© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Identification of Receptor Binding and Activation Sites in Endothelin-1 by Use of Site-Directed Mutagenesis
From the Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (A.E., D.P.) and Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy (R.L.T.), University of Georgia, Athens, and the Departments of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and the Reproductive Sciences and Endocrinology Laboratories (A.E., D.P.), University of Miami (Fla) School of Medicine.
Correspondence to Dr David Puett, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.E-mail puett@bchiris.biochem.uga.edu.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Abstract This study addresses the structural requirements for the intracellular processing and receptor binding properties of endothelin-1 (ET-1). Point mutants of preproendothelin-1 cDNA, with replacement of the codons for Lys9 of ET-1 by ones for Ala and Glu and of Ile20 and Trp21 by ones encoding Ala, were expressed in COS-7 cells. Competitive binding experiments on rat vascular smooth muscle cells (A-10), which were shown to be an ETA receptor–rich cell line, between [125I]ET-1 and synthetic ET-1, wild-type recombinant ET-1, and recombinant [Ala9]ET-1, [Glu9]ET-1, [Ala20]ET-1, and [Ala21]ET-1 yielded Ki values of 0.2±0.02, 0.2±0.02, 0.04±0.01, 1.4±0.2, 1.6±0.2, and >50 nmol/L, respectively. In similar experiments with ETB receptor–rich human Girardi heart cells, the corresponding values were 0.2±0.03, 0.2±0.03, 0.2±0.04, 0.2±0.06, 1.4±0.4, and >50 nmol/L. The ETA receptor–mediated contractile responses to [Glu9]ET-1 and [Ala20]ET-1, measured by using canine coronary artery rings, were decreased approximately fourfold to fivefold compared with the response produced by synthetic or wild-type recombinant ET-1, whereas [Ala9]ET-1 was found to be more potent, and [Ala21]ET-1 did not produce any contraction. These results demonstrate that Ile20 and Trp21 are involved in binding to both receptor subtypes. Of considerable interest was the observation that [Glu9]ET-1 also blunts the ETA receptor subtype–mediated contractile response to ET-1 stimulus.
Key Words: endothelin-1 • site-directed mutagenesis • receptor binding • receptor activation
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Endothelins (ETs) constitute a family of peptides that have very similar structures and also share sequence homology and bioactivity with sarafotoxins, found in the venom of Atractaspis engaddensis.1 2 ET-1, a peptide with very potent vasoconstrictor,3 bronchoconstrictor,4 and mitogenic5 6 7 effects, is biosynthesized as PPET-1, an inactive precursor that is a substrate for endoproteases and exoproteases.3 This 203-amino-acid residue protein is initially cleaved by dibasic-specific endopeptidases and a carboxypeptidase to yield an intermediate peptide, big ET-1, which is further processed to ET-1 by ECE. The mature peptide exerts its biological effects by binding to two G protein–coupled receptor subtypes that have been identified in higher animals. The ETA receptor has higher affinity for ET-1 and ET-2 than ET-3,8 whereas the ETB receptor binds all three isoforms and S6c with nearly equal affinity.9
Because of its constrictor and proliferative properties, ET-1 has been suggested to be involved in a variety of diseases, including atherosclerosis, renal failure, and hypertension.7 10 To better understand the role of ET-1 in these disease states and also to develop selective receptor antagonists, structure-function studies have been performed by using ET analogues and chemical and enzymatic modifications of ET-1. These studies have focused on three highly conserved regions of the molecule, including the two disulfide bonds, the cluster of charged residues (Asp8, Lys9, and Glu10), and the hydrophobic C-terminal region.
The presence of disulfide bonds is required for receptor binding and bioactivity mediated by the ETA receptor11 but not the ETB receptor12 subtype. The replacement of the charged groups of Asp8 and Glu10 by Asn and Gln, respectively, results in the complete loss of vasoconstrictor activity.11 Additionally, the vasoconstrictive response to Lys9-nicked ET-1, in which the peptide bond between Lys9 and Glu10 is cleaved, develops and decays much more rapidly.13 This observation suggests that the interaction between Lys9 and the surrounding charged residues is important in association and dissociation of ET-1 to and from the receptor.13 Furthermore, a change in the kinetics of receptor binding may be important in influencing biological activities. Since S6c, in which Lys9 is replaced by Glu, is an ETB-selective agonist, it was also proposed that variations in the net charge in the loop region of the molecule, ie, including Ser4 to Glu10, are important for receptor subtype specificity and affinity.14 Several groups also demonstrated that the C-terminal Trp is involved in receptor binding.13 15
These reports from different research groups involve either receptor binding experiments or contractility assays. However, a comprehensive study including both measurements under the same conditions has not been reported. Furthermore, these investigations were conducted only on vascular smooth muscle, where the ETA receptor subtype is predominant. Although it was demonstrated that the C-terminal fragment of ET-1 (residues 16 to 21) acts as an agonist in the guinea pig bronchus,16 which possesses predominantly ETB receptors, our knowledge of the contribution of the residues in this region on binding to ETB receptors and subsequent bioactivity is limited.
To develop a working model and investigate the contributions of the charge interactions in the loop region and of the hydrophobic residues in the C-terminal region of the peptide to the binding to both receptor subtypes and contractility mediated by the ETA receptor subtype, we substituted Lys9 with Ala and Glu and substituted Ile20 and Trp21 with Ala in the PPET-1 cDNA by using site-directed mutagenesis. This approach allowed us to study the contribution of these residues to the biosynthesis and posttranslational modifications of these peptides as well. The results of the present study demonstrate that Ile20 and Trp21 are important for binding to both receptor subtypes and that replacement of Lys9 by Glu yields a peptide that has partial agonist and inhibitory properties for the ETA receptor.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Materials
BQ-123, S6c, [Ala1,3,11,15]ET-1, big ET-1, and ET-1 synthetic peptides and RIA kits were obtained from Peninsula Laboratories, Inc. A Transformer Mutagenesis kit was purchased from Clontech. AimV serum-free medium was a product of GIBCO BRL. Transfectam and the pSVL expression vector were obtained from Promega and Pharmacia, respectively. The C-18 column (4.6x250 mm) and [125I]ET-1 (2200 Ci/mmol) were purchased from Alltech and New England Nuclear, respectively. The PPET-1 cDNA was kindly provided by Dr Carla Zoja, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Bergamo, Italy. The adult female dogs for the contractility studies were obtained from the Athens/Clarke County Humane Society (Ga).
Cell Culture
Rat vascular smooth muscle cells (A-10) and African green monkey
kidney epithelial cells (COS-7) were obtained from American Type
Culture Collection and maintained as recommended. Girardi heart cells
were kindly provided by Dr M. Fujimoto, Shionogi Research Laboratories,
Osaka, Japan, and maintained as described
previously.17 Briefly, all three cell lines were grown in
DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 50 U/mL penicillin, 50 µg/mL
streptomycin, and 125 ng/mL amphotericin B and maintained at 37°C
under an atmosphere of 5% CO2.
Preparation of Mutant cDNAs and Transient
Transfection
The pSVL–PPET-1 construct was used for site-directed
mutagenesis with the Transformer Mutagenesis kit, which allows the
introduction of specific base changes into double-stranded plasmid.
The primers were designed to replace the codons in the PPET-1 cDNA for
amino acid residues Lys9, Ile20,
or Trp21 by ones that encode Ala. Lys9 was also
replaced by an oppositely charged residue, Glu (Fig 1
). The primer sequences are as follows:
[Ala9]ET-1, CTG ATG GAT GCA GAG TGT GTC;
[Glu9]ET-1, CTG ATG GAT GAA GAG TGT GTC;
[Ala20]ET-1, CTG GAC ATC GCT TGG GTC AAC; and
[Ala21]ET-1, GAC ATC ATT GCG GTC AAC ACT. The
mutated plasmids were verified by sequencing and mutant clones were
termed [Ala9-ET-1]PPET-1,
[Glu9-ET-1]PPET-1,
[Ala20-ET-1]PPET-1, and
[Ala21-ET-1]PPET-1, respectively.
|
To express the recombinant proteins, COS-7 cells were seeded at a density of 3x106 cells per 175-cm2 flask the day before the transfection. The following day, the medium was aspirated, and the cells were washed with serum-free medium. Then, the expression vector carrying the mutant or the wild-type PPET-1 cDNAs was introduced by incubating cells with Transfectam for 4 hours at 37°C. After transfection, the cells were incubated in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum for 18 hours, and then the medium was replaced by AimV serum-free medium (50 mL per 175-cm2 flask). After 48 hours, the medium was collected and stored at -20°C for subsequent RIA. For HPLC analysis, samples of the expression medium were extracted by using Sep-Pak C18 cartridges. Briefly, 1 mL of medium was acidified with 1 mL of 4% acetic acid and then applied to a cartridge that had been sequentially pretreated with 5 mL each of 4% acetic acid in 86% ethanol, methanol, distilled water, and 4% acetic acid. The column was rinsed twice with 3 mL of water, and the sample was eluted with 3 mL of 4% acetic acid in 86% ethanol. The recovery of [125I]ET-1 was 80% with this procedure. The fractions were dried in a SpeedVac and reconstituted in 0.1% acetic acid in distilled water and analyzed by HPLC. Transfection experiments were performed at least six independent times.
RIA of ET-1 and Big ET-1
The concentrations of ir-ET-1 and ir-big ET-1 in the
transfection media were determined with RIA kits. The
cross-reactivity of the antibody used in the ET-1 RIA was stated to
be 35% with big ET-1 and 7% each with ET-2 and ET-3. The antibody
used in the big ET-1 RIA was claimed to be 100% specific for big ET-1
with no cross-reactivity with the ETs. The sensitivity of both
assays was 10 to 1280 pg/mL. The media collected from six independent
transfection experiments (n=6) were assayed in three separate RIA runs,
all performed in duplicate to obtain n=18 for statistical
analysis. The media were lyophilized and reconstituted in a
smaller volume to concentrate the samples for receptor binding
experiments and contractility assays as described
below. The different dilutions of the concentrated samples were also
analyzed by RIA to quantify the amount of ir-ET-1 and
ir-big ET-1. To ensure that the mutant ET-1s reacted with the
antibody in the ET-1 RIA as did wild-type and synthetic ET-1,
dilution curves were prepared, and log-logit plots were
analyzed. For these, eight concentrations of each recombinant
peptide were compared with those of synthetic ET-1 over the
concentration range of 10 to 1280 pg/mL.
HPLC Analysis
The transfection media were separated on a reverse-phase
column by using a Perkin-Elmer 1020 LC Plus system. After injection of
each sample (150 µL), the column was developed by using a gradient of
solvent A (water in 0.1% [vol/vol] trifluoroacetic acid) and solvent
B (100% acetonitrile in 0.1% [vol/vol] trifluoroacetic acid)
applied at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The discontinuous gradient was
established in six steps, half of which involved linear gradients, as
follows: step 1, 100% A for 5 minutes; step 2, 80% A and 20% B for 5
minutes; step 3, 50% A and 50% B for 60 minutes; step 4, 30% A and
70% B for 5 minutes; step 5, 30% A and 70% B for 5 minutes; and step
6, 100% A for 1 minute. Synthetic ET-1 and big ET-1 were
analyzed under the same conditions. The HPLC fractions (1 mL)
were collected, and 100 µL of each was assayed by RIA. HPLC
separation was performed at least twice by using transfection media
collected from two separate experiments.
Vascular Reactivity
Adult female dogs were euthanatized with sodium pentobarbital.
The hearts were excised and placed in chilled oxygenated
Krebs' buffer of the following composition (mmol/L): KCl 4.6,
CaCl2 2.5, KH2PO4 1.2, NaCl 118,
NaHCO3 2.5, and dextrose 11. The left anterior descending
coronary artery was carefully isolated, cut into 2- to 4-mm
rings, and mounted at the optimal diastolic tension (2 g)
in 5-mL tissue baths containing oxygenated Krebs' buffer
maintained at pH 7.4 and 37°C. Bath solutions were changed every 15
minutes. Isometric contractions were measured with a Grass model 7B
polygraph. The rings were allowed to equilibrate 1 hour and were then
sequentially exposed to 70 mmol/L KCl and 1 µmol/L acetylcholine and
washed. Contractile responses to the synthetic and recombinant peptides
in concentrations from 1 to 50 nmol/L were measured, and the tension
generated in these responses was expressed as the percentage of the
maximal KCl response. To further identify the receptor subtype
present on coronary artery rings, the dose-response
curves of synthetic ET-1 were repeated in the presence of 1 µmol/L
BQ-123, an ETA receptor antagonist.
Receptor Binding Experiments
A-10 cells were seeded in 12-well tissue culture plates at a
density of 2x105 cells per well the day before the
experiment. The next day, cells, almost 80% confluent, were rinsed
twice with cold HBSS supplemented with 0.1% BSA and incubated at room
temperature for 2 hours with 25 pmol/L [125I]ET-1 in the
presence of unlabeled ET-1, ET-3, and ETB receptor
subtype–selective agonists S6c, [Ala1,3,11,15]ET-1,
or ETA receptor antagonist BQ-123. To further
characterize the receptor subtypes, the total binding of
[125I]ET-1 was repeated in the presence of 1 µmol/L
BQ-123 or 0.1 µmol/L S6c to block ETA or ETB
receptors, respectively. The cells were washed twice with ice-cold
HBSS and solubilized in 1N NaOH, and cell-bound radioactivity was
measured. After the receptor subtype was identified, similar
experiments were performed by using transfection medium containing
various concentrations (5 pmol/L to 50 nmol/L) of either wild-type
ET-1, [Ala9]ET-1, [Glu9]ET-1,
[Ala20]ET-1 or [Ala21]ET-1
recombinant peptides or synthetic ET-1. The receptor binding
experiments with Girardi heart cells were performed in glass tubes,
because the cells detached from the tissue culture plates during the
incubation period. On the day of the experiment, cells were trypsinized
and aliquoted into the glass tubes at a density of 5x105
cells per tube. Binding was carried out as described above. Specific
binding was calculated as total binding minus nonspecific binding,
which was measured in the presence of excess unlabeled ET-1 (0.1
µmol/L). The binding experiments were repeated four times each in
duplicate, and the data were analyzed by
IN-PLOT (GraphPad Software).
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Expression of Recombinant Peptides
The wild-type and mutant cDNAs were transiently transfected into COS-7 cells, and the media collected 48 hours after transfection were assayed for ir-ET-1 and ir-big ET-1 by RIA. To test the sensitivity of the antibody for the recombinant wild-type and mutant peptides, dilution curves for each peptide were performed and compared with the standard curve for synthetic ET-1. The equivalent slopes of the log-logit plots for synthetic ET-1 and the recombinant peptides indicated that the antibody used in the RIA recognizes the mutant peptides as well as wild-type and synthetic ET-1 (Table 1
). On this assay, total
ir-ET-1 secreted into the medium collected from mock-transfected
cells and cells transfected with wild-type PPET-1,
[Ala9-ET-1]PPET-1, [Glu9-ET-1]PPET-1, and
[Ala20-ET-1]PPET-1 cDNAs were 50±30, 2704±104,
2870±372, 3206±246, and 3190±340 pg/mL, respectively, suggesting
that these mutations had no impact on biosynthesis and processing of
the mutant PPET-1s. The corresponding value in the medium obtained from
[Ala21-ET-1]PPET-1 cDNA–transfected cells,
however, was only 302±44 pg/mL (Fig 2).
We recently showed that there is a corresponding increase in the
ir-big ET-1 in the cell extracts obtained from cells transfected
with this mutant cDNA, suggesting that this residue is involved in the
processing and secretion of [Ala21]ET-1 and that
the metabolism of this mutant does not differ from that of
wild-type ET-1.18
|
|
ir-ET-1 in the transfection media was further characterized by
HPLC coupled to RIA (Fig 3). In the
medium obtained from cells transfected with wild-type PPET-1 cDNA,
a major peak coeluted with standard ET-1 at fraction 47, and a minor
peak coeluted with standard big ET-1 at fraction 37 (Fig 3A). As shown in Fig. 3B [Ala9]ET-1 and
[Glu9]ET-1 eluted at fraction 46, and the corresponding
big ET-1 mutants were detected in fraction 36. For the
[Ala20]ET-1 and [Ala21]ET-1
recombinant peptides, the major peak was located at fraction 45, and
the minor peak was located at fraction 34 (Fig 3C). The
differences in the elution profiles of the mutant peptides are
attributable to the replacements made.
|
Characterization of ET Receptor Subtypes on A-10 Cells and Girardi
Heart Cells
The presence of ETA and ETB receptors on
A-10 cells and Girardi heart cells, respectively, was confirmed by
competitive binding experiments between [125I]ET-1 and
unlabeled ET-1, ET-3, the ETA receptor
antagonist BQ-123, and ETB receptor
subtype–selective agonists S6c and
[Ala1,3,11,15]ET-1. The rank order of the
Ki values for ET-1 (0.13 nmol/L), BQ-123 (1
nmol/L), [Ala1,3,11,15]ET-1 (125 nmol/L), ET-3 (500
nmol/L), and S6c (520 nmol/L) demonstrated the presence of a typical
ETA receptor subtype (Fig 4A). Although the competition curve with
BQ-123 suggested that there might be two classes of binding sites, the
analysis of the data from binding experiments with all the
unlabeled ligands resulted in a best fit for one class of binding
sites. In addition, 1 µmol/L BQ-123 totally blocked the binding of
[125I]ET-1, and Northern analysis of mRNA
obtained from A-10 cells showed the presence of only one band
corresponding to the ETA receptor subtype (data not shown),
providing further evidence that only one type of receptor
(ETA) is present in this cell line. Similar experiments
were performed on Girardi heart cells, and all peptides displaced
[125I]ET-1 in a monophasic manner with
Ki values of 0.14, 0.2, 0.2, and >900 nmol/L
for ET-1, ET-3, [Ala1,3,11,15]ET-1, and BQ-123,
respectively (Fig 4B). These results indicated that
this cell line possesses mainly ETB receptors, confirming
the results of others.17 Moreover, the addition of 1
µmol/L BQ-123 had no effect on total binding, whereas 0.1 µmol/L
S6c totally blocked the binding of [125I]ET-1.
|
Receptor Binding Properties of the Mutant ETs
The concentrations of the recombinant mutant and
wild-type ETs in the transfection media ranged between 0.1 and 0.7
nmol/L. To obtain reasonable dose-response curves with the two
different cell lines, the transfection media were lyophilized and
resuspended in a smaller volume. The concentrated samples were then
assayed by RIA. The highest concentration in all the samples was
determined to be 
50 nmol/L. Then, serial dilutions were prepared
between 5 pmol/L and 50 nmol/L. The media were used directly in the
competitive binding experiments with A-10 and Girardi heart cells,
which are enriched in ETA and ETB receptor
subtypes, respectively. The medium obtained from mock-transfected
cells did not displace any of the [125I]ET-1 bound to
both cell types.
As shown in Fig 5A, binding of recombinant ET-1
(Ki, 0.2 nmol/L) to A-10 cells was
identical to that of synthetic ET-1 (Ki,
0.2 nmol/L). All of the mutants displayed a different competition
curve. When Lys9 was replaced with Ala, the competition
curve shifted to the left (Ki, 0.04
nmol/L), suggesting that the [Ala9]ET-1 mutant has a
higher affinity for ETA receptors. When the same residue
was replaced by Glu, the binding decreased, as evidenced by an
increased Ki value of 1.4 nmol/L.
[Ala20]ET-1 also exhibited decreased binding with
a Ki of 1.6 nmol/L. In contrast,
[Ala21]ET-1 exhibited very little binding and
displaced only 15% of the radiolabeled ET-1.
|
The recombinant mutant peptides exhibited different binding
curves to Girardi heart cells relative to A-10 cells (Fig 5B
). Replacement of Lys9 with Ala or Glu
had no measurable effect on binding. These mutant peptides displaced
labeled ET-1 in a manner similar to synthetic ET-1 and recombinant
ET-1. The competition curve with [Ala20]ET-1 was
shifted to the right with a Ki value of 1.4
nmol/L. The [Ala21]ET-1 mutant was again
characterized by very weak binding and displaced only 18% of the
radiolabel. The binding data obtained from both cell lines are
summarized in Table 2.
|
Effects of Synthetic and Recombinant ETs on Canine Coronary
Artery Contraction
When synthetic ET-1 was tested on canine coronary artery
rings, which are reported to be rich in ETA receptors, a
sharp dose-response curve, starting at 1 nmol/L and reaching 80%
of the maximum at 10 nmol/L, was produced (Fig 6). Recombinant ET-1 and synthetic ET-1
produced similar contractions, and [Ala9]ET-1 was found
to be even more potent, which is consistent with the binding
studies. Interestingly, replacement of Lys9 by Glu caused a
dramatic decrease in the contractile response. Only 21%
contractility was observed at the highest
concentration used (50 nmol/L). The
[Ala20]ET-1 mutant peptide gave similar
results (ie, only 23% contractility was obtained),
whereas [Ala21]ET-1 failed to induce any
contraction at all. The EC50 values for each mutant peptide
are given in Table 2. The control medium of the mock-transfected
cells did not cause any contraction, nor did it interfere with the
contractility of synthetic ET-1. Since big ET-1 is
100-fold less potent than ET-1 and since the amount of big ET-1, even
in the concentrated media, was always <10 nmol/L, it was concluded
that the contractile response was mediated by recombinant ET-1
present in the tranfection media. This result was further supported
by the finding that ETA-specific antagonist
BQ-123 blocked the contractile response to recombinant wild-type
ET-1 (data not shown).
|
To confirm the presence of ETA receptors on
coronary artery rings, contractility studies
were performed with the ETA receptor antagonist
BQ-123. As shown in Fig 7B, 1 µmol/L BQ-123, when
added in combination with various concentrations of recombinant ET-1
(7.5 to 50 nmol/L), totally blocked the contractile response. Similar
results were obtained when the coronary artery rings were
pretreated with 1 µmol/L BQ-123 (data not shown). Moreover, 1
µmol/L BQ-123 completely antagonized the contractile response induced
by 50 nmol/L ET-1 (Fig 7C). These results are
consistent with canine coronary arteries containing
mainly ETA receptors.
|
To determine whether the weak agonists [Glu9]ET-1 and
[Ala20]ET-1 have any antagonist
properties, the contractile response to ET-1 was tested on
coronary artery rings preconstricted with 50 nmol/L of these
mutant peptides. As shown in Fig 8, the addition of 10
nmol/L ET-1 to the rings pretreated with
[Ala20]ET-1 caused a 100% contractile response
similar to that obtained with 10 nmol/L ET-1 on untreated rings.
However, when similar experiments were performed on
[Glu9]ET-1–pretreated rings, only a 35% increase in the
response, reaching a maximum of just 56% relative to 70 mmol/L KCl,
was observed. This finding suggests that [Glu9]ET-1 binds
to the receptor, causing 21% contractility, and the
addition of 10 to 50 nmol/L ET-1 cannot displace this mutant peptide
completely, resulting in only a 56% contractile response.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
In the present study, we have obtained full-length analogues of ET-1, containing single amino acid residue replacements at positions 9, 20, and 21, by using site-directed mutagenesis and a mammalian expression system. This approach rather than the use of synthetic peptides enabled us to study the contribution of certain amino acid residues to the biosynthesis and processing of ET-1 as well as to the receptor binding and bioactivity. With the exception of the [Ala21]ET-1 mutant, the mutations introduced had no apparent effect on the synthesis and posttranslational modifications of the peptides. The results of the binding and contractility experiments with these mutant recombinant peptides have demonstrated that all three residues are involved in the binding and activation of ETA receptors. The substitutions we made at position 9 did not affect the binding to the ETB receptor subtype. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the single amino acid replacements in full-length ET-1 on binding to ETB receptors.
Structure-function studies have revealed that the charged portion
of the loop region,
Asp8-Lys9-Glu10, is crucial
for vasoconstrictor activity mediated by ETA
receptors.11 For example, the replacement of
Asp8 by Asn and of Glu10 by Gln resulted in a
total loss of activity.11 To determine the effect of a
charge change at position 9, we replaced the codon for the positively
charged Lys by one that encodes a neutral amino acid residue, Ala, and
also an oppositely charged residue, Glu. The results of the binding and
contractility experiments involving ETA
receptors with [Ala9]ET-1 are in good agreement with the
report on Ala screening using synthetic peptides of
ET-1.19 The replacement of Lys9 by Ala yields
a peptide that has an approximately fivefold higher affinity for the
ETA receptor. The effect of this substitution was also
tested on binding to Girardi heart cells, which have only
ETB receptors. This mutant peptide exhibited a binding
curve similar to that of wild-type ET-1, suggesting that this
change does not alter ETB receptor binding. However, it
should be noted that the IC50 of ET-1 for ETB
receptors is 0.2 nmol/L and that a C-terminal fragment of
ET-1-(16-21), ET-1, acts as an agonist for the ETB
receptors with an EC50 of 0.3 µmol/L.16
Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate that the loop structure
contributes to the receptor affinity.
The replacement of Lys9 by Glu to produce a net -3 charge instead of the normal net -1 charge in the loop region yielded very interesting results. The decrease in the ETA receptor binding and bioactivity with [Glu9]ET-1 could be explained in two ways: (1) Lys9 is directly involved in just receptor binding or in receptor binding and signaling. Replacement of this amino acid with Glu causes a decrease in both. (2) The conformation of the loop region is important for presenting the C-terminal region of the molecule to the receptor in the proper conformation. In this case, the introduction of an extra negative charge could disrupt this structure and indirectly result in a decrease in binding and bioactivity. Kimura et al13 demonstrated that the vasocontractile response to Lys9-nicked ET-1 develops and decays much faster than that of ET-1. In the present study, we did not observe a change in the kinetics of vasocontractility. However, when ET-1 was added to the coronary artery rings preconstricted with this mutant, only a partial response (35%) was detected. On the other hand, when similar experiments were performed on coronary rings pretreated with another mutant peptide, [Ala20]ET-1, ET-1 caused 100% contraction. These findings suggest that once [Glu9]ET-1 is bound to the ETA receptor, ET-1 cannot displace it completely, at least within the time frame of the experiment, and it partially blocks the effects of ET-1.
Takai et al20 reported that substitution of Glu at position 9 in a modified ET-1 fragment yields a potent and specific ETB agonist, IRL 1620, Suc-[Glu9,Ala11,15]ET-1-(8-21), with an IC50 of 16 pmol/L. Interestingly, another ET-1 analogue, IRL 1038, [Cys11,15]ET-1-(11-21), acts as an ETB receptor antagonist.21 Since IRL 1620, but not IRL 1038, has the charged residues Asp8, Glu9, and Glu10, it was suggested that these residues are involved in the vasoconstrictor activity and that replacement of Lys9 by Glu increases the affinity for the ETB receptor. As discussed above, this region of ET-1 might contribute to the selectivity and affinity of the ETB receptor. However, under the experimental conditions of the present study, Glu9 replacement did not increase the affinity to ETB receptors. Although S6c, in which Lys9 is naturally replaced by Glu, is known to be an ETB-selective agonist,22 its IC50 value (0.2 to 1 nmol/L) is very similar to that of [Glu9]ET-1 reported in the present study. This difference in the IC50 values between IRL 1620 and S6c is most likely due to the linear structure of IRL 1620 or the absence of the first eight amino acid residues.
Reports from several research groups have demonstrated that the C-terminal region is crucial for vasoconstrictor activity and that removal of Trp21 causes a 103-fold decrease in the contractile response mediated by the ETA receptor.13 15 Also, replacement of Trp21 by other aromatic residues, Phe or Tyr, caused a fivefold decrease in the vasoconstrictor activity,11 indicating that the indole ring of Trp is important for recognition and/or signaling by the ETA receptor. In the present study, we demonstrated that Ile20 and Trp21 are important for binding to ETB receptors as well. In addition, our findings that [Ala20]ET-1 exhibited decreased binding and bioactivity and that [Ala21]ET-1 showed only 15% binding and no bioactivity suggest that these residues are involved in both receptor binding and activation.
On the basis of studies with chimeric receptors between ETA
and ETB receptors, it was proposed that the ETs have two
distinct domains that determine the selectivity for ET
receptors.23 According to this model, the so-called
address domain containing the N-terminal loop structure is involved in
the recognition and binding to ETA receptors by interacting
with transmembrane domains IV to VI. The C-terminal region was
postulated to act as a message domain for the ET receptors and to be
responsible for signaling and subsequent bioactivity via interaction
with transmembrane domains I, II, III, and VII. However, our data
showing that residues 20 and 21 are involved in receptor binding and
vasoconstriction do not support this classification of the domain
structure of ET-1. Although the mechanism(s) by which the C-terminal
region of ET-1 interacts with the receptors is not known, one
possibility, as shown with some other G protein–coupled
receptors,24 25 is that the hydrophobic C-terminal region
of ET-1 may fold back, starting at about His16, and
intercalate into the membrane. If so, the side chains of
Lys140 in the second transmembrane domain or of
Lys159 in the third transmembrane domain of the
ETA receptor might be potential sites for an ion-ion
interaction involving the ET-1 
-carboxyl group. Although the
[Ala21]ET-1 mutant has this carboxyl group,
because of the lack of the indole ring of Trp21, the
peptide may not localize correctly on the membrane and thus cannot bind
to the receptor.
In conclusion, using recombinant point mutants of ET-1, we have shown that Ile20 and Trp21 are involved in binding to both receptor subtypes. In addition, Lys9 is an important residue for binding and activation of the ETA subtype, whereas replacement of this residue either by Ala or Glu does not affect its binding to the ETB receptor subtype.
|
Selected Abbreviations and Acronyms |
|---|
|
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported by the American Heart Association, Georgia Affiliate, Inc (Grant-in-Aid awards to Drs Tackett and Puett). Dr Ergul is the recipient of a Graduate Student Fellowship (92GSF/4) from the American Heart Association, Florida Affiliate, Inc. We would like to thank Dr Prema Narayan for critically reading the manuscript and Sondra Ricci and Kanili Shoemaker for expert technical assistance.
Received April 21, 1995; accepted August 21, 1995.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Inoue A, Yanagisawa M, Kimura S, Kasuya Y, Miyauchi T, Goto K, Masaki T. The human endothelin family: three structurally and pharmacologically distinct isopeptides predicted by three separate genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:2864-2867.
2.
Kloog Y, Ambar I, Sokolovsky M, Kochva E, Wollberg Z,
Bdolah A. Sarafotoxin, a novel vasoconstrictor peptide:
phosphoinositide hydrolysis in rat heart and
brain. Science. 1988;242:268-270.
3. Yanagisawa M, Kurihara H, Kimura S, Tomobe Y, Kobayashi M, Mitsui Y, Yazaki Y, Goto K, Masaki T. A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature. 1988;332:411-415. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Uchida Y, Ninomiya H, Saotome M, Nomura A, Ohtsuka M, Yanagisawa M, Goto K, Masaki T, Hasegawa S. Endothelin, a novel vasoconstrictor peptide, as potent bronchoconstrictor. Eur J Pharmacol. 1988;154:227. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Glassberg MK, Ergul A, Wanner A, Puett D. Endothelin promotes mitogenesis in airway smooth muscle cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1994;10:316-321. [Abstract]
6. Komura I, Kurihara H, Sujiyama F, Takaku F, Yazaki Y. Endothelin stimulates c-fos and c-myc expression and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. FEBS Lett. 1988;238:249-252. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Rubanyi GM, Polokoff MA. Endothelins: molecular biology, biochemistry, pharmacology, physiology, and pathophysiology. Pharmacol Rev. 1994;46:325-415. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Arai H, Hori S, Aramori I, Ohkubo H, Nakanishi S. Cloning and expression of a cDNA encoding an endothelin receptor. Nature. 1990;348:730-732. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Sakurai T, Yanagisawa M, Takuwa Y, Miyazaki H, Kimura S, Goto K, Masaki T. Cloning of a cDNA encoding a non-isopeptide-selective subtype of the endothelin receptor. Nature. 1990;348:732-753. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Masaki T. Endothelins: homeostatic and
compensatory actions in the circulatory and endocrine system.
Endocr Rev. 1993;14:256-268.
11. Nakajima K, Kubo S, Kumagaye S, Nishio H, Tsunemi M, Inui T, Kuroda H, Chino N, Watanabe T, Kimura T, Sakakibara S. Structure-activity relationships of endothelin: importance of charged groups. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;163:424-429. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Randall MD, Douglas SA, Hiley CR. Vascular activities of endothelin-1 and some alanyl substituted analogues in resistance beds of the rat. Br J Pharmacol. 1989;98:685-699. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Kimura S, Kasuya Y, Sawamura T, Shinmi O, Sugita S, Yanagisawa M, Goto K, Masaki T. Structure-activity relationships of endothelin: importance of the C-terminal moiety. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1988;156:1182-1186. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Sokolovsky M. Structure-function relationships of endothelins, sarafotoxins, and their receptor subtypes. J Neurochem. 1992;59:809-821. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Hirata Y, Yoshimi H, Emori T, Shichiri M, Marumo F, Watanabe TX, Kumagaye S, Nakajima K, Kimura T, Sakakibara S. Receptor binding activity and cytosolic free calcium response by synthetic endothelin analogs in cultured rat smooth muscle cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989;160:228-234. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Maggi CA, Guiliani S, Patacchini R. The C-terminal hexapeptide, endothelin-(16-21), discriminates between different endothelin receptors. Eur J Pharmacol. 1989;166:121-122. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Mihara S, Fujimoto M. The endothelin ETA receptor-specific effect of 50-235, a nonpeptide endothelin antagonist. Eur J Pharmacol. 1993;246:33-38. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Ergul A, Puett D. Trp-21 is important in the processing and secretion of big endothelin-1. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1995;110:89-95. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Tam JP, Liu W, Zhang J, Galantino M, Bertolero F, Cristiani C, Vaghi F, Castiglione R. Alanine scan of endothelin: importance of aromatic residues. Peptides. 1994;15:703-708. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Takai M, Umemura I, Yamasaki K, Watanabe T, Fujitani Y, Oda K, Urade Y, Inui T, Yamamura T, Okada T. A potent and specific agonist, Suc-[Glu9,Ala11,15]-endothelin-1(8-21), IRL 1620, for the ETB receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;184:953-959. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Urade Y, Fujitani Y, Oda K, Watakabe T, Umemura I, Takai M, Okada T, Sakata K, Karaki H. An endothelin B receptor-selective antagonist: IRL 1038, [Cys11-Cys15]-endothelin-1(11-21). FEBS Lett. 1992;311:12-16. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Williams DLJ, Jones KL, Pettibore DJ, Lis EV, Clineschmidt BV. Sarafotoxin S6c: an agonist which distinguishes between endothelin receptor subtypes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;175:556-561. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Sakamoto A, Yanagisawa M, Sawamura T, Enoki T, Ohtani
T, Sakurai T, Nakao K, Toyo-oka T, Masaki M. Distinct
subdomains of human endothelin receptors determine their selectivity to
endothelin-A-selective antagonist and
endothelin-B-selective agonists. J Biol
Chem. 1993;268:8547-8553.
24. Hibert MF, Trumpp-Kalmeyer S, Hoflack J, Bruinvels A. This is not a G protein-coupled receptor. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1993;14:7-12. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Mills RG, Ralston GB, King GF. The solution
structure of sarafotoxin-c. J Biol
Chem. 1994;269:23413-23419.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  N. Bhowmick, P. Narayan, and D. Puett The Endothelin Subtype A Receptor Undergoes Agonist- and Antagonist-Mediated Internalization in the Absence of Signaling Endocrinology, July 1, 1998; 139(7): 3185 - 3192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Ergul, K. Shoemaker, D. Puett, and R. L. Tackett Gender Differences in the Expression of Endothelin Receptors in Human Saphenous Veins In Vitro J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 1998; 285(2): 511 - 517. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||