Articles |
From the Departments of Medicine, Biochemistry, and Anesthesiology and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Correspondence to Augustus O. Grant, MD, Box 3504, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
versus Gß
) has
been disputed. We used Gß
inhibitors derived from the
ß-adrenergic kinase 1 (ßARK1) to assess the relative importance of
Gß
in IK.ACh activation. In rabbit atrial
myocytes, IK.ACh had a conductance of 49±6.2 pS. In
inside-out patches, the mean open time was 1.60±0.57 ms, mean time
constant (
o) was 1.59±0.53 ms, and mean closed
time was 3.02±1.35 ms (n=38). ßARK1 is a
Gß
-sensitive enzyme that interacts with
Gß
through a defined sequence near its carboxyl
terminus. A 28-amino-acid peptide derived from the carboxyl terminus of
ßARK1 (peptide G) increased the closed time to 10.04 ms
(P<.001) and decreased opening probability
(NPo) by 71% (P<.001). Fusion
proteins containing the entire carboxyl terminus of ßARK1,
glutathione S-transferase ßARK1ct and hexahistidine
ßARK1ct, decreased NPo by 67%
(P=.03) and 48% (P=.009), respectively. They
also both significantly increased the closed time. None of the
inhibitors affected mean open time or channel amplitude. A control
peptide derived from a neighboring region of ßARK1 had no significant
effect on IK.ACh activity. These results provide further
evidence for the role of Gß
in the activation of
IK.ACh.
Key Words: muscarinic receptor potassium channel G protein ß-adrenergic receptor kinase
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit (G
-GTP) and a
ß
-subunit (Gß
). Initial inquiry into the
physiological roles of these subunits focused on
G
-GTP as the active component in
signaling.5 6 7 8 Subsequent investigation revealed
Gß
(generally derived from oligomeric
Go/Gi preparations) to be an activator
of IK.ACh,9 10 11 as well as many other
intracellular effectors, including phospholipase A2,
phospholipase C, types II and IV adenylyl cyclase, and the
ß-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 (ßARK1).12 13 14 15 16 17 18 There has
been some dispute regarding the relative importance of
G
versus Gß
in activating
IK.ACh.19 20 21 To further investigate this
issue, we used specific Gß
inhibitors derived from
ßARK1,22 a cytosolic enzyme known to phosphorylate
ß-adrenergic23 and muscarinic cholinergic
receptors.24 The translocation of ßARK1 to the plasma
membrane is stimulated by Gß
, which is
membrane-associated via the geranylgeranyl isoprenoid moiety of the
-subunit.17 18 ßARK1, which lacks its own isoprenyl
group, acquires its membrane affinity by binding
Gß
.17 25 The Gß
binding
site on ßARK1 has been localized to a 125-amino-acid residue region
within its carboxyl terminus.17 18 22 Previous studies
have shown that the carboxyl terminus of ßARK1 can inhibit the
Gß
activation of phospholipase C-ß,26
type II adenylyl cyclase,26 27 and a cloned muscarinic
potassium channel (GIRK) expressed in Xenopus
oocytes.28 In this study, we used these specific
Gß
inhibitors to examine the role of
Gß
in IK.ACh activation in native membrane
patches. | Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preparation of ßARK1 Peptides and Fusion Proteins
The peptides corresponding to amino acids
ala531-tyr553 (peptide A) and to
trp643-ser670 (peptide G) of ßARK1 were
prepared as their amino-terminal acylated and carboxyl-terminal
amidated forms by methods of synthesis and purification previously
described.22 The glutathione S-transferase
(GST) and hexahistidine (His6) fusion proteins
(GST-ßARK1ct and His6-ßARK1ct, respectively) containing
the carboxyl-terminal 222 amino acids of ßARK1
(pro467-leu689) were prepared as
described.17 27 Fig 1
shows the relation of
these peptide and protein Gß
inhibitors to the
carboxyl terminal segment of ßARK1.
|
Solutions and Reagents
The bath solution consisted of (in mmol/L) KCl 140,
MgCl2 2, EGTA-KOH 5, HEPES 5, Na2ATP 0.2 to
0.4, and Na3GTP 0.1. The solution was titrated with KOH to
a pH of 7.3 at 35°C. Micropipettes were filled with a solution
containing (in mmol/L) KCl 140, CaCl2 1, MgCl2
1, and HEPES 5, and ACh (Sigma) at 1 µmol/L. The pH was adjusted to
7.4 with KOH. The composition of the perfusion solution was identical
to that of the bath solution. All solutions were filtered through a
0.22-µm filter. The peptide and protein inhibitors and
Gß
were dissolved in the perfusion solution
immediately before use. Peptide G and peptide A were used at a
concentration of 100 µmol/L. His6-ßARK1ct and
GST-ßARK1ct fusion proteins had concentrations of 20 and 10 µmol/L,
respectively. Bovine brain Gß
was prepared as
previously described and used at a 20-nmol/L
concentration.29
Recording Techniques
Recording micropipettes were fabricated from 1.5-mm-OD
borosilicate glass tubing (6030, A-M Systems, Inc) by use of a
Flaming-Brown P80/PC horizontal puller (Sutter Instrument Co), coated
with Sylgard 184 elastomer (Dow Corning), and fire-polished immediately
before use. Microelectrode resistances ranged from 8 to 10 M
.
Microelectrodes were coupled to the amplifier headstage via a
Teflon-coated Ag/AgCl wire. The bath solution was grounded via a
Ag/AgCl wire immersed in agar gel containing internal solution.
Junction potentials were offset just before the formation of a gigaohm
seal. The recording chamber, bath solution, and perfusion solution were
all maintained at 33°C to 35°C with a bipolar temperature
controller (TC-202, Medical Systems Corp). Gigaohm seals and inside-out
patches were obtained by standard techniques.30 Patches
were held at -80 mV, and currents were measured with an EPC-7
patch-clamp amplifier (List Electronics). Perfusion micropipettes were
fabricated from N-51A borosilicate glass (Drummond Scientific Co) with
an aperture of 30 to 40 µm. Peptide and protein inhibitors were
applied via a pressure injector (PV820 Pneumatic PicoPump, World
Precision Instruments, Inc) through a perfusion micropipette positioned
adjacent to the cell. Current signals were filtered at a corner
frequency of 1.5 kHz with an eight-pole Bessel filter (902LPF,
Frequency Devices) and sampled at 5 kHz.
Data Storage and Analysis
Data acquisition protocols were generated with a Compaq-Prolinea
3/25s personal computer (Compaq Computer Corp) with a TL-1 interface
(Axon Instruments) and customized software. Data were acquired in
500-ms recording frames separated by 1 ms and digitized with an
analog-to-digital interface with 12-bit resolution (DT 2821, Data
Translation) and a Compaq 386-20 computer. Digitized data were analyzed
off-line with a Sun 4/280 microcomputer (Sun Microsystems, Inc). An
automatic threshold detection scheme was used with software developed
in our laboratory. The open-state threshold was set at half the
single-channel amplitude.31 The weighted least-squares fit
to histograms of the open time was used to measure the closing rate. A
bin width of four sampling intervals was used. A minimum
2 procedure was used to assess the fit of the
distribution to a single exponential. Open times were fit by one
exponential, whereas closed times required two exponents. Data
are expressed as mean±sample SD. Student's paired t test
and ANOVA were used to make statistical comparisons.
NPo was calculated as the total number of
channel openings multiplied by the channel opening probability.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
o) of 1.59±0.53 ms. These values for
conductance, mean open time, and
o are similar to those
previously reported for IK.ACh in rabbit atrial
myocytes.32 33 The mean closed time was 3.02±1.35 ms and
was best fit by a double exponential function. The fast time constant
was 1.00 ms, and the slow time constant was 6.10 ms.
|
|
The GTP dependence of IK.ACh in this experimental
preparation was confirmed (Fig 4A
). Patches were excised
in GTP-free solution, resulting in gradual rundown of channel activity.
Compared with NPo when cell-attached, the
relative NPo in excised patches at 1, 3, and 6
minutes was 0.26, 0.08, and 0.06, respectively. Perfusion with 100
µmol/L GTP consistently reactivated patches. Washout of GTP returned
the channels to baseline activity (n=6). There was no significant
difference in either NPo, open time, or
closed time between cell-attached conditions and inside-out patches
with GTP.
|
The stability of inside-out patches in this system was established by
excising patches in GTP-containing solution (Fig 4B
). Stable channel
activity was demonstrated up to 25 minutes after excision (mean, 10.5
minutes; n=4).
To examine the effect of Gß
inhibitors on
IK.ACh kinetics, various peptide and protein constructs
with Gß
binding activity were perfused onto the
inside-out patches. Peptide G contains 28-amino-acid residues derived
from the carboxyl terminus of ßARK1. Application of peptide G (100
µmol/L) consistently resulted in a decrement in channel activity (Fig 5A
). The mean NPo decreased to
29% of the activity during control conditions (P<.001), as
seen in Fig 6
. The mean closed time increased from 3.52
to 10.04 ms (P<.001, n=13). The time constant for the
closed time had a fast component of 0.96 ms and a slow component of
14.21 ms (Fig 3B
). There was no significant change in the mean open
time (Fig 3B
) or in the current amplitude. Washout of peptide G did not
result in a return to baseline activity in any of the trials. However,
application of Gß
(20 nmol/L) consistently reactivated
channel activity (n=3), demonstrating continued patch viability (Fig 5B
).
|
|
To confirm that the effects of peptide G were due to its
Gß
-binding capacity and not a nonspecific inhibitory
property, a second peptide was also examined. Peptide A is derived from
an upstream region of ßARK1 and contains a similar number of amino
acid residues. It has previously been shown that peptide A does not
inhibit Gß
activation of ßARK1.22
Perfusion of peptide A (100 µmol/L) onto excised patches did not
significantly affect channel activity (Fig 5C
). Mean closed time was
2.56 ms in control conditions and 2.82 ms with peptide A
(P=NS, n=5). There was also no significant change in
NPo (Fig 6
), mean open time, or current
amplitude. These results indicate that peptide G does specifically bind
Gß
, resulting in a significant reduction in the
activation of IK.ACh.
To further explore the role of Gß
in signal
transduction, we also used fusion protein inhibitors of
Gß
: GST-ßARK1ct and His6-ßARK1ct. In
four patches, GST-ßARK1ct (10 µmol/L) produced a decrease in
channel activation (Fig 7A
). The mean closed time
increased from 2.24 to 7.4 ms (P=.037). The relative
NPo decreased to 33% of control conditions
(P=.03, Fig 6
). Application of His6-ßARK1ct
(20 µmol/L) also resulted in a decrement in channel activity (n=6,
Fig 7B
). The mean closed time increased from 2.60 to 4.32 ms
(P=.006), and the relative NPo
decreased to 52% of control activity (P=.008, Fig 6
). There
was no significant change in current amplitude or mean open time for
either of these protein constructs.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and
Gß
in regulating IK.ACh has been under
continuing investigation. Heterogeneous G
-GTP
S
preparations,5 6 8 as well as
Gß
,9 10 11 12 have been demonstrated to
activate IK.ACh. G
-GTP
S can
activate IK.ACh in picomolar concentrations, whereas
Gß
requires concentrations in the nanomolar range.
However, it is expected that a permanently active form of the subunit
would be more potent than a more physiologically appropriate transient
form that is continuously cycling between its GDP- and GTP-bound
states. A more relevant though less feasible comparison would be
between G
-GTP and
Gß
.16
It is unclear whether both G
and
Gß
participate in activating IK.ACh in
vivo or whether only one unique subunit is responsible. Evidence for
the role of G
as the physiological activator
derives from two primary sources: (1) diminished agonist activation of
IK.ACh with a monoclonal antibody to the transducin
-subunit7 and (2) inhibition of IK.ACh
activation with Gß
.21 However, further
investigation revealed that the above antibody actually disrupts the
link between receptor and G protein and not the one between the ion
channel and the G protein subunit.34 In addition, an
inhibitory effect of Gß
has not been corroborated by
other investigators. Evidence for the physiological role of
Gß
in activating IK.ACh has come from
several different approaches: (1) Bovine
Gß
9 10 11 12 as well as recombinant
Gß
35 activates IK.ACh. (2)
Both GTP-
S and Gß
activate IK.ACh in a
positive cooperative manner with a similar Hill
coefficient.36 (3) Multiple heterogeneous
G
-GDP preparations and recombinant
G
-GDP diminish IK.ACh activation,
presumably by forming an inactive trimer of the
G
- and
Gß
-subunits.11 28 35 (4) Recent
investigation using heterogeneous G
-GTP
S
preparations at 10 pmol/L to 10 nmol/L concentrations has shown only
weak, inconsistent activation of IK.ACh, with
maximal channel activation only 20% of that induced by GTP-
s or
Gß
.11
We examined the physiological significance of Gß
in
IK.ACh activation by using specific Gß
inhibitors in an isolated cell membrane patch. The inhibitors are
derived from the carboxyl terminal segment of ßARK1. Peptide G is a
28-amino-acid segment that appears to contain the specific residues
critical for Gß
binding to ßARK1. It inhibits
Gß
activation of ßARK1 in rod outer segment membrane
phosphorylation assays with a mean IC50 of 76
µmol/L.22 We showed that peptide G significantly
inhibits IK.ACh in inside-out membrane patches at a
concentration of 100 µmol/L. NPo is decreased
by 71% (P<.001), and closed time is increased
approximately threefold (P<.001). Peptide G appears to bind
Gß
irreversibly, since there is no return to baseline
activity with washout. However, its inhibitory properties are not due
to a nonspecific membrane effect, since application of
Gß
results in a vigorous return of channel activity.
In addition, we examined the properties of a control peptide derived
from a neighboring region of ßARK1 (peptide A), which has no in vitro
effect on Gß
activation of ßARK1.22
This peptide did not change IK.ACh channel activity.
We also used fusion proteins containing a much larger portion of the
ßARK1 carboxyl terminus. His6-ßARK1ct and GST-ßARK1ct
each contain the terminal 222-amino-acid residues of this segment,
linked to a hexahistidine or GST tag, respectively. The hexahistidine
tag is a small polypeptide, whereas GST is a large protein. These tags
enhance purification methods and increase protein stability. The use of
two different tags mitigates, to a degree, their potential to confound
the interpretation of inhibitory effect of the protein. Use of the
fusion proteins allows the entire carboxyl terminus binding domain to
be evaluated. In addition, we can compare our results with those of
other investigations using these protein segments. Previous work has
shown that the cellular expression of the carboxyl terminus of ßARK1
inhibits Gß
activation of phospholipase C-ß and type
II adenylyl cyclase in COS-7 cells.26
His6-ßARK1ct has also been demonstrated to inhibit
Gß
activation of type II adenylyl cyclase in a
permeabilized human embryonic kidney cell system27 as well
as a cloned rat muscarinic potassium channel (GIRK) in
Xenopus oocytes.28
We found that GST-ßARK1ct (10 µmol/L) and
His6-ßARK1ct (20 µmol/L) both affected
IK.ACh activity by significantly decreasing
NPo and increasing the closed time. These
protein constructs were used at concentrations close to their mean
IC50, as assessed by their inhibition of
Gß
activation of ßARK1 phosphorylation
activity.22 At these concentrations, their ability to
inhibit IK.ACh was comparable to the activity of peptide G,
which was used at a concentration near its IC50. However,
since dose-response curves were not performed, we cannot draw definite
conclusions regarding the relative potency of these compounds in
attenuating IK.ACh channel activity.
One potential drawback to the use of these fusion proteins relates to
their large molecular weight. The diffusion and penetration of these
fusion proteins to the active membrane site may not be as efficient as
with the smaller peptides. Further, the His6 and GST tags
could potentially alter the potency of the fusion protein in inhibiting
Gß
, either by steric hindrance or via an
intrinsic property of the tag itself.
This is the first study to assess the effect of peptide G and
GST-ßARK1ct on IK.ACh. Although channel activity was
reduced, it was not abolished. Overall channel activity would depend on
the concentration of agonist and GTP, the rate of hydrolysis of
G
-GTP, and the binding affinity of the
inhibitor to Gß
. Given the persistence of some
residual IK.ACh activity, it is not possible to
definitively conclude that Gß
is the only activator.
However, since multiple investigators have recently demonstrated the
inhibitory capacity of
G
-GDP,11 28 35 residual
IK.ACh activity is most likely due to incomplete
suppression of Gß
.
One previous study assessed the effect of His6-ßARK1ct on
the activity of a cloned rat muscarinic potassium channel (GIRK1),
expressed in Xenopus oocytes along with ß1 and
2.28 NPo was
markedly diminished upon application of this fusion protein to an
excised patch. This effect was more complete than was seen with
His6-ßARK1ct in our preparation (87% versus 48%
reduction compared with control). The concentrations used in the two
studies were similar. There may be a difference in the affinity of
His6-ßARK1ct to ß1
2 compared
with rabbit atrial Gß
. Kleuss et al37
demonstrated that different ß subtypes vary in their ability to
interact with their assigned effector. They concluded that G protein
structural differences are reflective of a functional diversity.
Similarly, different Gß
subunits may vary in their
ability to bind the carboxyl terminal segment of ßARK1. However, the
subtype composition of Gß
in rabbit atrial tissue is
unknown at present.
It is theoretically possible that these inhibitors diminished
IK.ACh activity by acting directly on the channel. However,
we previously showed that peptide G and the fusion proteins
specifically bind Gß
.22 In addition, as
previously discussed, the ßARK1 carboxyl terminus attenuates the
Gß
activation of a variety of other intracellular
effectors, including type II adenylyl cyclase and phospholipase C-ß.
It is unlikely that the inhibitors prevent effector activation by
binding Gß
in some subcellular signaling systems and
act directly on the effector in others. The most consistent
interpretation involves direct inhibition of Gß
.
In summary, application of peptide and fusion protein
Gß
inhibitors results in a significant decrease in
IK.ACh channel activity. Peptide G and the ßARK1 carboxyl
terminal fusion proteins all significantly increased the closed time
and decreased NPo compared with control
conditions. Although a similar result was demonstrated with a cloned
muscarinic potassium channel expressed with heterologous
Gß
, this is the first study to show inhibition
of Gß
-IK.ACh coupling in an intact
membrane system. This represents an important step in enhancing
our understanding of G protein signaling and provides further evidence
for the role of Gß
as a physiological activator of
IK.ACh.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received November 3, 1994; accepted January 23, 1995.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Breitwieser GE, Szabo G. Uncoupling of cardiac muscarinic and ß-adrenergic receptors from ion channels by a guanine nucleotide analogue. Nature. 1985;317:538-540. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Kurachi Y, Nakajima T, Sugimoto T. Acetylcholine activation of K+ channels in cell-free membrane of atrial cells. Am J Physiol. 1986;251:H681-H684.
4.
Yatani A, Codina J, Brown AM, Birnbaumer L. Direct activation
of mammalian atrial muscarinic potassium channels by GTP regulatory
protein GK. Science. 1987;235:207-211.
5.
Codina J, Yatani A, Grenet D, Brown AM, Birnbaumer L. The
subunit of the GTP binding protein GK opens atrial
potassium channels. Science. 1987;236:442-445.
6.
Cerbai E, Klockner U, Isenberg G. The
subunit of the GTP
binding protein activates muscarinic potassium channels of the atrium.
Science. 1988;240:1782-1783.
7.
Yatani A, Hamm H, Codina J, Mazzoni MR, Birnbaumer L, Brown
AM. A monoclonal antibody to the
subunit of GK blocks
muscarinic activation of atrial K+ channels.
Science. 1988;241:828-831.
8.
Yatani A, Mattera R, Codina J, Graf R, Okabe K, Padrell
E, Iyengar R, Brown AM, Birnbaumer L. The G protein-gated atrial
K+ channel is stimulated by three distinct
Gi
-subunits. Nature. 1988;336:680-682. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Logothetis DE, Kurachi Y, Galper J, Neer EJ, Clapham DE. The
ß
subunits of GTP-binding proteins activate the muscarinic
K+ channel in heart. Nature. 1987;325:321-326. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Kurachi Y, Ito H, Sugimoto T, Katada T, Ui M. Activation of
atrial muscarinic K+ channels by low concentrations of
ß
subunits of rat brain G protein. Pflugers Arch. 1989;413:325-327. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Ito H, Tung RT, Sugimoto T, Kobayashi I, Takahashi K, Katada
T, Ui M, Kurachi Y. On the mechanism of G protein ß
subunit
activation of the muscarinic K+ channel in guinea pig
atrial cell membrane. J Gen Physiol. 1992;99:961-983.
12.
Kim D, Lewis DL, Graziadei L, Neer EJ, Bar-Sagi D, Clapham DE.
G-protein ß
-subunits activate the cardiac muscarinic
K+-channel via phospholipase A2.
Nature. 1989;337:557-560. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Boyer JL, Waldo GL, Harden TK. ß
-Subunit activation
of G-protein-regulated phospholipase C. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:25451-25456.
14.
Tang WJ, Gilman AG. Type-specific regulation of adenylyl
cyclase by G protein ß
subunits. Science. 1991;254:1500-1503.
15.
Birnbaumer L. Receptor-to-effector signaling through G
proteins: roles for ß
dimers as well as
subunits.
Cell. 1992;71:1069-1072. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Clapham DE, Neer EJ. New roles for G-protein ß
-dimers in
transmembrane signalling. Nature. 1993;365:403-406. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Pitcher JA, Inglese J, Higgins JB, Arriza JL, Casey PJ, Kim C,
Benovic JL, Kwatra MM, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ. Role of ß
subunits
of G proteins in targeting the ß-adrenergic receptor kinase to
membrane-bound receptors. Science. 1992;257:1264-1267.
18.
Kameyama K, Haga K, Haga T, Kontani K, Katada T, Fukada Y.
Activation by G protein ß
subunits of ß-adrenergic and
muscarinic receptor kinase. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:7753-7758.
19. Bourne HR. `Wrong' subunit regulates cardiac potassium channels. Nature. 1987;325:296-297. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Birnbaumer L, Brown AM. G protein opening of K+ channels. Nature. 1987;327:21. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Okabe K, Yatani A, Evans T, Ho YK, Codina J, Birnbaumer L,
Brown AM. ß
Dimers of G proteins inhibit atrial muscarinic
K+ channels. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:12854-12858.
22.
Koch WJ, Inglese J, Stone WC, Lefkowitz RJ. The binding site
for the ß
subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins on the
ß-adrenergic receptor kinase. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:8256-8260.
23.
Benovic JL, Strasser RH, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ.
ß-Adrenergic receptor kinase: identification of a novel protein
kinase that phosphorylates the agonist-occupied form of the receptor.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986;83:2797-2801.
24. Kwatra MM, Benovic JL, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ, Hosey MM. Phosphorylation of chick heart muscarinic cholinergic receptors by the ß-adrenergic receptor kinase. Biochemistry. 1989;28:4543-4547. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Inglese J, Koch WJ, Caron MG, Lefkowitz RJ. Isoprenylation in regulation of signal transduction by G-protein-coupled receptor kinases. Nature. 1992;359:147-150. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Koch WJ, Hawes BE, Inglese J, Luttrell LM, Lefkowitz RJ.
Cellular expression of the carboxyl terminus of G protein-coupled
receptor kinase attenuates Gß
-mediated signaling.
J Biol Chem. 1994; 269:6193-6197.
27.
Inglese J, Luttrell LM, Iniguez-Lluhi JA, Touhara K, Koch WJ,
Lefkowitz RJ. Functionally active targeting domain of the
ß-adrenergic receptor kinase: an inhibitor of
Gß
-mediated stimulation of type II adenylyl cyclase.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994; 91:3637-3641.
28.
Reuveny E, Slesinger PA, Inglese J, Morales JM, Iniguez-Lluhi
JA, Lefkowitz RJ, Bourne HR, Jan YN, Jan LY. Activation of the cloned
muscarinic potassium channel by G protein ß
subunits.
Nature. 1994;370:143-146. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Casey PJ, Graziano MP, Gilman AG. G protein ß
subunits
from bovine brain and retina: equivalent catalytic support of
ADP-ribosylation of
subunits by pertussis toxin but differential
interactions with Gs
. Biochemistry. 1989;28:611-616. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FJ. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch. 1981; 391:85-100.
31. Colquhoun D, Sigworth FJ. Fitting and statistical analysis of single-channel records. In: Sakmann B, Neher E, eds. Single Channel Recording. New York, NY: Plenum Publishing Corp; 1983:191-263.
32. Soejima M, Noma A. Mode of regulation of the ACh-sensitive K-channel by the muscarinic receptor in rabbit atrial cells. Pflugers Arch. 1984;400:424-431. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Kaibara M, Nakajima T, Irisawa H, Giles W. Regulation of
spontaneous openings of muscarinic K+ channel in rabbit
atrium. J Physiol. 1991;433:589-613.
34. Kurachi Y, Tung RT, Ito H, Nakajima T. G protein activation of cardiac muscarinic K+ channels. Prog Neurobiol. 1992;39:229-246. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Wickman KD, Iniguez-Lluhi JA, Davenport PA, Taussig R,
Krapivinsky GB, Linder ME, Gilman AG, Clapham DE. Recombinant G-protein
ß
-subunits activate the muscarinic- gated atrial potassium
channel. Nature. 1994;368:255-257. [Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Yamada M, Jahangir A, Hosoya Y, Inanobe A, Katada T, Kurach Y.
GK* and brain Gß
activate muscarinic
K+ channel through the same mechanism. J Biol
Chem. 1993;268:24551-24554.
37. Kleuss C, Scherubl H, Hescheler J, Schultz G, Wittig B. Different ß-subunits determine G-protein interaction with transmembrane receptors. Nature. 1992;358:424-426.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Lavine, N. Ethier, J. N. Oak, L. Pei, F. Liu, P. Trieu, R. V. Rebois, M. Bouvier, T. E. Hebert, and H. H. M. Van Tol G Protein-coupled Receptors Form Stable Complexes with Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channels and Adenylyl Cyclase J. Biol. Chem., November 22, 2002; 277(48): 46010 - 46019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Herlitze, J. P. Ruppersberg, and M. D Mark New roles for RGS2, 5 and 8 on the ratio-dependent modulation of recombinant GIRK channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes J. Physiol., June 1, 1999; 517(2): 341 - 352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. VIARD, T. EXNER, U. MAIER, J. MIRONNEAU, B. NÜRNBERG, and N. MACREZ Gß{gamma} dimers stimulate vascular L-type Ca2+ channels via phosphoinositide 3-kinase FASEB J, April 1, 1999; 13(6): 685 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. Macrez, J.-L. Morel, and J. Mironneau Specific Galpha 11beta 3gamma 5 Protein Involvement in Endothelin Receptor-Induced Phosphatidylinositol Hydrolysis and Ca2+ Release in Rat Portal Vein Myocytes Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 1999; 55(4): 684 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
G. Iaccarino, L. A. Smithwick, R. J. Lefkowitz, and W. J. Koch Targeting Gbeta gamma signaling in arterial vascular smooth muscle proliferation: A novel strategy to limit restenosis PNAS, March 30, 1999; 96(7): 3945 - 3950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sorota, I. Rybina, A. Yamamoto, and X.-Y. Du Isoprenaline can activate the acetylcholine-induced K+ current in canine atrial myocytes via Gs-derived {beta}{gamma} subunits J. Physiol., January 15, 1999; 514(2): 413 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Rockman, K. R. Chien, D.-J. Choi, G. Iaccarino, J. J. Hunter, J. Ross Jr., R. J. Lefkowitz, and W. J. Koch Expression of a beta -adrenergic receptor kinase 1 inhibitor prevents the development of myocardial failure in gene-targeted mice PNAS, June 9, 1998; 95(12): 7000 - 7005. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sorota, M. Chlenov, X.-Y. Du, and M. Kagan ATP-Dependent Activation of the Atrial Acetylcholine-Induced K+ Channel Does Not Require Nucleoside Diphosphate Kinase Activity Circ. Res., May 19, 1998; 82(9): 971 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Macrez, J.-L. Morel, F. Kalkbrenner, P. Viard, G. Schultz, and J. Mironneau A beta gamma Dimer Derived from G13 Transduces the Angiotensin AT1 Receptor Signal to Stimulation of Ca2+ Channels in Rat Portal Vein Myocytes J. Biol. Chem., September 12, 1997; 272(37): 23180 - 23185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Hill and E. G. Peralta Inhibition of a Gi-activated Potassium Channel (GIRK1/4) by the Gq-coupled m1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor J. Biol. Chem., February 16, 2001; 276(8): 5505 - 5510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1995 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |