doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.180588
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.
Reviews |
Cardiogenic Differentiation and Transdifferentiation of Progenitor Cells
From the Center for Cardiovascular Biology (H.R., E.M., W.-Z.Z., M.A.L.), Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine; and Departments of Pathology (H.R., W.-Z.Z., M.A.L.) and Medicine/Cardiology (E.M.), University of Washington, Seattle.
Correspondence to Michael A. Laflamme, MD, PhD, Department of Pathology, Center for Cardiovascular Biology, Institute for Stem Cell & Regenerative Medicine, University of Washington, 815 Mercer St, Seattle, WA 98109. E-mail laflamme{at}u.washington.edu
This Review is part of a thematic series on Cellular Therapy, which includes the following articles:
The Stem Cell Movement [2008;102:1155–1168] Aging and Disease as Modifiers of Efficacy of Cell Therapy [2008;102:1319–1330]
Genetic Enhancement of Stem Cell Engraftment, Survival, and Efficacy [2008;102:1471–1482]
Cardiogenic Differentiation and Transdifferentiation of Progenitor Cells
Paracrine Signaling in Cell Transplantation
Assessment and Optimization of Cell Engraftment After Transplantation
Stem Cell Homing to Sites of Injury
Regulatory Considerations in Cell Transplantation
Eduardo Marbán Editor
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionStem Cells and the...Evidence for Cardiomyocyte...Bone Marrow-Derived Stem CellsResident Cardiac Stem CellsStem Cells in the...Cell-Based Cardiac Repair With...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
In recent years, cell transplantation has drawn tremendous interest as a novel approach to preserving or even restoring contractile function to infarcted hearts. A typical human infarct involves the loss of approximately 1 billion cardiomyocytes, and, therefore, many investigators have sought to identify endogenous or exogenous stem cells with the capacity to differentiate into committed cardiomyocytes and repopulate lost myocardium. As a result of these efforts, dozens of stem cell types have been reported to have cardiac potential. These include pluripotent embryonic stem cells, as well various adult stem cells resident in compartments including bone marrow, peripheral tissues, and the heart itself. Some of these cardiogenic progenitors have been reported to contribute replacement muscle through endogenous reparative processes or via cell transplantation in preclinical cardiac injury models. However, considerable disagreement exists regarding the efficiency and even the reality of cardiac differentiation by many of these stem cell types, making these issues a continuing source of controversy in the field. In this review, we consider approaches to cell fate mapping and establishing the cardiac phenotype, as well as the present state of the evidence for the cardiogenic and regenerative potential of the major candidate stem cell types.
Key Words: stem cell • progenitor • myogenesis • cardiomyocyte • myocardial infarct
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionStem Cells and the...Evidence for Cardiomyocyte...Bone Marrow-Derived Stem CellsResident Cardiac Stem CellsStem Cells in the...Cell-Based Cardiac Repair With...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
In L. Frank Baum’s classic novel The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, the title character is only able to provide the Tin Woodman with a placebo heart made of velvet and filled with sawdust. One century later, the emerging field of regenerative medicine aspires to accomplish what Oz could not, that is, harness the potential of stem cells to build (or rebuild) heart tissue out of its component parts. Modern medical management has greatly improved the prospects for heart failure patients, but the only clinically available means of replacing lost myocardium remains whole-organ transplantation. The demand by patients with end-stage heart failure greatly exceeds the supply of suitable donor hearts, and so there has been considerable recent interest in cell-based therapies as an alternate means of "remuscularizing" injured hearts.
Valuable proof of principle for cell-based cardiac repair was provided by early preclinical studies in which terminally differentiated cardiomyocytes from fetal and neonatal sources were transplanted into infarcted rodent hearts, resulting in improved left ventricular function.1–3 The transplanted cells retained their cardiac phenotype, including expression of sarcomeric proteins and formation of intercalated disc structures. Subsequent intravital imaging studies have confirmed the systolic activation of such grafts in both uninjured4 and infarcted4,5 hearts, demonstrating that the nascent myocardium is capable of appropriate electromechanical integration. Thus, although recent work has taught us that cell therapy can also improve ventricular function by indirect ("paracrine") mechanisms (for a review, see elsewhere11), cardiogenic cell therapies offer the potential advantage of adding force-generating units to infarcted hearts that have lost muscle to scar tissue.
The clinical application of fetal and neonatal cardiomyocytes for cardiac repair is precluded by their limited supply and ethical concerns, and so the field has sought to identify other cardiogenic cell sources. We are pleased to report that there has been considerable recent progress, and cell-based cardiac repair has become a mainstream experimental concept with multiple clinical trials underway. At the same time, this field has witnessed a significant degree of controversy, particularly with regard to the capacity of certain unexpected stem cell types to differentiate into cardiomyocytes. In the present review, we begin by discussing techniques for demonstrating the cardiac potential of a candidate stem cell type and potential pitfalls in this phenotyping. We then consider a variety of reportedly cardiogenic stem cell types, both endogenous and exogenous, and evaluate the evidence in support of such claims and the prospects of each in cardiac repair.
|
Stem Cells and the Cardiac Phenotype: Definitions, Methods, and Potential Artifacts |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionStem Cells and the...Evidence for Cardiomyocyte...Bone Marrow-Derived Stem CellsResident Cardiac Stem CellsStem Cells in the...Cell-Based Cardiac Repair With...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Stem cells are clonogenic cells capable of both self-renewal and differentiation into more specialized progeny. Traditionally, they have been divided into 2 broad categories: adult stem cells and embryonic stem cells (ESCs). Adult stem cells are derived from postnatal somatic tissues and are generally considered to be multipotent, meaning they can give rise to multiple differentiated cell types. ESCs, derived from the inner cell mass of blastocyst-stage embryos, are pluripotent, meaning they can, in principle, give rise to all the differentiated cell types of the postnatal organism. Differentiated somatic cell types can also be reprogrammed into a pluripotent state similar to ESCs via forced expression of stem cell–related genes, the basis for the recently reported induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).6
Cardiac differentiation has been reported for a variety of stem cell types, including both expected and unexpected cell types. Because reports of differentiation into unexpected cell fates (ie, "transdifferentiation" events) continue to be a source of controversy, it is worth considering the experimental techniques for tracing cell fate as well as associated potential pitfalls. In principle, tracing cell fate is straightforward and simply requires that one evaluate 2 parameters, the lineage (or "ancestry") of any given cell and its phenotype at the time of evaluation. In practice, the challenges to determining each of these parameters and then rigorously demonstrating their colocalization within a single cell are often underestimated. Table 1 lists potential approaches to establishing the cardiac potential of a candidate progenitor cell type, as well as the major pros and cons of each approach. Although not always possible, the use of multiple techniques is the most convincing way to demonstrate cardiac potential.
|
Tracing the lineage of putative cardiogenic progenitor cells is especially treacherous in experimental designs that involve the culture of admixed cells, coculture with definitive cardiomyocytes, or in vivo transplantation studies. Two artifacts can confound such experiments: transfer of labels to neighboring cells7–10 and heterotypic cell fusion.11–15 The first of these artifacts is best avoided by the use of indelible (eg, genetic) cell lineage markers whenever possible. Although even transgenes or transgene products have been reported to be exchanged between cultured cells under certain conditions,16,17 chemical labels (eg, bromodeoxyuridine [BrdUrd], fluorescent cell tracker dyes, and fluorescent or iron-labeled particles) are known to be readily exchanged between cocultured cells and between graft and host following transplantation.8,10 This is a particular concern in the context of myocardial infarction, which involves brisk infiltration by phagocytic cells that are capable of taking up both label and necrotic cardiomyocyte debris. As pointed out by our group and others,7,18 such transfer can be difficult or impossible to resolve at the light microscopic level.
Heterotypic cell fusion is a process whereby a donor and host cell merge, resulting in a fused cell with the genetic information of both cells, including any genetic marker (eg, green fluorescent protein [GFP] expression) from the donor cells. Although cell fusion is generally considered to be a rare phenomenon, it can be augmented by inflammation, which predominates in the context of myocardial infarction or allotransplantation. The fusion event can result in a binucleated cell, a mononucleated cell with a single tetraploid synkaryon, or potentially even a karyotypically normal cell (if a fusion event is followed by reductive division in which an entire set of paired chromosomes is lost19). Thus, to most convincingly exclude cell fusion in coculture and transplantation experiments, investigators should supplement cytogenetic analysis with the use of separate genetic lineage markers to track donor and graft cells (eg, transplantation of GFP+ cells into a β-galactosidase–expressing recipient or the Cre-lox recombination system, discussed in more detail below). Such precautions are not always possible, but they have been successfully used by multiple groups13,14,20,21 and should be regarded as the standard, particularly when asserting cardiac potential for unexpected stem cell types.
Demonstrating an unambiguous cardiac phenotype can also be a challenge. The most common approach is to show the expression of 1 or more cardiac-"specific" markers by immunocytochemistry or RT-PCR. In reality, there is no single absolutely specific cardiac marker, and so this approach requires the judicious selection of multiple markers and appropriate controls. (Table 2 lists commonly used markers as well as the noncardiac cell types in which they are also reportedly expressed.) Ideally, such phenotyping by cardiac markers is accompanied by functional assays, such as action potential recordings or fluorescent calcium imaging.
|
|
Evidence for Cardiomyocyte Repopulation in Postnatal Hearts |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionStem Cells and the...Evidence for Cardiomyocyte...Bone Marrow-Derived Stem CellsResident Cardiac Stem CellsStem Cells in the...Cell-Based Cardiac Repair With...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Until quite recently, it was accepted dogma that cardiogenesis was limited to the developing heart in mammalian organisms. This conventional view held that postnatal cardiac expansion under physiological or pathological conditions results from cardiomyocyte hypertrophy rather than via hyperplasia or recruitment of cardiac precursors. The pendulum has now swung the opposite direction, and a new paradigm has been proposed wherein there may be several resident and extracardiac progenitor cell populations that respond to cardiac injury by cell division and subsequent differentiation into functional cardiomyocytes.
The degree to which such progenitors contribute to the renewal of adult myocardium is a source of considerable controversy. In our opinion, one of the most important advances in this area was reported recently by Hsieh et al, and we regard their study as a benchmark to evaluate findings by others in this evolving field of research.22 In their elegant fate-mapping study, these authors addressed 2 critical questions using mouse models of normal aging and cardiac injury. First, is there significant replacement of cardiomyocytes during normal aging? Second, do endogenous progenitor cells significantly contribute to the replacement of adult mammalian cardiomyocytes after injury?
Figure 1 illustrates the design and readout of the genetic pulse–chase labeling experiments of the authors. In brief, they generated a cardiac-restricted, inducible reporter mouse model by crossing 2 transgenic strains: the Z/EG reporter mouse in which constitutive β-galactosidase expression is replaced by the expression of GFP on the removal of a loxP-flanked stop sequence by Cre recombinase; and a second transgenic mouse in which the cardiomyocyte-specific 
-myosin heavy chain (MHC) promoter drives expression of a tamoxifen-activated form of Cre recombinase (MerCreMer). In theory, treatment of the resulting MerCreMer-ZEG mice with tamoxifen at a given time point (the "pulse") should result in 100% of cardiomyocytes switching from expression of β-galactosidase to GFP (ie, a "blue" to "green" switch). In reality, repeated dosing resulted in 
80% cardiomyocytes, making the blue-to-green switch, whereas the remaining 20% did not (ie, an 80%:20% ratio). The authors also performed appropriate control experiments to ensure the fidelity of their readout (eg, confirming its reliable inducibility in cardiomyocytes and low leakiness in noncardiomyocytes) and to exclude cell fusion.
|
Their model assumes that cardiomyogenic precursors would not be labeled by the tamoxifen pulse because the MHC promoter should not be active in these presumably primitive cells. Thus, after a tamoxifen pulse and blue-to-green recombination in cardiomyocytes, any subsequent repopulation of cardiomyocytes from the unlabeled pool of progenitors would decrease the fraction of GFP-expressing ("green") cardiomyocytes. In fact, during normal aging, the ratio of green/blue cardiomyocytes remained stable at 80%:20%, indicating that no repopulation had occurred. By contrast, by 3 months following infarction, the mice showed a significant increase in the percentage of blue cardiomyocytes, resulting in a 65%:35% ratio of green-to-blue cardiomyocytes. This finding indicated that newly differentiated cardiomyocytes (blue because they have not undergone Cre-mediated recombination) had been recruited from the progenitor pool after the tamoxifen pulse. In important control experiments, the authors detected a similar frequency of cell death in β-galactosidase–expressing and GFP-expressing cardiomyocytes, ruling out the preferential death of GFP+ cardiomyocytes.
In sum, although Hsieh et al did not find significant cardiac repopulation to occur during normal aging, their study is arguably the best evidence supporting cardiomyocyte repopulation, albeit modest, by endogenous progenitors following injury. At present, the phenotype and anatomic location of the cardiomyogenic progenitors implicated in their study remains undetermined. The authors observed that the cardiomyocyte repopulation following injury coincided with an increase in the number of intramyocardial cells expressing c-Kit (reported to be a marker of resident cardiac stem cells,23,24 as discussed below), but such data are only correlative. In the following sections, we consider some of the reportedly cardiogenic adult stem cell types that may underlie the endogenous cardiac repopulation demonstrated by Hsieh et al, as well as those that could contribute new muscle as an exogenous cell-based therapy. (Please see Figure 2.) We have organized this discussion by the 3 compartments in which these candidate cell types reside: the bone marrow, the heart itself (so-called resident cardiac stem cells), and peripheral tissues (either circulating or in the stroma).
|
|
Bone Marrow–Derived Stem Cells |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionStem Cells and the...Evidence for Cardiomyocyte...Bone Marrow-Derived Stem CellsResident Cardiac Stem CellsStem Cells in the...Cell-Based Cardiac Repair With...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Approximately 1 decade ago, a number of studies challenged the long-held view that adult stem cells could give rise to only a restricted set of differentiated cell types. These reports described "transdifferentiation" events, wherein adult stem cells differentiated into unexpected cell types, even across embryonic germ layer boundaries (eg, neural stem cells giving rise to hematopoietic cell types). Although we now understand that many of these apparent transdifferentiation events actually resulted from technical artifacts and/or previously overlooked phenomena, such as cell fusion and "ectopic" stem cells (eg, hematopoietic stem cells resident in skeletal muscle),11,12 the possibility that bone marrow–derived stem cells might contribute to cardiac repair generated tremendous excitement. Importantly, the bone marrow is a very heterogenous compartment and contains multiple stem cell populations with putative cardiac potential (eg, hematopoietic stem cells [HSCs],25 mesenchymal stem cells [MSCs],26–32 very small embryonic-like stem cells,33 multipotent adult progenitor cells,34 etc). We focus here on those marrow-derived progenitors that have drawn the most attention by the field.
Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Interest in the cardiac potential of HSCs was stirred by animal studies in which donor-derived cells were identified in the hearts of bone marrow transplant recipients. In 1 such study, Jackson et al35 isolated an enriched population of HSCs (so-called side population or "SP" cells) from the bone marrow of transgenic mice that constitutively express β-galactosidase (LacZ+). They used these LacZ+ donor cells to repopulate the marrow of an irradiated wild-type recipient, which later underwent myocardial infarction by coronary ligation. Histological evaluation of the infarcted myocardium 4 weeks later revealed 0.02% of cardiomyocytes (and 3.3% of endothelial cells) to be LacZ+, indicating them to be donor-derived.
A subsequent study by Orlic et al reported a remarkable degree of regeneration following direct injection of HSCs in a mouse infarct model.25 These authors reported that the transplantation of lineage-null, c-Kit+ bone marrow stem cells from GFP-expressing transgenic mice into infarcted hearts resulted in the formation of nascent GFP+ myocardium that, on average, occupied more than two-thirds of the infarct zone by 9 days posttransplantation. This impressive myocardial regeneration was accompanied by improved myocardial function and attenuated adverse ventricular remodeling.
A number of subsequent studies have failed to confirm the findings of the preceding authors. Murry et al isolated HSCs using techniques similar to those of Orlic et al and used 2 transgenic mice strains as donors: mice constitutively expressing GFP and those in which the cardiac-specific -MHC promoter drives expression of a nuclear targeted β-galactosidase (such that only cardiomyocytes show LacZ+ nuclei, thereby providing a convenient means of following both lineage and phenotype).36 After direct intracardiac injection into infarcted wild-type recipients, Murry et al were unable to find even a single donor-derived cardiomyocyte. In independent studies, both the Robbins37 and the Jacobsen13 laboratories were also unable to find bone marrow–derived cardiomyocytes following transplantation in murine infarct models. More recently, Rubart and colleagues used intravital imaging techniques to examine the functionality of bone marrow–derived cells following transplantation into infarcted hearts. These authors found that whereas host cardiomyocytes exhibited the expected cyclic calcium transients, the graft cells did not. This indicated that the graft cells had not achieved a functional cardiac phenotype.38
Some (but not all) of these discrepancies regarding the cardiogenic potential of bone marrow–derived stem cells can perhaps be attributed to the previously described phenomenon of cell fusion. Using the Cre-lox recombination system, Alvarez-Dolado et al showed that cell fusion accounted for the appearance of donor-derived parenchymal cells in a variety of tissues, including heart, following bone marrow transplantation.12 Indeed, the frequency of fused cells observed by Alvarez-Dolado closely approximates the frequency of donor-derived cells found by Jackson et al35 and observed in studies by our group and others examining human recipients of gender-mismatched transplants (in which Y-chromosome in situ hybridization was used to determine cell origin).39,40
Nonetheless, the cardiac potential of HSCs remains controversial. The authors of the original study by Orlic et al recently revisited this issue and again concluded that c-Kit+ bone marrow cells transdifferentiated following transplantation in a mouse infarct model and formed extensive replacement myocardium.41 In this study, Rota et al extended their original work to include the use of graft cells with both constitutive and cardiac-specific genetic reporters, Y-chromosome in situ hybridization (to exclude cell fusion, at least in the absence of reductive division), and intravital imaging studies. Although this extensive study strengthens the case for HSC transdifferentiation, challenges to selected aspects of this work immediately followed,38 indicating the debate is likely to continue.
Mesenchymal Stem Cells
MSCs are another well-characterized multipotent stem cell type that can be isolated from the bone marrow compartment. As typically prepared, MSCs are a fairly heterogenous cell population, but they generally express markers including Sca-1, CD29, CD44, CD81, and CD106 in the mouse42 and CD29, CD44, CD71, CD90, CD106, CD120a, and CD124 in humans.43 MSCs differentiate into adipocyte, chondrocyte, and osteogenic phenotypes under specific media conditions,43 and they can mediate immunomodulatory actions that help them avoid rejection after allotransplantation.44
The capacity of MSCs to differentiate into mesodermal lineages generated considerable interest in exploring the potential of these cells for cardiogenic differentiation and infarct repair. Makino et al26 observed that the exposure of immortalized murine MSCs to 5-aza-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC), an inhibitor of DNA methylation previously reported to promote the differentiation of pluripotent P19 embryonal carcinoma cells, resulted in the appearance of spontaneously beating foci. The cardiac phenotype of the treated cells was confirmed by a variety of techniques including RT-PCR (for markers including atrial natriuretic peptide [ANP], myosin light chain-2a [MLC2a] and -2v [MLC2v], GATA4, and Nkx2.5), immunocytochemistry (for markers including sarcomeric MHC and -actinin), electron microscopy, and electrophysiology (cardiac-type action potentials). Although similar findings with 5-aza-dC have been reported by others,27 some have suggested that this cardiac induction may require "immortalized" MSCs.45
Safety concerns regarding 5-aza-dC led to interest in alternative, more targeted approaches to inducing cardiogenic differentiation by MSCs. Shim et al28 isolated MSCs from the bone marrow of human patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery and treated the cells with insulin, dexamethasone, and ascorbic acid. The authors reported that the treated cells immunostained positively for - and β-MHC and GATA4 but not for skeletal muscle markers such as skeletal MHC and MyoD. However, the efficiency of cardiogenesis by this approach appeared fairly low. The resultant "cardiomyocyte-like" cultures lacked appreciable spontaneous contractile activity, and only a small subset exhibited -actinin–positive cross-striations. More recently, Shiota et al have reported the cardiac induction of MSC-like progenitors derived via a complex culturing protocol involving the formation of spheres of marrow-derived adherent cells.46 After treatment with 5-aza-dC, the spheres showed spontaneous beating activity, as well as immunoreactivity for cardiac markers including Nkx2.5 and MLC2v. The authors tested the capacity of these preparations to mediate cardiac repair in murine infarct model. They reported functional improvements following the transplantation of GFP-tagged, sphere-derived cells, but the degree of remuscularization was extremely low (7 donor-derived cardiomyocytes per heart.)
The latter study is but 1 of many preclinical studies asserting beneficial effects on contractile function following the transplantation of MSCs in models of cardiac injury. Some27,29,32 but not all47 of these studies have concluded that MSCs transdifferentiate into cardiomyocytes in vivo. Reports favoring myocardial repopulation by MSCs have generally shown only rare clusters of cells that lack a typical cardiomyocyte morphology but immunostained positively for 1 or more cardiac markers. Moreover, an important caveat with regard to the previously cited studies is that they used transferable chemical markers (such as BrdUrd), rather than a more indelible lineage marker to distinguish graft from host. Indeed, when Fazel et al31 transplanted MSCs isolated from a constitutively β-galactosidase–expressing mouse, they observed functional benefits but no LacZ+ cardiomyocytes.
Some insights into how MSCs might improve contractile function without directly repopulating the myocardium can be gleaned from an interesting series of studies by Dzau and colleagues.20,48–50 Taken together, the latter work suggests that MSCs have limited cardiogenic potential but considerable promise in cell-based therapies via indirect ("paracrine") effects on cardiac repair. These authors compared the consequences of transplanting MSCs overexpressing the prosurvival gene Akt1 to those obtained with control (ie, β-galactosidase–expressing) MSCs in a rat infarct model. They found that the transplantation of Akt-expressing cells was far more efficacious, inhibiting adverse remodeling, inflammation, fibrosis, and cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, while completely normalizing cardiac function.48 Moreover, these effects did not appear mediated by cardiomyocyte repopulation, because studies using the Cre-lox recombination system revealed only rare MSC-derived cardiomyocytes, nearly all of which resulted from cell fusion.20 Similar favorable effects were mediated by the injection of either medium conditioned by Akt-overexpressing MSCs49 or secreted frizzled-related protein 2 (SFRP-2), a soluble Wnt antagonist released by these cells,51 implicating a paracrine mechanism of action.
|
Resident Cardiac Stem Cells |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionStem Cells and the...Evidence for Cardiomyocyte...Bone Marrow-Derived Stem CellsResident Cardiac Stem CellsStem Cells in the...Cell-Based Cardiac Repair With...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Side Population Cells
Hierlihy et al was the first to isolate side population (SP) cells from heart tissue using Hoechst 33342 dye exclusion, a technique previously developed to enrich resident progenitor cells from bone marrow and other organs.52 Hoechst dye exclusion in primitive cells is conferred by the expression of various ATP-binding cassette (ABC) membrane transporters, such as those encoded by the multidrug resistance (MDR) genes. Hierlihy et al found that cells with the SP phenotype comprised
1% of all cells in the mouse heart, but they did not examine their cardiogenic potential. Martin et al53 isolated cardiac SP cells from adult GFP+ mice and cocultured the latter cells with cardiac main population cells from wild-type mice. After 14 days, an unspecified fraction of the GFP+ SP-derived cells immunostained for the striated muscle marker -actinin; however, it should be noted that the antibody used does not distinguish between cardiac and skeletal forms of -actinin.
In 2005, Pfister et al21 described a subpopulation of murine cardiac SP cells that expresses the stem cell marker Sca-1 but is negative for the endothelial marker CD31. These cells comprised 10% of the total SP cells (500 to 1000 cells per adult mouse heart). By RT-PCR, it was shown that the CD31–/Sca1+ SP cells expressed Nkx2.5, GATA4, smooth muscle -actin, and desmin but not -actinin or -MHC. After 2 to 3 weeks of coculture with adult rat ventricular cardiomyocytes, it appeared that the SP cells had adopted a more mature cardiac phenotype, as evidenced by positive immunostaining for -actinin, connexin43, and troponin I. These cells also exhibited contractions and calcium transients in response to field stimulation. Cell fusion was excluded by coculture experiments using 2 separate genetic lineage markers and the Cre-lox recombination system.
Oyama et al reported that they could induce the cardiac differentiation of SP cells from neonatal rat hearts without coculture, by treating the cells with either oxytocin or the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A.54 They also found that GFP-tagged SP cells homed to cryoinjured hearts following intravenous infusion. GFP+ cardiomyocytes were observed in the injured hearts (comprising 4.4% of all cells), but cell fusion was not excluded.
Although we look forward to more definitive transplantation studies with cardiac SP cells, the in vivo response of endogenous SP cells to cardiac injury also remains a source of some uncertainty. On the one hand, Martin et al reported that the number of cardiac SP cells increased following cryoinjury in the mouse heart.55 By contrast, Mouquet et al observed an acute decrease in the number of cardiac SP cells in a mouse model of permanent coronary occlusion, followed by a gradual increase to baseline levels by 7 days postinfarction (via proliferation of resident cardiac SP cells and homing of bone marrow derived SP cells).56 At present, we can only speculate that the apparent discrepancies in SP cell dynamics between the 2 studies result from the differing modes of cardiac injury.
c-Kit+ Cells
In 2003, Beltrami et al reported a population of resident cardiac progenitors in adult rat heart that were identified by their expression of the surface antigen and stem cell marker, c-Kit.23 Although rare overall (1 c-Kit+ cell per 104 total myocardial cells), histological analysis revealed these cells to be located in small clusters within the interstitium of the ventricular and atrial myocardium with a higher density in the atria and the ventricular apex. Cardiac c-Kit+ cells were found to be self-renewing, clonogenic, and multipotent, differentiating into cardiomyocytes, smooth muscle, and endothelial cells. Whereas their differentiated progeny remained quite immature in vitro (ie, lacking structural organization, identifiable sarcomeres, and contractile activity), this was in stark contrast to their in vivo capabilities. By 20 days following transplantation into the infarct border zone of syngeneic rats, BrdUrd-labeled c-Kit+ cells had colonized the infarcted area and appeared to have matured with expression of sarcomeric proteins (cardiac MHC), cross-striations, and connexin43-positive intercalated discs. Morphometric analyses revealed that the injected cells had given rise to 13x106 new cardiomyocytes, corresponding to a 65-fold increase from the day of injection. This was accompanied by an increase in vascular density with incorporation of the graft cells. Similarly impressive cardiac regeneration and functional improvements by echocardiography were reported after the intracoronary infusion of c-Kit+ cardiac stem cells in both rat and canine infarct models.57 More recently, these investigators have reported the isolation and expansion of c-Kit+ cells from human surgical specimens.24
The significance of these findings would be far-reaching, but it remains to be seen whether this success can be reproduced in the target population of patients with ischemic heart disease. Other adult stem cell populations are known to be reduced with advanced age and/or disease; indeed, a recent study by Pouly et al failed to demonstrate c-Kit+ resident stem cells in endomyocardial biopsies from typical human patients.58
Sca-1+ Cells
Oh et al reported the existence of resident cardiac progenitor cells in the adult mouse heart that express stem cell antigen-1 (Sca-1) but not c-Kit.14 A small percentage of Sca-1+ cells expressed cardiac-specific genes like Nkx2.5 and sarcomeric proteins after treatment with the demethylating agent 5-aza-dC, but no spontaneous beating activity was observed. Following intravenous infusion in a mouse infarct model, Sca-1+ cells homed to injured myocardium, where they appeared to have differentiated into cardiomyocytes in the border zone with expression of sarcomeric -actin, cardiac troponin I, and connexin 43. These authors used the Cre-lox recombination system to distinguish cell fusion from direct incorporation and concluded that each accounted for 50% of the apparently donor-derived cells.
Matsuura et al also reported the isolation of Sca-1 cells from adult murine hearts.59 Although 5-aza-dC failed to induce cardiac differentiation in their hands, they found that oxytocin resulted in a small fraction (1%) of Sca-1+ cells exhibiting spontaneous beating activity and expression of sarcomeric -actin, cardiac troponin I, Nkx2.5, and MHC. More recently, Wang et al reported that Sca-1+ cells from the mouse heart could be induced to express cardiac markers by treatment with 5-aza-dC, fibroblast growth factor-4, fibroblast growth factor-8, and the Wnt antagonist Dickkopf-1.60 These authors also transplanted Sca-1+/CD31– cells into the acutely infarcted mouse heart and found that this intervention attenuated the progressive functional decline, while promoting angiogenesis and resulting in "modest" cardiomyocyte repopulation (ie, LacZ+ cardiomyocytes that immunostained with troponin T, -sarcomeric actin, and N-cadherin). Unfortunately, the authors did not determine the frequency of such cardiomyocytes or perform experiments to exclude cell fusion.60
Because humans do not have the Sca-1 gene,61 it is unclear how an "orthologous" population of progenitors would be isolated from the human heart.
Cardiospheres
In 2004, Messina et al described a novel isolation technique for resident cardiac progenitors from murine hearts, as well as subcultures of human atrial or ventricular specimens.62 Mild enzymatic digestion of the tissue specimens yielded small, round, phase-bright cells that clustered together in suspension. These sphere-generating cells were then allowed to adhere on poly-L-lysine–coated plates and cultured in a media enriched with cytokines (epidermal growth factor, basic fibroblast growth factor, cardiotrophin-1, thrombin). These "cardiosphere" (or CS)-derived cells were self-renewing, clonogenic, and expressed both endothelial (KDR in human, flk-1 in mouse cells, and CD31) and stem cell markers (CD34, c-Kit, Sca-1). Mouse CS-derived cells showed spontaneous contractile activity, whereas human CS cells did so only after 24 hours of coculture with postnatal rat cardiomyocytes. CS-cells from both human and mouse demonstrated trilineage differentiation into cardiomyocytes and endothelial and smooth muscle cells; however, quantitative data as to the frequency of these events were not reported. CS-derived cardiomyocytes expressed cardiac markers including cardiac troponin I, ANP, and cardiac MHC. In vivo, CS-derived cells were reported to regenerate the infarcted mouse heart.62
Subsequently, Smith et al expanded on these findings by isolating CS-forming cells from human biopsy specimens.63 The human cardiospheres, which were successfully isolated from 69 of 70 biopsies attempted, consistently expressed c-Kit but not the multidrug resistance gene MDR1, indicating that these cells were phenotypically distinct from the resident cardiac progenitors previously identified in situ (c-Kit+, MDR1+).64,65 Consistent with findings by Messina et al,62 human CS-derived cells did not spontaneously contract, but coculture with neonatal rat cardiomyocytes evoked calcium transients in synchrony with neighboring cardiomyocytes, action potentials, and fast inward sodium current. Smith et al also injected lentivirally transduced LacZ+ human CS-derived cells into the border zone of infarcted SCID-beige mice.63 Twenty days later, the CS-derived cells were found throughout border regions of the mouse heart, and occasional donor cells immunostained for -sarcomeric actin and von Willebrand factor. Echocardiography showed improvements in global left ventricular function, but, given the apparently limited cardiomyocyte repopulation by LacZ+ cells, these functional effects were attributed to a combination of regeneration and paracrine effects.
Based on these studies, explant-derived cardiospheres appear to have cardiomyogenic potential and considerable promise for cardiac repair. However, a recent study by Shenje et al gives some reason for caution.7 These authors performed lineage tracing of cardiac explant-derived cells from a transgenic mouse with a highly sensitive cardiac reporter based on the Cre-lox recombination system (ie, MLC2v-Cre/ZEG mice, in which expression of GFP indicates cardiac differentiation). They observed the emergence of small, round, phase-bright cells as described by others,62,63 but they did not place these explant-derived cells in suspension cultures so as to form cardiospheres. Notwithstanding this important technical difference, the explant-derived cells characterized by Shenje et al had a perplexing phenotype in light of the preceding work. Their cells lacked expression of Sca-1, c-Kit, Nkx2.5, and ANP, and the sensitive MLC2v-Cre/ZEG genetic reporter was not activated. GFP+, sarcomeric actin-expressing explant-derived cells were observed, but these were convincingly shown by ultrastructural studies to result from phagocytosis of GFP-expressing myocytes, rather than activation of the reporter. (The latter finding underscores the challenge of colocalization studies at the light microscopic level when phagocytic cell types are present, a point that we have previously emphasized.18) Finally, the authors examined the functionality of these cells following transplantation with intravital imaging studies and found no evidence for calcium cycling by the graft.
Isl1+ Cells
Islet-1 (Isl1), a LIM homeodomain transcription factor, is expressed by progenitor cells of the secondary heart field, a structure present during early development that gives rise to the formation of the outflow tract, the atria, and the right ventricle. In 2005, Laugwitz et al showed that a population of Isl1+ cells persists in neonatal mouse hearts and that these cells express the cardiac transcription factors Nkx2.5 and GATA4, but not Sca-1, CD31, or c-kit.66 Isolated Isl1+ progenitor cells self-renew and maintain the ability to differentiate into functional cardiomyocytes in vitro and in vivo. Rare Isl1+ cells were identified in early postnatal rat, mouse, and human myocardium,66 but they may not be present in adult human heart.
|
Stem Cells in the Periphery and/or Circulation |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionStem Cells and the...Evidence for Cardiomyocyte...Bone Marrow-Derived Stem CellsResident Cardiac Stem CellsStem Cells in the...Cell-Based Cardiac Repair With...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Endothelial Progenitor Cells
Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are more properly viewed as both a circulating and a bone marrow stem cell type, because they are known to reside in both compartments. In 1997, Asahara and colleagues described the phenotype of EPCs, which proliferate in response to tissue ischemia, home to areas of injury, and either incorporate within or otherwise promote neovascularization.67,68 EPCs express markers including Flk-1, CD34, and CD133 and can differentiate into definitive endothelial cells.67,69–71 Initial interest in the application of EPCs to cardiac repair was naturally focused on their angiogenic properties.
The capacity of EPCs to transdifferentiate into cardiomyocytes was first reported by Dimmeler and colleagues in 2003.72 In their study, CD34+ human EPCs were obtained from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy adults or from patients with coronary artery disease. After coculture with neonatal rat cardiomyocytes, EPCs were reported to transdifferentiate into cardiomyocytes based on morphology, -sarcomeric actinin immunoreactivity by flow cytometry, and expression of other cardiac markers by immunostaining or RT-PCR with species-specific probes. Furthermore, the EPCs showed calcium transients that synchronized with adjacent rat cardiomyocytes, suggesting communication with the host myocardium by gap junctions. Coculture experiments with paraformaldehyde-fixed cardiomyocytes indicated that cell fusion was not required for EPCs to acquire the cardiac phenotype.72–75 Still, the efficiency of cardiac induction by EPCs was very low: even after enhancement with inhibition of Notch signaling, <1% of EPCs expressed -sarcomeric actinin.75 Asahara and colleagues reported even lower rates of in vitro cardiac transdifferentiation following coculture of EPCs with the rat heart–derived H9C2 cell line.76 The latter authors also reported the in vivo cardiac differentiation of a related preparation of human circulating cells following transplantation into a rodent infarct model. This conclusion is complicated, however, by the definite demonstration of cell fusion between host myocytes and graft cells, using species-specific fluorescent in situ hybridization probes.77
Moreover, Gruh et al were unable to confirm the in vitro cardiac differentiation of EPCs following coculture with primary myocytes.78 These authors detected no expression of human cardiac transcripts (in contrast to the previously discussed studies73–75), and they concluded that the rare, ostensibly transdifferentiated EPCs observed by FACS or epifluorescence microscopy were artifacts resulting from overlying cells and/or autofluorescence. Thus, although the cardiac potential of EPCs remains a source of controversy, this report by Gruh et al again underscores the challenges inherent to interpreting coculture experiments.
Other Postnatal Stem Cell Types With Reported Cardiogenic Potential
Several other post- (or peri)natal stem cell types have been reported to have cardiogenic potential, among which adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) and umbilical cord–derived stem cells (UCBSCs) are just 2 more extensively studied examples. In 2004, Planat-Benard et al reported the differentiation of spontaneously beating cells from ADSCs, albeit at a vanishingly low frequency (0.02 to 0.07%).79 Several cardiac markers were detected by RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry, and the cells exhibited "pacemaker-like" action potentials, but these action potentials had a strikingly brief duration that would be unusual even for primitive cardiomyocytes. Recently, Yamada et al reported a 10-fold higher yield of ADSCs from brown rather than white fat. Following transplantation in a mouse infarct model, brown fat ADSCs had dramatic beneficial functional effects and contributed to cardiac repopulation, but cell fusion was not excluded.80
The cardiogenic potential of UCBSCs remains controversial. On the 1 hand, 3 studies have described cardiomyogenic differentiation of UCBSCs in vivo81 and in vitro following 5-aza-dc treatment82 or coculture with fetal mouse cardiomyocytes.83 On the other hand, 2 groups independently concluded that UCBSCs home to infarcted rodent hearts after intravenous infusion and exert functional benefits without differentiating into cardiomyocytes.84,85
|
Cell-Based Cardiac Repair With Exogenous Pluripotent Stem Cells |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionStem Cells and the...Evidence for Cardiomyocyte...Bone Marrow-Derived Stem CellsResident Cardiac Stem CellsStem Cells in the...Cell-Based Cardiac Repair With...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
In this section, we consider the cardiogenic potential of pluripotent stem cells–cell types that are uninvolved in endogenous reparative mechanisms but may nonetheless prove useful as an exogenous cell therapy. Although the preclinical development of therapies with pluripotent stem cell types certainly lags that with adult stem cells, there has been a recent flurry of encouraging preclinical studies indicating functional efficacy with ESC-based cardiac repair.86–91 It is no coincidence that these encouraging developments are happening now: they reflect a decade "on the learning curve" with human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), as well as the application of recent insights from developmental biology. Given the recent reprogramming of human somatic cells into ESC-like pluripotent cells, it is becoming increasingly plausible to envision a "second generation" of cell-based cardiac therapies that will exploit the tremendous expandability and unquestioned cardiac potential of pluripotent stem cells.
Embryonic Stem Cells
ESCs are pluripotent cells derived from the inner cell mass of preimplantation-stage blastocysts. Murine ESCs were first isolated in 198192,93 and their human counterparts in 1998.94 ESCs from both species show similar features in culture. First, they can be propagated indefinitely as a stable, self-renewing population. Second, they have a pluripotent phenotype, meaning they can differentiate into cell types from all 3 primary germ layers both in vitro95 and in vivo.92–94 The latter property represents both an advantage and a disadvantage to the use of these cells: the intracardiac transplantation of undifferentiated ESCs or preparations of insufficiently purified ESC-derived cardiomyocytes results in teratoma formation.88,90,96 Because this would obviously be a disastrous outcome, the development of cell therapies based on pluripotent stem cells will require tight control of their differentiation into useful cell types.
Human ESC-derived cardiomyocytes (hESC-CMs) have an unambiguous cardiac phenotype by transcriptional, immunocytochemical, ultrastructural, and functional end points. They express expected cardiac markers, including cardiac-specific transcription factors (eg, Nkx2.5, GATA4, MEF2c, Tbx-5, and Tbx-20), sarcomeric proteins (eg, cardiac troponins I and T, sarcomeric MHCs and actins), and chamber-specific proteins (eg, ANP, MLC2V, and MLC2A).97–99 They exhibit spontaneous beating activity, characteristic cardiac ionic currents, and nodal-, atrial-, and ventricular-like action potentials.100,101
Historically, the most common method for deriving hESC-CMs in vitro has been via the formation of 3D aggregates, so-called embryoid bodies, and treating the cells with high serum to induce differentiation.97,99 The efficiency of cardiogenesis is generally low in this approach, but the field has applied lessons from molecular and developmental biology to derive preparations of greater cardiac purity. More than a decade ago, the Field and colleagues demonstrated the power of genetic selection to purify cardiomyocytes from pluripotent stem cells by introducing a transgene in which the cardiac specific -MHC promoter drives expression of neomyocin resistance.102 After antibiotic selection of differentiated embryoid bodies, the resultant cultures contained 99.6% MHC+ cardiomyocytes versus 0.6% in untreated cultures. Similar approaches have recently been shown to be successful with hESCs.103,104
Our group and others have used insights from developmental biology to devise protocols to more efficiently guide the differentiation of hESCs into cardiomyocytes.86,87,105 For example, we showed that the serial application of 2 TGF superfamily members, activin A and bone morphogenetic protein 4, followed by Percoll gradient purification, resulted in preparations of >80% β-MHC+ hESC-CMs.86 Following injection into recently infarcted rat hearts, these cells formed stable grafts of human myocardium. Although we do not yet know whether hESC-CMs undergo systolic activation in vivo, echocardiographic and MRI studies indicated beneficial effects on global and regional left ventricular function. Interestingly, these effects appeared to require the presence of engrafted cardiomyocytes, because they were not observed with the transplantation of noncardiac hESC derivatives. Multiple groups have now independently reported partial remuscularization and functional benefits following hESC-CM transplantation in rodent infarct models.86,88,89
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Three independent groups have reported the generation of ESC-like iPSCs by reprogramming human somatic cells with the viral delivery of 4 stem cell–associated genes.106–108 Ethical concerns are avoided because no embryos are harmed, and, in principle, the cells can be used in autologous cell therapies. There are risks associated with the integrating viruses currently used to generate iPSCs, but we anticipate that safer, nonviral approaches will be developed soon.
MacLellan and colleagues demonstrated the cardiac phenotype of murine iPSC progeny in vitro and in vivo following blastocyst injection.109 Murine iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes immunostain for sarcomeric MHC and troponin C, and they express transcripts including NKx2.5, GATA-4, MEF2c, ANP, MLC2v, and MLC2a. They exhibit calcium transients in response to field stimulation. Of note, Yamanaka and colleagues have reported that human iPSCs can be differentiated into cardiomyocytes using methods developed by our group for hESCs.106 It is too soon to know whether iPSCs will be of value in cell-based cardiac repair, but they are an attractive new candidate.
|
Conclusions |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionStem Cells and the...Evidence for Cardiomyocyte...Bone Marrow-Derived Stem CellsResident Cardiac Stem CellsStem Cells in the...Cell-Based Cardiac Repair With...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
Remuscularization of injured hearts is an ambitious goal, but recent studies indicating that adult mammalian hearts undergo limited cardiomyocyte repopulation in response to injury give some reason for hope. In this review, we have considered only 1 aspect of this challenge: the identification of potential sources of replacement cardiomyocytes. Advances in stem cell and developmental biology have resulted in the identification of numerous candidate stem cell types with putative cardiogenic potential. Nonetheless, the ideal cell type remains uncertain, despite all claims to the contrary. In our opinion, the cardiogenic potential of bone marrow–derived and circulating stem cells appears limited, but other candidates including certain resident cardiac stem cell populations and pluripotent stem cells are clearly capable of more efficient cardiogenesis. We are optimistic that research into cell-based cardiac repair will eventually yield effective myogenic therapies, but success will require rigorous attention to cardiac phenotyping, cell fate mapping, and preclinical and clinical testing.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Kip Hauch and Charles Murry for critical scientific discussions and helpful comments. We apologize to colleagues in the field whose work could not be referenced because of space limitations.
Sources of Funding
M.A.L. is supported in part by NIH grants RO1-HL064387 and K08-HL80431.
Disclosures
M.A.L. has a sponsored research agreement and is a consultant with Geron Corporation. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Original received June 2, 2008; revision received August 21, 2008; accepted September 9, 2008.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionStem Cells and the...Evidence for Cardiomyocyte...Bone Marrow-Derived Stem CellsResident Cardiac Stem CellsStem Cells in the...Cell-Based Cardiac Repair With...ConclusionsReferences |
|---|
1. Leor J, Patterson M, Quinones MJ, Kedes LH, Kloner RA. Transplantation of fetal myocardial tissue into the infarcted myocardium of rat. A potential method for repair of infarcted myocardium? Circulation. 1996; 94 (suppl II): II-332–II-336.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Li RK, Jia ZQ, Weisel RD, Mickle DA, Zhang J, Mohabeer MK, Rao V, Ivanov J. Cardiomyocyte transplantation improves heart function. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996; 62: 654–660.
3. Scorsin M, Hagege AA, Marotte F, Mirochnik N, Copin H, Barnoux M, Sabri A, Samuel JL, Rappaport L, Menasche P. Does transplantation of cardiomyocytes improve function of infarcted myocardium? Circulation. 1997; 96 (suppl II): II-188–II-193.
4. Rubart M, Pasumarthi KB, Nakajima H, Soonpaa MH, Nakajima HO, Field LJ. Physiological coupling of donor and host cardiomyocytes after cellular transplantation. Circ Res. 2003; 92: 1217–1224.
5. Zimmermann WH, Melnychenko I, Wasmeier G, Didie M, Naito H, Nixdorff U, Hess A, Budinsky L, Brune K, Michaelis B, Dhein S, Schwoerer A, Ehmke H, Eschenhagen T. Engineered heart tissue grafts improve systolic and diastolic function in infarcted rat hearts. Nat Med. 2006; 12: 452–458.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006; 126: 663–676.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Shenje LT, Field LJ, Pritchard CA, Guerin CJ, Rubart M, Soonpaa MH, Ang KL, Galinanes M. Lineage tracing of cardiac explant derived cells. PLoS ONE. 2008; 3: e1929.[CrossRef]
8. Terrovitis J, Stuber M, Youssef A, Preece S, Leppo M, Kizana E, Schar M, Gerstenblith G, Weiss RG, Marban E, Abraham MR. Magnetic resonance imaging overestimates ferumoxide-labeled stem cell survival after transplantation in the heart. Circulation. 2008; 117: 1555–1562.
9. Coyne TM, Marcus AJ, Woodbury D, Black IB. Marrow stromal cells transplanted to the adult brain are rejected by an inflammatory response and transfer donor labels to host neurons and glia. Stem Cells. 2006; 24: 2483–2492.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Burns TC, Ortiz-Gonzalez XR, Gutierrez-Perez M, Keene CD, Sharda R, Demorest ZL, Jiang Y, Nelson-Holte M, Soriano M, Nakagawa Y, Luquin MR, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Prosper F, Low WC, Verfaillie CM. Thymidine analogs are transferred from prelabeled donor to host cells in the central nervous system after transplantation: a word of caution. Stem Cells. 2006; 24: 1121–1127.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Vieyra DS, Jackson KA, Goodell MA. Plasticity and tissue regenerative potential of bone marrow-derived cells. Stem Cell Rev. 2005; 1: 65–69.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Alvarez-Dolado M, Pardal R, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Fike JR, Lee HO, Pfeffer K, Lois C, Morrison SJ, Alvarez-Buylla A. Fusion of bone-marrow-derived cells with Purkinje neurons, cardiomyocytes and hepatocytes. Nature. 2003; 425: 968–973.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Nygren JM, Jovinge S, Breitbach M, Sawen P, Roll W, Hescheler J, Taneera J, Fleischmann BK, Jacobsen SE. Bone marrow-derived hematopoietic cells generate cardiomyocytes at a low frequency through cell fusion, but not transdifferentiation. Nat Med. 2004; 10: 494–501.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Oh H, Bradfute SB, Gallardo TD, Nakamura T, Gaussin V, Mishina Y, Pocius J, Michael LH, Behringer RR, Garry DJ, Entman ML, Schneider MD. Cardiac progenitor cells from adult myocardium: homing, differentiation, and fusion after infarction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 12313–12318.
15. Reinecke H, Minami E, Poppa V, Murry CE. Evidence for fusion between cardiac and skeletal muscle cells. Circ Res. 2004; 94: e56–e60.
16. Bergsmedh A, Ehnfors J, Spetz AL, Holmgren L. A Cre-loxP based system for studying horizontal gene transfer. FEBS Lett. 2007; 581: 2943–2946.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Koyanagi M, Brandes RP, Haendeler J, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Cell-to-cell connection of endothelial progenitor cells with cardiac myocytes by nanotubes: a novel mechanism for cell fate changes? Circ Res. 2005; 96: 1039–1041.
18. Laflamme MA, Murry CE. Regenerating the heart. Nat Biotechnol. 2005; 23: 845–856.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Wang X, Willenbring H, Akkari Y, Torimaru Y, Foster M, Al-Dhalimy M, Lagasse E, Finegold M, Olson S, Grompe M. Cell fusion is the principal source of bone-marrow-derived hepatocytes. Nature. 2003; 422: 897–901.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Noiseux N, Gnecchi M, Lopez-Ilasaca M, Zhang L, Solomon SD, Deb A, Dzau VJ, Pratt RE. Mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing Akt dramatically repair infarcted myocardium and improve cardiac function despite infrequent cellular fusion or differentiation. Mol Ther. 2006; 14: 840–850.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Pfister O, Mouquet F, Jain M, Summer R, Helmes M, Fine A, Colucci WS, Liao R. CD31- but Not CD31+ cardiac side population cells exhibit functional cardiomyogenic differentiation. Circ Res. 2005; 97: 52–61.
22. Hsieh PC, Segers VF, Davis ME, MacGillivray C, Gannon J, Molkentin JD, Robbins J, Lee RT. Evidence from a genetic fate-mapping study that stem cells refresh adult mammalian cardiomyocytes after injury. Nat Med. 2007; 13: 970–974.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Beltrami AP, Barlucchi L, Torella D, Baker M, Limana F, Chimenti S, Kasahara H, Rota M, Musso E, Urbanek K, Leri A, Kajstura J, Nadal-Ginard B, Anversa P. Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell. 2003; 114: 763–776.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Bearzi C, Rota M, Hosoda T, Tillmanns J, Nascimbene A, De Angelis A, Yasuzawa-Amano S, Trofimova I, Siggins RW, Lecapitaine N, Cascapera S, Beltrami AP, D'Alessandro DA, Zias E, Quaini F, Urbanek K, Michler RE, Bolli R, Kajstura J, Leri A, Anversa P. Human cardiac stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104: 14068–14073.
25. Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, Jakoniuk I, Anderson SM, Li B, Pickel J, McKay R, Nadal-Ginard B, Bodine DM, Leri A, Anversa P. Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature. 2001; 410: 701–705.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Makino S, Fukuda K, Miyoshi S, Konishi F, Kodama H, Pan J, Sano M, Takahashi T, Hori S, Abe H, Hata J, Umezawa A, Ogawa S. Cardiomyocytes can be generated from marrow stromal cells in vitro. J Clin Invest. 1999; 103: 697–705.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Tomita S, Li RK, Weisel RD, Mickle DA, Kim EJ, Sakai T, Jia ZQ. Autologous transplantation of bone marrow cells improves damaged heart function. Circulation. 1999; 100 (suppl II): II-247–II-256.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Shim WS, Jiang S, Wong P, Tan J, Chua YL, Tan YS, Sin YK, Lim CH, Chua T, Teh M, Liu TC, Sim E. Ex vivo differentiation of human adult bone marrow stem cells into cardiomyocyte-like cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004; 324: 481–488.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Piao H, Youn TJ, Kwon JS, Kim YH, Bae JW, Bora S, Kim DW, Cho MC, Lee MM, Park YB. Effects of bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells transplantation in acutely infarcting myocardium. Eur J Heart Fail. 2005; 7: 730–738.
30. Nagaya N, Kangawa K, Itoh T, Iwase T, Murakami S, Miyahara Y, Fujii T, Uematsu M, Ohgushi H, Yamagishi M, Tokudome T, Mori H, Miyatake K, Kitamura S. Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells improves cardiac function in a rat model of dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2005; 112: 1128–1135.
31. Fazel S, Chen L, Weisel RD, Angoulvant D, Seneviratne C, Fazel A, Cheung P, Lam J, Fedak PW, Yau TM, Li RK. Cell transplantation preserves cardiac function after infarction by infarct stabilization: augmentation by stem cell factor. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005; 130: 1310.
32. Dai W, Hale SL, Martin BJ, Kuang JQ, Dow JS, Wold LE, Kloner RA. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in postinfarcted rat myocardium: short- and long-term effects. Circulation. 2005; 112: 214–223.
33. Dawn B, Tiwari S, Kucia MJ, Zuba-Surma EK, Guo Y, Sanganalmath SK, Abdel-Latif A, Hunt G, Vincent RJ, Taher H, Reed NJ, Ratajczak MZ, Bolli R. Transplantation of bone marrow-derived very small embryonic-like stem cells attenuates left ventricular dysfunction and remodeling after myocardial infarction. Stem Cells. 2008; 26: 1646–1655.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Zeng L, Hu Q, Wang X, Mansoor A, Lee J, Feygin J, Zhang G, Suntharalingam P, Boozer S, Mhashilkar A, Panetta CJ, Swingen C, Deans R, From AH, Bache RJ, Verfaillie CM, Zhang J. Bioenergetic and functional consequences of bone marrow-derived multipotent progenitor cell transplantation in hearts with postinfarction left ventricular remodeling. Circulation. 2007; 115: 1866–1875.
35. Jackson KA, Majka SM, Wang H, Pocius J, Hartley CJ, Majesky MW, Entman ML, Michael LH, Hirschi KK, Goodell MA. Regeneration of ischemic cardiac muscle and vascular endothelium by adult stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2001; 107: 1395–1402.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Murry CE, Soonpaa MH, Reinecke H, Nakajima H, Nakajima HO, Rubart M, Pasumarthi KB, Virag JI, Bartelmez SH, Poppa V, Bradford G, Dowell JD, Williams DA, Field LJ. Haematopoietic stem cells do not transdifferentiate into cardiac myocytes in myocardial infarcts. Nature. 2004; 428: 664–668.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Balsam LB, Wagers AJ, Christensen JL, Kofidis T, Weissman IL, Robbins RC. Haematopoietic stem cells adopt mature haematopoietic fates in ischaemic myocardium. Nature. 2004; 428: 668–673.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Scherschel JA, Soonpaa MH, Srour EF, Field LJ, Rubart M. Adult bone marrow-derived cells do not acquire functional attributes of cardiomyocytes when transplanted into peri-infarct myocardium. Mol Ther. 2008; 16: 1129–1137.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Laflamme MA, Myerson D, Saffitz JE, Murry CE. Evidence for cardiomyocyte repopulation by extracardiac progenitors in transplanted human hearts. Circ Res. 2002; 90: 634–640.
40. Minami E, Laflamme MA, Saffitz JE, Murry CE. Extracardiac progenitor cells repopulate most major cell types in the transplanted human heart. Circulation. 2005; 112: 2951–2958.
41. Rota M, Kajstura J, Hosoda T, Bearzi C, Vitale S, Esposito G, Iaffaldano G, Padin-Iruegas ME, Gonzalez A, Rizzi R, Small N, Muraski J, Alvarez R, Chen X, Urbanek K, Bolli R, Houser SR, Leri A, Sussman MA, Anversa P. Bone marrow cells adopt the cardiomyogenic fate in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104: 17783–17788.
42. Baddoo M, Hill K, Wilkinson R, Gaupp D, Hughes C, Kopen GC, Phinney DG. Characterization of mesenchymal stem cells isolated from murine bone marrow by negative selection. J Cell Biochem. 2003; 89: 1235–1249.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999; 284: 143–147.
44. Aggarwal S, Pittenger MF. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses. Blood. 2005; 105: 1815–1822.
45. Liu Y, Song J, Liu W, Wan Y, Chen X, Hu C. Growth and differentiation of rat bone marrow stromal cells: does 5-azacytidine trigger their cardiomyogenic differentiation? Cardiovasc Res. 2003; 58: 460–468.
46. Shiota M, Heike T, Haruyama M, Baba S, Tsuchiya A, Fujino H, Kobayashi H, Kato T, Umeda K, Yoshimoto M, Nakahata T. Isolation and characterization of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells with myogenic and neuronal properties. Exp Cell Res. 2007; 313: 1008–1023.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Silva GV, Litovsky S, Assad JA, Sousa AL, Martin BJ, Vela D, Coulter SC, Lin J, Ober J, Vaughn WK, Branco RV, Oliveira EM, He R, Geng YJ, Willerson JT, Perin EC. Mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into an endothelial phenotype, enhance vascular density, and improve heart function in a canine chronic ischemia model. Circulation. 2005; 111: 150–156.
48. Mangi AA, Noiseux N, Kong D, He H, Rezvani M, Ingwall JS, Dzau VJ. Mesenchymal stem cells modified with Akt prevent remodeling and restore performance of infarcted hearts. Nat Med. 2003; 9: 1195–1201.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Gnecchi M, He H, Liang OD, Melo LG, Morello F, Mu H, Noiseux N, Zhang L, Pratt RE, Ingwall JS, Dzau VJ. Paracrine action accounts for marked protection of ischemic heart by Akt-modified mesenchymal stem cells. Nat Med. 2005; 11: 367–368.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
50. Gnecchi M, He H, Noiseux N, Liang OD, Zhang L, Morello F, Mu H, Melo LG, Pratt RE, Ingwall JS, Dzau VJ. Evidence supporting paracrine hypothesis for Akt-modified mesenchymal stem cell-mediated cardiac protection and functional improvement. FASEB J. 2006; 20: 661–669.
51. Mirotsou M, Zhang Z, Deb A, Zhang L, Gnecchi M, Noiseux N, Mu H, Pachori A, Dzau V. Secreted frizzled related protein 2 (Sfrp2) is the key Akt-mesenchymal stem cell-released paracrine factor mediating myocardial survival and repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104: 1643–1648.
52. Hierlihy AM, Seale P, Lobe CG, Rudnicki MA, Megeney LA. The post-natal heart contains a myocardial stem cell population. FEBS Lett. 2002; 530: 239–243.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Martin CM, Meeson AP, Robertson SM, Hawke TJ, Richardson JA, Bates S, Goetsch SC, Gallardo TD, Garry DJ. Persistent expression of the ATP-binding cassette transporter, Abcg2, identifies cardiac SP cells in the developing and adult heart. Dev Biol. 2004; 265: 262–275.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Oyama T, Nagai T, Wada H, Naito AT, Matsuura K, Iwanaga K, Takahashi T, Goto M, Mikami Y, Yasuda N, Akazawa H, Uezumi A, Takeda S, Komuro I. Cardiac side population cells have a potential to migrate and differentiate into cardiomyocytes in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Biol. 2007; 176: 329–341.
55. Martin CM, Ferdous A, Gallardo T, Humphries C, Sadek H, Caprioli A, Garcia JA, Szweda LI, Garry MG, Garry DJ. Hypoxia-inducible factor-2alpha transactivates Abcg2 and promotes cytoprotection in cardiac side population cells. Circ Res. 2008; 102: 1075–1081.
56. Mouquet F, Pfister O, Jain M, Oikonomopoulos A, Ngoy S, Summer R, Fine A, Liao R. Restoration of cardiac progenitor cells after myocardial infarction by self-proliferation and selective homing of bone marrow-derived stem cells. Circ Res. 2005; 97: 1090–1092.
57. Dawn B, Stein AB, Urbanek K, Rota M, Whang B, Rastaldo R, Torella D, Tang XL, Rezazadeh A, Kajstura J, Leri A, Hunt G, Varma J, Prabhu SD, Anversa P, Bolli R. Cardiac stem cells delivered intravascularly traverse the vessel barrier, regenerate infarcted myocardium, and improve cardiac function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102: 3766–3771.
58. Pouly J, Bruneval P, Mandet C, Proksch S, Peyrard S, Amrein C, Bousseaux V, Guillemain R, Deloche A, Fabiani JN, Menasche P. Cardiac stem cells in the real world. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008; 135: 673–678.
59. Matsuura K, Wada H, Nagai T, Iijima Y, Minamino T, Sano M, Akazawa H, Molkentin JD, Kasanuki H, Komuro I. Cardiomyocytes fuse with surrounding noncardiomyocytes and reenter the cell cycle. J Cell Biol. 2004; 167: 351–363.
60. Wang X, Hu Q, Nakamura Y, Lee J, Zhang G, From AH, Zhang J. The role of the sca-1+/CD31- cardiac progenitor cell population in postinfarction left ventricular remodeling. Stem Cells. 2006; 24: 1779–1788.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
61. Holmes C, Stanford WL. Concise review: stem cell antigen-1: expression, function, and enigma. Stem Cells. 2007; 25: 1339–1347.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
62. Messina E, De Angelis L, Frati G, Morrone S, Chimenti S, Fiordaliso F, Salio M, Battaglia M, Latronico MV, Coletta M, Vivarelli E, Frati L, Cossu G, Giacomello A. Isolation and expansion of adult cardiac stem cells from human and murine heart. Circ Res. 2004; 95: 911–921.
63. Smith RR, Barile L, Cho HC, Leppo MK, Hare JM, Messina E, Giacomello A, Abraham MR, Marban E. Regenerative potential of cardiosphere-derived cells expanded from percutaneous endomyocardial biopsy specimens. Circulation. 2007; 115: 896–908.
64. Quaini F, Urbanek K, Beltrami AP, Finato N, Beltrami CA, Nadal-Ginard B, Kajstura J, Leri A, Anversa P. Chimerism of the transplanted heart. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 5–15.
65. Urbanek K, Quaini F, Tasca G, Torella D, Castaldo C, Nadal-Ginard B, Leri A, Kajstura J, Quaini E, Anversa P. Intense myocyte formation from cardiac stem cells in human cardiac hypertrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 10440–10445.
66. Laugwitz KL, Moretti A, Lam J, Gruber P, Chen Y, Woodard S, Lin LZ, Cai CL, Lu MM, Reth M, Platoshyn O, Yuan JX, Evans S, Chien KR. Postnatal isl1+ cardioblasts enter fully differentiated cardiomyocyte lineages. Nature. 2005; 433: 647–653.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
67. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, Silver M, van der Zee R, Li T, Witzenbichler B, Schatteman G, Isner JM. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997; 275: 964–967.
68. Takahashi T, Kalka C, Masuda H, Chen D, Silver M, Kearney M, Magner M, Isner JM, Asahara T. Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization. Nat Med. 1999; 5: 434–438.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
69. Shi Q, Rafii S, Wu MH, Wijelath ES, Yu C, Ishida A, Fujita Y, Kothari S, Mohle R, Sauvage LR, Moore MA, Storb RF, Hammond WP. Evidence for circulating bone marrow-derived endothelial cells. Blood. 1998; 92: 362–367.
70. Murohara T, Ikeda H, Duan J, Shintani S, Sasaki K, Eguchi H, Onitsuka I, Matsui K, Imaizumi T. Transplanted cord blood-derived endothelial precursor cells augment postnatal neovascularization. J Clin Invest. 2000; 105: 1527–1536.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
71. Rafii S. Circulating endothelial precursors: mystery, reality, and promise. J Clin Invest. 2000; 105: 17–19.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
72. Badorff C, Brandes RP, Popp R, Rupp S, Urbich C, Aicher A, Fleming I, Busse R, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Transdifferentiation of blood-derived human adult endothelial progenitor cells into functionally active cardiomyocytes. Circulation. 2003; 107: 1024–1032.
73. Koyanagi M, Urbich C, Chavakis E, Hoffmann J, Rupp S, Badorff C, Zeiher AM, Starzinski-Powitz A, Haendeler J, Dimmeler S. Differentiation of circulating endothelial progenitor cells to a cardiomyogenic phenotype depends on E-cadherin. FEBS Lett. 2005; 579: 6060–6066.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
74. Rupp S, Koyanagi M, Iwasaki M, Diehl F, Bushoven P, Schranz D, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Genetic proof-of-concept for cardiac gene expression in human circulating blood-derived progenitor cells. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51: 2289–2290.
75. Koyanagi M, Bushoven P, Iwasaki M, Urbich C, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Notch signaling contributes to the expression of cardiac markers in human circulating progenitor cells. Circ Res. 2007; 101: 1139–1145.
76. Murasawa S, Kawamoto A, Horii M, Nakamori S, Asahara T. Niche-dependent translineage commitment of endothelial progenitor cells, not cell fusion in general, into myocardial lineage cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 1388–1394.
77. Iwasaki H, Kawamoto A, Ishikawa M, Oyamada A, Nakamori S, Nishimura H, Sadamoto K, Horii M, Matsumoto T, Murasawa S, Shibata T, Suehiro S, Asahara T. Dose-dependent contribution of CD34-positive cell transplantation to concurrent vasculogenesis and cardiomyogenesis for functional regenerative recovery after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2006; 113: 1311–1325.
78. Gruh I, Beilner J, Blomer U, Schmiedl A, Schmidt-Richter I, Kruse ML, Haverich A, Martin U. No evidence of transdifferentiation of human endothelial progenitor cells into cardiomyocytes after coculture with neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Circulation. 2006; 113: 1326–1334.
79. Planat-Benard V, Menard C, Andre M, Puceat M, Perez A, Garcia-Verdugo JM, Penicaud L, Casteilla L. Spontaneous cardiomyocyte differentiation from adipose tissue stroma cells. Circ Res. 2004; 94: 223–229.
80. Yamada Y, Wang XD, Yokoyama S, Fukuda N, Takakura N. Cardiac progenitor cells in brown adipose tissue repaired damaged myocardium. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006; 342: 662–670.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
81. Kogler G, Sensken S, Airey JA, Trapp T, Muschen M, Feldhahn N, Liedtke S, Sorg RV, Fischer J, Rosenbaum C, Greschat S, Knipper A, Bender J, Degistirici O, Gao J, Caplan AI, Colletti EJ, Almeida-Porada G, Muller HW, Zanjani E, Wernet P. A new human somatic stem cell from placental cord blood with intrinsic pluripotent differentiation potential. J Exp Med. 2004; 200: 123–135.
82. Bonanno G, Mariotti A, Procoli A, Corallo M, Rutella S, Pessina G, Scambia G, Mancuso S, Pierelli L. Human cord blood CD133+ cells immunoselected by a clinical-grade apparatus differentiate in vitro into endothelial- and cardiomyocyte-like cells. Transfusion. 2007; 47: 280–289.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
83. Nishiyama N, Miyoshi S, Hida N, Uyama T, Okamoto K, Ikegami Y, Miyado K, Segawa K, Terai M, Sakamoto M, Ogawa S, Umezawa A. The significant cardiomyogenic potential of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Stem Cells. 2007; 25: 2017–2024.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
84. Ma N, Stamm C, Kaminski A, Li W, Kleine HD, Muller-Hilke B, Zhang L, Ladilov Y, Egger D, Steinhoff G. Human cord blood cells induce angiogenesis following myocardial infarction in NOD/scid-mice. Cardiovasc Res. 2005; 66: 45–54.
85. Leor J, Guetta E, Feinberg MS, Galski H, Bar I, Holbova R, Miller L, Zarin P, Castel D, Barbash IM, Nagler A. Human umbilical cord blood-derived CD133+ cells enhance function and repair of the infarcted myocardium. Stem Cells. 2006; 24: 772–780.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
86. Laflamme MA, Chen KY, Naumova AV, Muskheli V, Fugate JA, Dupras SK, Reinecke H, Xu C, Hassanipour M, Police S, O'Sullivan C, Collins L, Chen Y, Minami E, Gill EA, Ueno S, Yuan C, Gold J, Murry CE. Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts. Nat Biotechnol. 2007; 25: 1015–1024.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
87. Yang L, Soonpaa MH, Adler ED, Roepke TK, Kattman SJ, Kennedy M, Henckaerts E, Bonham K, Abbott GW, Linden RM, Field LJ, Keller GM. Human cardiovascular progenitor cells develop from a KDR(+) embryonic-stem-cell-derived population. Nature. 2008; 453: 524–528.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
88. Caspi O, Huber I, Kehat I, Habib M, Arbel G, Gepstein A, Yankelson L, Aronson D, Beyar R, Gepstein L. Transplantation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes improves myocardial performance in infarcted rat hearts. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50: 1884–1893.
89. van Laake LW, Passier R, Monshouwer-Kloots J, Verkleij AJ, Lips DJ, Freund C, den Ouden K, Ward-van Oostwaard D, Korving J, Tertoolen LG, van Echteld CJ, Doevendans PA, Mummery CL. Human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes survive and mature in the mouse heart and transiently improve function after myocardial infarction. Stem Cell Res. 2007; 1: 9–24.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
90. Leor J, Gerecht S, Cohen S, Miller L, Holbova R, Ziskind A, Shachar M, Feinberg MS, Guetta E, Itskovitz-Eldor J. Human embryonic stem cell transplantation to repair the infarcted myocardium. Heart. 2007; 93: 1278–1284.
91. Tomescot A, Leschik J, Bellamy V, Dubois G, Messas E, Bruneval P, Desnos M, Hagege AA, Amit M, Itskovitz J, Menasche P, Puceat M. Differentiation in vivo of cardiac committed human embryonic stem cells in postmyocardial infarcted rats. Stem Cells. 2007; 25: 2200–2205.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
92. Martin GR. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981; 78: 7634–7638.
93. Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature. 1981; 292: 154–156.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
94. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, Jones JM. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998; 282: 1145–1147.
95. Trounson A. The production and directed differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Endocr Rev. 2006; 27: 208–219.
96. Nussbaum J, Minami E, Laflamme MA, Virag JA, Ware CB, Masino A, Muskheli V, Pabon L, Reinecke H, Murry CE. Transplantation of undifferentiated murine embryonic stem cells in the heart: teratoma formation and immune response. Faseb J. 2007; 21: 1345–1357.
97. Kehat I, Kenyagin-Karsenti D, Snir M, Segev H, Amit M, Gepstein A, Livne E, Binah O, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Gepstein L. Human embryonic stem cells can differentiate into myocytes with structural and functional properties of cardiomyocytes. J Clin Invest. 2001; 108: 407–414.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
98. Mummery C, Ward D, van den Brink CE, Bird SD, Doevendans PA, Opthof T, Brutel de la Riviere A, Tertoolen L, van der Heyden M, Pera M. Cardiomyocyte differentiation of mouse and human embryonic stem cells. J Anat. 2002; 200: 233–242.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
99. Xu C, Police S, Rao N, Carpenter MK. Characterization and enrichment of cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells. Circ Res. 2002; 91: 501–508.
100. He JQ, Ma Y, Lee Y, Thomson JA, Kamp TJ. Human embryonic stem cells develop into multiple types of cardiac myocytes: action potential characterization. Circ Res. 2003; 93: 32–39.
101. Sartiani L, Bettiol E, Stillitano F, Mugelli A, Cerbai E, Jaconi ME. Developmental changes in cardiomyocytes differentiated from human embryonic stem cells: a molecular and electrophysiological approach. Stem Cells. 2007; 25: 1136–1144.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
102. Klug MG, Soonpaa MH, Koh GY, Field LJ. Genetically selected cardiomyocytes from differentiating embronic stem cells form stable intracardiac grafts. J Clin Invest. 1996; 98: 216–224.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
103. Anderson D, Self T, Mellor IR, Goh G, Hill SJ, Denning C. Transgenic enrichment of cardiomyocytes from human embryonic stem cells. Mol Ther. 2007; 15: 2027–2036.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
104. Huber I, Itzhaki I, Caspi O, Arbel G, Tzukerman M, Gepstein A, Habib M, Yankelson L, Kehat I, Gepstein L. Identification and selection of cardiomyocytes during human embryonic stem cell differentiation. FASEB J. 2007; 21: 2551–2563.
105. Mummery C, Ward-van Oostwaard D, Doevendans P, Spijker R, van den Brink S, Hassink R, van der Heyden M, Opthof T, Pera M, de la Riviere AB, Passier R, Tertoolen L. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to cardiomyocytes: role of coculture with visceral endoderm-like cells. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2733–2740.
106. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007; 131: 861–872.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
107. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, Nie J, Jonsdottir GA, Ruotti V, Stewart R, Slukvin II, Thomson JA. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 2007; 318: 1917–1920.
108. Park IH, Zhao R, West JA, Yabuuchi A, Huo H, Ince TA, Lerou PH, Lensch MW, Daley GQ. Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature. 2008; 451: 141–146.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
109. Schenke-Layland K, Rhodes KE, Angelis E, Butylkova Y, Heydarkhan-Hagvall S, Gekas C, Zhang R, Goldhaber JI, Mikkola HK, Plath K, Maclellan WR. Reprogrammed mouse fibroblasts differentiate into cells of the cardiovascular and hematopoietic lineages. Stem Cells. 2008; 26: 1537–1546.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
110. Lints TJ, Parsons LM, Hartley L, Lyons I, Harvey RP. Nkx-2.5: a novel murine homeobox gene expressed in early heart progenitor cells and their myogenic descendants. Development. 1993; 119: 969.
111. Kasahara H, Bartunkova S, Schinke M, Tanaka M, Izumo S. Cardiac and extracardiac expression of Csx/Nkx2.5 homeodomain protein. Circ Res. 1998; 82: 936–946.
112. Arceci RJ, King AA, Simon MC, Orkin SH, Wilson DB. Mouse GATA-4: a retinoic acid-inducible GATA-binding transcription factor expressed in endodermally derived tissues and heart. Mol Cell Biol. 1993; 13: 2235–2246.
113. Morrisey EE, Ip HS, Lu MM, Parmacek MS. GATA-6: a zinc finger transcription factor that is expressed in multiple cell lineages derived from lateral mesoderm. Dev Biol. 1996; 177: 309–322.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
114. Chapman DL, Garvey N, Hancock S, Alexiou M, Agulnik SI, Gibson-Brown JJ, Cebra-Thomas J, Bollag RJ, Silver LM, Papaioannou VE. Expression of the T-box family genes, Tbx1-Tbx5, during early mouse development. Dev Dyn. 1996; 206: 379–390.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
115. Swanson BJ, Jack HM, Lyons GE. Characterization of myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) expression in B and T cells: MEF2C is a B cell-restricted transcription factor in lymphocytes. Mol Immunol. 1998; 35: 445–458.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
116. Martin JF, Schwarz JJ, Olson EN. Myocyte enhancer factor (MEF) 2C: a tissue-restricted member of the MEF-2 family of transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993; 90: 5282–5286.
117. Edmondson DG, Lyons GE, Martin JF, Olson EN. Mef2 gene expression marks the cardiac and skeletal muscle lineages during mouse embryogenesis. Development. 1994; 120: 1251–1263.[Abstract]
118. Leifer D, Krainc D, Yu YT, McDermott J, Breitbart RE, Heng J, Neve RL, Kosofsky B, Nadal-Ginard B, Lipton SA. MEF2C, a MADS/MEF2-family transcription factor expressed in a laminar distribution in cerebral cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993; 90: 1546–1550.
119. Eugenin EA, Branes MC, Berman JW, Saez JC. TNF-alpha plus IFN-gamma induce connexin43 expression and formation of gap junctions between human monocytes/macrophages that enhance physiological responses. J Immunol. 2003; 170: 1320–1328.
120. Beyer EC, Kistler J, Paul DL, Goodenough DA. Antisera directed against connexin43 peptides react with a 43-kD protein localized to gap junctions in myocardium and other tissues. J Cell Biol. 1989; 108: 595–605.
121. Pette D, Staron RS. Myosin isoforms, muscle fiber types, and transitions. Microsc Res Tech. 2000; 50: 500–509.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
122. Boheler KR, Carrier L, de la Bastie D, Allen PD, Komajda M, Mercadier JJ, Schwartz K. Skeletal actin mRNA increases in the human heart during ontogenic development and is the major isoform of control and failing adult hearts. J Clin Invest. 1991; 88: 323–330.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
123. Fridlianskaia II, Goncharova EI, Borisov AB, Krylova TA, Pinaev GP. [Monoclonal antibodies to the muscle isoform of alpha-actinin–a marker for the study of the differentiation of skeletal and cardiac muscles]. Tsitologiia. 1989; 31: 1234–1237.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
124. Sasse S, Brand NJ, Kyprianou P, Dhoot GK, Wade R, Arai M, Periasamy M, Yacoub MH, Barton PJ. Troponin I gene expression during human cardiac development and in end-stage heart failure. Circ Res. 1993; 72: 932–938.
125. Anderson PA, Malouf NN, Oakeley AE, Pagani ED, Allen PD. Troponin T isoform expression in humans. A comparison among normal and failing adult heart, fetal heart, and adult and fetal skeletal muscle. Circ Res. 1991; 69: 1226–1233.
126. Gardner DG, Deschepper CF, Ganong WF, Hane S, Fiddes J, Baxter JD, Lewicki J. Extra-atrial expression of the gene for atrial natriuretic factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986; 83: 6697–6701.
127. Ruzicka DL, Schwartz RJ. Sequential activation of alpha-actin genes during avian cardiogenesis: vascular smooth muscle alpha-actin gene transcripts mark the onset of cardiomyocyte differentiation. J Cell Biol. 1988; 107: 2575–2586.
128. Paulin D, Li Z. Desmin: a major intermediate filament protein essential for the structural integrity and function of muscle. Exp Cell Res. 2004; 301: 1–7.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  H. C. Quevedo, K. E. Hatzistergos, B. N. Oskouei, G. S. Feigenbaum, J. E. Rodriguez, D. Valdes, P. M. Pattany, J. P. Zambrano, Q. Hu, I. McNiece, et al. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells restore cardiac function in chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy via trilineage differentiating capacity PNAS, August 18, 2009; 106(33): 14022 - 14027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. D. Boudoulas and A. K. Hatzopoulos Cardiac repair and regeneration: the Rubik's cube of cell therapy for heart disease Dis. Model. Mech., July 1, 2009; 2(7-8): 344 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Takei, H. Ichikawa, K. Johkura, A. Mogi, H. No, S. Yoshie, D. Tomotsune, and K. Sasaki Bone morphogenetic protein-4 promotes induction of cardiomyocytes from human embryonic stem cells in serum-based embryoid body development Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, June 1, 2009; 296(6): H1793 - H1803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Kaushal, C. P. Bouchard, and L. E. Wold Myocardial oxygenation is critical for improving regeneration capacity Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): H1215 - H1216. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Rochais, K. Mesbah, and R. G. Kelly Signaling Pathways Controlling Second Heart Field Development Circ. Res., April 24, 2009; 104(8): 933 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Abbate, G. G. L. Biondi-Zoccai, B. W. Van Tassell, and A. Baldi Cellular preservation therapy in acute myocardial infarction Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, March 1, 2009; 296(3): H563 - H565. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||