Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2009;104:124-133
Published online before print November 26, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.176008
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/1/124    most recent
CIRCRESAHA.108.176008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson-Berka, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson-Berka, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, A. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Angiogenesis
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Other Vascular biology
Right arrowRelated Article
(Circulation Research. 2009;104:124.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Integrative Physiology

Identification of a Retinal Aldosterone System and the Protective Effects of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism on Retinal Vascular Pathology

Jennifer L. Wilkinson-Berka, Genevieve Tan, Kassie Jaworski, Antonia G. Miller

From the Department of Immunology, Monash University, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.

Correspondence to Associate Professor Jennifer L. Wilkinson-Berka, Department of Immunology, Monash University, Commercial Rd, Prahran, Victoria, Australia, 3004. E-mail Jennifer.Wilkinson-Berka{at}med.monash.edu.au


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Blockade of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) is being evaluated as a treatment for diabetic retinopathy; however, whether the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and aldosterone influence retinal vascular pathology is unknown. We examined the effect of MR antagonism on pathological angiogenesis in rats with oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR). To determine the mechanisms by which the MR and aldosterone may influence retinal angiogenesis; inflammation and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) were evaluated in OIR and cultured bovine retinal endothelial cells (BRECs) and bovine retinal pericytes (BRPs). In OIR, MR antagonism (spironolactone) was antiangiogenic. Aldosterone may mediate the pathogenic actions of MR in the retina, with 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 mRNA being detected and with aldosterone stimulating proliferation and tubulogenesis in BRECs and exacerbating angiogenesis in OIR, which was attenuated with spironolactone. The MR and aldosterone modulated retinal inflammation, with leukostasis and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 mRNA and protein in OIR being reduced by spironolactone and increased by aldosterone. A reduction in G6PD may be an early response to aldosterone. In BRECs, BRPs, and early OIR, aldosterone reduced G6PD mRNA, and in late OIR, aldosterone increased mRNA for the NAD(P)H oxidase subunit Nox4. A functional retinal MR–aldosterone system was evident with MR expression, translocation of nuclear MR, and aldosterone synthase expression, which was modulated by RAAS blockade. We make the first report that MR and aldosterone influence retinal vasculopathy, which may involve inflammatory and G6PD mechanisms. MR antagonism may be relevant when developing treatments for retinopathies that target the RAAS.


Key Words: aldosterone • mineralocorticoid receptor • retina • angiogenesis • inflammation


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Vision loss and blindness are consequences of the pathological angiogenesis that occurs in retinal diseases such as retinopathy of prematurity and diabetic retinopathy.1 The main treatment is laser photocoagulation, which ablates new blood vessels and the surrounding ischemic tissue.2 However, although this procedure provides benefits, it does not always retard the disease and is damaging to the retina.2 There is considerable interest in developing treatments that target specific angiogenic and inflammatory pathways with the aim of preventing disease progression.

Angiotensin II blockade is a therapeutic candidate for retinopathy, with DIRECT (DIabetic REtinopathy Candesartan Trials) evaluating the efficacy of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) blockade (AT1RB) in diabetic patients.3,4 The impetus for such trials is based on experimental studies in which we and others have shown that a renin–angiotensin system exists in the retina5–7 and is upregulated in experimental retinopathy of prematurity and diabetic retinopathy.5,7,8 Furthermore, angiotensin II blockade is antiangiogenic7–9 and antiinflammatory10 and improves retinal function.11 However, angiotensin II blockade alone may not be sufficient to confer complete retinoprotection in a clinical setting, with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition slowing but not preventing diabetic retinopathy.12

Aldosterone is a steroid hormone that elicits its effects by binding to the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) and is released in response to a variety of stimuli including angiotensin II and changes in salt balance. Aldosterone is a potent stimulator of fibrovascular injury in cardiovascular tissues13,14; however, the mechanisms by which aldosterone adversely affects the vasculature are not fully defined. There is evidence that inflammatory and oxidative stress pathways are involved.13,14 Recently, the enzyme glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) has also been implicated.15 G6PD is a major source of reduced NAD(P)H and serves to maintain redox balance. In terms of inhibiting the actions of aldosterone, it was previously viewed that angiotensin II blockade may be sufficient; however, aldosterone can be still be present because of the phenomenon of "aldosterone escape."16 Aldosterone may also influence pathology independently of angiotensin II17 and potentiate the actions of angiotensin II via activation of the AT1R and angiotensin-converting enzyme.18,19 In support of these findings are trials such as EPHESUS (Eplerenone Postacute myocardial infarction Heart failure Efficacy and SUrvival Study), which reported that AT1RB combined with a MR antagonist has added benefits for cardiovascular disease compared with monotherapy.20,21

Our aim was to determine whether the MR and aldosterone influence retinal vascular pathology in a rat model of oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) that has similarities to retinopathy of prematurity in humans.22 We evaluated whether the actions of aldosterone in the retina involve G6PD and the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate [NAD(P)H oxidase] subunit Nox4. Finally, we examined whether a functional MR–aldosterone system exists in the retina, which can be modulated by the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS).


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Oxygen-Induced Retinopathy
Procedures complied with the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes. OIR was induced in Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats by exposure between postnatal day (P)0 and P11 to 80% O2 cycled with 20% O2 for 3 hours/day. Rats were then in room air until P18 (angiogenesis period).7,8 Shams were in room air from P0 to P18. Groups comprised the following: (1) sham control; (2) OIR control; (3) OIR+spironolactone (Sp); (4) OIR+valsartan; (5) OIR+aldosterone; (6) OIR+salt; (7) OIR+salt+Sp; (8) OIR+salt+valsartan; (9) OIR+aldosterone–salt; (10) OIR+aldosterone–salt+Sp; and (11) OIR+aldosterone–salt+valsartan. Treatments were between P12 and P18. Blood vessel profiles (BVPs) in the inner retina were counted using our previous method.7,8 The MR antagonist Sp (25 mg/kg per day, 10% DMSO/90% olive oil; Sigma-Aldrich) and the AT1RB valsartan (10 mg/kg per day, 0.1 mol/L Tris buffer; Novartis Pharma) were administered by subcutaneous injection. Salt is 1% NaCl given to mothers in drinking water. Aldosterone (0.75 µg/hour, 2% DMSO/0.9% saline, Sigma-Aldrich) was administered to pups by miniosmotic pump (1007D, Alzet) inserted in the flank. The dose of aldosterone is based on previous studies,15 and we found similar increases in plasma aldosterone (OIR control, 39.71±15.61 pmol/L; OIR+aldosterone–salt, 3280±535.86 pmol/L; P<0.005).

Real-Time PCR
See the online data supplement and supplemental Table I, available at http://circres.ahajournals.org. Genes of interest were studied in bovine retinal endothelial cells (BRECs), bovine retinal pericytes (BRPs), and OIR at P18. One exception was G6PD in OIR, which was also studied at P12 plus 8 hours (P12.8). This is because the initial stages of OIR are associated with increased growth and inflammatory mediators in response to retinal hypoxia23 and later subside by P18 when vascular pathology is established. Whether there are temporal changes in G6PD is unknown. On P12, aldosterone was given at 0 and 4 hours at 1 mg/kg body weight (subcutaneous), which is similar to the dose used in miniosmotic pumps in OIR studied at P18. Groups were: (1) sham control (room air only); (2) OIR control; (3) OIR+salt; and (4) OIR+aldosterone+salt.

The online data supplement contains information about isolation of BRECs and BRPs; BREC proliferation and tubulogenesis; translocation of MR in BRECs; leukostasis in OIR; MR and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 immunohistochemistry; and Western blotting.

Statistics
BVP data were subjected to 1-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni post hoc test. All other data were analyzed by a Kruskal–Wallis test followed by individual Mann–Whitney U tests between groups. Values are means±SEM. Significance was P<0.05. Investigators were blinded to the groups.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
In OIR, Angiogenesis Is Reduced With MR Antagonism and Increased With Low Salt and Aldosterone–Salt
OIR controls (20.09±1.83) exhibited a 1.7-fold increase in BVPs compared with shams (11.63±0.83; Figure 1A and 1B). In OIR, Sp reduced BVPs by 56% (15.0±1.00) compared with OIR control (Figure 1C). In OIR, valsartan reduced BVPs (11.83±0.60) to a greater extent than Sp, lowering BVPs to sham levels. In OIR, aldosterone alone had no effect on BVPs (21.94±1.40). Previous studies indicate that low to moderate dietary salt is required for the pathological effects of aldosterone.24 In OIR, 1% NaCl increased BVPs (28.20±1.70) compared with OIR control. In OIR+salt rats treated with Sp (11.00±1.30) or valsartan (9.56±2.01), BVPs were reduced to a similar extent, and the reduction was similar to sham levels. In OIR, aldosterone–salt had the most marked effect, increasing BVPs by 2-fold (39.47±3.30) compared with OIR control. In OIR+aldosterone–salt, Sp (18.18±1.43) and valsartan (15.75±0.49) reduced BVPs to OIR control (Figure 1E).


Figure 1
View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. A through E, Paraffin sections (3 µm) of retina from SD rats with OIR at P18. F, Quantitation of blood vessel profiles (BVPs). ALDO indicates aldosterone; Val, valsartan. Salt is 1% NaCl. Stain is hematoxylin/eosin. Shown are ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), inner nuclear layer (INL). Scale bar=50 µm (n=7 to 9 rats per group). A, Sham showing BVPs (arrow). B, BVPs are increased in retina and vitreous (arrowhead) in OIR control compared with sham (aP<0.005). Both Sp (C) and Val reduced BVPs compared with OIR control (bP<0.01). Val reduced BVPs to a greater extent than Sp (cP<0.05 to OIR+Sp). In OIR, ALDO had no effect on BVPs. In OIR+salt, BVPs were increased compared with OIR control (dP<0.05). In OIR+salt, Sp and Val reduced BVPs to sham (eP<0.05). D, ALDO–salt increased BVPs within the retina and retinal surface (arrowhead) compared with all OIR groups (fP<0.01). In OIR+ALDO–salt, Sp (E) and Val reduced BVPs (arrows) to OIR control (gP<0.01 to OIR+ALDO–salt) but not to sham (hP<0.05). Micrographs for OIR+Val, OIR+salt, OIR+salt+Sp, OIR+salt+Val, and OIR+ALDO–salt+Val are in the online data supplement.

Aldosterone Induces Proliferation and Tubule Formation in BRECs
Aldosterone at 100 pmol/L and 1 nmol/L increased BREC proliferation compared with control (Figure 2A), and the increase was similar to that of VEGF. Aldosterone at 1, 10, and 100 nmol/L increased tubulogenesis compared with control, and the increase was to a similar extent as VEGF (Figure 2B and 2C). BREC proliferation and tubulogenesis was reduced with Sp.


Figure 2
View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. In BRECs, aldosterone (ALDO) induced proliferation (A) and tubulogenesis (B and C), which was reduced with Sp. A, ALDO (100 pmol/L, 1 nmol/L) and 20 ng/mL VEGF increased proliferation to a similar extent compared with control (aP<0.05). Sp reduced proliferation (bP<0.05 to respective ALDO groups) to control levels. B, ALDO (1, 10, and 100 nmol/L) and 20 ng/mL VEGF increased tubulogenesis compared with control (aP<0.05). Sp reduced tubulogenesis (bP<0.05 to respective ALDO groups) to control levels. C, Micrographs showing tubulogenesis. Magnification, x10.

MR Antagonism Reduces Retinal Leukostasis
In OIR, leukostasis was increased 10.3-fold (6.14±0.9) compared with sham (0.59±0.15; Figure 3A and 3B). In OIR, Sp (3.25±0.57) and valsartan (2.56±0.39) reduced leukostasis to a similar extent, although not to sham levels (Figure 3C). Because aldosterone treatment alone had no effect on retinal angiogenesis, it was not studied. Salt treatment increased leukostasis by 1.8-fold (11.55±1.56) compared with OIR control. In OIR+salt, both Sp (1.97±0.46) and valsartan (1.28±0.26) reduced leukostasis. In OIR+aldosterone–salt, leukostasis was increased to a similar extent as salt alone (14.12±1.34; Figure 3D). Sp (4.59±1.46) and valsartan (1.97±0.34) reduced this increase to OIR control (Figure 3E), with valsartan being more antiinflammatory than Sp.


Figure 3
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. A through E, Flat mounts of retina showing leukostasis in SD rats with OIR at P18. F, Leukocytes quantitated in whole retina. ALDO indicates aldosterone. Scale bar=80 µm (n=7 to 10 rats per group). Salt is 1% NaCl. A, In sham control, leukocytes were sparse (arrow). B, In OIR control, leukocytes (arrows) were increased compared with sham control (aP<0.01). In OIR, Sp (C) and Val reduced leukostasis to a similar extent (bP<0.05 to OIR), although not in comparison with sham (cP<0.05). Salt increased leukostasis compared with OIR control (dP<0.05). In OIR+salt, Sp and Val reduced leukostasis compared with OIR+salt (eP<0.05) and with sham. D, In OIR+ALDO–salt, leukostasis was increased compared with OIR control (fP<0.05), and the extent of leukostasis was similar to salt alone. In OIR+ALDO–salt, Sp (E) and Val reduced leukostasis compared with OIR+ALDO–salt (gP<0.05), and Val was more effective than Sp (hP<0.05) in reducing leukostasis when compared with sham. Micrographs for OIR+Val, OIR+salt, OIR+salt+Sp, OIR+salt+Val, and OIR+ALDO–salt+Val are in the online data supplement.

Inflammatory Mediators
MCP-1 mRNA and protein followed a similar pattern as leukostasis. MCP-1 mRNA was increased 7-fold in OIR (7.58±1.26) compared with sham (1.07±0.17; Figure 4A). In OIR, the reduction in MCP-1 mRNA with Sp (4.56±0.90) was not statistically significant compared with OIR control. However, valsartan (0.79±0.32) reduced MCP-1 mRNA to sham (Figure 4A). Salt alone (28.15±5.04) had a marked effect, increasing MCP-1 mRNA 3.7-fold compared with OIR control. Sp (4.05±2.88) and valsartan (3.48±1.87) treatment to OIR+salt animals reduced MCP-1 mRNA to OIR control but not to sham levels. Aldosterone–salt increased MCP-1 mRNA to a similar extent as salt (20.11±3.89), and both Sp (7.13±1.22) and valsartan (4.96±0.64) reduced mRNA to OIR control but not to sham levels (Figure 4A). MCP-1 was detected in blood vessels in the inner retina, ganglion cells, and the inner nuclear layer (Figure 4B and 4C). In general, MCP-1 immunolabeling followed a similar pattern to mRNA. Immunolabeling was weak in shams and increased in OIR and OIR+ALDO–salt; however, immunolabeling tended to be increased in OIR+salt, but this was not statistically significant. In all situations, Sp and valsartan reduced immunolabeling to a similar extent. In OIR+ALDO–salt, this reduction appeared to be largely attributable to a reduction in the number of BVPs. In BRECs and BRPs, aldosterone increased mRNA for intracellular adhesion molecule-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA (supplemental Figure III).


Figure 4
View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. A through C, Gene (A) and protein (B and C) expression for MCP-1 in OIR at P18. ALDO indicates aldosterone; Val, valsartan. Salt is 1% NaCl (n=7 to 8 rats per group). Scale bar=40 µm. A, MCP-1 mRNA is increased in OIR compared with sham (aP<0.005). Sp tended to reduce MCP-1 mRNA, but this was not significant. Val reduced MCP-1 mRNA compared with OIR control (bP<0.005) and sham. In OIR, MCP-1 mRNA was increased to an extent similar to both salt and ALDO–salt compared with OIR control (cP<0.01). In OIR+salt or OIR+ALDO–salt, Sp and Val reduced MCP-1 compared with OIR+salt and OIR+ALDO–salt (dP<0.005) but not compared with sham or OIR+Val (eP<0.05). B and C, MCP-1 immunolabeling was localized to ganglion cells (arrows), blood vessels (arrowheads), and the inner nuclear layer (INL) (asterisks). MCP-1 was weakly expressed in shams (a) and increased in OIR control (aP<0.05) (b). Sp (c) and Val (d) reduced immunolabeling compared with OIR control (bP<0.05) and compared with sham. In OIR+salt (e), immunolabeling tended to be increased but was not significant compared with OIR control. In OIR+salt, Sp (f) and Val (g) reduced immunolabeling compared with OIR+salt (cP<0.05) and compared with sham. In OIR+ALDO–salt (h), immunolabeling was increased compared with OIR control (bP<0.05). In OIR+ALDO–salt, Sp (i) and Val (j) reduced immunolabeling to below that of OIR control (dP<0.05) but not in comparison with sham (eP<0.05).

G6PD mRNA Is Reduced by Aldosterone
In BRECs and BRPs, G6PD mRNA was reduced with 100 nmol/L aldosterone (supplemental Figure III). In OIR at P12.8 hours, G6PD mRNA was increased compared with sham control (Figure 5A), and reduced with both salt and aldosterone–salt to below sham levels. In OIR at P18, there was no difference in G6PD mRNA among all groups (Figure 5B).


Figure 5
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. A and B, G6PD mRNA with real-time PCR in OIR at P12.8 (A) and P18 (B). ALDO indicates aldosterone. Salt is 1% NaCl. n=6 to 7 rats per group. A, At P12.8, G6PD mRNA is increased with OIR compared with sham (aP<0.005) and reduced with salt and aldosterone–salt (bP<0.005 to OIR control) compared with sham (bP<0.005). B, G6PD mRNA is similar among all groups.

Nox4 mRNA Is Increased by Aldosterone
In OIR at P18, Nox4 mRNA was increased (3.4±0.58) compared with sham (0.98±0.09; Figure 6). In OIR, salt increased Nox4 mRNA (6.08±1.85), but this did not reach statistical significance. In OIR, aldosterone–salt increased Nox4 mRNA (8.06±1.40) compared with OIR control.


Figure 6
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Nox4 mRNA with real-time PCR in OIR at P18. ALDO indicates aldosterone. Salt is 1% NaCl. n=6 to 7 rats per group. In OIR and OIR+salt, Nox4 mRNA is increased compared with sham (aP<0.05). In OIR, aldosterone–salt increases Nox4 mRNA compared with OIR control (bP<0.05).

MR Is Expressed in Retina, and in BRECs Is Translocated to the Nucleus by Aldosterone
MR immunolabeling was localized to ganglion cells, the inner nuclear layer, retinal pigment epithelium, and the vasculature (Figure 7A). MR in vascular cells was confirmed in BRECs and BRPs with immunolabeling (Figure 7B and 7C) and real-time PCR (data not shown). BRECs were cultured in concentrations of aldosterone used to evaluate cell function15 and similar to that in plasma of patients with congestive heart failure (Figure 7C and 7D).25 In BRECs incubated with 100 nmol/L aldosterone, MR immunolabeling was reduced in the cytoplasm (67.41±9.69 control; 57.39±2.71 aldosterone) and increased in the nucleus (6.92±2.76 control; 15.83±2.49 aldosterone) compared with control (Figure 7D).


Figure 7
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7. A through C, MR immunolabeling in SD rat retina (A), BRPs (B), and BRECs (C). D, Nuclear translocation of MR in BRECs in response to aldosterone (ALDO). A, Paraffin section (3 µm) shows MR immunolabeling (Alexa red) in the ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner nuclear layer (INL), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Scale bar=90 µm. B, a, In BRPs, MR immunolabeling is detected (Texas red). b, Overlayed with DAPI nuclear counterstain (blue) in merged image. Magnification, x40. C, In BRECs, fluorescein isothiocyanate–lectin identifies endothelial cells (green) (a and c), and MR immunolabeling is shown (Texas red) with DAPI nuclear staining (blue) in merged images (b and d). b, BRECs incubated in control media show MR in both the cytoplasm and nucleus. d, BRECs incubated with 100 nmol/L ALDO show increased MR immunolabeling giving nuclei a purple appearance. Magnification, x40. D, BRECs cultured in control media, 10 nmol/L ALDO, or 100 nmol/L ALDO for 1 hour. Reduced MR immunolabeling in the cytoplasm with 10 nmol/L ALDO compared with control (aP<0.05). MR immunolabeling is increased in nuclei and decreased in cytoplasm with 100 nmol/L ALDO compared with control (aP<0.05, bP<0.01).

11β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 1 and 11β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 2 Are Present in Retina
Gene expression for the enzymes 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type (11β-HSD)1 and 11β-HSD2 were detected in retina from SD rats and in BRECs and BRPs (Figure 8A). In rat retina, 11β-HSD2 was approximately 24-fold lower than rat kidney and adrenal (Figure 8B).


Figure 8
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 8. Gene expression for 11β-HSD1, 11β-HSD2, and aldosterone synthase. A, 11β-HSD1 and 11β-HSD2 are in BRPs, SD retina, and BRECs. B, 11β-HSD2 is {approx}24-fold lower in retina than in kidney and adrenal (aP<0.005). C, Aldosterone synthase mRNA is in sham retina and unchanged with OIR. In OIR, Sp and Val reduced aldosterone synthase mRNA compared with controls (aP<0.01). In OIR, salt increased aldosterone synthase mRNA compared with controls (bP<0.05), whereas Sp had no effect. In OIR+salt, a further increase in mRNA occurred compared with controls and OIR+Sp (cP<0.05). In OIR, aldosterone–salt and aldosterone–salt+Sp had no effect compared with controls but reduced mRNA compared with OIR+salt (dP<0.05). In OIR+aldosterone–salt, Val reduced aldosterone synthase mRNA compared with OIR+aldosterone–salt and OIR+aldosterone–salt+Sp and controls (eP<0.01). n=7 to 8 rats per group.

Retinal Aldosterone Synthase mRNA Is Modulated by Low Salt, the MR, and AT1R
Aldosterone synthase mRNA was detected in retina but not increased with OIR (Figure 8C). In OIR, both Sp (0.71±0.09) and valsartan (0.54±0.07) reduced aldosterone synthase mRNA. Compared to controls, in OIR, salt (1.36±0.09) and salt±Sp increased aldosterone mRNA to the same extent, with a further increase in OIR+valsartan (1.88±0.17). To determine whether retinal renin is affected by salt, renin protein was measured. No significant changes in renin protein were observed between OIR (0.82±0.08) and OIR+salt (0.58±0.14) groups. Aldosterone–salt (0.79±0.13) decreased aldosterone synthase mRNA compared with OIR control. In OIR+aldosterone–salt, Sp (0.85±0.05) had no effect compared with OIR+aldosterone–salt, whereas valsartan (0.57±0.08) reduced aldosterone synthase mRNA.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
To date, a role for MR and aldosterone in retinal pathology, and the existence of a functional MR–aldosterone system in retina has not been addressed. This is potentially important, because angiotensin II blockade is currently being evaluated as a treatment for diabetic retinopathy,3,4 without consideration of MR and the possible involvement of aldosterone. It is established that MR antagonism can reduce vascular injury in cardiorenal tissues13,26; however, whether this occurs in retinopathy is unknown. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report that MR antagonism reduces pathological angiogenesis in retina. An elegant study by Ishida et al27 has shown that inflammation is a causative event in retinal vascular growth. The finding that Sp reduced retinal leukostasis and MCP-1 mRNA and protein in OIR suggests that the protective effects of Sp in OIR may be partly attributable to its antiinflammatory properties. The MR can be activated by either aldosterone or cortisol, with aldosterone mediated effects being determined in large part by the presence of the enzyme 11β-HSD2, which degrades cortisol. Consistent with a role for aldosterone in actions of MR in retina was the demonstration of 11β-HSD2 mRNA in rat retina and cultured retinal vascular cells and the stimulation of angiogenesis of aldosterone both in vitro and in vivo. Emerging evidence indicates that aldosterone influences vascular pathology by a reduction in G6PD and increases in subunits of vascular NAD(P)H oxidase.15 Supporting this concept, we report that the angiogenic effects of aldosterone are accompanied by a reduction in G6PD mRNA and an increase in Nox4 mRNA, a NAD(P)H oxidase subunit that has recently been implicated in angiogenesis.28 Finally, the demonstration in retina of MR, which is active in vascular cells, and aldosterone synthase expression, which is modulated by Sp and AT1RB, may indicate that a functional local MR–aldosterone system influences retinal vascular disease.

In general, little is known about the involvement of MR and aldosterone in angiogenesis. In aldosterone-producing adenomas, vascularization is positively associated with aldosterone,29 and in a corneal micropocket assay and a model of hindlimb ischemia, Sp inhibits angiogenesis.30,31 We make the first report that Sp reduces pathological angiogenesis in OIR. Aldosterone is likely to mediate the pathogenic actions of MR in OIR. We found that aldosterone stimulated proliferation and tubulogenesis in BRECs and exacerbated angiogenesis in OIR and that these events could be attenuated by Sp. In OIR, the effects of Sp on angiogenesis were compared with AT1RB, which we have reported previously to reduce angiogenesis to sham levels.7 In the OIR+Sp group, Sp was not as effective as valsartan, although in OIR+aldosterone, Sp was equally antiangiogenic as valsartan. The reasons for these differences are not known but may relate to the dose of Sp. Overall, these findings suggest that MR and aldosterone influence pathological angiogenesis in retina and that MR antagonism may have a potential therapeutic application in retinopathy.

Inflammation is an important mechanism that contributes to retinal vascular remodeling and, most notably, OIR.28,32 Given that aldosterone is a potent stimulator of inflammation,13,33 and recent evidence indicating that MR modulates the adhesion of leukocytes to endothelial cells,34 we speculated that MR antagonism might influence retinal inflammation. We identify that in OIR, Sp reduced retinal leukostasis to an extent similar to the comparator valsartan. Consistent with this finding was that aldosterone increased the expression of the inflammatory mediators, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, and cyclooxygenase-2 in BRECs and BRPs. A proinflammatory role for aldosterone also occurred in OIR, with aldosterone–salt increasing leukostasis, which was reduced with Sp. Evidence that the chemokine MCP-1 is increased in the ischemic retina23 and leads to macrophage recruitment and subsequent retinal angiogenesis35 led us to study aldosterone and the effects of Sp on retinal MCP-1 expression. We found retinal MCP-1 mRNA and protein to be modulated by aldosterone, with aldosterone–salt increasing MCP-1, which was reduced by Sp. Together, these results suggest a pathogenic role for MR-aldosterone in retinal inflammation.

Leopold et al15 have identified that aldosterone impairs vascular function by reducing G6PD. Consistent with these findings, aldosterone reduced G6PD mRNA in BRECs and BRPs. The early stages of OIR features a dramatic increase in angiogenic and inflammatory factors as an initial response to retinal hypoxia.23 Here, in the early stages of OIR at P12.8, G6PD mRNA was also increased, and consistent with the findings in retinal vascular cells, G6PD mRNA was reduced by aldosterone–salt. In the later stages of OIR at P18, when retinal angiogenesis and inflammation have peaked, G6PD mRNA returned to OIR levels following aldosterone–salt treatment, suggesting that the aldosterone–G6PD axis is most active in the initial stages of OIR.

NAD(P)H oxidase is a multicomponent enzyme that, in vascular tissues, is a major source of reactive oxygen species.36 Separate lines of evidence indicate that the Nox4 subunit of NAD(P)H oxidase is stimulated by hypoxia37 and the RAAS38 and is involved in angiogenesis, with increased expression on newly formed blood vessels.28 For these reasons, we evaluated Nox4 expression in response to aldosterone in OIR. We report that Nox4 mRNA is increased in OIR and that the enhanced pathological angiogenesis that occurs with aldosterone–salt treatment is accompanied by a further increase in Nox4 mRNA. In OIR, salt treatment alone did not increase Nox4 mRNA or angiogenesis to the same extent as aldosterone–salt, suggesting that the combination of aldosterone and salt is required to exacerbate new blood vessel growth in OIR. These findings indicate that Nox4 may participate in aldosterone-related pathological angiogenesis in the ischemic retina.

Accumulating evidence indicates that in addition to some epithelial tissues, nonepithelial tissues also express MR and respond to aldosterone.15,34 Few studies have evaluated the existence of a retinal MR–aldosterone system. We confirm a previous report39 that the MR is present in retina and extend this to reveal that retinal MR is active, with translocation of this nuclear receptor from the cytoplasm to the nucleus in response to aldosterone.40 Aldosterone synthase is the rate-limiting enzyme in aldosterone production. In the adrenal gland and cardiovascular tissues, angiotensin II stimulates aldosterone synthase via the AT1R41 and AT1RB reduces aldosterone-related pathology.18,19 We make the first report that a similar situation occurs in OIR, with AT1RB reducing both aldosterone synthase mRNA– and aldosterone–salt–associated inflammation and angiogenesis. Sp had a similar effect, indicating a role for the MR in the regulation of retinal aldosterone. Given these findings, it is possible that aldosterone may be produced within the retina. However, because exogenous aldosterone also influenced retinal pathology, the contribution of circulating aldosterone cannot be overlooked.

Sodium chloride is the best-known adjunct to the actions of aldosterone stimulating angiotensin II and thereby increasing aldosterone production. Without ample salt, aldosterone has minimal effects on organ pathology. We found a similar situation in OIR, with aldosterone alone having no effect, whereas aldosterone–salt potentiated OIR. Previous studies indicate that a salt diet itself can induce pathology with 1% NaCl treatment for 8 weeks in rats causing cardiac hypertrophy.26 In OIR, salt slightly increased angiogenesis but had a dramatic effect on inflammation, increasing leukostasis and MCP-1 mRNA to a similar extent as aldosterone–salt. These findings may indicate that because OIR normally features an intense inflammatory reaction,27 the retina is particularly sensitive to subsequent salt-induced inflammatory pathways, which once reaching a certain level cannot be further stimulated by aldosterone. Our data would also indicate that salt-induced retinal pathology involves the MR and AT1R, with Sp and valsartan reducing inflammation and angiogenesis. Previous studies suggest that salt may induce pathology via local increases in tissue aldosterone.24 This may also occur in OIR, with salt increasing retinal aldosterone synthase but not altering renin protein. However, the interaction between the AT1R and retinal aldosterone synthase in response to salt in OIR is less clear, with valsartan increasing aldosterone synthase mRNA yet improving OIR. On the other hand, aldosterone–salt in OIR reduced aldosterone synthase mRNA despite increasing pathology. The reasons for these differential responses are unclear and likely to be complex given that a number of factors influence aldosterone synthase expression including blood pressure and cortisol42 and, perhaps, non-RAAS pathways. Furthermore, it is possible that in the circumstance of elevated aldosterone caused by coadministration of aldosterone and salt, retinal angiotensin II downregulates aldosterone synthase production to curtail further pathology. This could be determined by measuring tissue levels of angiotensin II and aldosterone; however, because of the small sample size of rat pup retina, this was not feasible.

In conclusion, we make the major finding that MR antagonism improves pathological angiogenesis in OIR and that this may involve the suppression of aldosterone-induced inflammatory pathways and modulation of factors such as G6PD and Nox4. We also report that a local MR-aldosterone system exists in retina, which can be modulated by MR antagonism and AT1RB. Of possible importance with respect to treatment strategies for retinopathies, including diabetic retinopathy, is that MR antagonism and AT1RB have similar vasculoprotective effects in retina. This may indicate the potential for combination therapy in patients, a strategy that has proven successful for cardiovascular disease.20,21


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Kylie McMaster and Lainie Sutton for technical assistance.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International. J.W.-B. is a National Health and Medical Research Council Senior Research Fellow.

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
Original received June 22, 2008; revision received November 7, 2008; accepted November 13, 2008.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Chen J, Smith LE. Retinopathy of prematurity. Angiogenesis. 2007; 10: 133–140.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Essex RW, Carden SM, Elder JE. Two-year results of laser treatment for retinopathy of prematurity at a single neonatal intensive care unit. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005; 33: 390–394.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Chaturvedi N, Porta M, Klein R, Orchard T, Fuller J, Parving HH, Bilous R, Sjolie AK; DIRECT Programme Study Group. Effect of candesartan on prevention (DIRECT-Prevent 1) and progression (DIRECT-Protect 1) of retinopathy in type 1 diabetes: randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Lancet. 2008; 372: 1394–1402.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Sjolie AK, Klein R, Porta M, Orchard T, Fuller J, Parving HH, Bilous R, Chaturvedi N; DIRECT Programme Study Group. Effect of candesartan on progression and regression of retinopathy in type 2 diabetes (DIRECT-Protect 2): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2008; 372: 1385–1393.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Danser AH, van den Dorpel MA, Deinum J, Derkx FH, Franken AA, Peperkamp E, de Jong PT, Schalekamp MA. Renin, prorenin, and immunoreactive renin in vitreous fluid from eyes with and without diabetic retinopathy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989; 68: 160–167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Berka JL, Stubbs AJ, Wang DZ, DiNicolantonio R, Alcorn D, Campbell DJ, Skinner SL. Renin-containing Muller cells of the retina display endocrine features. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995; 36: 1450–1458.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Sarlos S, Rizkalla B, Moravski CJ, Cao Z, Cooper ME, Wilkinson-Berka JL. Retinal angiogenesis is mediated by an interaction between the angiotensin type 2 receptor, VEGF, and angiopoietin. Am J Pathol. 2003; 163: 879–887.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Moravski CJ, Kelly DJ, Cooper ME, Gilbert RE, Bertram JF, Shahinfar S, Skinner SL, Wilkinson-Berka JL. Retinal neovascularization is prevented by blockade of the renin-angiotensin system. Hypertension. 2000; 36: 1099–1104.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Wilkinson-Berka JL, Tan G, Jaworski K, Ninkovic S. Valsartan but not atenolol improves vascular pathology in diabetic Ren-2 rat retina. Am J Hypertens. 2007; 20: 423–430.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Nagai N, Izumi-Nagai K, Oike Y, Koto T, Satofuka S, Ozawa Y, Yamashiro K, Inoue M, Tsubota K, Umezawa K, Ishida S. Suppression of diabetes-induced retinal inflammation by blocking the angiotensin II type 1 receptor or its downstream nuclear factor-{kappa}B pathway. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48: 4342–4350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Phipps JA, Wilkinson-Berka JL, Fletcher EL. Retinal dysfunction in diabetic Ren-2 rats is ameliorated by treatment with valsartan but not atenolol. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007; 48: 927–934.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Chaturvedi N, Sjolie AK, Stephenson JM, Abrahamian H, Keipes M, Castellarin A, Rogulja-Pepeonik Z, Fuller JH. Effect of lisinopril on progression of retinopathy in normotensive people with type 1 diabetes. The EUCLID Study Group. EURODIAB Controlled Trial of Lisinopril in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus. Lancet. 1998; 351: 28–31.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Rocha R, Martin-Berger CL, Yang P, Scherrer R, Delyani J, McMahon E. Selective aldosterone blockade prevents angiotensin II/salt-induced vascular inflammation in the rat heart. Endocrinology. 2002; 143: 4828–4836.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Hatakeyama H, Miyamori I, Fujita T, Takeda Y, Takeda R, Yamamoto H. Vascular aldosterone. Biosynthesis and a link to angiotensin II-induced hypertrophy of vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem. 1994; 269: 24316–24320.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Leopold JA, Dam A, Maron BA, Scribner AW, Liao R, Handy DE, Stanton RC, Pitt B, Loscalzo J. Aldosterone impairs vascular reactivity by decreasing glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity. Nat Med. 2007; 13: 189–197.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Sato A, Saruta T. Aldosterone escape during angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in essential hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. J Int Med Res. 2001; 29: 13–21.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Funck RC, Wilke A, Rupp H, Brilla CG. Regulation and role of myocardial collagen matrix remodeling in hypertensive heart disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1997; 432: 35–44.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Harada E, Yoshimura M, Yasue H, Nakagawa O. Nakagawa M, Harada M, Mizuno Y, Nakayama M, Shimasaki Y, Ito T, Nakamura S, Kuwahara K, Saito Y, Nakao K, Ogawa H. Aldosterone induces angiotensin-converting-enzyme gene expression in cultured neonatal rat cardiocytes. Circulation. 2001; 104: 137–139.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Robert V, Heymes C, Silvestre JS, Sabri A, Swynghedauw B, Delcayre C. Angiotensin AT1 receptor subtype as a cardiac target of aldosterone: role in aldosterone–salt-induced fibrosis. Hypertension. 1999; 33: 981–986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Pitt B, Williams G, Remme W, Martinez F, Lopez-Sendon J, Zannad F, Neaton J, Roniker B, Hurley S, Burns D, Bittman R, Kleiman J. The EPHESUS trial: eplerenone in patients with heart failure due to systolic dysfunction complicating acute myocardial infarction. Eplerenone Post-AMI Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2001; 15: 79–87.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Sato A, Saruta T, Funder JW. Combination therapy with aldosterone blockade and renin-angiotensin inhibitors confers organ protection. Hypertens Res. 2006; 29: 211–216.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Penn JS, Henry MM, Wall PT, Tolman BL. The range of PaO2 variation determines the severity of oxygen-induced retinopathy in newborn rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995; 36: 2063–2070.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Yoshida S, Yoshida A, Ishibashi T, Elner SG, Elner VM. Role of MCP-1 and MIP-1{alpha} in retinal neovascularization during postischemic inflammation in a mouse model of retinal neovascularization. J Leukoc Biol. 2003; 73: 137–144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Takeda Y, Yoneda T, Demura M, Miyamori I, Mabuchi H. Sodium-induced cardiac aldosterone synthesis causes cardiac hypertrophy. Endocrinology. 2000; 141: 1901–1904.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Silvestre JS, Robert V, Heymes C, Aupetit-Faisant B, Mouas C, Moalic JM, Swynghedauw B, Delcayre C. Myocardial production of aldosterone and corticosterone in the rat. Physiological regulation. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 4883–4891.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Sun Y, Zhang J, Lu L, Chen S, Quinn MT, Weber KT. Aldosterone-induced inflammation in the rat heart: role of oxidative stress. Am J Pathol. 2002; 161: 1773–1781.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Ishida S, Yamashiro K, Usui T, Kaji Y, Ogura Y, Hida T, Honda Y, Oguchi Y, Adamis AP. Leukocytes mediate retinal vascular remodeling during development and vaso-obliteration in disease. Nat Med. 2003; 9: 781–788.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. Jiang F, Zhang G, Hashimoto I, Kumar BS, Bortolotto S, Morrison WA, Dusting GJ. Neovascularization in an arterio-venous loop-containing tissue engineering chamber: role of NADPH oxidase. J Cell Mol Med. 2008; 12: 2062–2072.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Bernini GP, Moretti A, Bonadio AG, Menicagli M, Viacava P, Naccarato AG, Iacconi P, Miccoli P, Salvetti A. Angiogenesis in human normal and pathologic adrenal cortex. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 87: 4961–4965.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Michel F, Ambroisine ML, Duriez M, Delcayre C, Levy BI, Silvestre JS. Aldosterone enhances ischemia-induced neovascularization through angiotensin II-dependent pathway. Circulation. 2004; 109: 1933–1937.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Klauber N, Browne F, Anand-Apte B, D'Amato RJ. New activity of spironolactone. Inhibition of angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Circulation. 1996; 94: 2566–2571.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Knott RM, Robertson M, Muckersie E, Folefac VA, Fairhurst FE, Wileman SM. Forrester JV. A model system for the study of human retinal angiogenesis: activation of monocytes and endothelial cells and the association with the expression of the monocarboxylate transporter type 1 (MCT-1). Diabetologia. 1999; 42: 870–877.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Blasi ER, Rocha R, Rudolph AE, Blomme EA, Polly ML, McMahon EG. Aldosterone/salt induces renal inflammation and fibrosis in hypertensive rats. Kidney Int. 2003; 63: 1791–1800.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Caprio M, Newfell BG, la Sala A, Baur W, Fabbri A, Rosano G, Mendelsohn ME, Jaffe IZ. Functional mineralocorticoid receptors in human vascular endothelial cells regulate intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression and promote leukocyte adhesion. Circ Res. 2008; 108: 1357–1367.

35. Goede V, Brogelli L, Ziche M, Augustin HG. Induction of inflammatory angiogenesis by monocyte chemoattractant protein-1. Int J Cancer. 1999; 82: 765–770.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Griendling KK. NADPH oxidases: new regulators of old functions. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006; 8: 1443–1445.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Mittal M, Roth M, Konig P, Hofmann S, Dony E, Goyal P, Selbitz AC, Schermuly RT, Ghofrani HA, Kwapiszewska G, Kummer W, Klepetko W, Hoda MA, Fink L, Hanze J, Seeger W, Grimminger F, Schmidt HH, Weissmann N. Hypoxia-dependent regulation of nonphagocytic NADPH oxidase subunit NOX4 in the pulmonary vasculature. Circ Res. 2007; 101: 258–267.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Stas S, Whaley-Connell A, Habibi J, Appesh L, Hayden MR, Karuparthi PR, Qazi M, Morris EM, Cooper SA, Link CD, Stump C, Hay M, Ferrario C, Sowers JR. Mineralocorticoid receptor blockade attenuates chronic overexpression of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system stimulation of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase and cardiac remodeling. Endocrinology. 2007; 148: 3773–3780.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Golestaneh N, Picaud S, Mirshahi M. The mineralocorticoid receptor in rodent retina: ontogeny and molecular identity. Mol Vis. 2002; 8: 221–225.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Odermatt A, Arnold P, Frey FJ. The intracellular localization of the mineralocorticoid receptor is regulated by 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 28484–28492.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Rogacz S, Williams GH, Hollenberg NK. Time course of enhanced adrenal responsiveness to angiotensin on a low salt diet. Hypertension. 1990; 15: 376–380.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Marney AM, Brown NJ. Aldosterone and end-organ damage. Clin Sci (Lond). 2007; 113: 267–278.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Related Article:

A New Look at the Eye: Aldosterone and Mineralocorticoid Receptors As Novel Targets in Retinal Vasculopathy
Rhian M. Touyz and Glaucia E. Callera
Circ. Res. 2009 104: 9-11. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
R. M. Touyz and G. E. Callera
A New Look at the Eye: Aldosterone and Mineralocorticoid Receptors As Novel Targets in Retinal Vasculopathy
Circ. Res., January 2, 2009; 104(1): 9 - 11.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/1/124    most recent
CIRCRESAHA.108.176008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson-Berka, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilkinson-Berka, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, A. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Angiogenesis
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Other Vascular biology
Right arrowRelated Article