doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.180596
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorials |
Mesenchymal Stem Cell–Derived IL-10 and Recovery From Infarction
A Third Pitch for the Chord
From the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Fla.
Correspondence to Nanette H. Bishopric, University of Miami School of Medicine, Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, 1600 NW 10th Avenue, RMSB 6026, PO Box 016189 (R-189), Miami, FL 33101. E-mail n.bishopric{at}miami.edu
See related article, pages 203–211
Key Words: Regulatory T cells • myocardial infarction • mouse model • regeneration
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells found in several adult tissues that are capable of differentiating into a number of different mesenchymal tissues, including muscle, bone, adipose tissue, cardiac myocytes, and neural precursors. When transplanted into allogeneic tissues, these cells may persist for long periods of time, suggesting that they can evade immune surveillance and contribute to the repair of damaged tissues. Unfractionated or minimally refined bone marrow cell preparations, which probably contain a mixture of hematopoeitic, mesenchymal, and endothelial precursor cells in addition to dendritic cells, can reduce myocardial infarct size and improve performance after infarction, both in rodent models and in human clinical trials, although the exact extent to which these cells form new cardiac myocytes and promote long-term improvement in functional capacity is still hotly debated.
One of the undisputed features of MSCs is their ability to produce a variety of trophic and immunomodulatory factors that can directly promote cell survival and reduce inflammation. A number of groups have explored the possibility that such MSC-derived factors may account for much or all of their therapeutic properties in vivo. Whether or not MSC-dependent myocardial salvage involves cardiomyogenic differentiation or long-term persistence of the cells,1–3 factors secreted by MSCs appear to contribute importantly to the outcome.4 Genetic or preconditioning-mediated enhancement of such factors has been shown to improve the therapeutic properties of MSCs.2,4 Obviously identification of the factors responsible for these beneficial effects would have both scientific and practical impact. However, the factors produced by native MSCs have yet to be fully elucidated. In particular, the immunomodulatory properties of MSCs in the setting of myocardial infarction are poorly understood.
In this issue of Circulation Research, Burchfield et al5 report that production of the immune regulator IL-10 is critical to the therapeutic benefits of injected MSCs after myocardial infarction in mice. IL-10 is a negative immunomodulator involved in the differentiation of regulatory T cells, which play a critical role in the suppression of autoimmune reactivity and in termination of the inflammatory response. Dendritic cells producing IL-10, or DCs infected with an IL-10–expressing adenovirus, induce naïve CD4+ T cells to become regulatory T cells that themselves produce IL-10,6,7 and thereby preempt the alternative pathway in which CD4+ cells become proliferative T helper cells in response to inflammatory signals. MSCs are known to produce high levels of IL-108,9; the present article shows that endothelial progenitor cells also express and secrete high levels of IL-10, and continue to express IL-10 up to 3 days after injection into the infarct zone of mice. Thus it is realistic to consider a role for IL-10 in some of the previously demonstrated therapeutic benefits of human endothelial progenitor cells as well as of bone marrow–derived MSCs.
To address this question directly, the authors obtained MSCs from bone marrow of mice with homozygous inactivation of IL-10. These mice are viable, and after myocardial infarction are not different from wt in survival, fibrosis, or myocardial remodeling.10 The authors confirm this finding as well as showing that apoptosis rates at 4 days and capillary growth at 14 days after MI are similar. They also show that the spectrum and quantity of MSC-secreted cytokines are identical for the 2 genotypes. As anticipated, direct injection of wt MSCs into the infarct border zone resulted in improvement in cardiac function, documented not only by the normalization of ventricular pressure-volume relationships but also by the biologically relevant readout of reduced compensatory hypertrophy. In contrast, IL-10–deficient MSCs were no more effective than diluent media. Despite this striking result, infarct size was not altered, and there was no detectable effect on apoptosis rates. The authors propose that IL-10 is responsible for the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs, and that these exogenously delivered cells act by reducing T cell infiltration in the infarcted myocardium.
Two previously offered explanations for MSC efficacy, to wit, myocyte replacement and paracrine factor–mediated enhanced cell survival, do not appear to explain the observations presented here. On the other hand, a longstanding body of evidence supports a role for IL-10 in mediating inflammatory responses in the heart. Loss of IL-10 shortens cardiac allograft survival together with exacerbation of IFN-gamma and iNOS-mediated inflammation,11 and cell- or virus-delivered IL-10 moderates cardiac allograft rejection and lengthens graft survival.12,13 If repression of cell-mediated inflammation by IL-10 accounts for the benefits of MSC transplantation, (and this still remains to be directly demonstrated), then the authors have uncovered a third paradigm for MSC therapy of MI: the positive immunomodulatory effect. Distinct from the evasion of immune surveillance, this action of MSCs would suggest that T cell–mediated inflammation is a major target in myocardial repair and regeneration, and that delivery of a potent anti–T cell factor is key to explaining functional recovery after stem cell transplantation (Figure). T-cell activation has been proposed to impair endothelial function and reduce the endothelial progenitor cell population, and T-cell–mediated immunity may regulate the extent and activity of atherosclerosis.14 The consequence of reducing inflammation may be therefore be to preserve contractile function in existing myocytes and to maintain and restore blood flow in existing blood vessels, without necessarily influencing the process of regeneration.
|
Several questions remain unanswered by the current study and will be important to explore further. At first glance, for example, it seems contradictory that IL-10 is so important in the transplanted MSCs and yet so unnecessary to the preservation of endogenous myocardial infarct size and function. However, it is quite plausible that the supraphysiologic delivery of IL-10 via MSCs has greater impact than the substantially lower amounts of endogenous IL-10 produced in the myocardium. Another question is whether delivery of IL-10 would be sufficient by itself to mimic the protective effects of MSC in acute infarction. Although the authors did not observe any effect of direct injection of IL-10 in combination with IL-10 KO MSCs, this could be because responder cells need to be exposed repeatedly to IL-10 over a period of time rather than subjected to a single dose.6 Sustained local synthesis and secretion may be critical to the immunomodulatory effect of IL-10. Delivery of IL-10 by injection cannot replicate this delivery system and moreover creates additional risks attributable to the rapid peaking of the unpackaged drug. There is clearly a concentration dependence of the effects of IL-10, such that excessive levels can promote rather than reduce inflammation.15,16 In addition, there may be autocrine or intracrine effects of IL-10 that affect the performance of MSCs in this myocardial repair assay. Further studies of biological differences between IL-10 KO and WT MSCs may help to determine this.
A final question is whether this observation excludes or minimizes the potential role of other cytoprotective or regenerative factors secreted by MSCs. Certainly not. In the current study, there was no reduction in infarct size by MSC transplantation; in other models and in other studies there have been quite striking reductions in myocardial scarring2,3 together with functional and metabolic improvements that suggest either improved myocyte survival or replacement. Within the repertoire of known cardioprotective factors, some clearly act by promoting survival,17 and others by enhancing regeneration, for example HMGB1.18 However, the present findings open up a new (in this context) and potentially important scope of action for MSCs as well as giving further impetus to studies of IL-10 as a therapeutic agent. The replacement of cells by their secreted factors in treatment of MI is conceptually a step closer.
 |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
Dr Bishopric is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01-HL71094, R01-HL44578), the Fondation Leducq (05-CVD-02), and the Florida Heart Research Institute.
Disclosures
None.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.
|
References |
|---|
 Top References |
|---|
- Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, Jakoniuk I, Anderson SM, Li B, Pickel J, McKay R, Nadal-Ginard B, Bodine DM, Leri A, Anversa P. Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature. 2001; 410: 701–705.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Uemura R, Xu M, Ahmad N, Ashraf M. Bone marrow stem cells prevent left ventricular remodeling of ischemic heart through paracrine signaling. Circ Res. 2006; 98: 1414–1421.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Amado LC, Saliaris AP, Schuleri KH, St John M, Xie JS, Cattaneo S, Durand DJ, Fitton T, Kuang JQ, Stewart G, Lehrke S, Baumgartner WW, Martin BJ, Heldman AW, Hare JM. Cardiac repair with intramyocardial injection of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells after myocardial infarction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102: 11474–11479.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Gnecchi M, He H, Liang OD, Melo LG, Morello F, Mu H, Noiseux N, Zhang L, Pratt RE, Ingwall JS, Dzau VJ. Paracrine action accounts for marked protection of ischemic heart by Akt-modified mesenchymal stem cells. Nat Med. 2005; 11: 367–368.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Burchfield J, Iwasaki M, Koyanagi M, Urbich C, Rosenthal N, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Interleukin-10 from transplanted bone marrow mononuclear cells contributes to cardiac protection following myocardial infarction. Circ Res. 2008; 103: 203–211.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Jonuleit H, Schmitt E, Schuler G, Knop J, Enk AH. Induction of interleukin 10-producing, nonproliferating CD4(+) T cells with regulatory properties by repetitive stimulation with allogeneic immature human dendritic cells. J Exp Med. 2000; 192: 1213–1222.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Rea D, Laface D, Hutchins B, Kwappenberg K, Melief CJ, Hoeben RC, Offringa R. Recombinant adenovirus-transduced human dendritic cells engineered to secrete interleukin-10 (IL-10) suppress Th1-type responses while selectively activating IL-10-producing CD4+ T cells. Hum Immunol. 2004; 65: 1344–1355.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Aggarwal S, Pittenger MF. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses. Blood. 2005; 105: 1815–1822.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Oh JY, Kim MK, Shin MS, Lee HJ, Ko JH, Wee WR, Lee JH. The anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic role of mesenchymal stem cells in corneal wound healing following chemical injury. Stem Cells. 2008; 26: 1047–1055.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Zymek P, Nah DY, Bujak M, Ren G, Koerting A, Leucker T, Huebener P, Taffet G, Entman M, Frangogiannis NG. Interleukin-10 is not a critical regulator of infarct healing and left ventricular remodeling. Cardiovasc Res. 2007; 74: 313–322.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Raisanen-Sokolowski A, Mottram PL, Glysing-Jensen T, Satoskar A, Russell ME. Heart transplants in interferon-gamma, interleukin 4, and interleukin 10 knockout mice. Recipient environment alters graft rejection. J Clin Invest. 1997; 100: 2449–2456.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- DeBruyne LA, Li K, Chan SY, Qin L, Bishop DK, Bromberg JS. Lipid-mediated gene transfer of viral IL-10 prolongs vascularized cardiac allograft survival by inhibiting donor-specific cellular and humoral immune responses. Gene Ther. 1998; 5: 1079–1087.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Salgar SK, Yang D, Ruiz P, Miller J, Tzakis AG. Viral interleukin-10 gene therapy to induce tolerance to solid organ transplants in mice. Transplant Proc. 2004; 36: 397–398.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hansson GK. Inflammation, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1685–1695.
[Free Full Text] - Qian S, Li W, Li Y, Fu F, Lu L, Fung JJ, Thomson AW. Systemic administration of cellular interleukin-10 can exacerbate cardiac allograft rejection in mice. Transplantation. 1996; 62: 1709–1714.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Li W, Lu L, Li Y, Fu F, Fung JJ, Thomson AW, Qian S. High-dose cellular IL-10 exacerbates rejection and reverses effects of cyclosporine and tacrolimus in Mouse cardiac transplantation. Transplant Proc. 1997; 29: 1081–1082.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mirotsou M, Zhang Z, Deb A, Zhang L, Gnecchi M, Noiseux N, Mu H, Pachori A, Dzau V. Secreted frizzled related protein 2 (Sfrp2) is the key Akt-mesenchymal stem cell-released paracrine factor mediating myocardial survival and repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104: 1643–1648.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Limana F, Germani A, Zacheo A, Kajstura J, Di Carlo A, Borsellino G, Leoni O, Palumbo R, Battistini L, Rastaldo R, Muller S, Pompilio G, Anversa P, Bianchi ME, Capogrossi MC. Exogenous high-mobility group box 1 protein induces myocardial regeneration after infarction via enhanced cardiac C-kit+ cell proliferation and differentiation. Circ Res. 2005; 97: e73–e83.
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Related Article:
- Interleukin-10 From Transplanted Bone Marrow Mononuclear Cells Contributes to Cardiac Protection After Myocardial Infarction
- Jana S. Burchfield, Masayoshi Iwasaki, Masamichi Koyanagi, Carmen Urbich, Nadia Rosenthal, Andreas M. Zeiher, and Stefanie Dimmeler
Circ. Res. 2008 103: 203-211.[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||