© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Adenosine-Recruitable Flow Reserve Is Absent During Myocardial Ischemia in Unanesthetized Dogs Studied in the Basal State
From the Departments of Medicine and Physiology at the State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, and the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Buffalo, NY.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Abstract We conducted the present study to determine if pharmacologically recruitable flow reserve was present during ischemia in unanesthetized dogs studied in the absence of adrenergic activation. Microsphere measurements of regional perfusion at reduced coronary pressures in a distal circumflex region subjected to intracoronary adenosine infusion (0.265 mg/min IC) were compared with measurements in a proximal circumflex region where pressure was reduced but flow was being autoregulated normally. Ischemia began when coronary pressure was reduced below 40 mm Hg. At a coronary pressure of 28±1 (mean±SEM) mm Hg, subendocardial flow with autoregulation intact was 0.59±0.05 mL · min · g-1 and similar to that in the region receiving adenosine, which averaged 0.61±0.05 mL · min-1 · g-1 (P=NS). Although adenosine increased subepicardial flow from 0.81±0.05 to 1.16±0.09 mL · min-1 · g-1 (P<.001), the magnitude of the increase was minimal when coronary pressure fell to a level that caused subepicardial flow during autoregulation to be reduced below resting values. These results demonstrate that the substantially lower autoregulatory break point found in unanesthetized dogs studied in the basal state reflects the ability of intrinsic autoregulatory mechanisms to match local vasodilator reserve to that recruitable pharmacologically. This contrasts with the presence of pharmacologically recruitable subendocardial flow reserve in anesthetized animals and is most likely related to a low level of circulating catecholamines and lack of sympathetic activation in unanesthetized animals studied under basal conditions.
Key Words: autoregulation • myocardial ischemia • subendocardial flow • adrenergic tone • adenosine • flow reserve
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
A number of studies in anesthetized animals have demonstrated that intrinsic autoregulatory mechanisms are unable to match local coronary flow to local vasodilator reserve recruited pharmacologically in the setting of ischemia.1 2 3 4 Similar reductions in myocardial perfusion with pharmacologically recruitable flow reserve have also been demonstrated to occur during ischemia following activation of adrenergic tone in unanesthetized animals.5 6 7 8 Collectively, the results of these studies support the notion that there is a continuous competition between adrenergic constrictor tone and metabolic vasodilation that can accentuate the severity of ischemia at any given level of reduced coronary pressure.
The potential relevance of these findings to coronary flow regulation in the basal unanesthetized state has not been established. During autoregulation in unanesthetized animals, subendocardial flow remains constant until coronary pressure falls below 40 mm Hg9 compared with lower autoregulatory pressure limits of 60 mm Hg and higher in open-chest anesthetized animals studied under comparable systemic hemodynamic conditions.10 11 This large difference cannot be explained by hemodynamic factors and may reflect the ability of the unanesthetized animal to match local flow to local vasodilator reserve more precisely. It may in part relate to the fact that circulating catecholamine levels are not elevated in conscious dogs at rest12 or during moderate ischemia13 and to the lack of reflex sympathetic nerve activation until severe levels of myocardial ischemia are produced.14 Although indirect, the shift in the autoregulatory pressure limit to lower pressures in unanesthetized animals suggests that pharmacologically recruitable flow reserve may not be present during subendocardial ischemia under basal conditions.
The present study tested the hypothesis that reductions in subendocardial perfusion are not associated with pharmacologically recruitable coronary flow reserve in unanesthetized animals when adrenergic activation is absent. Experiments were conducted in chronically instrumented dogs studied at rest, with radioactive microspheres used to assess regional perfusion. We used a paired experimental design to simultaneously compare regional perfusion in myocardial samples from a proximal left circumflex (LC) region that was autoregulating flow normally to measurements in a distal LC region that was subjected to adenosine vasodilation delivered through an intracoronary catheter. Since both regions were subjected to the same systemic and coronary hemodynamics, this experimental approach circumvented the confounding effects of changes in flow due to small variations in hemodynamics when sequential microsphere flow measurements to the same region are compared. The results contrast with previous studies examining autoregulation in open-chest anesthetized animals and demonstrate that adenosine-recruitable flow reserve is absent during subendocardial ischemia.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The studies were conducted in 15 chronically instrumented mongrel dogs of either sex weighing 28±1.3 (mean±SEM) kg. All procedures were performed in accordance with institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals in research.
Experimental Preparation
The details of the experimental preparation have been previously
published.9 Briefly, animals were fasted overnight and
premedicated with Innovar-Vet (0.4 mg/mL fentanyl and 20 mg/mL
droperidol, 1 to 3 mL IM). A surgical plane of anesthesia was induced
with sodium thiamylal (20 mg/kg IV). After endotracheal intubation, the
dogs were mechanically ventilated, and anesthesia was maintained with a
halothane (1% to 2%)/nitrous oxide (
60%)/oxygen (balance)
mixture. Under sterile conditions, a thoracotomy was performed in the
fourth or fifth left intercostal space.
The experimental preparation is shown in Fig 1
. After
suspending the heart in a pericardial cradle, Tygon catheters were
placed into the left atrium and descending thoracic aorta for
microsphere injection and reference blood flow sampling, respectively.
A micromanometer (model P6.5, Konigsberg Instruments Inc) was inserted
into the left ventricular apex through a stab wound. A short segment of
the proximal LC artery before the first major marginal branch was
dissected free and instrumented with a hydraulic occluder. A small
polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) catheter was placed into the
midportion of the LC artery so that its tip was beyond the first major
marginal branch. The coronary catheter was used for pressure
measurement as well as to infuse adenosine (53.5 mg/100 mL saline at
0.5 mL/min IC) into the distal segment of the LC artery. By selectively
infusing adenosine into the distal half of the LC region, it was
possible to simultaneously assess perfusion in tissue samples from a
proximal LC region that was autoregulating flow normally and a distal
LC region subjected to vasodilation with intracoronary adenosine by
using radioactive microspheres (see Fig 1). This approach also ensured
that both regions of the heart were subjected to identical hemodynamic
conditions during the microsphere flow measurements and circumvented
potential difficulties in assessing small flow differences with
sequential microsphere flow measurements. The coronary catheter was
constructed by modifying a 22-gauge angiocatheter (model 38-2862-1,
Deseret Inc). Briefly, a 1-in length of polyethylene tubing (PE-60,
Clay Adams) was placed over the original angiocatheter needle. The
Teflon angiocatheter sheath was removed and cut to a length of 1 in
from its tip, and the remaining sheath and luer connector were
discarded. The Teflon tip was gently advanced over the needle and
inserted into the polyethylene tubing until the bevel of the needle was
visible. A small 0.25-in silastic cuff (inner diameter, 0.03 in; outer
diameter, 0.065 in; model 602-175, Dow Corning) was placed over both
the Teflon and polyethylene tubing. This was used to bind the two tubes
together and attach sutures and needles that were used to anchor the
catheter after it was placed in the vessel. The original needle and
modified Teflon sheath were inserted through the vessel wall at an
angle of 45°. The catheter was carefully advanced over the needle and
into the vessel lumen. After adequate blood return was confirmed, the
needle was withdrawn, and the catheter was connected to an 18-in length
of Tygon tubing (inner diameter, 0.020 in; outer diameter, 0.060 in;
Norton Plastics) by using a 1-in length of 21-gauge stainless steel
hypodermic tubing. A similar Teflon catheter was placed into the
ascending aorta for pressure measurement (not shown in Fig 1).
|
After placing all of the instruments, the chest was closed and the pneumothorax was evacuated. The catheters and wires were exteriorized and placed into a jacket that the animal was trained to wear. Parenteral analgesics (meperidine, 50 mg IM as needed) were given during the early postoperative period as required. Each animal was given prophylactic antibiotics for 3 to 5 days after surgery (procaine penicillin G, 300 000 U; streptomycin, 300 mg IM QD). All catheters were flushed and filled with heparinized saline (1000 U/mL) at 2- to 3-day intervals. They were allowed to recover for at least 10 days before the studies were conducted with the animals in the unanesthetized state (19±2 days after instrumentation).
Experimental Protocol
On the day of the study, the dogs were lightly sedated with
Innovar-Vet (1 to 3 mL) and studied while they were lying in the right
lateral decubitus position. The experimental protocol was begun after
allowing at least 30 minutes for the animals to adjust to the
laboratory. Regional myocardial perfusion was assessed with radioactive
microspheres (15 µm in diameter); the reference withdrawal technique
was used as previously described.9 Briefly, microspheres
were suspended in 10% dextran and 0.01% Tween 80. They were
ultrasonicated for at least 15 minutes and vortex-agitated immediately
before they were withdrawn. Approximately 3x106
microspheres were injected into the left atrium over 15 to 20 seconds
after beginning an arterial reference withdrawal sample (4 mL/min) that
was continued for 2 minutes. A combination of the following
radionuclides was used: 54Co, 141Ce,
114In, 113Sn, 104Ru,
85Sr, 75Nb, 46Sc, 51Cr,
and 54Mn. Control microsphere flow measurements were
obtained at the spontaneous coronary pressure under resting conditions.
After this, adenosine was infused into the distal coronary artery at a
rate of 0.5 mL/min, and coronary pressure was gradually reduced to a
level below 40 mm Hg. We have previously shown that this degree of
pressure reduction is associated with the onset of subendocardial
ischemia under resting conditions in unanesthetized dogs.9
After allowing at least 5 minutes for coronary pressure and systemic
hemodynamics to reach a new steady state, a microsphere flow
measurement was repeated. Additional flow measurements were performed
at up to three levels of steady state coronary pressure reduction in
each of the animals. In 10 of the animals, microsphere flow
measurements were obtained in the awake state during intracoronary
adenosine infusion at normal coronary pressures in the absence of a
stenosis and during either a total LC occlusion or severe ischemia in
the absence of adenosine infusion. These measurements were used to
demarcate the areas subjected to adenosine infusion and the LC risk
area distal to the occluder that was subjected to reduced coronary
pressure. In the remaining five animals, measurements during adenosine
infusion at normal pressures and during coronary occlusion in the
absence of adenosine were obtained during anesthesia with pentobarbital
(30 mg/kg IV) as part of a separate study protocol. Although the latter
measurements were not included in the present study, they were used
to demarcate the perfusion territory as outlined below. At the end of
the experiments, the animals were anesthetized with sodium
pentobarbital and euthanatized with an injection of potassium chloride.
The hearts were removed and placed in 10% formalin for fixation.
Microsphere Flow Analysis and Heart Sectioning
Several days later, the left ventricle was sectioned into four
concentric rings, and the apex was discarded. After removing epicardial
fat and connective tissue, we discarded the septum and sectioned the
free wall of the left ventricle from each of the concentric rings into
10 to 20 small wedges that weighed 1 to 2 g. Each of the wedges was
subsequently sectioned into four transmural layers of approximately
equal thickness. The myocardial samples were weighed and counted on a
germanium well detector (Canberra, Inc). The principal photon peaks of
gamma-emitting radionuclides analyzed with this instrument have a
full-width half-maximum of 2 to 4 keV as opposed to the 20- to
40-keV photopeak widths obtained on conventional sodium iodide
detectors.15 As a result, up to 12 radionuclides with
nonoverlapping photopeaks can be analyzed in the same sample by simply
subtracting the local background energy from the area under the
principle photopeaks by using standard spectral analysis software
(Spectran). Flow measurements in each tissue sample were calculated
from the integral counts under each photopeak in relation to the
reference blood samples and expressed as flow per gram of tissue, as
previously described.9
Flow distributions under control conditions, during coronary occlusion in the absence of adenosine, and during adenosine administration at normal coronary pressures were used to define the myocardial tissue samples in the proximal LC region subjected to reduced LC pressure during autoregulation and the samples in the distal region subjected to adenosine vasodilation. The LC area that was subjected to coronary pressure reduction distal to the occluder (or risk area) was determined during coronary occlusion in the absence of adenosine. By examining the circumferential flow pattern, border samples between the LC free wall and normally perfused left anterior descending (LAD) or septal regions could be identified from their intermediate flows due to overlapping perfusion from normal and ischemic regions and thus eliminated from further analysis. Once the LC samples subjected to coronary pressure reduction were identified, we compared the flow measurements under resting conditions with those obtained during an intracoronary adenosine infusion at the normal coronary pressure. The proximal autoregulating LC region was identified as wedges that had flows during infusion of adenosine into the distal coronary artery that were within 50% of their corresponding values at rest. Distal regions subjected to adenosine were identified as those samples having flows that were at least 300% higher than the corresponding resting flow value. Samples between the proximal and distal regions that had intermediate flow levels between these two values were not used for analysis since they represented a "border region" having an admixture of maximally vasodilated and autoregulating LC tissue. Once the proximal autoregulating and distal adenosine samples were identified, we obtained weighted averages of the flow measurements by using the same aggregate samples in each region for each experimental condition. These aggregate regions were felt to reflect core samples that were free of any overlapping perfusion. Two additional animals were excluded from analysis because the flow distribution demonstrated that the distal coronary infusion catheter had entered a proximal marginal branch as opposed to the main LC artery. A third animal was excluded from analysis because of anemia and a hematocrit of <30%.
Effect of Innovar-Vet on the Phenylephrine Dose-Response Curve
Four additional animals were instrumented to assess the
magnitude of adrenergic blockade produced by Innovar-Vet. Mean arterial
pressure, heart rate, and LC coronary flow (Transonics flowmeter) were
assessed with the animals in the conscious state and repeated 30 and 90
minutes (n=3) after sedation with an injection of Innovar-Vet (2 mL
IM). The extent of 
-blockade was assessed by examining the pressor
response following steady state infusions of phenylephrine
at doses of 1, 3, 10, and 30
µg · kg-1 · min-1 IV. The
phenylephrine infusion was stopped once mean arterial
pressure increased by 60 mm Hg above baseline. Heart rate was kept
constant by pacing at a rate approximately equal to that obtained in
the resting unsedated state.
Data Analysis
All experimental data were digitized for 15 seconds at a
sampling rate of 200 Hz with a DT-280lA analog-to-digital convertor
(Data Translation) interfaced to an IBM PC AT computer. Measurements of
regional perfusion during ischemia were pooled and also
categorized on the basis of the degree to which subendocardial
perfusion in the proximal autoregulating region was reduced compared
with simultaneous measurements in the normally perfused LAD region. All
hemodynamic parameters and microsphere flow measurements were subjected
to a one-way ANOVA. Significant differences between each category and
the corresponding control values were assessed by paired t
tests and the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons when
appropriate. Differences were determined to be significant at
P
.05.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Summary of Baseline Hemodynamics and Regional Perfusion at Rest
Under resting conditions, heart rate averaged 91±4 beats per minute (mean±SEM, n=15), left ventricular systolic pressure averaged 120±2 mm Hg, and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure averaged 9.5±0.9 mm Hg. Peak positive left ventricular dP/dt was 3800±103 mm Hg · s-1, and peak negative left ventricular dP/dt was -2677±143 mm Hg · s-1. Full-thickness myocardial perfusion at rest averaged 1.10±0.06 mL · min-1 · g-1 in the distal LC region, 1.09±0.05 mL · min-1 · g-1 in the proximal LC region, and 1.10±0.06 mL · min-1 · g-1 in the LAD region (P=NS). Thus, regional perfusion under resting conditions was not systematically different in the three core regions of the left ventricular free wall.
Effect of Coronary Occlusion and Intracoronary Adenosine on
Regional Perfusion at Normal Coronary Pressures
Fig 2 shows the effect of a coronary occlusion and
intracoronary adenosine infused at a normal coronary pressure on the
transmural distribution of perfusion. Measurements in the distal LC
area subjected to the intracoronary drug infusion are compared with the
proximal LC and LAD regions, which were autoregulating blood flow
normally. Intracoronary adenosine increased full-thickness flow in the
distal LC region fivefold from 1.18±0.08 to 6.40±0.47
mL · min-1 · g-1
(P<.001). In contrast to the marked increase in flow to the
distal LC region, flow in both the proximal LC region (1.20±0.08
versus 1.34±0.07 mL · min-1 · g-1)
and the normally perfused LAD free wall (1.18±0.08 versus 1.30±0.10
mL · min-1 · g-1) did not
significantly change during intracoronary adenosine. Fig 2 also shows
the effects of a total coronary occlusion on flow in the LC and LAD
regions. During a total coronary occlusion, flow fell to a similar
extent in the proximal LC (0.26±0.05
mL · min-1 · g-1) and distal LC
(0.29±0.05 mL · min-1 · g-1) regions
(P=NS). During a total occlusion, LAD flow tended to
increase over that under resting conditions (from 1.15±0.08 to
1.25±0.06 mL · min-1 · g-1), but the
difference did not reach statistical significance. These results
demonstrate that myocardial perfusion at rest and during a total
occlusion of the LC were similar in the proximal and distal LC regions.
Intracoronary adenosine produced selective vasodilation in the LC
region distal to the coronary catheter but did not significantly affect
flow in the proximal LC region that was autoregulating flow
normally.
|
Effect of Intracoronary Adenosine on Regional Perfusion During
Ischemia
The effects of adenosine vasodilation on transmural
perfusion are summarized for all ischemic flow measurements (n=31) in
Fig 3. At an average distal coronary pressure of 28±1
mm Hg, there was no effect of adenosine on subendocardial perfusion
(0.59±0.05 mL · min-1 · g-1 in the
proximal autoregulating region and 0.61±0.05
mL · min-1 · g-1 in the distal region
receiving adenosine, P=NS). Nevertheless, flow to the outer
myocardial layers showed small but significant increases. These were
most pronounced in the subepicardial layers, where flow increased from
0.81±0.05 mL · min-1 · g-1 in the
proximal autoregulating region to 1.16±0.09
mL · min-1 · g-1 in the distal
subepicardial region receiving adenosine (P<.001).
|
We examined the possibility that the increase in flow to outer
myocardial layers may have reflected the fact that coronary pressure
was still above the lower autoregulatory pressure limit, which for the
subepicardium is 25 mm Hg in unanesthetized dogs.9 To
accomplish this, the effects of adenosine were examined as a function
of the level of ischemia. Hemodynamics and flows categorized according
to the magnitude of subendocardial flow reduction (expressed as a
percentage of control flow) are summarized in Tables 1 and 2 and Fig 4. There was no significant
effect of adenosine on subendocardial perfusion at any level of
ischemia (Table 2 and Fig 4). In contrast, subepicardial flow reserve
was present at all levels of ischemia. Mild and moderate levels of
subendocardial ischemia were not associated with significant
reductions in subepicardial flow in the proximal autoregulating
region compared with corresponding measurements under resting
conditions (Fig 4), demonstrating the absence of subepicardial ischemia
despite significant reductions in coronary pressure. Subepicardial flow
became significantly reduced during severe ischemia (25±2.5 mm Hg)
but, at this time, increased minimally during adenosine administration
(0.65±0.07 mL · min-1 · g-1 in the
autoregulating region and 0.76±0.06
mL · min-1 · g-1 in the distal
adenosine region, P<.05). Thus, the presence of
adenosine-recruitable flow reserve in the outer layers in the
face of mild and moderate subendocardial ischemia reflected the fact
that despite significant reductions in coronary pressure, the
subepicardium was not ischemic. When subepicardial flow fell below the
resting value, the magnitude of adenosine-recruitable reserve
was small.
|
|
|
Table 3 summarizes the number of microspheres in each
myocardial region during ischemia. On average, all regions had more
than 400 microspheres, which would result in a relative
error16 in flow measurement of <5%. For the most
severely ischemic subendocardial sample with the lowest microsphere
flow number (127 microspheres), the relative error would have been
8.9%. The total weight of samples from the normally perfused LAD free
wall (that was selected by visual inspection of the heart)
averaged 7.8±0.7 g. The sizes of the proximal LC autoregulating region
and distal LC adenosine region were roughly similar and averaged
4.8±0.7 and 7.2±0.7 g, respectively.
|
Effect of Innovar-Vet on the Phenylephrine Dose-Response Curve
Four additional dogs were studied to quantify the -adrenergic
blocking effects of Innovar-Vet. Hemodynamic responses at 30 and 90
minutes after an intramuscular injection were similar and therefore
averaged to compare with measurements in the conscious state. Resting
hemodynamic measurements with animals in the conscious state were not
significantly different from those after sedation with intramuscular
Innovar-Vet (mean aortic pressure, 99±8 versus 94±6 mm Hg; heart
rate, 109±12 versus 105±5 beats per minute; and mean LC flow, 26±6
versus 26±7 mL/min [n=3]). The extent of -blockade was assessed
by examining the change in aortic pressure after graded infusions of
phenylephrine and is shown in Fig 5.
Innovar-Vet produced a slight attenuation of the pressor response to
pharmacological doses of the -agonist that was significant at
infusion rates of 3 and 10
µg · kg-1 · min-1
(P<.01). This weak -blocking effect produced an
approximately half log shift in the phenylephrine
dose-response curve.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
In contrast to the results of previous studies demonstrating pharmacologically recruitable subendocardial flow reserve during ischemia in anesthetized animals, subendocardial flow in unanesthetized animals studied in the basal state is precisely autoregulated to match local vasodilator reserve, and adenosine has no effect on subendocardial flow during ischemia. Although flow to outer layers of the left ventricular free wall increased during adenosine administration, the magnitude of this effect was small and largely abolished during severe ischemia, when coronary pressure fell below the subepicardial autoregulatory pressure limit. Thus, in the absence of sympathetic activation, regional perfusion during ischemia is closely matched to local vasodilator reserve by intrinsic autoregulatory mechanisms. Before discussing our findings, it is important to discuss the potential methodological limitations of the present study.
Methodological Limitations
We were able to examine LC flow during autoregulation and
adenosine under identical hemodynamic conditions by comparing
microsphere perfusion in two separate regions subjected to an identical
level of coronary pressure reduction. A similar paired approach was
previously used by Chilian and Ackell13 in a study
examining the effects of regional denervation on transmural perfusion
during exercise distal to a coronary stenosis. Like their study, our
interpretation also assumes that perfusion in each of the two LC
regions was similar. In support of this, we found that there was no
difference in perfusion between the proximal and distal LC regions
under resting conditions. Similarly, during a total LC occlusion in the
absence of adenosine, flow fell to the same extent in each of the two
regions. The latter finding indicates that during ischemia perfusion
was distributed uniformly in each of the aggregate core areas and that
these areas did not include a variable admixture of tissue from
overlapping border regions.
A second assumption important for interpreting our results is that the intracoronary adenosine produced maximum vasodilation and was delivered selectively to the distal LC region. We found that intracoronary adenosine infused at normal coronary pressures increased flow to the distal region by over five times that found under resting conditions. Although we did not assess the reactive hyperemic response since coronary flow was measured with microspheres, infusion of a twofold higher dose of adenosine into the entire LC region (ie, both proximal and distal LC regions) in a previous study abolished reactive hyperemia.17 In addition, estimates of plasma adenosine concentration based on the present infusion rate and flow during vasodilation of 180 mL/min17 result in a calculated plasma concentration exceeding 9 µmol/L. As coronary flow is reduced to resting values in the face of a constant infusion, plasma adenosine concentrations would exceed 45 µmol/L. Both of these values are one to two orders of magnitude greater than the ED50 for adenosine of 0.57 µmol/L demonstrated by Olsson et al18 in conscious dogs. Flow measurements from myocardial samples in the proximal autoregulating region and in the normally perfused LAD region did not change, indicating that adenosine was metabolized to levels that did not alter coronary vascular resistance before it recirculated to the systemic arterial circulation. In a previous study, we found that infusion of a twofold higher dose of adenosine into the pulmonary artery also had no effect on coronary flow.17 Evidence that the intracoronary administration of adenosine remained selective at reduced coronary pressures is less direct. Although adenosine had no effect on subendocardial perfusion during ischemia, there were small increases in subepicardial blood flow at coronary pressures that, although reduced, were still above the lower pressure limit of subepicardial autoregulation. Thus, if adenosine refluxed into the proximal region at reduced coronary pressure, subepicardial flow in the proximal autoregulating region should have also increased in a fashion similar to that in the distal region. Since subepicardial flow in the proximal region did not increase, we feel confident that the selective infusion of adenosine into the distal LC region at reduced pressures was comparable to the infusion that we demonstrated at normal coronary pressures.
An additional methodological concern relates to the variability of flow
due to the microsphere technique. The accuracy of regional perfusion
measurements is dependent on the number of microspheres in each
sample.16 This varies during ischemia and is also
dependent on the size of the subregion that is being examined. On
average, our core regions had >400 microspheres (Table 3
), and the
relative error would be expected to be <5%. The lowest subendocardial
flow associated with severe ischemia still had >100
microspheres per sample and would have a relative error of <10%.
These errors would limit our ability to detect a 5% to 10% difference
in flow after adenosine administration during severe ischemia. Flow
heterogeneity among small myocardial regions of
interest could have also influenced our results. Coggins et
al19 have shown that pharmacologically recruitable reserve
during ischemia in open-chest anesthetized animals can sometimes arise
from spatial perfusion heterogeneity in both resting
and maximal flow to small ventricular regions. They found that the
presence of adenosine-recruitable reserve during ischemia in
large myocardial regions in their preparations could be explained by
the presence of an admixture of subregions that had exhausted flow
reserve (with no effect of adenosine) and nonischemic subregions that
were still autoregulating flow normally and in which vasodilator
reserve was still present. The effects of flow
heterogeneity in their study were dependent on coronary
pressure. They were most pronounced at higher coronary pressures and
completely abolished in the subendocardium when pressure reached 30
mm Hg. In contrast to their results, we found that
adenosine-recruitable subendocardial reserve was absent at
pressures averaging as high as 33 mm Hg (Table 2). This continued to
be true at all levels of coronary pressure and subendocardial flow
studied. Thus, although flow heterogeneity within each
aggregate core region was undoubtedly present, we were unable to
demonstrate pharmacologically recruitable increases in subendocardial
flow. We believe that this discrepancy can be resolved by differences
in the magnitude of perfusion heterogeneity found in
anesthetized as opposed to unanesthetized animals. In the study of
Austin et al,16 the relative dispersion of flow at normal
coronary pressures was larger (coefficient of variation [CV], 24.3%
at rest) compared with values that we have previously reported in
unanesthetized animals (CV, 19.5% at rest).20 There are
probably several explanations for differences in perfusion
heterogeneity in resting flow between anesthetized and
unanesthetized animals, including more heterogeneous oxygen
extraction and a more limited ability to maintain flow constant as
pressure is reduced during autoregulation in anesthetized compared with
unanesthetized animals. An additional possibility explaining the
differences is that maximally vasodilated flows in anesthetized animals
appear to be more heterogeneous than those at
rest19 (CV, 30.4% during vasodilation). We have recently
reported that within individual transmural layers, the CV for flow
actually decreases in unanesthetized animals during
vasodilation.20 Thus, based on the results of the
present study, spatial perfusion heterogeneity does
not invariably result in "apparent" recruitable subendocardial
flow reserve during ischemia.
Lack of Adenosine-Recruitable Subendocardial Flow Reserve Compared
With Previous Studies
The failure of adenosine to increase subendocardial perfusion at
reduced coronary pressure contrasts with the results of previous
studies conducted during autoregulation in open-chest anesthetized
animals from our own laboratory1 as well as
others.2 3 4 Fig 6 compares measurements of
subendocardial perfusion during autoregulation and adenosine infusion
at matched coronary pressures from the present study (solid
triangles) with those from the four previously published
studies.1 2 3 4 The solid line shows a perfect match between
autoregulated flow and subendocardial vasodilator reserve.
Collectively, the experiments conducted in open-chest anesthetized
animals at controlled coronary pressure found that after intracoronary
vasodilation, subendocardial flow in the setting of ischemia could
increase above the corresponding flow during autoregulation by an
average of 80%. In contrast, the data from unanesthetized animals in
the present study demonstrate a lack of
adenosine-recruitable subendocardial flow reserve. This could
not be explained by the severity of ischemia, since there was no effect
of adenosine on subendocardial flow during mild, moderate, or severe
reductions in circumflex pressure (Table 2 and Fig 4). Thus, in the
absence of anesthesia and/or acute surgical instrumentation, coronary
autoregulation in unanesthetized animals is able to match
subendocardial perfusion to the local vasodilator reserve recruitable
by pharmacological agents. The ability of intrinsic autoregulatory
mechanisms to match flow to local vasodilator reserve probably explains
our previous findings that revealed a substantially lower
autoregulatory pressure limit of 40 mm Hg in the basal unanesthetized
state9 that increased to only 60 mm Hg during pacing at a
rate of 200 beats per minute.21 Additionally, the levels
of flow during adenosine vasodilation are similar to those demonstrated
by Bache and Schwartz22 at comparable levels of reduced
coronary pressure in anesthetized animals.
|
The lack of pharmacologically recruitable subendocardial flow reserve
in the basal state also contrasts with findings during regional
ischemia and sympathetic activation in anesthetized as well as
unanesthetized animals. Stellate ganglion stimulation23
and intracoronary norepinephrine infusion24 reduce
perfusion in the setting of regional myocardial ischemia. Similarly,
physiological activation of adrenergic constrictor mechanisms following
exercise in unanesthetized dogs also modulates myocardial perfusion in
the setting of ischemia distal to a flow-limiting coronary artery
stenosis. Seitelberger et al6 and Laxson et
al7 found that -adrenergic blockade improved myocardial
perfusion during ischemia, although the specific adrenergic subtype
responsible for this improvement was controversial. Laxson et
al8 subsequently showed that subendocardial perfusion
during exercise at a constant coronary pressure could also be increased
by pharmacological vasodilation with intracoronary adenosine. These
investigators were careful to prevent confounding effects of a
transmural steal during adenosine by keeping pressure distal to the
stenosis constant during exercise.
Although previous studies clearly show that sympathetic activation can
modulate subendocardial flow in unanesthetized animals, the level of
activation required to overcome intrinsic autoregulatory mechanisms in
the subendocardium does not appear to be present when
unanesthetized animals are studied in the basal state. Our observations
are consistent with the finding that resting coronary flow is not
altered by adrenergic denervation in animals studied in the basal
state.12 In further support of this are the observations
of Chilian and Ackell,13 who found no effect of
denervation on myocardial perfusion at moderate levels of ischemia
until sympathetic activation was produced by submaximal exercise. In
addition, Minisi and Thames14 have shown that reflex
sympathetic activation does not occur until severe transmural ischemia
is produced and that this primarily affects the subepicardial layers of
the left ventricular wall. Thus, even though the droperidol, which was
used to sedate the animal in this study, has weak -blocking
properties in vivo25 (Fig 5), it would not have affected
our interpretation of the results during mild to moderate ischemia due
to the lack of sympathetic activation and/or elevations in circulating
catecholamine levels. During severe ischemia, it could have affected
the magnitude of adenosine-recruitable subepicardial reserve
(see below).
Significance of Adenosine-Recruitable Subepicardial Reserve
Although adenosine did not affect perfusion to the subendocardium,
flow to the outer layers increased to a small but significant amount.
Much of the increase could be explained by the fact that even though
subendocardial flow was reduced below control, corresponding
subepicardial flow measurements were frequently not reduced because
coronary pressure continued to exceed the lower limit of
autoregulation, which we have previously demonstrated to be near 25
mm Hg for the subepicardium.9 Although this appears to
account for most of the recruitable flow reserve in outer layers, there
continued to be a small further increase in subepicardial flow during
severe ischemia, when subepicardial flow during autoregulation was
reduced below control values. The possibility that this small
difference was due to flow heterogeneity is difficult
to exclude. Nevertheless, we have previously reported that the
magnitude of flow heterogeneity under resting
conditions is similar within different layers of the left ventricle in
unanesthetized dogs,20 and it would be difficult to
explain why flow increases in the subepicardium and not the
subendocardium on this basis. It is also probably not secondary to
transmural differences in the ability of individual myocardial layers
to autoregulate flow, since we have previously demonstrated that
closed-loop autoregulatory gain is similar in subendocardial and
subepicardial layers of the left ventricular free wall in
unanesthetized dogs.9 21 Although Chilian et
al12 showed that there was no significant difference in
resting perfusion to denervated as opposed to innervated myocardial
regions (demonstrating the lack of an adrenergic constrictor tone in
unanesthetized dogs at rest), a small degree of reflex sympathetic
activation could have occurred in response to severe regional
myocardial ischemia when we reduced coronary pressure. This is
supported by the fact that heart rate increased significantly during
the most severe levels of coronary pressure reduction (Table 2). Such a
mechanism could serve to preferentially direct flow to the
subendocardium in the face of transmural
ischemia.13 26 In addition, the degree of flow
reduction during severe ischemia is close to that required to cause
increases in cardiac sympathetic nerve activity during regional
ischemia (subendocardial flow, 26% of control; subepicardial flow,
54% of control).14 As shown in Fig 5, the weak
-adrenergic blocking properties of droperidol may have caused us to
underestimate the magnitude of recruitable subepicardial flow reserve
during severe ischemia.
In summary, the present study demonstrates that
pharmacologically recruitable flow reserve at reduced coronary
pressures during autoregulation in unanesthetized animals is minimal.
During ischemia, there is no effect of adenosine on subendocardial
flow, and the small increases in flow occurring to the outer portions
of the left ventricular free wall are largely due to the fact that
coronary pressure continues to be above the lower autoregulatory
pressure limit for these layers. Although speculative, both the shift
in the autoregulatory limit observed in anesthetized open-chest animals
compared with unanesthetized animals and the presence of
pharmacologically recruitable subendocardial vasodilator reserve during
ischemia probably reflect effects of abnormally high circulating
catecholamine levels and/or adrenergic constrictor tone competing with,
and overcoming, intrinsic stimuli for vasodilation. This is supported
by the finding that 1-adrenergic blockade, like
adenosine, increases flow at reduced coronary pressures during
autoregulation in anesthetized open-chest dogs.27
Based on our findings, studies designed to examine the presence
of pharmacologically recruitable flow reserve during autoregulation
distal to a coronary stenosis need to consider the possibility that
observations in anesthetized open-chest animals may be modulated by
abnormal levels of sympathetic activation and/or circulating
catecholamines. This may influence intrinsic autoregulatory mechanisms
in a fashion that may not be relevant to the control of coronary flow
in the basal unanesthetized state.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant HL-15194, American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid 93-966, and a merit review award from the Veterans Administration. This study could not have been completed without the expert technical assistance of Kathleen Harris, Kathleen Weibel, and Amy Johnson. The secretarial assistance of Nina Goss is greatly appreciated.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Reprint requests to John M. Canty, Jr, MD, SUNY/B Clinical Center, Room CC-172, 462 Grider St, Buffalo, NY 14215-3012.
Received January 31, 1994; accepted February 28, 1995.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Canty JM Jr, Klocke FJ. Reduced regional myocardial perfusion in the presence of pharmacologic vasodilator reserve. Circulation. 1985;71:370-377.
2. Aversano T, Becker LC. Persistence of coronary vasodilator reserve despite functionally significant flow reduction. Am J Physiol. 1985;248:H403-H411.
3. Pantely GA, Bristow JD, Swenson LJ, Ladley HD, Johnson WB, Anselone CG. Incomplete coronary vasodilation during myocardial ischemia in swine. Am J Physiol. 1985;249:H638-H647.
4. Grattan MT, Hanley FL, Stevens MB, Hoffman JIE. Transmural coronary flow reserve patterns in dogs. Am J Physiol. 1986;250:H276-H283.
5.
Heusch G, Guth BD, Seitelberger R, Ross J Jr.
Attenuation of ischemia in dogs with recruitment of coronary
vasodilator reserve by nifedipine.
Circulation. 1987;75:482-490.
6.
Seitelberger R, Guth BD, Heusch G, Lee JD, Katayama K,
Ross J Jr. Intracoronary 2-adrenergic receptor
blockade attenuates ischemia in conscious dogs during exercise.
Circ Res. 1988;62:436-442.
7.
Laxson DD, Dai XZ, Homans DC, Bache RJ. The
role of 1 and 2-adrenergic receptors in
mediation of coronary vasoconstriction in hypoperfused ischemic
myocardium during exercise. Circ Res. 1989;65:1688-1697.
8.
Laxson DD, Dai X-Z, Homans DC, Bache RJ.
Coronary vasodilator reserve in ischemic myocardium of the
exercising dog. Circulation. 1992;85:313-322.
9.
Canty JM Jr. Coronary pressure-function and
steady-state pressure-flow relations during autoregulation in the
unanesthetized dog. Circ Res. 1988;63:821-836.
10. Guyton RA, McClenathan JH, Newman GE, Michaels LL. Significance of subendocardial S-T segment elevation caused by coronary stenosis in the dog. Am J Cardiol. 1977;40:373-380. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Gallagher KP, Kumada T, Kozioc JA, McKown MD, Kemper
WS, Ross J Jr. Significance of regional wall thickening
abnormalities relative to transmural myocardial perfusion in
anesthetized dogs. Circulation. 1980;62:1266-1274.
12.
Chilian WM, Boatwright RB, Shoji T, Griggs DM Jr.
Evidence against significant resting sympathetic coronary
vasoconstrictor tone in the conscious dog. Circ
Res. 1981;49:866-876.
13.
Chilian WM, Ackell PH. Transmural differences in
sympathetic coronary constriction during exercise in the presence of
coronary stenosis. Circ Res. 1988;62:216-225.
14.
Minisi AJ, Thames MD. Activation of cardiac
sympathetic afferents during coronary occlusion: evidence for reflex
activation of sympathetic nervous system during transmural myocardial
ischemia in the dog. Circulation. 1991;84:357-367.
15. Kaufman L, Rowan W, Payne B, Hoffman J, Henck R, Schoenmaekers W, Camp D. Large germanium well counter for blood flow measurements by the microsphere technique. Nucl Instr Methods. 1982;193:111-114.
16.
Austin RE Jr, Aldea GS, Coggins DL, Flynn AE, Hoffman
JIE. Profound spatial heterogeneity of coronary
reserve: discordance between patterns of resting and maximal myocardial
blood flow. Circ Res. 1990;67:319-331.
17.
Canty JM Jr, Schwartz JS. Nitric oxide mediates
flow-dependent epicardial coronary vasodilation to changes in pulse
frequency but not mean flow in conscious dogs.
Circulation. 1994;89:375-384.
18.
Olsson RA, Khouri EM, Bedynek JL Jr, McLean J.
Coronary vasoactivity of adenosine in the conscious dog.
Circ Res. 1979;45:468-478.
19.
Coggins DL, Flynn AE, Austin RE Jr, Aldea GS, Muehrcke
D, Goto M, Hoffman JIE. Nonuniform loss of regional flow reserve
during myocardial ischemia in dogs. Circ
Res. 1990;67:253-264.
20. Canty JM Jr, Weibel K. Disparate effects of ischemic and pharmacologic vasodilation on myocardial flow heterogeneity in conscious dogs. Circulation. 1989;80(suppl II):II-191. Abstract.
21.
Canty JM Jr, Giglia J, Kandath D. Effect of
tachycardia on regional function and transmural myocardial perfusion
during graded coronary pressure reduction in conscious dogs.
Circulation. 1990;82:1815-1825.
22.
Bache RJ, Schwartz JS. Effect of perfusion
pressure distal to a coronary stenosis on transmural myocardial blood
flow. Circulation. 1982;65:928-935.
23.
Heusch G, Deussen A. The effects of cardiac
sympathetic nerve stimulation on perfusion of stenotic coronary
arteries in the dog. Circ Res. 1983;53:8-15.
24.
Buffington CW, Feigl EO. Effect of coronary
artery pressure on transmural distribution of adrenergic coronary
vasoconstriction in the dog. Circ Res. 1983;53:613-621.
25. Koehntop DE, Liao JC, Buckley JJ. Dissimilarities between droperidol and phentolamine on vascular tone and dopamine and norepinephrine vasoconstriction. Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol. 1982;38:179-191. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Nathan HJ, Feigl EO. Adrenergic vasoconstriction lessens transmural steal during coronary hypoperfusion. Am J Physiol. 1986;250:H645-H653.
27.
Liang IYS, Jones CE. 1-Adrenergic
blockade increases coronary blood flow during coronary
hypoperfusion. Am J Physiol. 1985;249:H1070-H1077.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  D. J. Duncker and R. J. Bache Regulation of Coronary Blood Flow During Exercise Physiol Rev, July 1, 2008; 88(3): 1009 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Sorop, D. Merkus, V. J. de Beer, B. Houweling, A. Pistea, E. O. McFalls, F. Boomsma, H. M. van Beusekom, W. J. van der Giessen, E. VanBavel, et al. Functional and Structural Adaptations of Coronary Microvessels Distal to a Chronic Coronary Artery Stenosis Circ. Res., April 11, 2008; 102(7): 795 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T H Schindler, E Nitzsche, N Magosaki, I Brink, M Mix, M Olschewski, U Solzbach, and H Just Regional myocardial perfusion defects during exercise, as assessed by three dimensional integration of morphology and function, in relation to abnormal endothelium dependent vasoreactivity of the coronary microcirculation Heart, May 1, 2003; 89(5): 517 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Rajappan, O. E. Rimoldi, D. P. Dutka, B. Ariff, D. J. Pennell, D. J. Sheridan, and P. G. Camici Mechanisms of Coronary Microcirculatory Dysfunction in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Angiographically Normal Coronary Arteries Circulation, January 29, 2002; 105(4): 470 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Sambuceti, M. Marzilli, A. Mari, C. Marini, P. Marzullo, R. Testa, I. Raugei, M. Papini, M. Schluter, and A. L'Abbate Clinical evidence for myocardial derecruitment downstream from severe stenosis: pressure-flow control interaction Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2000; 279(6): H2641 - H2648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Kitakaze, K. Node, T. Minamino, H. Asanuma, T. Kuzuya, and M. Hori A Ca channel blocker, benidipine, increases coronary blood flow and attenuates the severity of myocardial ischemia via NO-dependent mechanisms in dogs J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 1999; 33(1): 242 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Duncker, R. Stubenitsky, and P. D. Verdouw Role of adenosine in the regulation of coronary blood flow in swine at rest and during treadmill exercise Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 1998; 275(5): H1663 - H1672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Duncker, R. Stubenitsky, and P. D. Verdouw Autonomic Control of Vasomotion in the Porcine Coronary Circulation During Treadmill Exercise : Evidence for Feed-Forward ß-Adrenergic Control Circ. Res., June 29, 1998; 82(12): 1312 - 1322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Sambuceti, M. Marzilli, P. Marraccini, J. Schneider-Eicke, E. Gliozheni, O. Parodi, and A. L'Abbate Coronary Vasoconstriction During Myocardial Ischemia Induced by Rises in Metabolic Demand in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Circulation, June 17, 1997; 95(12): 2652 - 2659. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Ishibashi, D. J. Duncker, and R. J. Bache Endogenous Nitric Oxide Masks {alpha}2-Adrenergic Coronary Vasoconstriction During Exercise in the Ischemic Heart Circ. Res., February 1, 1997; 80(2): 196 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||