Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2008;103:1422-1429
Published online before print November 13, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.180083
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
103/12/1422    most recent
CIRCRESAHA.108.180083v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morikawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Cserjesi, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morikawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Cserjesi, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Myogenesis
Right arrow Cardiac development
(Circulation Research. 2008;103:1422.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Molecular Medicine

Cardiac Neural Crest Expression of Hand2 Regulates Outflow and Second Heart Field Development

Yuka Morikawa, Peter Cserjesi

From the Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Tulane University, New Orleans, La.

Correspondence to Peter Cserjesi, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Tulane University, 2000 Percival Stern Hall, New Orleans, LA 70118. E-mail pcserj{at}tulane.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The cardiac neural crest (cNC) lineage plays key roles in heart development by directly contributing to heart structures and regulating development of other heart lineages. The basic helix–loop–helix factor Hand2 regulates development of cardiovascular structures and NC-derived tissues including those that contribute to face and peripheral nervous system. Although Hand2 is expressed in cNC, its role has not been examined because of an early embryonic lethality when Hand2 is deleted in the NC lineage. We find that the lethality is attributable to loss of norepinephrine synthesis that can be overcome by activating adrenergic receptors. In rescued embryos, loss of Hand2 in the NC lineage leads to the misalignment of the outflow tract and aortic arch arteries. Defects include pulmonary stenosis, interrupted aortic artery, retroesophageal right subclavian artery, and ventricular septum defect, which resemble congenital heart defects attributed to defects in the NC. Hand2 functions in part by regulating signaling from the cNC to other cardiac lineages but not by regulating migration or survival of the cNC. Loss of Hand2 in NC also uncovered a novel role for the cNC in regulating proliferation and differentiation of the second heart field–derived myocardium that persists late into development. These results show that the cNC functions as a major signaling center for heart development and Hand2 plays a pivotal role in regulating both cell-autonomous and -nonautonomous functions of the cNC.


Key Words: neural crest • Hand2 • hypertrabeculation


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Development of the mammalian heart occurs through complex interactions between numerous lineages regulated by multiple signaling pathways that coordinate these interactions. A subset of neural crest (NC) cells, the cardiac NC (cNC) cells, invade the outflow tract (OFT) and are essential for septation of the conotruncus into the aortic and pulmonary arteries.1,2 These cells arise from the level of the otic vesicle through the third somite, migrate through the pharyngeal arches, and populate the aorticopulmonary septum and conotruncal cushion3 and contribute to the smooth muscle of aortic arch arteries (AAAs). In addition to the direct contribution to the OFT vasculature, cells of the cNC lineage participate in a number of morphological events in a cell nonautonomous manner. Although the NC lineage makes a minor direct contribution to the heart,4,5 defects in the cNC lineage has a profound effect on patterning the heart and accounts for a large numbers of human congenital heart defects (CHDs) including OFT and AAA defects such as persistent truncus arteriosus and tetralogy of Fallot.1,2

The involvement of cNC in the development of non-NC–derived tissue has been well documented.1,2 For example, the cNC, OFT, and endothelia interact, and this interaction is mediated by the semaphorin family of ligands and their receptors.6–8 Furthermore, a role for cNC in regulating the cells of the second heart field (SHF) has also been suggested. During early embryogenesis, ablation of the cNC results in a shortened OFT caused by an inability of the SHF cells to migrate into the primary heart tube.9 Although the mechanism underlying the signaling process remains unclear, members of the fibroblast growth factor10 and transforming growth factor-β families11 have been implicated.

The basic helix–loop–helix transcription factor Hand2 is expressed in the SHF and cNC during heart development.12 Deletion of Hand2 has shown that it is essential for right ventricle (RV) development and the survival of the embryos beyond 10.5 days postconception (dpc).13 In Hand2 mutant embryos, the RV forms but undergoes apoptosis,14 suggesting that Hand2 is required for survival, but not specification, of the cardiomyocytes. An essential role for Hand2 in cNC was also suggested from our previous study showing that deletion of Hand2 specifically in NC resulted in pooling of blood in the peripheral vasculature and liver of mutant embryos, which suggests a cardiovascular defect.15

Previously, it was not possible to examine the role of Hand2 specifically in cNC because of an early lethality in either systemic or NC-specific conditional knockout (cKO) embryos.13,15 We developed a pharmacological approach to rescue the embryonic lethality associated with the loss of Hand2 in NC, allowing an analysis of Hand2 function in cNC. We find that deletion of Hand2 in the NC lineage results in the misalignment of the OFT and AAA and defects that resemble those observed in CHDs associated with NC defects.1,2 In addition, we find that Hand2 expression in the NC lineage regulates development of the SHF-derived myocardium. The defects observed in the SHF-derived heart structures suggest that NC has a much larger impact on heart development than previously suspected.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Generation of Conditional Knockout Embryos
To generate embryos containing NC-specific deletion of Hand2 embryos, mice containing the floxed allele of Hand2 were crossed with the Wnt1-Cre line16 as previously described.15 Hand2fx/+ embryos were used as controls. To delete Hand2 in the noradrenergic neurons, we generated a DBH-Cre line by proneural injection of a construct containing 5.8 kb upstream region of the human DBH gene linked to myc-nuclear-Cre (gift from David Weinshenker, Emory University School of Medicine). Transgenic lines were tested for Cre activity by crossing the conditional β-galactosidase mouse line R26R [Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1Sho].17 To obtain embryos with NC ablation of Hand2 older than 12.5 dpc, the water of pregnant dams was supplemented with 200 µg/mL isoproterenol hydrochloride (Sigma) and 2.5 mg/mL ascorbic acid starting at 7.5 dpc. To delete Hand2 in myocardium and extraembryonic membranes, Hand2 cKO line was crossed with the cTnt-Cre18 and HoxB6-Cre19 lines, respectively.

In Situ Hybridization
Whole mount in situ hybridization was carried out with digoxigenin-labeled probes as preciously described.15,20 Plasmids used to generate these probes, nppa, PlxnA2, and Sema3C were obtained from mouse embryonic cDNA (Ambion) by PCR amplification and cloning of the PCR products into pBluescriptSKII.

Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemistry was performed as described previously.15,21 Antibodies used in this study were mouse monoclonal antibody against {alpha}-smooth muscle actin (diluted 1:500, Sigma) and rabbit polyclonal antibody against Ki-67 (diluted 1:100, Abcam). Secondary antibodies were labeled with Alexa 555 (Invitrogen) for fluorescence detection.

Cell proliferation was monitored by 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) incorporation as described previously.22 Proliferation rate was measured by counting BrdUrd-positive cells as a percentage of DAPI-positive nuclei. Sample means were compared using the Student’s t test.

Visualization of the OFT Vasculature
Blue latex (Connecticut Valley Biological Supply Co) was injected into the left ventricles of 16.5 dpc embryos. Immediately after injection, embryos were fixed in 70% ethanol, dehydrated in 100% ethanol, and cleared with benzyl benzoate: benzyl alcohol (2:1) solution.

Quantitative PCR Analysis
Total RNA was extracted and purified from the OFT of 12.5 dpc embryos using an RNA easy (Qiagen) kit. cDNA was synthesized using Superscript III (Invitrogen), and quantitative PCR analysis was carried out using iQ CybrGreen Supermix (Bio-Rad) chemistry in an iCycler iQ system (Bio-Rad). Three replicates of 4 samples were analyzed. Sema3C and PlxnA2 were quantified relative to β-actin using 2{Delta}{Delta}CT to calculate relative levels.23


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Activation of Noradrenergic Receptor Rescues the Embryonic Lethality of Hand2 cKO Embryos
Hand2 regulates development of numerous NC-derived tissues,15,22 but its function in cNC has not been examined because of early embryonic lethality with both systemic13 and NC-specific deletion of Hand2.15 When Hand2 is deleted in NC by crossing our conditional knockout (cKO) Hand2 mouse line with Wnt1-Cre, embryos die before complete development of the cardiovascular system (Table 1) and exhibit pooling of blood in the peripheral vasculature and liver.15 The phenotype resembles that seen in other embryos with cardiovascular defects resulting from NC-specific gene deletions5,11,24 but differs in that cNC defects generally do not affect embryonic viability. To analyze how Hand2 functions in cNC, we developed a strategy to rescue the early lethality.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Table 1. Survival Rate of Cre;Hand2fx/– cKO Embryos at 15.5 dpc

Hand2 is required for the expression of norepinephrine (NE) biosynthetic enzymes in the developing sympathetic nervous system (SNS),15 and loss of NE in the SNS leads to embryonic lethality.25 To determine whether this alone can account for the embryonic lethality, we deleted Hand2 specifically in noradrenergic neurons using a dopamine β-hydroxylase (DBH) Cre mouse line (Figure I, A through C, in the online data supplement, available at http://circres.ahajournals.org). When Hand2 is deleted by DBH-Cre, no mutant embryos were recovered past 12.5 dpc (Table 1), and all embryos collected at 12.5 dpc show pooling of blood in the liver and peripheral vasculature (supplemental Figure II, A and B), resembling the phenotype of the Hand2fx/–;Wnt1-Cre embryos. No other morphological defects were observed demonstrating that Hand2 maintains embryonic viability by regulating noradrenergic differentiation in the SNS.

Noradrenergic deficiency can be overcome by activation of adrenoceptors.25–27 When the β-adrenoceptor agonist isoproterenol was fed to pregnant mothers, approximately one-half of the Hand2fx/–;Wnt1-Cre cKO embryos survived to 15.5 dpc (Table 1), with a comparable number of these cKO embryos surviving to birth. This shows that embryonic lethality is attributable to a lack of adrenoceptor activation through loss of NE synthesis.

Hand2 Is Required for the Development of cNC
The main contribution of NC to the cardiovascular system is to the OFT and AAA. Using isoproterenol to rescue embryonic lethality, we examined the consequences of deleting Hand2 in the cNC on the development of OFT and AAA (Figure 1 and supplemental Figure III). Defects caused by loss of Hand2 included pulmonary stenosis (Figure 1D), interrupted aorta (IAA) type B (Figure 1B and 1C), anomalous origin of the right subclavian artery (ARSA) including a retroesophageal right subclavian artery (Figure 1B and 1C), and membranous ventricular septum defects. The rates at which these defects occur are summarized in Table 2. In addition to the arteries, the thymus is colonized by a subpopulation of cNC, and thymus abnormalities are often associated with CHDs.1,28,29 The thymus is normally located on the ventral side of the OFT close to the heart (Figure 1E). In cKO embryos, the thymus is located lateral to the AAA and in a more rostral position (Figure 1F) showing that the thymus is dependent on the cNC for positioning its vascular attachment to the AAA.


Figure 1
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Deletion of Hand2 in cNC results in multiple defects resembling CHDs. A through D, The organization of the OFT and AAA in control (A) and Hand2fx/–;Wnt1-Cre cKO (B through D) embryos at 16.5 dpc was compared using latex casts of the vessels. B through D, cKO heart with IAA and retroesophageal right subclavian artery (rsc) (B), cKO heart with IAA and retroesophageal right subclavian artery (C), cKO heart with misalignment of right subclavian artery and pulmonary artery stenosis (D). E and F, Loss of Hand2 does not effect migration of cNC to the AAA or thymus but results in their abnormal positioning. NC cells were traced by genetic marking using β-galactosidase in Wnt1-Cre;R26R (E) and Hand2fx/–;Wnt1-Cre;R26R cKO mice (F). Embryos were analyzed for β-galactosidase expression at 15.5 dpc. da indicates ductus arteriosus; ht, heart; IAA, interrupted aortic artery; lcc, left common carotid artery; lsc, left subclavian artery; pa, pulmonary artery; rcc, right common carotid artery; rsc, right subclavian artery; thy, thymus.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Table 2. Abnormalities Found in NC Deletion of Hand2

One mechanism by which deficiencies in cNC development can disrupt OFT and AAA development is through defective colonization by the NC. The distribution of cNC in the AAA was examined by lineage tracing using the R26R mouse line17 combined with cKO of Hand2 (Figure 1E and 1F). The tracing results show that NC contribution to the AAA is unaffected in mutant embryos.

Postmigratory cNC cells also differentiate into smooth muscle cells of the pharyngeal arch arteries.30 To determine whether Hand2 is required for smooth muscle differentiation, we analyzed the Hand2 cKO embryos for expression of the smooth muscle marker {alpha}-smooth muscle actin by immunohistochemistry. The expression of {alpha}-smooth muscle actin in the vessel walls of Hand2 cKO was unaffected (data not shown), indicating that Hand2 is not required for differentiation of the cNC into smooth muscle. Taken together, our results show that cNC expression of Hand2 is required for the patterning of the pharyngeal arch arteries and thymus but not for cNC migration or smooth muscle differentiation.

Semaphorin Signaling Pathway Is Downstream of Hand2
Misalignment of the vessels derived from the fourth pharyngeal arch arteries leads to IAA type B and ARSA, both of which are found at high frequency when Hand2 is deleted in NC (Table 2). These defects are also found in embryos lacking member of the semaphorin family ligand, semaphorin3C (Sema3C),6 and defects in cNC can lead to downregulation of Sema3C.11,31 To determine whether Hand2 regulates the expression of Sema3C or its receptor PlxnA2, we examined their expression by in situ hybridization in cKO embryos (Figure 2A through 2D). At 12.5 dpc, Sema3C is expressed in the myocardium of the OFT of control hearts (Figure 2A) and expression is not affected by loss of Hand2 (Figure 2B). However, the expression of PlxnA2 in NC-derived cells in the OFT of control hearts (Figure 2C) is downregulated in cKO littermates (Figure 2D). The levels of Sema3C and PlxnA2 messages were quantified by quantitative PCR analysis (Figure 2E). Consistent with the in situ results, Sema3C expression is not affected by Hand2 loss, whereas the expression of PlxnA2 in the OFT of cKO embryos are reduced to approximately 50% of control OFT.


Figure 2
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Hand2 regulates cNC expression of the semaphorin receptor PlxnA2 but not the migration of the cNC into the OFT. The expression patterns of Sema3C (A and B) and PlxnA2 (C and D) were examined in control (A and C) and Hand2fx/–;Wnt1-Cre cKO embryos (B and D) at 12.5 dpc. Expression of PlxnA2 is lost in the OFT of the cKO heart. E, Quantitative PCR analysis of Sema3C and PlxnA2. *P<0.0001. F through K, Lineage tracing of Hand2fx/+;Wnt1-Cre;R26R (F through H) and Hand2fx/–;Wnt1-Cre;R26R cKO (I through K) NC embryos at 10.5 (F and I) and 12.5 dpc (G, H, J, and K). F, G, I, and J, Whole mount staining for β-galactosidase activity. H and K, Sections through the OFT. Although the cNC populate the OFT, mutant hearts have a shortened OFT, suggesting a SHF-derived myocardial defect.

A possible explanation for the decrease in PlxnA2 expression is that cNC cells fail to fully populate the OFT. We examined if Hand2 is required for the migration of cNC cells into the OFT by lineage tracing (Figure 2E through 2H). At 10.5 dpc, cNC cells are migrating through pharyngeal arch arteries and migratory patterns are comparable between control and cKO embryos (Figure 2F and 2I). At 12.5 dpc, cNC cells are detected in the OFT of both control and cKO embryos (Figure 2G and 2J) and histological analysis of the OFT shows that NC distribution within the OFT is not effected by loss of Hand2 (Figure 2H and 2K). Thus, Hand2-deficient cNC cells may be incapable of responding to Sema3C signaling from the myocardium and display a phenotype similar to the Sema3C null embryos.

The NC Lineage Regulates Proliferation of SHF-Derived Myocardium
A remarkable and novel consequence of Hand2 loss in the NC lineage is the development of an enlarged RV (Figure 3A and 3B). Histological analysis revealed that the enlargement is attributable to hypertrabeculation, suggesting an overproliferation of the cardiomyocytes (Figure 3C and 3D). This overproliferation could be regulated by either shortening of the cell cycle or a failure to terminally differentiate and exit the cell cycle. To determine whether the proliferation rate of cells in the trabecular zone is increased in Hand2 cKO hearts, we labeled cardiomyocytes with BrdUrd (Figure 3E). In the trabecular zone of the RV of 13.5 and 15.5 dpc cKO hearts, the proportion of labeled cells increased 2-fold over control (Figure 3E). Significantly, increased proliferation was specific to the SHF derivatives in the trabecular zone of the RV with neither the compact zone of the heart (supplemental Figure IV) nor the trabecular zone of the left ventricle (Figure 3E) showing an increase in proliferation rates. To determine whether this represents an increase in the rate of the cell cycle or in the proportion of cycling cardiomyocytes, we examined the expression of the cell cycle marker Ki-67 (Figure 3F and 3G). The proportion of Ki-67–expressing cells increased 2-fold in the trabecular zone of the RV (Figure 3G), showing a doubling in the proportion of cycling cells. During normal growth of the trabecular myocardium, only myocardium at the base of the trabeculae proliferate (Figure 3H). An examination of the distribution of proliferating cells in the trabecular zone of mutant RV shows that they are distributed evenly through the trabecular zone (Figure 3I). Our results suggest that hypertrabeculation is attributable to a decrease in the number of cells that have exited the cell cycle.


Figure 3
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Deletion of Hand2 in the NC results in defects of the SHF-derived RV. Control (A and C) and Hand2fx/–;Wnt1-Cre cKO (B and D) hearts were analyzed at 15.5 and 17.5 dpc. A and B, A 17.5-dpc heart shows an increase in the size of the RV when Hand2 is deleted in the NC lineage. C and D, Transverse sections show that loss of Hand2 in the NC leads to hypertrabeculation in the RV. la indicates left atrium; lv, left ventricle; ra, right atrium; rv, right ventricle. E, Cell proliferation rate in the trabecular zone was examined using BrdUrd labeling at 13.5 and 15.5 dpc (n=3 in each genotype and developmental stage). *P<0.0001. L indicates left ventricle; R, right ventricle. F and G, The number of cycling trabecular zone cells was determined in control (F) and cKO (G) by Ki-67 expression. Loss of Hand2 in the cNC results in a 2-fold increase in the proportion of cardiomyocytes in the cell cycle. H and I, The distribution of proliferating cells was examined in control (H) and cKO (I) RV by BrdUrd staining. Loss of Hand2 in the cNC results in an even distribution of proliferating cells in the trabecular zone.

To determine whether molecular program accompanying the development of the trabecular layer is affected in mutant hearts, the expression of the trabecular zone marker atrial natriuretic peptide (nppa) was examined by in situ hybridization (Figure 4). In control heart, nppa is first detected in the RV at 10.5 dpc (Figure 4A) and continues to be expressed in the trabecular zone of the RV at 13.5 dpc (Figure 4C and 4E). Loss of Hand2 in NC resulted in a downregulation of nppa in the RV, whereas expression in the left ventricle remained unchanged (Figure 4B, 4D, and 4F). Taken together, our results indicate that Hand2 in the cNC regulates differentiation of the SHF-derived myocardium, and this interaction occurs before activation of nppa expression.


Figure 4
View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Expression of the trabecular marker nppa in SHF-derived trabecular myocardium is regulated by Hand2 expression in NC. A through F, The expression of nppa was examining in control (A, C, and E) and Hand2fx/–;Wnt1-Cre cKO (B, D, and F) hearts at 10.5 dpc (A and B) and 13.5 dpc (C through F) by in situ hybridization. The level of nppa expression is decreased only in the RV of cKO hearts. At 13.5 dpc, the level of hypertrabeculation in mutant hearts has not developed to the extent as 15.5 dpc hearts (Figure 3).

Myocardium Expression of Hand2 Is Required for Development of SHF-Derived Cardiomyocytes
Systemic deletion of Hand2 results in loss of the SHF-derived myocardium from apoptosis.13,14 To determine whether Hand2 is acting as a cell survival factor in a cell-autonomous manner, we deleted Hand2 specifically in the myocardium by crossing the Hand2 cKO line with the cTnt-Cre mouse line which expresses Cre after myoblasts begin to differentiate.18 A survival analysis of mutant embryos shows that they survive at the expected Mendelian ratio until 9.5 dpc, and then viability drops until 12.5 dpc, after which time no viable embryos were recovered (Figure 5A). A morphological examination of 10.5 dpc mutant embryos with severe phenotypes showed that embryos have a single clearly defined ventricle (Figure 5B through 5E). The phenotype of these cTnt-Cre deletions of Hand2 strongly resembles the Hand2 systemic knockout, suggesting that Hand2 expression in SHF cardiomyocytes is required for their survival. The hearts of cKO embryos that survive until 12.5 dpc also show hypoplastic RV and OFT (supplemental Figure V). The variability in survival may be attributable to variability in the level and timing of Hand2 recombination.


Figure 5
View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Hand2 is required for the development of RV and OFT in a cell autonomous manner. A through E, Hand2 was deleted in myocardium using cTnt-Cre and examined for survival and heart defects. A, Survival rate of the mutant embryos. Viability of mutant embryos begins to decline at 10.5 dpc. Morphological analysis of control (B) and Hand2fx/–;cTnt-Cre (C) hearts shows that loss of Hand2 in differentiating myocardium leads to loss of the RVs. Histological examination of hearts shows that the organization of the ventricle and outflow tract myocardium of mutant embryos (E) is disorganized and lacks trabeculation relative to control hearts (D). ao indicates aortic sac; lv, left ventricle; oft, outflow tract; rv, right ventricle; v, ventricle. Hand2 is not required for formation of the extraembryonic vasculature. F through I, Hand2 was deleted in extraembryonic and lateral mesoderm using HoxB6-Cre. The yolk sacs of Hand2fx/+;HoxB6-Cre;R26R (F and H) and Hand2fx/–;HoxB6-Cre;R26R (G and I) were analyzed at 12.5 dpc. Morphological analysis of yolk sacs shows a fully developed vasculature (F and G). Histological analysis (H and I) shows that development of membranes is not affected by loss of Hand2. vs indicates vasculature. J and K, Hand2 deletion in extraembryonic mesoderm does not cause embryonic lethality. Embryos with deletion of Hand2 in extraembryonic and lateral mesoderm survive to term. An examination of newborn Hand2fx/+;HoxB6-Cre;R26R (J) and Hand2fx/–;HoxB6-Cre;R26R (K) embryos shows that loss of Hand2 in lateral mesoderm results in severe limb defects.

Although embryonic lethality caused by systemic loss of Hand2 appears to be attributable to loss of Hand2 in the heart, it has also been shown to play a role in extraembryonic vasculature development.32 To determine whether the cause of lethality in Hand2-null embryos is attributable to a role in heart or extraembryonic mesoderm, we deleted Hand2 in the extraembryonic and lateral mesoderm by crossing with the HoxB6-Cre transgene.19 Mutant embryos are viable to birth and did not exhibit visible defects in extraembryonic mesoderm or blood vessel formation (Figure 5F through 5I). However, the mutant neonates exhibit severe limb deformities (Figure 5J and 5K). Loss of Hand2 leads to down regulation of Shh expression in the early limb, accounting for the limb phenotype.33,34 The deletion of Hand2 in extraembryonic membranes shows that it is not required for extraembryonic mesoderm or vasculature development, but its role in the SHF is essential for embryonic viability.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
In this study, we show that Hand2 plays numerous roles in cardiovascular development both in the NC and SHF lineages (Figure 6). In the NC lineage, Hand2 regulates embryonic survival through synthesis of NE in SNS. In the SNS, Hand2 is required for expression of the NE biosynthetic enzymes tyrosine hydroxylase and DBH.15 Activation of adrenergic receptors by NE is required for embryonic survival and myocardial growth.25,27,35,36 The targets of NE that are required for survival are not known with certainty but activation of adrenergic receptors is required during the time that the embryo transitions from a diffusable supply of oxygen and nutrients to dependence on an active circulatory system. The essential function of NE during development is likely to be the cardiovascular system.


Figure 6
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Hand2 expression in the cNC regulates multiple aspects of cardiovascular development. In the NC lineage, Hand2 plays a direct role in cardiovascular development by regulating the function of the cNC and an indirect role by regulating NE synthesis in the SNS lineages. In cNC, Hand2 regulates patterning of the AAA and OFT and formation of the ventricular septum. In addition, loss of Hand2 in the cNC affects the interaction of cNC with the SHF resulting in hyperproliferation of the SHF-derived trabecular myocardium of the RV. In addition to its role in NC during heart development, Hand2 expression in the SHF is essential for survival of RV myocardium. In the SNS, Hand2 is required for synthesis of the NE which activates adrenergic receptors and is required for embryonic survival and myocardial growth.

In addition to its role in the NC, it has been reported that Hand2 expression is essential for extraembryonic vasculature development and survival of SHF-derived myocardium.13,32 Because defects in either of these tissues could lead to the lethality at 10.5 dpc seen in the systemic knockout of Hand2, we examined the function of Hand2 in the individual tissues. Deletion of Hand2 in the extraembryonic mesoderm did not result in a defective vasculature suggesting that the previously observed defects may have resulted as a secondary defect caused by defects within the embryo. To determine whether loss of Hand2 in the myocardium is responsible for embryonic lethality, we deleted Hand2 only in the myocardium. Unlike the systemic knockout of Hand2 that results in lethality by 10.5 dpc, cKO embryos begin to die at 10.5 dpc with approximately 30% of mutant embryos surviving to 12.5 dpc. This enhanced viability may result from the timing and efficiency of recombination.

Within the NC lineage, loss of Hand2 leads to multiple defects resembling human CHDs including IAA type B and ARSA. These defects are also found in the embryo lacking Sema3C,6,7 suggesting an interaction between Hand2 and this signaling pathway. We show that a downstream target of Hand2 in cNC is the Sema3C receptor, PlxnA2. PlxnA2 is expressed in cNC and is often downregulated in embryos with cNC defects,7,11,31,37 suggesting that Sema3C may signal to cNC through PlxnA2. However, it has not been shown that PlxnA2 functions in cNC during heart development.

One of the remarkable finding is that loss of Hand2 in NC results in hypertrabeculation of the RV myocardium. Hypertrabeculation/ventricular noncompaction (VHT) is a congenital disorder38 that has been considered rare, yet recent improvements in imaging technology has revealed it occurs more often than previously suspected. Its cause is not understood; however, because VHT is often associated with facial dysmorphism39,40 and other NC-associated cardiac defects,41 it may be attributable, in part, to defects in NC lineage development.

The RV is derived from the anterior region of the SHF, which migrates into the primitive heart formed by the primary heart field.42 The regions formed by the SHF does not contain a significant population of NC, suggesting that an interaction between the 2 lineages occurs before, or during, migration of the SHF cells. Such an interaction has been suggested from cNC ablation studies in chick embryos. Ablation of cNC results in a failure of the SHF to migrate into the developing heart and to overproliferation of the SHF precursors.9,43 This interaction between cNC and the SHF occurs before the two lineages migrate into the primary heart field. Loss of Hand2 in cNC does not affect migration of the SHF into the developing heart but leads to their aberrant development after differentiation into cardiomyocytes. Our results suggest that transient interaction with cNC is sufficient to permanently alter development of SHF-derived myocardium. We speculate that this interaction must take place early in development, while the SHF and cNC are in close proximity. To our knowledge, this is the first report that cNC cells regulate later steps in cardiomyocyte differentiation and thus represents a new paradigm in heart development.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank David Weinshenker for providing the DBH-Cre plasmid for generation of the transgenic mouse line and Lisa Hua and Emily Maska for technical assistance. We also thank Judith Venuti and John Schwarz for a critical reading of the manuscript.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by an American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship (to Y.M.) and an American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid and a National Science Foundation grant (to P.C.).

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
Original received May 24, 2008; revision received October 15, 2008; accepted November 3, 2008.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Hutson MR, Kirby ML. Model systems for the study of heart development and disease. Cardiac neural crest and conotruncal malformations. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2007; 18: 101–110.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Snider P, Olaopa M, Firulli AB, Conway SJ. Cardiovascular development and the colonizing cardiac neural crest lineage. ScientificWorldJournal. 2007; 7: 1090–1113.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Kirby ML, Turnage KL, III, Hays BM. Characterization of conotruncal malformations following ablation of "cardiac" neural crest. Anat Rec. 1985; 213: 87–93.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Jiang X, Rowitch DH, Soriano P, McMahon AP, Sucov HM. Fate of the mammalian cardiac neural crest. Development. 2000; 127: 1607–1616.[Abstract]

5. Stottmann RW, Choi M, Mishina Y, Meyers EN, Klingensmith J. BMP receptor IA is required in mammalian neural crest cells for development of the cardiac outflow tract and ventricular myocardium. Development. 2004; 131: 2205–2218.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Feiner L, Webber AL, Brown CB, Lu MM, Jia L, Feinstein P, Mombaerts P, Epstein JA, Raper JA. Targeted disruption of semaphorin 3C leads to persistent truncus arteriosus and aortic arch interruption. Development. 2001; 128: 3061–3070.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Brown CB, Feiner L, Lu MM, Li J, Ma X, Webber AL, Jia L, Raper JA, Epstein JA. PlexinA2 and semaphorin signaling during cardiac neural crest development. Development. 2001; 128: 3071–3080.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Gitler AD, Lu MM, Epstein JA. PlexinD1 and semaphorin signaling are required in endothelial cells for cardiovascular development. Dev Cell. 2004; 7: 107–116.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

9. Yelbuz TM, Waldo KL, Kumiski DH, Stadt HA, Wolfe RR, Leatherbury L, Kirby ML. Shortened outflow tract leads to altered cardiac looping after neural crest ablation. Circulation. 2002; 106: 504–510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Hutson MR, Zhang P, Stadt HA, Sato AK, Li YX, Burch J, Creazzo TL, Kirby ML. Cardiac arterial pole alignment is sensitive to FGF8 signaling in the pharynx. Dev Biol. 2006; 295: 486–497.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Jia Q, McDill BW, Li SZ, Deng C, Chang CP, Chen F. Smad signaling in the neural crest regulates cardiac outflow tract remodeling through cell autonomous and non-cell autonomous effects. Dev Biol. 2007; 311: 172–184.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Srivastava D, Cserjesi P, Olson EN. A subclass of bHLH proteins required for cardiac morphogenesis. Science. 1995; 270: 1995–1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Srivastava D, Thomas T, Lin Q, Kirby ML, Brown D, Olson EN. Regulation of cardiac mesodermal and neural crest development by the bHLH transcription factor, dHAND. Nat Genet. 1997; 16: 154–160.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Yamagishi H, Yamagishi C, Nakagawa O, Harvey RP, Olson EN, Srivastava D. The combinatorial activities of Nkx2.5 and dHAND are essential for cardiac ventricle formation. Dev Biol. 2001; 239: 190–203.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Morikawa Y, D’Autreaux F, Gershon MD, Cserjesi P. Hand2 determines the noradrenergic phenotype in the mouse sympathetic nervous system. Dev Biol. 2007; 307: 114–126.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

16. Danielian PS, Muccino D, Rowitch DH, Michael SK, McMahon AP. Modification of gene activity in mouse embryos in utero by a tamoxifen-inducible form of Cre recombinase. Curr Biol. 1998; 8: 1323–1326.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Mao X, Fujiwara Y, Orkin SH. Improved reporter strain for monitoring Cre recombinase-mediated DNA excisions in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 5037–5042.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Jiao K, Kulessa H, Tompkins K, Zhou Y, Batts L, Baldwin HS, Hogan BL. An essential role of Bmp4 in the atrioventricular septation of the mouse heart. Genes Dev. 2003; 17: 2362–2367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Lowe LA, Yamada S, Kuehn MR. HoxB6-Cre transgenic mice express Cre recombinase in extra-embryonic mesoderm, in lateral plate and limb mesoderm and at the midbrain/hindbrain junction. Genesis. 2000; 26: 118–120.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

20. Morikawa Y, Dai YS, Hao J, Bonin C, Hwang S, Cserjesi P. The basic helix-loop-helix factor Hand2 regulates autonomic nervous system development. Dev Dyn. 2005; 234: 613–621.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Morikawa Y, Cserjesi P. Extra-embryonic vasculature development is regulated by the transcription factor HAND1. Development. 2004; 131: 2195–2204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. D’Autreaux F, Morikawa Y, Cserjesi P, Gershon MD. Hand2 is necessary for terminal differentiation of enteric neurons from crest-derived precursors but not for their migration into the gut or for formation of glia. Development. 2007; 134: 2237–2249.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001; 25: 402–408.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Luo Y, High FA, Epstein JA, Radice GL. N-cadherin is required for neural crest remodeling of the cardiac outflow tract. Dev Biol. 2006; 299: 517–528.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Lim KC, Lakshmanan G, Crawford SE, Gu Y, Grosveld F, Engel JD. Gata3 loss leads to embryonic lethality due to noradrenaline deficiency of the sympathetic nervous system. Nat Genet. 2000; 25: 209–212.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Pattyn A, Goridis C, Brunet JF. Specification of the central noradrenergic phenotype by the homeobox gene Phox2b. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2000; 15: 235–243.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Portbury AL, Chandra R, Groelle M, McMillian MK, Elias A, Herlong JR, Rios M, Roffler-Tarlov S, Chikaraishi DM. Catecholamines act via a beta-adrenergic receptor to maintain fetal heart rate and survival. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003; 284: H2069–H2077.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Bockman DE, Kirby ML. Dependence of thymus development on derivatives of the neural crest. Science. 1984; 223: 498–500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Guris DL, Fantes J, Tara D, Druker BJ, Imamoto A. Mice lacking the homologue of the human 22q11.2 gene CRKL phenocopy neurocristopathies of DiGeorge syndrome. Nat Genet. 2001; 27: 293–298.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Etchevers HC, Vincent C, Le Douarin NM, Couly GF. The cephalic neural crest provides pericytes and smooth muscle cells to all blood vessels of the face and forebrain. Development. 2001; 128: 1059–1068.[Abstract]

31. Lepore JJ, Mericko PA, Cheng L, Lu MM, Morrisey EE, Parmacek MS. GATA-6 regulates semaphorin 3C and is required in cardiac neural crest for cardiovascular morphogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2006; 116: 929–939.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Yamagishi H, Olson EN, Srivastava D. The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, dHAND, is required for vascular development. J Clin Invest. 2000; 105: 261–270.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Charite J, McFadden DG, Olson EN. The bHLH transcription factor dHAND controls Sonic hedgehog expression and establishment of the zone of polarizing activity during limb development. Development. 2000; 127: 2461–2470.[Abstract]

34. Fernandez-Teran M, Piedra ME, Kathiriya IS, Srivastava D, Rodriguez-Rey JC, Ros MA. Role of dHAND in the anterior-posterior polarization of the limb bud: implications for the Sonic hedgehog pathway. Development. 2000; 127: 2133–2142.[Abstract]

35. Zhou QY, Quaife CJ, Palmiter RD. Targeted disruption of the tyrosine hydroxylase gene reveals that catecholamines are required for mouse fetal development. Nature. 1995; 374: 640–643.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Jaber M, Koch WJ, Rockman H, Smith B, Bond RA, Sulik KK, Ross J Jr, Lefkowitz RJ, Caron MG, Giros B. Essential role of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 in cardiac development and function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93: 12974–12979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Hamblet NS, Lijam N, Ruiz-Lozano P, Wang J, Yang Y, Luo Z, Mei L, Chien KR, Sussman DJ, Wynshaw-Boris A. Dishevelled 2 is essential for cardiac outflow tract development, somite segmentation and neural tube closure. Development. 2002; 129: 5827–5838.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

38. Weiford BC, Subbarao VD, Mulhern KM. Noncompaction of the ventricular myocardium. Circulation. 2004; 109: 2965–2971.[Free Full Text]

39. Chin TK, Perloff JK, Williams RG, Jue K, Mohrmann R. Isolated noncompaction of left ventricular myocardium. A study of eight cases. Circulation. 1990; 82: 507–513.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Ichida F, Hamamichi Y, Miyawaki T, Ono Y, Kamiya T, Akagi T, Hamada H, Hirose O, Isobe T, Yamada K, Kurotobi S, Mito H, Miyake T, Murakami Y, Nishi T, Shinohara M, Seguchi M, Tashiro S, Tomimatsu H. Clinical features of isolated noncompaction of the ventricular myocardium: long-term clinical course, hemodynamic properties, and genetic background. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34: 233–240.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Kenny D, Hares D, Uzun O. Ventricular non-compaction in the setting of double-outlet right ventricle (tetralogy of Fallot type) with doubly committed subarterial ventricular septal defect. Heart. 2007; 93: 647.[Free Full Text]

42. Black BL. Transcriptional pathways in second heart field development. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2007; 18: 67–76.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

43. Waldo KL, Hutson MR, Stadt HA, Zdanowicz M, Zdanowicz J, Kirby ML. Cardiac neural crest is necessary for normal addition of the myocardium to the arterial pole from the secondary heart field. Dev Biol. 2005; 281: 66–77.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
Y. Morikawa, A. Zehir, E. Maska, C. Deng, M. D. Schneider, Y. Mishina, and P. Cserjesi
BMP signaling regulates sympathetic nervous system development through Smad4-dependent and -independent pathways
Development, November 1, 2009; 136(21): 3575 - 3584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
103/12/1422    most recent
CIRCRESAHA.108.180083v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morikawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Cserjesi, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morikawa, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Cserjesi, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Myogenesis
Right arrow Cardiac development