Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2008;103:331-333
doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.182246
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chin, M. T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chin, M. T.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
(Circulation Research. 2008;103:331.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorials

ATF-4 and Vascular Injury

Integration of Growth Factor Signaling and the Cellular Stress Response

Michael T. Chin

From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Center for Cardiovascular Biology, University of Washington, Seattle.

Correspondence to Michael T. Chin, Center for Cardiovascular Biology, University of Washington, 815 Mercer St, Rm 353, Seattle, WA 98109. E-mail mtchin{at}u.washington.edu



See related article, pages 378–387


Key Words: ATF-4 • vascular injury • FGF-2 • VEGF • smooth muscle proliferation

Smooth muscle proliferation and neointimal formation are characteristic features of vascular lesions that develop after vascular injury and contribute to the development of occlusive vascular lesions after percutaneous coronary interventions and in transplant vasculopathy. The traditional model for the development of these vascular lesions has postulated that a complex interplay among locally released growth factors and cytokines, circulating platelets and inflammatory cells, local smooth muscle and endothelial cells, and perhaps circulating precursor cells involving multiple cellular processes such as adhesion, proliferation, migration, and apoptosis is orchestrated at many levels, resulting in vascular stenosis. The temporal and spatial complexity of the overall process and the diverse contributions of various components have provided many opportunities for study, but identifying and linking the various critical steps in the development of occlusive vascular lesions has remained challenging. Although numerous studies examining roles of vascular signaling pathways and vascular transcription factors have been published, a clear picture of how signaling and transcription are intertwined remains elusive. In this issue of Circulation Research, Malabanan et al present a comprehensive series of experiments linking the transcription factor activating transcription factor (ATF)-4 to intimal thickening after injury and identify both upstream and downstream associated growth factor pathways, thereby providing additional insight into the orchestrated activation of transcriptional and signaling pathways in vascular disease.1

The authors initially identified ATF-4 as a potential regulator of neointimal formation through a microarray screen for genes induced in smooth muscle cells (SMCs) by fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-2. FGF-2 has been identified previously as a major smooth muscle mitogen and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and restenosis after angioplasty.2–4 FGF-2 is normally stored and rapidly secreted after injury3 and functions in both an autocrine and paracrine fashion. To confirm the microarray findings and determine their relevance in vivo, the authors examined the expression of ATF-4 in both a rat model of carotid artery balloon injury and in an in vitro model of SMC injury. As expected, they found that ATF-4 is minimally expressed at baseline, is rapidly induced in the carotid 4 hours after injury, and persists at lower expression levels at 5 and 14 days after injury, as measured by immunohistochemistry. In vitro, cultured rat SMCs subjected to scraping injury also demonstrated increased ATF-4 expression within 2 hours after injury. To confirm a primary role for FGF-2 in ATF-4 induction, the authors subsequently treated cultured SMCs with FGF-2 and verified that ATF-4 protein is induced within 2 hours of treatment. These findings provide, for the first time, evidence that ATF-4 is an important mediator of intimal thickening after vascular injury.

ATF-4 is a signal-responsive member of the basic leucine zipper family of transcription factors, binds to the cAMP response element, and is of particular interest because of its activation both by transcriptional and translational mechanisms in response to various forms of cellular stress. ATF-4 has been shown previously to be induced by hypoxia5 and amino acid deficiency6 and in response to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress.7 Until the present study by Malabanan et al,1 ATF-4 has not been implicated previously in vascular disease. Many transcription factors have been implicated in the pathogenesis of occlusive vascular lesions; however, the link between upstream activators and downstream effectors have been less well characterized. The study by Malabanan is distinguished from other studies in that it goes beyond simple induction of ATF-4 by injury and FGF-2 and identifies potentially important signaling pathways downstream of FGF-2 responsible for ATF-4 induction. Through the use of inhibitors of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways, the authors determine that FGF-2 activation of PI3K is required for induction of ATF-4, which correlates with phosphorylation of AKT, the major substrate for PI3K. Inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase, in contrast, had no effect. Furthermore, the authors provide novel data indicating that ATF-4 activates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A expression in response to FGF-2.

To demonstrate activation of VEGF-A gene expression by ATF-4, the authors used multiple approaches. Induction of VEGF-A has previously been described in vascular injury models8,9 and in SMCs after FGF stimulation10; however, the transcriptional mechanisms have not been fully elucidated. The authors found that overexpression of ATF-4 in SMCs enhanced expression of endogenous VEGF-A mRNA levels. Furthermore, both FGF-2 and scraping injury induced ATF-4 binding activity in nuclear extracts, as measured by electrophoretic mobility-shift assays using an ATF-4–binding site oligonucleotide derived from the VEGF-A promoter. These findings were further confirmed through the use of chromatin immunoprecipitation in FGF-2–treated cells, in which ATF-4 antibody was shown to immunoprecipitate the ATF-4 binding site of the VEGF promoter. The authors also mutated the ATF-4–binding sites in VEGF–luciferase reporter constructs and showed that FGF-2 induction of reporter activity was abolished when compared to wild-type constructs and that fibroblasts lacking ATF-4 did not demonstrate FGF-2–induced induction of VEGF-A when compared to wild-type fibroblasts. Finally, the authors used ATF-4 small interfering RNA to inhibit ATF-4 induction, VEGF-A induction, and neointimal formation after vascular injury, further underscoring the intimate relationship between ATF-4, VEGF-A, and intimal hyperplasia.

Although the study by Malabanan et al1 provides strong evidence for a role for ATF-4 in vascular injury, a number of important questions remain. Given the complexity of the process of neointimal formation and the pleiotropic effects of growth factors and transcription factors in cellular physiology, it is difficult to imagine that a simple model involving linear activation of FGF-2, ATF-4, and VEGF-A can fully explain the pathogenesis of vascular injury. Because the authors initially identified ATF-4 as an FGF-2 target in a microarray screen, one can hypothesize that a more complete bioinformatic analysis of FGF-2 target genes that are activated in SMCs would yield a more comprehensive view of transcriptional pathways activated downstream of FGF-2. Bioinformatic techniques such as Gene Set Enrichment Analysis11 would be useful to obtain such a global evaluation. Identification of important growth factor–dependent pathways in vitro may also provide further insights into the relevant important pathways in vivo.

Additionally, ATF-4 also has been linked to a variety of cellular responses and has numerous identified target genes. The data presented by Malabanan et al1 do not address whether there are additional targets of ATF-4 in addition to VEGF-A that may be contributing to smooth muscle proliferation and intimal thickening after injury. The authors speculate that ATF-4 may be regulating other relevant molecules such as platelet-derived growth factor receptor-{alpha}, cholesterol 25-hyroxylase, and the angiotensin II receptor; however, a comprehensive and systematic evaluation of ATF-4–dependent target genes in SMCs would ultimately provide additional useful information.

One particular aspect of ATF-4 biology that is intriguing and worthy of further study involves the relationship to ER stress, also referred to as the unfolded protein response (reviewed elsewhere12,13). ATF-4 functions downstream of PERK (protein kinase RNA-like ER kinase) and is activated by increased phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor-2{alpha}, which leads to increased translation of ATF-4 mRNA into protein. To the authors’ credit, they present additional data that vascular injury and FGF-2 treatment lead to increased phosphorylation of eukaryotic initiation factor-2{alpha}, which implies that ER stress is an important mechanism in vascular injury and may also contribute to the induction of ATF-4 protein expression. ATF-4 is known to increase the expression of other stress response genes that promote recovery, such as the chaperone Grp78,7 genes involved in amino acid import, glutathione synthesis, and resistance to oxidative stress.14 Future work detailing the downstream targets of ATF-4 relevant to ER stress will be of significant interest.

Another important question raised by the study of Malabanan et al1 concerns the role of VEGF-A in vascular injury and smooth muscle proliferation. Although the data presented are consistent with a role for VEGF-A in promoting intimal hyperplasia and are also consistent with previously published in vivo studies,9,15–18 others have reported the contradictory finding that VEGF suppresses intimal hyperplasia through promotion of reendothelialization.19,20 The authors appropriately point out this contradiction, which will await future studies for clarification.

The study by Malabanan et al1 is significant in that it links vascular injury to a transcription factor, ATF-4, associated with cellular stress responses and assesses both upstream (FGF-2) and downstream growth factor pathways (VEGF-A) that affect or are affected by expression of ATF-4 in response to vascular injury. Although the study raises many additional questions about the relationship of ATF-4 to other growth factor signaling and transcriptional pathways linked to vascular injury, it provides a clear framework for future investigation. Overall, it provides important insights into a complex process by demonstrating that ATF-4 functions as an integrator of the FGF-2 signal and an activator of the VEGF signal, thereby bridging 2 significant growth factor pathways, while orchestrating the stress response of the injured smooth muscle cell.


*    Acknowledgments
 
Sources of Funding

The author is supported by NIH grants HL076232, HL081088, and ES015915 and a grant from the Locke Charitable Trust.

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.


*    References
up arrowTop
*References
 

  1. Malabanan KP, Kanellakis P, Bobik A, Khachigian LM. Activation transcription factor-4 induced by fibroblast growth factor-2 regulates vascular endothelial growth factor-A transcription in vascular smooth muscle cells and mediates intimal thickening in rat arteries following balloon injury. Circ Res. 2008; 103: 378–387.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Lowe HC, Chesterman CN, Hopkins AP, Juergens CP, Khachigian LM. Acute local release of fibroblast growth factor-2 but not transforming growth factor-beta1 following coronary stenting. Thromb Haemost. 2001; 85: 574–576.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Santiago FS, Lowe HC, Bobryshev YV, Khachigian LM. Induction of the transcriptional repressor Yin Yang-1 by vascular cell injury. Autocrine/paracrine role of endogenous fibroblast growth factor-2. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 41143–41149.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Brogi E, Winkles JA, Underwood R, Clinton SK, Alberts GF, Libby P. Distinct patterns of expression of fibroblast growth factors and their receptors in human atheroma and nonatherosclerotic arteries. Association of acidic FGF with plaque microvessels and macrophages. J Clin Invest. 1993; 92: 2408–2418.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Blais JD, Filipenko V, Bi M, Harding HP, Ron D, Koumenis C, Wouters BG, Bell JC. Activating transcription factor 4 is translationally regulated by hypoxic stress. Mol Cell Biol. 2004; 24: 7469–7482.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kilberg MS, Pan YX, Chen H, Leung-Pineda V. Nutritional control of gene expression: how mammalian cells respond to amino acid limitation. Annu Rev Nutr. 2005; 25: 59–85.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Luo S, Baumeister P, Yang S, Abcouwer SF, Lee AS. Induction of Grp78/BiP by translational block: activation of the Grp78 promoter by ATF4 through and upstream ATF/CRE site independent of the endoplasmic reticulum stress elements. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 37375–37385.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Wysocki SJ, Zheng MH, Smith A, Norman PE. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression during arterial repair in the pig. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998; 15: 225–230.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Dulak J, Schwarzacher SP, Zwick RH, Alber H, Millonig G, Weiss C, Hugel H, Frick M, Jozkowicz A, Pachinger O, Weidinger F. Effects of local gene transfer of VEGF on neointima formation after balloon injury in hypercholesterolemic rabbits. Vasc Med. 2005; 10: 285–291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Belgore F, Lip GY, Blann AD. Basic fibrobrast growth factor induces the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor by human aortic smooth muscle cells but not by endothelial cells. Eur J Clin Invest. 2003; 33: 833–839.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, Paulovich A, Pomeroy SL, Golub TR, Lander ES, Mesirov JP. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102: 15545–15550.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Glembotski CC. The role of the unfolded protein response in the heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2008; 44: 453–459.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Ron D, Walter P. Signal integration in the endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein response. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007; 8: 519–529.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Harding HP, Zhang Y, Zeng H, Novoa I, Lu PD, Calfon M, Sadri N, Yun C, Popko B, Paules R, Stojdl DF, Bell JC, Hettmann T, Leiden JM, Ron D. An integrated stress response regulates amino acid metabolism and resistance to oxidative stress. Mol Cell. 2003; 11: 619–633.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Couper LL, Bryant SR, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Bredenberg CE, Lindner V. Vascular endothelial growth factor increases the mitogenic response to fibroblast growth factor-2 in vascular smooth muscle cells in vivo via expression of fms-like tyrosine kinase-1. Circ Res. 1997; 81: 932–939.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Bhardwaj S, Roy H, Heikura T, Yla-Herttuala S. VEGF-A, VEGF-D and VEGF-D(DeltaNDeltaC) induced intimal hyperplasia in carotid arteries. Eur J Clin Invest. 2005; 35: 669–676.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Ohtani K, Egashira K, Hiasa K, Zhao Q, Kitamoto S, Ishibashi M, Usui M, Inoue S, Yonemitsu Y, Sueishi K, Sata M, Shibuya M, Sunagawa K. Blockade of vascular endothelial growth factor suppresses experimental restenosis after intraluminal injury by inhibiting recruitment of monocyte lineage cells. Circulation. 2004; 110: 2444–2452.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Zhao Q, Egashira K, Hiasa K, Ishibashi M, Inoue S, Ohtani K, Tan C, Shibuya M, Takeshita A, Sunagawa K. Essential role of vascular endothelial growth factor and Flt-1 signals in neointimal formation after periadventitial injury. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 2284–2289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Asahara T, Bauters C, Pastore C, Kearney M, Rossow S, Bunting S, Ferrara N, Symes JF, Isner JM. Local delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor accelerates reendothelialization and attenuates intimal hyperplasia in balloon-injured rat carotid artery. Circulation. 1995; 91: 2793–2801.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Hutter R, Carrick FE, Valdiviezo C, Wolinsky C, Rudge JS, Wiegand SJ, Fuster V, Badimon JJ, Sauter BV. Vascular endothelial growth factor regulates reendothelialization and neointima formation in a mouse model of arterial injury. Circulation. 2004; 110: 2430–2435.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Related Article:

Activation Transcription Factor-4 Induced by Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Regulates Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-A Transcription in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells and Mediates Intimal Thickening in Rat Arteries Following Balloon Injury
Kristine P. Malabanan, Peter Kanellakis, Alexander Bobik, and Levon M. Khachigian
Circ. Res. 2008 103: 378-387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
S. F. Abcouwer and C. N. Roybal
Regulation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A by Activating Transcription Factor 4
Circ. Res., October 24, 2008; 103(9): e118 - e118.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
L. M. Khachigian, A. Bobik, P. Kanellakis, and K. Malabanan
Response to Abcouwer and Roybal
Circ. Res., October 24, 2008; 103(9): e119 - e119.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chin, M. T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chin, M. T.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article