibrosis. Therefore, it is possible that a large amount of NO produced in the heart plays a crucial role in myocardial destruction in viral myocarditis and that an inhibition of NO production results in the amelioration of myocardial damage.
In addition to the augmentation of the inflammatory and cytotoxic process, NO produced in the heart may decrease ventricular function and thus aggravate heart failure. Brady et al15 showed in isolated cardiac myocytes that endogenously produced NO from endothelium attenuated the contraction of myocytes. Moreover, NO produced by the cardiac myocyte itself has been shown to act as an autocrine factor to reduce myocardial contractility. Balligand et al37 reported an augmentation of inotropic response to ß-adrenergic agonists by administration of the NO synthesis inhibitor L-NMMA. The improved survival rate by L-NAME observed in the present study may be partially related to the augmentation of cardiac function by this drug. Although we did not measure cardiac function in the present study, the preserved blood pressure in low-dose L-NAMEfed mice may indicate improved cardiac function, and the improved cardiac function may also be related to the reduced myocardial damage by NO synthesis inhibition.
On the other hand, NO has been demonstrated to augment the production of proinflammatory prostaglandins in the tissue with inflammation, and NOS inhibitors reduce them. NO may exaggerate the inflammatory process by the generation of additional proinflammatory prostaglandin, which enables inflammatory cells to reach the lesion of inflammation.24 25 In the present study, we found reduction in inflammatory cell infiltration in the inflammatory area and decreased tissue PGE2 levels by low-dose L-NAME treatment. Recently, Salvemini et al38 used the rat carrageenan-stimulated air pouch model and reported that the anti-inflammatory mechanisms of NO synthesis inhibitors are partly mediated by the inhibition of prostaglandin production and cellular infiltration. Although the reduced prostaglandin production may represent the result of decreased inflammation, it is possible that the beneficial anti-inflammatory effects of low-dose L-NAME treatment are in part mediated by the inhibition of proinflammatory prostaglandin.
Finally, we found increased mortality in high-dose L-NAMEfed mice. It seemed that NO synthesis inhibition resulted in biphasic effects depending on the dose used. We measured blood pressure in these animals on day 3, when they began to die, and found that blood pressure values were not different from those of control mice. Therefore, the high-dose L-NAMEtreated mice were neither in excess hypertensive condition nor in shock state on day 3, nor did the high mortality seem to be the result of increased myocardial damage. Indeed, we found no pulmonary congestion and no lethal necrotic foci in mice treated with high-dose L-NAME on day 3. Thus, although we cannot completely exclude the possibility of increased viral replication, the high mortality may have resulted from either the toxic effect of this agent or yet-unknown mechanism(s). Further studies to clarify the mechanism of high mortality induced by high-dose L-NAME treatment are needed.
Our results suggest that NO can be regarded as a common important
modulating factor of myocardial damage in various pathological
conditions mediated by immune and inflammatory processes. Furthermore,
recent clinical studies demonstrated induction of iNOS in the heart of
patients with heart failure, and locally produced cytokines
such as tumor necrosis factor-
are suggested to be responsible for
the induction.39 NO produced in the heart may also be
involved in pathophysiology other than viral myocarditis.
| Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 23, 1997; accepted July 5, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Nathan C. Nitric oxide as a secretory product of mammalian cells. FASEB J. 1992;6:3051-3064.[Abstract]
3.
Dinerman JL, Lowenstein CJ, Snyder SH.
Molecular mechanisms of nitric oxide regulation: potential relevance to
cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 1993;73:217-222.
4. Nathan C, Xie QW. Nitric oxide synthases: roles, tolls, and controls. Cell. 1994;78:915-918.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Forstermann U, Schmidt HHHW, Pollock JS. Isoforms of nitric oxide synthase. Biochem Pharmacol. 1991;42:1849-1857.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Hirata K, Kuroda R, Sakoda T, Katayama M, Inoue N,
Suematsu M, Kawashima S, Yokoyama M. Inhibition of
endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity by protein
kinase C. Hypertension. 1995;25:180-185.
7. Kanazawa K, Kawashima S, Mikami S, Miwa Y, Hirata K, Suematsu M, Hayashi Y, Itoh H, Yokoyama M. Endothelial constitutive nitric oxide synthase protein and mRNA increased in rabbit atherosclerotic aorta despite impaired endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation. Am J Pathol. 1996;148:1949-1956.[Abstract]
8.
Koide M, Kawahara Y, Nakayama I, Tsuda T, Yokoyama
M. Cyclic AMP elevating agents induce an inducible type of
nitric oxide synthase expression in vascular smooth muscle.
J Biol Chem. 1993;268:24959-24966.
9. Mikami S, Kawashima S, Kanazawa K, Hirata K, Katayama Y, Hotta H, Hayashi Y, Ito H, Yokoyama M. Expression of nitric oxide synthase in a murine model of viral myocarditis induced by coxsackievirus B3. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996;220:983-989.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Estrin M, Huber SA. Coxsackievirus B3-induced myocarditis. Am J Pathol. 1987;127:335-341.[Abstract]
11.
Woodruff JF, Woodruff JJ. Involvement of T
lymphocytes in the pathogenesis of coxsackievirus B3 heart
disease. J Immunol. 1974;113:1726-1734.
12. Seko Y, Shinkai Y, Kawasaki A, Yagita H, Okumura K, Yazaki Y. Evidence of perforin mediated cardiac myocyte injury in acute murine myocarditis caused by coxsackievirus B3. J Pathol. 1993;170:53-58.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Stamler JS, Singel DJ, Loscalzo J. Biochemistry
of nitric oxide and its redox-activated form.
Science. 1992;258:1898-1902.
14. Schmidt HHH, Walter U. NO at work. Cell. 1994;78:919-925.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Brady AJ, Wilson PA, Harding SE, Warren JB. Nitric oxide production within cardiac myocytes reduces their contractility in endotoxemia. Am J Pathol. 1992;263:H1963-H1966.
16.
Finkel MS, Oddis CV, Jacob TD, Watkins SC, Hattler BG,
Simmons RL. Negative inotropic effects of cytokines on
the heart mediated by nitric oxide. Science. 1992;257:387-389.
17. Lowenstein CJ, Hill SL, Lafond-Walker A, Wu J, Allen G, Landavere M, Rose NR, Herskowitz A. Nitric oxide inhibits viral replication in murine myocarditis. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:1837-1843.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Wang WZ, Matsumori A, Yamada T, Shioi T, Okada I,
Matsui S, Sato Y, Suzuki H, Shiota K, Sasayama S. Beneficial
effects of amlodipine in a murine model of congestive heart failure
induced by viral myocarditis. Circulation. 1997;95:245-251.
19.
Ishiyama S, Hiroe M, Nishikawa T, Abe S, Shimojo T, Ito
H, Ozawa S, Yamakawa K, Matsuzaki M, Mohammed MU, Nakazawa H, Kasajima
T, Marumo F. Nitric oxide contributes to the progression of
myocardial damage in experimental autoimmune myocarditis in
rats. Circulation. 1997;95:489-496.
20.
Hirono S, Islam MO, Nakazawa M, Yoshida Y, Kodama M,
Shibata A, Izumi T, Imai S. Expression of inducible nitric oxide
synthase in rat experimental autoimmune myocarditis with special
reference to changes in cardiac hemodynamics.
Circ Res. 1997;80:11-20.
21.
Hiraoka Y, Kishimoto C, Takada H, Sasayama S.
Role of oxygen derived free radicals in the pathogenesis of
coxsackievirus B3 in mice. Cardiovasc Res. 1993;27:957-961.
22. Kurihara Y, Kurihara H, Suzuki H, Kodama T, Maemura K, Nagai R, Oda H, Kuwaki T, Cao WH, Kamada N, Jishage K, Ouchi Y, Azuma S, Toyoda Y, Ishikawa T, Kunmada M, Yazaki Y. Elevated blood pressure and craniofacial abnormalities in mice deficient in endothelin-1. Nature. 1994;368:703-710.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Desai KH, Sato R, Schauble E, Barsh GS, Kobilka BK,
Bernstein D. Cardiovascular indexes in the mouse
at rest and with exercise: new tools to study models of cardiac
disease. Am J Physiol. 1997;272:H1053-H1061.
24. Seibert K, Masferrer J. Role of inducible cyclooxygenase (cox-2) in inflammation. Receptor. 1994;94:17-23.
25.
Salvemini D, Misko TP, Masferrer JL, Seibert MG, Currie
MG, Needleman P. Nitric oxide activates
cyclooxygenase enzymes. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:7240-7244.
26.
Kishimoto C, Kuroki Y, Hiraoka Y, Ochiai H, Kurokawa M,
Sasayama S. Cytokine and murine coxsackievirus B3
myocarditis. Circulation. 1994;89:2836-2842.
27. Woodruff JF. Viral myocarditis: a review. Am J Pathol. 1980;101:427-484.
28.
Karupiah G, Xie QW, Buller RM, Nathan C, Duarte C,
MacMicking JD. Inhibition of viral replication by
interferon-
-induced nitric oxide synthase.
Science. 1993;261:1445-1449.
29. Lepoivre M, Fieschi F, Coves J, Thelander L, Fontecave M. Inactivation of ribonucleotide reductase by nitric oxide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;179:442-448.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Akaike T, Noguchi Y, Ijiri S, Setoguchi K, Suga M,
Zheng YM, Dietzschold B, Maeda H. Pathogenesis of influenza
virus-induced pneumonia: involvement of both nitric oxide and oxygen
radicals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:2448-2453.
31. Kolb H, Kolb BV. Nitric oxide: a pathologic factor in autoimmunity. Immunol Today. 1992;13:157-160.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Hoffman RA, Langrehr JM, Simmons RL. The role of inducible nitric oxide synthase during graft versus host disease. Transplant Proc. 1992;24:2856.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
McCartney-Francis N, Allen JB, Mizel DE.
Suppression of arthritis by an inhibitor of nitric oxide
synthase. J Exp Med. 1993;178:749-754.
34.
Stuehr DJ, Nathan CF. Nitric oxide: a
macrophage product responsible for cytostasis and
respiratory inhibition in tumor target cells. J Exp
Med. 1989;169:1543-1555.
35.
Beckman JS, Beckman TW, Chen J, Marshall PA, Freeman
BA. Apparent hydroxyl radical production by
peroxynitrite: implications for endothelial injury from
nitric oxide and superoxide. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 1990;87:1620-1624.
36. Yang X, Chowdhury N, Cai B, Brett J, Marboe C, Sciacca RR, Michler RE, Cannon PJ. Induction of myocardial nitric oxide synthase by cardiac allograft rejection. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:714-721.
37. Balligand JL, Ungureanu D, Kelly RA, Kobzik L, Pimental D, Michel T, Smith TW. Abnormal contractile function due to induction of nitric oxide synthesis in rat cardiac myocytes follows exposure to activated macrophage-conditioned medium. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:2314-2319.
38. Salvemini D, Manning PT, Zweifel BS, Seibert K, Connor J, Currie MG, Needleman P, Masferrer JL. Dual inhibition of nitric oxide and prostaglandin production contributes to the antiinflammatory properties of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:301-308.
39. Habib FM, Springall DR, Davies GJ, Oakley CM, Yacoub MH, Polak JM. Tumor necrosis factor and inducible nitric oxide synthase in dilated cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 1996;347:1151-1155.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. W. Magnani and G. W. Dec Myocarditis: Current Trends in Diagnosis and Treatment Circulation, February 14, 2006; 113(6): 876 - 890. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Morita, T. Uchiyama, and T. Hori Nitric Oxide Inhibits IFN-{alpha} Production of Human Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells Partly via a Guanosine 3',5'-Cyclic Monophosphate-Dependent Pathway J. Immunol., July 15, 2005; 175(2): 806 - 812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Pauschinger, S. Rutschow, K. Chandrasekharan, D. Westermann, A. Weitz, L. P. Schwimmbeck, H. Zeichhardt, W. Poller, M. Noutsias, J. Li, et al. Carvedilol improves left ventricular function in murine coxsackievirus-induced acute myocarditis Association with reduced myocardial interleukin-1{beta} and MMP-8 expression and a modulated immune response Eur J Heart Fail, June 1, 2005; 7(4): 444 - 452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.-K. Lim, S.-C. Choe, J.-O. Shin, S.-H. Ho, J.-M. Kim, S.-S. Yu, S. Kim, and E.-S. Jeon Local Expression of Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist by Plasmid DNA Improves Mortality and Decreases Myocardial Inflammation in Experimental Coxsackieviral Myocarditis Circulation, March 19, 2002; 105(11): 1278 - 1281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. A. Peotta, E. C. Vasquez, and S. S. Meyrelles Cardiovascular Neural Reflexes in L-NAME-Induced Hypertension in Mice Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 555 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Feldman and D. McNamara Myocarditis N. Engl. J. Med., November 9, 2000; 343(19): 1388 - 1398. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zaragoza, C. J. Ocampo, M. Saura, C. Bao, M. Leppo, A. Lafond-Walker, D. R. Thiemann, R. Hruban, and C. J. Lowenstein Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Protection Against Coxsackievirus Pancreatitis J. Immunol., November 15, 1999; 163(10): 5497 - 5504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ono, A. Matsumori, T. Shioi, Y. Furukawa, and S. Sasayama Contribution of Endothelin-1 to Myocardial Injury in a Murine Model of Myocarditis : Acute Effects of Bosentan, an Endothelin Receptor Antagonist Circulation, October 26, 1999; 100(17): 1823 - 1829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zaragoza, C. Ocampo, M. Saura, M. Leppo, X.-Q. Wei, R. Quick, S. Moncada, F. Y. Liew, and C. J. Lowenstein The role of inducible nitric oxide synthase in the host response to Coxsackievirus myocarditis PNAS, March 3, 1998; 95(5): 2469 - 2474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |