Articles |
From the Departments of Anatomy and Cellular Biology (M.S.F.C., K.M., P.L.M.) and Pharmacology and Toxicology (R.W.C., H.C.), The Medical College of Georgia, Augusta.
Correspondence to Dr Paul L. McNeil, Department of Anatomy and Cellular Biology, The Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912-2000.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: fibroblast growth factor myocardium cell injury plasma membrane heart hypertrophy
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have recently shown that during normal contractile activity in vivo skeletal myofibers suffer transient disruptions or "wounds" of their plasma membranes and that the frequency of such wounding is greatly increased by eccentric exercise-induced contractions.8 We found that such wounded myofibers contain less basic FGF (bFGF) in their cytoplasm than do uninjured myofibers,9 suggesting that contraction-induced fiber wounding results in bFGF release. On the basis of these and numerous other findings (summarized in Reference 1010 ), we postulate that mechanically induced transient disruptions of the plasma membrane provide a route for FGF release. This mechanism, termed the "wound hormone hypothesis," can explain how, in vivo, proteins such as acidic FGF (aFGF) and bFGF are exported despite the lack of a classic signal peptide sequence,11 which is thought to be required for secretion via the exocytotic pathway.
The heart, like skeletal muscle, is a mechanically active tissue composed of FGF-responsive and FGF-producing cells.12 13 14 However, to date, there have been no studies linking the placement of mechanical stress on cardiac myocytes or myocardium with the release of FGF or studies that provide a mechanistic basis for FGF release. In the present study, we have asked the following questions that are raised when one applies the wound hormone hypothesis to the heart. First, do cardiac myocytes suffer plasma membrane wounds in the normal heart in vivo? Second, if so, does the frequency of wounding increase following the imposition on the heart of additional mechanical load? Third, is FGF released from the mechanically active (eg, beating) heart? Fourth, do the rate and force of contraction influence the amount of FGF released from the heart?
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Detection of Cardiac Myocyte Wounding in the Rat Heart In Vivo
Sprague-Dawley rats (male, 200 to 250 g) were deeply
anesthetized (50 mg/kg IP pentobarbital) and monitored from lead II of
the ECG. Heart rate was recorded before and after administration of 0.5
µg/kg isoproterenol or vehicle alone via the femoral vein. After a
period of 20 minutes, the dorsal aorta was cannulated, the vena cava
was cut to allow efficient flow of perfusate, and then the heart was
back-perfused through the coronary vasculature with 150 mL warm
Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS, pH 7.2) containing 0.1%
procaine at a perfusion rate of 10 mL/min. This was followed by
perfusion with 60 mL DPBS containing 8% freshly generated
paraformaldehyde. Surrounded with fixative-soaked cotton swabs to
prevent drying, the heart was left in place for 60 minutes. The heart
was then carefully excised from the animal and placed in fresh fixative
for a further 24 hours. Heart tissue was processed for frozen
sectioning and serum albumin immunostaining as previously
described.9 All procedures involving animal
experimentation were in accordance with institutional guidelines.
Quantification of Cardiac Myocyte Wounding In Vivo
Control and isoproterenol-stimulated hearts were mounted side by
side on a sectioning stub so that the apex of each heart was at the
same level. The tissue block was trimmed to a depth of 8000 µm from
the apex of the hearts, and 5-µm frozen sections were collected at
random to a depth of 12 000 µm from the apex by using a Zeiss HM 500
cryostat microtome. Sections were then stained for the presence of
cytoplasmic serum albumin as previously described.9
Quantification of cardiac myocyte immunostaining intensity was carried
out by using an Image 1 (Universal Imaging Corp) image analysis
system. The methods for random acquisition of digitized transmitted
light images of muscle sections, for delimiting a cytoplasmic portion
of the myocyte for analysis, and for quantitatively analyzing the
data thus generated were essentially as previously
described.9 A total of
7300 individual cardiac
myocytes, obtained from three separate experiments, were analyzed in
this manner. The number of wounded myocytes present in the left
ventricular wall of control and isoproterenol-stimulated hearts was
expressed as a percentage of the total myocyte population per condition
analyzed.
Immunoelectron Microscopy
Left ventricle tissue from perfusion-fixed hearts was cut into
5-mm3 pieces and dehydrated in ethanol. Tissue was then
incubated overnight in LR-White acrylic resin (EM Services), followed
by polymerization at 60°C for 2 hours. Sections (3 µm) were cut for
light microscopy by using an Ultracut E ultramicrotome (Reichert
Scientific Instruments) and stained for the presence of serum albumin
as above, except that primary antibody binding was detected with a
biotinylated rabbit anti-goat secondary antibody that was disclosed by
using streptavidin (10 nm)gold (Auroprobe EM kit, Amersham) followed
by silver enhancement (Intense Silver Enhancement kit, Amersham). For
electron microscopy, ultrathin sections (70 nm) were cut and mounted on
a nickel grid coated with a Formvar (Monsanto Co) membrane. Sections
were stained by using the immunogold protocol described above and
incubated overnight in sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) containing 1%
osmium tetroxide. Sections were viewed with a Zeiss EM902 electron
microscope after staining with uranyl acetate and lead citrate.
Detection of FGF Release From the Rat Langendorff Preparation
Sprague-Dawley rats (male, 200 to 250 g) were
decapitated, and the heart was immediately removed from the animal and
placed in cold Chenoweth-Koelle buffer. Excess tissue was trimmed from
the preparation, and the heart was back-perfused through the aorta
with warm Chenoweth-Koelle buffer (37°C) as previously
described15 at a flow rate of 8 mL/min. This procedure was
performed within 4 minutes of removing the heart from the animal. After
a 20-minute equilibration period, the isolated heart had achieved a
steady heart rate (
260 beats per minute), and the experiment could
begin. Perfusate was collected for a period of 40 minutes in a
reservoir maintained at 4°C in the presence of 5 µg/mL aprotinin, 5
µg/mL leupeptin, 1 µg/mL pepstatin, and 1 mmol/L
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The perfusate was collected and was
pumped through a 1-mL Hi-Trap heparin-Sepharose column (Pharmacia), and
the column was then washed with
1000 column bed volumes of 50 mmol/L
Tris buffer (pH 7.2) at 4°C. Heparin binding proteins were eluted
from the column in a stepwise fashion by using 10 mL of 0.5 mol/L NaCl,
1.2 mol/L NaCl, and 2.0 mol/L NaCl made up in 50 mmol/L Tris buffer (pH
7.2). The column was washed with 10 mL of Tris buffer (pH 7.2) between
each salt wash. The column fractions were concentrated and desalted by
using ultrafiltration (10 000molecular weight cutoff filter, Amicon)
to a final volume of 200 µL and stored at -70°C until FGF
analysis. Fractions destined for assessment of growth-promoting
activity were dialyzed by using ultrafiltration against serum-free DMEM
to a final volume of 200 µL.
Detection of FGF by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Aliquots (50 µL) of concentrated column fractions were
dispensed into Immulon 96-well microtiter plates (Dynatech
Laboratories) and incubated overnight at 37°C. The plates were washed
with three changes of calcium- and magnesium-free PBS (pH 7.2)
containing 0.05% Tween 20 (wash buffer) over a 20-minute period. Each
well was blocked with wash buffer containing 3% bovine serum albumin
(BSA) for a period of 30 minutes at 37°C. Blocking solution was
removed and replaced with primary antibody solution (CR2 or RD 1, both
used at 2.5 µg IgG per milliliter of blocking solution) and incubated
for a further 2 hours at 37°C. The plates were washed with three
changes of wash buffer over a 20-minute period, and primary antibody
was detected by using a peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit biotinylated
antibody kit (Vector Laboratories) and phenylenediamine dihydrochloride
as a substrate. The reaction was halted by the addition of 2 mol/L
sulfuric acid, and the absorbance was measured at 490 nm with a plate
reader (Cambridge Technology, Inc). The amount of FGF detected in each
column fraction was determined by comparison with a standard curve
constructed on the same plate by using purified human recombinant aFGF
and bFGF.
Growth Assay
BRME cells were plated in 2% FCS-DMEM containing standard
antibiotics at a cell density of 2500 cells per well in 24-well plates.
Cells were allowed to attach for 16 hours, and the medium was replaced
with 0.5 mL of fresh 2% FCS-DMEM alone or 2% FCS-DMEM containing one
of the following: recombinant aFGF (25 ng/mL), recombinant bFGF (5
ng/mL), 50 µL of concentrated 1.2 mol/L NaCl column fraction
previously dialyzed against serum-free DMEM, and the above mitogens
plus 10 µg IgG per milliliter of CR1. Cells were grown for a further
48 hours, after which time cell number was assayed by using a
previously described method.16
Two-Dimensional SDS-PAGE and Immunoblotting
A concentrated desalted 1.2 mol/L NaCl column fraction (100
µL) was mixed with 20 ng bFGF, lyophilized, dissolved in sample
buffer (0.1% Nonidet P-40 [vol/vol], 1% [wt/vol] dithiothreitol
[DTT], and 10% [vol/vol] glycerol in distilled water), and boiled
for 5 minutes. bFGF alone (20 ng) was treated in a similar manner.
Samples were then separated on a pH 3 to 10 isoelectric focusing (IEF)
gel (NOVEX) for a period of 2 hours at 100 V, followed by focusing for
a further 3 hours at 200 V. The IEF gel was cut into vertical strips
and equilibrated in 0.015 mol/L Tris buffer (pH 6.8) containing 3%
(wt/vol) SDS and 10% (vol/vol) glycerol for 2 minutes with gentle
agitation. Focused proteins were then separated on 15% SDS-PAGE gels
and transferred onto 0.2-µm supported nitrocellulose membranes by
using a method previously described.17 Immunoblots were
blocked with Tris-buffered saline (TBS, pH 7.2) containing 4% BSA and
0.05% Tween 20 for 2 hours and probed for the presence of aFGF or bFGF
by using a mixture of the anti-aFGF (RD 1) and anti-bFGF (CR2) primary
antibodies described above (both used at 2.5 µg IgG per milliliter in
TBS containing 2% BSA and 0.05% Tween 20, pH 7.4) for 2 hours at room
temperature. Primary antibody binding was detected with an alkaline
phosphataseconjugated secondary antibody ABC kit as previously
described.9 The pI and molecular weight coordinates for
any proteins disclosed by immunoblotting were calculated by comparison
with IEF standards and molecular weight standards (BioRad) run in
parallel with the samples on the relevant gels.
Measurement of Isoproterenol-Stimulated FGF Release
Langendorff preparations were prepared as detailed above and
allowed to equilibrate over a period of 20 minutes. After this time, a
50-mL aliquot of perfusate was collected and mixed with a
heparin-Sepharose slurry in the presence of protease inhibitors at
4°C. The heart was then stimulated with 10-7 mol/L
isoproterenol for a period of 5 minutes to induce an increase in both
heart rate and force of contraction. A second 50-mL aliquot of
perfusate from the stimulated heart was then collected and mixed with
the heparin-Sepharose slurry. After a period of 4 hours, the
heparin-Sepharose was collected by centrifugation and washed with 100
mL of 0.5 mol/L NaCl, followed by 100 mL of 50 mmol/L Tris buffer (pH
7.2), to remove the nonFGF-inhibitable activity detected in the 0.5
mol/L NaCl wash by heparin-Sepharose affinity chromatography. The
heparin-Sepharose was then washed with 2 mL of 1.2 mol/L NaCl to elute
any bound FGF, and this fraction was then concentrated and desalted by
using ultrafiltration to a final volume of 200 µL as described above.
The amount of FGF detected in equal amounts of concentrated perfusate,
collected before and after stimulation with isoproterenol, was
determined by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) protocol
described above.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
40%) and force of contraction (
50%) but
not arrhythmia or disruption of electrical conductance,18
caused a highly significant (P<.001) approximately
threefold increase in the proportion of wounded cardiac myocytes (Fig 2
|
|
|
Detection of FGF in the Perfusate of an Ex Vivo Beating Rat
Heart
To determine whether FGF is released from the beating heart,
perfusate from the Langendorff preparation was collected and passed
over a heparin-Sepharose column as illustrated in Fig 4A
. Heparin-binding proteins were eluted with buffer
containing 0.5, 1.2, and 2.0 mol/L of NaCl, desalted, concentrated, and
assayed by ELISA for the presence of FGF. Fig 4B
illustrates the
results obtained from a representative experiment using the CR2
antibody, which recognizes human recombinant bFGF. Primary antibody
binding was detected in both the 0.5 and 1.2 mol/L NaCl column
fractions. However, unlike the activity detected in the 1.2 mol/L NaCl
fraction, the immunoreactivity detected in the 0.5 mol/L NaCl fraction
could not be inhibited with 40-mol/L excess of bFGF, indicating that
the activity detected in this but not the 1.2 mol/L NaCl fraction was
due to nonspecific primary antibody binding. Similar results were
obtained when using the RD 1 antibody, which recognizes human
recombinant aFGF (data not shown). These data indicate that
heparin-binding molecules, which could be eluted with 1.2 mol/L NaCl
and had the immunoreactivity of both aFGF and bFGF, are released from
the beating heart.
|
Biological Activity of the 1.2 mol/L NaCl Fraction Obtained From
the Heart Perfusate
The FGF-like activity detected in the 1.2 mol/L NaCl
heparin-Sepharose column fraction was tested for its ability to induce
BRME proliferation.19 A significant increase over control
values in absorbance (the measure in this assay of cell number) was
observed when BRME cells were grown in medium containing aFGF (25
ng/mL) and bFGF (5 ng/mL), respectively (Fig 5
). This
increase was significantly reduced when cells were grown in the
presence of 10 µg/mL of the FGF-neutralizing antibody CR1 (Fig 5
).
The FGF-like activity present in the 1.2 mol/L NaCl column fraction
also significantly increased absorbance from control values. This 1.2
mol/L fraction growth-promoting activity was abolished by the presence
of 10 µg/mL of the FGF-neutralizing antibody CR1 (Fig 5
). These data
indicate that the 1.2 mol/L NaCl heparin-Sepharose column fraction
contains a molecule or molecules that have a characteristic biological
activity of aFGF or bFGF,18 namely, growth-promoting
activity for endothelial cells.
|
Identification of Heparin-Binding Molecules in the Heart
Perfusate
Human recombinant bFGF was separated by using two-dimensional
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane
was probed with a mixture of CR2 and RD 1 primary antibodies to detect
both aFGF and bFGF. As can be seen in Fig 6A
, human
recombinant bFGF contained two major isoforms with coordinates of
7.7, 17 kD (pI, Mr) and
8.5, 17 kD (pI,
Mr). When a mixture of the recombinant bFGF and
the lyophilized 1.2 mol/L NaCl fraction of the heart perfusate was
separated in a similar manner, two new proteins were detected on the
blot (Fig 6B
, arrows). These proteins had coordinates of
8.5, 15 kD
(pI, Mr) and
5.5, 15 kD (pI,
Mr), pI values very close to those previously
reported for bFGF and aFGF, respectively.20 Thus, our data
indicate that both bFGF and aFGF are released from the beating
heart.
|
Effect of Stimulated Contraction on FGF Release
We next asked whether, as predicted by the wound hormone
hypothesis, increased mechanical load placed on the heart results in
increased FGF release. The amount of FGF present in the heart
perfusate was measured before and after stimulation with the
ß-adrenergic agent isoproterenol. Initial experiments indicated that
placement of electrodes in the cardiac wall or a balloon catheter in
the left ventricle to measure changes in heart rate and force of
contraction, respectively, caused artifactual cardiac myocyte wounding
(data not shown). Therefore, we measured FGF release before and after
stimulation with 10-7 mol/L isoproterenol in unmonitored
hearts to avoid such artifactual wounding. The effect of
10-7 mol/L isoproterenol on the heart rate and force of
contraction in a monitored heart preparation is illustrated in Fig 7
,
left. Isoproterenol stimulated heart rate by 42% and
force of contraction (left ventricular dP/dt) by 46%. The data
presented in Fig 7
, right, indicate that isoproterenol stimulation
caused a significant increase (P<.01, paired t
test) in the amount of FGF released from the Langendorff
preparation.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4% to a postrunning level of
>28%.8
In the present study, we provide direct evidence that cell wounding
also occurs in the heart, that the cell type affected is the cardiac
myocyte, and that myocyte wounding is a frequently occurring event.
Approximately 25% of the myocytes examined in the normal rat heart had
suffered constitutive nonlethal plasma membrane disruptions (Fig 1
)
before organ perfusion. We are unable to temporally correlate this
basal level of cardiac myocyte wounding with any particular mechanical
stimuli, because the clearance of serum albumin from the cytoplasm of a
wounded muscle cell takes 24 to 48 hours.8 However, an
acute increase in rate and force of contraction in vivo, caused by
administration of the ß-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol, caused a
highly significant increase (3-fold over control levels) in the
frequency of cardiac myocyte wounding that occurred within the
20-minute period between isoproterenol injection and heart perfusion
(Fig 1
).
Several studies previous to ours had indicated that myocyte wounding might occur in the normal heart. For example, the cardiac-specific protein troponin I is readily detected in the blood of normal individuals.21 Additionally, cardiac-specific myosin heavy chain fragments, also detectable in the blood of normal individuals, increase in concentration twofold after exercise.22 23 Other cardiac-specific markers, eg, cardiac troponin T, are not detectable in normal blood24 : possibly troponin T is released from cells only after lethal injury, or possibly the assay used is insufficiently sensitive.25
How do cardiac myocytes survive and continue to function despite frequent disruptions of sarcolemma integrity? Crucial to any cell's ability to survive a plasma membrane disruption is the capacity for resealing. Most eukaryotic cells possess this capacity, as is demonstrated by their ability to survive microinjection and other mechanically based cell-loading techniques.26 Nevertheless, since serum albumin transiently enters the cytosolic compartment of the wounded cardiac myocyte, so too must ions such as Ca2+, Na+, and K+. The isoproterenol-stimulated heart continues to beat rhythmically and with increased force, suggesting that cardiac myocytes can withstand large, but transient, fluxes in cytoplasmic ion concentrations without permanent functional or electrical compromise. Highly efficient sarcolemma Ca2+- ATPase pumps27 and sarcolemma Na+-Ca2+-exchangers activated by elevated intracellular Na+28 may explain such a capacity. In addition, Ca2+-activated closure of gap junctions29 at the intercalated disk of the cardiac myocyte may constitute an evolutionary adaptation of this and other cell types to life in a mechanically injurious environment, since it would prevent Ca2+ poisoning of adjacent cardiac myocytes until membrane resealing had occurred. Finally, eukaryotic cells use a Ca2+-activated kinesin-based vesicular shuttle in resealing membrane disruptions.30 This mechanism delivers intracellular membrane to the site of plasma membrane disruption, where it is then added via exocytosis to the plasma membrane (K. Miyake and P.L. McNeil, unpublished data, 1994).
We chose an isoproterenol dose (0.5 µg/kg) sufficient for maximally increasing heart rate and force of contraction. Much higher (50 to 100 mg/kg) doses of this and other catecholamines cause gross damage to the myocardium.31 Proposed mechanisms explaining this cardiotoxicity include permeabilization of the cardiac myocyte plasma membrane.32 Indeed, such permeabilization was established in previous studies that used horseradish peroxidase as a wound marker, much as we have used serum albumin in the present study. Interestingly, these previous studies failed to reveal wounded myocytes in the normal heart.32 This discrepancy between our present work and this previous work probably reflects the greater sensitivity of our technique, which uses an endogenous marker, serum albumin, that is present at far higher concentration than can be achieved by using injected horseradish peroxidase.
FGF Release Into the Perfusate of the Contracting Heart
In the present study, we provide evidence from
heparin-Sepharose chromatography, ELISA, an endothelial growth assay
combined with antibody neutralization of growth-promoting activity, and
two-dimensional gel electrophoresis followed by Western blotting that
both aFGF and bFGF are present in heart perfusates. In addition
(data not shown), we detected immunoreactivity in the 1.2 mol/L
heparin-Sepharose eluate in Western blots and ELISA assays using a
total of five additional antibodies to FGF. Moreover, we show that
stimulation of heart rate and force of contraction with the
ß-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol results in an increase in the
amount of FGF released into the perfusate of the rat Langendorff
preparation. In a separate study, we have found that cultured cardiac
myocytes suffer plasma membrane disruptions and release bFGF at a
greater rate after the initiation of electrical pacing of contraction
(D. Kaye, D. Pimental, S. Prasad, T. Möki, H.J. Berger, P.L.
McNeil, R.A. Kelly, and T.W. Smith, unpublished data, 1994). When
cultures were subject to electrical pacing in the presence of the
contraction-inhibiting drug verapamil, cell wounding and FGF release
returned to levels characteristic of unpaced cells. All of these recent
results suggest that in the myocardium, as in skeletal
muscle,9 FGF release is stimulated by increased
contractile activity.
Injury-induced increases in the expression of bFGF mRNA and protein have been observed in several systems, including brain33 and cultured endothelial cells34 and, most interestingly, in the isoproterenol-injured35 and the transplanted36 37 38 heart. Moreover, exercise increases expression of bFGF in skeletal muscle.39 Thus, in addition to the possible growth-stimulatory role bFGF may play after its acute release upon injury, FGF may also play a longer term role in heart recovery from injury, facilitated by an increase in its expression. Wounding of cultured endothelial cells induces the expression of bFGF message and protein,34 suggesting that disruption of plasma membrane integrity may result both in enhanced release and production of bFGF.
The most likely source of the aFGF and bFGF released into the heart perfusate is the cardiac myocyte, since it is the cell type most strongly immunostained.10 11 13 40 Another potential source of FGF is extracellular matrix.41 However, immunostaining of heart tissue does not support this notion, although aFGF has been reported to be present in the extracellular matrix remaining after detergent lysis of cultures of cardiac myocytes.42 Finally, other cells of the myocardium, such as endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells, may produce these growth factors in heart and therefore cannot be ruled out as potential sources of FGF.
The Wound Hormone Hypothesis and Heart Hypertrophy
The signaling mechanism that transduces a mechanical stimulus into
a cellular growth response is not yet fully understood in any tissue.
One mechanism recently advanced for heart suggests that stretch-induced
activation of second messenger systems,4 43 by a mechanism
independent of stretch sensitive calcium channels,5 leads
to secretion of angiotensin II.44
The data in the present study suggest that an additional mechanism may apply to the mechanically challenged heart. We found that the heart fulfills several salient predictions of the wound hormone hypothesis for bFGF release. First, cardiac myocytes are frequently wounded under normal conditions of cardiac mechanical activity. Second, an increased level of mechanical activity increases the frequency of myocyte wounding. Third, the growth factors, aFGF and bFGF, are released from the mechanically active heart. And, fourth, such release increases with added mechanical load. We propose that FGF is released on contraction-induced wounding of the cardiac myocyte and then acts as an autocrine growth-promoting stimulus for this cell.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received January 10, 1995; accepted March 13, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Etard, U. Roostalu, and U. Strahle Shuttling of the chaperones Unc45b and Hsp90a between the A band and the Z line of the myofibril J. Cell Biol., March 24, 2008; 180(6): 1163 - 1175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Squires, S. M. Muehlbauer, and J. Brojatsch Proteasomes Control Caspase-1 Activation in Anthrax Lethal Toxin-mediated Cell Killing J. Biol. Chem., November 23, 2007; 282(47): 34260 - 34267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Amano, K. Miyake, J.L. Borke, and P.L. McNeil Breaking Biological Barriers with a Toothbrush J. Dent. Res., August 1, 2007; 86(8): 769 - 774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Ingber Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again FASEB J, May 1, 2006; 20(7): 811 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Farkas, J. Lifshitz, and J. T. Povlishock Mechanoporation induced by diffuse traumatic brain injury: an irreversible or reversible response to injury? J. Neurosci., March 22, 2006; 26(12): 3130 - 3140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zolkiewska Ecto-ADP-ribose Transferases: Cell-Surface Response to Local Tissue Injury Physiology, December 1, 2005; 20(6): 374 - 381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. McNeil and P. L. McNeil Yolk granule tethering: a role in cell resealing and identification of several protein components J. Cell Sci., October 15, 2005; 118(20): 4701 - 4708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Vatner FGF Induces Hypertrophy and Angiogenesis in Hibernating Myocardium Circ. Res., April 15, 2005; 96(7): 705 - 707. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Camelliti, T. K. Borg, and P. Kohl Structural and functional characterisation of cardiac fibroblasts Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2005; 65(1): 40 - 51. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Palmen, M. J.A.P. Daemen, L. J. De Windt, J. Willems, W. R.M. Dassen, S. Heeneman, R. Zimmermann, M. Van Bilsen, and P. A. Doevendans Fibroblast growth factor-1 improves cardiac functional recovery and enhances cell survival after ischemia and reperfusion: A fibroblast growth factor receptor, protein kinase c, and tyrosine kinase-dependent mechanism J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 1113 - 1123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kardami, Z.-S. Jiang, S. K Jimenez, C. J Hirst, F. Sheikh, P. Zahradka, and P. A Cattini Fibroblast growth factor 2 isoforms and cardiac hypertrophy Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 2004; 63(3): 458 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K Jimenez, F. Sheikh, Y. Jin, K. A Detillieux, J. Dhaliwal, E. Kardami, and P. A Cattini Transcriptional regulation of FGF-2 gene expression in cardiac myocytes Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2004; 62(3): 548 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Singleton and J. T. Povlishock Identification and Characterization of Heterogeneous Neuronal Injury and Death in Regions of Diffuse Brain Injury: Evidence for Multiple Independent Injury Phenotypes J. Neurosci., April 7, 2004; 24(14): 3543 - 3553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. House, C. Bolte, M. Zhou, T. Doetschman, R. Klevitsky, G. Newman, and J. E. J. Schultz Cardiac-Specific Overexpression of Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Protects Against Myocardial Dysfunction and Infarction in a Murine Model of Low-Flow Ischemia Circulation, December 23, 2003; 108(25): 3140 - 3148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|