Integrative Physiology |
From the Department of Cell and Molecular Physiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Correspondence to James E. Faber, PhD, Department of Cell and Molecular Physiology, 111 Mason Farm Rd, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7545. E-mail jefaber{at}med.unc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: arteriogenesis angiogenesis cerebral circulation cerebral infarction vascular development
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Collateral enlargement in ischemia requires proliferation of endothelial and mural cells, leukocyte recruitment, and remodeling of extracellular matrix. Evidence suggests vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) participates in these processes.4 However, trials testing whether exogenous VEGF can augment collateral enlargement have met with mixed results.1 The multiple VEGF isoforms, receptors, and intracellular pathways, plus the inaccessibility of the collateral circulation, make it difficult to determine a direct effect on collateral remodeling. Most studies have administered a single VEGF isoform with limited control of concentration, leading to defective neovascularization, tissue edema and impaired vessel growth.5 Recent studies have shown that multiple gradient-forming isoforms are expressed within narrow concentration windows that, if exceeded too greatly in either direction, lead to aberrant vessel formation, embryonic lethality or disturbed vessel maintenance and growth in the adult.6–10 Interestingly, Yu et al and Xie et al have shown that administration of an engineered zinc finger transcription factor that drives expression of multiple VEGF isoforms improved recovery of limb perfusion following femoral artery ligation.11,12
Studies by Jacobi et al, Lloyd et al, and Toyota et al using VEGF antagonists given systemically suggest that endogenous VEGF may contribute to ischemic collateral remodeling.13–15 However, no study has examined this question with a genetic approach or identified the responsible VEGF receptor type. VEGF acts primarily through VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-1 (flt-1) and VEGFR-2 (flk-1/KDR). VEGF-induced angiogenesis is mediated predominantly by VEGFR-2. Experiments in adult mice using VEGFR-1 specific agonists, placental growth factor and VEGF-B, and targeted mice lacking the kinase domain of VEGFR-1 demonstrate a positive role for VEGFR-1.16,17 However, during embryonic development, alternately transcribed soluble VEGFR-1 (sFlt-1) participates as a negative regulator of VEGF signaling.4,18 In this study, we examined the effect of targeted over- and underexpression of VEGF, VEGFR-1, and VEGFR-2 on collateral remodeling in ischemia.
It is not known when the native collateral circulation develops or what pathways specify formation of these rare arteriole-to-arteriole anastomoses that interconnect adjacent arterial trees. We previously found that compared to C57BL/6 mice, the BALB/c strain is markedly deficient in collateral density, and identified an expression quantitative trait locus at or near Vegfa that positively correlated with low VEGF expression at the BALB/c allele.19 Thus, in the present study, we tested the hypothesis that VEGF expression is a determinant of collateral formation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
To investigate mechanisms underlying the perfusion differences, we measured capillary density in gastrocnemius. Whereas capillary-to-muscle fiber number ratios at baseline were comparable among groups, ratios significantly increased at day 21 in VEGFR-2+/– and trended similarly in VEGFR-1+/– mice. (Figure 2a, 2d, and 2g). The increase in VEGFR-2+/– was associated with slightly greater capillary density and muscle atrophy (supplemental Figure Ib and If). Capillary density and muscle atrophy were not different in VEGFR-1+/– (Figure Ia and Ie in the online data supplement). We next examined collateral diameters in the anterior and posterior gracilis muscles and perfusion in the superficial adductor region containing these collaterals. Lumen diameter was not different at baseline. However, outward remodeling at day 21 was less in VEGFR-1+/– (P=0.07, 2-tailed) (Figure 2b, 2e, and 2h). In addition, VEGFR-1+/– had reduced adductor perfusion (supplemental Figure IId). Collateral remodeling and perfusion were not different in VEGFR-2+/– mice (Figure 2h and supplemental Figure II e). Leukocytes contribute importantly to collateral artery growth.1–3 Pericollateral CD45+ leukocytes were not different in VEGFR-2+/– but were reduced in VEGFR-1+/– mice (Figure 2c, 2f, and 2i), consistent with their attenuated collateral remodeling. In addition, circulating leukocytes, lymphocytes, and monocytes were lower 3 days after ligation in VEGFR-1+/– (supplemental Table I). These findings indicate that reduced expression of VEGFR-1 results, after femoral artery occlusion, in fewer circulating and pericollateral leukocytes, reduced collateral enlargement and flow, reduced recovery of hindlimb flow, and greater tissue ischemic injury suggesting VEGFR-1 is important in collateral remodeling.
|
The VEGF Hypermorphic Allele Augments, and Hypomorphic Allele Attenuates, Recovery After Femoral Ligation
Nagy and colleagues have constructed unique VEGF-A lacZ reporter mice with hypermorphic or hypomorphic VEGF-A alleles.8,9,22 Homozygosity of either allele results in embryonic lethality. However, VEGFhi/+ and VEGFlo/+ are viable and appear normal despite expressing VEGF at intermediate levels to homozygous and wild-type counterparts.8,9 Because data are lacking, we assessed expression of the VEGF isoforms, VEGF120, VEGF164, and VEGF188 by quantitative RT-PCR in calf and collateral zone adductor muscles.
Baseline VEGF expression in calf from the nonligated leg was 2-fold higher in VEGFhi/+ and 25% to 75% lower in VEGFlo/+ compared to wild type (supplemental Figure IIIa). Thirty-six hours after femoral ligation, expression in calf increased in all 3 strains for VEGF120 (Figure 3a through 3c). In contrast, expression in the adductor of the ligated leg, which does not experience detectable ischemia in this model,23 showed upregulation of the high-molecular-weight isoforms, VEGF-164 and -188, in wild-type and VEGFhi/+ mice (Figure 3d and 3e). Interestingly, all VEGF isoforms decreased in the VEGFlo/+ mice (Figure 3f).
|
To determine involvement of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) signaling in this unique pattern of upregulation in the adductor collateral zone, we performed quantitative RT-PCR for Hif-1
, Hif-1β, and Hif-2
. Whereas expression was similar in all strains in the adductor of the nonligated leg (supplemental Figure IIIb), Hif-1
increased 2-fold, whereas Hif-1β was unaffected in the ligated leg (Figure 3g through 3i). Interestingly, Hif-2
decreased, suggesting an alternative role for this subunit. These data suggest that ischemia in calf promotes alternative splicing of VEGF favoring the soluble isoforms, whereas shear-induced collateral remodeling in adductor is associated with expression of matrix-bound isoforms.
Compared to wild-type mice, VEGFhi/+ exhibited less (Figure 4a), whereas VEGFlo/+ experienced greater (Figure 4b), ischemic appearance scores after femoral ligation. Likewise, VEGFhi/+ mice exhibited less reduction in perfusion immediately after ligation and better recovery thereafter (Figure 4c, 4e, and 4f), whereas VEGFlo/+ experienced greater reduction and worse recovery (Figure 4d through 4f); however, only the indicated time points differed significantly by Bonferroni tests. The milder ischemia in VEGFhi/+ is consistent with their trend toward a smaller increase in VEGF120 in the calf, compared to wild type (Figure 3b). The slight reduction of VEGF120 in VEGFlo/+, compared to wild type, and the decrease of VEGF164 (Figure 3c) may reflect the reduced stability of VEGF transcripts in the VEGFlo/+ strain.9
|
Because differences in arterial pressure could cause differences in Doppler perfusion measurements, we measured arterial pressure under the same conditions of anesthesia used for Doppler imaging. Mean arterial pressure did not differ in VEGFhi/+ versus VEGFlo/+ (Figure 4g). Moreover, because VEGF is a vasodilator, increased VEGF in VEGFhi/+ (versus decreased VEGF in VEGFlo/+) favors lower (versus higher) arterial pressure and less (versus more) perfusion immediately after ligation (and thereafter), which is the opposite of what we observed (Figure 4c and 4d).
Measurement of plantar perfusion immediately after ligation largely reflects anatomic differences in preexisting collateral density and/or diameter and, to a lesser extent, capillary density, because vascular tone is strongly inhibited in the ischemic limb.25 Thereafter, recovery of perfusion is primarily determined by collateral remodeling, with a smaller contribution of angiogenesis. To distinguish the potential effect of VEGF on these determinants, we first examined capillary-to-muscle fiber ratio in gastrocnemius at baseline (Figure 5a and 5b). There was no difference between wild-type and VEGFhi/+ or VEGFlo/+ mice, suggesting that differences in collateral number and/or diameter underlie the differences in perfusion immediately after ligation. Capillary-to-fiber ratio increased at day 21 in VEGFhi/+. Interestingly, baseline fiber size was greater in VEGFhi/+, consistent with the role of VEGF in skeletal muscle development (supplemental Figure Ic and Ig).26 Capillary-to-fiber ratio decreased at day 21 in VEGFlo/+ mice. Although capillary number-per-tissue-area of VEGFlo/+ did not differ from wild type, greater atrophy occurred (supplemental Figure Id and Ih), resulting in reduced capillary-to-muscle fiber ratio.
|
Given the importance of collateral conductance following femoral ligation, we determined collateral diameter at baseline and at 21 days postligation. Lumen diameters in VEGFhi/+ mice were significantly smaller than wild type at both time points; however, percentage remodeling and adductor perfusion in VEGFhi/+ were not different (Figure 5c and supplemental Figure IIf). In contrast, baseline diameters in VEGFlo/+ mice did not differ from wild type; however, remodeling and adductor perfusion were reduced (Figure 5d and supplemental Figure II g). The baseline diameter data suggest (because baseline capillarity do not differ) that differences in collateral density may underlie the differences in perfusion immediately after ligation, ie, greater number of smaller diameter collaterals in VEGFhi/+, versus fewer in VEGFlo/+. In addition, less remodeling in VEGFlo/+ mice suggests VEGF contributes to collateral remodeling.
Immunofluorescence was performed against β-galactosidase in adductor sections of VEGFhi/+ mice to localize VEGF expression (Figure 5e). Low-level basal expression of VEGF was evident in skeletal muscle surrounding noncollateral arterioles and unremodeled collaterals (Figure 5e, left and middle images), consistent with data from Maharaj et al describing VEGF expression pattern in these mice.24 However, 7 days after ligation, VEGF expression increased in pericollateral skeletal muscle (Figure 5e, right). Costaining with CD45 revealed a small population of recruited leukocytes that also expressed VEGF (Figure 5e, right, and supplemental Figure IV).
VEGF Genotype Determines the Number of Preexisting Collaterals
To determine whether VEGF expression influences native collateral density, as suggested by the above findings, we performed x-ray arteriography immediately and 7 days after ligation (the latter to improve detection of smaller collaterals after onset of remodeling). Analogous to Rentrop analysis, we counted vessels crossing a line drawn through the middle of the adductor collateral zone (Figure 6a); this method agrees with other methods of quantifying preexisting collateral capacity in the hindlimb.19 An apparent VEGF gene–dose relationship was detected, wherein VEGFhi/+ had more and VEGFlo/+ had fewer collaterals than wild-type mice (Figure 6b).
|
We next sought to determine whether collaterals are present at birth and whether VEGF expression correlates with newborn and adult density in another tissue besides skeletal muscle. We recently reported that differences in collateral density among mouse strains exist across multiple tissues.19 This includes collaterals of the cerebral cortical circulation, which are confined to the pial (leptomeningeal) membrane and thus readily quantified.19 We therefore counted pial collaterals in VEGFhi/+, VEGFlo/+, and wild-type mice using a polyurethane casting agent (Figure 6c; resolution of x-ray and polyurethane arteriography given in the online data supplement).27 Interestingly, collaterals were present at birth (P1) (Figure 6d). As in the hindlimb (Figure 6b), an apparent VEGF gene–dose relationship was detected at P1, P21, and 3 months of age, with VEGFhi/+ mice having more and VEGFlo/+ having fewer collaterals (Figure 6c and 6d). Wild-type and VEGFhi/+ mice were born with the same number of collaterals, whereas VEGFlo/+ were born with fewer, suggesting VEGF levels specify the density of nascent collaterals formed during embryogenesis. In VEGFhi/+, pial collateral number remained constant throughout postnatal development. In contrast, wild-type mice experienced a decline in collateral density by P21 that remained unchanged in adults. VEGFlo/+ mice also lost collaterals with age.
To determine whether an increase in collateral density offered protection, we performed middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in wild-type, VEGFlo/+, and VEGFhi/+ mice. Twenty-four hours after MCAO, a relationship between VEGF genotype and infarct volume was evident (Figure 6e and 6f), with VEGFhi/+ mice having
2-fold smaller infarcts. Furthermore, infarct volume negatively correlated with collateral number (Figure 6g). These data suggest that collaterals form during the perinatal period; that VEGF is important in their formation, postnatal maturation, and establishment of the adult collateral density; and that the latter may be an important determinant of the severity of stroke.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Few studies have addressed whether endogenous VEGF mediates collateral growth. Supportive evidence exists in hindlimb13,14 and heart15 ligation models, where systemic administration of sFlt1/sFlk1 adenovirus,13 VEGF receptor inhibitor,14 or neutralizing antibody15 impaired recovery of perfusion and angiographic collateral growth. Also, Matsunaga, Chilian, and colleagues have shown that inhibition of endothelial nitric oxide synthase with L-NAME (NG-L-arginine methyl ester), which also interferes with VEGF signaling, reduced ischemic coronary collateral growth but did not affect angiogenesis.28 Our findings that VEGFR-1+/– mice show reduced recovery of plantar and adductor perfusion, greater ischemia, reduced pericollateral leukocyte, and reduced collateral enlargement, but normal angiogenesis, suggest that VEGF acting through VEGFR-1 mediates collateral remodeling. This is in contrast to the role of VEGFR-1 as a VEGF inhibitor during development.4,18 It is difficult to measure VEGFR-1 signaling because of its weak kinase activity.17 However, studies using the VEGFR-1–specific agonists, placenta growth factor and VEGF-B, and kinase-dead mutants find that VEGFR-1 possesses signaling functions in the adult.4,18 Our data add collateral growth to these functions. They also agree with evidence by Pipp et al that mice lacking placenta growth factor have impaired recovery from hindlimb ischemia.16 In addition, our findings of fewer leukocytes circulating and residing around remodeling collaterals, which suggest reduced leukocyte mobilization and transmigration, are consistent with their known role in arteriogenesis.16 These results are congruent with the expression of VEGFR-1 on leukocytes18 and its proposed role in the bone marrow niche,29 in homing,30 and chemotaxis.31 No deficits were evident in VEGFR-2+/– mice. However, given the strong kinase activity of VEGFR-2, a single allele may specify sufficient receptors to mediate VEGFR-2–dependent ischemic angiogenesis, as well as any potential contribution of this receptor to arteriogenesis. This could explain why angiogenesis in the ischemic gastrocnemius was not impaired in VEGFR-2+/–. Conditional deletion of VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-1 will be required to confirm that VEGFR-2 does not participate in collateral growth and to determine whether the modest inhibition we observed in the VEGFR-1+/– reflects only partial reduction in receptor density.
Native collaterals are small in diameter and few in number. In addition, current antibodies cannot distinguish among VEGF isoforms and have limited resolution to detect secreted ligand. Thus, it is not known whether VEGF isoforms increase around remodeling collaterals to contribute arteriogenesis. Deindl et al23 did not detect increased VEGF in rabbit collaterals or in whole quadricep muscle 3 days after femoral ligation. In contrast, we found that mRNAs for high-molecular-weight isoforms of VEGF increased in the adductor collateral zone of wild-type mice 36 hours after ligation. Because VEGF transcripts agree with protein expression,32 this discrepancy may be attributable to differences in duration of ligation, tissue analyzed, or species studied. We assayed a 5-mm-wide midsection of the adductor that contains hindlimb collaterals, including those in the gracilis muscles that we measured histologically. In contrast to the adductor, only VEGF120 was upregulated in the gastrocnemius. This differential expression where collaterals are remodeling versus where capillaries are sprouting, is consistent with the different physical properties and functions of VEGF isoforms. In the calf, free diffusion of VEGF120 would promote a wide area of angiogenesis. In addition, Hattori et al have shown that VEGF120 released into the circulation from ischemic tissue aids mobilization of leukocytes from bone marrow.29 In contrast, collateral growth in the thigh is presumed to require temporal and spatial release of proteases, cytokines, and growth factors. Elaboration of the heparin-binding VEGF164 and VEGF188 isoforms around collaterals may establish VEGF gradients that stimulate diapedesis and proliferation of leukocytes, proliferation of endothelial cells, and migration of smooth muscle cells. Consistent with this hypothesis, immunofluorescence revealed VEGF upregulated in pericollateral skeletal muscle and leukocytes in addition to collateral endothelium and smooth muscle. It will be important in future studies to determine the cell source(s), stimulus for VEGF release, and isoform expression profile.
Deindl et al23 also did not detect increased Hif-1
in the adductor, although differences in species, time after ligation, and tissue sampled could be important. In contrast, we found an
2-fold increase in Hif-1
mRNA (and no increase in Hif-1β) in the adductor collateral zone. Jiang, Semenza, and colleagues have shown that Hif-1
levels are regulated by tissue oxygen over a broad range.33 Thus, oxygen may decline sufficiently, although not to ischemic levels, to increase transcription and stabilization of Hif-1
transcripts. In addition, it is possible that other factors surrounding remodeling collaterals that regulate Hif-1
, such as reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, growth factors, and increased shear stress itself34 may contribute to the increase in Hif-1
.
Consistent with deficient recovery of flow after femoral ligation in VEGFR-1+/– mice, a direct relationship was evident between VEGF genotype and recovery among VEGFlo/+, wild-type, and VEGFhi/+ mice. Similar to VEGFR-1+/–, VEGFlo/+ had worse ischemic appearance scores and blunted recovery of plantar perfusion compared to wild type. In addition, capillary-to-muscle fiber number decreased by day 21 in VEGFlo/+ as a result of greater muscle atrophy. In contrast, VEGFhi/+ mice showed enhanced recovery of perfusion and little ischemia. The role of VEGF in the development and maintenance of striated muscle fiber size, as demonstrated by Bryan, D'Amore, and colleagues,26 could contribute to the differences in atrophy and appearance scores. The variation in capillary-to-fiber ratio at day 21 that we observed in the hypomorphs, which is consistent with the role of VEGF in ischemic angiogenesis, could also contribute to the differences in recovery of hindlimb perfusion and ischemic scores, although collateral remodeling is the primary determinant of recovery of hindlimb perfusion.
VEGFlo/+ mice exhibited attenuated adductor perfusion and impaired collateral remodeling like that seen in the VEGFR-1+/– mice. In contrast, collateral remodeling and adductor perfusion were not enhanced in VEGFhi/+. Although this appears discordant, several considerations are important. Immediately after ligation, perfusion decreased more in VEGFlo/+ and less in VEGFhi/+. The increase in shear stress in collaterals immediately after ligation favors inhibition of collateral smooth muscle tone. Moreover, studies by Yang, Laughlin, and Terjung have documented that ischemia and low pressure cause myogenic and metabolic inhibition of tone in the vasculature below the point of ligation.25 These considerations suggest that the differences in perfusion immediately after ligation arise from anatomic differences in preexisting collateral number, collateral lumen size, and/or, to a lesser degree, capillary density. Baseline capillary density was not different among VEGFhi/+, VEGFlo/+, and wild type, and collateral lumen diameter was comparable in the latter 2 groups, whereas it was smaller in VEGFhi/+ mice. Collectively, these data suggest that density of native collaterals varies directly with level of VEGF expression. In VEGFhi/+ mice, a greater number of collaterals in parallel favors lower flow in individual collaterals and thus smaller baseline diameters, which is what we observed. Shear stress is the proximate stimulus of arteriogenesis.1,2 A greater number of collaterals favors less increase in shear in individual collaterals, which is consistent with our finding that remodeling was not greater in VEGFhi/+ mice than in wild type despite increased VEGF expression. In VEGFlo/+ mice with fewer collaterals, the expected higher shear forces may not be able to overcome the deficit in VEGF expression. This could explain the reduced collateral remodeling and impaired perfusion that we observed.
We found that VEGF expression determines collateral density in a second tissue: the pial circulation. An additional intriguing finding was that VEGFlo/+ mice were born with fewer pial collaterals compared to wild type and VEGFhi/+. These data suggest VEGF levels contribute to collateral formation in the embryo. We previously hypothesized that collaterals form during arterial tree formation and that reduced VEGF results in reduced collateral formation.19 Studies by the laboratories of Bautch, Shima, and Tomanek have shown that VEGF is important in branching morphogenesis,35–37 including formation of coronary artery stems by VEGF-B, which activates VEGFR-1.37 Our data support the concept that collateral density and vascular branching are intimately related. In addition, collateral density was reduced by postnatal day 21 in wild-type and VEGFlo/+ mice, whereas density was maintained in VEGFhi/+. This is consistent with the role of VEGF in stabilizing nascent blood vessels.4,5,18
We reported that native collateral density and VEGF expression differ strongly in 2 mouse strains.19 Inducible VEGF expression and collateral density in hindlimb, cerebral cortex, and intestine were high in C57BL/6 mice and low in BALB/c. This association led us to hypothesize that VEGF is a determinant of native collateral formation. Our present studies using mice with a single targeted genetic difference, ie, altered VEGF expression,8,9,22 provide strong support for this hypothesis. We also suggest that genetic polymorphisms and environmental factors that reduce VEGF during embryonic or perinatal periods could reduce collateral formation, resulting in increased severity of stroke, myocardial infarction, and peripheral artery disease. How VEGF affects collateral formation and stabilization are intriguing questions for future study. Our data suggest that murine pial collaterals form before birth and mature within a narrow 3-week period. In the embryo, early vascular patterning involves genetically determined events and morphogenic factors including VEGF, whereas during later stages when flow becomes important, excess vessels are thought to be pruned, leaving "hemodynamically favored" channels. It is possible that the role of VEGF in collateral formation involves its known role in vascular patterning and/or hemodynamic patterns produced by local vasodilator actions of VEGF.
Other molecules in the VEGF signaling pathway may also contribute to collateral formation. Resar et al recently identified a HIF-1
polymorphism that correlated with the presence of coronary collaterals in patients.38 The polymorphism results in an amino acid substitution that confers increased HIF-1 activity. However, patients with the substituted allele did not have visible collaterals, which is at variance with our findings. Among mechanisms proposed by the authors to explain the apparent discrepancy between higher HIF-1 activity and lack of visible collaterals,38 we propose an additional hypothesis. Because clinical angiography only detects large vessels, collaterals in a person with a small native density would be more likely to experience larger increases in shear and thus enlarge to detectable diameters during progression of coronary artery disease. In contrast, collaterals in a person with high density would be expected to experience smaller increases in shear, resulting in less outward remodeling during disease progression and absence of angiographic detection.
In conclusion, our results suggest that VEGFR-1 mediates collateral growth in ischemic disease by mobilizing leukocytes and recruiting them to the pericollateral space. In addition, we show that collaterals form before birth and stabilize at their adult density by the third postnatal week. Lastly, we identify VEGF as the first molecule specifying preexisting collateral density in normal tissue. We propose a model whereby collaterals form in a VEGF-dependent manner during embryogenesis. Further, these nascent collaterals require adequate VEGF during a critical period after birth to stabilize and mature sufficiently to achieve their full adult density. Further studies will be required to define when and how VEGF and other molecules contribute to collateral formation, as well as the downstream effectors that stabilize and maintain collaterals in tissues. An interesting recent study by Wustmann, Seiler, and colleagues reported that coronary collateral flow in healthy patients varies widely.39 Moreover, several VEGF polymorphisms linked to altered expression have been described.40 Thus, it will be important to examine whether polymorphisms affecting the expression of VEGF and other genes are associated with altered collateral density. An understanding of pathways that specify collateral formation in normal tissues may lead to therapies to induce formation of new collaterals in patients with ischemic disease.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
Supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/NIH grants HL62584 (to J.E.F.), T32-HL069768 (to J.A.C.), and F32-HL080847 (to D.C.).
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Heil M, Eitenmuller I, Schmitz-Rixen T, Schaper W. Arteriogenesis versus angiogenesis: similarities and differences. J Cell Mol Med. 2006; 10: 45–55.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Sherman JA, Hall A, Malenka DJ, De Muinck ED, Simons M. Humoral and cellular factors responsible for coronary collateral formation. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 98: 1194–1197.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Ferrara N, Gerber HP, LeCouter J. The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med. 2003; 9: 669–676.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. von Degenfeld G, Banfi A, Springer ML, Wagner RA, Jacobi J, Ozawa CR, Merchant MJ, Cooke JP, Blau HM. Microenvironmental VEGF distribution is critical for stable and functional vessel growth in ischemia. FASEB J. 2006; 20: 2657–2659.
6. Carmeliet P, Ferreira V, Breier G, Pollefeyt S, Kieckens L, Gertsenstein M, Fahrig M, Vandenhoeck A, Harpal K, Eberhardt C, Declercq C, Pawling J, Moons L, Collen D, Risau W, Nagy A. Abnormal blood vessel development and lethality in embryos lacking a single VEGF allele. Nature. 1996; 380: 435–439.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Ferrara N, Carver-Moore K, Chen H, Dowd M, Lu L, O'Shea KS, Powell-Braxton L, Hillan KJ, Moore MW. Heterozygous embryonic lethality induced by targeted inactivation of the VEGF gene. Nature. 1996; 380: 439–442.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Miquerol L, Langille BL, Nagy A. Embryonic development is disrupted by modest increases in vascular endothelial growth factor gene expression. Development. 2000; 127: 3941–3946.[Abstract]
9. Damert A, Miquerol L, Gertsenstein M, Risau W, Nagy A. Insufficient VEGFA activity in yolk sac endoderm compromises haematopoietic and endothelial differentiation. Development. 2002; 129: 1881–1892.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Haigh JJ, Morelli PI, Gerhardt H, Haigh K, Tsien J, Damert A, Miquerol L, Muhlner U, Klein R, Ferrara N, Wagner EF, Betsholtz C, Nagy A. Cortical and retinal defects caused by dosage-dependent reductions in VEGF-A paracrine signaling. Dev Biol. 2003; 262: 225–241.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Yu J, Lei L, Liang Y, Hinh L, Hickey RP, Huang Y, Liu D, Yeh JL, Rebar E, Case C, Spratt K, Sessa WC, Giordano FJ. An engineered VEGF-activating zinc finger protein transcription factor improves blood flow and limb salvage in advanced-age mice. FASEB J. 2006; 20: 479–481.
12. Xie D, Li Y, Reed EA, Odronic SI, Kontos CD, Annex BH. An engineered vascular endothelial growth factor-activating transcription factor induces therapeutic angiogenesis in ApoE knockout mice with hindlimb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2006; 44: 166–175.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Jacobi J, Tam BY, Wu G, Hoffman J, Cooke JP, Kuo CJ. Adenoviral gene transfer with soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptors impairs angiogenesis and perfusion in a murine model of hindlimb ischemia. Circulation. 2004; 110: 2424–2429.
14. Lloyd PG, Prior BM, Li H, Yang HT, Terjung RL. VEGF receptor antagonism blocks arteriogenesis, but only partially inhibits angiogenesis, in skeletal muscle of exercise-trained rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005; 288: H759–H768.
15. Toyota E, Warltier DC, Brock T, Ritman E, Kolz C, O'Malley P, Rocic P, Focardi M, Chilian WM. Vascular endothelial growth factor is required for coronary collateral growth in the rat. Circulation. 2005; 112: 2108–2113.
16. Pipp F, Heil M, Issbrucker K, Ziegelhoeffer T, Martin S, van den Heuvel J, Weich H, Fernandez B, Golomb G, Carmeliet P, Schaper W, Clauss M. VEGFR-1-selective VEGF homologue PlGF is arteriogenic: evidence for a monocyte-mediated mechanism. Circ Res. 2003; 92: 378–385.
17. Hiratsuka S, Maru Y, Okada A, Seiki M, Noda T, Shibuya M. Involvement of Flt-1 tyrosine kinase (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1) in pathological angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2001; 61: 1207–1213.
18. Cross MJ, Dixelius J, Matsumoto T, Claesson-Welsh L. VEGF-receptor signal transduction. Trends Biochem Sci. 2003; 28: 488–494.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Chalothorn D, Clayton JA, Zhang H, Pomp D, Faber JE. Collateral density, remodeling, and VEGF-A expression differ widely between mouse strains. Physiol Genomics. 2007; 30: 179–191.
20. Thirunavukkarasu M, Addya S, Juhasz B, Pant R, Zhan L, Surrey S, Maulik G, Menon VP, Maulik N. Heterozygous disruption of Flk-1 receptor leads To myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury in mice: application of Affymetrix gene chip analysis. J Cell Mol Med. 2008; 12: 1284–1302.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Chalothorn D, Zhang H, Clayton JA, Thomas SA, Faber JE. Catecholamines augment collateral vessel growth and angiogenesis in hindlimb ischemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005; 289: H947–H959.
22. Miquerol L, Gertsenstein M, Harpal K, Rossant J, Nagy A. Multiple developmental roles of VEGF suggested by a LacZ-tagged allele. Dev Biol. 1999; 212: 307–322.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Deindl E, Buschmann I, Hoefer IE, Podzuweit T, Boengler K, Vogel S, van Royen N, Fernandez B, Schaper W. Role of ischemia and of hypoxia-inducible genes in arteriogenesis after femoral artery occlusion in the rabbit. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 779–786.
24. Maharaj AS, Saint-Geniez M, Maldonado AE, D'Amore PA. Vascular endothelial growth factor localization in the adult. Am J Pathol. 2006; 168: 639–648.
25. Yang HT, Laughlin MH, Terjung RL. Prior exercise training increases collateral-dependent blood flow in rats after acute femoral artery occlusion. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000; 279: H1890–HH1897.
26. Bryan BA, Walshe TE, Mitchell DC, Havumaki JS, Saint-Geniez M, Maharaj AS, Maldonado AE, D'Amore PA. Coordinated vascular endothelial growth factor expression and signaling during skeletal myogenic differentiation. Mol Biol Cell. 2008; 19: 994–1006.
27. Krucker T, Lang A, Meyer EP. New polyurethane-based material for vascular corrosion casting with improved physical and imaging characteristics. Microsc Res Tech. 2006; 69: 138–147.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Matsunaga T, Warltier DC, Weihrauch DW, Moniz M, Tessmer J, Chilian WM. Ischemia-induced coronary collateral growth is dependent on vascular endothelial growth factor and nitric oxide. Circulation. 2000; 102: 3098–3103.
29. Hattori K, Heissig B, Wu Y, Dias S, Tejada R, Ferris B, Hicklin DJ, Zhu Z, Bohlen P, Witte L, Hendrikx J, Hackett NR, Crystal RG, Moore MA, Werb Z, Lyden D, Rafii S. Placental growth factor reconstitutes hematopoiesis by recruiting VEGFR1(+) stem cells from bone-marrow microenvironment. Nat Med. 2002; 8: 841–849.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Kaplan RN, Riba RD, Zacharoulis S, Bramley AH, Vincent L, Costa C, MacDonald DD, Jin DK, Shido K, Kerns SA, Zhu Z, Hicklin D, Wu Y, Port JL, Altorki N, Port ER, Ruggero D, Shmelkov SV, Jensen KK, Rafii S, Lyden D. VEGFR1-positive haematopoietic bone marrow progenitors initiate the pre-metastatic niche. Nature. 2005; 438: 820–827.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Tchaikovski V, Fellbrich G, Waltenberger J. The molecular basis of VEGFR-1 signal transduction pathways in primary human monocytes. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008; 28: 322–328.
32. Yuan A, Yu CJ, Chen WJ, Lin FY, Kuo SH, Luh KT, Yang PC. Correlation of total VEGF mRNA and protein expression with histologic type, tumor angiogenesis, patient survival and timing of relapse in non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer. 2000; 89: 475–483.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Jiang BH, Semenza GL, Bauer C, Marti HH. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 levels vary exponentially over a physiologically relevant range of O2 tension. Am J Physiol. 1996; 271: C1172–C1180.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Chun YS, Kim MS, Park JW. Oxygen-dependent and -independent regulation of HIF-1alpha. J Korean Med Sci. 2002; 17: 581–588.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Kearney JB, Kappas NC, Ellerstrom C, DiPaola FW, Bautch VL. The VEGF receptor flt-1 (VEGFR-1) is a positive modulator of vascular sprout formation and branching morphogenesis. Blood. 2004; 103: 4527–4535.
36. Ruhrberg C, Gerhardt H, Golding M, Watson R, Ioannidou S, Fujisawa H, Betsholtz C, Shima DT. Spatially restricted patterning cues provided by heparin-binding VEGF-A control blood vessel branching morphogenesis. Genes Dev. 2002; 16: 2684–2698.
37. Tomanek RJ, Ishii Y, Holifield JS, Sjogren CL, Hansen HK, Mikawa T. VEGF family members regulate myocardial tubulogenesis and coronary artery formation in the embryo. Circ Res. 2006; 98: 947–953.
38. Resar JR, Roguin A, Voner J, Nasir K, Hennebry TA, Miller JM, Ingersoll R, Kasch LM, Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha polymorphism and coronary collaterals in patients with ischemic heart disease. Chest. 2005; 128: 787–791.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Wustmann K, Zbinden S, Windecker S, Meier B, Seiler C. Is there functional collateral flow during vascular occlusion in angiographically normal coronary arteries? Circulation. 2003; 107: 2213–2220.
40. Balasubramanian SP, Brown NJ, Reed MW. Role of genetic polymorphisms in tumour angiogenesis. Br J Cancer. 2002; 87: 1057–1065.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
Related Article:
Circ. Res. 2008 103: 905-906.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Waltenberger Limits to Growth of Native Collateral Vessels: Just One Mouse CLIC Away From Unlimited Collateral Perfusion? Circ. Res., July 2, 2009; 105(1): 9 - 11. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Chalothorn, H. Zhang, J. E. Smith, J. C. Edwards, and J. E. Faber Chloride Intracellular Channel-4 Is a Determinant of Native Collateral Formation in Skeletal Muscle and Brain Circ. Res., July 2, 2009; 105(1): 89 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Chilian and Y. F. Pung Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and the Collateral Circulation: The Story Continues Circ. Res., October 24, 2008; 103(9): 905 - 906. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |