Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1996;78:769-779

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Worrall, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Worrall, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, T. B., Jr
(Circulation Research. 1996;78:769-779.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Inhibition of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Prevents Myocardial and Systemic Vascular Barrier Dysfunction During Early Cardiac Allograft Rejection

Presented in part at the 67th Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, Dallas, Tex, November 14-17, 1994.

Neil K. Worrall, Kathy Chang, Gloria M. Suau, Wanda S. Allison, Thomas P. Misko, Patrick M. Sullivan, Ronald G. Tilton, Joseph R. Williamson, T. Bruce Ferguson, Jr

From the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery (N.K.W., G.M.S., T.B.F.), and the Department of Pathology (K.C., W.S.A., R.G.T., J.R.W.), Washington University School of Medicine, and the Departments of Molecular Pharmacology (T.P.M.) and Cellular and Molecular Biology (P.M.S.), Searle Research and Development, Monsanto Co, St Louis, Mo.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract NO is produced during cardiac allograft rejection by expression of inducible NO synthase (iNOS) in the rejecting heart. Recent evidence indicates that NO modulates vascular permeability under both physiological and pathophysiological conditions. The present study explored the effects of early acute cardiac allograft rejection, and specifically the effects of NO, on myocardial and systemic vascular barrier function using a quantitative double-tracer permeation method in a rat cardiac transplant model. Early allograft rejection increased albumin permeation twofold to fivefold in the allograft heart and systemic vasculature (brain, lung, sciatic nerve, diaphragm, retina, muscle, kidney, and uvea) compared with isografts and controls. There were no detectable differences in regional blood flow or hemodynamics, suggesting that increased albumin permeation resulted from increased vascular permeability. iNOS mRNA was expressed in the allograft heart and native lung and was associated with increased serum nitrite/nitrate levels. iNOS inhibition with aminoguanidine prevented or attenuated allograft heart and systemic vascular barrier dysfunction and reduced allograft serum nitrite/nitrate levels to isograft values. Aminoguanidine did not affect the mild histological changes of rejection present in allografts. These data demonstrate the novel observations that (1) endothelial barrier function is compromised in the systemic vasculature, particularly in the brain, remote from the site of allograft rejection; (2) allograft vascular barrier dysfunction is associated with increased NO production and iNOS mRNA expression in the affected tissues (eg, native lung and grafted heart); and (3) inhibition of NO production by iNOS prevents vascular barrier dysfunction in the allograft heart and systemic vasculature.


Key Words: blood-brain barrier • capillary permeability • endothelium • nitric oxide • cardiac transplantation


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Although cardiac transplantation has evolved into an effective therapeutic option in the management of end-stage heart disease, its overall clinical success is limited by acute and chronic allograft rejection. The host immune response to allogeneic tissue is characterized by the accumulation of an intense inflammatory cell infiltrate in the graft that ultimately results in destruction of the transplanted organ. The microvascular endothelium is recognized to be an active participant in inflammatory processes, including acute allograft rejection.1 2 3 The barrier function of vascular endothelium regulates movement of macromolecules, solutes, and blood cells across vessel walls into tissues and is modulated by various mechanisms. Endothelial activation during allograft rejection is characterized by (1) expression of adhesion molecules in the rejecting organ,1 2 3 (2) migration of leukocytes into the allograft,4 (3) increased graft microvascular permeation by plasma proteins and fluid,5 and (4) edema formation in the allograft.4 The free radical NO has recently been implicated in mediating increased vascular permeation by macromolecules during endotoxin-induced uveitis6 and meningitis,7 in solid neoplasms,8 in diabetic animals,9 10 in response to increased blood flow,11 and in response to agonists such as endotoxin,12 endothelin-1,13 substance P,14 carageenin,15 leukotriene C4,16 histamine,17 18 and ADP and bradykinin.19 NO is synthesized from the amino acid L-arginine by the NOS family of enzymes and is involved in diverse physiological and pathophysiological processes, including host immune defense, allograft rejection, vasoregulation, neurotransmission, and diabetes.20 21 22 23

NO is produced during cardiac allograft rejection by expression of the inducible isoform of NOS, iNOS, in the rejecting heart.22 23 Treatment of cardiac allograft recipients with aminoguanidine, a selective iNOS inhibitor,9 24 25 26 significantly attenuated acute rejection, as demonstrated by prolonged graft survival and improved graft contractile function.23 The role of NO in mediating endothelial barrier dysfunction in the transplanted organ has not been described. The systemic sequelae of clinical transplant rejection suggested that allograft rejection may also cause systemic vascular barrier dysfunction. The possibility that increased NO production may at least partially mediate systemic vascular dysfunction during allograft rejection was suggested by observations that (1) vasoactive cytokines such as TNF-{alpha}, IL-1, and {gamma}-IFN, which are expressed during allograft rejection27 and can induce iNOS expression in endothelial cells,20 21 have been detected in the systemic circulation during allograft rejection28 29 and (2) NO can react with sulfhydryl groups of plasma proteins to form biologically active NO adducts.30 31 32 33 The present study explored the effects of early cardiac allograft rejection, and specifically the effects of increased NO production, on myocardial and systemic vascular barrier function using a quantitative double-tracer permeation method in a rat model of cardiac transplantation.

The present study determined that early allograft rejection increased vascular albumin permeation in the grafted heart and the systemic vasculature (particularly in the brain) before significant necrosis of the grafted organ and in the absence of alterations of tissue blood flow or hemodynamic parameters. Allograft vascular barrier dysfunction was associated with increased NO production and with iNOS mRNA expression in the affected tissues (eg, native lung and grafted heart). Inhibition of iNOS with aminoguanidine prevented or attenuated endothelial barrier dysfunction in both the grafted heart and the systemic vasculature.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Heterotopic Cardiac Transplant Model
Male 220- to 270-g Lewis (RT-1l major histocompatability antigen haplotype) and ACI (RT-1a) rats were purchased from Harlan-Sprague-Dawley (Indianapolis, Ind). Animals received standard rat chow and water ad libitum and were housed and cared for in accordance with guidelines set forth by the Washington University Committee for the Humane Care of Laboratory Animals and the National Institutes of Health regarding laboratory animal welfare. Allogeneic (Lewis donor to ACI recipient) and syngeneic (ACI to ACI) heterotopic intra-abdominal cardiac transplantation was performed as described previously.23 34 Briefly, after aseptic preparation of the skin of the donor and recipient animals, anesthesia was induced with subcutaneous ketamine (100 mg/kg) and inhaled methoxyflurane. After preparation of the recipient's infrarenal abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava, the donor heart was rapidly excised after hypothermic arrest and ligation of the venae cavae and pulmonary veins. Iced saline was used for topical cooling, and the donor aorta and pulmonary artery were anastomosed to the recipient aorta and inferior vena cava, respectively. A sham operation, consisting of laparotomy, cross-clamping of the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava for 30 minutes, phlebotomy of 0.5 mL of blood, and immediate replacement with 2 mL of 0.9% NaCl, was also performed.

Aminoguanidine Administration
Immediately after transplantation or sham operation, the right external jugular vein was cannulated with a silicone catheter connected to an ALZET osmotic infusion pump (model 2ML1, ALZA Corp) implanted in the intrascapular subcutaneous space. Isografts and allografts received continuous intravenous infusion of aminoguanidine hemisulfate in 0.9% NaCl (375 mg·kg-1·d-1) from the time of transplantation until determination of vascular albumin permeation on POD 4. Sham-operated animals received continuous intravenous infusion of 0.9% NaCl in a similar manner. Normal animals received aminoguanidine in a similar manner for 72 hours before determination of vascular albumin permeation.

Assessment of Vascular Albumin Permeation, Regional Blood Flow, and Hemodynamic Parameters
Eight experimental groups of rats were studied (all on POD 4, except as listed): normal ACI group (n=16), aminoguanidine-treated normal ACI group (n=3), sham-operated ACI group (n=7), ACI to ACI isograft group (n=11), aminoguanidine-treated isograft group (n=6), Lewis to ACI allograft group (n=11), aminoguanidine-treated allograft group (n=10), and allograft group on POD 6 (n=2). Ten additional animals were excluded from analysis because of perioperative death, death during cannulation for the vascular albumin permeation measurements, or the presence of a unilateral kidney or infarct in the grafted heart.

Regional vascular albumin permeation was determined by a well-described9 10 35 36 quantitative isotope dilution technique based on the sequential injection of albumin labeled with two different iodine isotopes. [125I]BSA was used to quantify vascular albumin filtration after 10 minutes of tracer circulation. [131I]BSA circulated for 2 minutes and served as a plasma volume marker to allow for correction of the [125I]BSA activity contained within the tissue vasculature, assuming that little or no [131I]BSA was filtered across the endothelium during this short time period.37 If [131I]BSA did permeate across the endothelium during this short circulation time, then the correction would overestimate the intravascular content of [125I]BSA and, consequently, underestimate the degree of permeation across the endothelium. 46Sc-labeled microspheres were injected for simultaneous measurement of regional blood flow and hemodynamic parameters.10

Animal and Radiolabeled Tracer Preparation
Rats were anesthetized with thiopental (65 mg/kg body wt, injected intraperitoneally), and core body temperature was maintained at 37±0.5°C using heat lamps and a 37°C surgical tray. The left femoral vein, right carotid artery, and both iliac arteries were cannulated with polyethylene tubing (0.58-mm internal diameter) filled with heparinized saline (400 U heparin/mL). The left femoral vein cannula was used for tracer injection, and the right iliac artery cannula was connected to a pressure transducer for BP monitoring. The left iliac artery cannula was connected to a 1-mL syringe attached to a Harvard Bioscience model 940 constant-withdrawal pump set at 0.055 mL/min. The tip of the right carotid artery cannula was advanced into the left ventricle of the native heart and was used for injection of radiolabeled microspheres. The trachea was intubated and connected to a small-rodent respirator for continuous ventilatory support. 125I, 131I, and 46Sc were from DuPont-NEN. Purified monomer BSA (1 mg) was iodinated with 1 mCi of 125I or 131I by the iodogen method as described previously.10

Experimental Procedure
Vascular albumin permeation and blood flow were assessed simultaneously. At time 0, [125I]BSA (in 0.2 mL of saline) was injected intravenously, and the withdrawal pump was started. Eight minutes later, 0.2 mL of [131]BSA was injected, and 1 minute later, 46Sc-labeled 11.4-µm microspheres were injected slowly over {approx}30 seconds. At the 10-minute mark, the native heart was excised to stop all blood flow, the withdrawal pump was stopped, and various organs/tissues were removed for analysis of tracer content by {gamma}-spectrometry. The left cerebral and cerebellar hemispheres were removed en bloc, and the left eye was dissected as described previously.35 36 Tissue samples and arterial plasma samples were weighed before determination of 125I, 131I, and 46Sc activities in a {gamma}-spectrometer interfaced with a DEC-5000 computer (Digital Equipment Corp), in which data were corrected for background and stored for subsequent analysis. Tissue dry weights were determined after drying in an 80°C oven for 1 week.

Data Analysis
A quantitative index of [125I]BSA tissue clearance was calculated as previously described9 10 35 36 and expressed as micrograms plasma per gram tissue wet weight per minute. Briefly, [125I]BSA activity in each tissue was corrected for tissue intravascular content of this tracer by subtracting the product of [131I]BSA tissue activity multiplied by the ratio of [125I]BSA to [131I]BSA activities in the arterial plasma sample obtained at the end of the experiment. Vascular-corrected [125I]BSA tissue activity was divided by the time-averaged [125I]BSA plasma activity (obtained from a well-mixed sample of plasma taken from the withdrawal syringe) and the tracer circulation time (10 minutes) and then normalized per gram tissue wet weight. To calculate regional blood flows, total 46Sc activity in each tissue was divided by total 46Sc activity in the reference blood sample obtained from the withdrawal syringe, then multiplied by the pump withdrawal rate, and expressed as milliliters per gram tissue wet weight per minute.10 36 Local vascular resistance in each tissue was determined by dividing the animal's mean arterial BP by blood flow to that tissue. Cardiac output was calculated by dividing total counts per minute of 46Sc injected by the 46Sc activity in the withdrawal pump sample and then multiplied by the pump withdrawal rate.38 Peripheral resistance was derived by dividing mean arterial BP by cardiac output. Tissue wet weight–to–dry weight ratios were calculated.

Spectrofluorometric Determination of Serum Nitrite/Nitrate
Systemic arterial serum nitrite/nitrate levels were measured in 0.2-mL blood samples taken from the left iliac artery cannula before tracer injection. Red blood cells were removed by centrifugation, and the resulting serum was filtered through an Ultrafree-MC microcentrifuge filter (Millipore Corp) to remove hemoglobin resulting from cell lysis. After conversion of nitrate to nitrite with nitrate reductase, total nitrite was measured by reaction with 2,3-diaminonaphthalene (Aldrich Chemical Co; all other chemicals were from Sigma Chemical Co) under acidic conditions to form 1-(H)-naphthotriazole, a fluorescent product, as described previously.39 Formation of 1-(H)-naphthotriazole was measured using a Pandex fluorescent plate reader (IDEXX Laboratories) with excitation at 365 nm and emission read at 450 nm.

iNOS mRNA Detection
Tissue was harvested by rapid excision and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and total RNA was then extracted using guanidinium thiocyanate as described previously.40 mRNA expression was analyzed by ribonuclease protection assay using an Ambion RPA II kit. Duplicate 5-µg samples of total RNA were hybridized to 1x105 cpm of 32P-labeled rat iNOS antisense RNA probe. The iNOS probe was generated from lipopolysaccharide-stimulated rat white blood cell RNA by reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction amplification of a 907-base iNOS fragment (corresponding to bases 509 to 1415 of the rat iNOS coding region), as described previously,23 and cloned into the Invitrogen pCRII vector. The 295-base iNOS probe was then generated by linearization with Bsa I and transcription with T7 polymerase. RNase digestion after probe hybridization to rat tissue iNOS mRNA leaves a protected fragment of 227 bases in length, corresponding to bases 1189 to 1415 of the coding region of rat iNOS. Rat GAPDH riboprobe was purchased from Ambion and used as an internal control. Fragments were separated by electrophoresis on an 8% polyacrylamide/8 mol/L urea gel and visualized by autoradiography.

In Vivo ecNOS Activity
In vivo ecNOS activity was assessed by measuring the peak increase in mean arterial BP following intravenous injection of the NOS inhibitor L-NMMA. Allografts and aminoguanidine-treated allografts (375 mg·kg-1·d-1 IV beginning at time of transplantation as in permeation experiments) were anesthetized on POD 4 with thiopental (65 mg/kg body wt, injected intraperitoneally), core body temperature was maintained at 37±0.5°C using heat lamps and a 37°C surgical tray, and the left femoral vein and artery were cannulated as described above. After stabilization of arterial BP, increasing amounts of L-NMMA in a constant volume (0.5 mL/kg) were injected intravenously, and the peak percentage increase in mean arterial BP from baseline was recorded for each dose of L-NMMA.

Histology
At the time of measurement of vascular albumin permeation, a portion of the grafted heart was excised, fixed in 10% neutral buffered formaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned. After staining with hematoxylin and eosin, grafted hearts were graded for acute rejection using a modification of Billingham's criteria.4 In a masked fashion, four separate sections from each specimen were graded for both interstitial infiltrate and myocyte necrosis as follows: 0, no infiltrate or necrosis; 1, mild scattered mononuclear infiltrate or rare necrosis; 2, moderate infiltrate or patchy necrosis; 3, moderately severe infiltrate or necrosis; 4, severe infiltrate or necrosis; and 5, complete rejection.

Statistical Analysis
Tissue vascular albumin permeation, regional blood flow, tissue vascular resistance, and tissue wet–to–dry weight ratios were compared between groups using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD post hoc test because of multiple comparisons. Body weight, hematocrit, hemodynamic parameters, and serum nitrite/nitrate levels were also compared using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD post hoc test. Histological scores were compared using Student's t test. BP response to L-NMMA was compared using repeated-measures ANOVA with one factor. Data were analyzed using SYSTAT 5.0 (SYSTAT Inc) and are reported as mean±SD, with P<.05 considered to indicate statistical significance.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Effect of Early Allograft Rejection on Graft Vascular Albumin Permeation
Vascular albumin permeation in the native heart did not differ between groups (Fig 1Down). Vascular albumin permeation in the isograft transplanted heart (subsequently referred to as the isograft heart) was increased twofold versus the isograft native heart. Vascular albumin permeation in the allograft transplanted heart (subsequently referred to as the allograft heart) was increased fourfold versus the allograft native heart and twofold versus the isograft heart. Similar endothelial dysfunction was observed in the allograft heart on POD 6 (n=2; 3301 and 3327 µg plasma·g tissue wt-1·min-1, respectively).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Increased vascular albumin permeation in the transplanted heart during early cardiac allograft rejection. Albumin permeation was measured in the native heart of normal ACI rats (CONTROL, n=16), aminoguanidine-treated ACI rats (CON+AG, n=3), and sham-operated ACI rats on POD 4 (SHAM, n=7); and in the native and transplanted hearts on POD 4 in isografts (ISO, n=11), aminoguanidine-treated isografts (ISO+AG, n=6), allografts (ALLO, n=11), and aminoguanidine-treated allografts (ALLO+AG, n=10) as described in "Materials and Methods." Albumin permeation in the native heart did not differ between groups, but the allograft heart was significantly more permeable than the allograft native heart and the isograft heart. Aminoguanidine reduced the increased albumin permeation in the allograft heart to isograft levels but did not affect permeation in the isograft heart or in any of the animals' native hearts (P>.6). Values are mean±SD, by ANOVA with Tukey's HSD post hoc correction for multiple comparisons. *P=.0001 vs isograft heart, aminoguanidine-treated allograft heart, and allograft native heart; {dagger}P=.0001 for grafted heart vs animal's native heart; {ddagger}P=.05 for grafted heart vs animal's native heart.

Effect of Early Allograft Rejection on Systemic Vascular Albumin Permeation
Vascular albumin permeation was significantly increased in the brain, sciatic nerve, forelimb muscle, retina, uvea, diaphragm, lung, and kidney of the allograft group compared with the control, sham-operated, and isograft groups (Fig 2Down). Similar increases in systemic vascular permeation were present in the allograft group on POD 6 (n=2; eg, brain, 276 and 288 µg plasma·g tissue wt-1·min-1; lung, 2643 and 3014 µg plasma·g tissue wt-1·min-1; and muscle, 151 and 149 µg plasma·g tissue wt-1·min-1). Vascular albumin permeation in the isograft group was increased above the levels found in the control and/or sham group in the brain, sciatic nerve, retina, and diaphragm. There were no detectable differences in vascular albumin permeation in any of the tissues examined in sham-operated animals compared with control animals (P>=.5 versus control animals for each tissue). There was no detectable difference between groups for vascular albumin permeation in the thoracic aorta, skin, jejunum, or spleen (data not shown).



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Increased systemic vascular albumin permeation during early cardiac allograft rejection. Albumin permeation was measured in the systemic tissues of normal ACI rats (CONTROL, n=16) and aminoguanidine-treated ACI rats (CON+AG, n=3); and on POD 4 in sham-operated ACI rats (SHAM, n=7), isografts (ISO, n=11), aminoguanidine-treated isografts (ISO+AG, n=6), allografts (ALLO, n=11), and aminoguanidine-treated allografts (ALLO+AG, n=10) as described in "Materials and Methods." Vascular albumin permeation in the allograft systemic vasculature was significantly increased above control, sham, and isograft levels. Aminoguanidine reduced allograft systemic vascular albumin permeation to isograft levels but did not affect vascular albumin permeation in control and isograft tissues (P>.9). Values are mean±SD, compared by ANOVA with Tukey's HSD post hoc correction for multiple comparisons. *P<.0005 vs control, sham, isograft, and aminoguanidine-treated allograft; {dagger}P<.0005 vs control and sham and {dagger}P<.005 vs isograft and aminoguanidine-treated allograft; {ddagger}P<.0005 vs control and sham, {ddagger}P<.01 vs isograft, and {ddagger}P<.05 vs aminoguanidine-treated allograft; §P<.0005 vs control, §P<.005 versus sham and isograft, and §P<.05 vs aminoguanidine-treated allograft; ||P<.0005 vs control and ||P<.05 vs sham; ¶P<.01 vs control and sham; #P<.005 vs control; and **P<.05 vs control.

NO Production and iNOS mRNA Expression
Arterial serum nitrite/nitrate levels, which are stable breakdown products of NO and thus reflect NO production, were determined at the time of measurement of vascular albumin permeation on POD 4 (Table 1Down). Similar to our previous findings,23 allograft serum nitrite/nitrate levels were significantly elevated above control, sham, and isograft levels. Aminoguanidine treatment reduced allograft serum nitrite/nitrate levels to isograft values. Aminoguanidine treatment had no effect on isograft serum nitrite/nitrate levels (P=.99).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Serum Nitrite/Nitrate Levels

Ribonuclease protection assay analysis demonstrated that elevated allograft serum nitrite/nitrate levels were associated with iNOS mRNA expression in the allograft heart (Fig 3Down). iNOS mRNA was not detected in isograft or control hearts. Lung tissue was also analyzed to determine if allograft systemic vascular barrier function was associated with iNOS expression in systemic tissues. iNOS mRNA was present in left lung tissue from all three cardiac allografts examined but was not present in isograft or control lungs (Fig 3Down; iNOS mRNA expression was not examined in other systemic tissues affected by the rejection process).



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. iNOS mRNA was expressed in the allograft native lung and grafted heart during early cardiac allograft rejection (POD 4) but was not detected in control or isograft tissues. iNOS mRNA expression was determined by ribonuclease protection assay in (1) control hearts (n =2) and the grafted hearts from isografts (n=2) and allografts (n=2) and (2) the left lung from the same animals and one additional isograft and allograft, as described in "Materials and Methods." GAPDH expression is shown as an internal control to allow comparison between animals. Lanes are as follows: 1, undigested probe; 2, no protection with tRNA; 3 and 4, normal control hearts; 5 and 6, isograft hearts; 7 and 8, allograft hearts; 9 and 10, control lungs; 11 to 13, isograft native lungs; 14 to 16, allograft native lungs; and 17 and 18, two additional control lungs demonstrating that lack of iNOS mRNA in lanes 9 and 10 did not result from underloading of RNA. (The same results were obtained with duplicate samples.)

Effect of Aminoguanidine on Graft and Systemic Vascular Albumin Permeation
Given that allograft vascular barrier dysfunction was associated with increased NO production and iNOS mRNA expression in the allograft native lung and grafted heart, we examined whether increased graft and systemic vascular albumin permeation was mediated by NO. Aminoguanidine treatment reduced vascular albumin permeation in the allograft heart to baseline isograft levels (Fig 1Up, P=.0001 versus untreated allograft hearts and P=.3 versus isograft hearts). Similarly, aminoguanidine treatment reduced systemic vascular albumin permeation to isograft and/or control levels in all affected allograft tissues (Fig 2Up, P>=.6 versus isograft group). To determine if the aminoguanidine-mediated reduction in allograft heart and systemic vascular albumin permeation was an effect of aminoguanidine on the endothelium independent of the rejection process, we assessed the effect of aminoguanidine on albumin permeation in control and isograft animals. Aminoguanidine did not affect albumin permeation in normal animal tissues or in the isograft heart or systemic tissues (Figs 1Up and 2Up; P>=.9 versus untreated controls and isografts, respectively).

Effect of Rejection and Aminoguanidine on Tissue Water Content
Significantly higher tissue wet weight–to–dry weight ratios were demonstrated in the brain, lung, and grafted heart in the allograft group compared with the control and isograft groups (Table 2Down; not measured in other organs with increased vascular albumin permeation). Aminoguanidine treatment significantly reduced or prevented the increased tissue water content in allograft tissues.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Tissue Wet Weight–to–Dry Weight Ratios

Regional Blood Flow, Tissue Vascular Resistance, and Hemodynamics
Tissue blood flow and vascular resistance were determined using 46Sc-labeled microspheres (Table 3Down). Regional blood flow and/or tissue vascular resistance in the uvea and sciatic nerve were different in the sham, isograft, and/or allograft groups versus the control group. However, there were no differences in blood flow or vascular resistance in the uvea and sciatic nerve between the isograft and allograft groups. There were no detectable intergroup differences in regional blood flow or vascular resistance in the rest of the tissues. Blood flow and vascular resistance in the grafted heart were not different between groups but were significantly less than in the native heart in each of the groups (P<.01). Aminoguanidine treatment had no effect on tissue blood flow or vascular resistance in any tissue in the allograft, isograft, or control groups (Table 3Down; data not shown for aminoguanidine-treated isograft and control groups).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Regional Blood Flow and Tissue Vascular Resistance

Hematocrit, cardiac output, and total peripheral resistance were different from control values in some experimental groups (Table 4Down). However, there were no detectable differences in hematocrit, mean systemic arterial BP, cardiac output, total peripheral resistance, and body weight between the sham, isograft, and allograft groups. Aminoguanidine treatment had no effect on hemodynamic parameters in the control, isograft, or allograft groups (data not shown for aminoguanidine-treated control or isograft groups).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. General and Hemodynamic Parameters

Effect of Aminoguanidine on ecNOS Activity
To determine if aminoguanidine treatment selectively inhibited iNOS in this model, in vivo ecNOS activity was assessed on POD 4 in the allograft group and aminoguanidine-treated allograft group (same dose as permeation experiments). The peak increase in mean arterial BP following intravenous injections of increasing amounts of L-NMMA was measured. There was no detectable effect of aminoguanidine treatment on the BP response to L-NMMA infusion (Fig 4Down, P>.5).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Aminoguanidine treatment did not significantly inhibit in vivo ecNOS activity in allografts. ecNOS activity was assessed on POD 4 in allografts (ALLO) and aminoguanidine-treated allografts (ALLO+AG, 375 mg·kg-1·d-1 continuous intravenous infusion beginning at time of transplantation as in permeation experiments) by measuring the peak increase in mean arterial BP after intravenous injection of increasing amounts of L-NMMA. There was no effect of aminoguanidine treatment on the BP response to L-NMMA (P>.5). Results are percentage increase above baseline. Values are mean±SD (n=4) (compared by repeated-measures ANOVA with one factor).

Effect of Aminoguanidine on Graft Histology
The untreated allograft group demonstrated mild histological changes consistent with an early time point in the rejection process. There was a patchy mononuclear infiltrate and scattered areas of myocyte necrosis. There was no detectable effect of aminoguanidine treatment on the degree of mononuclear infiltrate (histological score of 1.4±0.4 versus 1.3±0.4 [0 to 5 scale]) or myocyte necrosis (1.6±0.3 versus 1.5±0.3 [0 to 5 scale], n=6, P>.7 for infiltrate and necrosis) at this early time point in the rejection process.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
We and others have recently demonstrated that iNOS is expressed in cardiac allografts during acute rejection.22 23 Furthermore, we have demonstrated that inhibition of iNOS with aminoguanidine attenuated acute rejection, as manifested by prolonged graft survival, improved graft contractile function, and reduced myocyte necrosis and leukocyte migration into the graft.23 These observations prompted the present investigation examining the effect of early allograft rejection, and specifically the effect of increased NO production, on myocardial and systemic vascular barrier function. The data in the present study indicate that during early cardiac allograft rejection (1) vascular permeation by macromolecules is increased in the allograft heart and systemic vasculature and is associated with increased tissue water content, (2) allograft vascular barrier dysfunction is associated with increased NO production and iNOS mRNA expression in the affected tissues (eg, native lung and grafted heart), and (3) inhibition of iNOS with aminoguanidine prevented or significantly attenuated endothelial barrier dysfunction and the increased tissue water content in the allograft heart and systemic vasculature. Increased vascular permeation in the rejecting heart is consistent with previous observations.5 To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating that (1) systemic vascular barrier function is compromised in allograft recipients and (2) inhibition of NO production by iNOS prevents or attenuates endothelial barrier dysfunction in both the grafted heart and the systemic vasculature.

Mechanisms of Endothelial Dysfunction
Role of NO
The likelihood that NO contributed to increased graft and systemic vascular permeation in allograft recipients is supported by (1) iNOS mRNA expression in allograft tissues that demonstrated vascular barrier dysfunction (eg, native lung and grafted heart), (2) elevated serum nitrite/nitrate levels in allografts that were reduced to isograft values with aminoguanidine, (3) reduction of increased albumin permeation and increased tissue water content in the allograft heart and all affected systemic tissues to isograft and/or control levels with aminoguanidine, (4) observations that selective iNOS inhibition with aminoguanidine attenuated increased vascular permeation by macromolecules in diabetic animals9 10 and during endotoxin-induced uveitis6 and meningitis,7 and (5) reports that NOS inhibitors attenuated increased vascular permeation caused by various agonists.12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

We and others have demonstrated that aminoguanidine is 10-fold to 100-fold selective for iNOS versus ecNOS.9 24 25 26 The aminoguanidine dose used in the present study is similar to that used in our previous in vivo studies,6 23 41 ie, 400 to 600 mg·kg-1·d-1. The selectivity of aminoguanidine for iNOS rather than ecNOS in the present study is demonstrated by (1) no difference in mean arterial BP between aminoguanidine-treated and untreated animals and (2) no detectable effect of aminoguanidine treatment on in vivo BP response to L-NMMA infusion. Aminoguanidine has effects other than inhibiting iNOS, including reducing advanced glycation end-product formation42 and inhibiting diamine oxidase43 and aldose reductase.44 However, these effects are unlikely to explain the beneficial effect of aminoguanidine in ameliorating vascular barrier dysfunction during allograft rejection for the following reasons: (1) there is no evidence to suggest that advanced glycation end products are elevated in the allografts; (2) since diamine oxidase deaminates histamine, aminoguanidine would reduce histamine metabolism and thus possibly increase vascular leakiness by potentiating the effects of histamine, as we have reported previously45 ; and (3) we have demonstrated that aminoguanidine is a very poor inhibitor of purified recombinant aldose reductase.10 Thus, the beneficial effect of aminoguanidine in ameliorating vascular barrier dysfunction during allograft rejection is most likely mediated through inhibition of iNOS.

The reason for the organ-selective nature of vascular barrier dysfunction during allograft rejection is not clear from our data and may be related to the early time point in the rejection process and/or the specific methodology used to assess endothelial barrier function. Vascular dysfunction in the allograft group is likely to be multifactorial, because aminoguanidine reduced albumin permeation to isograft levels but not to control levels in the grafted heart and in some systemic tissues. Endothelial dysfunction in isograft tissues, which was not affected by aminoguanidine, and residual endothelial dysfunction in some aminoguanidine-treated allograft tissues are most likely caused by the transplantation procedure itself. Thus, our results indicate that organ harvest, preservation, and/or reimplantation increase vascular permeation in the isograft heart and some systemic tissues. Endothelial barrier dysfunction was further increased in the allograft heart and systemic vasculature by the rejection process through what appeared to be a NO-mediated mechanism. Increased vascular albumin permeation in the allograft heart and systemic vasculature and prevention of this endothelial dysfunction with aminoguanidine appeared to be independent of changes in systemic hemodynamic parameters and of changes in blood flow and vascular resistance in the affected tissues. This suggested that increased albumin permeation resulted from increased endothelial permeability to macromolecules.

Allograft Heart
Endothelial barrier dysfunction in the allograft heart was associated with increased tissue water content and with only mild histological changes of acute rejection. This is consistent with previous observations that early allograft rejection is associated with edema formation and compromised vascular barrier function, before significant myocyte necrosis.4 5 The early time point in the rejection process, together with the observation that aminoguanidine prevented endothelial dysfunction without altering the mild histological changes of acute rejection present on POD 4 (in contrast to attenuation of severe histological changes present on POD 823 ), suggested that endothelial barrier dysfunction was a specific effect of acute rejection and of NO. Increased vascular permeability in the allograft heart may result from several mechanisms, including (1) pathophysiological regulation of endothelial cell barrier integrity by NO,16 17 18 19 (2) NO-mediated endothelial cell cytotoxicity,46 which at this early point in the rejection process is not manifested histologically, and (3) increased synthesis of inflammatory prostaglandins47 48 or other mediators caused by NO. These results suggest that attenuation of allograft rejection previously demonstrated with inhibition of iNOS23 may be at least partially mediated through prevention of vascular barrier dysfunction in the allograft heart.

Expression of iNOS has recently been demonstrated in the allograft heart during chronic rejection.49 Modulation of the inflammatory response (with a diet deficient in essential fatty acids) resulted in a significant decrease in the degree of transplant arteriosclerosis and was correlated with decreased iNOS expression. Whether pharmacological inhibition of iNOS will attenuate transplant arteriosclerosis and whether NO-mediated vascular barrier dysfunction contributes to transplant arteriosclerosis during chronic rejection remain to be explored.

Allograft Systemic Vasculature
Since systemic endothelial dysfunction remote from localized inflammatory processes has not been previously reported to our knowledge, the observation that endothelial barrier function is compromised in the systemic vasculature during early allograft rejection is of particular interest. Also of note is that the increase in vascular permeation and tissue water content in the systemic tissues was of approximately the same magnitude as that in the rejecting heart. Our results suggest that allograft systemic vascular barrier dysfunction is mediated by iNOS mRNA expression and increased NO production in the affected systemic tissues. This is supported by our observations that (1) iNOS mRNA is present in the allograft native lung, associated with increased lung vascular permeability and water content, and (2) iNOS inhibition with aminoguanidine prevented allograft systemic vascular barrier dysfunction. Systemic iNOS expression may be induced by cytokines such as TNF-{alpha}, IL-1, and {gamma}-IFN, which are present during allograft rejection,27 have been detected in the systemic circulation during allograft rejection,28 29 and can induce iNOS expression in the endothelium.20 21 This mechanism is also supported by evidence that injection of low doses of TNF-{alpha} increased systemic albumin permeation without affecting tissue blood flow or hemodynamic parameters.50 Cytokine-induced systemic endothelial dysfunction is analogous to the systemic vascular leak syndrome accompanying IL-2 treatment for tumors,51 although the role of NO in this syndrome has not been evaluated.

Two other potential actions of NO may contribute to systemic vascular barrier dysfunction and cannot be discounted by our data. First, NO produced in the graft may circulate and act systemically. This seems unlikely given the short half-life of NO. However, several groups have postulated that NO-like activity may be stabilized in vivo.30 31 32 33 52 53 Recent reports demonstrate that NO can react with sulfhydryl groups of plasma proteins to form biologically active NO adducts with half-lives significantly longer than that of NO itself.30 31 32 33 Large amounts of NO are produced during allograft rejection as manifested by elevated serum nitrite/nitrate levels and by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopic analysis of the grafted heart23 54 and of allograft erythrocytes in the systemic circulation.54 Thus, NO produced in the allograft heart may form NO adducts, which then circulate and act systemically. Second, inhibition of NO production in the graft may prevent elaboration of other vasoactive mediators that act systemically. Production and release of these other mediators could be specifically dependent on NO production (eg, leukotrienes or prostaglandins47 48 ) or may be nonspecifically blocked by the iNOS inhibition attenuating myocyte damage (eg, release of ANF). This seems unlikely for the following reasons: (1) injection of leukotriene-B4, prostaglandin-E2, or ANF did not affect albumin permeation in brain or sciatic nerve,55 56 which were both profoundly affected by the rejection process in the present report; (2) in contrast to acute rejection, ANF produced changes in tissue blood flow and vascular resistance56 ; and (3) aminoguanidine did not alter the histological changes of acute rejection in the present study.

Allograft Blood-Brain Barrier
Perhaps the most significant finding of the present study is that allograft rejection increased vascular permeability in the brain by fourfold compared with control values. Brain microvascular endothelial cells and surrounding astrocytes form a very tight barrier to permeation by macromolecules. Permeability of this BBB is increased by intrinsic central nervous system processes such as meningitis7 57 58 and focal cerebral ischemia.59 However, the effect of systemic processes on BBB function is not well described. Our previous studies have demonstrated that albumin permeation in the brain is not affected during diabetes9 10 36 37 38 or by systemic administration of histamine,45 leukotriene-B4,55 prostaglandin-E2,55 or ANF.56 Others have demonstrated that bilateral adrenalectomy increases BBB permeability to albumin by up to 1.4-fold,60 suggesting that corticosteroids help maintain BBB integrity and adding significance to the present study reporting a fourfold elevation in BBB permeability to albumin during acute allograft rejection. To our knowledge, the present report is the first to demonstrate that (1) allograft rejection is associated with compromised BBB integrity and (2) a selective inhibitor of iNOS attenuates this BBB dysfunction.

Our observation that iNOS inhibition significantly attenuated BBB dysfunction during allograft rejection is perhaps not surprising given that (1) NO or NO donors activate soluble guanylate cyclase in brain endothelial cells and thus increase the formation of cGMP,61 (2) cGMP increases BBB permeability to macromolecules,62 (3) NOS inhibitors attenuate increased BBB permeability during focal cerebral ischemia,63 and (4) aminoguanidine attenuates BBB dysfunction in experimental endotoxin-induced meningitis.7 The exact mechanism causing impaired BBB function during allograft rejection has implications beyond the field of transplantation, including intrinsic neuropathophysiology, brain function during systemic pathophysiological processes, and drug delivery into the central nervous system.

Modulation of Vascular Permeability by NO
NO has diverse effects on the endothelium. Our results demonstrate that during acute allograft rejection, inhibition of iNOS prevents increased vascular permeability. NOS inhibitors also prevented or attenuated increased vascular permeation by macromolecules during endotoxin-induced uveitis6 and meningitis,7 in solid neoplasms,8 in diabetic animals,9 10 in response to increased blood flow,11 and in response to various agonists.12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 These studies are similar in that they examined increased vascular permeation caused by agonists or during pathological conditions. Conversely, inhibition of basal NO production increased vascular permeation in endothelial monolayers,64 feline small intestine,65 rat mesenteric venules,66 and rat coronary circulation.67 Increased vascular permeation seen with inhibition of basal NO production may reflect increased leukocyte adherence and endothelial activation, given that (1) impairment of constitutive NO production promoted leukocyte adherence and emigration68 69 and (2) antibodies to adhesion molecules prevented increased vascular permeation caused by NOS inhibitors.65 Conversely, inhibition of iNOS reduced cellular infiltrate in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,41 in endotoxin-induced uveitis,6 and in the latter stages of allograft rejection.23 These diverse effects of NO on the endothelium may be partially explained by NO serving to maintain endothelial integrity under physiological conditions, whereas pathophysiological production of larger amounts of NO increases endothelial permeability.

Conclusions
Early allograft rejection increased vascular albumin permeation and tissue water content in both the grafted heart and the systemic vasculature (particularly in the brain). In the absence of changes in regional blood flow or hemodynamic parameters, the increased albumin permeation is indicative of increased endothelial permeability. Allograft vascular barrier dysfunction was associated with iNOS mRNA expression in the affected tissues and with elevated serum nitrite/nitrate levels. Inhibition of iNOS with aminoguanidine prevented or significantly attenuated endothelial barrier dysfunction in the allograft heart and systemic vasculature and reduced allograft serum nitrite/nitrate levels to isograft values. These data indicate that NO contributes to compromised vascular barrier function in both the allograft heart and the systemic vasculature during early allograft rejection. Inhibition of NO production may provide a novel therapeutic modality in the management of acute allograft rejection and other immune-mediated processes and may attenuate systemic sequelae of these processes.


*    Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms
 
{gamma}-IFN = interferon gamma
ANF = atrial natriuretic factor
BBB = blood-brain barrier
BP = blood pressure
ecNOS = endothelial constitutive NOS
IL = interleukin
iNOS = inducible NOS
L-NMMA = NG-monomethyl-L-arginine
NOS = NO synthase
POD = postoperative day
TNF = tumor necrosis factor


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants F32 HL-09021 (Dr Worrall), EY0660 and HL-39934 (Dr Williamson), and R29 HL-46387 (Dr Ferguson); the Kilo Diabetes and Vascular Research Foundation (Dr Williamson); and the Monsanto-Searle/Washington University Biomedical Program (Drs Williamson and Ferguson). We would like to thank Dr Richard B. Schuessler for help with the statistical analysis.


*    Footnotes
 
Reprint requests to T. Bruce Ferguson, Jr, MD, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Suite 3108, Queeny Tower, One Barnes Hospital Plaza, St Louis, MO 63110.

Received June 23, 1995; accepted January 16, 1996.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Pober JS, Cotran RS. The role of endothelial cells in inflammation. Transplantation. 1990;50:537-544. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Granger DN, Kubes P. The microcirculation and inflammation: modulation of leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesion. J Leukoc Biol. 1994;55:662-675. [Abstract]

3. Heemann UW, Tullius SG, Azuma H, Kupiec-Weglinsky J, Tilney NL. Adhesion molecules and transplantation. Ann Surg. 1994;219:4-12. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Billingham ME. Diagnosis of cardiac rejection by endomyocardial biopsy. Heart Transplant. 1981;1:25-30.

5. Forbes RDC, Guttmann RD, Gomersall M, Hibberd J. A controlled serial ultrastructural tracer study of first-set cardiac allograft rejection in the rat. Am J Pathol. 1983;111:184-196. [Abstract]

6. Tilton RG, Chang K, Corbett JA, Misko TP, Currie MG, Bora NS, Kaplan HJ, Williamson JR. Endotoxin-induced uveitis in the rat is attenuated by inhibition of nitric oxide production. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:3278-3288. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Boje KMK. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthase partially attenuates alterations in the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier during experimental meningitis in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol. 1995;272:297-300. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Maeda H, Noguchi Y, Sato K, Akaike T. Enhanced vascular permeability in solid tumor is mediated by nitric oxide and inhibited by both new nitric oxide scavenger and nitric oxide synthase inhibitor. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1994;85:331-334. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Corbett JA, Tilton RG, Chang K, Hasan KS, Ido Y, Wang JL, Sweetland MA, Lancaster JR Jr, Williamson JR, McDaniel ML. Aminoguanidine, a novel inhibitor of nitric oxide formation, prevents diabetic vascular dysfunction. Diabetes. 1992;41:552-556. [Abstract]

10. Tilton RG, Chang K, Hasan KS, Smith SR, Petrash JM, Misko TP, Moore WM, Currie MG, Corbett JA, McDaniel ML, Williamson JR. Prevention of diabetic vascular dysfunction by guanidines: inhibition of nitric oxide synthase versus advanced glycation end-product formation. Diabetes. 1993;42:221-232. [Abstract]

11. Yuan Y, Granger HJ, Zawieja DC, Chilian WM. Flow modulates coronary venular permeability by a nitric oxide-related mechanism. Am J Physiol. 1992;263:H641-H646. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Boughton-Smith NK, Evans SM, Laszlo F, Whittle BJR, Moncada S. The induction of nitric oxide synthase and intestinal vascular permeability by endotoxin in the rat. Br J Pharmacol. 1993;110:1189-1195. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Lopez-Belmonte J, Whittle BJR. The involvement of endothelial dysfunction, nitric oxide and prostanoids in the rat gastric microcirculatory response to endothelin-1. Br J Pharmacol. 1994;112:267-271. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Hughes SR, Williams TJ, Brain SD. Evidence that endogenous nitric oxide modulates oedema formation induced by substance P. Eur J Pharmacol. 1990;191:481-484. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Ialenti A, Ianaro A, Moncada S, Di Rosa M. Modulation of acute inflammation by endogenous nitric oxide. Eur J Pharmacol. 1992;211:177-182. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Mayhan WG. Role of nitric oxide in leukotriene C4-induced increases in microvascular transport. Am J Physiol. 1993;265:H409-H414. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Yuan Y, Granger HJ, Zawieja DC, DeFily DV, Chilian WM. Histamine increases venular permeability via a phospholipase C-NO synthase-guanylate cyclase cascade. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:H1734-H1739. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Mayhan WG. Nitric oxide accounts for histamine-induced increases in macromolecular extravasation. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:H2369-H2373. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Mayhan WG. Role of nitric oxide in modulating permeability of hamster cheek pouch in response to adenosine 5'-diphosphate and bradykinin. Inflammation. 1992;16:295-305. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Moncada S, Palmer RMJ, Higgs EA. Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev. 1991;43:109-142. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Nathan C. Nitric oxide as a secretory product of mammalian cells. FASEB J. 1992;6:3051-3064. [Abstract]

22. Yang X, Chowdhury N, Cai B, Brett J, Marboe C, Sciacca RR, Michler RE, Cannon PJ. Induction of myocardial nitric oxide synthase by cardiac allograft rejection. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:714-721.

23. Worrall NK, Lazenby WD, Misko TP, Lin T-S, Rodi CP, Manning PT, Tilton RG, Williamson JR, Ferguson TB Jr. Modulation of in vivo alloreactivity by inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase. J Exp Med. 1995;181:63-70. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Misko TP, Moore WM, Kasten TP, Nickols GA, Corbett JA, Tilton RG, McDaniel ML, Williamson JR, Currie MG. Selective inhibition of the inducible nitric oxide synthase by aminoguanidine. Eur J Pharmacol. 1993;233:119-125. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Griffiths MJD, Messent M, MacAllister RJ, Evans TW. Aminoguanidine selectively inhibits inducible nitric oxide synthase. Br J Pharmacol. 1993;110:963-968. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Wolff DJ, Lubeskie A. Aminoguanidine is an isoform-selective, mechanism-based inactivator of nitric oxide synthase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1995;316:290-301. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Wu CJ, Lovett M, Wong-Lee J, Moeller F, Kitamura M, Goralski TJ, Billingham ME, Starnes VA, Clayberger C. Cytokine gene expression in rejecting cardiac allografts. Transplantation. 1992;54:326-332. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Maury CPJ, Teppo A-M. Raised levels of cachectin/tumor necrosis factor {alpha} in renal allograft rejection. J Exp Med. 1987;166:1132-1137. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Imagawa DK, Millis JM, Olthoff KM, Derus LJ, Chia D, Sugich LR, Ozawa M, Dempsey RA, Iwaki Y, Levy PJ, Terasaki PI, Busuttil RW. The role of tumor necrosis factor in allograft rejection, I: evidence that elevated levels of tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} predict rejection following orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplantation. 1990;50:219-225. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Slivka A, Chuttani R, Carr-Locke DL, Kobzik L, Bredt DS, Loscalzo J, Stamler JS. Inhibition of sphincter of Oddi function by the nitric oxide carrier S-nitroso-N-acetylcysteine in rabbits and humans. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:1792-1798.

31. Stamler JS, Jaraki O, Osborne J, Simon DI, Keaney J, Vita J, Singel D, Valeri CR, Loscalzo J. Nitric oxide circulates in mammalian plasma primarily as an S-nitroso adduct of serum albumin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:7674-7677. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Keaney JF, Simon DI, Stamler JS, Jaraki O, Scharfstein J, Vita JA, Loscalzo J. NO forms an adduct with serum albumin that has endothelium-derived relaxing factor-like properties. J Clin Invest. 1993;91:1582-1589.

33. Scharfstein JS, Keaney JF Jr, Slivka A, Welch GN, Vita JA, Stamler JS, Loscalzo J. In vivo transfer of nitric oxide between a plasma protein-bound reservoir and low molecular weight thiols. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:1432-1439.

34. Ono K, Lindsey ES. Improved technique of heart transplantation in rats. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1969;57:225-229. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Pugliese G, Tilton RG, Chang K, Speedy A, Province M, Eades DM, Lacy PE, Kilo C, Williamson JR. Effects of islet isografts on hemodynamic and vascular filtration changes in diabetic rats. Diabetes. 1990;39:323-332. [Abstract]

36. Pugliese G, Tilton RG, Speedy A, Santarelli E, Eades DM, Province MA, Kilo C, Sherman WR, Williamson JR. Modulation of hemodynamic and vascular filtration changes in diabetic rats by dietary myo-inositol. Diabetes. 1990;39:312-322. [Abstract]

37. Haraldsson B, Regner L, Hultborn R, Weiss L, Rippe B. Transcapillary passage of albumin in mammary tumours and in normal lactating mammary glands of the rat. Acta Physiol Scand. 1984;122:497-505. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Tilton RG, Chang K, Pugliese G, Eades DM, Province MA, Sherman WR, Kilo C, Williamson JR. Prevention of hemodynamic and vascular albumin filtration changes in diabetic rats by aldose reductase inhibitors. Diabetes. 1989;38:1258-1270. [Abstract]

39. Misko TP, Schilling RJ, Salvemini D, Moore WM, Currie MG. A fluorometric assay for the measurement of nitrite in biological samples. Anal Biochem. 1993;214:11-16. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem. 1987;162:156-159. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Cross AH, Misko TP, Lin RF, Hickey WF, Trotter JL, Tilton RG. Aminoguanidine, an inhibitor of inducible nitric oxide synthase, ameliorates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in SJL mice. J Clin Invest. 1994;93:2684-2690.

42. Brownlee M, Vlassara H, Kooney A, Ulrich P, Cerami A. Aminoguanidine prevents diabetes-induced arterial wall protein cross-linking. Science. 1986;232:1629-1632. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Hui JY, Taylor SL. Inhibition of in vivo histamine metabolism in rats by foodborne and pharmacologic inhibitors of diamine oxidase, histamine N-methyltransferase, and monoamine oxidase. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1985;81:241-249. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Kumari K, Umar S, Bansal V, Sahib MK. Inhibition of diabetes-associated complications by nucleophilic compounds. Diabetes. 1991;40:1079-1084. [Abstract]

45. Kilzer P, Chang K, Marvel J, Kilo C, Williamson JR. Tissue differences in vascular permeability changes induced by histamine. Microvasc Res. 1985;30:270-285. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

46. Palmer RMJ, Bridge L, Foxwell NA, Moncada S. The role of nitric oxide in endothelial cell damage and its inhibition by glucocorticoids. Br J Pharmacol. 1992;105:11-12. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

47. Salvemini D, Misko TP, Masferrer JL, Seibert K, Currie MG, Needleman P. Nitric oxide activates cyclooxygenase enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:7240-7244. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Corbett JA, Kwon G, Turk J, McDaniel ML. IL-1 beta induces co-expression of both nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase by islets of Langerhans: activation of cyclooxygenase by nitric oxide. Biochemistry. 1993;32:13767-13770. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

49. Russell ME, Wallace AF, Wyner LR, Newell JB, Karnovsky MJ. Upregulation and modulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase in rat cardiac allografts with chronic rejection and transplant arteriosclerosis. Circulation. 1995;92:457-464. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

50. Worrall N, Chang K, Misko T, Allison W, Williamson JR, Ferguson TB Jr. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) causes systemic endothelial dysfunction. FASEB J. 1995;9:A960. Abstract.

51. Rosenstein M, Ettinghausen SE, Rosenberg SA. Extravasation of intravascular fluid mediated by the systemic administration of recombinant interleukin-2. J Immunol. 1986;137:1735-1742. [Abstract]

52. Ignarro LJ, Lippton H, Edwards JC. Mechanism of vascular smooth muscle relaxation by organic nitrates, nitrites, nitroprusside and nitric oxide: evidence for the involvement of S-nitrosothiols as active intermediates. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1981;218:739-749. [Free Full Text]

53. Myers PR, Minor RL, Guerra R, Bates JN, Harrison DG. Vasorelaxant properties of the endothelium-derived relaxing factor more closely resemble S-nitrosocysteine than nitric oxide. Nature. 1990;345:161-163. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

54. Lancaster JR Jr, Langrehr JM, Bergonia HA, Murase N, Simmons RL, Hoffman RA. EPR detection of heme and nonheme iron-containing protein nitrosylation by nitric oxide during rejection of rat heart allograft. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:10994-10998. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

55. Stenson WF, Chang K, Williamson JR. Tissue differences in vascular permeability induced by leukotriene B4 and prostaglandin E2 in the rat. Prostaglandins. 1986;32:5-17. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

56. Williamson JR, Holmberg SW, Chang K, Marvel J, Sutera SP, Needleman P. Mechanisms underlying atriopeptin-induced increases in hematocrit and vascular permeation in rats. Circ Res. 1989;64:890-899. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

57. Ramilo O, Sáez-Llorens X, Mertsola J, Jafari H, Olsen KD, Hansen EJ, Yoshinaga M, Ohkawara S, Nariuchi H, McCracken GH Jr. Tumor necrosis factor {alpha}/cachectin and interleukin-1ß initiate meningeal inflammation. J Exp Med. 1990;172:497-507. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

58. Quagliarello VJ, Wispelwey B, Long WJ Jr, Scheld WM. Recombinant human interleukin-1 induces meningitis and blood-brain barrier injury in the rat: characterization and comparison with tumor necrosis factor. J Clin Invest. 1991;87:1360-1366.

59. Anwar M, Costa O, Sinha AK, Weiss HR. Middle cerebral artery occlusion increases cerebral capillary permeability. Neurol Res. 1993;15:232-236. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

60. Long JB, Holaday JW. Blood-brain barrier: endogenous modulation by adrenal-cortical function. Science. 1985;227:1580-1583. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

61. Marsault R, Frelin C. The activation by nitric oxide of guanylate cyclase in endothelial cells from brain capillaries. J Neurochem. 1992;59:942-945. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

62. Joó F, Temesvári P, Dux E. Regulation of the macromolecular transport in the brain microvessels: the role of cyclic GMP. Brain Res. 1983;278:165-174. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

63. Chi OZ, Wei HM, Sinha AK, Weiss HR. Effects of inhibition of nitric oxide synthase on blood-brain barrier transport in focal cerebral ischemia. Pharmacology. 1994;48:367-373. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

64. Oliver JA. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor contributes to the regulation of endothelial permeability. J Cell Physiol. 1992;151:506-511. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

65. Kubes P, Granger DN. Nitric oxide modulates microvascular permeability. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:H611-H615. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

66. Kurose I, Kubes P, Wolf R, Anderson DC, Paulson J, Miyasaka M, Granger DN. Inhibition of nitric oxide production: mechanisms of vascular albumin leakage. Circ Res. 1993;73:164-171. [Abstract]

67. Filep JG, Földes-Filep E, Sirois P. Nitric oxide modulates vascular permeability in the rat coronary circulation. Br J Pharmacol. 1993;108:323-326. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

68. Kubes P, Suzuki M, Granger DN. Nitric oxide: an endogenous modulator of leukocyte adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:4651-4655. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

69. Suematsu M, Tamatani T, Delano FA, Miyasaka M, Forrest M, Suzuki H, Schmid-Schönbein GW. Microvascular oxidative stress preceding leukocyte activation elicited by in vivo nitric oxide suppression. Am J Physiol. 1994;266:H2410-H2415.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
A. Koch, A. Burgschweiger, E. Herpel, F.-U. Sack, P. Schirmacher, G. B. Szabo, M. Karck, and P. A. Schnabel
Inducible NO synthase expression in endomyocardial biopsies after heart transplantation in relation to the postoperative course
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2007; 32(4): 639 - 643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
G. M. Pieper, V. Nilakantan, G. Hilton, X. Zhou, A. K. Khanna, N. L. N. Halligan, C. C. Felix, B. Kampalath, O. W. Griffith, M. A. Hayward, et al.
Variable efficacy of N6-(1-iminoethyl)-L-lysine in acute cardiac transplant rejection
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, February 1, 2004; 286(2): H525 - H534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
A.G.N. Agusti, A. Noguera, J. Sauleda, E. Sala, J. Pons, and X. Busquets
Systemic effects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2003; 21(2): 347 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
S. M. Wildhirt, M. Weis, C. Schulze, N. Conrad, S. Pehlivanli, G. Rieder, G. Enders, W. von Scheidt, and B. Reichart
Coronary flow reserve and nitric oxide synthases after cardiac transplantation in humans
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2001; 19(6): 840 - 847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. F. Soto, C.-X. Jia, D. G. Rabkin, J. P. Hart, Y. M. Carter, M. J. Sardo, D. T. Hsu, P. E. Fisher, D. J. Pinsky, and H. M. Spotnitz
Improvement of rejection-induced diastolic abnormalities in rat cardiac allografts with inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibition
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2000; 120(1): 39 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. L. Skarsgard, X. Wang, P. McDonald, A. H. Lui, E. K. Lam, B. M. McManus, C. van Breemen, and I. Laher
Profound Inhibition of Myogenic Tone in Rat Cardiac Allografts Is Due to eNOS- and iNOS-Based Nitric Oxide and an Intrinsic Defect in Vascular Smooth Muscle Contraction
Circulation, March 21, 2000; 101(11): 1303 - 1310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
L. P. Perrault, F. Mahlberg, C. Breugnot, J.-P. Bidouard, N. Villeneuve, J.-P. Vilaine, and P. M. Vanhoutte
Hypercholesterolemia Increases Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction, Lipid Content, and Accelerated Atherosclerosis After Heart Transplantation
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, March 1, 2000; 20(3): 728 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
A. M Shah
Inducible nitric oxide synthase and cardiovascular disease
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2000; 45(1): 148 - 155.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
S. M. Wildhirt, S. Weismueller, C. Schulze, N. Conrad, A. Kornberg, and B. Reichart
Inducible nitric oxide synthase activation after ischemia/reperfusion contributes to myocardial dysfunction and extent of infarct size in rabbits: evidence for a late phase of nitric oxide-mediated reperfusion injury
Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 1999; 43(3): 698 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. K. Worrall, T. P. Misko, M. D. Botney, P. M. Sullivan, J.-J Hui, G. M. Suau, P. T. Manning, and T. B. Ferguson Jr
Time course and cellular localization of inducible nitric oxide synthases expression during cardiac allograft rejection
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1999; 67(3): 716 - 722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. E. SILKOFF, M. CARAMORI, L. TREMBLAY, P. MCCLEAN, C. CHAPARRO, S. KESTEN, M. HUTCHEON, A. S. SLUTSKY, N. ZAMEL, and S. KESHAVJEE
Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Human Lung Transplantation . A Noninvasive Marker of Acute Rejection
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 1998; 157(6): 1822 - 1828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
N. K. Worrall, K. Chang, W. S. Lejeune, T. P. Misko, P. M. Sullivan, T. B. Ferguson Jr., and J. R. Williamson
TNF-alpha causes reversible in vivo systemic vascular barrier dysfunction via NO-dependent and -independent mechanisms
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 1997; 273(6): H2565 - H2574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
Y.-T. LU, S. F. LIU, J. A. MITCHELL, A. B. MALIK, P. G. HELLEWELL, and T. W. EVANS
The Role of Endogenous Nitric Oxide in Modulating Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in the Isolated, Blood-perfused Rat Lung
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 1997; 157(1): 273 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
S. Hirono, M. O. Islam, M. Nakazawa, Y. Yoshida, M. Kodama, A. Shibata, T. Izumi, and S. Imai
Expression of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase in Rat Experimental Autoimmune Myocarditis With Special Reference to Changes in Cardiac Hemodynamics
Circ. Res., January 1, 1997; 80(1): 11 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
R. A. Kelly, J.-L. Balligand, and T. W. Smith
Nitric Oxide and Cardiac Function
Circ. Res., September 1, 1996; 79(3): 363 - 380.
[Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. K. Worrall, T. P. Misko, P. M. Sullivan, J.-J. Hui, and T. B. Ferguson Jr
Inhibition of Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Attenuates Established Acute Cardiac Allograft Rejection
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1996; 62(2): 378 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Worrall, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Worrall, N. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, T. B., Jr