Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 1995;76:812-824

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jabr, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Cole, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jabr, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Cole, W. C.
(Circulation Research. 1995;76:812-824.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Oxygen-Derived Free Radical Stress Activates Nonselective Cation Current in Guinea Pig Ventricular Myocytes

Role of Sulfhydryl Groups

Rita I. Jabr, William C. Cole

From the Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary (Canada).


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract Oxygen-derived free radicals (O-Rs) cause alterations in cardiac electrical activity, including sustained depolarization, which may contribute to arrhythmic activity in reperfusion after ischemia. The ionic current(s) and cellular mechanism(s) underlying the sustained depolarization are not well defined. We used the whole-cell variant of the patch-clamp technique to study sustained depolarization in guinea pig ventricular myocytes during the extracellular application of O-Rs (generating system: dihydroxyfumaric acid, 3 to 6 mmol/L; FeCl3/ADP, 0.05:0.5 mmol/L). Myocytes superfused with O-Rs (pipette EGTA, 0.1 mmol/L) showed (1) sustained depolarization to between -40 and -10 mV, (2) oscillations in membrane potential, and (3) triggered activity. The depolarization resulted from an increase in quasi–steady state difference current reversing at {approx}-18 mV, and the oscillations were due to transient inward current. The latter were inhibited with ryanodine (10 µmol/L) or high pipette EGTA (5 mmol/L), but the steady state current was unaffected. Nonselective cation current (INSC) (recorded with Cs+, Li+, and Mg2+ replacing K+, Na+, and Ca2+, respectively; 20 mmol/L tetraethylammonium chloride [TEA] and 5 mmol/L BAPTA in the pipette solution and 10 mmol/L TEA, 10 µmol/L tetrodotoxin, and 10 µmol/L nicardipine in the bath solution) was activated by O-Rs; the increase in current was unaffected by preventing changes in [Ca2+]i but was inhibited with dithiothreitol. Oxidizing agents (diamide and thimerosal) or caffeine (pipette EGTA, 0.1 mmol/L) produced a similar increase in membrane conductance. INSC activated with O-Rs, oxidizing agents, or caffeine was sensitive to SK&F 96365. O-R treatment was without effect when INSC was already activated with caffeine. The data suggest that (1) extracellular O-Rs activate a Ca2+-sensitive INSC in the absence of changes in [Ca2+]i, (2) oxidative modification of extracellular sulfhydryl groups may be involved, and (3) this mechanism is different from the Ca2+-dependent activation of INSC by intracellular O-Rs, indicating that O-Rs may alter ion channel activity by differential mechanisms, depending on the compartment, extracellular or intracellular, in which they are present.


Key Words: whole-cell steady state current • ventricular myocytes • oxygen-derived free radicals • nonselective cation current • sulfhydryl groups


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Oxygen-derived free radicals (O-Rs) are implicated in myocardial injury during reperfusion after a period of ischemia.1 A burst of O-Rs2 is thought to contribute to reflow arrhythmogenesis3 4 5 6 and contractile dysfunction (stunning).7 Several studies reported alterations in electrical activity in the heart due to exogenous O-R stress, leading to abnormal activity and arrhythmias.8 9 10 11 12 13 14 However, the specific ionic conductances involved and the subcellular changes responsible for altered channel activity during O-R stress remain poorly defined. Furthermore, it is not evident whether the effects of O-Rs in the extracellular compartment are necessarily identical to those induced by reactive species of oxygen in the intracellular compartment.

Theoretically, cardiac membrane currents could be affected by O-R stress as a result of (1) lipid peroxidation and changes in membrane fluidity, (2) direct oxidation of channel proteins or associated regulatory subunits,15 16 or (3) a change in a cytoplasmic regulatory factor, eg, [Ca2+]i.17 18 19 Several studies implicate a rise in [Ca2+]i as an important factor in causing changes in membrane currents during O-R stress.10 11 12 20 For example, sustained depolarization has been observed in intact heart preparations and single isolated myocytes20 21 22 23 ; we found that this change was associated with the activation of a nonselective cation current (INSC) due to an increase in [Ca2+]i resulting from abnormal Ca2+ handling by the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR).20 Intracellular Ca2+ chelation by inclusion of 5 mmol/L EGTA in the whole-cell voltage-clamp patch pipette solution or pretreatment with ryanodine (10 µmol/L) inhibited the change in INSC and sustained depolarization.20

Lipid peroxidation was shown to occur in intact preparations with demonstrable changes in electrical activity.21 However, there is as yet no direct evidence showing alterations in a specific membrane conductance as a result of lipid peroxidation. On the other hand, direct protein oxidation was implicated in studies in which mechanical dysfunction induced by O-R stress was either reversed or prevented by sulfhydryl group reducing agents, such as N-acetylcysteine24 and dithiothreitol (DTT).15 25 Moreover, alterations in the activities of some enzymes and ion transporters were reported to result from O-R–induced oxidative modification of sulfhydryl groups on the proteins. For example, inactivation of the sarcolemmal Ca2+ pump,26 Na+,K+-ATPase,27 and SR Ca2+-ATPase28 29 by O-R stress could be reversed by DTT. Significantly, non–O-R–mediated sulfhydryl group oxidizing agents, such as diamide, were also shown to depress Ca2+- and Na+-ATPase activity.26 27 Direct sulfhydryl modification of a sarcolemmal ion conductance in the heart by O-R leading to abnormal electrical activity has not been previously described.

O-Rs are generated through several different reaction pathways in the intracellular and extracellular compartments of cardiac myocytes.30 Some O-Rs can readily cross cell membranes; eg, superoxide radical will permeate anion channels, and the reactive oxygen metabolite H2O2 is membrane permeant. Other O-Rs are extremely reactive; eg, hydroxyl radical has reaction rates on the order of 0.1 to 10x109 mol-1 · s-1 with most cellular constituents, such as amino acids, sugars, and phospholipids.31 32 For this reason, they are thought to be too reactive to diffuse very far from their sites of generation.31 32 Therefore, it is conceivable that some O-Rs may exert their effects largely within the compartment in which they are generated.8 Phospholipids as well as sulfhydryl groups on proteins within the sarcolemma show differential distribution, and regulatory molecules influencing channel activity are generally confined within one compartment. Therefore, the effects of O-R stress on ion channels or the mechanism involved may vary, depending on the cellular compartment in which the radicals are generated. However, as yet, the only data in support of this hypothesis come from limited experiments on frog myocytes with photoilluminated rose bengal.33 Some differences in action potential configuration were evident, but the underlying changes in ionic conductances were not assessed. No studies involving mammalian myocytes have as yet explored the possibility of differential influences of extracellular versus intracellular O-R stress in myocytes from the same species by use of an identical O-R–generating system and recording conditions.

In the present study, we sought to determine the effects of extracellular O-R stress on membrane potential and steady state membrane currents in guinea pig ventricular myocytes and to identify the mechanism(s) responsible for the changes in ion channel activity. To permit comparisons with our previous experiments involving intracellular O-R stress20 and to probe for differential effects of O-Rs related to the cellular compartment in which the reactive species were generated, we used an identical generating system and recording conditions. The present study focuses on the mechanism by which extracellular O-Rs activate nonselective cation current and contribute to sustained depolarization. Changes in other currents are not addressed in detail.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Cell Isolation
Guinea pigs (250 to 450 g) were anesthetized with CO2 and then killed by cervical dislocation. Their hearts were quickly removed and placed in well-aerated ice-cold Krebs-Henseleit solution (K-H) containing (mmol/L) NaCl 120, NaHCO3 25, KCl 4.8, NaH2PO4 1.2, MgSO4 1.2, glucose 11, taurine 13, and CaCl2 1.8 (pH 7.4 with 95% O2/5% CO2) before mounting on a Langendorff apparatus. The atria were removed during perfusion in a retrograde fashion with K-H (37°C) at a constant pressure for a stabilization period of 10 to 15 minutes. Single ventricular myocytes were isolated by using a modified version of an enzymatic dispersion technique34 ; ventricles were initially perfused with nominally Ca2+-free modified MEM-Joklik (GIBCO BRL, Life Technologies Inc) solution for 10 minutes before perfusing in a recirculating manner at a rate of 14 to 15 mL/min with collagenase (74.52 U/mL, Worthington Biochemical Corp), hyaluronidase (0.6 mg/mL, Sigma Chemical Co), and trypsin inhibitor (0.2 mg/mL, Sigma) added to 50 µmol/L Ca2+-modified MEM-Joklik solution for 20 to 30 minutes. Both ventricles were then removed, placed in 50 µmol/L Ca2+–containing MEM-Joklik solution, and cut into small pieces (2 mm3). After a final wash in 50 µmol/L Ca2+–containing MEM-Joklik solution, the tissues were stored in medium 199 at room temperature, and single myocytes were obtained when needed by gentle trituration.

Whole-Cell Recordings
Isolated guinea pig ventricular myocytes were placed in a recording chamber and superfused with the bath solution at a flow rate of 1.8 mL/min (the time required for effective changes in the bath solution was {approx}15 seconds, based on the time required for a stable shift in resting membrane potential with a jump from 4.8 to 9.6 mmol/L [K+]o). Only rod-shaped myocytes that had clear and distinct striations and demonstrated marked shortening and relaxation upon stimulation were used. All experiments were performed at 22°C.

The whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique35 was used for voltage- and current-clamp recordings with a model 8900 patch-clamp amplifier (Dagan Corp). Patch pipettes were pulled with a model P-87 puller (Sutter Instruments) and fire-polished to a final resistance of {approx}0.5 M{Omega} when filled with a control pipette solution. The pipette tip was positioned above the cell, and the pipette potential and capacitance were nullified. After the patch membrane was ruptured, the series resistance (1.0 to 5.0 M{Omega}) and cell capacitance were compensated. Membrane voltage and whole-cell currents (filtered at 1 kHz) were recorded directly to hard disk via an A/D convertor (TL-1-125 LabMaster, Axon Instruments) interfaced with an IBM-clone computer running PCLAMP software (Axon Instruments). Data analysis was performed with PCLAMP (CLAMPFIT). Since the pipette potentials were nulled in external solution, current-clamp tracings and voltage-clamp protocols were corrected for junction potential in the different experimental conditions used. An average value for junction potential was determined for several pipettes in each recording condition by nulling in the pipette solution before the pipettes were transferred to the external solution and the pipette potential was recorded. Junction potential values of +10.0±1.8 mV (n=16 pipettes) for the potassium gluconate pipette/NaCl bath and -7.8±0.4 mV (n=18 pipettes) for the CsCl pipette/NaCl or LiCl bath were obtained.

Solutions
The exogenous free radical–generating system consisted of dihydroxyfumaric acid (3 to 6 mmol/L) and FeCl3/ADP (0.05:0.5 mmol/L), which were added to the bath solution (pH readjusted to 7.4 with NaOH). To record action potentials and whole-cell net membrane current, the bath solution contained (mmol/L) NaCl 120, NaHCO3 3.6, KCl 4.8, NaH2PO4 1.2, MgSO4 1.2, glucose 11, CaCl2 1.8, and HEPES 5 (pH 7.4 with NaOH), and the pipette solution contained (mmol/L) potassium gluconate 130, KCl 10, MgCl2 1, Na2ATP 5, EGTA 0.1, and HEPES 5 (pH 7.2 with KOH). In some experiments, Ca2+ chelation in the intracellular compartment was increased by including 5 mmol/L EGTA or BAPTA in the pipette solution. To isolate INSC, the whole-cell pipette solution contained (mmol/L) CsCl 140, MgCl2 1, Na2ATP 5, tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA) 20, EGTA 0.1 or 5, and HEPES 5 (pH 7.2 with CsOH), and the bath solution contained (mmol/L) NaCl 120, NaHCO3 3.6, NaH2PO4 1.2, CsCl 4.8, CaCl2 1.8, MgSO4 1.2, HEPES 5, TEA 10, BaCl2 0.2, nicardipine 10 µmol/L, and tetrodotoxin (TTX) 10 µmol/L (pH 7.4 with NaOH; equilibrium potential of Cl- [ECl], +3.9 mV). In several experiments, Na+-Ca2+ exchange current was also blocked by equimolar replacement of Na+ and Ca2+ in the bath with Li+ and Mg2+ (pH adjusted to 7.4 with LiOH), respectively, and 5 mmol/L BAPTA in the pipette. Under these conditions, ECl was shifted from -60.4 to +3.1 mV and K+, Na+, and L-type Ca2+ currents were suppressed. In a limited number of experiments, K+ and Na+ in the bath and pipette were completely replaced with TEA, and Cl- was maintained (pH 7.4 and 7.2 with TEA-OH, respectively).

Drugs
MEM-Joklik solution and medium 199 were purchased from GIBCO. Nicardipine (10 µmol/L) was purchased from Research Biochemicals Inc. Ryanodine (10 µmol/L) and SK&F 96365 (100 µmol/L) were purchased from Calbiochem Corp. All other chemicals were purchased from Sigma.

Data Analysis
Data were expressed as mean±SEM. Statistical analysis was performed by using paired or unpaired Student's t test for single comparisons and ANOVA followed Dunnett's test for multiple comparisons as indicated in text.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The whole-cell recording technique was used to monitor the time-dependent changes in electrical activity and net quasi–steady state membrane currents of isolated guinea pig ventricular myocytes during exposure to O-Rs. A low concentration of EGTA (0.1 mmol/L) was included in the pipette solution in an attempt to preserve [Ca2+]i fluctuations and contractions upon electrical stimulation. Experiments were conducted at 22°C to slow the progression of changes in electrical activity during exposure to O-Rs and to provide time to record the underlying alterations in membrane current by switching from current-clamp to voltage-clamp mode. Fig 1ADown shows that O-R stress depolarized resting membrane potential, depressed plateau voltage, prolonged action potential duration (tracing b), and caused low- amplitude oscillations in membrane potential (tracing c) compared with control conditions (tracing a). After the initial depolarization, myocytes failed to repolarize after an action potential and showed a sustained depolarization to between -40 and -10 mV (tracing d). These changes were observed in an additional 17 myocytes, and on average, the sustained depolarization occurred after 4.8±0.9 minutes of O-R exposure and did not show any reversal for more than an additional 15 minutes (as opposed to the transient period of sustained depolarization during intracellular O-R stress20 ). In 14 of 18 myocytes, delayed afterdepolarizations (DADs) and triggered activity occurred before the period of sustained depolarization. These findings are similar to those reported for canine myocytes impaled with conventional microelectrodes and exposed to a similar generating system.36



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Effects of oxygen-derived free radical (O-R) stress on membrane electrical activity and quasi–steady state current. A, Representative current-clamp recordings obtained from a single myocyte dialyzed with 0.1 mmol/L EGTA (stimulation frequency, 0.25 Hz). Tracing a was obtained upon gaining whole-cell access, and tracings b, c, and d were obtained after 9.2, 11, and 12.8 minutes of superfusion with O-Rs, respectively. B, Tracings a, b, and c were quasi–steady state currents obtained from the same myocyte after current-clamp recordings a, c, and d of panel A, respectively. Membrane potential was ramped between -130 and +30 mV over 8 s from a holding potential of -85 mV (data shown are from -120 to +30 mV). Note the positive shift in reversal potential of steady state current, the increase in outward current positive to -20 mV, the negative shift in the holding current, and the transient inward currents evoked after stepping back to the holding potential in tracings b and c. C, Difference current obtained by digital subtraction of tracing a from tracing c in panel B. The reversal potential of the difference current in this myocyte was -28.4 mV.

To determine the change in membrane conductance underlying the sustained depolarization, a ramp protocol was applied to determine the quasi–steady state current-voltage (I-V) relation between -130 and +30 mV (8-s ramp from a holding potential of -85 mV; ramp rate, 20 mV/s). Fig 1BUp shows the changes in net quasi–steady state current during extracellular O-R stress. Under control conditions, the quasi–steady state I-V relation displayed a typical N-shaped appearance, and in most cells the current had two reversal potentials with a positive slope conductance (reversal potential [Er]), corresponding to stable membrane potentials at rest (-75 to -80 mV) and during the plateau ({approx}+10 mV) (eg, Fig 1BUp). Compared with a control recording (tracing a), those obtained during the sustained depolarization (tracings b and c) had the following changes: (1) a positive shift in the more negative Er and a negative shift in the more positive Er of the I-V relation so that the two Er moved together with time (eg, Fig 2BDown) and only a single Er was present at {approx}-30 to -10 mV, when stable depolarization was observed (eg, Figs 1BUp and 3BDown) (average values for Er are given in Table 1Down; only the more negative value for Er under control conditions is indicated to contrast the difference between normal resting potential and sustained depolarization during O-R stress), (2) a negative shift in the holding current at -85 mV, and (3) inward oscillations of membrane current or transient inward current (Iti), observed upon stepping back to -85 mV at the end of the ramp. These changes in steady-state current showed no evidence of reversal for an additional 15 minutes of recording.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effects of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ depletion on oxygen-derived free radical (O-R)–induced alterations in electrical activity and quasi–steady state currents. A, Action potentials recorded from a single myocyte pretreated with 10 µmol/L ryanodine and dialyzed with 0.1 mmol/L EGTA (stimulation frequency, 0.25 Hz). Tracing a was obtained immediately after gaining cell access, whereas tracings b and c were obtained after 4.7 and 4.8 minutes of O-R superfusion, respectively. B, Quasi–steady state currents evoked by 8-s ramp protocol between -130 and +30 mV in the same myocyte as in panel A (data shown are for -120 to +30 mV). Tracings a and b were obtained after tracings a and c in panel A, respectively. Note the similarity of these recordings to those in Fig 1Up, except for the absence of transient inward currents evoked upon stepping back to holding potential. C, Difference current obtained by digital subtraction of tracing a from tracing b in panel B. The reversal potential of the difference current in this myocyte was -24.3 mV.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effects of intracellular Ca2+ chelation on oxygen-derived free radical (O-R)–induced alterations in electrical activity and quasi–steady state currents. A, Action potentials recorded from a single myocyte dialyzed with 5 mmol/L EGTA (stimulation frequency, 0.25 Hz). Tracing a was recorded immediately after gaining cell access, and tracings b and c were obtained after 0.5 and 2.33 minutes of superfusion with O-Rs, respectively. B, Quasi–steady state currents evoked by 8-s ramp protocol between -130 and +30 mV in the same myocyte (data shown are for -120 to +30 mV). Tracings a and b were obtained after tracings a and c in panel A, respectively. Note the similarity to data in Fig 1Up, except for the absence of transient inward currents evoked upon stepping back to the holding potential. C, Difference current obtained by digital subtraction of tracing a from tracing b of panel B. The reversal potential of the difference current in this myocyte was -23.8 mV.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Reversal Potential for Quasi–Steady State Current-Voltage Relation and Oxygen-Derived Free Radical–Sensitive Difference Current During Extracellular Oxygen-Derived Free Radical Stress±Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+ Depletion or [Ca2+]i Chelation

To determine the change in steady state current(s) responsible for the change in steady state I-V relation, the O-R–sensitive difference current was calculated by digital subtraction of tracings recorded before from those obtained during O-R stress (eg, Fig 1CUp represents tracing c minus tracing a of Fig 1BUp). The difference current possessed an Er of -28.4 mV in this myocyte. Similar results were obtained from an additional five myocytes, and average values for Er of the difference current are given in Table 1Up. Since the current was recorded in the absence of blockers, it could represent changes in one or more ionic conductances.

We previously found that intracellular O-R stress caused a transient period of sustained depolarization in guinea pig ventricular myocytes due to activation of Ca2+-sensitive INSC. The change in conductance was attributed to elevated [Ca2+]i due to mishandling of Ca2+ by the SR; ryanodine pretreatment or intracellular Ca2+ chelation with high EGTA (5 mmol/L) inhibited the alterations in membrane potential and current.20 The change in the shape of the I-V relation and the average value of Er for the difference current ({approx}-18 mV) for the present data were similar to those values previously reported by us to occur during intracellular O-R stress20 and by others to occur during elevations in [Ca2+]i37 38 and were attributed to the activation of a Ca2+-sensitive nonselective cation conductance (INSC). For this reason, we determined whether similar alterations in [Ca2+]i were involved in the response to extracellular O-R stress.

Myocytes were pretreated with 10 µmol/L ryanodine39 for 30 minutes before O-R stress, and in a second set of separate experiments, the concentration of EGTA in the pipette was increased to 5 mmol/L to chelate intracellular Ca2+. Comparison of Fig 2AUp with Fig 1AUp shows that qualitatively similar changes in electrical activity were obtained despite pretreatment with ryanodine, depolarization, prolongation of action potential duration, and depression in plateau amplitude followed by a period of sustained depolarization. Under voltage-clamp conditions, the positive shift in the negative Er of the control steady state I-V relation and the negative shift in the holding current were unaffected by ryanodine (Fig 2Up). However, we never observed DADs, oscillations in membrane potential, or Iti after pretreatment with ryanodine. The difference current (Fig 2CUp), obtained by digital subtraction of control from O-R tracings, had an I-V relation that reversed at -24.3 mV in the myocyte shown and, on average, was not statistically different from that obtained in the absence of ryanodine (Table 1Up). These data exclude abnormal Ca2+ release from SR as a requirement for sustained depolarization and the change in steady state difference current during extracellular O-R stress.

Whether the change induced by extracellular O-R stress was due to an increase in [Ca2+]i derived from a Ca2+ source other than the SR was explored by dialyzing myocytes with a higher concentration of EGTA (5 mmol/L). Fig 3Up shows that 5 mmol/L EGTA failed to suppress the changes in action potential configuration, resting potential, and steady state current induced by O-Rs. The average value for Er of the steady state current from four myocytes is shown in Table 1Up and was not statistically different from that obtained with low EGTA in the pipette solution. However, as with the ryanodine experiments, myocytes dialyzed with 5 mmol/L EGTA failed to exhibit DADs, low-amplitude oscillations in membrane potential, or Iti. These data suggest that the sustained depolarization and change in steady state current during extracellular O-R stress did not require an increase in [Ca2+]i.

To determine whether INSC was activated and the role of [Ca2+]i in the change in conductance, the previous experiments with ryanodine and EGTA were repeated by using recording conditions to isolate the current. Nicardipine (10 µmol/L) and TTX (10 µmol/L) were used to block L-type Ca2+ and Na+ currents, respectively. K+ currents were inhibited by adding 10 mmol/L TEA and 0.2 mmol/L BaCl2 to the bath solution and 20 mmol/L TEA to the pipette solution and by replacing K+ in both solutions with an equimolar concentration of Cs+. Under these conditions, ECl was shifted to +3.9 mV from a value of -60.4 mV for the potassium gluconate pipette and NaCl bath solutions. Fig 4Down shows results from a myocyte pretreated with ryanodine (10 µmol/L). O-R stress caused the activation of a steady state current, which reversed at +1.6 mV in this myocyte. Average values for Er of the difference current from five myocytes pretreated with ryanodine are given in Table 2Down. Fig 5Down shows similar changes in the steady state I-V relation in a myocyte dialyzed with a pipette solution containing 5 mmol/L EGTA. The average value for Er of steady state current in four myocytes was not statistically different from that obtained from myocytes dialyzed with 0.1 mmol/L EGTA (Table 2Down). The effects of extracellular O-R on INSC after pretreatment with ryanodine and high EGTA were therefore consistent with the net whole-cell current data. However, we were concerned that a localized increase in [Ca2+]i in the subsarcolemmal space, resulting from Ca2+ entry through Na+-Ca2+ exchange,40 might have occurred. This increase in [Ca2+]i might have activated INSC because of an inadequate intracellular Ca2+ chelation by EGTA. We sought to rule this out by (1) dialyzing myocytes with 5 mmol/L BAPTA, a Ca2+ chelator known to have a higher Ca2+ binding affinity than EGTA,41 and (2) equimolar substitution of Na+ and Ca2+ with Li+ and Mg2+, respectively, to block the exchanger. ECl was +3.1 mV under these conditions. Fig 6Down shows that a myocyte superfused with O-R under these conditions still exhibited a positive shift in Er (panel A). The Er of the difference current was -0.7 mV in this myocyte, and similar results were obtained in another seven myocytes. Average values for Er are given in Table 2Down. On average, membrane conductance before O-R treatment was low (0.31±0.05 nS) and showed zero current at {approx}-38 mV. A positive shift in Er to {approx}-3 mV, due to the activation of a difference current with an Er of +3 mV, was observed after 5.9±1.5 minutes of exposure to O-R. This latency was not statistically different from that required for (1) the change in Er with high EGTA and both Ca2+ and Na+ in the bath solution or (2) the sustained depolarization in current-clamp recordings (P>.05, by ANOVA). This same recording condition was used in all subsequent experiments unless specified otherwise.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Lack of effect of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ depletion on oxygen-derived free radical (O-R)–induced activation of the nonselective cation current (INSC). A, Quasi–steady state current recordings evoked by a ramp protocol (from -112 to +48 mV over 8 s from a holding potential of -67 mV) before and after activation of INSC by extracellular O-Rs (L-type Ca2+, Na+, and all K+ currents were suppressed with nicardipine, tetrodotoxin, Ba2+, tetraethylammonium chloride, and Cs+ replacement for K+; see text for additional details). Tracing a was obtained immediately after gaining cell access from a myocyte pretreated with 10 µmol/L ryanodine and dialyzed with 0.1 mmol/L EGTA. Tracing b was obtained 5 minutes after superfusion with O-Rs. Note positive shift in reversal potential of steady state current, reflecting activation of INSC. B, Difference current obtained by digital subtraction of tracing a from tracing b in panel B. The reversal potential of the difference current in this myocyte was +1.6 mV.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Reversal Potential Shift Due to Nonselective Cation Current During Extracellular Oxygen-Derived Free Radical Stress With Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+ Depletion, [Ca2+]i Chelation, and Replacement of External Ca2+



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Lack of effect of intracellular chelation of Ca2+ on oxygen-derived free radical (O-R)–induced activation of the nonselective cation current (INSC). A, Quasi–steady state current recordings evoked by a ramp protocol (from -112 to +48 mV over 8 s from a holding potential of -67 mV; L-type Ca2+, Na+, and all K+ currents were suppressed with nicardipine, tetrodotoxin, Ba2+, tetraethylammonium chloride, and Cs+ replacement for K+; see text for additional details). Tracings a and b were obtained before and 8.7 minutes after superfusion with O-Rs, respectively. Note the positive shift in the reversal potential of steady state current, reflecting activation of INSC. B, Difference current obtained by digital subtraction of tracing a from tracing b in panel B. The reversal potential of the difference current in this myocyte was +0.8 mV.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Lack of effect of intracellular chelation of Ca2+ with 5 mmol/L BAPTA on oxygen-derived free radical (O-R)–induced activation of the nonselective cation current (INSC). A, Quasi–steady state current recordings evoked by a ramp protocol (from -112 to +48 mV over 8 s from a holding potential of -67 mV; L-type Ca2+, Na+, Na+-Ca2+ exchanger, and all K+ currents were suppressed with nicardipine, tetrodotoxin, Ba2+, tetraethylammonium chloride, and Mg2+, Li+, and Cs+ replacement for Ca2+, Na+, and K+; see text for additional details). Tracings a and b were obtained from a myocyte dialyzed with 5 mmol/L BAPTA before and after 10.2 minutes of O-R superfusion, respectively. Note positive shift in reversal potential of steady state current, reflecting activation of INSC. Difference current was obtained by digital subtraction of tracing a from tracing b in panel A. The reversal potential of the difference current in this myocyte was -0.7 mV.

Three sets of control experiments were performed to discount a role for (1) altered Cl- current, (2) nonspecific leak current, or (3) seal resistance in the change in membrane current during O-R exposure. First, Li+ and Cs+ in the bath and pipette were completely replaced with TEA, but Cl- concentrations were maintained. Under these conditions, no change in membrane current was observed within 10 to 15 minutes of exposure to O-Rs (n=3; data not shown). Second, whether there was any change in membrane conductance with time in the absence of O-R was determined. Representative recordings are shown in Fig 7Down; in three myocytes, no change was observed within 29.0±3.6 minutes, a considerably longer time period compared with that required for the changes induced by O-R exposure. Finally, Fig 7BDown shows a lack of change in recordings obtained in the cell-attached configuration during a 20-mV test pulse from -67 mV before and after O-R stress. On average, seal resistance was 12.9±1.5 G{Omega} before and 11.5±1.2 G{Omega} after 25.5±2.5 minutes of O-R stress in four myocytes. These values were not statistically different (P>.05, by paired Student's t test).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Lack of change in membrane current in the absence of oxygen-derived free radical (O-R) stress and failure of O-R stress to alter seal resistance. A, Quasi–steady state current recordings evoked by a ramp protocol (from -112 to +48 mV over 8 s from a holding potential of -67 mV; L-type Ca2+, Na+, Na+-Ca2+ exchanger, and all K+ currents were suppressed with nicardipine, tetrodotoxin, Ba2+, tetraethylammonium chloride, and Mg2+, Li+, and Cs+ replacement for Ca2+, Na+, and K+; see text for additional details). Tracings a and b were obtained from a myocyte dialyzed with 5 mmol/L BAPTA after 2 minutes of gaining cell access and after 16.4 minutes of superfusion with bath solution (ie, no O-R stress), respectively. Note the absence of any change in membrane current in the absence of O-R stress. B, Current responses during 20-ms steps to -47 mV from a holding potential of -67 mV in the cell-attached configuration with bath and pipette solutions identical to those in panel A. The upper tracing was obtained after gigaseal formation (10.6 G{Omega}), and the lower tracing was obtained after 21.5 minutes (10.0 G{Omega}) of exposure to O-R stress.

Given the absence of any role for [Ca2+]i in the activation of INSC due to extracellular O-Rs, the possibility of direct oxidative modification was tested with the sulfhydryl group reducing agent, DTT.15 26 27 28 29 42 DTT was used in two different ways: (1) myocytes were pretreated with DTT (1 mmol/L) for 30 minutes and then exposed to O-Rs, or (2) myocytes were exposed to O-Rs and then to DTT. Fig 8Down shows that O-R stress failed to activate INSC in a myocyte pretreated with DTT, and similar results were obtained in three other myocytes. In all cases, the time over which the current failed to change was much longer (25±1.1 minutes) than that required for the effects of O-Rs. Fig 9Down shows that DTT in the continued presence of O-Rs inhibited the changes in INSC; the positive shift in Er for the steady state current and the negative shift in the holding current were both reversed. The average value of Er for the difference current after DTT (-42.3±3.4 mV, n=4) was significantly different from that during (P<.05, by ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test) but not different from that before O-R stress (control and O-R values in Table 3Down, P>.05 by ANOVA).



View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Pretreatment with dithiothreitol (DTT, 1 mmol/L) prevents activation of the nonselective cation current (INSC) by oxygen-derived free radicals (O-Rs). Quasi–steady state current recordings were evoked by a ramp protocol (from -112 to +48 mV over 8 s from a holding potential of -67 mV; L-type Ca2+, Na+, Na+-Ca2+ exchanger, and all K+ currents were suppressed with nicardipine, tetrodotoxin, Ba2+, tetraethylammonium chloride, and Mg2+, Li+, and Cs+ replacement for Ca2+, Na+, and K+; see text for additional details). Tracings a and b were obtained from a myocyte pretreated with DTT and dialyzed with 5 mmol/L BAPTA before and after 26 minutes of O-R superfusion, respectively. Note the absence of any change in INSC or the reversal potential for the current-voltage relation.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Dithiothreitol (DTT, 1 mmol/L) inhibits the nonselective cation current (INSC)s activated by oxygen-derived free radical (O-R) stress. A, Quasi–steady state membrane current recordings evoked by a ramp protocol (-112 and +48 mV over 8 s from a holding potential of -67 mV) in a myocyte dialyzed with 5 mmol/L BAPTA (L-type Ca2+, Na+, Na+-Ca2+ exchanger, and all K+ currents were suppressed with nicardipine, tetrodotoxin, Ba2+, tetraethylammonium chloride, and Mg2+, Li+, and Cs+ replacement for Ca2+, Na+, and K+; see text for additional details). Tracing a was obtained before O-R exposure; tracing b, after 3.6 minutes of O-R superfusion; and tracing c, after 3.6 minutes of exposure to DTT in the continued presence of O-Rs. Note that the increase in membrane conductance and the positive shift in the reversal potential (Er) for the steady state current upon O-R stress are reversed with DTT. B, Difference currents obtained by digital subtraction of tracing a from either tracing b or tracing c of panel A. Note the negative shift in Er of the difference current in this myocyte from -0.2 mV during O-R stress to -43.5 mV after DTT.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Shift in Reversal Potential Due to Nonselective Cation Current Induced by Extracellular Oxygen-Derived Free Radical, Diamide, Thimerosal, and Caffeine

If an oxidation of sulfhydryl groups was involved in the response to O-Rs, then similar changes in membrane conductance would be expected for non–O-R–oxidizing agents, such as diamide43 44 or thimerosal.45 46 Indeed, diamide (0.5 mmol/L) induced changes in the steady state I-V relation identical to those of O-R stress (Fig 10Down). The difference current activated by diamide possessed an Er of +5.1 mV in the myocyte shown (Fig 10BDown), and an average value is given in Table 3Up. The positive shift in Er due to diamide was reversed after superfusion with DTT (1 mmol/L) in the continued presence of diamide (Fig 10Down). Similar results were obtained from an additional five myocytes. After DTT, Er returned to -45.3±5.2 mV, which was not significantly different (P>.05, by ANOVA) from control conditions but different (P<.05, by ANOVA followed by Dunnett's test) from conditions in the presence of diamide (values for control and diamide are shown in Table 3Up). The average value of Er (Table 3Up) and the time required (3.9±0.8 minutes) for activation of the diamidesensitive current were not statistically different from values obtained after extracellular O-R exposure (P>.05, by ANOVA). Diamide was without effect on membrane conductance when Li+ and Cs+ were completely replaced with TEA but Cl- was maintained in the bath and pipette (n=3; data not shown).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10. Dithiothreitol (DTT, 1 mmol/L) inhibits the nonselective cation current (INSC) activated by diamide (0.5 mmol/L). A, Quasi–steady state membrane current recordings evoked by a ramp protocol (-112 and +48 mV over 8 s from a holding potential of -67 mV) in a myocyte dialyzed with 5 mmol/L BAPTA (L-type Ca2+, Na+, Na+-Ca2+ exchanger, and all K+ currents were suppressed with nicardipine, tetrodotoxin, Ba2+, tetraethylammonium chloride, and Mg2+, Li+, and Cs+ replacement for Ca2+, Na+, and K+; see text for additional details). Tracing a was obtained before and tracing b was obtained 4.5 minutes after diamide exposure. Tracing c was obtained after 4.8 minutes of superfusion with DTT (1 mmol/L) in the continued presence of diamide. Note the positive shift in the reversal potential (Er) of steady state current during diamide and its return toward the control condition after DTT. B, Difference current obtained by digital subtraction of tracing a (control) from either tracing b (diamide) or tracing c (DTT and diamide) in panel A. Er of the difference current during diamide in this myocyte was +5.1 mV; after DTT it was -38.1 mV.

Fig 11Down shows representative recordings of the effects of the hydrophilic membrane-impermeant sulfhydryl group oxidant thimerosal (5 µmol/L). An increase in conductance was observed that was due to a difference current with an Er of +2.8 mV in the myocyte shown (Fig 11BDown). A similar increase in current was observed in seven additional myocytes, and average values for Er in control conditions and in the presence of thimerosal are given in Table 3Up. On average, the shift in Er was observed after 3.5±0.9 minutes of treatment. This value was not statistically different from that required for sustained depolarization and the shift in Er during O-R stress (P>.05, by ANOVA). Fig 11Down also shows that DTT (1 mmol/L) inhibited the current in the continued presence of thimerosal (Fig 11ADown), and pretreatment with DTT prevented subsequent activation of INSC by thimerosal (Fig 11CDown). Similar results were obtained in two myocytes exposed to DTT after thimerosal and in four myocytes pretreated with DTT. No change in membrane current was observed for 13.3±1.9 minutes during thimerosal exposure after DTT pretreatment; this time was much longer than that required for thimerosal to affect INSC.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 11. Activation of the nonselective cation current (INSC) by the membrane-impermeant oxidizing agent thimerosal (5 µmol/L) and inhibition of current by dithiothreitol (DTT, 1 mmol/L). A, Quasi–steady state membrane current recordings evoked by a ramp protocol (-112 and +48 mV over 8 s from a holding potential of -67 mV) in a myocyte dialyzed with 5 mmol/L BAPTA (L-type Ca2+, Na+, Na+-Ca2+ exchanger, and all K+ currents were suppressed with nicardipine, tetrodotoxin, Ba2+, tetraethylammonium chloride, and Mg2+, Li+, and Cs+ replacement for Ca2+, Na+, and K+; see text for additional details). Tracing a was obtained before and tracing b was obtained 3.6 minutes after thimerosal exposure (5 µmol/L). Tracing c was obtained after 4.3 minutes of DTT (1 mmol/L) in the continued presence of thimerosal. Note the positive shift in the reversal potential (Er) of steady state current during diamide and its return toward the control condition after DTT superfusion. B, Difference current obtained by digital subtraction of tracing a (control) from tracing b (thimerosal) in panel A. Er of the difference current during thimerosal in this myocyte was +2.8 mV. C, A separate myocyte under recording conditions similar to those in panel A but after 10 minutes of pretreatment with DTT (1 mmol/L); tracing a was obtained before and tracing b was obtained after 12.5 minutes of exposure to thimerosal (5 µmol/L). Note the absence of any change in membrane conductance despite the longer exposure to thimerosal compared with panel A.

Some variability in the current activated by O-Rs, diamide, and thimerosal was evident. INSC in several (three of eight O-R–treated, two of six diamide-treated, and six of eight thimerosal-treated) myocytes showed evidence of voltage dependence. This varied from the slight outward rectification as shown in Fig 6BUp to the marked voltage dependence and relaxation of current after the ramp in Fig 11BUp. Myocytes pretreated with ryanodine (five of six) or dialyzed with 5 mmol/L EGTA (two of six) also demonstrated slight voltage dependence during O-R stress.

Fig 12Down shows representative examples of the effect of SK&F 96365 (100 µmol/L), an inhibitor of receptor-operated cation channels,47 and Ca2+-activated nonselective cation channels48 on INSC activated by O-Rs, diamide, and thimerosal. This compound inhibited the effects of O-Rs or the oxidants regardless of whether the membrane current exhibited voltage dependence (Fig 12ADown and 12CDown) or was largely ohmic (Fig 12BDown). Similar results were obtained from an additional five, three, and three myocytes, and on average, current at +48 mV decreased by 95.6±3.5%, 92.1±4.5%, and 81.2±8.9% with SK&F 96365 during O-R, diamide, and thimerosal treatment, respectively.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 12. Inhibition of the nonselective cation current (INSC) activated by oxygen-derived free radicals (O-Rs), diamide, and thimerosal by SK&F 96365 (100 µmol/L). A, Quasi–steady state membrane current recordings evoked by a ramp protocol (-112 and +48 mV over 8 s from a holding potential of -67 mV) in a myocyte dialyzed with 5 mmol/L BAPTA (L-type Ca2+, Na+, Na+-Ca2+ exchanger, and all K+ currents were suppressed with nicardipine, tetrodotoxin, Ba2+, tetraethylammonium chloride, and Mg2+, Li+, and Cs+ replacement for Ca2+, Na+, and K+; see text for additional details). Tracing a was obtained before and tracing b was obtained after 5.3 minutes of O-R stress. Tracings c and d show time-dependent inhibition of INSC by SK&F 96365 (SKF, 100 µmol/L) at 1.5 and 3.0 minutes of treatment, respectively, in the continued presence of O-R stress. B, A separate myocyte under recording conditions similar to those in panel A, but tracings a and b were obtained before and after 4.2 minutes of diamide (0.5 mmol/L) exposure, respectively. Tracing c was obtained after 2.8 minutes of SKF in the continued presence of diamide. C, A separate myocyte under recording conditions similar to those in panel A, but tracings a and b were obtained before and after 3.0 minutes of thimerosal (5 µmol/L) exposure, respectively. Tracing c was recorded after 4.1 minutes of SKF in the continued presence of thimerosal.

Fig 13ADown demonstrates that SK&F 96365 also inhibited the Ca2+-sensitive INSC activated after treatment with caffeine (10 mmol/L) and release of intracellular Ca2+ stores. The recording conditions were unchanged from previous experiments, except that the cells were dialyzed with 0.1 EGTA to permit changes in [Ca2+]i. Caffeine with 0.1 mmol/L pipette EGTA caused an increase in membrane current (with an average delay of 0.8±0.3 minutes [n=10]) due to activation of a difference current with an Er of +2 mV in the myocyte shown. The average value for Er during caffeine was not statistically different from that following O-R, diamide, or thimerosal treatment (Table 3Up). Outward rectification was observed in 4 of 10 myocytes when the current was partially activated (Fig 13ADown and 13BDown), but marked voltage dependence, as displayed in Fig 11Up, was not seen during caffeine treatment.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 13. SK&F 96365 (SKF, 100 µmol/L) inhibits the nonselective cation current (INSC) activated by caffeine (10 mmol/L). A, Quasi–steady state membrane current recordings evoked by a ramp protocol (-112 and +48 mV over 8 s from a holding potential of -67 mV) in a myocyte dialyzed with 0.1 mmol/L EGTA (L-type Ca2+, Na+, Na+-Ca2+ exchanger, and all K+ currents were suppressed with nicardipine, tetrodotoxin, Ba2+, tetraethylammonium chloride, and Mg2+, Li+, and Cs+ replacement for Ca2+, Na+, and K+; see text for additional details). Tracing a was obtained before and tracings b and c were obtained after 0.5 and 2.0 minutes of exposure to caffeine (10 mmol/L), respectively. Tracing d shows the inhibition of INSC activated by caffeine recorded after 2.0 minutes of SKF in caffeine-containing solution. Note the outward rectification in tracing b when caffeine-sensitive current was partially activated and the ohmic current-voltage relation for the fully activated current in tracing c. B, Difference currents in caffeine obtained by digital subtraction of tracing a from either tracing b (b-a) or tracing c (c-a) in panel A. The reversal potential of the difference current in this myocyte was +2.8 mV. Note the outward rectification of tracing b-a. C, Tracing a was obtained from a separate myocyte under control recording conditions identical to those in panel A. Tracings b and c were recorded after 3.0 and 16.5 minutes of exposure to caffeine (10 mmol/L), respectively. Note the limited decline in caffeine-sensitive current over a considerably longer time than that required for the marked inhibition by SKF shown in panel A.

The effect of SK&F 96365 (100 µmol/L) on the caffeine-induced conductance was determined by applying the drug after a stable maximal increase in current due to caffeine was observed. In the continued presence of caffeine, SK&F 96365 caused a marked decrease in current in the representative data shown in Fig 13Up. Similar results were obtained in an additional three myocytes. On average, the current at +48 mV declined by 92.4±2.5% by 3 to 4 minutes (n=4) of treatment with SK&F 96365. Fig 13CUp shows that in the absence of SK&F 96365, the caffeine-sensitive current declined only slightly over 16.5 minutes. Similar results were obtained in two other myocytes. On average, the current at +48 mV declined from its peak value by 10.5±1.9% (n=3) by 10 minutes, which was significantly less than that caused by SK&F 96365 (P<.05, by unpaired Student's t test). This slight decline may reflect a slow decrease in [Ca2+]i due to Ca2+ extrusion in the face of a net release of Ca2+ from the stores, the absence of Na+-Ca2+ exchange with Li+ in the bath, and perhaps altered Ca2+ sequestration due to the nonphysiological ionic constituents (Cs+ and Li+) of the recording solutions. That the change in current due to caffeine depended on increased [Ca2+]i was tested by dialyzing myocytes with 5 mmol/L BAPTA. In three myocytes, caffeine had no effect on INSC when applied in the presence of 5 mmol/L internal BAPTA (data not shown).

In a final series of experiments, the question of whether the current affected by O-R was the same or a different conductance from the Ca2+-sensitive INSC activated during caffeine treatment was tested. The O-R–generating system was applied in the presence of caffeine after the Ca2+-sensitive INSC activated by caffeine treatment had reached a stable peak. Fig 14Down shows that once INSC was activated by caffeine (10 mmol/L), subsequent exposure to O-Rs did not further enhance the membrane current. Similar data were obtained from two other myocytes. Interestingly, we did not observe any decline in the current over >15 minutes in the presence of O-Rs and caffeine. This finding was different from the {approx}10% decline observed with caffeine alone. After 15 minutes, the outward current at +48 mV had only declined by 0.5±1.6% (n=3) of its peak value in response to caffeine alone. It is possible that O-Rs affected the channels so that they remained open despite a decline in [Ca2+]i. Alternatively, we cannot rule out the possibility that O-Rs depressed Ca2+ extrusion or sequestration, so that no change in [Ca2+]i and INSC occurred with time.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 14. Effect of oxygen-derived free radical (O-R) stress after activation of the nonselective cation current (INSC) by caffeine (10 mmol/L). A, Quasi–steady state membrane current recordings evoked by a ramp protocol (-112 and +48 mV over 8 s from a holding potential of -67 mV) in a myocyte dialyzed with 0.1 mmol/L EGTA (L-type Ca2+, Na+, Na+-Ca2+ exchanger, and all K+ currents were suppressed with nicardipine, tetrodotoxin, Ba2+, tetraethylammonium chloride, and Mg2+, Li+, and Cs+ replacement for Ca2+, Na+, and K+; see text for additional details). Tracing a was obtained before and tracing b was obtained after 3.5 minutes of exposure to caffeine (10 mmol/L). Tracing c was recorded after 15.0 minutes of O-R stress in the continued presence of caffeine. Note the absence of any appreciable change in the quasi–steady state current after O-R stress in the presence of caffeine.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The present study reports the novel findings that (1) oxidative stress due to O-Rs generated in the bath solution activated a nonselective cation current in isolated guinea pig ventricular myocytes by modifying sulfhydryl groups, independent of changes in [Ca2+]i, and (2) the cardiac nonselective cation current activated by O-Rs, sulfhydryl group oxidizing agents, or caffeine is inhibited by SK&F 96365, a blocker of receptor-operated channels and Ca2+-activated INSC in other cell types.47 48 The data indicate that extracellular O-R stress may oxidize extracellular sulfhydryl groups, leading to an increase in Ca2+-activated INSC in the absence of a change in [Ca2+]i. We previously reported that a Ca2+-dependent mechanism was involved in the activation of Ca2+-sensitive INSC during intracellular O-R stress in similar myocytes under identical recording conditions.20 Therefore, the present data also provide the first indication that the mechanism by which an ionic conductance in mammalian cardiac myocytes is affected by O-R stress may vary depending on the compartment in which the radical species are present.

Membrane potential of guinea pig ventricular myocytes exposed to O-Rs generated in the bath solution showed sustained depolarization to between -40 and -10 mV. This depolarization was accompanied by the activation of a quasi–steady state difference current with an Er ({approx}-18 mV) different from the equilibrium potential of any single ion under the recording conditions used. Similar changes in membrane conductance, attributed to Ca2+-activated INSC, were previously observed after elevations in [Ca2+]i due to (1) intracellular O-R stress,20 (2) intracellular Ca2+ injection via a microelectrode,37 or (3) dialysis with a patch pipette solution containing micromolar Ca2+.38 Er values for the difference currents in these previous studies were -19.9±0.7,20 -22±11,37 and -14±0.6 mV,38 respectively. To monitor changes in INSC in the present study, we used the following recording conditions: (1) Na+, Ca2+, and K+ conductances were suppressed with TTX, nicardipine, BaCl2, and K+ replacement with Cs+. (2) The Na+-Ca2+ exchanger was inhibited by buffering [Ca2+]i to a low level with 5 mmol/L BAPTA in the pipette solution, and Na+ and Ca2+ in the bath solution were replaced with Li+ and Mg2+.49 50 51 Membrane conductance under these conditions was very low, and zero current occurred at {approx}-35 mV. The ionic basis of the residual conductance is unknown, but it may arise from a combination of seal leak, INSC, and Cl- current and/or K+ current not completely suppressed by Cs+ and Ba2+ in the pipette and bath, respectively. Within 5.9±1.5 minutes of exposure to extracellular O-R stress, membrane conductance increased substantially, and zero current occurred at {approx}-3 mV (Tables 2Up and 3Up). This latency was not different from the 4.8±0.9 minutes required for the sustained depolarization in current-clamp recordings, indicating that the alteration in membrane conductance observed with Cs+-Li+ recording conditions contributes to the change in membrane potential.

Sustained depolarization during extracellular O-R stress cannot be explained by (1) activation of a Cl- conductance, (2) a rise in a nonspecific membrane leak, or (3) a change in seal resistance. We did not observe any change in membrane conductance during O-R or diamide treatment when Na+ and K+ in the bath and pipette were replaced with TEA but Cl- concentration was unchanged. Similarly, no change in membrane current occurred with time in untreated myocytes, nor did O-R stress change the seal resistance of cell-attached patches. Furthermore, the effects of O-Rs, diamide, and thimerosal were inhibited by DTT or SK&F 96365; neither would be expected to alter seal resistance or depress a nonspecific membrane leak.

We do not attribute the change in conductance to altered ionic selectivity of another conductance, eg, a K+ current, or of a nonselective cation conductance. Alterations in the major K+ currents in cardiac myocytes carried by inward rectifier, delayed rectifier, and ATP-sensitive K+ channels occur during O-R stress, but the data do not suggest that these conductances are converted into nonselective cation channels; increased or depressed conductance was observed in the absence of simultaneous changes in INSC.8

Tarr et al52 recently concluded that a rise in leak current in frog atrial myocytes due to O-Rs from photoilluminated rose bengal resulted from a change in selective permeability of nonselective cation channels or from alterations in multiple channels. With Na+ and K+ in the bath and pipette solutions, Er for leak current showed an initial negative shift toward the K+ reversal potential, followed by a positive shift to {approx}0 mV. To account for the negative shift in Er, the authors postulated that either (1) INSC was initially more permeable to K+ over Na+, and O-R caused a biphasic change in selectivity, with K+ permeation rising first and then Na+ permeation, or (2) a separate K+ conductance was initially enhanced, followed by an increase in INSC. We never observed a negative shift in Er during O-R stress with Na+ and K+ or Cs+ and Li+ in the bath and pipette solutions. This implies that the early enhanced K+ permeation noted by Tarr et al does not occur in guinea pig ventricular myocytes exposed to O-Rs from dihydroxyfumaric acid and FeCl3/ADP.

We attribute the increase in membrane conductance and positive shift in Er during extracellular O-R stress to the activation of Ca2+-sensitive INSC on the basis of the following observations. First, during O-R stress with Cs+ and Li+ in the bath and pipette solutions, Er for quasi–steady state whole-cell current showed a positive shift from {approx}-38 to -3 mV. The Er of the O-R–sensitive difference current was {approx}+3 mV, a value close to that expected (-3.7 mV) for a nonselective cation conductance under our recording conditions based on the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation53 and assuming equal permeation of Li+ and Cs+ in the channel and no accumulation of the permeant ions on either side of the membrane. The slight difference between the two values may result from a combination of slight differences in (1) permeation of Li+ and Cs+ and/or (2) the expected and actual concentrations of ions along the inner and outer surfaces of the membrane. The disparity between the Er for the difference current in net whole-cell recording conditions (-18 mV) and in the presence of blockers to isolate INSC (+3 mV) may reflect the contribution of changes in additional conductances in the net current recordings.

Second, the change in conductance during extracellular O-R stress or sulfhydryl group oxidizing agent treatment was sensitive to SK&F 96365.47 48 This compound was originally reported to inhibit receptor-operated and L-type Ca2+ channels47 but has since been shown to affect Ca2+-activated nonselective cation channels, eg, channels activated by elevations in [Ca2+]i due to thapsigargin and cyclopiazonic acid.48 Effects on L-type Ca2+ channels were not a concern in the present experiments, since this conductance was suppressed with nicardipine and substitution of Ca2+ with Mg2+. Third, preliminary observations indicate that INSC activated by extracellular O-R stress is suppressed by external Ni2+ and Gd3+ (5 and 0.1 mmol/L, respectively; R. Jabr, E.A. Aiello, and W.C. Cole, unpublished observations, 1994), well-known ionic inhibitors of nonselective cation channels. Finally, caffeine treatment to elicit SR Ca2+ store release54 was shown to cause an identical increase in membrane conductance due to Ca2+-activated INSC under conditions similar to those in the oxidant experiments but only when intracellular Ca2+ chelation was low (0.1 mmol/L EGTA versus 5 mmol/L BAPTA). INSC activated by caffeine had a similar Er and sensitivity to SK&F 96365 compared with the conductance activated by O-R stress. Importantly, extracellular O-R stress was without an additive effect on membrane conductance when the Ca2+-sensitive INSC was already activated by caffeine. Taken together, these data suggest that the conductance affected by O-Rs and the sulfhydryl group oxidizing agents was the Ca2+-activated INSC.

INSC activated by O-R stress, diamide, thimerosal, or caffeine exhibited variability in voltage dependence, including outward rectification and relaxation of current on stepping back to a negative holding potential after a ramp protocol. The variations in difference current recordings obtained from net current data (Figs 1 through 3UpUpUp) may reflect slight variations in other conductances in some myocytes during extracellular O-R stress. However, this cannot explain the rectification observed under recording conditions modified to monitor INSC (Figs 4 through 6UpUpUp and 9 through 14). It is unlikely that the voltage dependence was related to oxidative modification, since several myocytes exhibited rectification at early times after treatment with caffeine. Interestingly, INSC activated by intracellular Ca2+ injections in guinea pig myocytes displayed less rectification than the current present at resting [Ca2+]i, as revealed by EGTA injections.37 It is possible that the voltage dependence of Ca2+-activated INSC may be a property that is manifest only when the channels are activated at lower [Ca2+]i, as would be expected in our experiments with 5 mmol/L BAPTA in the pipette solution and no extracellular Ca2+. Interestingly, Hill et al55 described a Ca2+-activated nonselective channel in reconstituted canine ventricular sarcolemmal vesicle that showed voltage dependence at low (<100 nmol/L) Ca2+. Further experiments are required to resolve this issue.

The present study implies that the mechanism responsible for increased INSC and sustained depolarization during extracellular O-R stress is different from that which we previously reported for intracellular O-R stress.20 Direct comparison of the present data with our previous experiments involving intracellular O-R stress was possible because the same generating system, recording conditions, and myocytes were used, but the generating system was included in the bath rather than the pipette solution.20 Myocytes dialyzed with O-Rs showed three stages of change in electrical activity, including (1) slight depolarization due to a decline in inward rectifier K+ current, (2) increased action potential duration, depression of plateau amplitude, and a transient period of sustained depolarization, and (3) decline in action potential duration and hyperpolarization due to ATP-sensitive K+ current.20 We attributed the sustained depolarization of stage 2 to a transient increase in Ca2+-activated INSC because the shift in membrane potential was associated with a current that (1) had an Er that was not consistent with the equilibrium potential of any single ion and varied with changes in K+ and Na+ concentrations in the bath, (2) did not discriminate between K+, Na+, Cs+, or Li+, and (3) was prevented by pretreatment with ryanodine or dialysis with 5 mmol/L EGTA in the pipette solution.20 The latter observations suggested that mishandling of Ca2+ by the SR and transient elevation in [Ca2+]i was responsible for the change in INSC during intracellular O-R stress.20 However, as shown in the present study, the sustained depolarization and increase in INSC during extracellular O-R stress did not reverse with time, and alterations in [Ca2+]i did not appear to be involved. That a change in [Ca2+]i may not be required is controversial on the basis of previous studies; photoillumination of extracellular rose bengal was without effect on INSC in rabbit ventricular myocytes in the presence of 5 mmol/L pipette EGTA,12 but Tarr et al52 still observed increased leak current in frog atrial myocytes with an identical generating system in the absence of extracellular Ca2+.

We are confident that increased INSC during extracellular O-R stress does not require changes in [Ca2+]i on the basis of the following: We went to considerable lengths to eliminate [Ca2+]i as a factor by strongly chelating intracellular Ca2+, suppressing Ca2+ influx, replacing bath Ca2+, and/or depleting internal Ca2+ stores before exposure to O-Rs. The absence of low-amplitude oscillations in membrane potential, triggered activity, or delayed afterdepolarizations due to Iti during extracellular O-R stress after pretreatment with ryanodine or after dialysis with 5 mmol/L EGTA or BAPTA is consistent with adequate control of [Ca2+]i. Itis are thought to result from increased [Ca2+]i due to abnormal SR Ca2+ release and stimulation of forward mode Na+-Ca2+ exchange56 but may also involve Ca2+-activated INSC.55 57

Our data provide evidence that oxidative modification of extracellular sulfhydryl groups on the nonselective cation channel, or an associated regulatory protein, may be involved in the response to extracellular O-R stress. The activation of INSC by extracellular O-Rs was inhibited by the sulfhydryl group reducing agent DTT. Moreover, a DTT-sensitive increase in INSC was also induced by non–O-R–oxidizing agents. These data suggest that the changes in INSC during extracellular O-R stress are the result of oxidative modification of sulfhydryl group–containing amino acids and argue against a role for localized changes in the phospholipid milieu due to lipid peroxidation. A similar inhibition by DTT was previously reported for the effects of O-Rs and other oxidants on cardiac ion transporters, such as the sarcolemmal Ca2+-ATPase26 and Na+,K+-ATPase,27 the SR Ca2+-ATPase,28 29 and ATP-sensitive K+ channels in pancreatic cells.45 Whether the sulfhydryl groups are on the nonselective channel or on an associated regulatory protein is unresolved. However, the data suggest that the thiol groups affected by O-Rs are within the extracellular compartment; thimerosal, a hydrophilic and membrane-impermeant oxidizing agent,45 46 caused an increase in INSC similar to that produced by extracellular O-Rs. Thimerosal was previously shown to inhibit ATP-sensitive K+ channels in excised patches from pancreatic cells,45 but only when it was applied on the intracellular face and not when it was in the pipette solution, implying a modification of sulfhydryl groups in the cytoplasmic compartment.

In summary, the present study is the first to report the sensitivity of a cardiac sarcolemmal ion channel to direct oxidative stress and to indicate a differential mechanism of modulation of a membrane current depending on the compartment in which the O-Rs are generated. Our data agree with previous studies in which sulfhydryl group modifying agents were found to block abnormal electrical activity that was believed to arise as a result of an altered redox state due to O-Rs in reperfusion.58 59 N-Acetylcysteine reduced the incidence of arrhythmias caused by reperfusion in Langendorff-perfused rat hearts59 and canine hearts in vivo after coronary artery ligation.58 Further studies are required to assess (1) the role of direct oxidative modification of other membrane channels in abnormal electrical activity in hearts in response to elevated O-Rs or depressed endogenous scavenger levels, (2) the significance of oxidative modification of INSC to early reperfusion arrhythmias, and (3) the properties of the single nonselective cation channels affected by O-R stress.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by Medical Research Council of Canada grant MT-10569. Dr Jabr received a traineeship from the Canadian Heart Foundation and Dr Cole was a Medical Research Council of Canada Scholar. The authors express their thanks to Yi-Jing Chen and Rodel Padua for their excellent technical assistance in the isolation of cardiac myocytes.


*    Footnotes
 
Reprint requests to Dr W.C. Cole, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr, NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1.

Previously published as preliminary observations in abstract form (Biophys J. 1994;66:A434).

Received August 17, 1994; accepted January 18, 1995.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Hess ML, Manson NH. Molecular oxygen: friend and foe: the role of the oxygen free radical system in the calcium paradox, the oxygen paradox and ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1984;16:969-985. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Zweier JL, Flaherty JT, Weisfeldt ML. Direct measurement of free radical generation following reperfusion of ischemic myocardium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84:1404-1407. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Manning AS, Hearse DJ. Reperfusion-induced arrhythmias: mechanisms and prevention. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1984;16:497-518. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Woodward B, Zakaria MNM. Effects of some free radical scavengers on reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in the isolated rat heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1985;17:485-499. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Manning AS, Coltart DJ, Hearse DJ. Ischemia and reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in the rat: effects of xanthine oxidase inhibition with allopurinol. Circ Res. 1984;55:545-548. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Hearse DJ, Tosaki A. Free radicals and reperfusion-induced arrhythmias: protection by spin trap agent PBN in the rat heart. Circ Res. 1987;60:375-383. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Bolli R, Jeroudi MO, Patel BS, Aruoma OI, Halliwell B, Lai EK, McCay PB. Marked reduction of free radical generation and contractile dysfunction by antioxidant therapy begun at the time of reperfusion: evidence that myocardial `stunning' is a manifestation of reperfusion injury. Circ Res. 1989;65:607-622. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Barrington PL. Effects of free radicals on the electrophysiological function of cardiac membranes. Free Radic Biol Med. 1990;9:355-365. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Matsuura H, Shattock MJ. Membrane potential fluctuations and transient inward currents induced by reactive oxygen intermediates in isolated rabbit ventricular cells. Circ Res. 1991;68:319-329. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Beresewisz A, Horackova M. Alterations in electrical and contractile behavior of isolated cardiomyocytes by hydrogen peroxide: possible ionic mechanisms. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1991;23:899-918. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Cerbai E, Ambrosio G, Porciatti F, Chiariello M, Giotti A, Mugelli A. Cellular electrophysiological basis for oxygen radical-induced arrhythmias. Circulation. 1991;84:1773-1782. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Matsuura H, Shattock MJ. Effects of oxidant stress on steady state background currents in isolated rabbit ventricular myocytes. Am J Physiol. 1991;67:535-549.

13. Nakaya H, Takeda Y, Tohse N, Kanno M. Mechanism of the membrane depolarization induced by oxidative stress in guinea pig ventricular cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1992;24:523-534. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Coetzee WA, Opie LH. Effects of oxygen free radicals on isolated cardiac myocytes from guinea-pig ventricle: electrophysiological studies. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1992;24:651-663. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Fliss H, Masika M, Eley DW, Korecky B. Oxygen radical mediated protein oxidation in heart. In: Singal PK, ed. Oxygen Radicals in the Pathophysiology of Heart Disease. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Kluwer Press; 1988:71-90.

16. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM. The importance of free radicals and catalytic metal ions in human diseases. Mol Aspects Med. 1985;8:119-133.

17. Burton KP, Morris AC, Massey KD, Buja LM, Hagler HK. Free radicals alter ionic calcium levels and membrane phospholipids in cultured rat ventricular myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1990;22: 1035-1047.

18. Daly MJ, Young RJ, Britnell SL, Nayler WG. The role of calcium in the toxic effects of tert-butyl hydroperoxide on adult rat cardiac myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1991;23:1303-1320. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Persoon-Rothert M, Egas-Kenniphaas JM, van der Valk-Kokshoorn EJ, van der Laarse A. Cumene hydroperoxide induced changes in calcium homeostasis in cultured neonatal rat heart cells. Cardiovasc Res. 1992;26:706-712. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Jabr RI, Cole WC. Alterations in electrical activity and membrane currents induced by intracellular oxygen-derived free radical stress in guinea pig ventricular myocytes. Circ Res. 1993;72:1229-1244. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Nakaya H, Tohse N, Kanno M. Electrophysiological derangements induced by lipid peroxidation in cardiac tissue. Am J Physiol. 1987;253:H1089-H1097. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Firek L, Beresewicz A. Hydrogen peroxide induced changes in membrane potentials in guinea pig ventricular muscle: permissive role of iron. Cardiovasc Res. 1990;24:493-499. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Duan J, Moffat MP. Potential cellular mechanisms of hydrogen peroxide-induced cardiac arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1992;19:593-601. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Ferrari R, Ceconi C, Curello S, Cargnoni A, Alfieri O, Pardini A, Marzollo P, Visiolo O. Oxygen free radicals and myocardial damage: protective role of thiol-containing agents. Am J Med. 1991;91:95S-105S. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Eley DW, Korecky B, Fliss H. Dithiothreitol restores contractile function to oxidant-injured cardiac muscle. Am J Physiol. 1989;257:H1321-H1325. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Kaneko M, Hayashi H, Kobayashi A, Yamazaki N, Dhalla NS. Inhibition of heart sarcolemmal Ca2+-pump activity by oxygen free radicals. Bratisl Lek Listy. 1991;92:48-56. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Matsouka T, Kato M, Kako KJ. Effect of oxidant on Na, K, ATPase and its reversal. Basic Res Cardiol. 1990;85:330-341. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Yanagishita T, Matsouka T, Kako KJ. Pharmacological intervention in oxidant-induced calcium pump dysfunction of dog heart. Biochem Int. 1989;18:1111-1119. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Eley DW, Eley JM, Korecky B, Fliss H. Impairment of cardiac contractility and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase activity by hypochlorous acid: reversal by dithiothreitol. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1991;69:1677-1683. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Kukreja RC, Hess ML. The oxygen free radical system: from equations through membrane-protein interactions to cardiovascular injury and protection. Cardiovasc Res. 1992;26:641-655. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. Role of free radicals and catalytic metal ions in human disease: an overview. In: Packer L, Glazer AN, eds. Methods in Enzymology. New York, NY: Academic Press Inc; 1990;186:127-133.

32. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. 2nd ed. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press; 1989:28-31.

33. Tarr M, Valenzeno DP. Modification of cardiac action potential by photosensitizer-generated reactive oxygen. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1989;21:539-543. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Langer GA, Frank JS, Orner FB. Calcium exchange, structure, and function in cultured adult myocardial cells. Am J Physiol. 1987;252:H314-H324. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FJ. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free patches. Pflugers Arch. 1981;391:85-100. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Barrington PL, Meier CF, Weglicki WB. Abnormal electrical activity induced by free radical generating systems in isolated cardiomyocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1988;20:1163-1178. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Matsuda H. Effects of intracellular calcium injection on steady state membrane currents in isolated single ventricular cells. Pflugers Arch. 1983;397:81-83. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Sato R, Noma A, Kurachi Y, Irisawa H. Effects of intracellular acidification on membrane currents in ventricular cells of the guinea pig. Circ Res. 1985;57:553-561. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Beuckelmann DJ, Weir WG. Mechanism of release of calcium from sarcoplasmic reticulum of guinea-pig cardiac cells. J Physiol (Lond). 1988;405:233-255. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Lederer WJ, Niggli E, Hadley RW. Sodium-calcium exchange in excitable cells: fuzzy space. Science. 1990;348:283.

41. Tsien RY. New calcium indicators and buffers with high selectivity against magnesium and protons: design, synthesis and properties of prototype structure. Biochemistry. 1980;19:2396-2404. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

42. Ziegler DM. Role of reversible oxidation-reduction of enzyme thiols-disulfides in metabolic regulation. Annu Rev Biochem. 1985;54:305-329. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

43. Kosower NS, Kosower EM, Wertheim B, Correa W. Diamide, a new reagent for the intracellular oxidation of glutathione to the disulfide. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1969;37:593-596. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Haest CWM, Kamp D, Deuticke B. Formation of disulfide bonds between glutathione and membrane SH-groups in human erythrocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979;557:363-371. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

45. Islam MS, Berggren P-O, Larsson O. Sulfhydryl oxidation induces rapid and reversible closure of the ATP-regulated K+ channel in the pancreatic ß-cell. FEBS Lett. 1993;319:128-132. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

46. Gericke M, Droogmans G, Nilius B. Thimerosal induced changes of intracellular calcium in human endothelial cells. Cell Calcium. 1993;14:201-207. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

47. Merritt JE, Armstrong WP, Benham CD, Hallam TJ, Jacob R, Jaxa-Chamiec A, Leigh BK, McCarthy SA, Moores KE, Rink TE. SK&F 96365, a novel inhibitor of receptor-mediated calcium entry. Biochem J. 1990;271:515-522. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

48. Schilling WP, Cabello OA, Rajan L. Depletion of the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate-sensitive intracellular Ca2+ store in vascular endothelial cells activates the agonist-sensitive Ca(2+)-influx pathway. Biochem J. 1992;284:521-530.

49. Kimura J, Miyamae S, Noma A. Identification of sodium-calcium exchange current in single ventricular cells of guinea-pig. J Physiol (Lond). 1987;384:199-222. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

50. Miura Y, Kimura J. Sodium calcium exchange current: dependence on internal Ca and Na and competitive binding of external Na and Ca. J Gen Physiol. 1989;93:1129-1145. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

51. Fedida D, Noble D, Rankin AC, Spindler AJ. The arrhythmogenic transient inward current ITI and related contraction in isolated guinea-pig ventricular myocytes. J Physiol (Lond). 1987;392:523-542. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

52. Tarr M, Arriaga E, Goetrz KK, Valenzeno DP. Properties of cardiac ILEAK induced by photosensitizer-generated reactive oxygen. Free Radic Biol Med. 1994;16:477-484. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

53. Goldman AL, Katz B. The effect of sodium ions on the electrical activity of the giant axon of the squid. J Physiol (Lond). 1949;108:37-77.

54. Rousseau E, Meissner G. Single cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-release channel: activation by caffeine. Am J Physiol. 1989;256:H328-H333. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

55. Hill JA, Coronado R, Strauss HC. Reconstitution and characterization of a calcium-activated channel from heart. Circ Res. 1988;62:411-415. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

56. Berlin JR, Cannell MB, Lederer WJ. Cellular origins of the transient inward current in cardiac myocytes: role of fluctuations and waves of elevated intracellular calcium. Circ Res. 1989;65:115-126. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

57. Ehara T, Noma A, Ono K. Calcium-activated non-selective cation channel in ventricular cells isolated from adult guinea-pig hearts. J Physiol (Lond). 1988;403:117-133. [Abstract/Free Full Text]

58. Sochman J, Kolc J, Fabian J. Cardioprotective effects of N-acetylcysteine: the reduction in the extent of infarction and occurrence of reperfusion arrhythmias in the dog. Int J Cardiol. 1990;28:191-196. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

59. Qiu Y, Bernier M, Hearse DJ. The influence of N-acetylcysteine on cardiac function and rhythm disorders during ischemia and reperfusion. Cardioscience. 1990;1:65-74.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
H. E. D. J. ter Keurs and P. A. Boyden
Calcium and Arrhythmogenesis
Physiol Rev, April 1, 2007; 87(2): 457 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Nojiri, T. Shimizu, M. Funakoshi, O. Yamaguchi, H. Zhou, S. Kawakami, Y. Ohta, M. Sami, T. Tachibana, H. Ishikawa, et al.
Oxidative Stress Causes Heart Failure with Impaired Mitochondrial Respiration
J. Biol. Chem., November 3, 2006; 281(44): 33789 - 33801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
K. Zorn-Pauly, P. Schaffer, B. Pelzmann, E. Bernhart, G. Wei, P. Lang, G. Ledinski, J. Greilberger, B. Koidl, and G. Jurgens
Oxidized LDL induces ventricular myocyte damage and abnormal electrical activity-role of lipid hydroperoxides
Cardiovasc Res, April 1, 2005; 66(1): 74 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
D. M. Browe and C. M. Baumgarten
Angiotensin II (AT1) Receptors and NADPH Oxidase Regulate Cl- Current Elicited by {beta}1 Integrin Stretch in Rabbit Ventricular Myocytes
J. Gen. Physiol., August 30, 2004; 124(3): 273 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
R. Guinamard, A. Chatelier, M. Demion, D. Potreau, S. Patri, M. Rahmati, and P. Bois
Functional characterization of a Ca2+-activated non-selective cation channel in human atrial cardiomyocytes
J. Physiol., July 1, 2004; 558(1): 75 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
S. A. Gupte, M. Arshad, S. Viola, P. M. Kaminski, Z. Ungvari, G. Rabbani, A. Koller, and M. S. Wolin
Pentose phosphate pathway coordinates multiple redox-controlled relaxing mechanisms in bovine coronary arteries
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): H2316 - H2326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
A. E Pollard, W. E Cascio, V. G Fast, and S. B Knisley
Modulation of triggered activity by uncoupling in the ischemic border: A model study with phase 1b-like conditions
Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2002; 56(3): 381 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J. Sochman
N-acetylcysteine in acute cardiology: 10 years later: What do we know and what would we like to know?!
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2002; 39(9): 1422 - 1428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
Y. Wu and M. E Anderson
Ca2+-activated non-selective cation current in rabbit ventricular myocytes
J. Physiol., January 1, 2000; 522(1): 51 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
E. Carmeliet
Cardiac Ionic Currents and Acute Ischemia: From Channels to Arrhythmias
Physiol Rev, July 1, 1999; 79(3): 917 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
R. Zucchi, G. Yu, P. Galbani, M. Mariani, G. Ronca, and S. Ronca-Testoni
Sulfhydryl Redox State Affects Susceptibility to Ischemia and Sarcoplasmic Reticulum Ca2+ Release in Rat Heart : Implications for Ischemic Preconditioning
Circ. Res., November 2, 1998; 83(9): 908 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M. Janiszewski, C. A Pasqualucci, L. C Souza, F. Pileggi, P. L da Luz, and F. R M. Laurindo
Oxidized thiols markedly amplify the vascular response to balloon injury in rabbits through a redox active metal-dependent pathway
Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 1998; 39(2): 327 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
J. I. Kourie
Interaction of reactive oxygen species with ion transport mechanisms
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, July 1, 1998; 275(1): C1 - C24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
Z.-W. Wang, M. Nara, Y.-X. Wang, and M. I. Kotlikoff
Redox Regulation of Large Conductance Ca2+-activated K+ Channels in Smooth Muscle Cells
J. Gen. Physiol., July 1, 1997; 110(1): 35 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
Z. Li, H. Z. Mao, F. M. Abboud, and M. W. Chapleau
Oxygen-Derived Free Radicals Contribute to Baroreceptor Dysfunction in Atherosclerotic Rabbits
Circ. Res., October 1, 1996; 79(4): 802 - 811.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
W. E. Cascio, H. Yang, T. A. Johnson, B. J. Muller-Borer, and J. J. Lemasters
Electrical Properties and Conduction in Reperfused Papillary Muscle
Circ. Res., October 26, 2001; 89(9): 807 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jabr, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Cole, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jabr, R. I.
Right arrow Articles by Cole, W. C.