Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2009;104:245-254
Published online before print December 4, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.182410
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/2/245    most recent
CIRCRESAHA.108.182410v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toutain, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lenfant, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Toutain, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lenfant, F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ESTRADIOL
*TAMOXIFEN
Related Collections
Right arrow Angiogenesis
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow Other Vascular biology
Right arrowRelated Article
(Circulation Research. 2009;104:245.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Integrative Physiology

Prevention of Skin Flap Necrosis by Estradiol Involves Reperfusion of a Protected Vascular Network

Céline E. Toutain, Laurent Brouchet*, Isabelle Raymond-Letron*, Patricia Vicendo, Hortense Bergès, Julie Favre, Marie-José Fouque, Andrée Krust, Anne-Marie Schmitt, Pierre Chambon, Pierre Gourdy, Jean-François Arnal, Françoise Lenfant

From Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U858, Toulouse (C.E.T., L.B., H.B., J.F., M.J.F., P.G., J.F.A., F.L.); Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Institut de Médecine Moléculaire de Rangueil, IFR31, Toulouse (C.T., H.B., J.B., M.J.F., P.G., J.F.A., F.L.); Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Explorations Fonctionnelles Physiologiques, Toulouse (J.F.A.); Département d’Anatomie Pathologique, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, Toulouse (I.R.L.); Université Mixte 5623 au centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier (P.V.); Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Université Louis Pasteur, Collège de France, Illkirch (A.K., P.C.); Pierre Fabre Dermocosmétique, Centre de Recherche sur la Peau et les Epitheliums de Revêtement (A.M.S.); France.

Correspondence to Françoise Lenfant, INSERM U858, CHU Rangueil, BP 84225, 31 432 Toulouse Cedex 4, France. E-mail Francoise.Lenfant{at}inserm.fr


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Although 17β-estradiol (E2) is protective in experimental models of myocardial and brain ischemia, its effect on skin ischemia remains unknown. Here, we assessed the protective effect of E2 in a mouse model of skin ischemia, mimicking the surgery of skin flaps. Whereas necrosis appeared in the half portion of the skin flap within 1 week after surgery in ovariectomized mice, it was reduced up to 10-fold when mice were pretreated with E2, at least 3 days before the surgery. The beneficial effect of E2 appeared to be attributable to an increase in skin survival, revealed by measuring viability of ex vivo explants and enhancement of the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 protein expression in vivo. This protective effect on the skin contributed to the protection of the vascular network and facilitated reperfusion, which was found to be accelerated in ovariectomized E2-treated mice, whereas hemorrhages were observed in untreated mice. E2 also increased expression of fibroblast growth factor-2 isoforms in the skin and circulating vascular endothelial growth factor in the serum. Finally, this protective effect of E2 was abolished in estrogen receptor–deficient mice (ER{alpha}–/–) but maintained in chimeric mice reconstituted with ER{alpha}-deficient bone marrow, indicating dispensable action of E2 in bone marrow–derived cells. This protective effect of E2 was mimicked by treatment with tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator. In conclusion, we have demonstrated for the first time that E2 exerts a major preventive effect of skin flap necrosis through a prevention of ischemic-induced skin lesions, including those of the vascular network, which contributes to accelerate the reperfusion of the skin flap.


Key Words: estradiol • skin flap model • ischemia


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Skin flaps are frequently used in plastic and reconstructive surgery. However, necrosis represents a major complication that may require secondary surgical interventions, generate multiple infections, and delay future treatments. Necrosis is caused by severe ischemia, resulting from impaired arterial inflow, especially in the distal part of the flap. Therapeutic angiogenesis by local administration of angiogenic growth factors fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-21 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF),2 and a combination of these growth factors,3 have been successfully tested to enhance blood perfusion in affected tissues, decreasing the extent of flap necrosis. However, the safety of this approach remains controversial,4 and no efficient therapy is currently available.

Estrogens appear to be attractive candidates, because 17β-estradiol (E2) exerts protective effects in various animal models of cardiac, brain, and hindlimb ischemia5–7 by favoring angiogenesis, limiting endothelial dysfunction, and exerting inflammatory and antiapoptotic effects.8,9 In elderly patients, E2 supplementation accelerates cutaneous wound healing.10 The mechanisms underlying these changes involve an increase in transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 secretion11 but also inhibition of the local inflammatory response by downregulating migration inhibitory factor, which contributes to enhance matrix deposition.12

In the present work, we used a mouse model of cutaneous ischemia to investigate whether E2 can prevent necrosis after severe blood flow impairment. Whereas necrosis appeared in the distal portion of the skin flap within 1 week after surgery in ovariectomized mice, it was largely reduced or even totally prevented in E2-treated animals. We then analyzed the E2-induced mechanisms accounting for this protection, such as skin viability and kinetics of revascularization.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animal Studies
Female C57BL/6J, FVB, hairless (SKH1) (Charles River Laboratories, Saint-Germain sur l’Arbresle, France), nude (NMRI) (Janvier, Le Genest St Isle, France) mice, and estrogen receptor {alpha} knockout (ER{alpha}KO) (described elsewhere13) mice were ovariectomized at 5 weeks of age to suppress endogenous production of estrogens and implanted or not with pellets releasing either E2 (0.1 mg or 0.25 mg; 60-day release) or tamoxifen (5 mg; 60-day release) (Innovative Research of America, Sarasota, Fla). Skin flap surgery was performed 2 weeks later (Figure 1A). All mice were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions in our animal facilities. Procedures were performed in accordance with the recommendations of the European Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care and guidelines established by the National Institute of Medical Research (INSERM).


Figure 1
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Effect of E2 treatment on prevention of skin flap necrosis in C57BL/6 or FVB mice. A, Experimental protocol: female mice were ovariectomized at 5 weeks of age and implanted or not with a pellet releasing E2 for 60 days. Flap surgery was performed 2 weeks later. B, Vascular pattern of mouse dorsal skin. The skin is supplied by 4 major pedicles arising from the deep circumflex iliac arteries (I) and the lateral thoracic arteries (T). Surgery led to ischemia and subsequent necrosis in the distal part of the skin flap. Percentages of necrosis were quantified by planimetry, measuring the area of necrosis on the day of analysis (red area) divided by the area of the skin flap on day 0 (green area). The percentages of necrosis±SEM on C57BL/6 (C) and FVB (D) mice are indicated with representative photographs on days 6 and 12. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001.

Administration of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (Sigma, Saint Quentin, France) (50 mg/kg per day in drinking water) was initiated 1 week before surgery.

Anti–TGF-β123 or an isotype matched (IgG2b) control monoclonal antibody was injected 2 days before surgery and then twice a week.14

Ischemia Model and Necrosis Quantification
A U-shaped peninsular skin incision was created on the dorsal surface of anesthetized (ketamine [100 mg kg–1] and xylazine [10 mg kg–1]) mice.15,16 The skin was elevated from the underlying muscular bed and the 2 vascular pedicles arising from the lateral thoracic arteries (T) were sectioned (Figure 1B). To quantify necrosis, mice were photographed and necrosis area was measured by planimetry with the ImageJ software (NIH) (Figure 1B).

Bone Marrow Transplantation
Recipient C57BL/6 mice were lethally irradiated (9Gy, {gamma}-source) and reconstituted with bone marrow from either ER{alpha}+/+ or ER{alpha}–/– donor 24 hours later.

Ex Vivo Viability Assays
Hairless female mice were ovariectomized and implanted or not with a pellet of E2. Two weeks later, dorsal skin samples were maintained in culture in DMEM medium (pH 7.4) supplemented with nonessential amino acids, 10% calf serum, 50 µg/mL gentamicin, and E2 (Sigma-Aldrich; concentration, 10–9 mol/L) or DMSO vehicle as control. Skin explants were incubated for 24 or 48 hours at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Viability of skin samples was determined by colorimetric 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay as previously described.17

Skin Blood Perfusion and Angiography
Skin flap blood perfusion was assessed with a Laser Doppler Perfusion Imaging system (PeriScan PIM II Imager, Perimed AB, Järfälla, Sweden). Perfused skin vessels were visualized by angiography after intracardiac injection of fluorescein isothiocyanate dextran.

Information regarding histological analysis, Western blot analysis and ELISA, transmission electron microscopy, and statistical analysis is available in the expanded Materials and Methods section in the online data supplement at http://circres.ahajournals.org.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Protective Effect of E2 on Skin Flap Necrosis
To test the protective effect of E2 on skin flap necrosis, we standardized a model16 to induce severe ischemia. In ovariectomized untreated C57BL/6 mice, severe and extended necrosis in the distal part of the flap (desquamation, alopecia, and scab formation) appeared maximal within 1 week after surgery (Figure 1C). In ovariectomized E2-treated mice, necrosis was largely reduced or even totally absent and wound healing at the incisions was accelerated. Quantitative analyses showed that necrosis in the untreated group accounted for 53.7±3.8% of the total flap area at its maximum on day 6, whereas in the E2-treated group, it represented only 3.8±2.6% (P<0.001). Similar results were obtained in FVB mice (48.1±8.2% in the untreated group versus 7.7±3.4% in E2-treated mice) (P<0.001) (Figure 1D). Mice were euthanized at the end of the protocol (day 21). Ovariectomized mice showed atrophied uteri (<20 mg), whereas E2-treated mice showed a significant increase in uterine weight (115±5 mg).

Effect of E2 Treatment on Skin Structure and Microscopic Lesions
Histological analysis was performed to qualify ischemic lesions. Ovariectomy increased both density and size of pilosebaceous units, which were the predominant proliferative structure in the absence of endogenous E2 (intense nuclear Ki-67 staining; Figure 2A). E2 decreased skin thickness and favored a mucinous layer rich in glycosaminoglycans below the platysma muscle (detected by acid Alcian blue coloration; data not shown), as well as an arrest of follicle proliferation, as reported.18


Figure 2
View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Effect of E2 on skin structure and microscopic lesions. A, The skin structure of intact female mice was assessed by H&E staining (x100 magnification) and compared to ovariectomized (OVX) mice treated or not with E2. The insets show Ki-67 immunostaining (x400 magnification). PM indicates platysma muscle. B, Extent of necrosis observed after H&E staining of skin flap longitudinal sections from ovariectomized mice, treated or not with E2 at different times postsurgery. *indicates position of the suture; bars, extent of necrosis. C, Percentages of skin flap necrosis in ovariectomized nude and hairless SKH1 mice treated or not with E2. ***P<0.001.

Necrosis was detected by microscopic examination earlier than by macroscopic examination (Figure 2B, day 2 versus day 6). In E2-treated animals, necrosis extended to one-tenth the length of the flap on the distal part, whereas it affected not only the distal but also the medial portion of the flap in ovariectomized animals. The progression of degeneration toward necrosis was prominent in hair follicle cells (see Figure I in the online data supplement). The protective effect of E2 persisted in nude and hairless mice and was similar to that observed in wild type mice, ruling out a role of E2 on hair follicle proliferation as a significant mechanism for protection (Figure 2C).

Acute inflammation (vasodilation, rolling of neutrophils) was detectable 4 hours after surgery, but massive neutrophilic infiltrate appeared only on day 4 and was more severe in ovariectomized mice. Neutrophils were concentrated where fibrous scar tissue replaced the necrotic tissue (data not shown). Even if TGF-β1 was shown to be involved in increase of wound healing by E2, we showed that administration of TGF-β–neutralizing antibody did not have any major effect on necrosis extent (supplemental Figure II, A). However, as previously reported,19 blocking TGF-β delayed wound healing in ovariectomized mice (detectable from days 12 to 21).

E2 Improves Skin Survival
Tissue viability was assessed in ex vivo skin samples by following the activity of mitochondrial dehydrogenases (MTT assay) (Figure 3A).17 Samples from ovariectomized mice showed 59.4±5.4% of MTT conversion after 24 hours of culture, whereas samples from E2-treated or intact female mice were still close to the maximum of viability (88.7±2.4% and 91.2±4.4%, respectively). After 48 hours of culture, skin viability was reduced in all groups but remained significantly higher in the E2-treated group (62.8±3.7%) and intact female skin (63.9±5.5%) compared to the untreated ovariectomized mice (31.3±4.6%). Addition of 10–9 mol/L E2 in the culture medium increased not only skin samples viability from ovariectomized mice but also skin viability from both E2-treated and intact mice.


Figure 3
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Viability of the skin. A, Evaluation of ex vivo skin viability from hairless mice in culture: MTT assay was performed on dorsal skin samples harvested from intact female and ovariectomized mice treated or not with E2 immediately after animals were euthanized and after 24 or 48 hours of culture in DMEM supplemented or not with 10–9 mol/L E2. Skin viability was expressed as a percentage of viability measured at time 0 (considered as 100%), as previously described.17 Values are means±SEM from 4 skin samples. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001. B, Evaluation of in vivo expression of pro- and antiapoptotic factors in C57BL/6 mice. Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, and procaspase-3 protein expressions in the proximal area of skin flaps before surgery and at days 2 and 4 after surgery were determined by immunoblotting on protein extracts. β-Actin was used as a loading control.

The expression of pro- and antiapoptotic molecules was detected in vivo in C57BL/6 skin flaps. As shown in Figure 3B, the expression of the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 protein was always low in ovariectomized mice as compared to E2-treated mice. It decreased slowly from day 0 to day 4 on the former, whereas a transient decrease was observed on day 2 on the latter. The procaspase-3 and Bcl-XL proteins were not affected by E2 treatment or by ischemia duration. Furthermore, the activated form of caspase-3 was not detected (data not shown).

E2 Accelerates Reperfusion of a Preserved Vascular Network
Histopathology indicated that vasodilatation occurs shortly after surgery (visible 4 hours after surgery; see supplemental Figure III, A). Because E2 is known to increase NO bioavailability, we investigated whether its protective effect against necrosis might be blunted by nitric oxide synthase inhibition. Pharmacological inhibition with NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) had no effect on necrosis prevention by E2 (see supplemental Figure III, B).

Evaluation of skin flap perfusion using color laser Doppler imaging showed that the severe ischemia induced by surgery was followed by a blood flow restoration starting from the proximal part of the flap (Figure 4A). In untreated mice, skin perfusion remained very low, even on days 6 and 8 and impaired perfusion was associated with necrosis. A quicker and more intense perfusion was observed in E2-treated mice, with an almost complete reperfusion on day 6. Quantification of blood flow then showed a significant higher reperfusion in the E2-treated group as compared to ovariectomized mice (Figure 4B).


Figure 4
View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Analysis of blood flow perfusion of the skin flap. A, Color laser Doppler analysis of the skin flap in ovariectomized FVB mice treated or not with E2 on day 0 (on preoperative and postoperative surgery) and on days 4, 6, and 8 postsurgery. The color scale illustrates variations in blood flow from maximal (red) to minimal perfusion (dark blue). B, Blood flow perfusion of the total flap area was quantified and reported in perfusion units±SEM. **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. C, Major pedicles were sectioned by the surgery (arrows). Angiography showed growth of functional collaterals from preexisting anastomoses on the top of the flap. D, Representative analysis of the vascularization of the skin on day 4 using angiography (left), color laser Doppler (middle), and visual observation of the reverse side of the skin flap (right). E, Histological analysis by H&E staining (x400 magnification) and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry (x1000 magnification) in the skin flaps of ovariectomized mice treated or not with E2. Arrows point the presence of extra vascular erythrocytes. F, Transmission electronic microscopy of vessels in the most distal part of the skin flaps in nonoperated mice (intact vessel) and in ovariectomized C57BL/6 mice treated or not with E2, on day 4. The arrows indicate erythrocytes. EC indicates endothelial cells. The scale bar represents 0.4 µm. G, Immunoblotting experiments show that expression of FGF-2 isoforms is enhanced in E2-treated C57BL/6 mice. H, Circulating VEGF concentration is enhanced on day 2 after the surgery in both groups of mice, but the increase is more important in E2-treated animals. **P<0.01.

Angiograms fitted well to laser Doppler images. On day 2, skin flap vascularization was generally absent, with no obvious difference between the 2 groups (data not shown). On day 4, examination of the vascular network indicated that remodeling of numerous arteriolar anastomoses present in the skin occurred on the top of the flap, in both groups, where pedicles were sectioned (Figure 4C). This remodeling allowed blow flow restoration, especially in E2-treated mice, in which reperfusion was almost complete. In untreated mice, perfusion was still missing in the most distal part of the flap and flap elevation showed severe hemorrhages (Figure 4D). Hemalum/eosin (H&E) staining (Figure 4E) clearly showed vessel thrombosis and erythrocyte extravasations in the dermis, especially in the middle zone of skin flaps. In contrast, a slight vascular congestion with minor hemorrhages was observed in E2-treated animals. Ki-67 immunohistochemistry indicated abundant proliferation of endothelial cells on day 4, without any significant difference between the 2 groups, even then TGF-β blocking antibody was administrated. Transmission electron microscopy confirmed the loss of vessel integrity in ovariectomized mice with presence of free erythrocytes in the tissue, whereas erythrocytes remained intravascular in E2-treated animals even if endothelial cells were damaged (Figure 4F).

Detection of cutaneous FGF-2 isoforms and plasmatic VEGF (Figure 4G and 4H) indicated higher expression of both FGF-2 isoforms (all times) and VEGF (day 2) in E2-treated mice as compared to untreated mice. Additionally, in E2-treated animals, secreted FGF-2 isoform (supplemental Figure III, C) and circulating VEGF were further increased after surgery on day 2. Therefore, prevention of skin necrosis by E2 was associated with earlier reperfusion of a better preserved vascular network.

Influence and Duration of Dose of E2 Pretreatment
We evaluated exposure to different doses of E2, using untreated intact (endogenous E2) or treated intact mice (0.1-mg pellet) and ovariectomized mice given either a 0.1- or 0.25-mg pellet (releasing 80 and 200 µg/kg per day, respectively), compared to untreated ovariectomized mice (dose, 0). There was no significant effect of the dose among the four groups impregnated with E2 (Figure 5B) (11.3±4.5% and 15.2±4.0% of necrosis in intact female mice treated or not with E2, respectively, compared to 11.9±2.6% and 9.3±2.3% in mice receiving 0.1 or 0.25 mg, respectively on day 8).


Figure 5
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Effect of timing and dose of E2 treatment on the prevention of necrosis. A, Effect of E2 dose on necrosis. Flap surgery was performed on intact and ovariectomized female C57BL/6 mice treated or not with E2. The pellet of E2 released either 0.1 mg or 0.25 mg for 60 days (80 and 200 µg kg–1 per day), respectively. B, Effect of E2 pretreatment duration on necrosis. E2 treatment was started 14 days or 3 days before the surgery or the day of the surgery (day 0). Percentages of necrosis±SEM were given on day 8. **P<0.01; ***P<0.001; ns, not significant vs OVX-E2.

To reduce exposure to E2, the minimal time required to prevent skin necrosis was also evaluated. E2 treatment initiated 3 days before flap elevation conserved the protective effect, whereas abolition was observed when treatment was initiated the same day of surgery (Figure 5A) (8.3±3.9%, and 41.1±5.6%, respectively, compared to 38.2±3.5% in ovariectomized animals).

These data indicated that a physiological estrogen exposure (ie, estrus cycle) or an exogenous E2 short treatment initiated 3 days before flap elevation were sufficient to obtain an optimal protection against necrosis.

Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Mediates the Protective Effect of E2 but Is Dispensable in Bone Marrow–Derived Cells
Estrogens exert their biological effects through 2 different nuclear estrogen receptors (ERs), namely ER{alpha}20 and ERβ,21 which are expressed in various cell types, including endothelial cells, immune cells, and skin. ER{alpha} is known to mediate most of the E2 effects in the vascular system.22

Surgery was performed in ER{alpha}–/– mice to evaluate the role of ER{alpha} in the protective effect of E2 on necrosis. Similar high rates of necrosis were obtained in ovariectomized ER{alpha}–/– mice treated or not with E2 (32.9±5.7% and 36.9±2.3%, respectively, on day 8) (Figure 6A). To assess the contribution of bone marrow–derived cells, we grafted irradiated mice with ER{alpha}+/+ or ER{alpha}–/– bone marrow. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups of chimeric mice (ER{alpha}+/+ versus ER{alpha}–/–) (Figure 6B), but E2 treatment was as effective in ER{alpha}–/– chimeric mice as in control ER{alpha}+/+ chimeric mice.


Figure 6
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Role of ER{alpha} in the prevention of skin necrosis. Percentages of necrosis were evaluated in ovariectomized ER{alpha}–/– mice (A) and C57BL/6 mice reconstituted with bone marrow from either ER{alpha}+/+ or ER{alpha}–/– donor mice (B) treated or not with E2 (0.1 mg per 60-day release). Values are means±SEM. *P<0.05, ***P<0.001 vs respective untreated mice.

These data indicated that the protective effect of E2 requires ER{alpha} expression, independently of its expression in bone marrow.

Effect of the Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator Tamoxifen
Tamoxifen antagonizes the effect of E2 in breast cancer and is frequently administrated at the same time as breast reconstructive surgery but has some agonist actions on other tissues, for instance, uterus. Tamoxifen treatment 14 days before flap surgery significantly reduced the area of necrosis to 9.3±3.0% on day 8 compared to the placebo (38.2±3.5%), this protective effect being similar to that of E2 (13.2±2.9% on day 8, P>0.05) (Figure 7A). Histological analyses at the time of surgery showed that tamoxifen involved similar structural modifications than E2 (Figure 7B).


Figure 7
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7. Effect of tamoxifen treatment on skin necrosis. A, Percentages of necrosis±SEM were quantified in ovariectomized C57BL/6 mice treated or not with tamoxifen 14 days before the surgery. ***P<0.001. B, Skin structure of ovariectomized tamoxifen-treated mice was assessed by H&E staining on the day of the surgery (x100 magnification).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Using a standardized mouse model of skin flap, we demonstrated for the first time, to our knowledge, that E2 efficiently protects against skin necrosis. We showed that ovarian cycle E2 amounts are sufficient to mediate this protective effect. Maximal protection was maintained with a 3-day pretreatment but abolished when initiated the day of surgery. Therefore, functional and/or structural changes in skin and/or vasculature seemed to be a prerequisite for the protective effect of E2. The similarity of the results obtained in different genetic backgrounds, including hairless mice, demonstrated the robustness of E2 effect. The protective effect of E2 was abolished in ER{alpha}–/– mice, indicating an additional role for ER{alpha} in skin necrosis prevention, which adds to its effects on reproduction, bone remodeling, vascular system.22

The effect of E2 against skin ischemia involves preservation of skin viability, as demonstrated in ex vivo explants. Antiapoptotic effect of E2 has been extensively studied in ischemic brain23,24 and heart.25,26 E2 inhibits apoptosis in cultured keratinocytes by promoting Bcl-2 expression.27 Our present data further indicated that E2 directly promotes skin survival, enhancing the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 expression in vivo. E2 treatment induces skin structural modifications, increasing the mucinous layer that might play a major function to improve skin survival. This mucinous layer plays an important role in tissue structural integrity and increased skin water content.28 Indeed, these modifications are important to stimulate connective tissue synthesis in normal and photodamaged skin29 and are involved in the wound-healing process.30,31

Moreover, the present study indicates that the protective effect of E2 against necrosis is associated with an accelerated reperfusion of the flap, following collateral remodeling. Doppler analysis and angiography showed that E2 improved blood perfusion, from day 4 to 8 after ischemia. In ovariectomized animals, major hemorrhages were found within the tissue and extravascular erythrocytes were most abundant in the middle zone of skin flaps, where reperfusion occurred. Transmission electron microscopy revealed vascular leakage, with obvious endothelial disjunctions responsible for erythrocyte extravasations. In E2-treated animals, erythrocytes remained intravascular, even if some endothelial cells displayed ultrastructural damages, suggesting that the increase in skin survival induced by E2 also benefits on vascular network preservation. This original result is in line with its antiapoptotic effect reported previously in vitro on different cultured endothelial cells9,32,33 but also on the decrease of vessel permeability observed in the brain following estrogen treatment in rats.34

E2 is known to directly modulate endothelial migration, proliferation,8 and vascularization through induction of several growth factors, such as VEGF35 or FGF-2.36 Here, we found that both VEGF and FGF-2 levels were higher in E2-treated mice. These results strongly suggest that E2 probably contributes to accelerate vascular remodeling: arteriogenesis and angiogenesis. Collateral remodeling is known to be rapid in C57BL/6 mice, with functional collaterals already present 3 days after hindlimb ischemia.37 Because this remodeling occurred rapidly and because skin is rich in anastomoses, small differences in the timing of collateral remodeling between treated and untreated C57BL/6 mice were difficult to evaluate in our model. Because arteriogenesis was shown to be reduced in BALB/c mice and delayed to days 7 to 14 after femoral occlusion,37 skin flap necrosis was investigated in BALB/c mice (see supplemental Figure IV). The protective effect of E2 was found to be largely decreased on this genetic background but remained significant compared to ovariectomized mice. Indeed, high rates of necrosis (more than 30%) were measured in E2-treated BALB/c mice, which developed the most extensive necrosis among all mice of strains tested. These are associated with no significant difference in blood perfusion following surgery between the 2 groups, suggesting that delayed arteriogenesis in BALB/c could have impaired the protective action of E2 in treated mice.

Recruitment of bone marrow cells has been demonstrated to be involved in neovascularization of ischemic tissues.38,39 Otherwise, transplantation of bone marrow from ER{alpha}–/– mice did not have any impact on the protective effect of E2, indicating that the protective targets of E2 are not bone marrow–derived cells.40 All of these data suggest that, rather than neovascularization involving endothelial progenitor cells, the early collateral remodeling is critical for future survival of the skin and consequently for the protective effect by E2.

We propose the following mechanism of protection by E2 (Figure 8). (1) E2 modifies the structure–function characteristics of the skin, which (2) favors skin survival including dermis and vessels integrity. In the meantime, (3) collateral remodeling occurs and allows skin reperfusion. Because the vascular network is protected in E2-treated mice, reperfusion induces revascularization of the skin flap. Conversely, in the absence of E2, the vascular network is damaged, and this is followed by vessel leakage and strong damage. Thus, preservation of the vascular network associated with arteriogenesis appeared as the prominent mechanism accounting for the protective effect of E2 against ischemia-associated necrosis. In addition, E2 was reported to accelerate cutaneous wound healing through TGF-β secretion.11 TGF-β is important at the final healing phase to resolve inflammation and reconstitute the extracellular matrix. We confirmed this effect using a TGF-β–neutralizing antibody, which delayed wound healing.


Figure 8
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 8. Proposed mechanism of protection by E2. The 4 major vascular pedicles were sectioned during surgery, creating a severe ischemia. On day 2, E2 promotes survival of the skin as compared to untreated mice and consequently better preserves the vascular network. On days 2 to 4, collateral remodeling on the top of the flap permitted reperfusion of the quasitotal surface of the flap, thus reducing necrosis in E2-treated animals. In untreated animals, although collateral remodeling has occurred, the vascular network is damaged and leaky. Then, the reperfusion induces strong hemorrhages resulting in strong necrosis.

Tamoxifen has partial agonist or antagonist estrogenic activities in different tissues41 and has been recently shown to accelerate cutaneous wound healing.42 We report here that tamoxifen is as efficient as E2 to prevent skin flap necrosis, providing a new perspective in patients undergoing reconstructive surgery after breast cancer. Moreover, the effects on skin structure are close to those of E2, suggesting that tamoxifen acts as an estrogen-like molecule in this tissue. Recent data showing that this selective estrogen receptor modulator confers estrogenic effect in various vascular systems43,44 are in agreement with the vascular protection evidenced in the present model.

In summary, we demonstrated here for the first time that a short administration of E2 prevents ischemia-induced skin necrosis. E2 thus delayed progression of the wavefront of ischemic cell death described by Reimer et al,45 preserving the vascular network that facilitates reperfusion. These observational data are important for the different models of ischemia/reperfusion.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Prof J.P. Chavoin (Service de Chirurgie Plastique et Reconstructrice, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France) for helpful discussions, Jean-Christophe Albouys (Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale) for invaluable technical assistance, C. Bleuart (Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse) for technical support in histology, and Bruno Payré (Centre de Microscopie Electronique Appliquée à la Biologie, Faculté de Médecine de Rangueil, Toulouse) for transmission electronic microscopy studies. We are also grateful to Y. Barreira and C. Evra for assistance at the animal facility (IFR31, Toulouse).

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by Laboratoires Pierre Fabre Dermocosmetique (Centre Européen de Recherche sur la Peau et les Epithéliums de Revêtements [CERPER], Toulouse, France); Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, University Toulouse III; European Genomics Network no. 503254; and Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ISchERMdiol). C.E.T. was supported by a fellowship from Ministére de l’Education Nationale, de la Recherche et de la Technologie (MENRT).

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
*Both authors contributed equally to this work. Back

Original received October 5, 2007; resubmission received July 1, 2008; revised resubmission received October 28, 2008; accepted November 21, 2008.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Fujihara Y, Koyama H, Nishiyama N, Eguchi T, Takato T. Gene transfer of bFGF to recipient bed improves survival of ischemic skin flap. Br J Plast Surg. 2005; 58: 511–517.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Zacchigna S, Papa G, Antonini A, Novati F, Moimas S, Carrer A, Arsic N, Zentilin L, Visintini V, Pascone M, Giacca M. Improved survival of ischemic cutaneous and musculocutaneous flaps after vascular endothelial growth factor gene transfer using adeno-associated virus vectors. Am J Pathol. 2005; 167: 981–991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Liu PY, Liu K, Wang XT, Badiavas E, Rieger-Christ KM, Tang JB, Summerhayes IC. Efficacy of combination gene therapy with multiple growth factor cDNAs to enhance skin flap survival in a rat model. DNA Cell Biol. 2005; 24: 751–757.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Epstein SE, Kornowski R, Fuchs S, Dvorak HF. Angiogenesis therapy: amidst the hype, the neglected potential for serious side effects. Circulation. 2001; 104: 115–119.[Free Full Text]

5. Hurn PD, Brass LM. Estrogen and stroke: a balanced analysis. Stroke. 2003; 34: 338–341.[Free Full Text]

6. Murphy SJ, McCullough LD, Smith JM. Stroke in the female: role of biological sex and estrogen. ILAR J. 2004; 45: 147–159.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. Kyriakides ZS, Kremastinos DT, Karayannakos P. Estrogen stimulates angiogenesis in normoperfused skeletal muscle in rabbits. Circulation. 2001; 103: e107–e108.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Losordo DW, Isner JM. Estrogen and angiogenesis: a review. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001; 21: 6–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Alvarez RJ, Gips SJ, Moldovan N, Wilhide CC, Milliken EE, Hoang AT, Hruban RH, Silverman HS, Dang CV, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ. 17beta-estradiol inhibits apoptosis of endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997; 237: 372–381.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Ashcroft GS, Greenwell-Wild T, Horan MA, Wahl SM, Ferguson MW. Topical estrogen accelerates cutaneous wound healing in aged humans associated with an altered inflammatory response. Am J Pathol. 1999; 155: 1137–1146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Ashcroft GS, Dodsworth J, van Boxtel E, Tarnuzzer RW, Horan MA, Schultz GS, Ferguson MW. Estrogen accelerates cutaneous wound healing associated with an increase in TGF-beta1 levels. Nat Med. 1997; 3: 1209–1215.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Ashcroft GS, Mills SJ, Lei K, Gibbons L, Jeong MJ, Taniguchi M, Burow M, Horan MA, Wahl SM, Nakayama T. Estrogen modulates cutaneous wound healing by downregulating macrophage migration inhibitory factor. J Clin Invest. 2003; 111: 1309–1318.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Dupont S, Krust A, Gansmuller A, Dierich A, Chambon P, Mark M. Effect of single and compound knockouts of estrogen receptors alpha (ERalpha) and beta (ERbeta) on mouse reproductive phenotypes. Development. 2000; 127: 4277–4291.[Abstract]

14. Mallat Z, Gojova A, Marchiol-Fournigault C, Esposito B, Kamate C, Merval R, Fradelizi D, Tedgui A. Inhibition of transforming growth factor-beta signaling accelerates atherosclerosis and induces an unstable plaque phenotype in mice. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 930–934.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Ceradini DJ, Kulkarni AR, Callaghan MJ, Tepper OM, Bastidas N, Kleinman ME, Capla JM, Galiano RD, Levine JP, Gurtner GC. Progenitor cell trafficking is regulated by hypoxic gradients through HIF-1 induction of SDF-1. Nat Med. 2004; 10: 858–864.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Tepper OM, Galiano RD, Capla JM, Kalka C, Gagne PJ, Jacobowitz GR, Levine JP, Gurtner GC. Human endothelial progenitor cells from type II diabetics exhibit impaired proliferation, adhesion, and incorporation into vascular structures. Circulation. 2002; 106: 2781–2786.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Gelis C, Girard S, Mavon A, Delverdier M, Paillous N, Vicendo P. Assessment of the skin photoprotective capacities of an organo-mineral broad-spectrum sunblock on two ex vivo skin models. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2003; 19: 242–253.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Muller-Rover S, Handjiski B, van der Veen C, Eichmuller S, Foitzik K, McKay IA, Stenn KS, Paus R. A comprehensive guide for the accurate classification of murine hair follicles in distinct hair cycle stages. J Invest Dermatol. 2001; 117: 3–15.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Crowe MJ, Doetschman T, Greenhalgh DG. Delayed wound healing in immunodeficient TGF-beta 1 knockout mice. J Invest Dermatol. 2000; 115: 3–11.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Green S, Walter P, Kumar V, Krust A, Bornert JM, Argos P, Chambon P. Human oestrogen receptor cDNA: sequence, expression and homology to v-erb-A. Nature. 1986; 320: 134–139.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Kuiper GG, Enmark E, Pelto-Huikko M, Nilsson S, Gustafsson JA. Cloning of a novel receptor expressed in rat prostate and ovary. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93: 5925–5930.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Carpenter KD, Korach KS. Potential biological functions emerging from the different estrogen receptors. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006; 1092: 361–373.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Won CK, Kim MO, Koh PO. Estrogen modulates Bcl-2 family proteins in ischemic brain injury. J Vet Med Sci. 2006; 68: 277–280.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Simpkins JW, Wen Y, Perez E, Yang S, Wang X. Role of nonfeminizing estrogens in brain protection from cerebral ischemia: an animal model of Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005; 1052: 233–242.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Kim JK, Pedram A, Razandi M, Levin ER. Estrogen prevents cardiomyocyte apoptosis through inhibition of reactive oxygen species and differential regulation of p38 kinase isoforms. J Biol Chem. 2006; 281: 6760–6767.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Wang M, Tsai BM, Reiger KM, Brown JW, Meldrum DR. 17-beta-Estradiol decreases p38 MAPK-mediated myocardial inflammation and dysfunction following acute ischemia. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2006; 40: 205–212.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Kanda N, Watanabe S. 17beta-estradiol inhibits oxidative stress-induced apoptosis in keratinocytes by promoting Bcl-2 expression. J Invest Dermatol. 2003; 121: 1500–1509.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Uzuka M, Nakajima K, Ohta S, Mori Y. Induction of hyaluronic acid synthetase by estrogen in the mouse skin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981; 673: 387–393.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Gendimenico GJ, Mack VJ, Siock PA, Mezick JA. Topical estrogens: their effects on connective tissue synthesis in hairless mouse skin. Arch Dermatol Res. 2002; 294: 231–236.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Tammi R, Pasonen-Seppanen S, Kolehmainen E, Tammi M. Hyaluronan synthase induction and hyaluronan accumulation in mouse epidermis following skin injury. J Invest Dermatol. 2005; 124: 898–905.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Chen WY, Abatangelo G. Functions of hyaluronan in wound repair. Wound Repair Regen. 1999; 7: 79–89.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Shi J, Zhang YQ, Simpkins JW. Effects of 17beta-estradiol on glucose transporter 1 expression and endothelial cell survival following focal ischemia in the rats. Exp Brain Res. 1997; 117: 200–206.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Spyridopoulos I, Sullivan AB, Kearney M, Isner JM, Losordo DW. Estrogen-receptor-mediated inhibition of human endothelial cell apoptosis. Estradiol as a survival factor. Circulation. 1997; 95: 1505–1514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Bake S, Sohrabji F. 17beta-estradiol differentially regulates blood-brain barrier permeability in young and aging female rats. Endocrinology. 2004; 145: 5471–5475.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Hyder SM, Stancel GM, Chiappetta C, Murthy L, Boettger-Tong HL, Makela S. Uterine expression of vascular endothelial growth factor is increased by estradiol and tamoxifen. Cancer Res. 1996; 56: 3954–3960.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Garmy-Susini B, Delmas E, Gourdy P, Zhou M, Bossard C, Bugler B, Bayard F, Krust A, Prats AC, Doetschman T, Prats H, Arnal JF. Role of fibroblast growth factor-2 isoforms in the effect of estradiol on endothelial cell migration and proliferation. Circ Res. 2004; 94: 1301–1309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. van Weel V, Toes RE, Seghers L, Deckers MM, de Vries MR, Eilers PH, Sipkens J, Schepers A, Eefting D, van Hinsbergh VW, van Bockel JH, Quax PH. Natural killer cells and CD4+ T-cells modulate collateral artery development. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007; 27: 2310–2318.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Iwakura A, Luedemann C, Shastry S, Hanley A, Kearney M, Aikawa R, Isner JM, Asahara T, Losordo DW. Estrogen-mediated, endothelial nitric oxide synthase-dependent mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells contributes to reendothelialization after arterial injury. Circulation. 2003; 108: 3115–3121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Tepper OM, Capla JM, Galiano RD, Ceradini DJ, Callaghan MJ, Kleinman ME, Gurtner GC. Adult vasculogenesis occurs through in situ recruitment, proliferation, and tubulization of circulating bone marrow-derived cells. Blood. 2005; 105: 1068–1077.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Aicher A, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Mobilizing endothelial progenitor cells. Hypertension. 2005; 45: 321–325.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Shang Y, Brown M. Molecular determinants for the tissue specificity of SERMs. Science. 2002; 295: 2465–2468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Hardman MJ, Emmerson E, Campbell L, Ashcroft GS. Selective estrogen receptor modulators accelerate cutaneous wound healing in ovariectomized female mice. Endocrinology. 2008; 149: 551–557.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Tsang SY, Yao X, Chan HY, Chan FL, Leung CS, Yung LM, Au CL, Chen ZY, Laher I, Huang Y. Tamoxifen and estrogen attenuate enhanced vascular reactivity induced by estrogen deficiency in rat carotid arteries. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007; 73: 1330–1339.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Savolainen-Peltonen H, Luoto NM, Kangas L, Hayry P. Selective estrogen receptor modulators prevent neointima formation after vascular injury. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2004; 227: 9–20.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

45. Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, Jennings RB. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death. 1. Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation. 1977; 56: 786–794.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related Article:

Sex Hormones Save Our Skin: The Vascular Networking of Estrogen
Nikos Werner and Georg Nickenig
Circ. Res. 2009 104: 135-137. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
N. Werner and G. Nickenig
Sex Hormones Save Our Skin: The Vascular Networking of Estrogen
Circ. Res., January 30, 2009; 104(2): 135 - 137.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/2/245    most recent
CIRCRESAHA.108.182410v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Toutain, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lenfant, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Toutain, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lenfant, F.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*ESTRADIOL
*TAMOXIFEN
Related Collections
Right arrow Angiogenesis
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Ischemic biology - basic studies
Right arrow Other Vascular biology
Right arrowRelated Article