Reviews |
From the Winters Center for Heart Failure Research, Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Baylor College of Medicine, and the Texas Heart Institute at St. Lukes Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Tex.
Correspondence to Douglas L. Mann, MD, Faculty Center, 1709 Dryden Rd, BCM620, FC 9.30, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail dmann{at}bcm.tmc.edu
This Review is part of a thematic series on MicroRNAs and Heart Disease, which includes the following articles:
Toward MicroRNA-Based Therapeutics for Heart Disease: The Sense in Antisense [2008;103:919–928]
The Emerging Role of MicroRNAs in Cardiac Remodeling and Heart Failure
Role of MicroRNAs in Cardiac Development
MicroRNAs and Angiogenesis
Eric Olson Guest Editor
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: heart failure cardiac remodeling microRNAs neurohormonal activation arrhythmia
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Biology of MicroRNAs |
|---|
|
|
|---|
7-nt region at the 5' end of the microRNA with the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of the corresponding mRNA target. However, because miRNAs are conserved more than the whole length of the mature miRNA, it is likely that the remainder of the miRNA (ie, outside of the 7 nucleotide region that pairs with the 3' UTR of the mRNA) may also play a role in determining the target mRNA. As shown in Figure 1, binding of miRNAs to their cognate target mRNAs commonly leads to decreased expression of target genes through translation repression or mRNA degradation. Increased expression levels of miRNAs can also result in the "paradoxical" upregulation of previously suppressed target genes either directly, by decreasing the expression of inhibitory proteins and/or transcription factors, or indirectly, by inhibiting the expression levels of inhibitory miRNAs. Alternatively, decreased expression levels of inhibitory miRNAs can lead directly to increased target gene expression.4
|
According to miRBase (http://microrna.sanger.ac.uk), the online reference repository of information on miRs, there are currently more than 6200 published mature miRNA sequences, including more than 700 miRNAs in humans. Moreover, additional miRNAs are continually being identified.5 The most common approach that has been used to study miRNAs thus far takes into account 2 characteristic features of miRs, that is, their tissue specificity and their disease specificity. With respect to tissue specificity, profiling miRNAs across various tissues reveals that miR-1, let-7, miR-26a, miR-30c, miR-126-3p, and miR-133 are highly expressed in the murine heart (18.5 weeks).6 However, at present we have very little information with respect to the temporal and spatial expression profiles of miRNAs in the heart. Disease-specific changes in miRNA expression have been studied using microarrays to determine which miRNAs are up- or downregulated in response to various forms of tissue injury. By identifying the signature miRNAs that are regulated in the heart, investigators have been able to use sophisticated computational approaches to predict the potential array of mRNA targets to which miRNAs can bind, which has led to the identification of previously unrecognized targets within disease pathways of interest. With that said, target prediction with the existing prediction algorithms remains challenging and requires careful experimental validation.7
| Expression Profiles of MicroRNAs in Experimental Models and Human Heart Failure |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human studies of miRNA expression profiles in heart failure are limited by the lack of standardized protocols, the small numbers of patients in the studies, and the high degree of variability in expression levels between patients. Two independent groups have performed microarrays on RNA isolated from nonfailing and failing hearts. Ikeda et al13 have obtained miRNA expression profiles in human heart failure using left ventricular (LV) samples from nonfailing hearts or hearts from patients with ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy or aortic stenosis. Interestingly, these authors were able to use a miRNA-based classifier to correctly classify the miRNA profiles into 1 of the above four disease-specific categories in 60% of the samples, suggesting that miRNA expression profiles are sufficiently distinct to predict clinical etiology with modest accuracy. Thum et al14 compared microarray data of miRNA expression profiles from nonfailing, failing, and fetal human hearts and observed that when compared to nonfailing hearts, 87% of the miRs that were upregulated and 84% of the miRs that were downregulated in the failing hearts were regulated concordantly in fetal heart tissue, suggesting that alterations in miRNAs levels may contribute to activation of the "fetal gene" program, which is among the signatures of hypertrophied and failing myocardium.
To better compare and contrast the altered expression profiles of miRNAs in various animal models of heart disease and in human heart failure, we have generated a 2D graphical map (Figure 2) that displays the relevant human and experimental studies in columns with the accompanying changes in miRNA expression levels depicted in rows. Analogous to conventional heat maps that have been used for gene and miRNA arrays, we have used red to indicate changes in miRNAs that are reported to be significantly upregulated and green to indicate miRNAs that were reported to be significantly downregulated. miRNA expression that was reported as unchanged is depicted in black, whereas miRNAs that were either not reported or whose change in expression was not statistically interpretable were left uncolored. However, unlike a conventional heat map, the color intensity of the miRNAs depicted in Figure 2 has not been adjusted to reflect the magnitude of change in miRNA expression. Using this approach, we obtained miRNA expression profiles on 172 miRs from a total of 10 different experimental and clinical models, of which 5 were in human tissue, 4 were in vivo studies in animals, and 1 was an in vitro study in cultured cardiac myocytes. For the sake of brevity and clarity, we did not graphically display the 101 miRNAs whose expression levels were changed in only a single study (see the online data supplement for the entire analysis, available at http://circres.ahajournals.org). The remaining 71 candidate miRNAs whose expression levels changed significantly in 2 or more studies are illustrated in Figure 2. Inspection of this map reveals that for miRNAs with increased levels of expression levels, there was good concordance between human heart failure and experimental models of pathological remodeling. Indeed, 25 miRNAs (7b, 7c, 10b, 15b, 21, 23a, 23b, 24, 27a, 27b, 29a, 103, 125b, 140*, 195, 199a, 199a*, 199b, 208, 210, 211, 214, 330, 341, 424) were upregulated in one or more myocardial samples from failing human hearts and experimental models, suggesting that changes in miRNA expression patterns in experimental models may provide further insight into our understanding LV remodeling in human heart failure. Interestingly, the expression profile of miRNAs with decreased expression levels were far less concordant in experimental models and human heart failure samples. Indeed, there were only 10 miRNA species (1, 10a, 26b, 30a_5p, 30b, 30c,150, 218, 451, 499) that were downregulated in one or more myocardial samples from failing human hearts and experimental models. It should be emphasized that different microarray platforms were used in the above studies, which may account for some of the observed differences in miRNA regulation.
|
To better understand how miRNAs may play a role in cardiac remodeling and heart failure, it is useful to recognize that cardiac remodeling represents the anatomic summation of a series of changes in the biology of the cardiac myocyte and the myocardium, including the volume of cardiac myocytes and the volume/composition of the extracellular matrix (ECM) (see the Table).15 As discussed below, there is emerging evidence that miRNAs play an important role both in the changes in the biology of the cardiac myocyte, as well as changes in the myocardium.
|
| MicroRNAs Involved in Cardiac Myocyte Hypertrophy |
|---|
|
|
|---|
miR-1 and miR-133
miR-1 and miR-133 are preferentially expressed in cardiac and skeletal muscle and have been shown to regulate differentiation and proliferation of these cells. Although miR-1 and miR-133 form part of the same bicistronic unit, they are expressed as separate transcripts. Both miR-1 and miR-133 appear to play an important role in the remodeling of the heart that occurs during cardiogenesis. During cardiac development miR-1 levels are low, whereas its cognate target, Hand2 (a transcription factor that controls cardiac myocyte proliferation), is expressed at high levels, thereby promoting cardiomyocyte proliferation.19 As the heart develops, miR-1 levels increase and Hand2 protein levels decrease as cardiac myocytes exit the cell cycle and differentiate in mature myocytes. In relation to the present discussion, levels of miR-1 and miR-133 are decreased in heart failure models (Figure 2). Studies by Sayed et al8 demonstrated that levels of miR-1 were suppressed as early as 1 day after aortic banding and remained depressed 7 days after TAB. Independently, Care et al10 demonstrated reduced expression of miR-1 and miR-133 in 3 models of cardiac hypertrophic, namely, TAB, mice with cardiac-restricted overexpression of constitutively active Akt kinase and rats subjected to adaptive cardiac hypertrophy following endurance training. These same investigators confirmed that the expression level of miR-1 and miR-133 were decreased in the hearts of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or atrial dilation. Unfortunately, this study did not examine miR-1 or miR-133 expression levels in myocardial samples from human heart failure.
The functional significance of the findings with respect to miR-1 has been demonstrated in gain-of-function studies in vitro and in vivo. For example, overexpression of miR-1 in cultured neonatal myocytes partially inhibited phosphorylation of ribosomal S6 protein and inhibited the computationally predicted in silico targets of miR-1 that were related to cardiac growth, including Ras GTPase-activating protein, cyclin-dependent kinase 9, fibronectin, and Ras homolog expressed in brain.8 miR-1 overexpression also suppressed myocyte spreading induced by serum and endothelin-1 and expression of atrial natriuretic factor (ANF).8
Overexpression of miR-133 resulted in suppression of protein synthesis and inhibition of hypertrophic growth in PE- or endothelin-1–treated neonatal mouse cardiac myocytes and upregulation of fetal genes, including those encoded by ANF, skeletal and cardiac
-actin, and
-myosin heavy chain (
MHC) and βMHC.10 Loss-of-function studies showed that sequestering endogenous miR-133 using a targeted 3' UTR decoy sequence resulted in marked cell hypertrophy and increased protein synthesis, increased fetal gene expression, and perinuclear localization of ANF, consistent with a potential role for miR-133 in suppressing hypertrophic growth.10 Furthermore, treatment of mice using an antisense RNA oligonucleotide (termed an antagomir) targeted to miR-133 resulted in cardiac hypertrophy and reinduction of the fetal gene program.10 Taken together, these studies suggest that downregulation of miR-1 and miR-133 allows for the increased expression (release) of growth-related genes that are responsible for cardiac hypertrophy. However, it is not clear whether these miRNAs contribute to the adverse cardiac remodeling that occurs in heart failure, insofar as the majority of studies in human tissue, save for 1 study,13 have not show that miR-1 and miR-133 are downregulated. Of note, the 1 study that did show that miR-1 and miR-133 were downregulated in human tissue examined dilated atria and myomectomy samples from patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, rather than LV myocardial specimens from patients with heart failure.10
miR-21
The role of miR-21 in cardiac myocyte hypertrophy is controversial at present. Two studies have shown that miR-21 is highly upregulated in mouse models of pressure-overload hypertrophy post-TAB.8,11 Moreover, Ang II– and PE-induced cardiac myocyte hypertrophy is accompanied by a 4- to 5-fold increase in miR-21 expression in isolated cardiac myocytes. Antisense mediated knockdown of miR-21 partially inhibited PE- or Ang II–induced cell growth and protein synthesis in neonatal rat ventricular myocytes.11 In contrast, a different group of investigators has shown that antisense knockdown of miR-21 provokes hypertrophy and increased expression of fetal genes in cultured neonatal cardiac myocytes.12 The reason(s) for the discrepancy between these studies is unclear but may be that modulation of hypertrophic growth by miR-21 in myocytes is through an indirect mechanism, rather than a direct targeting effect of miR-21 on hypertrophy-related genes. Indeed, miR-21 has no validated gene targets that are related to cardiac myocyte hypertrophy. Unfortunately, further investigations into the role of miR-21 in myocyte hypertrophy have been hampered, insofar as exogenously administered premiR-21 fails to be processed in cardiac myocytes, resulting in the inability to overexpress mature miR-21 in these cells.9
Other Candidate miRNAs Involved in Cardiac Myocyte Hypertrophy
Based on microarray data from aortic banding studies, calcineurin transgenic mouse models and human heart failure samples, van Rooij and colleagues9 identified 7 miRNAs that were upregulated and 4 miRNAs that were coordinately downregulated. Five of the miRNAs that were upregulated, miR-23a, -23b, -24, -195, and -214, provoked cardiac myocyte hypertrophy when transfected into neonatal cardiac myocytes (Figure 3), whereas transfection of miR-199a resulted in elongated spindle shapes myocytes that were reminiscent of the elongated cardiac myocytes observed in dilated cardiomyopathy. Of the miRNAs that were downregulated, miR-150 and-181b caused a reduction in cardiac myocyte size when transfected into cells.9 Cardiac-restricted overexpression of miR-195 resulted in a dilated cardiac hypertrophic phenotype at 6 weeks of age that was accompanied by exaggerated myocyte hypertrophy and activation of the fetal gene ensemble (Figure 4). In contrast, cardiac-restricted overexpression of miR-214 had no effect on cardiac phenotype. Of interest to the present discussion, miR-195 was significantly upregulated in 5 of the 10 studies illustrated in Figure 2, including human heart failure. Viewed together, these studies suggest that miR-195 may play an important role in adverse cardiac remodeling. Thum et al14 expressed 3 miRNAs that were upregulated in human heart failure (miR-21, miR-129, and miR-212) and showed that although transfection of a single miRNA had little effect on cell morphology, the simultaneous overexpression of all 3 miRNAs resulted in myocyte hypertrophy and reinduction of the fetal gene program.
|
|
| MicroRNAs Involved in Regulating Excitation–Contraction Coupling |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MHC, which hydrolyzes ATP rapidly and is expressed in the adult heart, to βMHC, which hydrolyzes more slowly and is expressed in the fetal heart. Whereas
MHC accounts for approximately 33% of MHC mRNA in normal human myocardium, the abundance of
MHC mRNA decreases to
2% in the failing heart.20 Given the aforementioned link between expression levels of miRNAs and the development of cardiac myocyte hypertrophy, it is logical to consider that miRNAs might also regulate the Ca2+ regulatory proteins involved in excitation–contraction coupling that are downregulated in cardiac hypertrophy. However, at the time of this writing, there is no information on how, or whether, miRNAs target genes that are related to Ca2+ handling in the heart. This statement notwithstanding, there are interesting data that suggest that miRNAs affect cross-bridge cycling.21
miR-208
Studies have shown that miR-208 is upregulated in response to a hemodynamic pressure overload, as well as in human heart failure.12,14 Olson and colleagues21 showed that miR-208, a cardiac specific microRNA that is encoded within an intron of the
MHC gene, is coordinately regulated with
MHC. Mice deficient for (miR-208–/–) appeared phenotypically normal at baseline; however, these mice had a blunted hypertrophic response following TAB, as well as decreased myocardial fibrosis (Figure 5). Of note, miR-208–/– mice did not express βMHC in response to pressure overload. Although mice with cardiac-restricted overexpression of miR-208 had increased expression of βMHC, they did not develop pathological remodeling. Taken together, these observations suggest that miR-208 is required for the development of cardiac hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis and that miR-208 is a positive regulator of βMHC gene expression.21
|
miR-21
Alterations in the expression or activity, or both, of myofilament regulatory proteins has also been proposed as a potential mechanism for the decrease in cardiac contractile function in heart failure, including changes in myosin light chains and the troponin–tropomyosin complex. As noted above, some,8,11 but not all,12 studies have implicated a role for miR-21 in regulating hypertrophic growth in cardiac myocytes. Although not yet studied in human heart failure, miR-21 targets the 3' UTR of tropomyosin and inhibits its translation in tumor cells.22 Further studies will be necessary to delineate the role of miR-21 in cross-bridge cycling in heart failure.
| MicroRNAs Involved in Regulating the Cytoskeleton |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and β-tubulin, which form the microtubules by polymerization. Vinculin, talin, dystrophin, and spectrin represent a separate group of membrane-associated cytoskeletal proteins. Disruption of cytoskeletal and/or membrane-associated proteins has been implicated in the pathogenesis of heart failure in numerous studies. Indeed, the loss of integrity of the cytoskeleton, with a resultant loss of linkage of the sarcomere to the sarcolemma and ECM, would be expected to lead to contractile dysfunction at the myocyte level, as well as at the myocardial level. At present, there is limited evidence that miRNAs are involved in regulating the cytoskeleton; insofar as relatively few studies have examined these targets.
miR-1 and miR-133
As noted above, the decreased expression of miR-1 and miR-133 allows for the increased expression of growth-related genes that are responsible for cardiac hypertrophy. Adenoviral-mediated overexpression of miR-1 suppressed sarcomeric
-actin organization that is normally observed in serum-deprived neonatal cardiac myocytes. The effects of miR-1 on cytoskeletal reorganization were also thought to be responsible for the inhibition of endothelin-induced cell spreading in neonatal myocytes.8 Similarly, adenoviral transfection with miR-133 inhibited the reorganization of the actin myofilaments observed in hypertrophic growth of cardiac myocytes (Figure 6).10 Two validated gene targets of miR-133 are RhoA and Cdc42, a fact that is of interest in that members of the Rho family of GTP binding proteins are involved in myofibrillar rearrangement and are, therefore, important for cell motility and contractility. miR-1 also targets a number of cytoskeletal-related proteins, including microtubule-related proteins, kinectins, actin binding proteins, and cadherins. Insofar as miR-1 and miR-133 do not appear to be downregulated in human heart failure, the significance of the aforementioned miR-induced changes in the cytoskeleton vis-a-vis the biology of the failing myocyte remains to be determined.
|
| MicroRNAs Involved in Myocardial Alterations in the Failing Heart |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MicroRNAs Involved in Regulating Cell Fate
Progressive myocyte loss secondary to apoptosis occurs in failing hearts and contributes to progressive cardiac dysfunction and LV remodeling. Apoptosis requires activation of a phylogenetically conserved ensemble of proteins belonging to the extrinsic (death receptor–mediated) or intrinsic (mitochondrial) pathways that ultimately lead to activation of executioner caspases and myocyte loss. The extensive synergistic regulation of pro- and antiapoptotic proteins in response to stress signals raises the possibility that miRs may be involved in regulating programmed cell death.
miR-21
miR-21 is upregulated in various cancers (malignant glioblastoma, colorectal carcinoma, cervical adenocarcinoma) and, based on its in silico–predicted proapoptotic gene targets, has been proposed as a potential antiapoptotic miRNA. Knockdown of miR-21 in glioblastoma cells leads to caspase activation and apoptotic cell death,7 and depletion of miR-21 in vascular smooth muscle cells leads to a dose-dependent increase in apoptosis and decrease in cell proliferation.23 As noted above, several independent groups have shown that the expression levels of miR-21 are increased 2- to 4-fold in the heart post-TAB.8,11 Although miR-21 levels were not examined in relation to myocyte apoptosis in these studies, the upregulation of miR-21 may represent a prosurvival stress response in response to hemodynamic pressure overload. In this regard, it is interesting to note that the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 is an indirect target of miR-21.23
miR-1 and miR-133
Although miR-1 and miR-133 act synergistically in controlling myocyte proliferation and differentiation (see above), the extant literature suggests that these miRNAs have opposite roles with respect to regulating cell fate. Xu et al24 demonstrated that overexpression of miR-1 in H9c2 rat myoblasts provoked apoptotic cell death, which was partially rescued by treatment with miR-133. Similar effects on oxidative stress–induced apoptosis were observed in H2O2-treated H9c2 cells, wherein cotransfection with miR-1 led to 60% reduction in the IC50 value necessary for oxidative stress–induced DNA fragmentation, and cotransfection with miR-133 resulted in a 40% increase in the IC50 value required for oxidative stress–induced DNA fragmentation. Qualitatively similar results were obtained when rat neonatal ventricular myocytes were exposed to H2O2.24 Subsequent computational analyses predicted that heat shock protein (HSP)60 and HSP70 were targets for miR-1 and that caspase-9 was a target for miR-133. Indeed, experimentally miR-1 suppressed HSP60 and HSP70 protein levels by
70% and
60%, respectively, whereas miR-133 decreased protein levels of caspase-9 and caspase-9 activity levels in rat H9c2 cells. The authors postulated that the relative levels of miR-1 and miR-133 may determine cell fate.24 In this regard, it is noteworthy that miR-1 levels are overexpressed in coronary disease and are highly upregulated in ischemic myocardium,25 wherein apoptosis is an important mode of cell death.
MicroRNAs Involved in Regulating Angiogenesis
Adequate myocardial perfusion is essential for maintaining cardiac myocyte viability, particularly in the failing heart, wherein LV filling pressures are elevated and subendocardial perfusion is compromised. Prior studies have suggested that fewer capillaries are present in end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy26,27 and postpartum cardiomyopathy.28 The failure to appropriately regulate angiogenesis and vasculogenesis in the failing heart can result in myocardial ischemia with subsequent loss of cardiac myocytes and/or interstitial fibrosis and may thus contribute to progressive myocardial dysfunction in heart failure. There is increasing evidence that miRNAs may regulate vascular integrity, angiogenesis, and wound repair. Indeed, a number of pro- and antiangiogenic microRNAs have been identified that target key proteins involved in endothelial tube formation, as well as endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and apoptosis.29 However, it should be emphasized that many of the miRNAs that have been studied thus far have been identified in neoplastic tissue and may therefore not be relevant to cardiovascular physiology. Nonetheless, 2 recent studies have implicated miR-126 in angiogenesis and regulation of vascular integrity.30,31
miR-126
Srivastava and colleagues found that miR-126 was enriched in endothelial cells derived from mouse embryonic stem cells and in developing mouse embryos. Subsequent studies in zebrafish showed that miR-126 knockdown resulted in loss of vascular integrity, as well as hemorrhage during embryonic development. These authors found that miR-126 directly repressed 2 negative regulators of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway, namely Sprouty-related protein (Spred1) and the phosphoinositol-3 kinase regulatory subunit 2 (PIK3R2/p85-β). Increased expression of Spred1 or inhibition of VEGF signaling in zebrafish resulted in defects similar to miR-126 knockdown.30 Analogous studies in mice revealed that endothelial cell-restricted expression of miR-126–mediated developmental angiogenesis, whereas targeted deletion of miR-126 resulted in leaky vessels, hemorrhaging, and partial embryonic lethality caused by a loss of vascular integrity and defects in endothelial cell proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis. Relevant to the present discussion, the subset of mutant mice that were not embryonic lethal had impaired myocardial neovascularization following myocardial infarction. It was further shown that miR-126 enhanced the proangiogenic actions of VEGF and fibroblast growth factor and promoted formation of new blood vessels by repressing the expression of Spred1.31 Taken together, these findings illustrate that a miR-126 is sufficient to regulate vascular integrity and angiogenesis. However, the relevance of these experimental findings with respect to human heart failure is unclear, insofar as miR-126 is upregulated in failing human hearts.
MicroRNAs Involved in Regulating the ECM
Changes within the ECM constitute the second important myocardial adaptation that occurs during cardiac remodeling. The myocardial ECM consists of a basement membrane, a fibrillar collagen network that surrounds myocytes, proteoglycans, and glycosaminoglycans, and biologically active signaling molecules. Important changes occur in the ECM during cardiac remodeling, including changes in fibrillar collagen synthesis and degradation, as well as changes in the degree of collagen cross-linking. One of the histological signatures of advancing heart failure is the progressive increase in collagen content of the heart (myocardial fibrosis). The increased fibrous tissue would be expected to lead to increased myocardial stiffness, which would theoretically result in decreased myocardial shortening for a given degree of afterload. In addition, myocardial fibrosis may provide the structural substrate for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, thus potentially contributing to sudden death.
miR-208
As noted above, Olson and colleagues have shown that miR-208, a cardiac-specific miRNA encoded within an intron of the
MHC gene, is required for cardiac fibrosis in response to hemodynamic pressure overload. Indeed, miR-208–deficient mice (mir-208–/–) were resistant to developing fibrosis following TAB, as well as cardiac-restricted overexpression of calcineurin, a calcium/calmodulin-dependent phosphatase that provokes pathological remodeling of the heart.21 Thus, miR-208 appears to be required for the development of cardiac fibrosis.
mirR-29
The miR-29 family is comprised of 3 members, mirR-29a to -c, that are expressed from 2 bicistronic miRNA clusters: miR-29b-1 is coexpressed along with miR-29a, whereas the second copy of miR-29b (miR-29b-2) is coexpressed with miR-29c. In an effort to identify miRNAs that were dysregulated in acute myocardial infarction, van Rooij and colleagues32 observed that miR-29 was downregulated in the border zone mouse hearts following acute occlusion of the left anterior descending artery and in the border zone of hearts from patients who were receiving cardiac transplant. A Targetscan prediction algorithm (http://www.targetscan.org) identified a high number of fibrosis related mRNAs for miR-29. Downregulation of miR-29 with antimiRs induced collagen expression both in vitro and in vivo, whereas overexpression of a miR-29 mimic in isolated cardiac fibroblasts reduced collagen transcripts. Moreover, stimulation of isolated cardiac fibroblasts with transforming growth factor-β, a profibrotic peptide, also resulted in decreased miR-29 expression. Taken together, these results suggest that the dynamic regulation of miR-29 in the heart may contribute to the development of myocardial fibrosis.
| MicroRNAs Involved in Neurohormonal Activation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
miR-155
miR-155 is sufficient to suppress the levels of the Ang II type 1 receptor (AT1R) in primary human lung fibroblasts by binding directly to the 3' UTR of AT1R mRNA. Functional studies demonstrated that transfection of miR-155 into human primary lung fibroblasts resulted in a significant reduction in Ang II-induced activation of the extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK)1/2. Furthermore, when fibroblasts were transfected with an antisense inhibitor to miR-155, endogenous AT1R expression and Ang II–induced ERK1/2 activation were increased significantly.33 Interestingly, a silent polymorphism (+1166 A/C) in the human AT1R gene that is associated with cardiovascular disease (possibly because of enhanced AT1R activity) is a target of miR-155. When the +1166 C allele is present, base-pairing complementarity to the 3' UTR of the AT1R is interrupted, thereby decreasing the ability of miR-155 to interact with the cis-regulatory site. The result is that miR-155 is no longer able efficiently attenuate the translation of the AT1R gene, leading to increased endogenous levels of AT1R and increased Ang II–induced activation of ERK1/2.34 Whether these observations have any relevance in the setting of heart failure is unknown and will require further study.
mir-21
The role of miR-21 in cardiac hypertrophy and cell apoptosis has been discussed above. Of note, Ang II has been shown to upregulate miR-21 expression in human adrenal cells.35 Moreover, overexpression of miR-21 resulted in increased aldosterone secretion and cell proliferation in these cells. Although performed in a cell type that resides outside the heart, this study raises the interesting possibility that increased miRNA-21 expression levels outside of the heart may contribute to adverse cardiac remodeling through dysregulation of Ang II–mediated signaling and enhanced aldosterone secretion.
| MicroRNAs Involved in Electrophysiological Alterations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
miR-1 and miR-133
The pacemaker function of sinoatrial and atrioventricular cells and cells in the ventricular conducting system depends on their ability to undergo diastolic depolarizations. The ionic mechanism underlying pacemaker depolarizations is governed by activation of the hyperpolarization-activated current (If).37 The HCN ion channel subunit gene family encodes hyperpolarization-activated cation channels that are permeable to Na+ and K+. It has been suggested that upregulation of HCN channels may contribute to enhanced automaticity and arrhythmias in heart failure.38 Relevant to the present discussion, downregulation of miR-1 and miR-133 has been associated with increased protein levels of HCN2/HCN4 in hypertrophic hearts.39 Given than miR-1 and miR-133 (Figure 2) are downregulated in heart failure models, these findings may have relevance to the development of cardiac arrhythmias in heart failure. Changes in the inward rectifier K+ current (IK1) have been suggested to play an important role in the genesis of both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias.40,41 In cardiac myocytes, IK1 establishes the resting membrane potential and modulates the terminal phase of repolarization. Transfection of miR-1 into healthy or infarcted rat hearts resulted in significant widening of the QRS complex, prolonged the QT interval, and exacerbated arrhythmias, whereas knockdown of miR-1 in infarcted rat hearts using an antisense resulted in decreased arrhythmias.25 Importantly, miR-1 targets genes that encode for connexin 43 (GJA1) and the Kir2.1 potassium channel subunit (KCNJ2), which may partially explain the proarrhythmogenic potential of miR-1. miR-1 and miR-133 have been shown experimentally to target KCNE1 and KCNQ1, which are the genes that comprise the channels that regulates the slow delayed rectifier current (IKs). However, given that miR-1 and miR-133 are downregulated in heart failure models, the significance of these studies with respect to IK1 and IKs and the development of cardiac arrhythmia in heart failure is uncertain.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by NIH grants UO1 HL084890-01, RO1 HL58081, RO1 HL61543, and HL-42250.
Disclosures
D.L.M. is a consultant for Miragen (Boulder, Colo).
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism and function. Cell. 2008; 116: 281–297.[CrossRef]
3. Mann DL. MicroRNAs and the failing Heart. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 2644–2645.
4. Gregory PA, Bert AG, Paterson EL, Barry SC, Tsykin A, Farshid G, Vadas MA, Khew-Goodall Y, Goodall GJ. The miR-200 family and miR-205 regulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 and SIP1. Nat Cell Biol. 2008; 10: 593–601.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Griffiths-Jones S, Grocock RJ, van DS, Bateman A, Enright AJ. miRBase: microRNA sequences, targets and gene nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34: D140–D144.
6. Lagos-Quintana M, Rauhut R, Yalcin A, Meyer J, Lendeckel W, Tuschl T. Identification of tissue-specific microRNAs from mouse. Curr Biol. 2002; 12: 735–739.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Watanabe Y, Tomita M, Kanai A. Computational methods for microRNA target prediction. Methods Enzymol. 2007; 427: 65–86.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Sayed D, Hong C, Chen IY, Lypowy J, Abdellatif M. MicroRNAs play an essential role in the development of cardiac hypertrophy. Circ Res. 2007; 100: 416–424.
9. van Rooij E, Sutherland LB, Liu N, Williams AH, McAnally J, Gerard RD, Richardson JA, Olson EN. A signature pattern of stress-responsive microRNAs that can evoke cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103: 18255–18260.
10. Care A, Catalucci D, Felicetti F, Bonci D, Addario A, Gallo P, Bang ML, Segnalini P, Gu Y, Dalton ND, Elia L, Latronico MV, Hoydal M, Autore C, Russo MA, Dorn GW, Ellingsen O, Ruiz-Lozano P, Peterson KL, Croce CM, Peschle C, Condorelli G. MicroRNA-133 controls cardiac hypertrophy. Nat Med. 2007; 13: 613–618.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Cheng YH, Ji RR, Yue JM, Yang J, Liu XJ, Chen H, Dean DB, Zhang CX. MicroRNAs are aberrantly expressed in hypertrophic heart - do they play a role in cardiac hypertrophy? Am J Pathol. 2007; 170: 1831–1840.
12. Tatsuguchi M, Seok HY, Callis TE, Thomson JM, Chen JF, Newman M, Rojas M, Hammond SM, Wang DZ. Expression of microRNAs is dynamically regulated during cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2007; 42: 1137–1141.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Ikeda S, Kong SW, Lu J, Bisping E, Zhang H, Allen PD, Golub TR, Pieske B, Pu WT. Altered microRNA expression in human heart disease. Physiol Genomics. 2007; 31: 367–373.
14. Thum T, Galuppo P, Wolf C, Fiedler J, Kneitz S, van Laake LW, Doevendans PA, Mummery CL, Borlak J, Haverich A, Gross C, Engelhardt S, Ertl G, Bauersachs J. MicroRNAs in the human heart - A clue to fetal gene reprogramming in heart failure. Circulation. 2007; 116: 258–267.
15. Mann DL, Bristow MR. Mechanisms and models in heart failure: the biomechanical model and beyond. Circulation. 2005; 111: 2837–2849.
16. Dash R, Kadambi V, Schmidt AG, Tepe NM, Biniakiewicz D, Gerst MJ, Canning AM, Abraham WT, Hoit BD, Liggett SB, Lorenz JN, Dorn GW, Kranias EG. Interactions between phospholamban and beta-adrenergic drive may lead to cardiomyopathy and early mortality. Circulation. 2001; 103: 889–896.
17. Urabe Y, Hamada Y, Spinale FG, Carabello BA, Kent RL, Cooper G IV, Mann DL. Cardiocyte contractile performance in experimental biventricular volume-overload hypertrophy. Am J Physiol. 1993; 264: H1615–H1623.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Anand IS, Liu D, Chugh SS, Prahash AJ, Gupta S, John R, Popescu F, Chandrashekhar Y. Isolated myocyte contractile function is normal in postinfarct remodeled rat heart with systolic dysfunction. Circulation. 1997; 96: 3974–3984.
19. Zhao Y, Samal E, Srivastava D. Serum response factor regulates a muscle-specific microRNA that targets Hand2 during cardiogenesis. Nature. 2005; 436: 214–220.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Nakao K, Minobe W, Roden R, Bristow MR, Leinwand LA. Myosin heavy chain gene expression in human heart failure. J Clin Invest. 1997; 100: 2362–2370.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. van Rooij E, Sutherland LB, Qi X, Richardson JA, Hill J, Olson EN. Control of stress-dependent cardiac growth and gene expression by a MicroRNA. Science. 2007; 316: 575–579.
22. Zhu SM, Si ML, Wu HL, Mo YY. MicroRNA-21 targets the tumor suppressor gene tropomyosin 1 (TPM1). J Biol Chem. 2007; 282: 14328–14336.
23. Ji R, Cheng Y, Yue J, Yang J, Liu X, Chen H, Dean DB, Zhang C. MicroRNA expression signature and antisense-mediated depletion reveal an essential role of MicroRNA in vascular neointimal lesion formation. Circ Res. 2007; 100: 1579–1588.
24. Xu C, Lu Y, Pan Z, Chu W, Luo X, Lin H, Xiao J, Shan H, Wang Z, Yang B. The muscle-specific microRNAs miR-1 and miR-133 produce opposing effects on apoptosis by targeting HSP60, HSP70 and caspase-9 in cardiomyocytes. J Cell Sci. 2007; 120: 3045–3052.
25. Yang B, Lin H, Xiao J, Lu Y, Luo X, Li B, Zhang Y, Xu C, Bai Y, Wang H, Chen G, Wang Z. The muscle-specific microRNA miR-1 regulates cardiac arrhythmogenic potential by targeting GJA1 and KCNJ2. Nat Med. 2007; 13: 486–491.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Carmeliet P, Ng YS, Nuyens D, Theilmeier G, Brusselmans K, Cornelissen I, Ehler E, Kakkar VV, Stalmans I, Mattot V, Perriard JC, Dewerchin M, Flameng W, Nagy A, Lupu F, Moons L, Collen D, D'amore PA, Shima DT. Impaired myocardial angiogenesis and ischemic cardiomyopathy in mice lacking the vascular endothelial growth factor isoforms VEGF164 and VEGF188. Nat Med. 1999; 5: 495–502.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. de Boer RA, Pinto YM, van Veldhuisen DJ. The imbalance between oxygen demand and supply as a potential mechanism in the pathophysiology of heart failure: the role of microvascular growth and abnormalities. Microcirculation. 2003; 10: 113–126.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Kaminski K, Podewski E, Bonda T, Schaefer A, Sliwa K, Forster O, Quint A, Landmesser U, Doerries C, Luchtefeld M, Poli V, Schneider MD, Balligand JL, Desjardins F, Ansari A, Struman I, Nguyen NQ, Zschemisch NH, Klein G, Heusch G, Schulz R, Hilfiker A, Drexler H. A cathepsin D-cleaved 16 kDa form of prolactin mediates postpartum cardiomyopathy. Cell. 2007; 128: 589–600.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Urbich C, Kuehbacher A, Dimmeler S. Role of microRNAs in vascular diseases, inflammation, and angiogenesis. Cardiovasc Res. 2008; 79: 581–588.
30. Fish JE, Santoro MM, Morton SU, Yu S, Yeh RF, Wythe JD, Ivey KN, Bruneau BG, Stainier DY, Srivastava D. miR-126 regulates angiogenic signaling and vascular integrity. Dev Cell. 2008; 15: 272–284.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Wang S, Aurora AB, Johnson BA, Qi X, McAnally J, Hill JA, Richardson JA, Bassel-Duby R, Olson EN. The endothelial-specific microRNA miR-126 governs vascular integrity and angiogenesis. Dev Cell. 2008; 15: 261–271.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. van Rooij E, Sutherland LB, Thatcher JE, DiMaio M, Naseem RH, Marshall WS, Hill JA, Olson EN. Dysregulation of microRNAs after myocardial infarction reveals a role of miR-29 in cardiac fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105: 13027–13032.
33. Martin MM, Lee EJ, Buckenberger JA, Schmittgen TD, Elton TS. MicroRNA-155 regulates human angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression in fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 2006; 28: 18277–18284.
34. Martin MM, Buckenberger JA, Jiang J, Malana GE, Nuovo GJ, Chotani M, Feldman DS, Schmittgen TD, Elton TS. The human angiotensin II type 1 receptor +1166 A/C polymorphism attenuates microrna-155 binding. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282: 24262–24269.
35. Romero DG, Plonczynski MW, Carvajal CA, Gomez-Sanchez EP, Gomez-Sanchez CE. Microribonucleic acid-21 increases aldosterone secretion and proliferation in H295R human adrenocortical cells. Endocrinology. 2008; 149: 2477–2483.
36. Nass RD, Aiba T, Tomaselli GF, Akar FG. Mechanisms of disease: ion channel remodeling in the failing ventricle. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008; 5: 196–207.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Accili EA, Proenza C, Baruscotti M, DiFrancesco D. From funny current to HCN channels: 20 years of excitation. News Physiol Sci. 2002; 17: 32–37.
38. Zicha S, Fernandez-Velasco M, Lonardo G, L'Heureux N, Nattel S. Sinus node dysfunction and hyperpolarization-activated (HCN) channel subunit remodeling in a canine heart failure model. Cardiovasc Res. 2005; 66: 472–481.
39. Luo X, Lin H, Pan Z, Xiao J, Zhang Y, Lu Y, Yang B, Wang Z. Downregulation of MIRNA-1/MIRNA-133 contributes to re-expression of pacemaker channel genes HCN2 and HCN4 in hypertrophic heart. J Biol Chem. 2008; 284: 20045–20052.
40. Samie FH, Berenfeld O, Anumonwo J, Mironov SF, Udassi S, Beaumont J, Taffet S, Pertsov AM, Jalife J. Rectification of the background potassium current: a determinant of rotor dynamics in ventricular fibrillation. Circ Res. 2001; 89: 1216–1223.
41. Zhang H, Garratt CJ, Zhu J, Holden AV. Role of up-regulation of IK1 in action potential shortening associated with atrial fibrillation in humans. Cardiovasc Res. 2005; 66: 493–502.
42. Blower PE, Verducci JS, LIN S, Zhou J, Chung JH, Dai Z, Liu CG, Reinhold W, Lorenzi PL, Kaldjian EP, Croce CM, Weinstein JN, Sadee W. MicroRNA expression profiles for the NCI-60 cancer cell panel. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007; 6: 1483–1491.
43. Salter KH, Acharya CR, Walters KS, Redman R, Anguiano A, Garman KS, Anders CK, Mukherjee S, Dressman HK, Barry WT, Marcom KP, Olson J, Nevins JR, Potti A. An integrated approach to the prediction of chemotherapeutic response in patients with breast cancer. PLoS ONE. 2008; 3: e1908.[CrossRef]
44. Krutzfeldt J, Kuwajima S, Braich R, Rajeev KG, Pena J, Tuschl T, Manoharan M, Stoffel M. Specificity, duplex degradation and subcellular localization of antagomirs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35: 2885–2892.
45. Krutzfeldt J, Rajewsky N, Braich R, Rajeev KG, Tuschl T, Manoharan M, Stoffel M. Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with antagomirs. Nature. 2005; 438: 685–689.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Xiao JN, Yang BF, Lin HX, Lu YJ, Luo XB, Wang ZG. Novel approaches for gene-specific interference manipulating actions of via microRNAS: examination on the pacemaker channel genes HCN2 and HCN4. J Cell Physiol. 2007; 212: 285–292.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Liang, Y. Liu, D. Mladinov, A. W. Cowley Jr., H. Trivedi, Y. Fang, X. Xu, X. Ding, and Z. Tian MicroRNA: a new frontier in kidney and blood pressure research Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2009; 297(3): F553 - F558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nam, M. Li, K. Choi, C. Balch, S. Kim, and K. P. Nephew MicroRNA and mRNA integrated analysis (MMIA): a web tool for examining biological functions of microRNA expression Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2009; 37(suppl_2): W356 - W362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. van Rooij and E. N. Olson Searching for MiR-acles in Cardiac Fibrosis Circ. Res., January 30, 2009; 104(2): 138 - 140. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. McMurray, M. Petrie, K. Swedberg, M. Komajda, S. Anker, and R. Gardner CHAPTER 23 Heart Failure ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |