Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1996;79:263-270

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peifley, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Winkles, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peifley, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Winkles, J. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CYCLOHEXIMIDE
*DACTINOMYCIN
*DEXAMETHASONE
*HEPARIN
(Circulation Research. 1996;79:263-270.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Heparin-Binding Epidermal Growth Factor-Like Growth Factor Regulates Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Expression in Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells

Kimberly A. Peifley, Gregory F. Alberts, Debbie K.W. Hsu, Sheau-Line Y. Feng, Jeffrey A. Winkles

the Department of Molecular Biology (K.A.P., G.F.A., D.K.W.H., S.-L.Y.F., J.A.W.), Holland Laboratory, American Red Cross, Rockville, Md, and the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (J.A.W.), George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC.

Correspondence to Dr Jeffrey A. Winkles, Department of Molecular Biology, Holland Laboratory, American Red Cross, 15601 Crabbs Branch Way, Rockville, MD 20855. E-mail winkles@hlsun.red-cross.org.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor–like growth factor (HB-EGF) is a vascular smooth muscle cell (SMC) mitogen and chemotactic factor that is expressed by endothelial cells, SMCs, monocytes/macrophages, and T lymphocytes. Both the membrane-anchored HB-EGF precursor and the secreted mature HB-EGF protein are biologically active; thus, HB-EGF may stimulate SMC growth via autocrine, paracrine, and juxtacrine mechanisms. In the present study, we report that HB-EGF treatment of serum-starved rat aortic SMCs can induce fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-2 (basic FGF) gene expression but not FGF-1 (acidic FGF) gene expression. Increased FGF-2 mRNA expression is first detectable at 1 hour after HB-EGF addition, and maximal FGF-2 mRNA levels, corresponding to an {approx}46-fold level of induction, are present at 4 hours. The effect of HB-EGF on FGF-2 mRNA levels appears to be mediated primarily by a transcriptional mechanism and requires de novo synthesized proteins. HB-EGF induction of FGF-2 mRNA levels can be inhibited by treating cells with the anti-inflammatory glucocorticoid dexamethasone or the glycosaminoglycan heparin. Finally, Western blot analyses indicate that HB-EGF–treated SMCs also produce an increased amount of FGF-2 protein. These results indicate that HB-EGF expressed at sites of vascular injury or inflammation in vivo may upregulate FGF-2 production by SMCs.


Key Words: heparin-binding epidermal growth factor–like growth factor • smooth muscle cell • fibroblast growth factor • dexamethasone • heparin


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor–like growth factor was initially identified as an {approx}22-kD polypeptide mitogen secreted by human macrophages1 and was subsequently purified to homogeneity from U-937 cell–conditioned medium.2 Sequence analysis of human HB-EGF cDNA clones indicated that HB-EGF was (1) a member of the EGF family of structurally related proteins and (2) derived from a membrane-bound precursor.2 This 208-residue precursor molecule consisted of signal peptide, propeptide, mature protein, transmembrane, and cytoplasmic domains.2 3 4 Recent studies have demonstrated that membrane-anchored HB-EGF is the receptor for diphtheria toxin5 6 and can function in a juxtacrine manner to stimulate cell growth.7 Mature secreted HB-EGF, which is generally 75 to 86 amino acids in length, contains an amino-terminal heparin-binding region8 9 and a carboxy-terminal EGF-like region.2 It is a mitogen for various cell types, including murine BALB/c 3T3 cells,1 2 4 rat mesangial cells,10 and human keratinocytes.11 These effects are mediated via binding to and activation of the EGF receptor tyrosine kinase.2 3 12 13 The interaction of HB-EGF with cell surface HSPG is required for optimal binding to the high-affinity EGF receptor.8 9 12 13 14

HB-EGF has several biological properties indicating that it may play a role in the excessive SMC accumulation that occurs during atherogenesis and in response to arterial injury.15 16 17 First, HB-EGF is expressed by endothelial cells,18 19 SMCs,20 21 22 23 monocytes/macrophages,1 2 24 25 and T lymphocytes.26 27 Second, it has been reported that HB-EGF is a mitogen1 2 4 13 23 27 and chemotactic factor4 14 for vascular SMCs. Third, increased levels of both HB-EGF and EGF receptor protein are present in human atherosclerotic plaques compared with nonatherosclerotic arteries.28 In plaques, HB-EGF is expressed primarily by SMCs and monocyte-derived macrophages, whereas EGF receptor expression is restricted to SMCs. Fourth, HB-EGF transcripts are expressed in rat arteries,23 and after balloon injury, there is an increase in the number of EGF (and thus also HB-EGF) binding sites on the neointimal SMC surface.29 Furthermore, local or systemic delivery of an EGF receptor–targeted cytotoxin after balloon injury inhibits SMC proliferation and neointimal thickening.29 Taken together, these results indicate that HB-EGF, acting via autocrine, paracrine, and/or juxtacrine mechanisms, may be an important mediator of SMC proliferation and migration in vivo.

In consideration of the potential role of HB-EGF in vascular SMC growth control, we investigated whether HB-EGF could regulate FGF-1 (acidic FGF) or FGF-2 (basic FGF) expression. FGF-1 and FGF-2, two members of the FGF family of structurally related heparin-binding proteins,30 31 are angiogenic factors32 33 34 and potent mitogens for many cell types, including vascular SMCs.32 33 35 36 37 There is evidence that these two proteins may be involved in atherogenesis38 39 40 as well as postangioplasty restenosis.41 42 Since the overexpression of FGF-1 or FGF-2 in transfected cell lines can result in autocrine growth stimulation,43 44 45 46 cellular production of these proteins in vivo must be tightly controlled. Previous studies have shown that several different vasoactive hormones,47 48 49 50 cytokines,51 and polypeptide growth factors52 53 54 55 56 can elevate FGF-1 and/or FGF-2 production by SMCs. In the present study, we demonstrate that HB-EGF–treated rat aortic SMCs express increased levels of FGF-2 mRNA and protein. In addition, HB-EGF induction of FGF-2 mRNA expression can be inhibited by treating cells with dexamethasone or heparin. These results, in combination with previous studies demonstrating HB-EGF autoinduction,22 FGF-2 autoinduction,55 and FGF-2 induction of HB-EGF expression22 in vascular SMCs, indicate that both autoregulatory and cross-regulatory mechanisms may control HB-EGF and FGF-2 levels within the vessel wall.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cell Culture
Adult rat (Wistar-Kyoto) thoracic aorta SMCs were kindly provided by M. Majesky, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex. The cells were cultured at 37°C in a 1:1 mixture of DMEM and Ham's F-12 medium (Mediatech) supplemented with 5% FBS (Hyclone Laboratories, Inc), 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and 0.25 µg/mL amphotericin B (JRH Biosciences). Rat SMC cultures were fed every 48 hours and expanded by trypsin-EDTA (JRH Biosciences) treatment and subculturing at a 1:5 split ratio. Cells were incubated for {approx}72 hours in normal growth medium without FBS but containing 5 µg/mL insulin, 5 µg/mL transferrin, and 5 ng/mL selenious acid (ITS, Collaborative Biomedical Products) to obtain a relatively quiescent SMC population.

RNA Isolation and Northern Blot Hybridization
Serum-starved SMCs were treated with the following agents either added alone or in various combinations: actinomycin D (2 µg/mL, Sigma Chemical Co), cycloheximide (10 µg/mL, Sigma), recombinant human HB-EGF (residues 63 to 148 of the HB-EGF precursor4 purified from baculovirus-infected insect cell–conditioned medium, 10 ng/mL unless otherwise noted; either obtained commercially [R&D Systems] or from M. Klagsbrun, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass), recombinant human EGF (10 ng/mL, Upstate Biotechnology), dexamethasone (1, 10, or 100 nmol/L, Sigma), and heparin (10, 30, or 100 µg/mL, Upjohn). In the heparin treatment experiments, either HB-EGF or EGF was preincubated with heparin for 5 minutes and then added to cells. Cells were harvested, and total RNA was isolated using RNA-Stat 60 (Tel-Test "B" Inc) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Each sample (10 µg) was denatured, loaded onto 1.2% agarose gels containing 2.2 mol/L formaldehyde, and subjected to electrophoresis. The gels were stained with 0.3 µg/mL ethidium bromide (Sigma) to confirm that the RNA samples were undegraded and that similar amounts were present in each lane. RNA was transferred onto Zetabind nylon membranes (Cuno Inc) by electrophoresis in 0.3x TEA (12 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 0.5 mmol/L EDTA, 6 mmol/L CH3COONa, and 8.88 mmol/L CH3COOH) and then cross-linked to the membrane by UV irradiation. The blots were prehybridized at 65°C for at least 2 hours in 1% BSA, 7% SDS, 0.5 mol/L NaH2PO4 (pH 7.0), 1 mmol/L EDTA, 100 µg/mL denatured salmon sperm DNA (Sigma), and 20% (vol/vol) formamide (Fluka Chemicals). The prehybridization solution was then discarded, and the blots were placed in the same solution as described above, except a 32P-labeled cDNA probe was included. The cDNA probes used were (1) rat FGF-1, 517-bp EcoRI fragment of pRSV-Neo-HBGF-1 (kind gift of W. McKeehan, Albert B. Alkek Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University, Houston), (2) rat FGF-2, 477-bp Xho I–Nco I fragment of RObFGF.477 (kind gift of A. Baird, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, Calif), and (3) human GAPDH, 800-bp Pst I–Xba I fragment of pHcGAP (American Type Culture Collection). The DNA fragments were labeled to high specific activity with [32P]dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol, DuPont/NEN) using a random primer labeling kit (Boehringer Mannheim). The blots were hybridized for {approx}18 hours at 65°C in a shaking water bath and then washed sequentially with wash buffer A (0.5% BSA, 5% SDS, 40 mmol/L NaH2PO4 [pH 7.0], and 1 mmol/L EDTA), wash buffer B (1% SDS, 40 mmol/L NaH2PO4 [pH 7.0], and 1 mmol/L EDTA), and 0.1x SSPE (18 mmol/L NaCl, 0.1 mmol/L EDTA, and 1 mmol/L NaH2PO4 [pH 7.0]). The blots were then air-dried and exposed to Kodak X-Omat AR x-ray film. Autoradiographic signals or photographic images were analyzed by densitometry using the BioImage whole band analyzer (Millipore). FGF-2 mRNA signal intensities were calculated after normalization to either GAPDH mRNA or 18S rRNA levels. FGF-2 mRNA half-lives in the absence or presence of HB-EGF were calculated as described previously.57 All of the best-fit lines had correlation coefficients (R2) of >.929; thus, the data obtained were consistent with a first-order decay model.

Western Blot Analysis
Serum-starved SMCs were either left untreated or treated with HB-EGF (10 ng/mL) for 12 hours. The conditioned medium was then collected and frozen at -70°C. Cells were washed twice with PBS (Mediatech) and then with 2 mol/L NaCl in PBS. The NaCl wash fraction was then collected, diluted with H2O to 0.5 mol/L NaCl, and frozen at -70°C. Cells were lysed in HNTG buffer (20 mmol/L HEPES [pH 7.4], 150 mmol/L NaCl, 10% [vol/vol] glycerol, 1% [vol/vol] Triton X-100, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 1 mmol/L EGTA, 0.01 mg/mL aprotinin, and 1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). HNTG lysates were incubated on ice for 10 minutes and then spun at 10 000g for 10 minutes to remove insoluble material and nuclei. The amount of protein in each clarified lysate was determined using the BCA assay (Pierce Chemical Co). Each lysate (100 µg) and appropriate volumes (normalized according to cell protein amounts) of the conditioned medium and the 2 mol/L NaCl wash samples were diluted with 1/10 volume of 10x binding buffer (0.5 mol/L Tris-HCl [pH 7.5] and 100 mmol/L EDTA). As a control, a duplicate sample of conditioned medium from untreated SMCs was mixed with 100 ng of recombinant human FGF-2 protein (18-kD isoform, Bachem) and treated identically to the other samples. Heparin-Sepharose CL-6B (Pharmacia) was added, and the mixture was incubated (rocking) at 4°C for {approx}18 hours. The resin and bound proteins were pelleted, washed three times with 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.5 mol/L NaCl, and 10 mmol/L EDTA, and combined with an equivalent volume of sample buffer (125 mmol/L Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 4% SDS, 20% [vol/vol] glycerol, and 10% [vol/vol] 2-mercaptoethanol). The samples were denatured at 95°C for 4 minutes and subjected to electrophoresis on a 15% polyacrylamide-SDS slab gel. Recombinant human FGF-1 (2 ng, kind gift of W. Burgess, American Red Cross, Rockville, Md), recombinant human FGF-2 (2 ng, Bachem), and low-molecular-weight markers (Bio-Rad) were also loaded onto the gel. Proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher and Schuell, Inc) by electrophoresis in 25 mmol/L Tris, 192 mmol/L glycine, 0.02% SDS, and 20% (vol/vol) methanol. The membrane was stained with Ponceau S (Sigma) to verify that each lane contained equivalent amounts of protein, blocked with TBST (50 mmol/L Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 150 mmol/L NaCl, and 0.5% [vol/vol] Tween 20) containing 5% nonfat dry milk and incubated at 4°C for {approx}18 hours in TBST containing a 1:250 dilution of an anti–FGF-2 monoclonal antibody (Transduction Labs). The membrane was then washed with TBST and incubated with a horseradish peroxidase–conjugated anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (1:20 000 dilution, Bio-Rad). Bound secondary antibody was visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham). Film exposure and densitometry were performed as described above for Northern blots.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Rat aortic SMCs are particularly well suited for studies examining HB-EGF regulation of gene expression since they (1) are relatively easy to culture, (2) express cell surface EGF receptors,13 58 59 60 61 and (3) proliferate in response to HB-EGF13 or EGF13 58 60 62 stimulation. Therefore, these cells were used in all of the experiments described in this report. We first determined whether HB-EGF treatment of serum-starved rat aortic SMCs altered FGF-1 or FGF-2 mRNA levels. Cells were either left untreated or treated with HB-EGF for 4 hours, RNA was isolated, and Northern blot hybridization analysis was performed. FGF-1 and FGF-2 transcripts of {approx}4.4 kb and {approx}6.0 kb in size, respectively, were coexpressed in rat SMCs (Fig 1Down). HB-EGF treatment had no detectable effect on FGF-1 mRNA levels but significantly increased FGF-2 mRNA levels.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effect of HB-EGF treatment on FGF-1 and FGF-2 mRNA levels in SMCs. A, Serum-starved SMCs were either left untreated (NT) or treated with HB-EGF for 4 hours. RNA was isolated, and equivalent amounts of each sample were analyzed by Northern blot hybridization using FGF-1 (top) or GAPDH (bottom) cDNA probes. The upper and lower bars on the left side of the blot indicate the positions of 28S and 18S rRNA, respectively. Only the region of the autoradiogram that contained GAPDH mRNA hybridization is shown. B, The same two RNA samples were also analyzed by Northern blot hybridization using FGF-2 (top) or GAPDH (bottom) cDNA probes. The upper and lower bars on the left side of the blot indicate the positions of 28S and 18S rRNA, respectively. Only the region of the autoradiogram that contained GAPDH mRNA hybridization is shown.

The kinetics of HB-EGF–induced FGF-2 mRNA expression were then investigated by Northern blot analysis using RNA isolated from SMCs treated with HB-EGF for different periods of time. HB-EGF induced FGF-2 mRNA levels in a time-dependent manner (Fig 2ADown). Reprobing of this Northern blot with an FGF-1 cDNA clone demonstrated no increase in FGF-1 mRNA levels (data not shown). Increased FGF-2 mRNA expression was first detected at 1 hour after HB-EGF addition; as estimated by densitometry, FGF-2 mRNA levels were elevated 3.4-fold. The maximal level of FGF-2 mRNA was apparent after 4 hours of stimulation, representing a 45.6-fold induction. FGF-2 mRNA levels were still elevated at 12 hours (14.7-fold induction), the latest time point examined.



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effect of HB-EGF treatment on FGF-2 mRNA levels in SMCs: time-course and dose-response analyses. A, Serum-starved SMCs were either left untreated or treated with HB-EGF for the indicated times. RNA was isolated, and equivalent amounts of each sample were analyzed by Northern blot hybridization using an FGF-2 cDNA probe (top). The upper and lower bars on the left side of the blot indicate the positions of 28S and 18S rRNA, respectively. In this experiment, we noted an increase in GAPDH mRNA levels at the later time points; therefore, a photograph of the 18S rRNA species visualized by ethidium bromide fluorescence is shown in the bottom panel to demonstrate that similar amounts of RNA were loaded in each gel lane. B, Serum-starved SMCs were either left untreated (NT) or treated for 4 hours with the indicated HB-EGF concentration. RNA was isolated, and equivalent amounts of each sample were analyzed by Northern blot hybridization using FGF-2 (top) or GAPDH (bottom) cDNA probes. The upper and lower bars on the left side of the blot indicate the positions of 28S and 18S rRNA, respectively. Only the region of the autoradiogram that contained GAPDH mRNA hybridization is shown.

We also determined whether HB-EGF caused a concentration-dependent increase in FGF-2 mRNA levels. Serum-starved SMCs were either left untreated or treated for 4 hours with increasing concentrations of HB-EGF, RNA was isolated, and Northern blot analysis was performed. HB-EGF increased FGF-2 mRNA levels in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 2BUp); in contrast, reprobing of this blot with an FGF-1 cDNA clone revealed that FGF-1 mRNA levels were unaffected (data not shown). Elevated FGF-2 mRNA expression was first apparent when cells were stimulated with 3 ng/mL HB-EGF, and maximal induction occurred at an HB-EGF concentration of 10 ng/mL.

We next investigated whether de novo RNA and protein synthesis were required for HB-EGF induction of FGF-2 mRNA levels. SMCs were either left untreated or treated for 4 hours with HB-EGF in the absence or presence of either actinomycin D, an RNA synthesis inhibitor, or cycloheximide, a protein synthesis inhibitor. SMCs were also treated with each of the inhibitors alone. Cells were collected, RNA was isolated, and Northern blot hybridization analysis was performed. Actinomycin D treatment prevented HB-EGF induction of FGF-2 mRNA levels (Fig 3Down); thus, the increase in FGF-2 mRNA expression after HB-EGF addition is likely to be due to transcriptional activation of the FGF-2 gene. Actinomycin D also decreased the basal level of FGF-2 mRNA expression in nonstimulated cells, indicating that FGF-2 transcripts have a relatively short half-life (see below). Cycloheximide treatment partially inhibited the ability of HB-EGF to elevate FGF-2 mRNA expression; thus, the synthesis of intermediary proteins is required for maximal induction of FGF-2 mRNA expression.



View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of actinomycin D or cycloheximide on HB-EGF–induced FGF-2 mRNA expression in SMCs. Serum-starved SMCs were either left untreated (NT) or treated for 4 hours with HB-EGF alone, HB-EGF and actinomycin D (HB-EGF+Act.D), actinomycin D alone (Act.D), HB-EGF and cycloheximide (HB-EGF+Chx), or cycloheximide alone (Chx). RNA was isolated, and equivalent amounts of each sample were analyzed by Northern blot hybridization using FGF-2 or GAPDH cDNA probes. The upper and lower bars on the left side of the blot indicate the positions of 28S and 18S rRNA, respectively. Only the region of the autoradiogram that contained GAPDH mRNA hybridization is shown.

FGF-2 mRNA stability measurements provided additional evidence in support of a transcriptional control mechanism for HB-EGF induction of FGF-2 mRNA levels. Serum-starved SMCs were either left untreated or treated for different periods of time with actinomycin D in either the absence or presence of HB-EGF. RNA was isolated, and FGF-2 mRNA levels were assayed by Northern blot hybridization (Fig 4Down). Autoradiographic signals were quantified using scanning laser densitometry and FGF-2 mRNA levels normalized to GAPDH mRNA levels. The natural logarithm of percent RNA remaining was plotted against time after actinomycin D addition, and half-lives were calculated by linear regression analysis. FGF-2 mRNA decayed with first-order kinetics and had a slightly longer half-life in HB-EGF–treated SMCs (2.9 hours) than in serum-starved SMCs (2.4 hours). This minor difference is unlikely to account for the large and rapid increase in FGF-2 mRNA levels observed after HB-EGF treatment.



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of HB-EGF treatment on FGF-2 mRNA stability in SMCs. Serum-starved SMCs were either left untreated or treated with actinomycin D (Act.D) alone or HB-EGF and actinomycin D (HB-EGF+Act.D). RNA was isolated, and equivalent amounts of each sample were analyzed by Northern blot hybridization using FGF-2 or GAPDH cDNA probes. The upper and lower bars on the left side of the blot indicate the positions of 28S and 18S rRNA, respectively. Only the region of the autoradiogram that contained GAPDH mRNA hybridization is shown.

The effect of glucocorticoid treatment on HB-EGF regulation of FGF-2 mRNA expression was then examined. Glucocorticoids are potent anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive agents.63 Dexamethasone, a synthetic glucocorticoid, can inhibit SMC proliferation in vitro64 65 and suppress neointimal formation after balloon angioplasty of rabbit66 67 or rat68 arteries. In a previous study, we demonstrated that dexamethasone inhibits interleukin-1–induced FGF-2 mRNA expression in human SMCs.51 To test whether dexamethasone could inhibit HB-EGF–induced FGF-2 mRNA expression in rat SMCs, serum-starved cells were either left untreated or treated with HB-EGF for 4 hours in either the absence or presence of 1, 10, or 100 nmol/L dexamethasone. Cells were collected, RNA was isolated, and Northern blot hybridization was performed. Dexamethasone inhibited HB-EGF induction of FGF-2 mRNA levels in a dose-dependent manner (Fig 5Down); as estimated by densitometry, 1 nmol/L dexamethasone inhibited induction by 38%, whereas concentrations of either 10 or 100 nmol/L had a similar potency, inhibiting induction by 70% and 66%, respectively. The addition of dexamethasone alone to serum-starved nonstimulated SMCs did not alter the basal level of FGF-2 mRNA expression (data not shown).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Effect of dexamethasone on HB-EGF–induced FGF-2 mRNA expression in SMCs. Serum-starved SMCs were either left untreated (NT) or treated for 4 hours with either HB-EGF alone or HB-EGF in combination with 1, 10, or 100 nmol/L dexamethasone (Dex/1, Dex/10, and Dex/100, respectively). RNA was isolated, and equivalent amounts of each sample were analyzed by Northern blot hybridization using FGF-2 or GAPDH cDNA probes. In this and the subsequent Northern blot figure, only the regions of the autoradiogram that contained FGF-2 mRNA or GAPDH mRNA hybridization are shown.

We also investigated whether the glycosaminoglycan heparin could inhibit HB-EGF–induced FGF-2 mRNA expression. As mentioned previously, HB-EGF can bind to both immobilized heparin1 2 3 and to cell surface HSPG.9 14 Recent studies have indicated that the interaction with cell surface HSPG is essential for optimal binding to high-affinity EGF receptors.8 9 12 13 14 For example, treatment of bovine SMCs with either heparitinase (which degrades heparan sulfate chains), chlorate (which inhibits sulfation of glycosaminoglycans), or a synthetic peptide corresponding to the heparin-binding domain of HB-EGF inhibits HB-EGF binding to the EGF receptor as well as HB-EGF–stimulated cell migration.14 In consideration of these findings, we tested whether exogenously added heparin could inhibit HB-EGF induction of FGF-2 mRNA expression. Serum-starved SMCs were either left untreated or treated for 4 hours with HB-EGF in either the absence or presence of 10, 30, or 100 µg/mL heparin. As a control, we also examined the effect of heparin on EGF-induced FGF-2 mRNA expression. EGF does not bind heparin-affinity columns69 or cell surface HSPG12 14 ; thus, EGF-mediated EGF receptor activation should be heparin independent. After the various treatments, the SMCs were collected, RNA was isolated, and Northern blot hybridization was performed. Heparin inhibited HB-EGF–induced but not EGF-induced FGF-2 mRNA expression (Fig 6Down). The extent of inhibition varied in a dose-dependent manner; as estimated by densitometry, 10 µg/mL heparin inhibited induction by 47%, and either 30 or 100 µg/mL heparin had a similar effect, inhibiting induction by 66% and 62%, respectively. Heparin treatment alone did not alter the basal level of FGF-2 mRNA expression in serum-starved SMCs (data not shown).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Effect of heparin on HB-EGF–induced or EGF-induced FGF-2 mRNA expression in SMCs. Serum-starved SMCs were either left untreated (NT) or treated for 4 hours with HB-EGF or EGF alone or in combination with 10, 30, or 100 µg/mL heparin (Hep/10, Hep/30, and Hep/100, respectively). RNA was isolated, and equivalent amounts of each sample were analyzed by Northern blot hybridization using FGF-2 or GAPDH cDNA probes.

Finally, Western blot analysis was performed to determine whether HB-EGF stimulation of rat SMCs resulted in elevated FGF-2 production. Serum-starved cells were either left untreated or treated with HB-EGF for 12 hours. Although FGF-2 lacks a conventional signal peptide sequence required for secretion via the endoplasmic reticulum/Golgi pathway, it can be released from at least some cell types by an alternative mechanism.70 71 Accordingly, FGF-2 has been found in conditioned medium46 71 and in association with the extracellular matrix.72 73 74 Therefore, we examined FGF-2 protein levels in conditioned medium (to assay soluble secreted FGF-2), 2 mol/L NaCl washes of the cell monolayers (to assay cell surface/extracellular matrix–associated FGF-272 ), and HNTG lysates (to assay cytoplasmic FGF-2). Heparin-Sepharose bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with an anti–FGF-2 monoclonal antibody. This antibody does not recognize FGF-1, the FGF family member with the greatest sequence identity to FGF-2 (Fig 7ADown). Three immunoreactive proteins with approximate molecular masses consistent with the predicted rat FGF-2 isoforms (18, 21.5, and 22 kD)75 were detected in the SMC lysates (Fig 7BDown). The expression level of all three species increased after HB-EGF treatment; as estimated by densitometry, FGF-2 protein levels were elevated 1.9-fold at 12 hours after stimulation. We were unable to detect FGF-2 in either the 2 mol/L NaCl wash fractions or the conditioned medium samples. This is not likely to reflect ineffective binding of FGF-2 to the heparin-Sepharose resin, since FGF-2 that had been added to conditioned medium was readily recovered under our experimental conditions (Fig 7CDown).



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Expression of FGF-2 protein in HB-EGF–treated SMCs. A, Equivalent amounts of recombinant FGF-1 or FGF-2 (18-kD isoform) were subjected to SDS-PAGE, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and incubated with an anti–FGF-2 antibody. Immunoreactive protein was visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence system. The positions of protein size standards (molecular masses in kD) are indicated on the left. B, Serum-starved SMCs were either left untreated (0') or treated with HB-EGF for 12 hours. Cell lysates were prepared, and equivalent amounts of protein were subjected to heparin-Sepharose affinity chromatography and Western blot analysis as described above. Also, equivalent amounts of 2 mol/L NaCl wash fractions and conditioned medium samples were processed similarly. C, Conditioned medium from untreated SMC cultures was mixed with recombinant FGF-2 (18-kD isoform) and then processed as described above.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The results of the present study demonstrate that the polypeptide mitogen HB-EGF can induce FGF-2 mRNA levels in rat aortic SMCs in a time- and dose-dependent manner. The increase in FGF-2 mRNA abundance noted after HB-EGF treatment (1) does not occur if transcription is inhibited, (2) does not reflect FGF-2 mRNA stabilization, (3) requires de novo protein synthesis, and (4) results in an approximately twofold elevation of FGF-2 protein expression. Furthermore, both dexamethasone (an anti-inflammatory glucocorticoid) and heparin (a glycosaminoglycan) can suppress HB-EGF induction of FGF-2 mRNA expression.

There have been relatively few previous reports describing the ability of HB-EGF to regulate the expression of specific gene products. In the one study using vascular cells, Dluz et al22 found that HB-EGF–stimulated fetal human SMCs expressed elevated levels of HB-EGF mRNA. HB-EGF autoinduction has also been noted in human pancreatic cancer cells,76 human keratinocytes,11 and rat intestinal epithelial cells.77 In the latter cell type, HB-EGF can also increase the expression of several genes encoding other members of the EGF family, including transforming growth factor-{alpha}, amphiregulin, and betacellulin.77 Indeed, many members of the EGF family of structurally related mitogens are capable of autoinduction and cross induction.11 76 77

HB-EGF does not induce FGF-2 mRNA levels to the maximal extent if RNA synthesis is inhibited using the drug actinomycin D. This suggests that HB-EGF treatment is causing an increase in FGF-2 gene transcription. This mechanism of action is also supported by the FGF-2 mRNA decay measurements, indicating that HB-EGF does not significantly alter FGF-2 mRNA stability. However, it is also possible that actinomycin D is preventing the synthesis of an HB-EGF–inducible protein that stabilizes FGF-2 mRNA. However, this seems unlikely in consideration of the rapid kinetics of FGF-2 mRNA accumulation following HB-EGF addition.

HB-EGF also cannot induce maximal levels of FGF-2 mRNA if added in combination with the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide. Similar results were obtained in our previous experiments investigating the molecular basis for serum,52 interleukin-1,51 or FGF-255 regulation of FGF-2 mRNA expression in vascular SMCs. We have recently found that angiotensin II induction of FGF-2 mRNA expression in rat SMCs also requires de novo protein synthesis (authors' unpublished data, 1996). Taken together, these studies indicate that FGF-2 is a delayed early-response gene regulated by serum factors, cytokines, polypeptide mitogens, and vasoactive hormones.

We found that the potent anti-inflammatory glucocorticoid dexamethasone could suppress HB-EGF–induced FGF-2 mRNA expression. It is presently unknown whether this effect is due to a decrease in the rate of FGF-2 gene transcription and/or to increased FGF-2 mRNA turnover. We reported previously that this compound could also inhibit interleukin-1–induced FGF-2 gene expression in human saphenous vein SMCs.51 Additionally, Nakano et al21 demonstrated that similar concentrations of dexamethasone could decrease both constitutive and thrombin-induced PDGF A-chain and HB-EGF gene expression in fetal human SMCs. Dexamethasone inhibits SMC growth in vitro64 65 and can decrease neointima formation following balloon catheter–induced arterial injury.66 67 68 These biological effects may reflect, at least in part, the ability of dexamethasone to decrease autocrine growth factor production by SMCs.

Several studies have demonstrated that HB-EGF, but not EGF, requires a low-affinity interaction with cell surface HSPG for efficient binding to and activation of the EGF receptor tyrosine kinase.8 9 12 13 14 Additional evidence in support of a "dual receptor system" was obtained in our experiments, which revealed that exogenous heparin can suppress HB-EGF–induced FGF-2 mRNA expression. This heparin effect cannot be attributed to a general inhibition of SMC gene activity since (1) EGF-induced FGF-2 mRNA expression was not effected by heparin, (2) heparin treatment of unstimulated SMCs did not alter the basal level of FGF-2 mRNA expression, and (3) GAPDH mRNA levels were not decreased by heparin treatment. Heparin did not completely inhibit HB-EGF activity, which is consistent with a report by Besner et al8 indicating that similar concentrations of heparin could only partially block HB-EGF binding to EGF receptors on human endometrial carcinoma cells. Thus, it appears that HB-EGF can also bind EGF receptors in a HSPG-independent manner.

We were able to detect an HB-EGF–mediated increase in the cytoplasmic levels of FGF-2 by Western blot analysis. However, we could not detect FGF-2 in the extracellular matrix or in the conditioned medium before or after HB-EGF treatment. The increase in intracellular FGF-2 levels was significantly less than one would predict from the mRNA expression data. These findings are very similar to those reported in our previous study analyzing FGF-2 induction of FGF-2 mRNA and protein expression in rat SMCs.55 The relatively low level of FGF-2 protein induction noted in these experiments indicates that FGF-2 synthesis in rat SMCs may be regulated at the translational level. This possibility is supported by recent studies examining FGF-2 mRNA translational efficiency in vitro and in vivo.78 79

In summary, we have demonstrated that HB-EGF treatment of rat aortic SMCs induces FGF-2 gene expression. We reported previously that FGF-1 and FGF-2 could also regulate FGF-2 expression in this same cell type.55 Dluz et al22 found that HB-EGF– or FGF-2–stimulated fetal human SMCs expressed elevated levels of HB-EGF mRNA. Taken together, these results indicate that both autoregulatory and cross-regulatory mechanisms may control HB-EGF and FGF-2 production by SMCs in vivo. It should be emphasized that the abundance of HB-EGF or FGF-2 within the vessel wall is likely to reflect the relative expression and activity of both positive and negative regulatory factors. For example, although HB-EGF expression is elevated in human atherosclerotic plaques,28 FGF-2 expression is not.39

The biological significance of our findings in the context of vascular SMC growth regulation in vivo is presently unknown. HB-EGF and FGF-2 released by SMCs themselves could independently stimulate SMC proliferation via both autocrine and paracrine mechanisms. In developing atherosclerotic lesions, HB-EGF and FGF-2 derived from macrophages28 38 39 and/or T lymphocytes27 could act on neighboring SMCs via a paracrine mechanism or, in the case of membrane-anchored HB-EGF, via a juxtacrine mechanism. Elevated levels of FGF-2 within the vessel wall may not only promote SMC accumulation but could also stimulate reendothelialization and the growth of microvessels. We conclude that interactions between individual members of the EGF or FGF families of structurally related mitogens could play a role in the pathogenesis of vascular disease.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
EGF = epidermal growth factor
FGF = fibroblast growth factor
HB-EGF = heparin-binding epidermal growth factor–like growth factor
HSPG = heparan sulfate proteoglycans
SMC = smooth muscle cell


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported in part by National Institutes of Health research grant HL-39727 (Dr Winkles). Portions of this work were performed by K.A. Peifley in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master's degree in Biomedical Sciences at Hood College, Frederick, Md. Dr Hsu was supported in part by a training grant from the National Institutes of Health (HL-07698). We thank the five investigators mentioned in "Materials and Methods" for generously providing reagents. We are also grateful to K. Wawzinski for excellent secretarial assistance.

Received September 6, 1995; accepted May 6, 1996.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Besner G, Higashiyama S, Klagsbrun M. Isolation and characterization of a macrophage-derived heparin-binding growth factor. Cell Regul. 1990;1:811-819.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Higashiyama S, Abraham JA, Miller J, Fiddes JC, Klagsbrun M. A heparin-binding growth factor secreted by macrophage-like cells that is related to EGF. Science. 1991;251:936-939.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Higashiyama S, Lau K, Besner GE, Abraham JA, Klagsbrun M. Structure of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor: multiple forms, primary structure, and glycosylation of the mature protein. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:6205-6212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Ono M, Raab G, Lau K, Abraham JA, Klagsbrun M. Purification and characterization of transmembrane forms of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:31315-31321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Naglich JG, Metherall JE, Russell DW, Eidels L. Expression cloning of a diphtheria toxin receptor: identity with a heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor precursor. Cell. 1992;69:1051-1061.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Mitamura T, Higashiyama S, Taniguchi N, Klagsbrun M, Mekada E. Diphtheria toxin binds to the epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like domain of human heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor/diphtheria toxin receptor and inhibits specifically its mitogenic activity. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:1015-1019.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Higashiyama S, Iwamoto R, Goishi K, Raab G, Taniguchi N, Klagsbrun M, Mekada E. The membrane protein CD9/DRAP 27 potentiates the juxtacrine growth factor activity of the membrane-anchored heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor. J Cell Biol. 1995;128:929-938.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Besner GE, Whelton D, Crissman-Combs MA, Steffen CL, Kim GY, Brigstock DR. Interaction of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF) with the epidermal growth factor receptor: modulation by heparin, heparinase, or synthetic heparin-binding HB-EGF fragments. Growth Factors. 1992;7:289-296.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Thompson SA, Higashiyama S, Wood K, Pollitt NS, Damm D, McEnroe G, Garrick B, Ashton N, Lau K, Hancock N, Klagsbrun M, Abraham JA. Characterization of sequences within heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor that mediate interaction with heparin. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:2541-2549.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Tan M, Tsai J, Lee Y, Chen H, Shin S, Lai Y, Perrella MA, Bianchi C, Higashiyama S, Endege W, Lee M, Tsai J. Induction of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor mRNA by protein kinase C activators. Kidney Int. 1994;46:690-695.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Hashimoto K, Higashiyama S, Asada H, Hashimura E, Kobayashi T, Sudo K, Nakagawa T, Damm D, Yoshikawa K, Taniguchi N. Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor is an autocrine growth factor for human keratinocytes. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:20060-20066.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Aviezer D, Yayon A. Heparin-dependent binding and autophosphorylation of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor by heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor but not by EGF. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:12173-12177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Fukuda K, Inui Y, Kawata S, Higashiyama S, Matsuda Y, Maeda Y, Igura T, Yoshida S, Taniguchi N, Matsuzawa Y. Increased mitogenic response to heparin-binding epidermal growth factor–like growth factor in vascular smooth muscle cells of diabetic rats. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1995;15:1680-1687.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Higashiyama S, Abraham JA, Klagsbrun M. Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor stimulation of smooth muscle cell migration: dependence on interactions with cell surface heparan sulfate. J Cell Biol. 1993;122:933-940.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature. 1993;362:801-809.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Nikkari ST, Clowes AW. Restenosis after vascular reconstruction. Ann Med. 1994;26:95-100.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Schwartz SM, deBlois D, O'Brien ERM. The intima: soil for atherosclerosis and restenosis. Circ Res. 1995;77:445-465.[Free Full Text]

18. Yoshizumi M, Kourembanas S, Temizer DH, Cambria RP, Quertermous T, Lee ME. Tumor necrosis factor increases transcription of the heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor gene in vascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:9467-9469.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Morita T, Yoshizumi M, Kurihara H, Maemura K, Nagai R, Yazaki Y. Shear stress increases heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor mRNA levels in human vascular endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;197:256-262.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Temizer DH, Yoshizumi M, Perrella MA, Susanni EE, Quertermous T, Lee ME. Induction of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor messenger RNA by phorbol ester and angiotensin II in rat aortic smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:24892-24896.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Nakano T, Raines EW, Abraham JA, Wenzel FG, IV, Higashiyama S, Klagsbrun M, Ross R. Glucocorticoid inhibits thrombin-induced expression of platelet-derived growth factor A-chain and heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor in human aortic smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:22941-22947.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Dluz SM, Higashiyama S, Damm D, Abraham JA, Klagsbrun M. Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor expression in cultured fetal human vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:18330-18334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Higashiyama S, Abraham JA, Klagsbrun M. Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor synthesis by smooth muscle cells. Horm Res. 1994;42:9-13.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Nakano T, Raines EW, Abraham JA, Klagsbrun M, Ross R. Lysophosphatidylcholine upregulates the level of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor mRNA in human monocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:1069-1073.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Pan Z, Kravchenko VV, Ye RD. Platelet-activating factor stimulates transcription of the heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor in monocytes. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:7787-7790.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Blotnick S, Peoples GE, Freeman MR, Eberlein TJ, Klagsbrun M. T lymphocytes synthesize and export heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor, mitogens for vascular cells and fibroblasts: differential production and release by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:2890-2894.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Peoples GE, Blotnick S, Takahashi K, Freeman MR, Klagsbrun M, Eberlein TJ. T lymphocytes that infiltrate tumors and atherosclerotic plaques produce heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor: a potential pathologic role. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:6547-6551.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Miyagawa J, Higashiyama S, Kawata S, Inui Y, Tamura S, Yamamoto K, Nishida M, Nakamura T, Yamashita S, Matsuzawa Y, Taniguchi N. Localization of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor in the smooth muscle cells and macrophages of human atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:404-411.

29. Pastore CJ, Isner JM, Bacha PA, Kearney M, Pickering JG. Epidermal growth factor receptor–targeted cytotoxin inhibits neointimal hyperplasia in vivo: results of local versus systemic administration. Circ Res. 1995;77:519-529.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Burgess WH, Winkles JA. The fibroblast growth factor family: multifunctional regulators of cell proliferation. In: Pusztai L, Lewis CE, Yap E, eds. Cell Proliferation in Cancer: Regulatory Mechanisms of Neoplastic Cell Growth. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1996:154-217.

31. Fernig DG, Gallagher JT. Fibroblast growth factors and their receptors: an information network controlling tissue growth, morphogenesis and repair. Prog Growth Factor Res. 1994;5:353-377.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Cuevas P, Gonzalez AM, Carceller F, Baird A. Vascular response to basic fibroblast growth factor when infused onto the normal adventitia or into the injured media of the rat carotid artery. Circ Res. 1991;69:360-369.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Edelman ER, Nugent MA, Smith LT, Karnovsky MJ. Basic fibroblast growth factor enhances the coupling of intimal hyperplasia and proliferation of vasa vasorum in injured rat arteries. J Clin Invest. 1992;89:465-473.

34. Folkman J, Shing Y. Angiogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:10931-10934.[Free Full Text]

35. Parish MA, Grossi EA, Baumann FG, Asai T, Rifkin DB, Dolvin SB, Galloway AC. Effects of a single administration of fibroblast growth factor on vascular wall reaction to injury. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:948-954.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Lindner V, Lappi DA, Baird A, Majack RA, Reidy MA. Role of basic fibroblast growth factor in vascular lesion formation. Circ Res. 1991;68:106-113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. D'Amore PA, Smith SR. Growth factor effects on cells of the vascular wall: a survey. Growth Factors. 1993;8:61-75.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Hughes SE, Crossman D, Hall PA. Expression of basic and acidic fibroblast growth factors and their receptor in normal and atherosclerotic human arteries. Cardiovasc Res. 1993;27:1214-1219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Brogi E, Winkles JA, Underwood R, Clinton SK, Alberts GF, Libby P. Distinct patterns of expression of fibroblast growth factors and their receptors in human atheroma and non-atherosclerotic arteries: association of acidic FGF with plaque microvessels and macrophages. J Clin Invest. 1993;92:2408-2418.

40. Flugelman MY, Virmani R, Correa R, Yu Z, Farb A, Leon MB, Elami A, Fu Y, Casscells W, Epstein SE. Smooth muscle cell abundance and fibroblast growth factors in coronary lesions of patients with nonfatal unstable angina. Circulation. 1993;88:2493-2500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Lindner V, Reidy MA. Proliferation of smooth muscle cells after vascular injury is inhibited by an antibody against basic fibroblast growth factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:3739-3743.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Nguyen HC, Steinberg BM, LeBoutillier M III, Baumann FG, Rifkin DB, Grossi EA, Galloway AC. Suppression of neointimal lesions after vascular injury: a role for polyclonal anti-basic fibroblast growth factor antibody. Surgery. 1994;116:456-462.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

43. Jaye M, Lyall RM, Mudd R, Schlessinger J, Sarver N. Expression of acidic fibroblast growth factor cDNA confers growth advantage and tumorigenesis to Swiss 3T3 cells. EMBO J. 1988;7:963-969.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Bunnag P, Waddell KS, Varban ML, Chiu IM. Transformed phenotype conferred to NIH/3T3 cells by ectopic expression of heparin-binding growth factor-1/acidic fibroblast growth factor. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol. 1991;27:89-96.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

45. Bikfalvi A, Klein S, Pintucci G, Quarto N, Mignatti P, Rifkin DB. Differential modulation of cell phenotype by different molecular weight forms of basic fibroblast growth factor: possible intracellular signaling by the high molecular weight forms. J Cell Biol. 1995;129:233-243.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

46. Coltrini D, Gualandris A, Nelli EE, Parolini S, Molinari-Tosatti MP, Quarto N, Ziche M, Giavazzi R, Presta M. Growth advantage and vascularization induced by basic fibroblast growth factor overexpression in endometrial HEC-1-B cells: an export-dependent mechanism of action. Cancer Res. 1995;55:4729-4738.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. Ali S, Davis MG, Becker MW, Dorn GW II. Thromboxane A2 stimulates vascular smooth muscle hypertrophy by up-regulating the synthesis and release of endogenous basic fibroblast growth factor. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:17397-17403.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Itoh H, Mukoyama M, Pratt RE, Gibbons GH, Dzau VJ. Multiple autocrine growth factors modulate vascular smooth muscle cell growth response to angiotensin II. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:2268-2274.

49. Koibuchi Y, Lee WS, Gibbons GH, Pratt RE. Role of transforming growth factor-ß1 in the cellular growth response to angiotensin II. Hypertension. 1993;21:1046-1050.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

50. Ali S, Becker MW, Davis MG, Dorn GW II. Dissociation of vasoconstrictor-stimulated basic fibroblast growth factor expression from hypertrophic growth in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells: relevant roles of protein kinase C. Circ Res. 1994;75:836-843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

51. Gay CG, Winkles JA. Interleukin 1 regulates heparin-binding growth factor 2 gene expression in vascular smooth muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:296-300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

52. Winkles JA, Gay CG. Serum, phorbol ester, and polypeptide mitogens increase class 1 and 2 heparin-binding (acidic and basic fibroblast) growth factor gene expression in human vascular smooth muscle cells. Cell Growth Differ. 1991;2:531-540.[Abstract]

53. Sato Y, Hamanaka R, Ono J, Kuwano M, Rifkin DB, Takaki R. The stimulatory effect of PDGF on vascular smooth muscle cell migration is mediated by the induction of endogenous basic FGF. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;174:1260-1266.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

54. Weiss RH, Maduri M. The mitogenic effect of thrombin in vascular smooth muscle cells is largely due to basic fibroblast growth factor. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:5724-5727.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

55. Alberts GF, Hsu DKW, Peifley KA, Winkles JA. Differential regulation of acidic and basic fibroblast growth factor gene expression in fibroblast growth factor–treated rat aortic smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1994;75:261-267.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

56. Brogi E, Wu T, Namiki A, Isner JM. Indirect angiogenic cytokines upregulate VEGF and bFGF gene expression in vascular smooth muscle cells, whereas hypoxia upregulates VEGF expression only. Circulation. 1994;90:649-652.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

57. Gay CG, Winkles JA. The half-lives of platelet-derived growth factor A- and B-chain mRNAs are similar in endothelial cells and unaffected by heparin-binding growth factor-1 or cycloheximide. J Cell Physiol. 1991;147:121-127.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

58. Tomita M, Hirata Y, Uchihashi M, Fujita T. Characterization of epidermal growth factor receptors in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells of rat aorta. Endocrinol Jpn. 1986;33:177-184.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

59. Nanney LB, Stoscheck CM, King LE. Characterization of binding and receptors for epidermal growth factor in smooth muscle. Cell Tissue Res. 1988;254:125-132.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

60. Scott-Burden T, Resink TJ, Baur U, Burgin M, Buhler FR. Epidermal growth factor responsiveness in smooth muscle cells from hypertensive and normotensive rats. Hypertension. 1989;13:295-304.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

61. Epstein SE, Siegall CB, Biro S, Fu Y, Fitzgerald D, Pastan I. Cytotoxic effects of a recombinant chimeric toxin on rapidly proliferating vascular smooth muscle cells. Circulation. 1991;84:778-787.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

62. Berk BC, Brock TA, Webb RC, Taubman MB, Atkinson WJ, Gimbrone MA Jr, Alexander RW. Epidermal growth factor, a vascular smooth muscle mitogen, induces rat aortic contraction. J Clin Invest. 1985;75:1083-1086.

63. MacDonald RG, Panush RS, Pepine CJ. Rationale for use of glucocorticoids in modification of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1987;60:56B-60B.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

64. Longenecker JP, Kilty LA, Johnson LK. Glucocorticoid inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation: influence of homologous extracellular matrix and serum mitogens. J Cell Biol. 1984;98:534-540.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

65. Voisard R, Seitzer U, Baur R, Dartsch PC, Osterhues H, Hoher M, Hombach V. Corticosteroid agents inhibit proliferation of smooth muscle cells from human atherosclerotic arteries in vitro. Int J Cardiol. 1994;43:257-267.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

66. Chervu A, Moore WS, Quinones-Baldrich WJ, Henderson T. Efficacy of corticosteroids in suppression of intimal hyperplasia. J Vasc Surg. 1989;10:129-134.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

67. Colburn MD, Moore WS, Gelabert HA, Quinones-Baldrich WJ. Dose responsive suppression of myointimal hyperplasia by dexamethasone. J Vasc Surg. 1992;15:510-518.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

68. Villa AE, Guzman LA, Chen W, Golomb G, Levy RJ, Topol EJ. Local delivery of dexamethasone for prevention of neointimal proliferation in a rat model of balloon angioplasty. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:1243-1249.

69. Shing Y, Folkman J, Sullivan R, Butterfield C, Murray J, Klagsbrun M. Heparin affinity: purification of a tumor-derived capillary endothelial cell growth factor. Science. 1984;223:1296-1299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

70. Mignatti P, Morimoto T, Rifkin DB. Basic fibroblast growth factor, a protein devoid of secretory signal sequence, is released by cells via a pathway independent of the endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi complex. J Cell Physiol. 1992;151:81-93.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

71. Florkiewicz RZ, Majack RA, Buechler RD, Florkiewicz E. Quantitative export of FGF-2 occurs through an alternative, energy-dependent, non-ER/Golgi pathway. J Cell Physiol. 1995;162:388-399.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

72. Moscatelli D. High and low affinity binding sites for basic fibroblast growth factor on cultured cells: absence of a role for low affinity binding in the stimulation of plasminogen activator production by bovine capillary endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol. 1987;131:123-130.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

73. Vlodavsky I, Folkman J, Sullivan R, Fridman R, Ishai Michaeli R, Sasse J, Klagsbrun M. Endothelial cell-derived basic fibroblast growth factor: synthesis and deposition into subendothelial extracellular matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:2292-2296.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

74. Rogelj S, Klagsbrun M, Atzmon R, Kurokawa M, Haimovitz A, Fuks Z, Vlodavsky I. Basic fibroblast growth factor is an extracellular matrix component required for supporting the proliferation of vascular endothelial cells and the differentiation of PC12 cells. J Cell Biol. 1989;109:823-831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

75. Powell PP, Klagsbrun M. Three forms of rat basic fibroblast growth factor are made from a single mRNA and localize to the nucleus. J Cell Physiol. 1991;148:202-210.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

76. Kobrin MS, Funatomi H, Friess H, Buchler MW, Stathis P, Korc M. Induction and expression of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor in human pancreatic cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1994;202:1705-1709.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

77. Barnard JA, Graves-Deal R, Pittelkow MR, DuBois R, Cook P, Ramsey GW, Bishop PR, Damstrup L, Coffey RJ. Auto- and cross-induction within the mammalian epidermal growth factor-related peptide family. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:22817-22822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

78. Kevil C, Carter P, Hu B, DeBenedetti A. Translational enhancement of FGF-2 by eIF-4 factors, and alternate utilization of CUG and AUG codons for translation initiation. Oncogene. 1995;11:2339-2348.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

79. Vagner S, Gensac M-C, Maret A, Bayard F, Amalric F, Prats H, Prats A-C. Alternative translation of human fibroblast growth factor 2 mRNA occurs by internal entry of ribosomes. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:35-44.[Abstract]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
J. Liu, C. B. Rich, J. A. Buczek-Thomas, M. A. Nugent, M. P. Panchenko, and J. A. Foster
Heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor regulates elastin and FGF-2 expression in pulmonary fibroblasts
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, November 1, 2003; 285(5): L1106 - L1115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
G. Ghiselli, J. Chen, M. Kaou, H. Hallak, and R. Rubin
Ethanol Inhibits Fibroblast Growth Factor-Induced Proliferation of Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, October 1, 2003; 23(10): 1808 - 1813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Interv.Home page
W. T. Gerthoffer and C. A. Singer
Secretory Functions of Smooth Muscle: Cytokines and Growth Factors
Mol. Interv., November 1, 2002; 2(7): 447 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
S. Ogata, N. Yorioka, and N. Kohno
Glucose and Prednisolone Alter Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Expression in Peritoneal Mesothelial Cells and Fibroblasts
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2001; 12(12): 2787 - 2796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
B. C. Berk
Vascular Smooth Muscle Growth: Autocrine Growth Mechanisms
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2001; 81(3): 999 - 1030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
L. Zhang, A. B. Rice, K. Adler, P. Sannes, L. Martin, W. Gladwell, J.-S. Koo, T. E. Gray, and J. C. Bonner
Vanadium Stimulates Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells to Produce Heparin-Binding Epidermal Growth Factor-Like Growth Factor . A Mitogen for Lung Fibroblasts
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., February 1, 2001; 24(2): 123 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peifley, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Winkles, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peifley, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Winkles, J. A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CYCLOHEXIMIDE
*DACTINOMYCIN
*DEXAMETHASONE
*HEPARIN