Published online before print July 31, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.175133
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Molecular Medicine |
Nitroglycerin-Induced S-nitrosylation and Desensitization of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase Contribute to Nitrate Tolerance
From the Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark.
Correspondence to Annie Beuve, Department of Pharmacology and Physiology–MSB I655, New Jersey Medical School, UMDNJ, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07101-1709. E-mail annie.beuve{at}umdnj.edu
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Nitrates such as nitroglycerin (GTN) and nitric oxide donors such as S-nitrosothiols are clinically vasoactive through stimulation of soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC), which produces the second messenger cGMP. Development of nitrate tolerance, after exposure to GTN for several hours, is a major drawback to a widely used cardiovascular therapy. We recently showed that exposure to nitric oxide and to S-nitrosothiols causes S-nitrosylation of sGC, which directly desensitizes sGC to stimulation by nitric oxide. We tested the hypothesis that desensitization of sGC by S-nitrosylation is a mechanism of nitrate tolerance. Our results established that vascular tolerance to nitrates can be recapitulated in vivo by S-nitrosylation through exposure to cell membrane-permeable S-nitrosothiols and that sGC is S-nitrosylated and desensitized in the tolerant, treated tissues. We next determined that (1) GTN treatment of primary aortic smooth muscle cells induces S-nitrosylation of sGC and its desensitization as a function of GTN concentration; (2) S-nitrosylation and desensitization are prevented by treatment with N-acetyl-cysteine, a precursor of glutathione, used clinically to prevent development of nitrate tolerance; and (3) S-nitrosylation and desensitization are reversed by cessation of GTN treatment. Finally, we demonstrated that in vivo development of nitrate tolerance and crosstolerance by 3-day chronic GTN treatment correlates with S-nitrosylation and desensitization of sGC in tolerant tissues. These results suggest that in vivo nitrate tolerance is mediated, in part, by desensitization of sGC through GTN-dependent S-nitrosylation.
Key Words: cGMP • nitric oxide • nitrosation • S-nitrosothiols • vascular tolerance
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Since the 19th century, nitroglycerin (glyceryl trinitrate [GTN]) has been used in clinical medicine to treat angina pectoris and, more recently, congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, and other cardiovascular diseases.1 It is used because of its excellent therapeutic profile, although it induces nitrate tolerance. Nitrate tolerance is defined as the attenuation or loss of vascular responsiveness to nitrate (eg, GTN) after continuous exposure to GTN or other organic nitrates.2 Crosstolerance corresponds to the lack of vascular responsiveness to nitric oxide (NO) and NO donors (eg, nitrosothiols) and is characterized by an increase in reactive oxygen species.3 NO and nitrates exert their vasorelaxing effects through stimulation of soluble guanylyl cyclase (sGC), which produces cGMP.4 At the molecular level, tolerance corresponds to an absence of increased vascular cGMP production in response to NO or nitrate, highlighting the central role of sGC activity in vascular tolerance. The mechanism of development of nitrate tolerance remains a mystery; the prevalent actual model is impairment of GTN bioconversion through inhibition of mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase, thereby reducing the release of NO or its derivatives.5,6 Other frequently cited mechanisms are (1) depletion of thiols, which are thought to be required for GTN conversion to NO and its derivatives7; (2) increased phosphodiesterase activity, which breaks down cGMP8; (3) reduced NO bioavailability by affecting the endogenous NO production9; and (4) desensitization of sGC.10
Using S-nitrosothiols, we recently demonstrated that S-nitrosylation of sGC is a mechanism of desensitization to NO in primary aortic smooth muscle cells.11 Interestingly, it was shown that in vivo GTN treatment induces an increase in erythrocyte S-nitrosothiol content.12 Earlier, GTN treatment was proposed to increase intracellular concentration of S-nitrosothiols such as S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) and S-nitrosocysteine (CSNO),7,13 and, in fact, these S-nitrosothiols were thought to mediate GTN vasorelaxing effects through sGC activation. However, we now know that GSNO and CSNO are also capable of S-nitrosylation, probably through transnitrosylation.14 Together, these findings led us to hypothesize that GTN treatment could S-nitrosylate sGC, leading to its desensitization, which in turn would participate in development of nitrate tolerance. If this hypothesis is correct, then (1) inducing S-nitrosylation in vivo should mimic development of tolerance; (2) GTN treatment should induce S-nitrosylation and desensitization of sGC; and (3) crosstolerance to NO donors that bypass GTN conversion or endothelial dysfunction by acting directly on sGC should be observed. We provide evidence that desensitization of sGC through S-nitrosylation could be an additional mechanism for GTN-induced nitrate tolerance.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Materials and Reagents
Fetal bovine serum was from GIBCO (Carlsbad, Calif). All other cell culture reagents were from ATCC (Manassas, Va). Other materials are described in the "Supplemental Material and Methods." L-cysteine and CSNO solutions were prepared as previously described.11
Hamster Cheek Pouch Preparation and Arteriolar Diameter Measurements
The hamster left cheek pouch was prepared for intravital microscopy as described.15 Under acute conditions, CSNO or GTN was applied to the cheek pouch through a side port into the suffusate bicarbonate buffer line. For 3-day treatment, GTN or solvent (propylene glycol) was infused through an osmotic pump at a rate of 10 µg/min · kg. GTN or solvent was then topically applied to the cheek pouch to measure arterial vasodilation (see "Supplemental Methods"). All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the New Jersey Medical School.
Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase Activity Assay
sGC activity was determined by formation of [
-32P]cGMP from [-32P]GTP, as described.16 Forty micrograms of cell cytosol or 50 µg of tissues were used in each assay reaction.
Measurement of cGMP Production
cGMP production was measured by radioimmunoassay in the presence of 1 mmol/L IBMX16 (see "Supplemental Methods").
Immunoprecipitation With Anti-S-nitrosocysteine and Biotin Switch Assay to Detect S-nitrosylation
Immunoprecipitation is detailed in the "Supplemental Materials and Methods." Biotin switch assay was performed using the NitroGlo Kit from Perkin Elmer17 on the cytosols of cells or tissues (300 µg).11
Statistical analysis is described in the "Supplemental Material and Methods." Preparation of cytosols from tissues and cells is described in the Supplemental Material and Methods.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
S-nitrosocysteine Treatment Induces Vascular Tolerance In Vivo
To show that S-nitrosylation could induce vascular tolerance, we used the hamster cheek pouch preparation in which vasodilation of arterioles is measured by intravital microscopy in response to topical application of vasoactive agents18 (see "Supplemental Methods"). S-nitrosocysteine (CSNO) was used because it (1) induces vasorelaxation (probably through release of NO19); (2) is a S-nitrosylating agent that causes S-nitrosylation and desensitization of sGC in cells11; and (3) accumulates during GTN treatment.13 L-Cysteine (L-Cys), as control, and CSNO at 10 µmol/L were applied for 5 minutes, vasodilation was measured, and after 10 minutes washout, 10 µmol/L of the NO donor SNAP was applied for 5 minutes and vasodilation assessed. As shown in Figure 1A, following initial application of 10 µmol/L L-Cys, SNAP produced immediate vasodilation of the arteriole. Application of 10 µmol/L CSNO induced vasodilation (as expected for an NO donor), yet after return toward the baseline value, arterioles failed to vasodilate in response to SNAP (Figure 1B). This result shows that the S-nitrosothiol CSNO causes vascular tolerance in an in vivo system under acute conditions.
|
S-nitrosocysteine-Induced Tolerance Is Associated With S-nitrosylation and Desensitization of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase
After 5 minutes of 10 µmol/L CSNO or L-Cys treatment (with verification that CSNO induced vasodilation as described previously), the treated pouches and the untreated contralateral pouch (naïve control cysteine or CSNO) were collected, instead of being treated with SNAP, to determine sGC S-nitrosylation and activity. S-nitrosylation was assayed by 3 methods: immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-SNO antibodies20 (Figure 1C), the biotin switch assay followed by avidin purification,21 and IP with anti-sGC followed by biotin/avidin switch assay (Figure 1D). Western blots with anti-sGC showed that sGC was strongly S-nitrosylated in the CSNO-treated tissues that exhibited tolerance in comparison to L-Cys-treated pouches or in the contralateral pouches (Figure 1C, D). The same cytosols were assayed for sGC activity. Figure 1E showed that the basal sGC activity was similar between the L-Cys, CSNO-treated tissues and their naive controls, but the sGC in the CSNO-treated pouches lost significant sensitivity to SNAP in comparison to controls. These results indicate that the CSNO-treated pouches that exhibit tolerance, ie, lack of relaxation of their arterioles in response to NO stimulation, contain high levels of S-nitrosylated sGC and displayed a significant decrease in NO-stimulated sGC activity.
Treatment With S-nitrosoglutathione Does Not Induce Tolerance and Does Not Lead to Detectable S-nitrosylation
In vivo treatment with more commonly used S-nitrosothiols such as GSNO or SNAP does not lead to tolerance.22,23 Interestingly, we and others have observed that GSNO does not readily S-nitrosylate intact cells or tissues unlike CSNO.20,24 To investigate further the correlation between S-nitrosylation of sGC and vascular tolerance, the hamster cheek pouch was treated with GSNO under the same conditions as previously described (5 minutes, 10 µmol/L GSNO) and after washout, 10 µmol/L SNAP was applied, as in Figure 1. Figure 2A is a control showing vasorelaxation in response to SNAP. As shown in Figure 2B, GSNO application induces vasorelaxation, as expected for an NO donor, but in contrast to CSNO, there was complete vasorelaxation in response to a subsequent SNAP application indicating that GSNO did not lead to tolerance. Moreover, no S-nitrosylation could be detected in the treated tissues (Figure 2C).
|
Nitroglycerin Induces S-nitrosylation of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase and Desensitization in Primary Rat Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells in a Concentration-Dependent Manner
To determine whether GTN treatment leads to S-nitrosylation and desensitization of sGC, we exposed primary smooth muscle cell (SMC) to 100 µmol/L of GTN for 1 hour. As shown in Figure 3A, both biotin–avidin and IP show that GTN induces S-nitrosylation of sGC. No S-nitrosylated sGC could be detected when SMC was treated with methanol (vehicle). We next assayed whether GTN also induces desensitization of sGC by measuring by radioimmunoassay the cGMP produced in response to SNAP after treatment with various concentrations of GTN. Figure 3B shows that increasing concentrations of GTN (100 to 500 µmol/L) significantly decreased production of NO-stimulated cGMP by SMC. In parallel, biotin switch assay on the cytosols of GTN-treated SMC indicated that S-nitrosylated sGC levels increased with increasing concentration of GTN (Figure 3B, inset). These results provide evidence that GTN treatment leads to S-nitrosylation of endogenous sGC thiols and induces its desensitization.
|
Nitroglycerin-Induced S-nitrosylation and Desensitization of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase in Smooth Muscle Cell Are Prevented by N-acetyl-cysteine Treatment and Are Reversible
S-nitrosylation is a reversible posttranslational modification dependent on the redox state. Therefore, N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC), as a precursor of glutathione synthesis, can prevent S-nitrosylation.11,25 To confirm that GTN induces desensitization by S-nitrosylation of sGC, SMC were treated for 2 hours with 2.5 mmol/L NAC before exposure to GTN (100 µmol/L) or vehicle for 1 hour. Pretreatment with NAC not only drastically reduced the levels of S-nitrosylated sGC (Figure 4A), but also partially restored sensitivity of sGC to NO stimulation (Figure 4B). In parallel, SMC treated with 100 µmol/L GTN or vehicle were washed and incubated for 1 hour with medium only. Figure 4C shows that free-nitrate incubation reversed S-nitrosylation (Western blot with anti-sGC), which correlated with resensitization to NO (51.4% versus 5.0% desensitization without or with washout, respectively). These results showing that NAC prevents GTN-induced desensitization and S-nitrosylation of sGC together with reversion of S-nitrosylation and resensitization by GTN-free incubation support the idea that GTN-dependent changes in redox state facilitate S-nitrosylation.
|
Mutations of 1C243 and β1C122 Significantly Reduce the Desensitization Observed in the Wild-Type Treated With Nitroglycerin
We tested whether 1C243 and β1C122, whose S-nitrosylation is involved in desensitization of sGC by CSNO,11 are also responsible for GTN-dependent desensitization. COS-7 cells, which do not have detectable sGC, were transfected for 48 hours with wild-type, 1C243A/β1 or 1/β1C122A mutants then treated for 1 hour with 100 µmol/L GTN or vehicle; NO-stimulated sGC activity of the various cytosols was assayed. As shown in Figure 5, wild-type lost more than 50% of the response to SNAP after GTN treatment (50.7%±1.4% desensitization). Mutants C243A and C122A had a 30.1%±4.6% and 33.6%±4.5% decrease in NO-stimulated activity, respectively, which corresponds to elimination of approximately 40% of the desensitization seen in the wild-type. These results indicate a causal relationship between S-nitrosylation by GTN and desensitization of sGC in cells. We next tested if this causal relationship could explain nitrate tolerance.
|
Nitroglycerin-Induced Nitrate Tolerance Correlates With S-nitrosylation and Desensitization of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase In Vivo
Using a similar setup as with CSNO, we first established nitrate tolerance in the hamster cheek pouch preparation under acute conditions (50 minutes topical application of 1 µmol/L GTN). As shown in Supplemental Figure I, after initial vasodilation, the arterioles failed to relax in response to a dose challenge of 10 µmol/L GTN; the nitrate-tolerant tissues contain S-nitrosylated sGC (Supplemental Figure IB), which was desensitized by GTN as shown by the significant decreased in cGMP production in response to 10 µmol/L GTN, 100 µmol/L GTN, and 1 mmol/L SNAP (Supplemental Figure IC).
To study the sGC properties under conditions that mimic the development of nitrate tolerance in clinical settings, we used osmotic pumps to infuse continuously for 3 days low doses GTN (10 µg/min · kg) or solvent (propylene glycol), as previously described.26 There was vasodilation in response to 10 µmol/L GTN in animals treated with the solvent (1.37±0.13-fold increase) and no vasodilation in the 3-day GTN-treated animals confirming nitrate tolerance development (Figure 6A). After the 3-day infusion, the lungs and cheek pouches were collected. Both biotin–avidin assay (Figure 6B) and IP with anti-SNO (Figure 6C) show that sGC is S-nitrosylated after chronic exposure to GTN in the pouches and the lungs and that no or little S-nitrosylated sGC was detected in the animals infused with vehicle. Specificity of sGC S-nitrosylation was verified by pretreatment with 30 mmol/L ascorbate (Supplemental Figure II). Chronic GTN treatment led to a marked increase in the amount of sGC in both pouches and lungs (Figure 6B, input) as previously observed by others,27 yet the fraction that was S-nitrosylated remarkably increased as shown by the lower amount of sGC present in the unbound fraction (ie, the unnitrosylated fraction) of the GTN-treated animals (Figure 6C, right panel).
|
We next assayed desensitization of sGC. In the animals chronically treated with GTN, the cGMP production in response to 10 and 100 µmol/L GTN was greatly reduced in comparison to the sham-treated animals in lungs (Figure 6D) and in cheek pouches at 100 µmol/L GTN (Figure 6D, inset). Similarly, sGC desensitization was remarkable in response to 1 mmol/L SNAP, because chronic GTN treatment induced a 59% and 85% NO-dependent desensitization of sGC in lungs and pouches, respectively. The levels of cGMP produced in the lungs were also much higher than in the pouches (not shown), which could be due to the high levels of sGC present in the lungs (Figure 6B, input).
Importantly, we showed that there was crosstolerance; relaxation in response to 10 µmol/L SNAP was significantly reduced in the animals treated with GTN in comparison to the propylene glycol-treated animals (Figure 6E). This decrease in SNAP-dependent relaxation, which was associated with decreased SNAP-dependent cGMP levels (Figure 6D), suggests that sGC desensitization per se is, in part, responsible for the observed tolerance.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
In these in vitro and in vivo studies, we provide evidence that nitroglycerin treatment, whether at low therapeutic doses in animals or at higher doses in cells, is associated with S-nitrosylation of sGC and its desensitization, which correlate with the development of nitrate tolerance and crosstolerance in an in vivo model of hamster cheek pouch. This link between S-nitrosylation of sGC and vascular tolerance was supported by the observations that the S-nitrosylating compound CSNO induced vascular tolerance together with S-nitrosylation and desensitization of sGC. This correlation was strengthened by the fact that another S-nitrosothiol GSNO did not induce tolerance and did not S-nitrosylate sGC under the same conditions.
Vascular Tolerance Is Obtained With the Cell-Permeable S-nitrosocysteine, Which Induces S-nitrosylation and Desensitization of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase
We showed that topical application of an S-nitrosylating agent, CSNO, is sufficient to induce vascular tolerance in vivo and that the tolerant tissues contain S-nitrosylated sGC, which is desensitized. This CSNO-induced tolerance, which we define as the lack of relaxation of arterioles in the hamster cheek pouch preparation in response to SNAP, is intriguing because to date, organic nitrates such as GTN were the only established tolerance inducers. Tolerance is not readily observed after treatment with an NO donor such as sodium nitroprusside28 and S-nitrosothiols such as SNAP or GSNO.22,23 These NO donors, unlike CSNO, remain in the extracellular compartment or in the cell membranes and release NO extracellularly. Interestingly, we have observed that CSNO strongly S-nitrosylated sGC in intact cells,11 but not the other S-nitrosothiols GSNO or SNAP (not shown). These observations were in support of results showing that S-nitrosylation and modification of intracellular thiols depend on the ability of CSNO to readily enter cells through L-Cys transporters and do not depend on the release of NO.24 To strengthen the potential link between S-nitrosylation of sGC and tolerance, we repeated the topical application with GSNO under the same conditions as with CSNO and showed that the relaxation of arterioles in response to SNAP was maintained, indicating no development of tolerance. Moreover, the GSNO-treated tissues did not have detectable S-nitrosylated sGC, unlike the CSNO-treated ones. Yet, we cannot rule out that part of this phenotype is due to reversion by GSNO reductase. These results suggest that CSNO induces tolerance because it S-nitrosylates sGC potentially through transnitrosylation after its transport into cells. It should be mentioned that in our study, the concentrations of CSNO (and GSNO) required to induce arterioles vasorelaxation are higher than in other reports.29 One potential explanation for the decreased response to these NO donors is the fact that the hamster cheek pouch preparation is different from conventional ex vivo models such as isolated aortic rings that are precontracted with norepinephrine.
Does Nitroglycerin Treatment Induce S-nitrosylation of Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase and Thereby Its Desensitization Thus Contributing to Tolerance?
This hypothesis is based on our result showing that vascular tolerance could be caused by CSNO-induced S-nitrosylation, hence desensitization of sGC,11 and the recent report that GTN treatment leads to increased S-nitrosylation of tissues as measured by RSNO formation.30 GTN and other nitrates vasorelaxing effects are mediated by stimulation of sGC, and many communications reported on desensitization of sGC by GTN treatment and its relationship to nitrate tolerance but without providing a mechanism of desensitization.6,27,31 We showed that GTN treatment, whether at low therapeutic doses in vivo or at various doses in SMC, lead to dose-dependent S-nitrosylation of sGC. We previously showed in a purified sGC system using GSNO and by mutational analysis of the S-nitrosylated cysteines C243 and βC122 that S-nitrosylation directly causes desensitization.11 Thus, it was not surprising to observe that GTN-induced S-nitrosylation correlated with desensitization of sGC in cells. Moreover, replacement of C243 and βC122 led to partial elimination of GTN-dependent desensitization, supporting a causal relationship between GTN treatment and sGC desensitization. Elimination of desensitization was not complete suggesting that other cysteine could be involved in GTN-dependent desensitization of sGC. We observed the same association in our in vivo model of nitrate tolerance. We first use an "acute" model (50 minutes GTN infusion in the cheek pouch) because the same tissue is assayed for tolerance (measurement of arteriole relaxation), sGC S-nitrosylation, and desensitization (Supplemental Figure I). However, nitrate tolerance develops clinically under prolonged exposure to low doses of GTN. Thus, to mimic development of nitrate tolerance in patients, we used osmotic pumps to infuse clinically relevant doses of GTN27 and showed that tolerant tissues contained S-nitrosylated sGC that was desensitized to GTN and to SNAP (crosstolerance). As reported by others,27 we detected an increase in total sGC amount in 3-day GTN-treated animals; yet, this increase was accompanied by an increase in the S-nitrosylated form of sGC, hence desensitized sGC, thus explaining the apparent discrepancy between higher sGC expression and decreased cGMP production.
Thiols Depletion and the Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase S-nitrosylation/Desensitization Model
The reversion of both S-nitrosylation and desensitization after 1 hour washout after GTN treatment and the fact that NAC prevents S-nitrosylation and desensitization of sGC in SMC fit well with the pharmacodynamics of nitrate tolerance. Reversibility of S-nitrosylation and desensitization could explain why nitrate sensitivity is progressively restored (4 to 12 hours) in patients after cessation of GTN treatment; this characteristic is used clinically in "intermittent nitrate therapy" to avoid development of nitrate tolerance.32 Likewise, NAC, a precursor of glutathione synthesis, is used to prevent the development of nitrate tolerance in patients treated with nitroglycerin33 based on the early Needleman’s model suggesting that nitrate tolerance is due to free thiol depletion7 (yet others have not observed thiol depletion34). In this model, GTN produced nitrosothiols through reactions with free thiols,35,36 which in turn activate sGC; therefore, prolonged treatment leads to depletion of the thiols and cessation of activation. However, we observed that GTN-dependent reduced vasorelaxation and desensitization of sGC is seen in response to the NO donor SNAP, which does not require free thiols to activate sGC. Thus, we speculate that NAC facilitates the reversion of S-nitrosylation due to thiol depletion, which has been associated with increased S-nitrosylation of protein thiols.37 It is known that superoxide, generated by GTN treatment,26 is responsible for the production of reactive nitrogen species, in particular N2O3,38 which could directly S-nitrosylate thiol of proteins or convert glutathione or L-Cys to form GSNO and CSNO,39 respectively. This latter reaction not only will deplete the cells of free thiols, but also generate S-nitrosothiols, known to be increased by GTN treatment,30 which could S-nitrosylate proteins through transnitrosylation.14 We speculate that continuous GTN treatment by affecting the equilibrium between the reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species produced and intracellular glutathione levels could favor S-nitrosylation.
How Does Soluble Guanylyl Cyclase Desensitization by S-nitrosylation Fit in the Mechanism-Based, Classical Tolerance?
The development of nitrate tolerance is multifactorial and the cGMP-dependent loss of vasorelaxation is not well understood.3 Chronic GTN treatment leads to generation of superoxide26 and this reactive oxygen species production could induce thiol oxidation. In this study, we measured specifically S-nitrosylation and therefore we cannot rule out that the sGC could be desensitized by other thiol modifications, including disulfide bond formation or glutathionylation. Upstream of sGC, the high production of reactive oxygen species was shown to lead to endothelial dysfunction, which is proposed to be a mechanism of nitrate tolerance; for example, chronic GTN treatment resulted in a loss of acetylcholine-induced relaxation.40 Consequently, this reduced NO availability should decrease sGC activation. Recently, inhibition of mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase, which is involved in GTN bioconversion, has been identified as a major mechanism of nitrate tolerance.6 This impairment in GTN bioconversion is reflected by a decreased stimulation of sGC because of reduced NO or derivatives.3 Downstream of sGC, increased cGMP degradation through increased PDE expression could also contribute to nitrate tolerance (in our experiments, this mechanism was eliminated by the use of IBMX, an inhibitor of PDE).8 We showed that chronic nitroglycerin treatment (or application of the S-nitrosylating agent CSNO) leads to a partial loss of arterioles relaxation and decreased cGMP production in response to SNAP, suggesting crosstolerance. This result indicates that sGC activity per se is affected by the nitroglycerin/CSNO treatment as SNAP spontaneously released NO, bypassing GTN bioconversion or endothelial NO availability, at least in the vascular system of the hamster cheek pouch. Nonetheless, the response to SNAP was not as blunted as the response to GTN suggesting that desensitization of sGC is another site affected by nitroglycerin in addition to the main upstream site (mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibition) for establishment of nitrate tolerance. Thus, nitroglycerin-induced tolerance could be the result of a double setback for sGC; impairment of GTN bioconversion deprived sGC from activation by NO derivatives and S-nitrosylation of sGC prevents any further activation.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Dr Andrew Harris for critical reading of the manuscript.
Sources of Funding
This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grants GM067640, HL089771 (A.B.) and HL070634 (W.N.D.).
Disclosures
None.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Original received March 4, 2008; revision received July 17, 2008; accepted July 23, 2008.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Hashimoto S, Kobayashi A. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glyceryl trinitrate and its metabolites. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003; 42: 205–221.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Fung HL. Biochemical mechanism of nitroglycerin action and tolerance: is this old mystery solved? Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2004; 44: 67–85.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Munzel T, Daiber A, Mulsch A. Explaining the phenomenon of nitrate tolerance. Circ Res. 2005; 97: 618–628.
4. Katsuki S, Arnold W, Mittal C, Murad F. Stimulation of guanylate cyclase by sodium nitroprusside, nitroglycerin and nitric oxide in various tissue preparations and comparison to the effects of sodium azide and hydroxylamine. J Cyclic Nucleotide Res. 1977; 3: 23–35.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Chen Z, Zhang J, Stamler JS. Identification of the enzymatic mechanism of nitroglycerin bioactivation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 8306–8311.
6. Sydow K, Daiber A, Oelze M, Chen Z, August M, Wendt M, Ullrich V, Mulsch A, Schulz E, Keaney JF Jr, Stamler JS, Munzel T. Central role of mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase and reactive oxygen species in nitroglycerin tolerance and cross-tolerance. J Clin Invest. 2004; 113: 482–489.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Needleman P, Jakschik B, Johnson EM Jr. Sulfhydryl requirement for relaxation of vascular smooth muscle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1973; 187: 324–331.
8. Kim D, Rybalkin SD, Pi X, Wang Y, Zhang C, Munzel T, Beavo JA, Berk BC, Yan C. Upregulation of phosphodiesterase 1A1 expression is associated with the development of nitrate tolerance. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2338–2343.
9. Kuzkaya N, Weissmann N, Harrison DG, Dikalov S. Interactions of peroxynitrite, tetrahydrobiopterin, ascorbic acid, and thiols: implications for uncoupling endothelial nitric-oxide synthase. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 22546–22554.
10. Molina CR, Andresen JW, Rapoport RM, Waldman S, Murad F. Effect of in vivo nitroglycerin therapy on endothelium-dependent and independent vascular relaxation and cyclic GMP accumulation in rat aorta. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1987; 10: 371–378.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Sayed N, Baskaran P, Ma X, van den Akker F, Beuve A. Desensitization of soluble guanylyl cyclase, the NO receptor, by S-nitrosylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104: 12312–12317.
12. Bin JP, Doctor A, Lindner J, Hendersen EM, Le DE, Leong-Poi H, Fisher NG, Christiansen J, Kaul S. Effects of nitroglycerin on erythrocyte rheology and oxygen unloading: novel role of S-nitrosohemoglobin in relieving myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 2006; 113: 2502–2508.
13. Ignarro LJ, Lippton H, Edwards JC, Baricos WH, Hyman AL, Kadowitz PJ, Gruetter CA. Mechanism of vascular smooth muscle relaxation by organic nitrates, nitrites, nitroprusside and nitric oxide: evidence for the involvement of S-nitrosothiols as active intermediates. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1981; 218: 739–749.
14. Hogg N. The biochemistry and physiology of S-nitrosothiols. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2002; 42: 585–600.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Kim DD, Sanchez FA, Duran RG, Kanetaka T, Duran WN. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase is a molecular vascular target for the Chinese herb Danshen in hypertension. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007; 292: H2131–2137.
16. Lamothe M, Chang FJ, Balashova N, Shirokov R, Beuve A. Functional characterization of nitric oxide and YC-1 activation of soluble guanylyl cyclase: structural implication for the YC-1 binding site? Biochemistry. 2004; 43: 3039–3048.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Jaffrey SR, Snyder SH. The biotin switch method for the detection of S-nitrosylated proteins. Sci STKE. 2001; 2001: PL1.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Kim DD, Ramirez MM, Duran WN. Platelet-activating factor modulates microvascular dynamics through phospholipase C in the hamster cheek pouch. Microvasc Res. 2000; 59: 7–13.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Graves JE, Bates JN, Kooy NW, Lewis SJ. Vasodilator actions of the endothelium-derived relaxing factor L-S-nitrosocysteine in anaesthetized rats are markedly diminished by peroxynitrite. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2005; 32: 1137–1141.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Martinez-Ruiz A, Lamas S. Detection and proteomic identification of S-nitrosylated proteins in endothelial cells. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2004; 423: 192–199.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Jaffrey SR, Erdjument-Bromage H, Ferris CD, Tempst P, Snyder SH. Protein S-nitrosylation: a physiological signal for neuronal nitric oxide. Nat Cell Biol. 2001; 3: 193–197.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Bauer JA, Fung HL. Differential hemodynamic effects and tolerance properties of nitroglycerin and an S-nitrosothiol in experimental heart failure. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1991; 256: 249–254.
23. Smith MP, Humphrey SJ, Kerr SW, Mathews WR. In vitro vasorelaxant and in vivo cardiovascular effects of S-nitrosothiols: comparison to and cross tolerance with standard nitrovasodilators. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1994; 16: 323–335.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Broniowska KA, Zhang Y, Hogg N. Requirement of transmembrane transport for S-nitrosocysteine-dependent modification of intracellular thiols. J Biol Chem. 2006; 281: 33835–33841.
25. Scharfstein JS, Keaney JF Jr, Slivka A, Welch GN, Vita JA, Stamler JS, Loscalzo J. In vivo transfer of nitric oxide between a plasma protein-bound reservoir and low molecular weight thiols. J Clin Invest. 1994; 94: 1432–1439.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Munzel T, Sayegh H, Freeman BA, Tarpey MM, Harrison DG. Evidence for enhanced vascular superoxide anion production in nitrate tolerance. A novel mechanism underlying tolerance and cross-tolerance. J Clin Invest. 1995; 95: 187–194.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Mulsch A, Oelze M, Kloss S, Mollnau H, Topfer A, Smolenski A, Walter U, Stasch JP, Warnholtz A, Hink U, Meinertz T, Munzel T. Effects of in vivo nitroglycerin treatment on activity and expression of the guanylyl cyclase and cGMP-dependent protein kinase and their downstream target vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein in aorta. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2188–2194.
28. Chirkov YY, Chirkova LP, Horowitz JD. Nitroglycerin tolerance at the platelet level in patients with angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1997; 80: 128–131.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Alencar JL, Lobysheva I, Chalupsky K, Geffard M, Nepveu F, Stoclet JC, Muller B. S-nitrosating nitric oxide donors induce long-lasting inhibition of contraction in isolated arteries. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003; 307: 152–159.
30. Janero DR, Bryan NS, Saijo F, Dhawan V, Schwalb DJ, Warren MC, Feelisch M. Differential nitros(yl)ation of blood and tissue constituents during glyceryl trinitrate biotransformation in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101: 16958–16963.
31. Axelsson KL, Andersson RG. Tolerance towards nitroglycerin, induced in vivo, is correlated to a reduced cGMP response and an alteration in cGMP turnover. Eur J Pharmacol. 1983; 88: 71–79.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Parker JD, Parker JO. Nitrate therapy for stable angina pectoris. N Engl J Med. 1998; 338: 520–531.
33. Torresi J, Horowitz JD, Dusting GJ. Prevention and reversal of tolerance to nitroglycerine with N-acetylcysteine. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1985; 7: 777–783.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Boesgaard S, Aldershvile J, Poulsen HE, Loft S, Anderson ME, Meister A. Nitrate tolerance in vivo is not associated with depletion of arterial or venous thiol levels. Circ Res. 1994; 74: 115–120.
35. Wheatley RM, Dockery SP, Kurz MA, Sayegh HS, Harrison DG. Interactions of nitroglycerin and sulfhydryl-donating compounds in coronary microvessels. Am J Physiol. 1994; 266: H291–297.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Ignarro LJ, Edwards JC, Gruetter DY, Barry BK, Gruetter CA. Possible involvement of S-nitrosothiols in the activation of guanylate cyclase by nitroso compounds. FEBS Lett. 1980; 110: 275–278.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Han D, Hanawa N, Saberi B, Kaplowitz N. Mechanisms of liver injury. III. Role of glutathione redox status in liver injury. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006; 291: G1–7.
38. Pacher P, Beckman JS, Liaudet L. Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2007; 87: 315–424.
39. Mancardi D, Ridnour LA, Thomas DD, Katori T, Tocchetti CG, Espey MG, Miranda KM, Paolocci N, Wink DA. The chemical dynamics of NO and reactive nitrogen oxides: a practical guide. Curr Mol Med. 2004; 4: 723–740.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Watanabe Y, Kusama N, Itoh T. Effects of chronic in vivo administration of nitroglycerine on ACh-induced endothelium-dependent relaxation in rabbit cerebral arteries. Br J Pharmacol. 2008; 153: 132–139.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  B. Mayer, A. L. Kleschyov, H. Stessel, M. Russwurm, T. Munzel, D. Koesling, and K. Schmidt Inactivation of Soluble Guanylate Cyclase by Stoichiometric S-Nitrosation Mol. Pharmacol., April 1, 2009; 75(4): 886 - 891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. S. Stamler Nitroglycerin-Mediated S-Nitrosylation of Proteins: A Field Comes Full Cycle Circ. Res., September 12, 2008; 103(6): 557 - 559. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||