Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1995;77:702-709

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ullian, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ullian, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, L. G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
(Circulation Research. 1995;77:702-709.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Corticosterone Metabolism and Effects on Angiotensin II Receptors in Vascular Smooth Muscle

Michael E. Ullian, Lyle G. Walsh

From the Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract It has been postulated that mineralocorticoids can bind to corticosteroid receptors in the kidney, because glucocorticoids are metabolized to inactive compounds. The present study was performed to delineate glucocorticoid metabolism by rat vascular tissue and to determine the activity of these metabolites. Vascular segments converted 25% to 30% of corticosterone (compound B), the major glucocorticoid in the rat, to 11-dehydrocorticosterone (compound A) but not to aldosterone or 6ß-hydroxycorticosterone. In cultured vascular smooth muscle cells, 10% of compound B was converted to compound A, whereas >60% of compound A was converted to compound B. The 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase inhibitor carbenoxolone (1 µmol/L) completely blocked conversion in both directions. Whereas 6ß-hydroxycorticosterone did not upregulate angiotensin II receptor binding (a marker for corticosteroid action in vascular smooth muscle), compound A caused concentration-dependent upregulation. Compound A was almost (75%) as effective and as potent as compound B in upregulating angiotensin II binding. Upregulation elicited by exposure to compound A persisted in the presence of 1 µmol/L carbenoxolone, which completely prevented the conversion of compound A to compound B. Compound A, even in the presence of carbenoxolone, effected other glucocorticoid actions by inhibiting cell growth and potentiating angiotensin II–stimulated inositol phosphate formation. In summary, compound B and compound A are interconverted in vascular tissue, and the latter displays significant glucocorticoid action. The concentration excess of compound B in the circulation and the activity of its metabolite compound A will make it difficult for mineralocorticoids to gain access to corticosteroid receptors in the vasculature.


Key Words: angiotensin II • vascular smooth muscle • corticosterone • 11-dehydrocorticosterone


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Glucocorticoids are essential for the maintenance of blood pressure and, in excess, cause hypertension. Although the mechanisms of the blood pressure–elevating effects of glucocorticoids are not completely worked out, increases in peripheral vascular resistance contribute substantially.1 2 3 Glucocorticoids (and mineralocorticoids as well) increase vascular tone by potentiating the vasoconstrictor action of a number of pressor hormones, including {alpha}-adrenergic agonists4 5 6 7 and angiotensin II (Ang II),4 8 and the first step in this potentiation is upregulation of the receptors in vascular smooth muscle for these pressor hormones. Ang II receptor number is increased in resistance vessels from animals made hypertensive with corticosteroids9 10 11 and in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) exposed in culture to a number of natural and synthetic glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids.11 12 13 It is most likely that corticosteroids upregulate Ang II receptors by inducing the gene for the Ang II AT1 receptor, the predominant Ang II receptor subtype in vascular smooth muscle. The presence of specific receptors for glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids in vascular smooth muscle has been documented,14 15 16 and incubation of cultured VSMCs with the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone resulted in increases in steady state levels of AT1 receptor mRNA.17 18

Although it is well established that glucocorticoids potentiate Ang II receptor function, it is unclear whether glucocorticoid metabolites do likewise. An obvious homeostatic role for metabolism is limitation of hormone action by hormone inactivation. Most of our knowledge of metabolism of glucocorticoids (cortisol in humans and corticosterone [compound B] in rats) and of activity of metabolites of compound B derives from studies in renal and hepatic tissue. The 6ß-hydroxylase metabolite of compound B, 6ß-hydroxycorticosterone, stimulates sodium transport in certain renal preparations.19 More attention has been paid to the 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11ßOHSD) product of compound B, 11-dehydrocorticosterone (compound A). Funder et al20 have suggested that the abundance of 11ßOHSD in the kidney explains how the kidney can be a mineralocorticoid target tissue despite the facts that circulating compound B concentrations exceed circulating mineralocorticoid (ie, aldosterone) concentrations by 1000-fold and that compound B and aldosterone bind with comparable affinities to isolated preparations of mineralocorticoid receptors. This theory assumes that 11ßOHSD converts the active compound B to an inactive product, compound A. However, recent studies suggest that compound A may not be inactive in renal tissue.21 22

Patterns of metabolism of compound B by vascular smooth muscle and activity of these metabolites in the blood vessel have not been investigated in detail. Several studies over the past few years have demonstrated 11ßOHSD activity in vascular smooth muscle,23 24 25 suggesting that the vasculature may be a mineralocorticoid target tissue like the kidney. Compound A would be generated within VSMCs upon metabolism of compound B by 11ßOHSD. Whether VSMCs contain 6ß-hydroxylase is unknown. It is also unknown whether compound A or 6ß-hydroxycorticosterone, like compound B, potentiates Ang II action in VSMCs.

The purpose of these studies, therefore, was to test the hypothesis that metabolites of compound B potentiate Ang II action in vascular smooth muscle. Only metabolites previously demonstrated to possess activity in nonvascular tissue were studied in vascular tissue. After delineating compound B metabolism in intact blood vessels and cultured VSMCs, we determined how these metabolites affect Ang II receptor binding, Ang II–stimulated signal transduction, and Ang II–stimulated vasoconstriction.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
General Methods
Unless otherwise indicated, all experiments were performed at 37°C. Control treatment was exposure to equal concentrations (<1%) of the steroid vehicle ethanol. Data are presented as mean±SEM.

Preparation of [3H]Compound A
Four kidneys were removed from 250- to 300-g Sprague-Dawley rats and homogenized with a polytron (Kinematica) for 30 seconds in 5 mL Krebs-Henseleit buffer. [3H]Compound B was converted to [3H]compound A in identical reactions in 12 test tubes with polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon)-coated tops, each of which contained 275 µL renal homogenate, 3 µL ethanol, 3 µL 20% bovine serum albumin, 3 µL 20 mmol/L NADP, and 0.1 nmol [3H]compound B. The reaction proceeded for 4 hours and was stopped with enough chloroform/methanol (1:2) to achieve a single phase. After a 24-hour extraction period, two phases were created by the addition of H2O. The organic phase was isolated, dried with N2, dissolved in 250 µL ethanol, and spotted on silica G thin-layer chromatography plates (250 µm thick) in 12 separate lanes. Unlabeled compound A and compound B also were spotted. Migration solution consisted of chloroform/ethanol (92:8). Silica corresponding to compound A was scraped from all 12 lanes and combined (Rf for compound B is 0.57, and Rf for compound A is 0.71). Lipids were extracted from the silica with 2 mL chloroform/methanol (1:2) for 24 hours, and thin-layer chromatography was repeated to further purify compound A. Comparison of radioactivity in silica corresponding to compounds A and B after the second thin-layer chromatography demonstrated that >95% of putative compound A was indeed compound A.

Corticosteroid Metabolism
Confluent VSMCs in six-well plates or 30-mm segments of aorta, which were free of fat and adventitia, from 250- to 300-g Sprague-Dawley rats were incubated with 0.015 nmol [3H]compound A or [3H]compound B (200 000 cpm) in 2 mL MEM for 24 hours. Metabolism was stopped by adding tissue and medium to chloroform/methanol (1:2) in sufficient quantity to achieve a single phase. After a 24-hour period of organic extraction, two phases were created with H2O. The organic phase was isolated, dried, dissolved in ethanol, and spotted on Silica G thin-layer chromatography plates (250 µm thick). Unlabeled standards of corticosteroids and metabolites also were spotted. Migration solution consisted of chloroform/ethanol (92:8). For each sample spotted, the silica corresponding to the standards was scraped and counted in 10 mL scintillation fluid. Blanks contained no vascular tissue but otherwise were handled similarly.

Mass Spectrometry
Liquid secondary ion mass spectrometry ionization was carried out on a JEOL HX110/HX110 high-performance tandem mass spectrometer operating at a resolution of 1500. Corticosteroids were dissolved in ethanol (1 mmol/L) and mixed with glycerol (1:1 [vol/vol]) on the sample probe. Samples were bombarded with 15-keV Cs+ ions to achieve ionization. Typically, three to five scans were summed to produce a mass spectrum.

VSMC Isolation, Maintenance, and Characterization
Aortas from Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 125 to 300 g were cleaned of endothelium, fat, and adventitia. Smooth muscle strips were incubated in collagenase (2 mg/2 mL) for 2 hours, cut into 2-mm2 pieces, and allowed to adhere to a culture flask. Then a covering layer of growth medium (10% [vol/vol] newborn calf serum and 1% [vol/vol] nonessential amino acids, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin in MEM) was added. Cells were incubated in humidified 5% CO2/95% air atmosphere until confluent. Medium was changed every 5 days. Cells were passaged every 7 to 10 days by harvesting with trypsin-EDTA and seeded at a ratio of 1:4. Cells exhibited characteristic stellate VSMC morphology and stained positively for smooth muscle {alpha}-actin.26

Ang II Binding
Binding studies were performed in duplicate wells of 24-well plates. Binding buffer consisted of 50 mmol/L Tris, 100 mmol/L NaCl, 5 mmol/L KCl, 5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.25% bovine serum albumin, and 0.5 mg/mL bacitracin, pH 7.4. Incubation volume was 300 µL. Single-concentration Ang II receptor binding studies were performed by adding 125I–Ang II (50 fmol) to all wells and 1 µmol/L unlabeled Ang II to certain wells (for the determination of nonspecific binding, <15% of total binding). Full competition binding studies for Scatchard analysis were performed by adding 125I–Ang II (50 fmol) to all wells and 10 concentrations of unlabeled Ang II (0.5 nmol/L to 10 µmol/L) to various wells. Studies were performed at 4°C for 90 minutes to obtain surface binding equilibrium only.27 Free hormone was removed by washing monolayers three times with ice-cold saline. Cells were solubilized with 0.1% SDS/0.1N NaOH, and gamma radioactivity was counted. In previous studies we have found that Ang II receptors on cultured VSMCs, both basal and upregulated, are of the AT1 subtype and that Ang II receptor binding parameters are not affected by cell passage (passages 3 to 10) or the body weight of the animals at the time of study (125 to 300 g).13

Phospholipid Labeling and Measurement of Inositol Phosphates
Cells in six-well plates were incubated with 5 to 10 µCi myo-[2-3H]inositol/2 mL per well in inositol-deficient growth medium for 24 hours. Preliminary studies revealed that steady state uptake of [3H]myoinositol occurred after 24 hours and ranged from 100 000 to 500 000 cpm per well. After exposure to effectors, reactions were terminated by the addition of 1 mL ice-cold 20% trichloroacetic acid. Protein precipitates were discarded, and supernatants were extracted three times with equal volumes of diethyl ether. The upper ether phase was discarded. Samples were adjusted to pH 7 with 50 mmol/L Tris base and transferred to 20-mm columns of AG1-X8 anion exchange resin at room temperature. Radioactivity elutable with water and borax (5 mmol/L sodium borate and 60 mmol/L sodium formate) was discarded. Total inositol phosphates were eluted with 1.0 mol/L ammonium formate in 0.1 mol/L formic acid. Fractions were counted in a scintillation counter. Basal values for total inositol phosphates ranged from 3000 to 6000 cpm per well (15 000 to 25 000 cpm/mg protein).

Thymidine Incorporation
This assay was performed as a measure of DNA synthesis. After the effector treatment period, VSMCs in duplicate wells of 24-well plates were incubated with [3H]thymidine (1 µCi/1 mL per well) for 5 hours. After two saline washes, 0.5 mL of 0.3 mol/L perchloric acid was added for 30 seconds. One saline wash was followed by solubilization in 1 mL of 0.1% SDS/0.1N NaOH. Cells were scraped into vials containing 5 mL of scintillation fluid, and radioactivity was determined in a scintillation counter. In preliminary studies, VSMCs that were serum deprived for 24 hours and then incubated with [3H]thymidine and varying concentrations (0.1% to 10%) of serum incorporated thymidine in direct proportion to the concentration of serum. Basal thymidine incorporation ranged from 10 000 to 50 000 cpm per well.

Protein Determination
Cell protein content was determined by a minor alteration of the method of Lowry et al,28 in that absorbance was read at 660 nm.

Aortic Ring Contractions
Thoracic aortas from 250- to 300-g Sprague-Dawley rats were cleaned of adventitia and cut into rings 5 mm in length. Rings were exposed to steroids or vehicle for 24 hours in 50 mL of Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate buffer bubbled with 95% O2/5% CO2 at pH 7.4 at room temperature. Then rings were attached to an isometric force-displacement transducer under 2 g of tension and equilibrated for 1 hour in the same buffer system at 37°C. Effectors of contraction (Ang II and KCl) in 10-µL volumes were added simultaneously to control and experimental rings in side-by-side 10-mL organ chambers to achieve the desired final concentrations. Ang II (100 nmol/L) elicited transient contractions that peaked in 4 to 6 minutes and spontaneously resolved (even in the continued presence of Ang II) in 8 to 10 minutes. KCl (120 mmol/L) elicited a prolonged contraction. Intensity of contraction (ie, the peak of the contraction curve) was expressed as grams tension per milligram dry weight of aorta. Comparisons between treatments were made in a paired manner between rings derived from the same aorta, since contractions varied considerably from aorta to aorta.

Materials
Compound B, compound A, carbenoxolone, bovine serum albumin, nonessential amino acids, penicillin, streptomycin, bacitracin, and trypsin-EDTA were from Sigma Chemical Co; Ang II, from Peninsula Laboratories; radioisotopes, from New England Nuclear; rats, from Harlan Sprague Dawley, Indianapolis, Ind; MEM, from Mediatech; collagenase, from Worthington Biochemical; 6ß-hydroxycorticosterone, from Steraloids, Inc; newborn calf serum, from Hyclone Laboratories; thin-layer chromatography plates, from Alltech Associates, Inc; and anion exchange resin, from Bio-Rad Laboratories. RU38486 was kindly provided by Dr D. Philibert, Roussel Uclaf, Romainville, France.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Corticosteroid Metabolism
Initial studies were performed to determine the metabolic products of compound B by use of intact rat aorta. Rat aorta was used because cultured VSMCs were explanted from rat aorta. Conversion to compound A, aldosterone, and 6ß-hydroxycorticosterone were evaluated because compound B can be converted in the adrenal gland and possibly in VSMCs29 to aldosterone, which is a known upregulator of Ang II receptor number and stimulated signal transduction,12 13 and compound A and 6ß-hydroxycorticosterone may be active in renal tissue.19 21 22 Incubation of these vessels for 24 hours with compound B resulted in 25% to 30% conversion to compound A but no conversion to aldosterone or 6ß-hydroxycorticosterone (Fig 1Down).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Metabolism of [3H]compound B by intact aorta. Segments of rat aorta were incubated with [3H]compound B in culture medium for 24 hours, and lipids were extracted from segments and medium and separated by thin-layer chromatography. Data are presented as radioactivity corresponding to the steroid of interest as a fraction of radioactivity corresponding to all steroids. Blank denotes reaction without vascular tissue. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with the Student-Newman-Keuls test for comparison of means. B indicates compound B; A, compound A; Al, aldosterone; and 6ß, 6ß-hydroxycorticosterone (n=4-8). *Difference (P<.05) from blank for compound B. **Difference (P<.05) from blank for compound A.

Additional studies were performed in cultured VSMCs to determine if compound B can be converted to compound A and vice versa. Incubation with compound B resulted in moderate (10%) conversion to compound A after 24 hours, whereas incubation with compound A resulted in significantly more conversion (>60%) to compound B after 24 hours (Fig 2Down). The 11ßOHSD inhibitor carbenoxolone completely blocked conversion in both directions.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Interconversion of [3H]compound B ([3H]CompB) and [3H]compound A ([3H]CompA) by cultured vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Confluent VSMCs in six-well plates were incubated with [3H]CompB or [3H]CompA in the presence and absence of 1 µmol/L carbenoxolone (Carb) for 24 hours. Lipids were extracted from cells and medium and separated by thin-layer chromatography. Radioactivity in the silica corresponding to CompB and CompA was determined. Conversion of CompA to CompB was quantified as counts per minute (cpm) for CompB/(cpm for CompB+cpm for CompA)100, and conversion of CompB to CompA was quantified as cpm for CompA/(cpm for CompA+cpm for CompB)100. Open bars represent data from experimental blanks. Separate analyses were performed for conversion of CompB to CompA and for conversion of CompA to CompB. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with the Student-Newman-Keuls test for comparison of means (n=4-8).

Effects of Metabolites on Ang II Receptor Binding
Relative abilities of metabolites of compound B to regulate Ang II receptor binding were investigated (Fig 3Down). Incubation of VSMCs for 24 hours with compound B resulted in concentration-dependent increases in Ang II binding, as demonstrated by us previously.13 6ß-Hydroxycorticosterone, in concentrations ranging from 0.1 nmol/L to 1 µmol/L, did not alter Ang II binding, whereas compound A caused concentration-dependent upregulation of Ang II binding. The threshold for the upregulating effect was between 0.1 and 1 nmol/L for both compounds B and A, but the maximal effect at 1 µmol/L was 50% greater with compound B than with compound A. Values of maximal upregulation of Ang II binding with 1 µmol/L compound A and with 1 µmol/L of the mineralocorticoid aldosterone were similar: 163±2% of control (aldosterone) versus 168±10% of control (compound A) (n=4). To determine if upregulation of Ang II receptors on exposure to compound B or compound A is mediated through glucocorticoid receptors, studies were performed in the presence of RU38486, a specific antagonist for glucocorticoid receptors.30 Upregulation of Ang II binding by compound A or compound B was completely inhibited by RU38486 (Fig 3Down). It has been demonstrated previously in VSMCs that RU38486 alone does not alter Ang II binding.13



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Regulation of angiotensin II (Ang II) binding by compound B (CompB) and metabolites in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Confluent VSMCs were incubated with steroids with or without 1 µmol/L RU38486 (RU) for 24 hours, and then Ang II binding was performed. The 100% value represents binding in the presence of vehicle only. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with the Student-Newman-Keuls test for comparison of main effects of the treatments (n=4-6). Binding after exposure to 6ß-hydroxycorticosterone (6ß-OHB) and compound A (CompA)+RU and CompB+RU was not different from binding with vehicle. *Difference (P<.01) from CompB. **Difference (P<.01) from CompA+RU. +Difference (P<.01) from CompA. ++Difference (P<.01) from CompB+RU.

Although commercially obtained compound A was used in the studies detailed above, compound A itself may not have mediated the upregulation in Ang II binding. Studies were performed to examine this possibility. The commercially obtained stock of compound A was studied for cross contamination with compound B. Samples of 1-mmol/L stocks of compounds A and B in ethanol were spotted in separate lanes on thin-layer chromatography plates, and iodine staining revealed that compound A was not contaminated with compound B (data not shown). Mass spectrometric analysis of these stocks confirmed this result (data not shown). In additional studies (Fig 4Down), compound A was added to VSMCs in the presence of carbenoxolone to prevent completely the conversion of compound A to compound B. Compound A upregulated Ang II binding as effectively in the presence of carbenoxolone as in its absence. Compound B was added to VSMCs in the presence of carbenoxolone to prevent the small amount of conversion of compound B to compound A (Fig 4Down). Upregulation was similar in the presence and absence of carbenoxolone. Carbenoxolone alone (1 µmol/L) did not alter Ang II binding (97±3% of control, n=4). Scatchard analysis of complete competition binding data from control cells and cells treated for 24 hours with 1 µmol/L carbenoxolone and 1 µmol/L compound A revealed parallel lines (Fig 5Down), suggesting that compound A increased Ang II surface receptor number without altering binding affinity. Finally, 100 µmol/L losartan was as effective as 100 nmol/L unlabeled Ang II in displacing 125I–Ang II from VSMCs treated for 24 hours with 1 µmol/L carbenoxolone and 1 µmol/L compound A (7523±411 cpm per well [no competitors] versus 2043±123 cpm per well [Ang II] versus 2185±277 cpm per well [losartan], n=16). These data, which are similar to those involving VSMCs treated with aldosterone,13 suggest that Ang II receptors upregulated by compound A (as well as basal Ang II receptors) are of the AT1 subtype.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of carbenoxolone (Carb) on upregulation of angiotensin II (Ang II) binding by compound A (CompA) and compound B (CompB) in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Confluent VSMCs were incubated with CompA or CompB with or without 1 µmol/L Carb for 24 hours, and then Ang II binding was performed. The 100% value represents binding in the presence of vehicle only. Binding after exposure to CompA was not different from binding after exposure to CompA and Carb, and binding after exposure to CompB was not different from binding after exposure to CompB and Carb (n=4).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Scatchard analysis of angiotensin II (Ang II) binding data in compound A (CompA)–treated cells. Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) were treated with vehicle or 1 µmol/L CompA and 1 µmol/L carbenoxolone (Carb) for 24 hours. Full Ang II competition binding studies were performed for Scatchard analysis. This figure is representative of four studies.

Effects of Metabolites on Ang II Action
Since compound A, like unmetabolized glucocorticoids, upregulates Ang II receptors in VSMCs (Figs 3Up and 4Up), studies were performed to determine if compound A simulates glucocorticoids in other ways, ie, by inhibition of VSMC growth31 32 and potentiation of Ang II–stimulated action. Fig 6Down demonstrates that incubation of VSMCs for 24 hours with compound B or A results in concentration-dependent decreases in thymidine incorporation. In separate experiments, we demonstrated that these effects are mediated through the glucocorticoid receptor, in that reductions in thymidine incorporation by 100 nmol/L compound A (to 72±6% of control) or 100 nmol/L compound B (to 46±8% of control) were prevented by 1 µmol/L RU38486 (90±5% of control and 98±4% of control, respectively) (n=4). When 1 µmol/L carbenoxolone was included with compound A, inhibition was reduced but still significant (Fig 6Down). Carbenoxolone did not alter compound B–mediated decreases in thymidine incorporation (Fig 6Down).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Inhibition of thymidine incorporation by compound A (CompA) and compound B (CompB) in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). VSMCs grown to subconfluence in 10% newborn calf serum were exposed to CompA or CompB with or without 1 µmol/L carbenoxolone (Carb) for 24 hours. [3H]Thymidine was added for 5 hours, and thymidine incorporation was determined. The 100% value represents incorporation in the presence of vehicle only. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with the Student-Newman-Keuls test for comparison of main effects of the treatments (n=4). Incorporation after exposure to CompB was not different from incorporation after exposure to CompA, and incorporation after exposure to CompB was not different from incorporation after exposure to CompB and Carb. *Difference (P<.01) from CompA. **Difference (P<.01) from vehicle.

In previous studies, we observed that incubation of VSMCs with the mineralocorticoid aldosterone resulted in upregulation of Ang II receptor number and proportional enhancement of Ang II–stimulated inositol phosphate formation.12 13 In the present study, enhancement of Ang II–stimulated inositol phosphate formation by compounds B and A, corticosteroids that also upregulate Ang II receptors (Fig 3Up), was compared. Fig 7Down demonstrates that Ang II–stimulated inositol phosphate formation was more than doubled if 1 µmol/L compound B was added to the cells for 24 hours before Ang II stimulation. Compound A also enhanced Ang II–stimulated inositol phosphate formation, but the enhancement was less than that effected by compound B. Enhancement by compound A persisted in the presence of carbenoxolone, and carbenoxolone did not further enhance the compound B effect.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Enhancement of angiotensin II (Ang II)–stimulated inositol phosphate formation by compound A and compound B in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Confluent VSMCs were loaded with [3H]myoinositol for 24 hours and then 1 µmol/L compound A or 1 µmol/L compound B or vehicle for an additional 24 hours. In certain plates, carbenoxolone (Carb, 1 µmol/L) was included. Ang II stimulation consisted of 100 nmol/L for 30 seconds. Data in each bar represent total inositol phosphates after Ang II stimulation minus basal total inositol phosphates. Because of variability in Ang II–stimulated inositol phosphate responses from cell line to cell line, means were compared by paired t test (ie, from vehicle [Veh]- and steroid-treated wells on the same plate) (n=4-8). A indicates compound A; B, compound B.

Finally, the effects of compounds B and A on Ang II–stimulated vasoconstriction were determined (Fig 8Down). Aortic rings were incubated ex vivo with 500 nmol/L compound B, 500 nmol/L compound A, or vehicle for 24 hours, and then contraction was stimulated with Ang II or KCl. The technique of maintaining blood vessels ex vivo has been described previously.33 34 Peak stimulated tension in response to KCl was not different between any of the groups (data not shown). However, peak tension in response to Ang II was significantly greater in compound B–treated rings (0.74±0.06 g/mg dry wt) than in control rings (0.55±0.06 g/mg dry wt). Ang II contractions in compound A–treated rings were numerically greater than those in control rings (0.66±0.05 g/mg dry wt [compound A] versus 0.59±0.05 g/mg dry wt [vehicle]), but this difference did not reach statistical significance.



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Effects of compound A and compound B on Ang II–stimulated vascular contraction. Aortic rings (n=10) were exposed ex vivo to vehicle (Veh) or 500 nmol/L compound A or 500 nmol/L compound B for 24 hours, and contractions to 100 nmol/L Ang II were measured. Means were compared by paired t test. A indicates compound A; B, compound B.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Glucocorticoids are metabolized predominantly in the liver. The majority of urinary metabolites of compound B are formed on reduction of the double bond between carbons 4 and 5 (by 5ß-reductase) and reduction of the double bond in the keto group at carbon 3 (by 3{alpha}-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase). The resulting compounds are inactive. The 6ß-hydroxylase product of compound B, 6ß-hydroxycorticosterone, though a minor hepatic metabolite, is of interest, since it is the agonist for type IV corticosteroid receptors.19 This receptor subtype, recently described in a renal epithelial cell line, is distinct from other corticosteroid receptors and mediates sodium transport. The results of the present study demonstrate that vascular tissue does not convert compound B to 6ß-hydroxycorticosterone (Fig 1Up). In states of glucocorticoid excess, the major pathways of compound B metabolism may become saturated, and 6ß-hydroxycorticosterone formation may rise. Although some of the compound may reach the vasculature, our results demonstrate that VSMCs do not respond to 6ß-hydroxycorticosterone with upregulation of Ang II receptors (Fig 3Up). Although steroid binding analysis was not performed, it is most likely that VSMCs do not contain type IV corticosteroid receptors. Fig 1Up also demonstrates that compound B was not converted to aldosterone. Although it is generally felt that aldosterone biosynthesis occurs only in the adrenal cortex, a recent report has demonstrated the presence of the mRNA for P-450c11, the key mitochondrial enzyme responsible for aldosterone biosynthesis, in cultured VSMCs.29 Production of aldosterone by vascular tissue may be below the levels of detection by thin-layer chromatography.

11ßOHSD is responsible for extrahepatic metabolism of compound B; more 11ßOHSD is found in the kidney than in the liver. 11ßOHSD, in fact, contains two enzyme activities: a dehydrogenase that converts compound B to compound A and an oxoreductase that converts compound A to compound B. Activity in the kidney appears to favor the dehydrogenase for glucocorticoid inactivation, as discussed by Funder et al.20 Similarly, neither isolated toad bladders22 nor freshly isolated rabbit cortical collecting duct cells35 were able to convert compound A to compound B. The nearly complete conversion of compound B to compound A by the kidney allowed us to isolate [3H]compound A, which is not available commercially, in our laboratory. A number of recent studies have demonstrated the presence of 11ßOHSD in vascular tissue as well.23 24 25 The dominant enzyme activity in vascular smooth muscle, however, is controversial. Homogenates of rat aorta and mesenteric artery converted 20% to 30% of compound B to compound A, whereas activity in the reverse direction was nil.23 It should be noted that the 20% to 30% conversion of compound B to compound A is of a magnitude similar to the conversion in the present study (Fig 1Up). In contrast, we (Fig 2Up) and others25 report greater conversion of compound A to compound B than of compound B to compound A by freshly isolated aorta and cultured VSMCs. Reasons for this discrepancy are unclear but may relate to differences between intact tissues and broken cell preparations.

In a seminal observation by Funder et al,20 it was suggested that compound A is inactive in renal tissue, since compound A bound to glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptors with 1/300 the affinity of dexamethasone and aldosterone, respectively. It was postulated that inactivation of vast concentrations of glucocorticoids by 11ßOHSD allows smaller concentrations of mineralocorticoids to access mineralocorticoid receptors. However, compound A may not be inactive in renal tissue. In adrenalectomized rats, compound A was found to be a more potent stimulator of sodium reabsorption than compound B,21 and compound A was a more potent inhibitor of aldosterone-stimulated short-circuit currents than compound B.22

The present study extends this controversy to vascular tissue, and the results suggest that compound A possesses significant glucocorticoid agonist properties. Exposure of VSMCs to compound A resulted in concentration-dependent upregulation of Ang II binding (Fig 3Up). The results from the competition studies and Scatchard analysis imply that compound A upregulates Ang II receptor number without change in binding affinity (Fig 5Up). Compound A appears to bind to type II (glucocorticoid) receptors, since the specific type II corticoid receptor antagonist RU38486 completely inhibited Ang II receptor upregulation by compound A (Fig 3Up), by the natural glucocorticoid compound B (Fig 3Up), and by the selective synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone.13 The enhancement of Ang II–stimulated inositol phosphate formation (Fig 7Up) suggests that the upregulated Ang II receptors are coupled to more distal aspects of the Ang II signal transduction pathway. Ang II receptor upregulation and proportional increases in Ang II–stimulated inositol phosphate formation after exposure of VSMCs to the mineralocorticoid aldosterone have been demonstrated previously.12 13 An additional glucocorticoid property, inhibition of VSMC growth,31 32 was displayed by compound A (Fig 6Up).

Because conversion of compound A to compound B by cultured VSMCs is substantial (Fig 2Up) and because compound B is a potent upregulator of Ang II receptor binding in its own right (Fig 3Up), compound A itself may not have caused the glucocorticoid actions. The addition of the 11ßOHSD inhibitor carbenoxolone, which blocked all interconversion (Fig 2Up), allowed direct comparison of the glucocorticoid effects of compound A and compound B. Upregulation of Ang II binding, enhancement of Ang II–stimulated inositol phosphate formation, and inhibition of VSMC growth by compound A persisted even in the presence of carbenoxolone (Figs 3Up, 6Up, and 7Up). The use of carbenoxolone allowed us to determine that compound A was 40% to 50% weaker in all glucocorticoid effects compared with compound B. We also considered the possibility that the addition of carbenoxolone to compound B might potentiate its glucocorticoid properties by preventing the small amount of conversion to compound A (a somewhat weaker glucocorticoid). However, this was not the case, because upregulation of Ang II binding, enhancement of Ang II–stimulated inositol phosphate formation, and inhibition of VSMC growth by compound B were not affected by the addition of carbenoxolone. It is likely that the small (10%) reduction in the compound B content and the intrinsic activity of compound A explain this lack of effect.

Exposure of aortic rings ex vivo to compound B for 24 hours resulted in greater contraction to 1 µmol/L Ang II than did exposure to vehicle, whereas exposure to compound A elicited contractions to 1 µmol/L Ang II that were numerically but not statistically greater than those in rings exposed to vehicle (Fig 8Up). Exposure to corticosteroids was performed in this isolated setting to study their direct effects and to avoid the influence of systemic perturbations. Enhanced vasoconstriction to {alpha}-adrenergic agonists and Ang II has been demonstrated in vessels removed from animals after glucocorticoid or mineralocorticoid treatment in vivo.4 5 6 7 8 It is possible that compound A would have increased the potency of Ang II contractions (ie, lower EC50) more significantly than it increased contractions at maximal (1 µmol/L) Ang II concentrations. However, such studies are based on cumulative contractions—contractions to a set of increasing concentrations of vasoconstrictor, each added when the contraction to the previous concentration has plateaued. Such studies are impossible with Ang II, whose contractions do not plateau but abate spontaneously and become desensitized to subsequent Ang II exposure.36 We did not examine the effects of compound A per se by including carbenoxolone with compound A in the overnight incubation, because it has been suggested that carbenoxolone is vasoactive in its own right.37

Results from the present study argue against the role of blood vessels as a mineralocorticoid target tissue, despite the presence of 11ßOHSD in vascular smooth muscle. Since only 25% to 30% of circulating compound B is metabolized by vascular smooth muscle, the large excess of glucocorticoid over mineralocorticoid would not be overcome. This is in contrast to the kidney, which contains much greater amounts of 11ßOHSD and can metabolize almost all glucocorticoids. In addition, compound A, the product of compound B metabolism by 11ßOHSD, is not inactive in vascular smooth muscle but is as potent in upregulating Ang II receptor function as aldosterone. Furthermore, much of the compound A gaining access to the circulation after genesis in the liver and kidney would be converted within vascular smooth muscle to compound B as a result of the predominant oxoreductase moiety of 11ßOHSD. Only if a disease state were characterized by a massive excess of circulating mineralocorticoid would mineralocorticoids be able to compete with glucocorticoids for access to mineralocorticoid receptors in vascular smooth muscle. Such a scenario may occur in animal models of mineralocorticoid hypertension, whereas plasma aldosterone levels are only elevated 5- to 10-fold in human primary or secondary hyperaldosteronism.

Although carbenoxolone did not enhance the effects of compound B in our in vitro experiments (Figs 3Up, 6Up, and 7Up), carbenoxolone may enhance glucocorticoid action in vivo. Treatment of normal humans for 7 days with carbenoxolone resulted in greater pressor responses to intravenous norepinephrine and greater forearm blood flow reduction to intra-arterial norepinephrine than did control treatment.38 In the absence of carbenoxolone, the moderate degree (25% to 30%) of conversion of compound B to the less active compound A by 11ßOHSD in vascular tissue may limit potentiation of pressor hormone action. In the presence of carbenoxolone, which maintains compound B in the unmetabolized state, potentiation of pressor hormone action can be full. Although the anti–peptic ulcer drug carbenoxolone is no longer in common usage, licorice and chewing tobacco contain related 11ßOHSD inhibitors such as glycyrrhizic acid. Hypertension from such exposure continues to be seen in clinical practice.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by the American Heart Association, South Carolina Affiliate, Inc, and by biomedical research support grants from the Medical University of South Carolina. Expert technical assistance was provided by Jana J. Fine. The authors thank Lois B. McKamey for secretarial support. Mass spectrometric data were kindly obtained by Dr Kevin L. Schey at the Medical University of South Carolina Mass Spectrometry Research Resource Facility.


*    Footnotes
 
Reprint requests to Dr Michael E. Ullian, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Clinical Sciences Bldg 829, 171 Ashley Ave, Charleston, SC 29425.

Previously presented in part in abstract form at the annual meeting of the American Society of Nephrology, Orlando, Fla, October 26-29, 1994.

Received January 12, 1995; accepted June 6, 1995.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Handa M, Kondo K, Suzuki H, Saruta T. Dexamethasone hypertension in rats: role of prostaglandins and pressor sensitivity to norepinephrine. Hypertension. 1984;6:236-241. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Grunfeld JP, Eloy L. Glucocorticoids modulate vascular reactivity in the rat. Hypertension. 1987;10:608-618. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Pirpiris M, Sudhir K, Yeung S, Jennings G, Whitworth JA. Pressor responsiveness in corticosteroid-induced hypertension in humans. Hypertension. 1992;19:567-574. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Couture R, Regoli D. Vascular reactivity to angiotensin and noradrenaline in rats maintained on a sodium free diet or made hypertensive with desoxycorticosterone acetate and salt. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1980;2:25-43.

5. Longhurst PA, Rice PJ, Taylor DA, Fleming WW. Sensitivity of caudal arteries and the mesenteric vascular bed to norepinephrine in DOCA-salt hypertension. Hypertension. 1988;12:133-142. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Perry PA, Webb RC. Agonist-sensitive calcium stores in arteries from steroid hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1991;17:603-611. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Storm DS, Webb RC. {alpha}-Adrenergic receptors and 45Ca2+ efflux in arteries from deoxycorticosterone acetate hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1992;19:734-738. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Monney M, Schlegel PA, Brunner HR. Influence of sodium diet and deoxycorticosterone on the response to norepinephrine, lysine-vasopressin and angiotensin II of isolated perfused rat mesenteric arteries. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1983;A5:1735-1747.

9. Schiffrin EL, Thomé FS, Genest J. Vascular angiotensin II receptors in renal and DOCA-salt hypertensive rats. Hypertension. 1983;5(suppl V):V-16-V-21.

10. Schiffrin EL, Gutkowska J, Genest J. Effect of angiotensin II and deoxycorticosterone infusion on vascular angiotensin II receptors in rats. Am J Physiol. 1984;246:H608-H614. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Schiffrin EL, Franks DJ, Gutkowska J. Effect of aldosterone on vascular angiotensin II receptors in the rat. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1985;63:1522-1527. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Ullian ME, Schelling JR, Linas SL. Aldosterone enhances angiotensin II receptor binding and inositol phosphate responses. Hypertension. 1992;20:67-73. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Ullian ME, Fine JJ. Mechanisms of enhanced angiotensin II-stimulated signal transduction in vascular smooth muscle by aldosterone. J Cell Physiol. 1994;161:201-208. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Myers WJ, Nichols NR. Mineralocorticoid binding in cultured smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts from rat aorta. J Steroid Biochem. 1981;14:1157-1168. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Kornel L, Ramsay C, Kanamarlapudi N, Travers T, Packer W. Evidence for the presence in arterial walls of intracellular-molecular mechanism for action of mineralocorticoids. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1982;A4:1561-1582.

16. Scott BA, Lawrence B, Nguyen HH, Meyer WJ. Aldosterone and dexamethasone binding in human arterial smooth muscle cells. J Hypertens. 1987;5:739-744. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Sato A, Suzuki H, Murakami M, Nakazato Y, Awaita Y, Saruta T. Glucocorticoid increases angiotensin II type I receptor and its gene expression. Hypertension. 1994;23:25-30. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Schelling JR, DeLuca DJ, Konieczkowski M, Marzec R, Sedor JR, Dubyak GR, Linas SL. Glucocorticoid uncoupling of angiotensin II-dependent phospholipase C activation in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Kidney Int. 1994;46:675-682. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Duncan RL, Grogan WM, Kramer LB, Watlington CO. Corticosterone's metabolite is an agonist for Na+ transport stimulation in A6 cells. Am J Physiol. 1988;255:F736-F748. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Funder JW, Pearce PT, Smith R, Smith AI. Mineralocorticoid action: target tissue specificity is enzyme, not receptor, mediated. Science. 1988;242:583-585. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Souness GW, Morris DJ. 11-Dehydrocorticosterone in the presence of carbenoxolone is a more potent sodium retainer than corticosterone. Steroids. 1993;58:24-28.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Brem AS, Matheson KL, Barnes JL, Morris DJ. 11-Dehydrocorticosterone, a glucocorticoid metabolite, inhibits aldosterone action in toad bladder. Am J Physiol. 1991;261:F873-F879. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Walker BR, Yau JL, Brett LP, Seckl JR, Monder C, Williams BC, Edwards CR. 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in vascular smooth muscle and heart: implications for cardiovascular responses to glucocorticoids. Endocrinology. 1991;129:3305-3312. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Funder JW, Pearce PT, Smith R, Campbell J. Vascular type I aldosterone binding sites are physiological mineralocorticoid receptors. Endocrinology. 1989;125:2224-2226. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Brem AS, Bina RB, King T, Morris DJ. Bidirectional activity of 11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase in vascular smooth muscle cells. Steroids. In press.

26. Ullian ME, Hutchison FN, Hazen-Martin DJ, Morinelli TA. Angiotensin II-aldosterone interactions on protein synthesis in vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:C1525-C1531. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Ullian ME, Linas SL. Role of receptor cycling in the regulation of angiotensin II surface receptor number and angiotensin II uptake in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. J Clin Invest. 1989;84:840-846.

28. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265-275. [Free Full Text]

29. Hatakeyama H, Miyamori I, Fujita T, Takeda Y, Takeda R, Yamamoto H. Vascular aldosterone: biosynthesis and a link to angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy of vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:24316-24320. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Chrousos GP, Laue L, Nieman LK, Kawai S, Udelsman RU, Brandon DD, Loriaux DL. Glucocorticoids and glucocorticoid antagonists: lessons from RU486. Kidney Int. 1988;34:S-18-S-23.

31. Longenecker JP, Kilty LA, Johnson LK. Glucocorticoid influence on growth of vascular wall cells in culture. J Cell Physiol. 1982;113:197-202. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Longenecker JP, Kilty LA, Johnson LK. Glucocorticoid inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation: influence of homologous extracellular matrix and serum mitogens. J Cell Biol. 1984;98:534-540. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Todd ME, Friedman SM. The rat-tail artery maintained in culture: an experimental model. In Vitro. 1978;14:757-770. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Merrilees MJ, Scott L. Organ culture of rat carotid artery: maintenance of morphological characteristics and of pattern of matrix synthesis. In Vitro. 1982;18:900-910. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

35. Naray-Fejes-Toth A, Watlington CO, Fejes-Toth G. 11ß-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity in the renal target cells of aldosterone. Endocrinology. 1991;129:17-21. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Lin L, Nasjletti A. Role of endothelium-derived prostanoid in angiotensin-induced vasoconstriction. Hypertension. 1991;18:158-164. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Walker BR, Sang KS, Williams BC, Edwards CR. Direct and indirect effects of carbenoxolone on responses to glucocorticoids and noradrenaline in rat aorta. J Hypertens. 1994;12:33-39. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Walker BR, Connacher AA, Webb DJ, Edwards CR. Glucocorticoids and blood pressure: a role for the cortisol/cortisone shuttle in the control of vascular tone in man. Clin Sci. 1992;83:171-178.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
A. Serra, D. E. Uehlinger, P. Ferrari, B. Dick, B. M. Frey, F. J. Frey, and B. Vogt
Glycyrrhetinic Acid Decreases Plasma Potassium Concentrations in Patients with Anuria
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2002; 13(1): 191 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M. E Ullian
The role of corticosteroids in the regulation of vascular tone
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 1999; 41(1): 55 - 64.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
D. J. Morris, Y. H. Lo, W. R. Lichtfield, and G. H. Williams
Impact of Dietary Na+ on Glycyrrhetinic Acid-Like Factors (Kidney 11{beta}-(HSD2)-GALFs) in Human Essential Hypertension
Hypertension, January 1, 1998; 31(1): 469 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
A. S. Brem, R. B. Bina, T. King, and D. J. Morris
11{beta}OH-Progesterone Affects Vascular Glucocorticoid Metabolism and Contractile Response
Hypertension, September 1, 1997; 30(3): 449 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. E. Smith, K. X. Z. Li, R. K. Andrews, and Z. Krozowski
Immunohistochemical and Molecular Characterization of the Rat 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type II Enzyme
Endocrinology, February 1, 1997; 138(2): 540 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
Y. H. Lo, M. F. Sheff, S. A. Latif, C. Ribeiro, H. Silver, A. S. Brem, and D. J. Morris
Kidney 11{beta}-HSD2 Is Inhibited by Glycyrrhetinic Acid-Like Factors in Human Urine
Hypertension, January 1, 1997; 29(1): 500 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ullian, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ullian, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Walsh, L. G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH