Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1995;77:957-963

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beau, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Saffitz, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beau, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Saffitz, J. E.
(Circulation Research. 1995;77:957.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Relative Densities of Muscarinic Cholinergic and ß-Adrenergic Receptors in the Canine Sinoatrial Node and Their Relation to Sites of Pacemaker Activity

Scott L. Beau, Dwight E. Hand, Richard B. Schuessler, Burt I. Bromberg, Brian Kwon, John P. Boineau, Jeffrey E. Saffitz

From the Departments of Medicine, Surgery, Pediatrics, and Pathology, Washington University, St Louis, Mo.

Correspondence to Jeffrey E. Saffitz, MD, PhD, Department of Pathology, Box 8118, Washington University, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110. E-mail saffitz@pathology.wustl.edu.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract The site of earliest extracellular electrical activation in the sinoatrial node (SAN) is known to shift in response to autonomic stimuli, but the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon and the determinants of the location of dominant pacemaker activity have not been elucidated. The present study was designed to characterize the spatial distribution of muscarinic cholinergic and ß-adrenergic receptors in the canine SAN and to determine whether a consistent relationship exists between autonomic receptor densities and the site of dominant pacemaker activity. We used quantitative light-microscopic autoradiography of radioligand binding sites to characterize the spatial distribution of muscarinic cholinergic and ß-adrenergic receptor subtypes in tissue sections containing the SAN and adjacent right atrial muscle from 18 canine hearts. Muscarinic receptor density was 5.4 times greater in SAN cells than in atrial myocytes (P<.01). Total ß-adrenergic receptor density was more than 3 times greater in SAN cells than in atrial myocytes (P<.0001), due entirely to the significantly greater number of ß1-adrenergic receptors in the SAN. The region of dominant pacemaker activity, localized in 4 hearts with in vitro mapping, consistently exhibited greater densities of muscarinic and ß1-adrenergic receptors than other SAN regions. Muscarinic receptor density in the dominant pacemaker region was 18±2% and 29±7% higher than in adjacent superior and inferior regions, respectively. ß1-Receptor density in the dominant site was 53±5% and 26±4% higher than in adjacent superior and inferior SAN regions, respectively. Thus, the SAN is richly endowed with both muscarinic cholinergic and ß1-adrenergic receptors. Differential responsiveness to autonomic inputs, related perhaps to regional differences in receptor density, may help determine the spatial localization of pacemaker activity.


Key Words: ß-adrenergic receptor • muscarinic cholinergic receptor • sinoatrial node • atrial pacemaker complex • electrophysiological mapping


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The atrial pacemaker complex has been described as a group of widely distributed pacemakers in the sinoatrial node (SAN) and may also include extranodal atrial pacemaker sites.1 2 3 4 5 It has been hypothesized that this atrial pacemaker complex consists of a group of functionally differentiated cells that generate specific ranges of heart rates.6 Shifts in the site of earliest extracellular activation have been observed in numerous preparations,7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 particularly in response to direct nerve stimulation, or infusion of autonomic drugs or the naturally occurring neurotransmitters acetylcholine and norepinephrine.7 8 9 Multiple, spatially dispersed pacemaker sites also function spontaneously in the isolated, perfused canine right atrium preparation, in which the influences of neural input, circulating chronotropic substances, and reflexes are eliminated.18 As in the open-chest preparation, the location of earliest extracellular activation in the isolated perfused atrial preparation shifts in response to administration of acetylcholine and norepinephrine. With infusion of acetylcholine, the site of earliest activation shifts inferiorly in some preparations, associated with a decrease in rate, whereas in others a superior shift has been seen.18 With infusion of norepinephrine, the site of earliest activation is consistently found in the superior region of the SAN and exhibits an increased rate. These observations suggest that the superior region of the SAN may be more responsive to ß-adrenergic stimulation, possibly because of differences in receptor density or in receptor coupling to effector molecules, whereas there may be no consistent regional difference in SAN responsiveness to acetylcholine.

The SAN is richly endowed with ß-adrenergic receptors, as demonstrated by autoradiographic methods that permit direct measurement of receptor densities in small or complex structures.19 20 21 However, there has been no direct assessment of the relative distributions of muscarinic cholinergic receptor densities in the SAN and adjacent atrial muscle nor is it known whether regional receptor density differences within the SAN might correspond to the distribution of areas of pacemaker dominance. Accordingly, we used quantitative light-microscopic autoradiography to characterize the spatial distribution of muscarinic cholinergic receptors and ß-adrenergic receptor subtypes in the sinoatrial node and adjacent right atrial myocardium in the canine heart. We also characterized receptor densities in regions of dominant pacemaker activity, identified with electrophysiological mapping in vitro, to determine whether any consistent relationship exists between cholinergic or adrenergic receptor density and the location of dominant pacemaker activity.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Right Atrial Isolation and Tissue Acquisition
Normal adult mongrel dogs (n=18) weighing between 20 and 25 kg were anesthetized with 30 mg/kg of intravenous pentobarbital sodium. The dogs were intubated and ventilated with a positive-pressure Harvard respirator. A median sternotomy was performed and the heart was cradled in the pericardium. The azygous vein was ligated and divided and 100 µg/kg of intravenous heparin was administered. The right atrium was excised as previously described22 by ligating and dividing the inferior and superior venae cavae, cross-clamping the aorta, infusing cold cardioplegia solution into the aortic root, and covering the heart with iced saline. Tissue was acquired for quantitative autoradiographic studies by dissecting the SAN and the adjacent crista terminalis and right atrial free wall from the remainder of the atrium. The tissue was frozen rapidly in liquid nitrogen and stored in sealed containers at -70°C until used in experiments.

Tissue that was to be analyzed electrophysiologically was dissected in a similar fashion, except that the right coronary artery was first cannulated and perfused with Krebs-Henseleit solution equilibrated with 95% O2/5% CO2. The SAN and adjacent structures were excised and superfused in the same solution at 37°C.

Electrophysiological Studies
Activation maps (n=4) were constructed as previously described.22 Briefly, the endocardial surface of the dissected SAN and adjacent crista terminalis and right atrial free wall was placed on an electrode template containing 250 unipolar electrodes (interelectrode distance, 3 mm), and unipolar electrograms were acquired with a custom-designed VAX (Digital Equipment Corp) recording system. The time of local activation for each electrogram was determined by the maximum negative rate of voltage change (-dV/dtmax). To facilitate recording of transmembrane potentials, the fibrous layer of epicardium was carefully dissected away to permit penetration by microelectrodes into the underlying cells. No change was observed in activation sequence maps recorded before and after this dissection. Transmembrane potentials were recorded with a floating microelectrode to maintain a satisfactory impalement. The microelectrode tip was pulled in the conventional manner to a resistance of 20 to 40 m{Omega}.22 Microelectrode signals were recorded with a conventional electrometer (WPIDUO773) and displayed on a sweep oscilloscope (Tektronix 511).

The location of the dominant pacemaker was determined by identifying the earliest depolarizing cells within the sinus node. Multiple microelectrode impalements were performed from the epicardial side while unipolar extracellular electrograms were recorded simultaneously from the endocardial surface. The moment of activation for the transmembrane potentials was defined at the time of one half amplitude. Transmembrane potentials were referenced to the earliest electrogram, and cells were rejected as dominant pacemakers if their moment of activation failed to precede this electrogram by at least 20 milliseconds.22

Quantitative Autoradiography
Frozen, unfixed tissue blocks containing the SAN and adjacent atrial myocardium were cut into sections 12 µm thick in a plane parallel to the long axis of the node and the crista terminalis. To define radioligand binding and rinsing conditions suitable for identification of muscarinic cholinergic receptor densities in myocardial tissue sections, preliminary experiments were performed using transmural sections of unfixed canine left ventricular myocardium. Once these conditions were validated, muscarinic cholinergic receptor distributions were characterized in sections containing the SAN and adjacent atrial myocardium. Slide-mounted frozen tissue sections were incubated at 25°C in a buffer composed of (in mmol/L) NaCl 120, KCl 4.8, MgSO4 0.12, CaCl2 1.3, NaH2PO4 20.3, dextrose 10, pH 7.4, and containing 0.5 nmol/L L-[benzilic-4,4'-3H]quinuclidinyl benzilate ([3H]QNB) (45.4 Ci/mmol; New England Nuclear). Nonspecific binding was defined as binding of [3H]QNB in the presence of 1 µmol/L atropine. Nonspecifically bound radioactivity was removed by incubating tissue sections in the same buffer without radioligand or unlabeled displacer for 15 minutes at 22°C.

To measure the densities of total ß-adrenergic receptors and the ß1- and ß2-receptor subtypes in selected regions of the SAN and neighboring structures, sections were mounted on gelatin-coated slides and incubated for 1 hour at 37°C in a buffer composed of (in mmol/L) NaCl 154, MgCl2 10, Tris-HCl 10, pH 7.4, and containing 25 pmol/L (-)[125Iodo]cyanopindolol (ICYP) (2200 Ci/mmol; New England Nuclear). Nonspecific binding was defined as binding of radioligand in the presence of 1 µmol/L 1-propranolol. These autoradiographic conditions have been extensively validated in previous studies.23 24 25 Selective binding of radioligand to ß2-adrenergic receptors was achieved by incubating sections with 25 pmol/L ICYP in the presence of 0.1 µmol/L CGP-20712A, a ß1-selective displacer. In previous studies,23 we have shown that under these conditions, CGP-20712A maximally inhibits binding of ICYP to ß1-adrenergic receptors (93%) while minimally inhibiting binding to the ß2-subtype (0.8%). In all experiments, sections were incubated with radioligand in large volumes of buffer (50 mL) so that the concentration of free radioligand did not change measurably during incubation intervals. Nonspecifically bound radioactivity was removed by incubating tissue sections in the same buffer without radioligand or unlabeled displacer for 1 hour at 22°C. Previous studies have shown that this rinsing procedure removes the majority of nonspecifically bound radioactivity without removing any specifically bound radioligand.24 25 After being rinsed in buffer, sections were dipped briefly in distilled water to remove buffer solutes, dried under a gentle stream of air, and prepared for autoradiography as described below.

Muscarinic and adrenergic radioligand binding sites were localized autoradiographically in tissue sections using the emulsion-coated coverslip method, as previously described.26 Briefly, acid-washed, gelatin-coated coverslips coated with Kodak NTB2 nuclear track emulsion (Eastman Kodak) were glued at one end to slides containing radiolabeled sections. After exposure of the emulsion for either 6 weeks ([3H]QNB) or 24 hours (ICYP), the unglued edge of each coverslip was gently lifted from the slides, and the emulsion was developed with Kodak D19 developer diluted 1:1 with water for 4 minutes and fixed with Kodak fixer for 4 minutes at 25°C. After photographic processing, the tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and the coverslips were sealed permanently to the slides. The tissue and overlying developed grains in the emulsion layer were examined by light microscopy.

In all experiments, grain densities were determined by counting grains per unit tissue area of SAN or atrial muscle. Analysis of the distribution of muscarinic and total ß-adrenergic receptors as well as ß1- and ß2-receptor subtypes was performed as described in detail in previous publications.23 24 25 Receptor densities were determined by counting the number of autoradiographic grains in 10 to 15 separate test areas from at least three separate sections of each sample. The ß-receptor subtype grain-density values were corrected as previously described23 to account for the modest amount of binding of ICYP to ß1-receptors and the small degree of inhibition of ICYP binding to ß2-receptors that occurred under the experimental conditions.

The proportion of total tissue area occupied by SAN cells or atrial myocytes was assessed morphometrically by computer-assisted planimetry in selected sections stained with Masson’s trichrome stain, in which atrial myocytes are clearly distinguished from SAN cells and in which cells and extracellular matrix components are also clearly delineated. Groups of SAN and atrial myocytes corresponding to the same groups analyzed by receptor autoradiography in adjacent sections were displayed on a video monitor, and the aggregate cellular area in each region was measured. Grain-density measurements in corresponding regions of adjacent sections were normalized to account for variations in cell density.

In selected experiments, sections containing the SAN and adjacent atrial muscle were incubated with different concentrations of [3H]QNB (0.5 and 1.8 nmol/L) and ICYP (25 and 50 pmol/L), and after rinsing to remove nonspecifically bound radioactivity, the labeled sections were prepared for autoradiography. The ratio of specific grains per unit area of SAN and atrial muscle was measured for each concentration to determine whether the relative specific grain densities in those two compartments remained constant under different radioligand binding conditions.

Statistical Analysis
Radioligand grain-density data are expressed as mean±SD. The statistical significance of differences in grain density and morphometric parameters was determined with Student’s t test.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Muscarinic Receptor Density in SAN and Surrounding Atrial Muscle
Sections of canine left ventricle were used in initial studies to establish radioligand binding conditions suitable for autoradiographic quantification of muscarinic cholinergic receptors in myocardial tissue sections. It was determined that after incubation of slide-mounted sections in buffer containing radioligand, rinsing in the incubation buffer (not containing radioligand or unlabeled displacers) for 15 minutes at 22°C resulted in removal of >75% of nonspecifically bound radioactivity, whereas specifically bound radioligand was not removed (data not shown). However, more prolonged rinsing caused displacement of specifically bound radioligand. Analysis of radioligand association kinetics indicated that incubation of sections for 1 hour at 25°C was sufficient to achieve steady state binding over a broad range of radioligand concentrations (data not shown). Using these radioligand binding and rinsing conditions, we performed binding isotherms and Scatchard analysis with left ventricular sections. As shown in Fig 1Down, [3H]QNB binding was rapid, saturable, and of high affinity and specificity. A Kd of {approx}0.2 nmol/L was observed. In subsequent autoradiography studies involving the SAN and atrial muscle, sections were incubated with 0.5 nmol/L [3H]QNB, a concentration that leads to near-saturation binding but with an excellent specific-binding ratio (mean specific binding under these conditions in SAN sections was >80% of total binding).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Plots of binding isotherm (left) and Scatchard transformation (right) of [3H]QNB binding to transmural sections of canine left ventricle. Points are means of triplicate determinations of binding under steady state conditions. The Bmax is 34.1 fmol/mg protein and the Kd is 0.20 nmol/L.

Sections of right atrium from 17 dogs containing the SAN and adjacent atrial myocytes were incubated under equilibrium binding conditions with 0.5 nmol/L [3H]QNB alone or in the presence of 1 µmol/L atropine. The distribution of muscarinic receptors in the SAN and surrounding atrial muscle regions was determined autoradiographically. Representative preparations are shown in Figs 2Down and 3Down, and the combined results are shown in Fig 4Down. Muscarinic receptor density was greater in the SAN (446±69 grains/104 µm2) than in atrial myocytes (83±15 grains/104 µm2, P<.01). When muscarinic receptor density in the SAN was normalized to the muscarinic density of atrial muscle within each individual preparation, thus controlling for modest variations in actual measured radioligand concentrations based on counts and emulsion exposure intervals between experiments, the amount of specific binding was 6.1±0.8 times greater in SAN regions than in atrial myocytes (P<.01). Analysis of sections incubated with [3H]QNB concentrations of 0.5 or 1.8 nmol/L revealed no significant differences in the ratio of specific grain densities in the SAN and atrial muscle at each concentration. Thus, the greater specific radioligand binding localized to the SAN compared with atrial muscle was due to differences in muscarinic receptor densities in these two tissues rather than to differences in radioligand affinity by receptors in SAN and atrial muscle.



View larger version (127K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Micrographs of an atrial section stained with Masson’s trichrome stain. The upper panel is a low-power view of the SAN (between arrows) and the adjacent atrial muscle (A). Cross sections of the SAN artery are included (original magnification x50). Center and lower panels show higher-power views of the SAN (center) and atrial muscle (lower) (original magnification x400).



View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Representative autoradiographs showing relative muscarinic cholinergic receptor grain densities in SAN (left panels) and atrial myocytes (right panels). The upper panels are focused on the plane of the tissue, and the center panels are focused on the plane of the autoradiographic emulsion in a tissue section that was incubated with [3H]QNB alone. The grain densities reflect the sum of specific and nonspecific radioligand binding in SAN (left) and atrial (right) tissues. The lower panels show nonspecific grain densities in SAN (left) and atrial (right) areas in an adjacent tissue section that was incubated with [3H]QNB+atropine. Original magnification in all panels x1200.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Bar graph of muscarinic receptor grain densities in SAN (closed bars) and surrounding atrial muscle (open bars) from canine right atria (n=17). Tissue sections containing the SAN and adjacent atrium were incubated with 0.5 nmol/L [3H]QNB alone (total) or 0.5 nmol/L [3H]QNB+1 µmol/L atropine (nonspecific). At least 10 grain-density measurements were made in both regions in sections from each atrium. Specific grain densities were calculated by subtracting nonspecific from total grain densities. *P<.01.

ß-Adrenergic Receptor Densities in SAN and Surrounding Atrial Muscle
The relative proportions of total ß-receptors and of ß1- and ß2-receptor subtypes in the SAN and atrial muscle regions were determined autoradiographically. Fig 5Down summarizes data from 15 individual SAN–atrial muscle tissue preparations. Specific binding ratios were >=90% in both the SAN and atrial myocytes. The total ß-receptor density was more than three times greater in SAN cells than in atrial myocytes (P<.0001). This difference in the total ß-receptor densities of the two tissues (173 grains/104 µm2 section area) was due entirely to the significantly greater number of ß1-receptors in the SAN (mean difference, 173 grains/104 µm2, P<.0001). ß1-Receptors were 6.4-fold more abundant per unit cell area in the SAN than in atrial muscle (P<.01). In contrast, there were no significant differences in ß2 density in the SAN and atrial muscle. The SAN contained 86±2% ß1-receptors, whereas atrial myocytes contained only 59±6% ß1-receptor subtypes (P=.0003). Thus, the SAN region contains a very high concentration of ß1-receptors. However, the SAN does not express ß1-adrenergic receptors exclusively. It has a ß2-receptor density equivalent to the atrial content of ß2-adrenergic receptors. No differences in the SAN:atrial muscle ratio of total ß-adrenergic receptors or receptor subtypes were observed in sections incubated with 25 or 50 pmol/L ICYP. Thus, there were no apparent differences in affinity for ICYP by receptors in SAN versus atrial muscle.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Bar graph of specific ß-adrenergic receptor grain densities in SAN (closed bars) and surrounding atrial muscle (open bars) from canine right atria (n=15). Tissue sections containing the SAN and adjacent atrium were incubated with 25 pmol/L ICYP alone (total), 25 pmol/L ICYP+0.1 µmol/L CGP-20712A (ß1), or 25 pmol/L ICYP+1 µmol/L I-propranolol (nonspecific). At least 10 grain-density measurements were made in both regions in sections from each atrium. Total, ß1-specific, and ß2-specific grain densities were calculated as described in "Materials and Methods." *P<.0001.

Heterogeneous Distribution of Muscarinic and ß-Adrenergic Receptors in the SAN
To determine whether regions of dominant pacemaker activity are characterized by differences in muscarinic cholinergic and/or ß-adrenergic receptor density compared with other SAN regions, we measured receptor densities in the dominant pacemaker region and adjacent SAN regions in four separate preparations. All four preparations had a spontaneous rhythm in vitro with an average rate of 110±10 beats per minute. In each preparation, the dominant pacemaker site was mapped as previously described and its position was marked with a fine prolene suture. The location of the suture was readily identified in frozen sections, thereby facilitating analysis of autoradiographic grain densities in the immediate vicinity of the dominant pacemaker. In addition, grain densities were measured in selected regions of compact SAN that were located from 1 to 4 mm superior or inferior to the dominant pacemaker site. In all four preparations, the dominant pacemaker site was consistently located at the junction of the lower and middle thirds of the SAN. A diagram of the location of the dominant pacemaker is shown in Fig 6Down.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Diagram showing the location of the dominant pacemaker in a representative SAN/atrial muscle preparation. The schematic diagram on the left depicts the sinus node. The sites in the sinus node diagram marked A, B, and C show the locations of transmembrane and extracellular electrogram recordings shown in the correspondingly labeled center and right-hand panels. In the center panels, transmembrane potentials are shown in the upper tracings of each set, and the earliest extracellular electrograms are shown in the lower tracings. The panels on the right show the same recordings as the center panels, displayed at a faster sweep speed. The half-maximum amplitude of the transmembrane potentials, or the moment of activation, is marked by an asterisk. The transmembrane potentials are referenced to the earliest electrogram, shown in the lower trace. The line drawn through this reference point illustrates the functional heterogeneity within the sinus node. A, Recordings from a cell that was located 8 mm rostral to the dominant pacemaker. Its moment of activation is 35 milliseconds after the earliest electrogram. B, Dominant pacemaker. Its action potential preceded the onset of the earliest electrogram by 60 milliseconds. C, A cell whose moment of activation coincided with the onset of the earliest electrogram. It was located 1.5 mm rostral to the pacemaker shown in B. Extensive sampling at selected sites indicated that the earliest pacemaker activity occurred at site B. In the diagram, SVC indicates superior vena cava; RAA, right atrial appendage; CT, crista terminalis; SNA, sinus node artery; and IVC, inferior vena cava.

Grain-density analysis revealed that muscarinic, total ß-adrenergic, and ß1-adrenergic receptor densities were significantly greater in the dominant pacemaker region than in adjacent superior and inferior regions. Muscarinic receptor density in the dominant pacemaker region was 18±2% greater than in adjacent superior (rostral) and 29±7% greater than in adjacent inferior (caudal) SAN regions (P<.05 for both) (Fig 7Down). The dominant pacemaker region also had 50±5% more total ß-receptors than adjacent superior and 21±3% more than inferior SAN regions (P<.03 for both) (Fig 8Down). The differences were due entirely to increased ß1-receptor density in the dominant pacemaker region (53±5% more than in superior and 26±4% more than in inferior regions, P<.03 for both). ß2-Receptor densities were equal in all SAN regions. When the muscarinic or ß-adrenergic receptor densities of these SAN regions were normalized to the receptor density of atrial muscle (data not shown), a similar pattern of receptor distribution was observed.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Bar graph of specific muscarinic receptor grain densities in the dominant pacemaker region and adjacent SAN regions from canine right atria (n=4). Tissue sections were incubated with 0.5 nmol/L [3H]QNB alone or in the presence of 10-6 mol/L atropine, and specific grain density was derived by subtracting nonspecific from total binding. At least 10 grain-density measurements were made in each region in sections from each atrium. *P<.05.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Bar graph of specific ß1-receptor grain densities in the dominant pacemaker region and adjacent SAN region from canine right atria (n=4). Tissue sections were incubated with 25 pmol/L ICYP alone (total), 25 pmol/L ICYP+0.1 µmol/L CGP-20712A (ß1), or 25 pmol/L ICYP+1 µmol/L I-propranolol (nonspecific). Grain-density values were calculated as described in "Materials and Methods." At least 10 grain-density measurements were made in each region in sections from each atrium. *P=.03, **P<.01.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The purposes of this study were to characterize the spatial distribution of muscarinic cholinergic receptors and ß-adrenergic receptor subtypes in the SAN and adjacent right atrial myocardium and to determine whether regional receptor density differences within the SAN might correspond to the distribution of areas of pacemaker dominance in the canine heart.

Using quantitative light-microscopic autoradiography we observed that the canine SAN contained approximately six times more muscarinic receptors than the surrounding atrial muscle. We also showed that the SAN contained more than three times as many total ß-adrenergic receptors per unit tissue area than surrounding atrial muscle, due entirely to a greater ß1-adrenergic receptor density in the SAN. Approximately equal numbers of ß2-adrenergic receptors occurred in the SAN and surrounding atrial muscle. Therefore, the sinus node is richly endowed with both muscarinic cholinergic and ß-adrenergic receptors, consistent with its marked sensitivity to and functional dependence on parasympathetic and sympathetic stimuli.

Our observations concerning the relative proportions of muscarinic receptors in the SAN and atrial muscle are novel and were based on development and validation of methods for muscarinic receptor autoradiography. Our results on ß-adrenergic receptors are similar to those reported by Muntz.19 However, unlike Muntz, we observed that the canine SAN contained a significantly greater proportion of ß1-adrenergic receptors than that found in the adjacent atrial muscle. Muntz used subtype-selective displacers (betaxolol and ICI-118,551) that are <100-fold selective for their respective receptors, leading to some degree of radioligand binding to the inappropriate receptor subtype. This may have explained the modest differences reported by Muntz in the values for the percentage of ß1-receptors determined with betaxolol and ICI-118,551. In the present study, we used CGP-20712A, a displacer that is {approx}1000-fold selective for the ß1-adrenergic receptor subtype, thus minimizing uncertainty caused by limited subtype selectivity of displacing ligands. Other than this limited discrepancy between our data and Muntz’s findings, however, the results of the two studies are highly consistent.

By measuring the muscarinic and ß-adrenergic receptor densities at sites of dominant pacemaker activity in the isolated perfused atrial preparation, we were able to determine whether further levels of heterogeneity exist within the SAN. The current finding that muscarinic cholinergic receptor density was highest in the region of the dominant pacemaker may explain recent observations showing that the location of dominant pacemaker activity shifts in response to cholinergic stimulation.27 Thus, a direct negative effect of acetylcholine, mediated by muscarinic cholinergic receptors, may underlie a shift in dominant pacemaker activity away from the site of highest muscarinic cholinergic receptor density. The finding that the area of greatest ß-adrenergic receptor density consistently coincided with the location of dominant pacemaker activity in the absence of circulating catecholamines or autonomic nerve inputs suggests a central role for the ß-adrenergic receptor in the modulation of dominant pacemaker location and rate. The 26% to 53% differences in ß-adrenergic receptor density between the dominant pacemaker region and adjacent SAN regions are quantitatively similar to the physiologically important differences in ß-receptor density found by Bristow et al28 29 in patients with congestive heart failure compared with normal subjects. Although our data cannot fully explain the underlying mechanism, it is interesting to note that the ß2-receptor has recently been shown to exert an inotropic influence even in the absence of epinephrine.30 Independent functioning of the ß1-adrenergic receptor could similarly influence chronotropic activity in the SAN.

Results of previous studies18 have shown that infusion of norepinephrine reproducibly shifts the site of earliest extracellular activation superiorly within the SAN. Our present data would predict that the ß-adrenergic receptor density in the shifted sites should be lower than that found in the dominant pacemaker site. Therefore, if the ß-receptor is a primary modulator of the site of pacemaker dominance, our data would predict that the location of dominant pacemaker activity under basal conditions and during adrenergic stimulation would be the same. Although no data exist in canine preparations, results of rabbit SAN studies support this conclusion31 and are consistent with the temporal and spatial dissociation observed between extracellular electrograms and pacemakers in the SAN.22 Future experiments to determine muscarinic cholinergic and ß-adrenergic receptor density in the dominant pacemaker regions identified in response to autonomic stimuli will be required to confirm this prediction.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants HL-32257, HL-33722, and HL-17646 SCOR in Coronary and Vascular Diseases. Dr Beau was supported by an ACC/Merck Adult Cardiology Fellowship Award. We thank Timothy Tolley for technical assistance and Susan Johnson for secretarial assistance.

Received February 21, 1995; accepted August 8, 1995.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Boineau JP, Schuessler RB, Mooney CR, Wylds AC, Miller CB, Hudson RD, Borremans JM, Brockus CW. Multicentric origin of the atrial depolarization wave: the pacemaker complex. Circulation. 1978;58:1036-1048. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Boineau JP, Canavan TE, Schuessler RB, Cain ME, Corr PB, Cox JL. Demonstration of a widely distributed atrial pacemaker complex in the human heart. Circulation. 1988;77:1221-1237. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Cranefield PF, Hoffman BF, Siebens AA. Anodal excitation of cardiac muscle. Am J Physiol.. 1957;190:383-390.

4. Sealy WC, Bache RJ, Seaber AV, Bhattacharga SK. The atrial pacemaking site after surgical exclusion of the sinoatrial node. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.. 1973;65:841-850. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Randall WC, Talano J, Kaye MP, Euler D, Jones S, Brynjolfsson G. Cardiac pacemakers in absence of SA node: responses to exercises and autonomic blockade. Am J Physiol.. 1978;234:H465-H470.

6. Boineau JP, Schuessler RB, Hackel DB, Miller CB, Brockus CW, Wylds AC. Widespread distribution and rate differentiation of the atrial pacemaker complex. Am J Physiol.. 1980;239:H406-H415.

7. Schuessler RB, Boineau JP, Wylds AC, Hill DA, Miller CB, Roeske WR. Effect of canine cardiac nerves on heart rate, rhythm, and pacemaker location. Am J Physiol.. 1986;250:H630-H644.

8. Geesbreght JM, Randall WC. Area localization of shifting cardiac pacemakers during sympathetic stimulation. Am J Physiol.. 1971;220:1522-1527.

9. Goldberg JM. Intra-SA-nodal pacemaker shifts induced by autonomic nerve stimulation in the dog. Am J Physiol.. 1975;229:1116-1123.

10. West TC. Ultramicroelectrode recording from the cardiac pacemaker. J Pharmacol Exp Ther.. 1955;115:283-290. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Trautwein W, Uchizono K. Electron microscopic and electrophysiologic study of the pacemaker in the sinoatrial node of the rabbit heart. Z Zellforsch.. 1963;61:96-109. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Sano T, Yamagishi S. Spread of excitation from the sinus node. Circ Res.. 1965;16:423-430. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Eyster JAE, Meek WJ. Experiments on the origin and conduction of the cardiac impulse. Arch Intern Med.. 1916;18:775-799.

14. Sano T, Iida Y. The sinoatrial connection and wandering pacemaker. J Electrocardiol.. 1968;1:147-154. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Eccles JC, Hoff HE. The rhythm of the heartbeat, I: location, action potential and electrical excitability of the pacemaker. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci.. 1934;115:307-327. [Free Full Text]

16. Le Heuzey JY, Guize L, Valty J, Moutet JP, Kouz S, Lavergne T, Boutjdir M, Peronneau P. Intracellular and extracellular recordings of sinus node activity: comparison with estimated sinoatrial conduction times during pacemaker shifts in rabbit heart. Cardiovasc Res.. 1986;20:81-88. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Watanabe H, Perry JB, Page P, Savard P, Nadeau R. Vagal effects on sinoatrial and atrial conduction studied with epicardial mapping in dogs: the influence of pacemaker shifts on the measurement of sinoatrial conduction time. Can J Physiol Pharmacol.. 1985;63:113-121. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Schuessler RB, Bromberg BI, Boineau JP. Effect of neurotransmitters on the activation sequence of the isolated atrium. Am J Physiol.. 1990;258:H1632-H1641. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Muntz KH. Autoradiographic characterization of ß-adrenergic receptor subtypes in the canine conduction system. Circ Res.. 1992;71:51-57. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Saito K, Torda T, Potter WZ, Saavedra JM. Characterization of ß1- and ß2-adrenoceptor subtypes in the rat sinoatrial node and stellate ganglia by quantitative autoradiography. Neurosci Lett.. 1989;96:35-41. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Molenaar P, Canale E, Summers RJ. Autoradiographic localization of beta-1 and beta-2 adrenoceptors in guinea pig atrium and regions of the conduction system. J Pharmacol Exp Ther.. 1987;241:1048-1064. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Bromberg BI, Hand DE, Schuessler RB, Boineau JP. Failure of primary negativity to predict location of the dominant pacemaker locus: implication for sinoatrial conduction. Am J Physiol. In press.

23. Beau SL, Tolley TK, Saffitz JE. Heterogeneous transmural distribution of ß–adrenergic receptor subtypes in failing human hearts. Circulation. 1993;88:2501-2509. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Murphree SS, Saffitz JE. Distribution of ß-adrenergic receptors in failing human myocardium: implications for mechanisms of down-regulation. Circulation. 1989;79:1214-1225. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Murphree SS, Saffitz JE. Quantitative autoradiographic delineation of the distribution of ß-adrenergic receptors in canine and feline left ventricular myocardium. Circ Res.. 1987;60:568-579. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Young WS, Kuhar MJ. A new method for receptor autoradiography: [3H]opioid receptors in the rat brain. Brain Res.. 1979;179:225-270.

27. Rodefeld MD, Bromberg BI, Beau SL, Tolley TK, Schuessler RB, Boineau JP, Saffitz JE. Autonomic determinants of the site of dominant pacemaker activity in the canine sinoatrial node. Circulation. 1994;90:I-4. Abstract.

28. Bristow MR, Ginsberg R, Minobe W, Cubicciotti RS, Sageman WS, Lurie K, Billingham ME, Harrison DC, Stinson EB. Decreased catecholamine sensitivity and beta-adrenergic receptor density in failing human hearts. N Engl J Med.. 1982;307:205-211. [Abstract]

29. Bristow MR, Ginsberg R, Umans V, Fowler M, Minobe W, Rasmussen R, Zera P, Menlove R, Shah P, Jamieson S, Stinson EB. Beta-1 and beta-2 adrenergic receptor subpopulations in nonfailing and failing human ventricular myocardium: coupling of both receptor subtypes to muscle contraction and selective beta-1 receptor downregulation in heart failure. Circ Res.. 1986;59:297-309. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Milano CA, Allen LF, Rockman HA, Dolber PC, McMinn TR, Chien KR, Johnson TD, Bond RA, Lefkowitz RJ. Enhanced myocardial function in transgenic mice overexpressing the ß2-adrenergic receptor. Science.. 1994;264:582-586. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Mackaay AJC, Hof TO, Bleeker WK, Jongsma HJ, Bouman LN. Interaction of adrenaline and acetylcholine on cardiac pacemaker function: functional inhomogeneity of the rabbit sinus node. J Pharmacol Exp Ther.. 1980;214:417-422.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. E. Lyashkov, T. M. Vinogradova, I. Zahanich, Y. Li, A. Younes, H. B. Nuss, H. A. Spurgeon, V. A. Maltsev, and E. G. Lakatta
Cholinergic receptor signaling modulates spontaneous firing of sinoatrial nodal cells via integrated effects on PKA-dependent Ca2+ cycling and IKACh
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2009; 297(3): H949 - H959.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
M. E. Mangoni and J. Nargeot
Genesis and Regulation of the Heart Automaticity
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2008; 88(3): 919 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
C. P. Bolter and D. J. English
The effects of tertiapin-Q on responses of the sinoatrial pacemaker of the guinea-pig heart to vagal nerve stimulation and muscarinic agonists
Exp Physiol, January 1, 2008; 93(1): 53 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. E. Lyashkov, M. Juhaszova, H. Dobrzynski, T. M. Vinogradova, V. A. Maltsev, O. Juhasz, H. A. Spurgeon, S. J. Sollott, and E. G. Lakatta
Calcium Cycling Protein Density and Functional Importance to Automaticity of Isolated Sinoatrial Nodal Cells Are Independent of Cell Size
Circ. Res., June 22, 2007; 100(12): 1723 - 1731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
V. V. Fedorov, W. J. Hucker, H. Dobrzynski, L. V. Rosenshtraukh, and I. R. Efimov
Postganglionic nerve stimulation induces temporal inhibition of excitability in rabbit sinoatrial node
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): H612 - H623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. Barbuti, B. Gravante, M. Riolfo, R. Milanesi, B. Terragni, and D. DiFrancesco
Localization of Pacemaker Channels in Lipid Rafts Regulates Channel Kinetics
Circ. Res., May 28, 2004; 94(10): 1325 - 1331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. Wu, R. B. Schuessler, M. D. Rodefeld, J. E. Saffitz, and J. P. Boineau
Morphological and membrane characteristics of spider and spindle cells isolated from rabbit sinus node
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2001; 280(3): H1232 - H1240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M.R. Boyett, H. Honjo, and I. Kodama
The sinoatrial node, a heterogeneous pacemaker structure
Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2000; 47(4): 658 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. Opthof, R. Coronel, H. M. E. Rademaker, J. T. Vermeulen, F. J. G. Wilms-Schopman, and M. J. Janse
Changes in Sinus Node Function in a Rabbit Model of Heart Failure With Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Death
Circulation, June 27, 2000; 101(25): 2975 - 2980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
T. Opthof
The normal range and determinants of the intrinsic heart rate in man
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2000; 45(1): 177 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Pelat, P. Verwaerde, C. Merial, J. Galitzky, M. Berlan, J.-L. Montastruc, and J.-M. Senard
Impaired Atrial M2-Cholinoceptor Function in Obesity-Related Hypertension
Hypertension, November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1066 - 1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
P. Beaulieu, R. Cardinal, P. Page, F. Francoeur, J. Tremblay, and C. Lambert
Positive chronotropic and inotropic effects of C-type natriuretic peptide in dogs
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 1997; 273(4): H1933 - H1940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beau, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Saffitz, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beau, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Saffitz, J. E.