| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cellular Biology |
Transactivates Abcg2 and Promotes Cytoprotection in Cardiac Side Population CellsFrom the Departments of Internal Medicine (C.M.M., A.F., C.H., H.S., A.C., J.A.G., M.G.G., D.J.G.), Pathology (T.G.), and Molecular Biology (D.J.G.) and Donald W. Reynolds Clinical Cardiovascular Center (D.J.G.), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Lillehei Heart Institute (C.M.M., A.F., M.G.G., D.J.G.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; and Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation (L.I.S.), Oklahoma City.
Correspondence to Daniel J. Garry, MD, PhD, Lillehei Heart Institute, University of Minneapolis, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 508, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail garry{at}umn.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-glutathione reductase protein expression. Importantly, overexpression of Abcg2 also conferred a cell survival benefit following exposure to hydrogen peroxide. To further examine the molecular regulation of the Abcg2 gene, we demonstrated that hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-2
binds an evolutionary conserved HIF-2
response element in the murine Abcg2 promoter. Transcriptional assays reveal a dose-dependent activation of Abcg2 expression by HIF-2
. These results support the hypothesis that Abcg2 is a direct downstream target of HIF-2
which functions with other factors to initiate a cytoprotective program for this progenitor SP cell population that resides in the adult heart.
Key Words: Abcg2 cardiac SP HIF-2
oxidative stress
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Stem and progenitor cell populations, including SP cells, are exposed to environmental stress by virtue of their physical location. Although oxidative stress attributable to unchecked levels of free radical–derived reactive oxygen species (ROS) can damage DNA, proteins, and lipids,8 oxidative stress caused by modestly increased ROS can activate specific signal transduction pathways, leading to either senescence or apoptosis.9 Previous transcriptome analyses of embryonic, hematopoietic, and neural stem cells revealed a common signature of gene expression in these stem cell populations. This profile includes transcripts that function as cytoprotective factors to provide resistance against environmental stress.10–12 Recent studies that examined circulating, blood-derived endothelial progenitor cells reveal enrichment for the expression of genes encoding for antioxidative factors that reduce sensitivity toward ROS-induced cell death.13 Regulation of cytoprotective factors during injury states would be beneficial for survival and expansion of stem and progenitor cell populations.
Members of the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) family are activated by multiple environmental stimuli. HIF-1
, a master regulator for hypoxia-inducible gene expression, regulates gene expression to promote energy production as well as oxygen delivery in response to hypoxia.14–16 HIF-2
, also known as endothelial PAS domain protein 1 (EPAS1), has many similarities with HIF-1
.17–19 However, several molecular, biochemical, and physiological studies have established that HIF-1
and HIF-2
are not redundant but have distinct functional roles.17–19 HIF-2
transcriptional activity is induced in specific tissues (vascular endothelial cells, neural crest cell derivatives, cardiac myocytes, and stem cell populations)17 and is important in ROS homeostasis, apoptosis, and lung and hematopoietic development.18,19 Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that HIF-2
plays the major role in oxidative stress defense mechanisms specifically in the regulation of antioxidant enzymes. Recent studies have also demonstrated that HIF-2
and not HIF-1
is a direct upstream regulator of Oct-4, a transcription factor required for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. This latter regulatory role for HIF-2
provides a mechanism for HIF-2
–dependent regulation of stem cell function.17
In the present study, we define the response of the cardiac SP cells following injury. We undertake a transcriptome analysis to define the common transcriptional signature of the SP cell populations isolated from embryonic and adult lineages. We further define the transcriptional regulation of Abcg2 by HIF-2
. Collectively, these studies enhance our understanding of the cardiac SP cell population and provide insight regarding the functional role as well as regulation of Abcg2.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Quantitative RT-PCR Analyses
cDNA synthesis and quantitative (q)RT-PCR reactions were performed as previously described.20 All primer pairs sequences are listed in the online data supplement.
Myocardial Cryoinjury
A transmural cryoinjury was induced as described in the online data supplement. At specified days following injury, the mice were euthanized and prepared for FACS, molecular, or immunohistochemical analyses and compared with uninjured littermates. All mice were maintained in a pathogen free facility according to the animal care guidelines at the UT Southwestern Medical Center.
Immunohistochemistry
Adult hearts were fixed, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned as previously described.22 Antibodies were used as follows: polyclonal rabbit anti-ABCG2 serum (kindly provided by Susan Bates [National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Md; 1:800 dilution])7 anti–
-sarcomeric actinin serum (1:150 dilution; Sigma, St. Louis, Mo).
Cell Culture and Overexpression of Abcg2
C2C12 and mouse embryo fibroblast (MEF) cells were cultured as previously described.23 Cells were transfected with EGFP-N1 plasmid (Clontech) or the pG2-IRES-EGFP bicistronic construct. The cells were analyzed as described in the online data supplement.
Electrophoretic Mobility-Shift Assay and Chromatin Immunoprecipatation Assay
C2C12 cells were transfected with hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged HIF-2
. After 24 hours, nuclear extracts were prepared and used for electrophoretic mobility-shift assay (EMSA) as previously described.23 Chromatin immunoprecipatation assays for evaluating Abcg2 promoter binding of HIF-2
were performed as described in the online data supplement.
Reporter Gene Assays
Luciferase assays were performed as previously described.23 C2C12 myoblast cells were transfected with control (pGLT-Luc) or Abcg2-Luc constructs with or without increased amounts of HA-tagged HIF-1
or HIF-2
overexpression plasmids, as described in online data supplement.
Western Blot Analysis
Protein extracts from Abcg2-overexpressing SP cells and respective control cell populations were prepared, and Western blot analysis was preformed as previously described.24,25 Blots were probed with a polyclonal rabbit anti–glutathione reductase serum (BD PharMingen; 1:2000) and the polyclonal rabbit
-tubulin serum (Sigma-Aldrich; 1:2000 dilution).24,26
H2O2 Consumption Assays
Following the addition of 250 µmol/L H2O2 to the sample of interest, 100 µL was removed at specific time points and added to 2.0 mL of 25 mmol/L K2HPO4, 0.1%Triton X-100 (pH 7.25) with 500 µmol/L hydroxyphenyllactic acid (Sigma) and 2.0 U/mL horseradish peroxidase (added shortly before use).27
Glutathione/Oxidized Glutathione Measurements
Abcg2-overexpressing SP cells and respective control cell populations were pelleted, and glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) were extracted with 75 µL of 5% meta-phosphoric acid. Following centrifugation, GSH and GSSG present in the supernatant were resolved by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography and quantified by electrochemical detection as previously described.28
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10-fold increase in the Abcg2-positive cells at day 3 (after cryoinjury) compared with days 1 and 14 (following injury) (29.7±4.2 versus 3.2±1.5 and 2.5±1.9 respectively; n=6; * P<0.001; Figure 1D). These results support the conclusion that Abcg2-expressing cardiac SP cells increase in number following myocardial injury.
|
To define the molecular signature of the cardiac SP cells following injury, we isolated cardiac SP cells at 3 and 7 days following injury and analyzed the respective transcriptome using Affymetrix array technology. The results were then compared with cardiac SP cells harvested from the uninjured adult murine heart. The analysis of the transcriptome profiling experiments revealed a common molecular program of significantly expressed transcripts that were induced at both days 3 and 7 following myocardial injury. As shown in the Venn diagram, 333 transcripts were significantly induced in cardiac SP cells isolated on days 3 and 7 following injury (Figure IA in the online data supplement). The fold induction of representative transcripts that were commonly increased in cardiac SP cells isolated at both time periods following myocardial injury is presented in supplemental Figure IB. Interestingly, not only were there higher numbers of Abcg2-expressing SP cells, but the increased Abcg2 transcript expression was observed in individual SP cells. The transcriptome results were confirmed using qRT-PCR for several candidate genes on separately harvested samples of cardiac SP cells isolated from adult hearts 3 and 7 days following injury (supplemental Figure IC).
To define a common SP cell signature, SP cells were harvested from murine embryonic stem cells, adult mouse bone marrow, skeletal muscle, or cardiac tissue (Figure 2A through 2H), and the molecular signature was defined using Affymetrix array technology. The array data from the SP cells isolated from these lineages were compared with their respective main population (MP) and significantly upregulated transcripts are illustrated in the Venn diagrams in Figure 2I. Each SP cell population displayed a distinct pattern of transcript enrichment, although a common SP cell program was also defined. The fold changes of representative significantly enriched transcripts are shown in supplemental Figure IIA. The transcriptome results were confirmed using qRT-PCR for several candidate genes on separately harvested samples (supplemental Figure IIB). These results support the conclusion that the common SP molecular program includes cell cycle regulatory genes (ie, p21), signaling pathways (Tgfb), and cytoprotective factors (Jun, Smad7, Myc, Ndrg1, and Txnl1).
|
The transcripts that were commonly expressed in SP cell populations isolated from embryonic and adult lineages were largely associated with the cellular response to oxidative stress. Although these transcripts were commonly expressed in the SP cell populations, the transcriptome analysis could not distinguish, whether expression of these factors was a direct effect of Abcg2 itself or whether stem/progenitor cells were expressing a common program that included Abcg2 expression. To further examine whether the common transcript expression could be a direct effect of Abcg2, we overexpressed Abcg2 in C2C12 cells and isolated the Abcg2-expressing SP cells as well as MP cells (Figure 3A). Native C2C12 cells lack Abcg2 expression and therefore lack SP cells (Figure 3A). Following forced expression of Abcg2 in C2C12 myoblasts, a significant increase in the number of SP cells was observed and the ability of these cells to efflux Hoechst dye was completely blocked with fumitremorgin (FTC), a specific Abcg2 inhibitor (Figure 3A).
|
To determine whether Abcg2 expression affects the transcriptome, the molecular signature of the Abcg2-expressing C2C12 SP cells was compared with the native C2C12 MP cells. The fold changes of representative significantly enriched transcripts in the C2C12 SP cells are shown in supplemental Figure IIIA. Many of the same transcripts (that function as cytoprotective factors/pathways) that were significantly expressed in the common SP cell molecular program in ES, bone marrow, skeletal muscle, and cardiac SP cells were also enriched in the Abcg2-expressing C2C12 SP cells. Transcripts such as Atf3, Ndr1, Gsta4, and Ddit3 were significantly upregulated in the Abcg2-expressing C2C12 SP cells compared with the native C2C12 MP cells. This induction of gene expression was further confirmed using qRT-PCR analysis (supplemental Figure IIIB).
The Abcg2-expressing C2C12 SP cell transcriptome data indicate that Abcg2 expression results in the upregulation of the oxidative stress pathway. These results indicate that either Abcg2 expression was itself cytoprotective or that the expression (or overexpression) of Abcg2 results in an oxidative stress that activates oxidative stress signaling pathways. We note that no difference in cell death was observed between the experimental and control samples, indicating that Abcg2 expression does not result in unchecked oxidative stress (data not shown). Although there was not significant oxidative stress to cause cell death in the Acbg2-overexpressing cells, we hypothesized that Abcg2 was inducing a low level of oxidative stress that was "priming" or preconditioning the cells to be more resistant to oxidative stress.29,30 To examine this hypothesis, we measured the ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione (GSH/GSSG) in Abcg2-expressing C2C12 SP cells compared with C2C12 cells, which lack Abcg2. We observed that there was a lower ratio of reduced to oxidized (GSH/GSSG) glutathione in the Abcg2-expressing C2C12 cells (11.1±0.8) compared with wild-type C2C12 cells (16.4±4.7; n=6; *P<0.05; Figure 3B). To determine whether Abcg2 expression itself affects the cellular survival in other cell types, we overexpressed Abcg2 in mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells given their well-described use in oxidative stress experiments (Figure 3C).31,32 Abcg2-overexpressing MEFs and wild-type MEFs were then exposed to hydrogen peroxide. The Abcg2-overexpressing MEF SP cells displayed a survival benefit (64±4.5% cell death) compared with MEF MP cells (74±2.5% cell death n=5; *P<0.05; Figure 3D) after exposure to oxidative stress. This finding confirmed that the overexpression of Abcg2 was not generating an oxidative stress that was deleterious to the cells, but rather Abcg2 overexpression resulted in a survival benefit.
To further define the biochemical mechanism of the induction of oxidative stress genes, hydrogen peroxide consumption assays were performed in Abcg2-expressing C2C12 SP cells. We observed that the Abcg2-expressing C2C12 SP cells are able to consume hydrogen peroxide at a higher rate compared with C2C12 cells, which lack Abcg2, consistent with the notion that Abcg2 induces cytoprotective pathways (Figure 3E). Given that glutathione reductase is responsible for recycling GSSG to GSH, we hypothesized that there would be an induction of this enzyme in the Abcg2-expressing C2C12 SP cells.29 This was confirmed using Western blot analysis, which revealed higher levels of
-glutathione reductase (Gsr) expression in the Abcg2-overexpressing C2C12 SP cells compared with the C2C12 MP cells (ratio of Gsr to
-tubulin loading control, 0.547±0.1 in C2C12 MP versus 0.81±0.1 in Abcg2-overexpressing C2C12 SP cells; n=3; *P<0.05; Figure 3F and 3G). Collectively, these findings further confirmed that the upregulation of cytoprotective factors involved in the oxidative stress response is directly related to overexpression of Abcg2.
Recent studies support the notion that HIF-2
(EPAS1) may serve as a master regulator of oxidative stress response pathways.17–19 Because we have demonstrated, Abcg2 expression is associated with induction of oxidative stress pathways, we hypothesized that HIF-2
could be an upstream regulator of Abcg2. Database analysis of the 3-kb upstream fragment of the Abcg2 gene revealed the presence of an evolutionarily conserved hypoxia-response element (HRE) (Figure 4 A). The HRE was tested for its ability to interact specifically with Abcg2 in vitro using an EMSA. As outlined in Figure 4B and 4C, using the EMSA, we demonstrated that HIF-2
binds to this site (ie, HRE) because it forms a HIF-2
-DNA complex (lane 2), which is competed in the presence of excess cold competitor (lanes 3 and 4) but not the mutant (lanes 5 and 6) cold probe, and the DNA-protein complex is supershifted by anti-HA serum. As a further control, heat denaturation of the antibody before adding to the reaction fails to supershift the complex (lanes 7 and 8). Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, we confirmed that HIF-2
binds to the Abcg2 promoter in vivo. The database analysis revealed that the HRE was flanked by three HIF accessory sequences within the upstream fragment of the Abcg2 gene, as outlined in Figure 4D. Chromatin solutions, prepared from C2C12 cells transfected with either HA-tagged HIF-2
(+) or HA-tagged control (–) vector, were used to immunoprecipitate the HIF-2
–DNA complex by anti-HA serum and control IgG serum and analyzed by PCR amplification. Using primers designed to amplify the HRE, we were able to amplify product from the DNA bound to protein precipitated with the anti-HA serum only from the HIF-2
–overexpressing cells but not from control antibodies which further establishes the specificity of HIF-2
binding to the Abcg2 promoter (Figure 4D).
|
We then undertook transcriptional activation assays to confirm that the binding of HIF-2
to the Abcg2 promoter was biologically significant. Initially, we analyzed whether the Abcg2 transcript was upregulated following HIF-2
overexpression. RNA was isolated from C2C12 myoblasts transfected either with HA-tagged HIF-2
(+) or control (–) vectors and corresponding cDNA was used for qRT-PCR analysis. In response to HIF-2
overexpression, we observed a 2.7-fold induction of Abcg2 transcript (Figure 4E), whereas no significant induction was seen of Car9, a known downstream target of HIF-1
(supplemental Figure IV). This activation was further confirmed using transcriptional assays. We fused a 3-kb Abcg2 promoter fragment to the luciferase reporter. We transfected C2C12 myoblasts with the Abcg2 promoter–reporter construct and increasing HIF-2
amounts (Figure 4F). We observed a 6.1-fold increase of Abcg2 transcription in response to HIF-2
. Moreover, HIF-2
in a dose-dependent fashion transcriptionally activated the Abcg2 gene compared with the control (ie, empty vector). However, when we transfected C2C12 myoblasts with the Abcg2 promoter–reporter construct and maximum doses of HIF-1
, we observed only a 2-fold increase of Abcg2 transcription (supplemental Figure VA). These results further establish that HIF-2
binds and transactivates Abcg2 gene expression to promote cytoprotection in the cardiac SP cell population and that this response is specific for HIF-2
.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies have demonstrated that stem/progenitor cell populations have cytoprotective mechanisms that promote survival in response to stressful stimuli following a severe injury.10,11 Our second principle observation is that Abcg2 promotes a cytoprotective response in SP cell populations by inducing antioxidant stress pathways. We and others have previously demonstrated that Abcg2 functions to efflux Hoechst dye in SP cell populations, although the physiological role for this multidrug resistance protein is unclear.3,4 Using a gene disruption strategy, Abcg2-null mice are viable, and they have a relative absence of SP cells and increased toxicity with exposure to antineoplastic drugs.33 Although it is possible that other members of the ABC transporter superfamily may compensate in the absence of Abcg2, accumulating data support the notion that Abcg2 expression in stem cells may mediate the ability to respond to stressful stimuli. Recent studies have examined the global gene expression or the transcriptome of embryonic, hematopoietic, and neural stem cells and have defined a common signature of gene expression that provides resistance against environmental stress.10–12 These common programs of gene expression (including genes involved in cytoprotection) in these stem cell populations have been proposed to be a "stemness" feature, which may promote stem cell survival and regeneration of injured tissues.10–12 The transcriptome results in the present study are largely in agreement with the previous studies because they too reported an induction of stress responsive genes in SP cells (compared with MP cells). In the present study, we observed that forced expression of Abcg2 resulted in an induction of antioxidant stress pathways that resulted in increased consumption of hydrogen peroxide and increased viability. These results support the conclusion that Abcg2 expression in SP cells has a cytoprotective role and promotes cellular viability following a severe injury.
The third major finding of the present study is that HIF-2
is a potent transcriptional regulator of the Abcg2 gene. HIF-2
is a basic helix–loop–helix/PAS domain transcription factor that is similar in composition to HIF-1
but has distinct functions.19 For example, mice lacking HIF-2
have multiple organ pathologies (ie, heart, skeletal muscle, liver, etc), increased generation of reactive oxygen species, and decreased expression of antioxidant enzymes,.19 In addition, the results of transcriptional assays revealed that HIF-2
was a direct upstream regulator of antioxidant enzymes.19 Collectively, these studies support the hypothesis that HIF-2
is a primary sensor of the oxidative stress response and promotes a cytoprotective response to maintain ROS homeostasis. Importantly, these functional roles for HIF-2
were distinct from HIF-1
. Recent studies further support a specific role for HIF-2
in stem and progenitor cell populations. For example, HIF-2
is a specific upstream transcriptional activator of the pluripotency factor, Oct4 in stem cell populations.17 In the present study, we provide molecular biological and biochemical data supporting the role of HIF-2
as an upstream regulator of the Abcg2 gene. These results extend the repertoire of gene expression that is regulated by HIF-2
and provide a mechanistic insight toward the molecular response of progenitor cell populations to stressful stimuli. Moreover, these results further highlight the molecular programs characteristic of stem/progenitor cell populations that promote survival during the postinjury period, including the regulation of Abcg2 gene expression.
In conclusion, these studies demonstrate that the cardiac SP cells are resident in the adult heart and increase in number in response to injury. Furthermore, these studies also unveil a cytoprotective functional role of Abcg2 in response to oxidative stress, which are downstream of HIF-2
. These studies further enhance our understanding of the cardiac SP cell population, define a functional role of Abcg2 in the SP cell population, and decipher signal transduction pathways in which stem/progenitor cell populations are protected from oxidative stress.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
Funding was provided by GlaxoSmithKline (to C.M.M.), the American Heart Association (to D.J.G.), and the March of Dimes Associations (to D.J.G.).
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Gussoni E, Soneoka Y, Strickland CD, Buzney EA, Khan MK, Flint AF, Kunkel LM, Mulligan RC. Dystrophin expression in the mdx mouse restored by stem cell transplantation. Nature. 1999; 401: 390–394.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Martin CM, Meeson AP, Robertson SM, Hawke TJ, Richardson JA, Bates S, Goetsch SC, Gallardo TD, Garry DJ. Persistent expression of the ATP-binding cassette transporter, Abcg2, identifies cardiac SP cells in the developing and adult heart. Dev Biol. 2004; 265: 262–275.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Zhou S, Schuetz JD, Bunting KD, Colapietro AM, Sampath J, Morris JJ, Lagutina I, Grosveld GC, Osawa M, Nakauchi H, Sorrentino BP. The ABC transporter Bcrp1/ABCG2 is expressed in a wide variety of stem cells and is a molecular determinant of the side-population phenotype. Nat Med. 2001; 7: 1028–1034.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Scharenberg CW, Harkey MA, Torok-Storb B. The ABCG2 transporter is an efficient Hoechst 33342 efflux pump and is preferentially expressed by immature human hematopoietic progenitors. Blood. 2002; 99: 507–512.
6. Bunting KD. ABC transporters as phenotypic markers and functional regulators of stem cells. Stem Cells. 2002; 20: 11–20.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Litman T, Druley TE, Stein WD, Bates SE. From MDR to MXR: new understanding of multidrug resistance systems, their properties and clinical significance. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2001; 58: 931–959.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Stolzing A, Scutt A. Age-related impairment of mesenchymal progenitor cell function. Aging Cell. 2006; 5: 213–224.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Pelicci PG. Do tumor-suppressive mechanisms contribute to organism aging by inducing stem cell senescence? J Clin Invest. 2004; 113: 4–7.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Ramalho-Santos M, Yoon S, Matsuzaki Y, Mulligan RC, Melton DA. "Stemness": transcriptional profiling of embryonic and adult stem cells. Science. 2002; 298: 597–600.
11. Ivanova NB, Dimos JT, Schaniel C, Hackney JA, Moore KA, Lemischka IR. A stem cell molecular signature. Science. 2002; 298: 601–604.
12. Liadaki K, Kho AT, Sanoudou D, Schienda J, Flint A, Beggs AH, Kohane IS, Kunkel LM. Side population cells isolated from different tissues share transcriptome signatures and express tissue-specific markers. Exp Cell Res. 2005; 303: 360–374.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Dernbach E, Urbich C, Brandes RP, Hofmann WK, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Antioxidative stress-associated genes in circulating progenitor cells: evidence for enhanced resistance against oxidative stress. Blood. 2004; 104: 3591–3597.
14. Ryan HE, Lo J, Johnson RS. HIF-1 alpha is required for solid tumor formation and embryonic vascularization. EMBO J. 1998; 17: 3005–3015.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Semenza GL, Agani F, Feldser D, Iyer N, Kotch L, Laughner E, Yu A. Hypoxia, HIF-1, and the pathophysiology of common human diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2000; 475: 123–130.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Iyer NV, Kotch LE, Agani F, Leung SW, Laughner E, Wenger RH, Gassmann M, Gearhart JD, Lawler AM, Yu AY, Semenza GL. Cellular and developmental control of O2 homeostasis by hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha. Genes Dev. 1998; 12: 149–162.
17. Covello KL, Kehler J, Yu H, Gordan JD, Arsham AM, Hu CJ, Labosky PA, Simon MC, Keith B. HIF-2alpha regulates Oct-4: effects of hypoxia on stem cell function, embryonic development, and tumor growth. Genes Dev. 2006; 20: 557–570.
18. Sato M, Tanaka T, Maemura K, Uchiyama T, Sato H, Maeno T, Suga T, Iso T, Ohyama Y, Arai M, Tamura J, Sakamoto H, Nagai R, Kurabayashi M. The PAI-1 gene as a direct target of endothelial PAS domain protein-1 in adenocarcinoma A549 cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004; 31: 209–215.
19. Scortegagna M, Ding K, Oktay Y, Gaur A, Thurmond F, Yan LJ, Marck BT, Matsumoto AM, Shelton JM, Richardson JA, Bennett MJ, Garcia JA. Multiple organ pathology, metabolic abnormalities and impaired homeostasis of reactive oxygen species in Epas1-/- mice. Nat Genet. 2003; 35: 331–340.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Masino AM, Gallardo TD, Wilcox CA, Olson EN, Williams RS, Garry DJ. Transcriptional regulation of cardiac progenitor cell populations. Circ Res. 2004; 95: 389–397.
21. Gallardo TD, Hammer RE, Garry DJ. RNA amplification and transcriptional profiling for analysis of stem cell populations. Genesis. 2003; 37: 57–63.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Garry DJ, Yang Q, Bassel-Duby R, Williams RS. Persistent expression of MNF identifies myogenic stem cells in postnatal muscles. Dev Biol. 1997; 188: 280–294.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Meeson AP, Shi X, Alexander MS, Williams RS, Allen RE, Jiang N, Adham IM, Goetsch SC, Hammer RE, Garry DJ. Sox15 and Fhl3 transcriptionally coactivate Foxk1 and regulate myogenic progenitor cells. EMBO J. 2007; 26: 1902–1912.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Freitas A, Alves-Filho JC, Secco DD, Neto AF, Ferreira SH, Barja-Fidalgo C, Cunha FQ. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide-biliverdin pathway down regulates neutrophil rolling, adhesion and migration in acute inflammation. Br J Pharmacol. 2006; 149: 345–354.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Garry DJ, Ordway GA, Lorenz JN, Radford NB, Chin ER, Grange RW, Bassel-Duby R, Williams RS. Mice without myoglobin. Nature. 1998; 395: 905–908.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Yan T, Jiang X, Zhang HJ, Li S, Oberley LW. Use of commercial antibodies for detection of the primary antioxidant enzymes. Free Radic Biol Med. 1998; 25: 688–693.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Schleiss MB, Holz O, Behnke M, Richter K, Magnussen H, Jorres RA. The concentration of hydrogen peroxide in exhaled air depends on expiratory flow rate. Eur Respir J. 2000; 16: 1115–1118.[Abstract]
28. Rebrin I, Kamzalov S, Sohal RS. Effects of age and caloric restriction on glutathione redox state in mice. Free Radic Biol Med. 2003; 35: 626–635.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Dhalla NS, Elmoselhi AB, Hata T, Makino N. Status of myocardial antioxidants in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 2000; 47: 446–456.
30. Arthur PG, Lim SC, Meloni BP, Munns SE, Chan A, Knuckey NW. The protective effect of hypoxic preconditioning on cortical neuronal cultures is associated with increases in the activity of several antioxidant enzymes. Brain Res. 2004; 1017: 146–154.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Poss KD, Tonegawa S. Reduced stress defense in heme oxygenase 1-deficient cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94: 10925–10930.
32. Scorrano L, Oakes SA, Opferman JT, Cheng EH, Sorcinelli MD, Pozzan T, Korsmeyer SJ. BAX and BAK regulation of endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+: a control point for apoptosis. Science. 2003; 300: 135–139.
33. Zhou S, Zong Y, Lu T, Sorrentino BP. Hematopoietic cells from mice that are deficient in both Bcrp1/Abcg2 and Mdr1a/1b develop normally but are sensitized to mitoxantrone. Biotechniques. 2003; 35: 1248–1252.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
Related Article:
Circ. Res. 2008 102: 998-1001.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Herrmann, A. M. Abarbanell, B. R. Weil, Y. Wang, M. Wang, J. Tan, and D. R. Meldrum Cell-based therapy for ischemic heart disease: a clinical update. Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2009; 88(5): 1714 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hosoda, D. D'Amario, M. C. Cabral-Da-Silva, H. Zheng, M. E. Padin-Iruegas, B. Ogorek, J. Ferreira-Martins, S. Yasuzawa-Amano, K. Amano, N. Ide-Iwata, et al. Clonality of mouse and human cardiomyogenesis in vivo PNAS, October 6, 2009; 106(40): 17169 - 17174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pietras, L. M. Hansford, A. S. Johnsson, E. Bridges, J. Sjolund, D. Gisselsson, M. Rehn, S. Beckman, R. Noguera, S. Navarro, et al. HIF-2{alpha} maintains an undifferentiated state in neural crest-like human neuroblastoma tumor-initiating cells PNAS, September 29, 2009; 106(39): 16805 - 16810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Stamm, Y.-H. Choi, B. Nasseri, and R. Hetzer A heart full of stem cells: the spectrum of myocardial progenitor cells in the postnatal heart Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, June 1, 2009; 3(3): 215 - 229. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ferdous, A. Caprioli, M. Iacovino, C. M. Martin, J. Morris, J. A. Richardson, S. Latif, R. E. Hammer, R. P. Harvey, E. N. Olson, et al. Nkx2-5 transactivates the Ets-related protein 71 gene and specifies an endothelial/endocardial fate in the developing embryo PNAS, January 20, 2009; 106(3): 814 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Reinecke, E. Minami, W.-Z. Zhu, and M. A. Laflamme Cardiogenic Differentiation and Transdifferentiation of Progenitor Cells Circ. Res., November 7, 2008; 103(10): 1058 - 1071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Pfister, A. Oikonomopoulos, K.-I. Sereti, R. L. Sohn, D. Cullen, G. C. Fine, F. Mouquet, K. Westerman, and R. Liao Role of the ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Abcg2 in the Phenotype and Function of Cardiac Side Population Cells Circ. Res., October 10, 2008; 103(8): 825 - 835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Pfister and R. Liao Pump to Survive: Novel Cytoprotective Strategies for Cardiac Progenitor Cells Circ. Res., May 9, 2008; 102(9): 998 - 1001. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |