| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cellular Biology |
From the Department of Life Sciences (Y.S.B., J.H.L., S.K.), Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea; and Department of Medicine (S.H.C., F.A., J.L.W., Y.I.M.), University of California, San Diego.
Correspondence to Yun Soo Bae, Department of Life Sciences, Ewha Womans University, 11-1 Daehyun-Dong, Seodaemoon-Gu, Seoul 120-750, Korea. E-mail baeys{at}ewha.ac.kr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 phosphorylation and protein kinase C membrane translocation. Importantly, the phospholipase C
1 phosphorylation was reduced in J774 cells expressing Syk-specific short hairpin RNA. Nox2 modulated mmLDL activation of macrophages by regulating the expression of proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and RANTES. We showed that purified RANTES was able to stimulate migration of mouse aortic smooth muscle cells and addition of neutralizing antibody against RANTES abolished the migration of mouse aortic smooth muscle cells stimulated by mmLDL-stimulated macrophages. These results suggest that mmLDL induces generation of ROS through sequential activation of TLR4, Syk, phospholipase C
1, protein kinase C, and gp91phox/Nox2 and thereby stimulates expression of proinflammatory cytokines. These data help explain mechanisms by which endogenous ligands, such as mmLDL, can induce TLR4-dependent, proatherogenic activation of macrophages.
Key Words: minimally oxidized LDL reactive oxygen species NADPH oxidase 2 RANTES atherosclerosis
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We and others demonstrated that Nox isozymes can be activated by Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which are key regulators of innate immunity.3,4 TLRs recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns on the surface of pathogens, as well as altered host proteins and lipoproteins and stimulate inflammatory signaling pathways.5,6 We reported that the stimulation of TLR4 with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induces ROS generation and nuclear factor (NF)-
B activation and that this process is mediated by the interaction of TLR4 with Nox4.4 Moreover, we have demonstrated that Nox4-dependent ROS generation plays an important role in LPS-induced proinflammatory cytokine production by endothelial cells (ECs) and activation, leading to adhesion molecule expression.7 These results suggest that EC-generated ROS may play an important role in the process of atherogenesis because infiltration of blood vessel intima by leukocytes, aided by the expression of chemokines and adhesion molecules, is an initial and rate-limiting step in the development of atherosclerotic lesions.8 Indeed, increased levels of superoxide have been found in atherosclerotic lesions in human coronary arteries of explanted hearts, which were accompanied by increased expression of gp91phox and p22phox in phagocytic cells and of Nox4 in nonphagocytic cells in the lesions.9
Oxidation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is a major pathogenic factor in the development of atherosclerosis.10 Extensively oxidized LDL (OxLDL) accumulates in atherosclerotic lesions and activates macrophages and other vascular cells. The resulting chronic inflammation in the vascular wall makes atherosclerotic plaques vulnerable to rupture, leading to acute cardiovascular events. Because TLR4 and TLR2 are key regulators of inflammation and MyD88 is an adaptor molecule essential for the TLR4- and TLR2-mediated signaling, several laboratories studied atherogenesis in TLR4-, TLR2-, and MyD88-deficient mice. In general, these knockout mice have no obvious phenotype, but they are unresponsive to specific microbial TLR ligands. When crossed to apolipoprotein (apo)E–/– or LDLR–/– mice and fed a high-fat diet, TLR4-, TLR2-, and MyD88-deficient mice developed less atherosclerosis than apoE–/– or LDLR–/– controls.11–13 We have developed and characterized a model of minimally oxidized LDL (mmLDL), which interacts with CD14 and activates cytoskeletal rearrangements in macrophages and induces secretion of certain cytokines via TLR4.14,15 Because mmLDL activates TLR4 in macrophages and TLR4 mediates Nox4 activation in ECs, we asked whether mmLDL induces TLR4-mediated activation of Nox2, the predominant NADPH oxidase in macrophages. In this report, we demonstrate that mmLDL stimulates ROS generation in macrophages via activation of TLR4 and a subsequent signaling cascade involving Syk, phospholipase (PL)C
, PKC, and Nox2. Moreover, we report that the production and functional role of specific proinflammatory cytokines in response to mmLDL requires the presence of Nox2.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
To identify the specific species of ROS generated, we used an adenovirus expressing mutant catalase with the COOH-terminal KANL peroxisomal targeting sequence deleted (pAd5-CMV-Cat
P, deleted K524ANL527). This mutation results in the Cat
P localization in the cytosol instead of its targeting to the peroxisomes compartment, and the enzyme retains its catalytic activity.16,17 Expression of mutant catalase (Cat
P) in J774 cells resulted in inhibited DCFH oxidation, indicating that the generated ROS species are effectively reduced. Therefore, it appears that hydrogen peroxide is a dominant component of the ROS generated (Figure I in the online data supplement).
Gp91phox/Nox2 Is Responsible for mmLDL-Induced ROS Generation
Several lines of evidence indicate that ROS generation is mediated by an NADPH oxidase complex in phagocytic cells, in which gp91phox/Nox2 is the major catalytic component.18 First, we explored whether gp91phox/Nox2 was involved in the mmLDL-dependent ROS generation in J774 cells. We generated a retrovirus encoding a siRNA specific to gp91phox/Nox2. J774 cells infected with the retrovirus-gp91phox/Nox2 siRNA exhibited a marked reduction in the expression of endogenous gp91phox/Nox2 (Figure 2B) and failed to generate ROS in response to mmLDL, whereas cells infected with the control virus generated a robust ROS response (Figure 2A). Next, we explored whether peritoneal resident macrophages from gp91phox/Nox2 knockout (gp91phox/Nox2–/–) mice would have a blunted ROS response to mmLDL. Indeed, gp91phox/Nox2-deficient macrophages, identified as CD11b-positive cells in the peritoneal cell lavage, exhibited significantly reduced ROS levels in response to mmLDL compared to wild-type macrophages (Figure 2C). These results indicate that gp91phox/Nox2 is responsible for mmLDL-induced ROS generation in macrophages.
|
mmLDL-Induced ROS Generation Is Mediated by TLR4 and Syk
Peritoneal macrophages from TLR4 knockout mice, stimulated with mmLDL, failed to generate ROS, whereas macrophages from MyD88 knockout mice showed a normal ROS response (Figure 2D), indicating that mmLDL-induced ROS generation depends on the presence of TLR4 but not MyD88.
We previously showed that LPS-induced ROS generation and NF-
B activation in HEK293T cells was mediated by a direct interaction of TLR4 with Nox4.7 In this study, we found that, unlike Nox4, the COOH-terminal domain of Nox2 displayed only a weak interaction with TLR4 (Figure 2E), which is unlikely to account for the Nox2 activation. These results suggest that rather than a direct interaction, TLR4 activates Nox2 via a complex signaling pathway.
Because MyD88 was not involved in the mmLDL-induced ROS generation, we searched for a kinase that would associate with TLR4 in response to mmLDL and activate a signaling cascade leading to the Nox2-depenent ROS generation. We found that in J774 macrophages stimulated with mmLDL, spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) coimmunoprecipitated with TLR4 (Figure 3A and supplemental Figure IIA). In addition, Syk was phosphorylated in response to mmLDL (Figure 3B and supplemental Figure II, B). To confirm the functional connection between Syk and TLR4, TLR4 shRNA was transfected into J774 cells and the phosphorylation of Syk was examined in a FACS assay. The TLR4 knockdown (
60%) abolished mmLDL-induced Syk phosphorylation (supplemental Figure III).
|
Next, we examined whether Syk regulates gp91phox/Nox2 and ROS generation. Pretreatment of J774 cells with piceatannol, a pharmacological inhibitor of Syk, reduced ROS generation in response to mmLDL in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 4A). To provide specific evidence for a role of Syk, J774 cells were transfected with a Syk-specific shRNA or a control vector for 48 hours. Syk protein expression was significantly reduced, and the Syk-deficient cells failed to generate ROS in response to mmLDL, whereas cells transfected with control shRNA exhibited normal ROS levels (Figure 4B). These results indicate that Syk is a key upstream regulatory molecule in mmLDL-induced ROS generation.
|
Activation of Nox2 requires its interaction with GTP-bound Rac. Indeed, mmLDL induced Rac activation in control J774 cells but not in Syk knockdown cells (supplemental Figure IV). These results support the hypothesis that Syk regulates mmLDL-induced Nox2 activation in macrophages.
Activation of PLC
1 and PKC by mmLDL
A protein tyrosine kinase activity is known to phosphorylate PLC
1 at Y783, which, in turn, attracts PKC to the membrane, where it is activated. The sequential activation of PLC
1 and PKC leads to Nox2 activation and ROS generation.19 Thus, we tested whether mmLDL-induced Syk activation stimulates PLC
1 phosphorylation. Treatment of J774 cells with mmLDL resulted in a concentration-dependent increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC
1 (Figure 5A and supplemental Figure V, A). Transfection of J774 cells with Syk-specific shRNA abolished mmLDL-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of PLC
1 compared to that seen with control shRNA (Figure 5B and supplemental Figure V, B).
|
A PKC-dependent phosphorylation of p47phox leads to its association with and activation of gp91phox/Nox2. We analyzed mmLDL-dependent activation of PKC
in terms of its membrane translocation using a subcellular fractionation assay and an immunocytochemical analysis. J774 cells were stimulated with mmLDL and then the cytosol and plasma membranes were separated (see Materials and Methods). mmLDL stimulated translocation of PKC
from cytosol to the plasma membrane in a time-dependent manner (Figure 5C). This result was confirmed by examining PKC
distribution in cells stimulated with mmLDL, which resulted in PKC
translocation from the cytosol to the membrane and its concentration in areas of actin polymerization (Figure 5D). Thus, mmLDL-induced activation of Syk and PLC
stimulates PKC
activation in macrophages, leading to Nox2-dependent ROS generation.
Gp91phox/Nox2-Dependent Expression of Proinflammatory Cytokines in Response to mmLDL
Because proinflammatory cytokines play an important role in atherogenesis, we next analyzed the time-dependent cytokine expression in peritoneal macrophages from wild-type or Nox2 knockout mice (Figure 6). Quantitative real-time PCR demonstrated that mmLDL induced expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-2, MIP-1
, interleukin (IL)-1β, RANTES, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-
, IL-10, and IL-6, which all peaked 2 hours poststimulation. Remarkably, mmLDL-induced expression of RANTES, IL-1β, and IL-6 was significantly reduced in Nox2–/– macrophages compared to wild type, whereas the expression of MCP-1, MIP-1, MIP-2, and TNF-
was unchanged or nonsignificantly reduced. In contrast, the expression of antiinflammatory IL-10 in Nox2–/– macrophages tended to increase, but the difference was not statistically significant. To corroborate the results with primary Nox2–/– macrophages, we tested the cytokine expression in Nox2 knockdown J774 cells stimulated with mmLDL and found that the expression of IL-6, IL-1β, and RANTES was Nox2-dependent, although the expression levels in J774 cells were significantly lower than in primary macrophages (supplemental Figure VI). These experiments with Nox2-deficient macrophages suggest that mmLDL stimulates both Nox2-dependent and -independent expression of cytokines and that the cellular redox state selectively regulates specific macrophage functions.
|
Stimulation of Mouse Aortic Smooth Muscle Cell Migration by RANTES
Peritoneal macrophages from wild-type or Nox2–/– mice were plated in the bottom chamber of Transwells and stimulated with mmLDL. Upper chambers with mouse aortic smooth muscle cells (MASMCs) were subsequently assembled with the bottom chambers to induce migration of MASMCs. Wild-type macrophages stimulated by mmLDL led to a significantly higher level of MASMC migration compared to Nox2–/– (Figure 7A), suggesting that mmLDL stimulated macrophage secretion of a potent chemokine in an Nox2-dependent manner. Because our gene expression data above demonstrated that RANTES expression was Nox2-dependent (Figure 6 and supplemental Figure VI), we examined whether RANTES was responsible for the MASMC migration. First, we demonstrated that the secretion of RANTES protein was induced by mmLDL in wild-type, but not Nox2–/–, macrophages (Figure 7B). Addition of recombinant RANTES to the culture system induced MASMC migration (Figure 7C). Furthermore, when a neutralizing antibody against RANTES was added to the lower chamber with mmLDL-stimulated macrophages, the migration of MASMCs was suppressed to the control level (Figure 7D). These data collectively suggest that the mmLDL-induced, Nox2-mediated RANTES expression in macrophages is a likely mechanism leading to SMC migration.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previously, we reported that TLR4 directly interacts with and activates the Nox4 isozyme in human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) and HEK293 cells, leading to the generation of ROS.4,7 Nox4 is mainly expressed in fibroblasts and epithelial and endothelial cells, whereas expression of Nox2 is restricted mainly to hematopoietic cells. In this report, we confirm that peritoneal macrophages and J774 cells predominantly express Nox2. Whereas TLR4 directly binds to Nox4 in HAECs, a yeast 2-hybrid study detected only a weak binding of Nox2 to TLR4 in macrophages (Figure 2E), which is, based on our experience with the yeast 2-hybrid system, unlikely to have any biological importance. Thus, TLR4-mediated activation of Nox2 in macrophages likely occurs by a pathway distinct from that observed for TLR4 and Nox4 in ECs.
Because mmLDL-induced Nox2 activation in macrophages was MyD88-independent (Figure 2D) and because the TLR4 and Nox2 direct interaction was insignificant (Figure 2E), we sought a signaling pathway that would link TLR4 with Nox2. A canonical mechanism of Nox2 activation requires activated PKC. In turn, PKC activation is regulated by a PLC
-catalyzed hydrolysis of PIP2 (phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate) into IP3 (inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate) and DAG (diacylglycerol), the latter being a specific PKC activator.19,21,23 Syk is among the tyrosine kinases that phosphorylates Tyr783 of PLC
. Syk has been mainly implicated in lymphocyte development, integrin signaling pathways and in regulation of phagocytosis.24–27 Recent studies suggested that Syk may be constitutively associated with TLR4 in monocytic cells and that the TLR4-Syk interaction can be stimulated by LPS in neutrophils.25,26 Remarkably, our data demonstrated that the mmLDL induced activation of TLR4 in macrophages led to a similar recruitment of Syk to TLR4 and Syk phosphorylation (Figure 3). In turn, Syk was required for mmLDL-induced PLC
activation and ROS generation (Figures 4 and 5
). In support of this pathway, we demonstrated that mmLDL induced the membrane translocation of PKC (Figure 5C and 5D), a necessary step in Nox2 activation. Thus, our results suggest that the ROS generation by mmLDL involves the sequential activation of TLR4, Syk, PLC
, PKC, and Nox2 (Figure 8).
|
Several groups have reported that ROS play an important role in NF-
B–dependent inflammatory processes.28,29 For example, we demonstrated that TLR4/Nox4-mediated ROS generation in HAECs was necessary for LPS-induced NF-
B activation and expression of IL-8, MCP-1, and intercellular adhesion molecule-1.7 Likewise, in macrophages, mmLDL induced the expression of a number of cytokines, such as MCP-1, MIP-2, TNF-
, and IL-6, but only the MIP-2 expression was clearly MyD88-dependent.15 In the present study, we used primary peritoneal macrophages from wild-type and Nox2–/– mice to determine the ability of mmLDL to induce cytokine expression. In these studies, mmLDL induced 8 different cytokines (MCP-1, MIP-2, TNF-
, IL-6, IL-1β, RANTES, and IL-10) (Figure 7). From this set, 3 of them (IL-1β, RANTES, and IL-6) were significantly downregulated in Nox2–/– macrophages, implying that their regulation was redox-dependent. The results showing that the MIP-2 expression was not significantly affected in Nox2–/– cells (Figure 6) and that the ROS generation was MyD88-independent (Figure 2D) agree with our previous data showing that MIP-2 expression was MyD88-dependent.15 These data suggest that the mmLDL engagement of TLR4 stimulates at least 2 independent pathways, one via MyD88 and another mediated by Syk, the latter leading to Nox2 activation and the redox-sensitive expression of IL-1β, RANTES, and IL-6 (Figure 8).
Our data demonstrate that mmLDL activates TLR4, which, in turn, initiates an intracellular signaling cascade, leading to Nox2-mediated ROS generation, culminating in the secretion of IL-1β, IL-6, and RANTES, which are proinflammatory and likely proatherogenic. IL-6 has been implicated in atherogenesis. IL-6 expression is significantly reduced in carriers bearing a TLR4 ASP299GLY polymorphism, which is associated with a significantly lower frequency of myocardial infarction compared to the control population.30 Both MyD88-dependent and MyD88-independent pathways may stimulate IL-6 expression.31 In this study, we provide evidence that the Nox2-mediated ROS generation is MyD88-independent (Figure 2) and that this Nox2 activity regulates the IL-6 expression (Figure 6). RANTES and IL-1β have also been shown to have a functional role in atherogenesis. Kirii et al have demonstrated that atherosclerotic lesion size of IL-1β–/– apoE–/– mice is significantly smaller than that in IL-1β+/+apoE–/– mice.32 Through its binding to CCR5, RANTES stimulates both the recruitment and transendothelial migration of leukocytes to inflammation sites, thereby facilitating the development of inflammatory vascular lesions.33 We demonstrated that mmLDL-induced Nox2 activity regulated the production of RANTES in macrophages (Figures 6 and 7
B). Remarkably, RANTES antagonists prevent progression of even established atherosclerotic lesions in LDLR–/– mice.34,35 This underscores the relevance and importance of our findings that mmLDL-induced Nox2 activity stimulated the production of RANTES by macrophages (Figures 6 and 7
B), which, in turn, induced MASMC migration (Figure 7A). The specificity of this mmLDL/Nox2 effect was shown in the experiments with Nox2–/– macrophages and with an anti-RANTES antibody, which both blocked the MASMC migration (Figure 7A and 7D). Recently, Yamada et al reported that expression of RANTES was regulated by Syk in nasal fibroblast,36 which would agree with our results placing Syk upstream of the RANTES expression. Taken together, these results suggest that the mmLDL-initiated redox signaling may be involved in the processes of vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis.
Although one would predict that Nox2 would be proinflammatory, and thus proatherogenic, conclusive experimental data to support such a role in vivo are not currently available. The role of p47phox or gp91phox have been evaluated in various murine models by examining whole body knockouts in the background of apoE deficiency.37–39 In one study, the knockout of p47phox decreased lesion formation in the whole aorta, but not at the aortic root.37 In a second study, disruption of p47phox led to no changes in lesion formation at the aortic ring.38 Yet, in a third study, gp91phox knockout led to lowered plasma cholesterol levels, yet no measured decreases in atherosclerosis,39 which, in the setting of lowered plasma cholesterol, might even be interpreted as enhanced lesion formation. The reasons for these differences are not clear but could be related to a differential impact of NADPH oxidase on different stages of lesion development or to its role in different cell types.40 Tissue-specific knockouts will be required to evaluate the latter possibility.
In conclusion, we present a signaling mechanism by which mmLDL stimulates ROS generation in macrophages. The interaction of mmLDL with TLR4 results in the activation of Syk tyrosine kinase, leading to phosphorylation of PLC
1, which, in turn, induces PKC, activation of Rac, and Nox2 activation, resulting in the expression of proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and RANTES (Figure 8). Because mmLDL is likely a component of atherosclerotic lesions, these data define mechanisms by which endogenous ligands, such as mmLDL, can activate TLR4-dependent signaling mechanisms in macrophages that lead to proatherogenic effect.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by the National Core Research Center program (grant R15-2006-020-00000-0) and World Class University program of The Ministry of Education, Science and Technology/Korea Science and Engineering Foundation through Ewha Womans University; Korea Health 21 R&D Project grant A06-00043579 of the Ministry of Health & Welfare; Seoul R&D Program grant 10527; National Research Laboratory Program grant ROA-2007-000-20004-00; NIH grant HL081862 (to Y.I.M.); American Heart Association Grant 0530159N (to Y.I.M.); and a grant from the Leducq Fondation (J.L.W.). Y.S.B. is a recipient of International Exchange Program of LG YeonAm Foundation, and S.K. is a recipient of BK21 scholarship.
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Bedard K, Krause KH. The NOX family of ROS-generating NADPH oxidases: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2007; 87: 245–313.
3. Zhang X, Shan P, Jiang G, Cohn L, Lee PJ. Toll-like receptor 4 deficiency causes pulmonary emphysema. J Clin Invest. 2006; 116: 3050–3059.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Park HS, Jung HY, Park EY, Kim J, Lee WJ, Bae YS. Cutting edge: direct interaction of TLR4 with NAD(P)H oxidase 4 isozyme is essential for lipopolysaccharide-induced production of reactive oxygen species and activation of NF-kappa B. J Immunol. 2004; 173: 3589–3593.
5. Kawai T, Akira S. TLR signaling. Semin Immunol. 2007; 19: 24–32.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Bjorkbacka H. Multiple roles of Toll-like receptor signaling in atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2006; 17: 527–533.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Park HS, Chun JN, Jung HY, Choi C, Bae YS. Role of NADPH oxidase 4 in lipopolysaccharide-induced proinflammatory responses by human aortic endothelial cells. Cardiovasc Res. 2006; 72: 447–455.
8. Charo IF, Ransohoff RM. The many roles of chemokines and chemokine receptors in inflammation. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 610–621.
9. Sorescu D, Weiss D, Lassegue B, Clempus RE, Szocs K, Sorescu GP, Valppu L, Quinn MT, Lambeth JD, Vega JD, Taylor WR, Griendling KK. Superoxide production and expression of nox family proteins in human atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1429–1435.
10. Glass CK, Witztum JL. Atherosclerosis. the road ahead. Cell. 2001; 104: 503–516.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Bjorkbacka H, Kunjathoor VV, Moore KJ, Koehn S, Ordija CM, Lee MA, Means T, Halmen K, Luster AD, Golenbock DT, Freeman MW. Reduced atherosclerosis in MyD88-null mice links elevated serum cholesterol levels to activation of innate immunity signaling pathways. Nat Med. 2004; 10: 416–421.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Michelsen KS, Wong MH, Shah PK, Zhang W, Yano J, Doherty TM, Akira S, Rajavashisth TB, Arditi M. Lack of Toll-like receptor 4 or myeloid differentiation factor 88 reduces atherosclerosis and alters plaque phenotype in mice deficient in apolipoprotein E. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101: 10679–10684.
13. Mullick AE, Tobias PS, Curtiss LK. Modulation of atherosclerosis in mice by Toll-like receptor 2. J Clin Invest. 2005; 115: 3149–3156.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Miller YI, Viriyakosol S, Binder CJ, Feramisco JR, Kirkland TN, Witztum JL. Minimally modified LDL binds to CD14, induces macrophage spreading via TLR4/MD-2, and inhibits phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 1561–1568.
15. Miller YI, Viriyakosol S, Worrall DS, Boullier A, Butler S, Witztum JL. Toll-like receptor 4-dependent and -independent cytokine secretion induced by minimally oxidized low-density lipoprotein in macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 1213–1219.
16. Purdue PE, Lazarow PB. Targeting of human catalase to peroxisomes is dependent upon a novel COOH-terminal peroxisomal targeting sequence. J Cell Biol. 1996; 134: 849–862.
17. Bai J, Rodriguez AM, Melendez JA, Cederbaum AI. Overexpression of catalase in cytosolic or mitochondrial compartment protects HepG2 cells against oxidative injury. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274: 26217–26224.
18. Babior BM. NADPH oxidase. Curr Opin Immunol. 2004; 16: 42–47.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Choi H, Leto TL, Hunyady L, Catt KJ, Bae YS, Rhee SG. Mechanism of angiotensin II-induced superoxide production in cells reconstituted with angiotensin type 1 receptor and the components of NADPH oxidase. J Biol Chem. 2008; 283: 255–267.
20. Patricia MK, Kim JA, Harper CM, Shih PT, Berliner JA, Natarajan R, Nadler JL, Hedrick CC. Lipoxygenase products increase monocyte adhesion to human aortic endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 2615–2622.
21. Boullier A, Li Y, Quehenberger O, Palinski W, Tabas I, Witztum JL, Miller YI. Minimally oxidized LDL offsets the apoptotic effects of extensively oxidized LDL and free cholesterol in macrophages. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26: 1169–1176.
22. Harkewicz R, Hartvigsen K, Almazan F, Dennis EA, Witztum JL, Miller YI. Cholesteryl ester hydroperoxides are biologically active components of minimally oxidized LDL. J Biol Chem. 2008; 283: 10241–10251.
23. Rhee SG. Regulation of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C. Ann Rev Biochem. 2001; 70: 281–312.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Mocsai A, Zhou M, Meng F, Tybulewicz VL, Lowell CA. Syk is required for integrin signaling in neutrophils. Immunity. 2002; 16: 547–558.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Arndt PG, Suzuki N, Avdi NJ, Malcolm KC, Worthen GS. Lipopolysaccharide-induced c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase activation in human neutrophils: role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Syk-mediated pathways. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 10883–10891.
26. Chaudhary A, Fresquez TM, Naranjo MJ. Tyrosine kinase Syk associates with Toll-like receptor 4 and regulates signaling in human monocytic cells. Immunol Cell Biol. 2007; 85: 249–256.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Palacios EH, Weiss A. Distinct roles for Syk and ZAP-70 during early thymocyte development. J Exp Med. 2007; 204: 1703–1715.
28. Gloire G, Legrand-Poels S, Piette J. NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species: fifteen years later. Biochem Pharmacol. 2006; 72: 1493–1505.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Schreck R, Rieber P, Baeuerle PA. Reactive oxygen intermediates as apparently widely used messengers in the activation of the NF-kappa B transcription factor and HIV-1. EMBO J. 1991; 10: 2247–2258.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Candore G, Aquino A, Balistreri CR, Bulati M, Di Carlo D, Grimaldi MP, Listi F, Orlando V, Vasto S, Caruso M, Colonna-Romano G, Lio D, Caruso C. Inflammation, longevity, and cardiovascular diseases: role of polymorphisms of TLR4. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006; 1067: 282–287.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Bagchi A, Herrup EA, Warren HS, Trigilio J, Shin HS, Valentine C, Hellman J. MyD88-dependent and MyD88-independent pathways in synergy, priming, and tolerance between TLR agonists. J Immunol. 2007; 178: 1164–1171.
32. Kirii H, Niwa T, Yamada Y, Wada H, Saito K, Iwakura Y, Asano M, Moriwaki H, Seishima M. Lack of interleukin-1beta decreases the severity of atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 656–660.
33. Duma L, Haussinger D, Rogowski M, Lusso P, Grzesiek S. Recognition of RANTES by extracellular parts of the CCR5 receptor. J Mol Biol. 2007; 365: 1063–1075.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Veillard NR, Kwak B, Pelli G, Mulhaupt F, James RW, Proudfoot AE, Mach F. Antagonism of RANTES receptors reduces atherosclerotic plaque formation in mice. Circ Res. 2004; 94: 253–261.
35. Braunersreuther V, Steffens S, Arnaud C, Pelli G, Burger F, Proudfoot A, Mach F. A novel RANTES antagonist prevents progression of established atherosclerotic lesions in mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008; 28: 1090–1096.
36. Yamada T, Fujieda S, Yanagi S, Yamamura H, Inatome R, Sunaga H, Saito H. Protein-tyrosine kinase Syk expressed in human nasal fibroblasts and its effect on RANTES production. J Immunol. 2001; 166: 538–543.
37. Barry-Lane PA, Patterson C, van der Merwe M, Hu Z, Holland SM, Yeh ET, Runge MS. p47phox is required for atherosclerotic lesion progression in ApoE(–/–) mice. J Clin Investi. 2001; 108: 1513–1522.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Hsich E, Segal BH, Pagano PJ, Rey FE, Paigen B, Deleonardis J, Hoyt RF, Holland SM, Finkel T. Vascular effects following homozygous disruption of p47(phox): an essential component of NADPH oxidase. Circulation. 2000; 101: 1234–1236.
39. Kirk EA, Dinauer MC, Rosen H, Chait A, Heinecke JW, LeBoeuf RC. Impaired superoxide production due to a deficiency in phagocyte NADPH oxidase fails to inhibit atherosclerosis in mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000; 20: 1529–1535.
40. Cathcart MK. Regulation of superoxide anion production by NADPH oxidase in monocytes/macrophages: contributions to atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 23–28.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Vincent, J. M. Hayes, L. L. McLean, A. Vivekanandan-Giri, S. Pennathur, and E. L. Feldman Dyslipidemia-Induced Neuropathy in Mice: The Role of oxLDL/LOX-1 Diabetes, October 1, 2009; 58(10): 2376 - 2385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-H. Choi, R. Harkewicz, J. H. Lee, A. Boullier, F. Almazan, A. C. Li, J. L. Witztum, Y. S. Bae, and Y. I. Miller Lipoprotein Accumulation in Macrophages via Toll-Like Receptor-4-Dependent Fluid Phase Uptake Circ. Res., June 19, 2009; 104(12): 1355 - 1363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |