Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2008;102:986-993
Published online before print March 6, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.165936
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/8/986    most recent
CIRCRESAHA.107.165936v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arehart, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hwa, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arehart, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hwa, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Receptor pharmacology
(Circulation Research. 2008;102:986.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Research

Acceleration of Cardiovascular Disease by a Dysfunctional Prostacyclin Receptor Mutation

Potential Implications for Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibition

Eric Arehart*, Jeremiah Stitham*, Folkert W. Asselbergs*, Karen Douville, Todd MacKenzie, Kristina M. Fetalvero, Scott Gleim, Zsolt Kasza, Yamini Rao, Laurie Martel, Sharon Segel, John Robb, Aaron Kaplan, Michael Simons, Richard J. Powell, Jason H. Moore, Eric B. Rimm, Kathleen A. Martin, John Hwa

From the Departments of Pharmacology & Toxicology (E.A., J.S., K.D., K.M.F., S.G., Z.K., Y.R., K.A.M., J.H), General Medicine (T.M.), Cardiology (L.M., S.S., J.R., A.K., M.S., J.H.), Vascular Surgery (R.J.P.), and Genetics (J.H.M.), Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, and Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH; Department of Cardiology (F.W.A.), University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands; and Department of Epidemiology and Nutrition (F.W.A., E.B.R.), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to John Hwa, MD, PhD, Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Dartmouth Medical School, 7650 Remsen, Hanover, NH 03755. E-mail John.Hwa{at}Dartmouth.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowPatients and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Recent increased adverse cardiovascular events observed with selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition led to the withdrawal of rofecoxib (Vioxx) and valdecoxib (Bextra), but the mechanisms underlying these atherothrombotic events remain unclear. Prostacyclin is the major end product of cyclooxygenase-2 in vascular endothelium. Using a naturally occurring mutation in the prostacyclin receptor, we report for the first time that a deficiency in prostacyclin signaling through its G protein–coupled receptor contributes to atherothrombosis in human patients. We report that a prostacyclin receptor variant (R212C) is defective in adenylyl cyclase activation in both patient blood and in an in vitro COS-1 overexpression system. This promotes increased platelet aggregation, a hallmark of atherothrombosis. Our analysis of patients in 3 separate white cohorts reveals that this dysfunctional receptor is not likely an initiating factor in cardiovascular disease but that it accelerates the course of disease in those patients with the greatest risk factors. R212C was associated with cardiovascular disease only in the high cardiovascular risk cohort (n=980), with no association in the low-risk cohort (n=2293). In those at highest cardiovascular risk, both disease severity and adverse cardiovascular events were significantly increased with R212C when compared with age- and risk factor–matched normal allele patients. We conclude that for haploinsufficient mutants, such as the R212C, the enhanced atherothrombotic phenotype is likely dependent on the presence of existing atherosclerosis or injury (high risk factors), analogous to what has been observed in the cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition studies or prostacyclin receptor knockout mice studies. Combining both biochemical and clinical approaches, we conclude that diminished prostacyclin receptor signaling may contribute, in part, to the underlying adverse cardiovascular outcomes observed with cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition.


Key Words: prostacyclin • eicosanoid • cyclooxygenase-2 • G protein coupled receptor • mutation


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowPatients and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The direct cost of treating cardiovascular disease is estimated at $431.8 billion annually for the 79 400 000 individuals who have cardiovascular disease (2007 NHLBI Morbidity and Mortality Chart Book). The recent withdrawal of rofecoxib (Vioxx), following the results of the VIGOR, APPROVe, and other cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor clinical outcomes trials,1–4 and the development of cardiovascular disease in predisposed prostacyclin receptor knockout mice,5,6 underscores the necessity to better understand the effects of COX-2–derived metabolites on cardiovascular health. Endothelial prostacyclin synthesis requires the COX-2 enzyme7 and may serve a role in protection from atherothrombosis.8,9 This cardioprotective role has been supported by recent prostacyclin receptor knockout mice studies showing that the absence of the prostacyclin receptor (IP) (International Union of Pharmacology Receptor classification) leads to intimal hyperplasia, atherosclerosis, and hypercoagulability,5,6 as well as reperfusion injury,10 and premenopausal atherogenesis.11 Despite such accumulating information, controversy remains as to whether prostacyclin deficiency is the etiology of the cardiovascular events observed with COX-2 inhibition,12 particularly as no human studies have directly implicated defective prostacyclin signaling in the development of cardiovascular disease.

The human prostacyclin receptor (hIP) gene (PTGIR) spans approximately 7000 bases along chromosome 19 (locus 19q13.3) and is comprised of 3 exons separated by 2 introns, 1 intron lying upstream from the ATG start codon and the other at the end of the sixth transmembrane (TM) helix.13 It encodes a G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) composed of 386 amino acids and has a molecular mass ranging from 37 to 41 kDa, depending on different states of glycosylation.14 The hIP is most commonly associated with coupling to the G{alpha}s subunit of the heterotrimeric G protein, which on receptor activation stimulates membrane-bound adenylyl cyclase to catalyze the formation of the second messenger, cAMP.15–16 Like other prostanoid receptors, the hIP has been categorized (based on sequence homology, ligand structure, and overall receptor functionality) as a class A rhodopsin-like GPCR, and shares many structural commonalities with rhodopsin, the class A representative and "prototypical" GPCR. These common traits can be divided into 3 major receptor domains: (1) the extracellular domain, consisting of a short amino N-terminal tail and 3 extracellular loops (exoloops); (2) a TM domain, comprised of 7-TM–spanning {alpha}-helices, whose upper third {alpha}-helices contain the putative binding pocket17; and (3) the cytoplasmic or intracellular domain that is made up of 3 helix-joining intracellular loops (cytoloops), a fourth loop produced by lipid anchoring (palmitoylation) of intracellular cysteines, and a fairly lengthy carboxyl terminus (Figure 1). Genetic variants may, therefore, have differential effects on binding, expression, and activation, dependent on localization within the protein structure, analogous to the retinitis pigmentosa rhodopsin mutations.18


Figure 1
View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Detection, localization, and function of hIP receptor mutant R212C. A, Amino acid sequence of the hIP placed in a secondary structure (snake plot) format with the 7-TM helices. The N terminus is located extracellular (EC), with 2 sites of glycosylation indicated by pentagonal chains. The dual disulfide bonds are shown by the dashed line. The C terminus is intracellular (IC), with putative sites of palmitoylation–isoprenylation indicated (serrated lines). The position of the R212C is highlighted with a black arrow. B, Chromatogram from genomic DNA sequencing of cardiology patients showing the nucleotide changes at position 212 wild-type codon (CGC; I), heterozygote mutation (T/CGC; II) and homozygote mutation (TGC; III). C, Computer-derived 3D model (energy-minimized) of hIP receptor showing TM helices (red) and extracellular and intracellular loops (gray). Enlarged region highlights the third intracellular loop and location of the Arg residue at position 212, at the C-terminal end of the putative transmembrane {alpha}-helix, the position disrupted on conversion to a cysteine (R212C).

We now report that defective prostacyclin signaling appears to accelerate atherothrombosis in human subjects leading to increased cardiovascular disease and events, analogous to COX-2 inhibition. Importantly, we conclude that the association of dysfunctional prostacyclin signaling with cardiovascular disease is cardiovascular risk factor–dependent, potentially explaining the variability in association with cardiovascular disease observed with COX-2 inhibition trials.19 The mechanism arises from defective activation, inducing relative states of increased thrombosis, a hallmark of cardiovascular events.


*    Patients and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Patients and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Whole Blood Assessment
Ten milliliters of whole blood (preserved in EDTA) was collected from patients. Ligand-binding characteristics for the platelet-expressed hIP and human thromboxane receptor (hTP) were determined through saturation-binding assays, using 30 µL of human blood ({approx}1x107 platelets) and 1 of 6 different concentrations (1 to 200 nmol/L) of [3H]-iloprost (hIP agonist, specific activity 16 Ci/mmol, Amersham) or [3H]-SQ 29548, hTP antagonist, specific activity 48 Ci/mmol, PerkinElmer) to detect the hIP and hTP, respectively.20,21 Human IP receptor activation was determined through the [3H]-cAMP radio-receptor competition assay (Amersham), using 100 µL of human blood ({approx}3.3x107 platelets) at maximal doses of iloprost stimulation (10 nmol/L to 1 µmol/L). Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software Inc, San Diego, Calif). We believe that whole blood analysis is more physiological and directly pertinent to the patients. Patient variability from the use of medications and other concomitant diseases are important considerations, and thus the addition of COS-1 cell experiments (expressing the wild type or mutant receptors) were used to further support or refute our observations.

Functional assays of platelet aggregation were performed using a Chronolog aggregometer to comparing platelet-rich plasma with platelet-poor plasma (control) generated by differential centrifugation. Dose–response of prostacyclin agonists (10 pmol/L to 1 mmol/L) was determined in parallel with standard controls (eg, ADP). cAMP production was determined for each response (percentage inhibition) and correlated to the expected response for the reduced cAMP observed with R212C. Direct R212C patient blood analysis could not be performed as all patients were on multiple antiplatelet therapy including aspirin (and clopidogrel). Our aggregation analysis was, therefore, indirect, based on the observation that reduced cAMP production leads to decreased inhibition of aggregation (a relative state of hyperaggregation).

In Vitro Assessment in COS-1 Cell System
Details of the mutagenesis procedure including random mutagenesis at the 212 position can be found in the expanded Materials and Methods in the online data supplement at http://circres.ahajournals. org. Details of saturation binding, cAMP activation, and confocal microscopy can be found in our previous publication.22

Cohorts
Details about each of the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC), Nurses Health Study (NHS), and Health Professional Follow-Up Study (HPFS) cohorts studied and genomic analysis are found in the expanded Materials and Methods in the online data supplement.

Statistical Analysis
Baseline characteristics were compared between groups using Student’s t tests and {chi}2 tests as appropriate. The association of the R212C with coronary heart disease (CHD) was analyzed using the Mantel–Haenszel test and an estimate of the odds ratio, which aggregated the odds ratio from each of the 3 study cohorts. The homogeneity of the odds ratio across the three studies was tested using the Q statistic. To adjust for risk factors present in the R212C group a control group was randomly selected (n=20) from the DHMC cohort. The percentage of adverse events occurring in patients found to be positive for the R212C mutation compared with risk-matched control patients was analyzed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test for 2 independent samples. The analysis was limited to 3 years, analogous to the time periods observed in the COX-2 inhibition studies. Analysis of variance (ANOVA with post test Newman–Keuls) was used for multiple group comparisons and unpaired Student’s t tests were used to directly compare 2 sets of samples.

Analysis of the DHMC cohort was stopped at 1036 (980 used in the study) after clear statistical significance was reached. The HPFS cohort was powered greater (n=2293, double that of the DHMC cohort) to establish whether there was truly a lack of association in a low cardiovascular risk factor group.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowPatients and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
We recently screened a multiracial population to detect novel hIP genetic variants.23 An R212C was found in low frequency in both white (1/125 samples, 0.8%) and Asian (1/127 samples, 0.8%) cohorts. The R212C (rs4987262) mutation (Figure 1A and 1B), located in the critical third intracellular loop, represented a significant change in both size and charge. On analysis of our 3D homology model of the hIP (based on the 2.8-Å crystal structure of rhodopsin and site-directed mutagenesis data24), the R212C appears to be located at the end of an {alpha}-helical conformation within the critical third intracellular loop, which is known in other GPCRs to interact with G protein (Figure 1C).25,26

R212C Exhibits Defective Function in Patients Blood (Ex Vivo)
We have also detected this R212C variant in a human cardiology patient population. We were fortunate in obtaining a limited number of whole blood samples from heterozygote R212C patients (n=4, CGC/TGC) and from a single homozygote patient (n=1, TGC/TGC) (described in detail in expanded Results section in the online data supplement). No such mutant hIP structure/function analysis has ever been performed on human tissue. Our studies revealed significant defects in both agonist binding (KD) (Figure 2A and the Table) and receptor activation (cAMP production) (Figure 2B), with all mutant patient samples exhibiting clear defects. Figure 2A shows saturation binding from individual patients, and the Table summarizes the results. The hTP, also found in abundance in human blood was used as an internal control for both the assessment of binding affinities and hIP receptor expression. Binding affinities (KD) were 28.7±5.2 and 196.5±23.4 nmol/L for the wild-type hIP and R212C, respectively (P=0.0004, Student’s t test) (Table). After further detailed studies, it appears that this binding defect is, at least in part, related to age and disease severity (expanded Results section in the online data supplement). Paradoxically, hIP receptor numbers were increased in relation to hTPs (also found on platelets) in the R212C heterozygous group (P=0.007, Student’s t test) (Table). This was reflected in the reversed hIP/hTP receptor ratio (wild type=0.44±0.10; R212C=1.36±0.15; P=0.003, Student’s t test). Despite the increased receptor expression, receptor activation (cAMP production) remained severely impaired for the R212C variants (100 nmol/L iloprost wild type=1.53±0.63 pmol versus R212C=0.07±0.12 pmol cAMP; P=0.03, Student’s t test) (Figure 2B). Both heterozygote and homozygote patient blood samples exhibited defective function and increased receptor expression compared with age- and cardiovascular risk factor–matched control patients.


Figure 2
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Patient blood analysis. A, Representative saturation binding curves on patient bloods for 3 individual patients DHMC 918 (wild-type [WT]), DHMC 826 (heterozygote R212C), and DHMC 726 (homozygote R212C) to demonstrate changes in binding and expression. [3H]-Iloprost was used for detection of the hIP and [3H]-SQ 29548 for the hTP. Arrows indicate relative changes in receptor numbers comparing hIP to hTP. B, cAMP determination from the patient samples. Picomoles of cAMP were corrected for changes in receptor numbers. C, cAMP determination from COS-1 cell overexpression experiments for wild-type and R212C constructs. A dose–response for iloprost was established (1 µmol/L, 0.1 µmol/L, and 0.01 µmol/L).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Table. Summary of Saturation-Binding Results for Age- and Risk Factor–Matched Wild-Type Patients, Diseased Heterozygote Patients, and Our Single Homozygote Patient

R212C Exhibits Defective Function in COS-1 Cells (In Vitro)
Because samples from patients were limited, we sought to biochemically validate the effects of the R212C mutation in a COS-1 cell overexpression system. As with patient samples, functional assessment of the R212C variant in COS-1 revealed a consistent reduction in cAMP production compared with wild-type receptor when expressed at equivalent levels (1.0 pmol/mg membrane protein). A significant defect was observed for agonist potency (wild-type EC50=0.8±0.1 nmol/L, n=6; R212C=2.6±0.7 nmol/L, n=7; P=0.035, Student’s t test) (Figure 2C). The reason for this could be further explored with a combination of saturation binding (Bmax), Western blot analysis, and confocal microscopy. R212C showed a significant reduction in cell surface expression using saturation binding (wild type=1.05±0.06 pmol/mg membrane protein versus R212C=0.52±0.03 pmol/mg membrane protein; P=0.01, Student’s t test). Western blot analysis of cell surface membrane preparations also showed a marked reduction in protein levels for R212C (Figure 3A). Confocal analysis staining for receptor (red, anti-1D4 antibody) endoplasmic reticulum (green, anti-calnexin antibody) and nucleus (blue, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole [DAPI]) showed that there was a marked reduction in cell surface expression for R212C in comparison with wild type, as seen from the reduced red surface staining (white arrows) on the R212C versus the wild type (Figure 3B). There was significant endoplasmic reticulum retention for R212C (Figure 3B, red surrounding nucleus). Because, in overexpression systems, it is usually the endogenous signal transduction effectors that are limiting and not receptor numbers, our results suggest that the R212C that is expressed at the surface is greatly impaired given 3.25-fold reduction in potency. Thus, the in vitro results confirm the ex vivo studies showing that the R212C is functionally defective. The acute expression of R212C results in endoplasmic reticulum retention and reduced cell surface expression (reduced Bmax); however, with patient blood samples, there is an interesting paradoxical increase in receptor expression (increased Bmax), most probably secondary to a compensatory response. Although both in vitro and ex vivo analyses showed reduced function, these studies highlight the importance of using human patient tissue with the mutation of interest to observe pathophysiologically relevant results.


Figure 3
View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. R212C expression in a COS-1 system. A, Results of saturation binding and Western blot analysis performed on COS-1 membrane preparations containing R212C and wild-type constructs. B, Corresponding confocal microscopy overlay images (x63 resolution) showing predominant membrane trafficking only for wild-type protein. The hIP receptors both wild-type and mutants are labeled red (1D4 monoclonal antibody). The endoplasmic reticulum is labeled green (anti-calnexin antibody), and the overlay picture additionally has blue nuclear staining (DAPI) and a phase-contrast microscopic image of the cell to localize the cells perimeter. White arrows are used to localize areas of cell surface membrane.

R212 Stabilizes the Critical Third Intracellular Loop
We then performed random mutagenesis (expanded Materials and Methods section in the online data supplement) at the R212 position to determine the structural role played by the native Arg at this position. In addition to the 3 naturally occurring mutations at the R212 position (R212C, TGC, R212H, CAC, and R212R CGT), which we had previously identified,23 random mutagenesis led to the production of an additional 5 mutations (R212R, CGA, R212L, CTC, R212S, AGC, R212P, CCC, and R212T ACT) (Table I and Figure I in the online data supplement). All synonymous mutations (no change in amino acids) showed no difference in binding and activation in comparison with wild-type protein. In contrast, all nonsynonymous mutations exhibited an activation deficiency with evidence of normal binding. Interestingly, R212L had a significant proportion of binding-deficient receptor. These data, when combined with molecular modeling, suggested that the 212 position is critical, by virtue of both its size and charge, in stabilizing the third intracellular loop through interaction with S205 (Figure 1C). Additional mutation of S205 to alanine displayed defective activation with an EC50 of 19.1±8.1 nmol/L (wild type=0.8±0.1 nmol/L; supplemental Table I), further supporting an R212-S205 hydrogen-bonding stabilizing interaction.

R212C Defective Signaling Leads to an Increased Thrombotic State
We proceeded to address the question as to whether the defective signaling could affect platelet function, leading to a state of increased thrombosis. Because the R212C patients from whom blood samples were obtained were all receiving aspirin therapy, it was necessary to conduct these experiments on wild-type platelets from human volunteers. Dose–response experiments (agonist-induced inhibition of thrombosis) were performed on human platelet–rich plasma. A sigmoidal dose–response was achieved with the addition of increasing concentrations of iloprost (EC50=7.1±1.4 nmol/L, n=4). Corresponding cAMP production was determined and plotted against the percentage inhibition of aggregation (Figure 4). We superimposed the ranges of cAMP production previously determined in multiple samples from R212C and wild-type patients as bars along the x axis of this graph. These experiments indicate that the very low levels of hIP-stimulated cAMP generated by a defective receptor correspond to a pronounced decrease in inhibition of aggregation, which would result in a relative hyperthrombotic state (Figure 4), a critical component in the development of atherothrombosis.


Figure 4
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Platelet cAMP and inhibition of aggregation. Plot of percentage of inhibition of aggregation vs platelet cAMP production (in picomoles per liter). Reduced cAMP promotes aggregation (observed with R212C), whereas increased cAMP inhibits aggregation (observed with wild type).

R212C Is Associated With Coronary Heart Disease in a Risk Factor–Dependent Manner
We demonstrated that the R212C leads to defective hIP signaling, promoting key components in the development of atherothrombosis. To determine whether these defects are associated with clinical disease, we examined 3 separate white cohorts (total n=3970) (the R212C was found initially in only whites and Asians). The prevalence of the R212C genotype (heterozygote or homozygote) was comparable among the 3 cohorts (2.14% in DHMC, n=980; 1.72% in NHS, n=697; and 1.92% in HPFS, n=2293). Overall, the R212C was significantly associated with an increased risk for CHD (OR=1.68 [1.03 to 2.76], P=0.04) (supplemental Table II). Interestingly, analogous to the COX-2 inhibition studies, there was considerable variability in the odds ratio for individual cohorts, with only the DHMC cohort being significantly associated with CHD (OR=4.71 [1.09 to 20.36], P=0.022). An initially surprising observation was the lack of association with the HPFS, which had no association with CHD (OR, 1.15 [0.61 to 2.17], P=0.66). Of importance, however, we noted that the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors was much greater in the DHMC group in comparison with the HPFS group (Figure 5 and supplemental Table III). Furthermore, a group with intermediate risk (NHS) exhibited a trend toward CHD (OR, 2.02 [0.65 to 6.28], P=0.21). The 3 cohorts followed the same rank order: DHMC>NHS>HPFS for both R212C associations with CHD and risk factors (Figure 5 and supplemental Table III). In the high risk DHMC cohort, there are significantly more R212C in the CHD cases (19/660=2.9%) compared with the controls (2/320=0.6%). Thus, the association of R212C with coronary artery disease appears to be risk factor–dependent, suggesting that development of atherothrombosis with R212C was dependent on existing underlying disease (promoted by the large number of risk factors). This observation is strongly supported by the prostacyclin knockout mouse studies, which also demonstrated that injury or increased risk factors (concurrent LDL receptor knockout, balloon injury to artery, or precipitation of thrombosis) was required to observe a cardiovascular phenotype.5,6 Additionally, with COX-2 inhibition (leading to reduced levels of prostacyclin), cardiovascular events appeared to be most evident in those patients most predisposed to cardiovascular disease (highest cardiovascular risk factors).9 This led to our hypothesis that reduced prostacyclin signaling was accelerating existing disease, rather than causing cardiovascular disease de novo.


Figure 5
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Clinical analysis of 3 white cohorts. A graph representing the R212C frequencies in the 3 white cohorts, the DHMC, NHS, and HPFS. The white bars represent no CHD, and the shaded bars the CHD groups. The ORs are described and confidence limit observed in supplemental Table II.

R212C Increases CHD Severity, Disease Burden, and Cardiovascular Events
To address the hypothesis (existing underlying disease was accelerated by R212C), it was mandatory to compare age- and risk factor–matched controls with and without R212C in the DHMC cardiology population for which we had coronary angiographic results. We assessed both disease severity (number of major vessels score of 1 to 3 with significant obstructions) and clinical cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary angioplasty, stroke, documented peripheral vascular disease, unstable angina, and cardiac bypass surgery). For the DHMC cohort, there was a mean±SE of 1.5±0.04 vessels occluded per patient, in comparison with 2.1±0.2 vessels occluded per patient in the R212C cases (P=0.019, Student’s t test) (Figure 6A). The R212C cohort had a lower incidence of patients with no disease and a higher incidence of triple-vessel disease (Figure 6B). The number of adverse events was significantly higher for the R212C group (4.6±0.7 events) versus control (2.7±0.4 events) (P=0.026, Student’s t test; Figure 6C), despite the use of aspirin in all patients except 1 (allergic to aspirin, on clopidogrel). To determine whether the R212C variant predisposed patients to a higher frequency of adverse events, we used a Wilcoxon rank-sum test, in which we limited the assessment of events to the number of follow-up years available for all patients (first 3 years from the initial event, 60 patient years in total for both groups). We found a significant difference between the R212C and risk factor–matched control cohort with regard to adverse event frequency (P=0.016, Wilcoxon rank-sum test) (Figure 6D). Again, these results are supported by the knockout mice studies in which the exaggerated atherothrombotic response in these knockout mice studies required vascular injury initiation (eg, concurrent LDL receptor knockout11 or balloon injury5). Similarly, the hazards associated with COX-2 inhibition are most apparent in patients with the greatest cardiovascular risk factors (ie, predisposition to atherothrombosis).9 The most dramatic example of coronary artery disease acceleration could be observed in our single homozygote patient (expanded Results and Figure II in the online data supplement).


Figure 6
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. R212C association with accelerated disease. A, Comparison of disease severity (vessels with significant obstruction, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary artery) in the cardiology cohort vs the R212C (both heterozygote and homozygote) patients. B, An analysis of disease severity in the cardiology control cohort vs the R212C cohort focusing on percentage of cohort with the number of vessels obstructed. C, Total cardiovascular adverse events recorded in the risk-matched cardiology control patients (n=20) and the R212C patients (n=20). D, Number of cardiovascular events recorded for patients from either the risk-matched control patients or the R212C patients. Events were recorded for 3 years from the initial hospital visit/admission for a cardiovascular event.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowPatients and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Only recently have IP polymorphisms been reported and characterized.20,23,27 All characterizations, however, have been in in vitro COS-1 overexpression systems. Our present studies in human patient tissues highlight the importance of such analysis, because we are able to detect functional defects, in addition to potential compensatory mechanisms for the defects (increase in hIP receptors on platelets). Furthermore, the mechanism that leads to clinical association can be deciphered, and the reason for lack of association in other populations may be determined. There has already been some evidence in the literature from COX -2 inhibition trials that the reduction in prostacyclin may be associated with systemic hypertension in human subjects28; however, no study has directly linked such prostacyclin signaling deficiencies with human cardiovascular disease. Consistent with these early observations, 80% of the R212C patients in the DHMC population were hypertensive in comparison with the DHMC cardiology population overall, which had a 67% incidence of hypertension. Our goals herein were to assess whether defective prostacyclin signaling is associated with cardiovascular disease in human subjects, as was suggested from both the selective COX-2 inhibitor trials1–3 and genetic knockout mice.5,6,10

Underlying Disease or Injury Is Required for the R212C Phenotype
We are rapidly becoming aware that genetic variants may remain silent under normal physiological conditions, or throughout childhood and early adulthood, with the underlying functional abnormalities becoming apparent only in the diseased state or under times of pathophysiological insult.29–31 For the prostacyclin signaling pathway, this was demonstrated most dramatically with the IP knockout mice, in which underlying stress or injury was required to reveal that the lack of this receptor promotes increased thrombosis or intimal hyperplasia.5,6,10 We now demonstrate in patients that cardiovascular risk factors likely provide the analogous underlying injury. In this context, the R212C accelerates cardiovascular disease. In the absence of significant risk factors, there appears to be no significant R212C phenotype. This is in parallel to COX-2 inhibition, where reduction in prostacyclin production appears to increase cardiovascular events in high cardiovascular risk patients but shows a lack of association in other study populations. This important principle may explain why many high-profile articles reporting polymorphism–disease associations are not uniformly confirmed by parallel studies. For such association studies, separate populations with differential risk factor profiles may now be necessary.

Mechanism for R212C Modulation of CHD
The mechanism for the accelerated atherothrombosis appears to be, at least in part, attributable to a combination of reduced ability to inhibit thrombosis from reduced cAMP signaling in platelets and an inability to reduce human coronary vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) proliferation and dedifferentiation,32 also from reduced cAMP production in VSMCs. For the R212C variant, this appears to arise from the disruption of a critical interaction between R212 and S205, required for stabilizing conformation in the critical G protein–interacting third intracellular loop. A decrease in the effective dose of prostacyclin, attributable either to receptor signaling defects or to inhibition of prostacyclin production (COX-2 inhibition), would also promote thrombosis and promote dedifferentiation and proliferation in human coronary VSMCs. These critical components of atherothrombosis were most clearly defective in our homozygote patient, who had significant disease acceleration at the age of 70 years, on a background of only statin controlled hyperlipidemia. Aspirin (predominant COX-1 inhibitor) itself appears insufficient to oppose the atherothrombotic state in our CHD R212C patients, because all the CHD R212C patients (except 1) were receiving low-dose aspirin therapy.

Conclusion
Our combination of in vitro tissue culture analysis, patient blood analysis (defective R212C activation), and the case–control study of R212C patients (showing increased disease and cardiovascular events), together with the published observations from COX-2 inhibition trials (increased cardiovascular events) and IP knockout mice studies (increased cardiovascular disease), all support the conclusion that defective prostacyclin signaling promotes cardiovascular disease in human subjects. Analogous to the knockout mice, we have now shown for the first time that prostacyclin signaling appears to contribute to cardiovascular phenotype in humans in a risk factor–dependent manner. Although the R212C hIP polymorphism is observed at low frequency (2% in our 3 cohorts), with more than 60 million cardiovascular patients in the United States, 2% represents more than 1 million patients. In addition to mandatory control of risk factors, the therapy of choice for R212C may ultimately be potent, stable prostacyclin analogs.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank members of the DHMC Cardiology Department for assistance in patient recruitment. We are indebted to Dorothy Belloni, BS, and Maureen Shyu, BS, for technical assistance.

Sources of Funding

This study was supported by NIH National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grants HL077612 (to R.P.) and HL074190 (to J.H.) and the American Heart Association (K.A.M.). J.H. is an Established Investigator of the American Heart Association. The NHS and HPFS have been funded by NIH grants HL35464, CA55075, and HL34594. F.W.A. is a Research Fellow of the Netherlands Heart Foundation and the Dutch Inter University Cardiology Institute, The Netherlands.

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
*These authors contributed equally to this work. Back

Original received October 11, 2007; revision received February 12, 2008; accepted February 21, 2008.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowPatients and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Nussmeier NA, Whelton AA, Brown MT, Langford RM, Hoeft A, Parlow JL, Boyce SW, Verburg KM. Complications of the COX-2 inhibitors parecoxib and valdecoxib after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1081–1091.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Solomon SD, McMurray JJ, Pfeffer MA, Wittes J, Fowler R, Finn P, Anderson WF, Zauber A, Hawk E, Bertagnolli M. Cardiovascular risk associated with celecoxib in a clinical trial for colorectal adenoma prevention. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1071–1080.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Bresalier RS, Sandler RS, Quan H, Bolognese JA, Oxenius B, Horgan K, Lines C, Riddell R, Morton D, Lanas A, Konstam MA, Baron JA. Cardiovascular events associated with rofecoxib in a colorectal adenoma chemoprevention trial. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1092–1102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Drazen JM. COX-2 inhibitors–a lesson in unexpected problems. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1131–1132.[Free Full Text]

5. Cheng Y, Austin SC, Rocca B, Koller BH, Coffman TM, Grosser T, Lawson JA, FitzGerald GA. Role of prostacyclin in the cardiovascular response to thromboxane A2. Science. 2002; 296: 539–541.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Murata T, Ushikubi F, Matsuoka T, Hirata M, Yamasaki A, Sugimoto Y, Ichikawa A, Aze Y, Tanaka T, Yoshida N, Ueno A, Oh-ishi S, Narumiya S. Altered pain perception and inflammatory response in mice lacking prostacyclin receptor. Nature. 1997; 388: 678–682.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. McAdam BF, Catella-Lawson F, Mardini IA, Kapoor S, Lawson JA, FitzGerald GA. Systemic biosynthesis of prostacyclin by cyclooxygenase (COX)-2: the human pharmacology of a selective inhibitor of COX-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999; 96: 272–277.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Fitzgerald GA. Coxibs and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 1709–1711.[Free Full Text]

9. Grosser T, Fries S, Fitzgerald GA. Biological basis for the cardiovascular consequences of COX-2 inhibition: therapeutic challenges and opportunities. J Clin Invest. 2006; 116: 4–15.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Xiao CY, Hara A, Yuhki Ki K, Fujino T, Ma H, Okada Y, Takahata O, Yamada T, Murata T, Narumiya S, Ushikubi F. Roles of prostaglandin i(2) and thromboxane a(2) in cardiac ischemia- reperfusion injury: a study using mice lacking their respective receptors. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2210–2215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Egan KM, Lawson JA, Fries S, Koller B, Rader DJ, Smyth EM, Fitzgerald GA. COX-2-derived prostacyclin confers atheroprotection on female mice. Science. 2004; 306: 1954–1957.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Flavahan NA. Balancing prostanoid activity in the human vascular system. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2007; 28: 106–110.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Ogawa Y, Tanaka I, Inoue M, Yoshitake Y, Isse N, Nakagawa O, Usui T, Itoh H, Yoshimasa T, Narumiya S, Nakao K. Structural organization and chromosomal assignment of the human prostacyclin receptor gene. Genomics. 1995; 27: 142–148.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Boie Y, Rushmore TH, Darmon-Goodwin A, Grygorczyk R, Slipetz DM, Metters KM, Abramovitz M. Cloning and expression of a cDNA for the human prostanoid IP receptor. J Biol Chem. 1994; 269: 12173–12178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Narumiya S, Sugimoto Y, and Ushikubi F. Prostanoid Receptors: Structures, Properties, and Functions. Physiol Rev. 1999; 79: 1193–1226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Wise H, Jones RL. Focus on prostacyclin and its novel mimetics. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1996; 17: 17–21.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Stitham J, Stojanovic A, Merenick BL, O’Hara KA, Hwa J. The unique ligand-binding pocket for the human prostacyclin receptor. Site–directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 4250–4257.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Hwa J, Garriga P, Liu X, Khorana HG. Structure and function in rhodopsin: packing of the helices in the transmembrane domain and folding to a tertiary structure in the intradiscal domain are coupled. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94: 10571–10576.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. McGettigan P, Henry D. Cardiovascular risk and inhibition of cyclooxygenase: a systematic review of the observational studies of selective and nonselective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase 2. JAMA. 2006; 296: 1633–1644.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Stitham J, Stojanovic A, Hwa J. Impaired receptor binding and activation associated with a human prostacyclin receptor polymorphism. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 15439–15444.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Stitham J, Martin KA, Hwa J. The critical role of transmembrane prolines in human prostacyclin receptor activation. Mol Pharmacol. 2002; 61: 1202–1210.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Stitham J, Gleim SR, Douville K, Arehart E, Hwa J. Versatility and differential roles of cysteine residues in human prostacyclin receptor structure and function. J Biol Chem. 2006; 281: 37227–37236.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Stitham J, Arehart EJ, Gleim S, Douville K, MacKenzie T, Hwa J. Arginine (CGC) codon targeting in the human prostacyclin receptor gene (PTGIR) and G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR). Gene. 2007; 396: 180–187.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Stitham J, Arehart EJ, Gleim SR, Douville KL, Hwa J. Human prostacyclin receptor structure and function from naturally-occurring and synthetic mutations. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2007; 82: 95–108.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

25. Farrens DL, Altenbach C, Yang K, Hubbell WL, Khorana HG. Requirement of rigid-body motion of transmembrane helices for light activation of rhodopsin. Science. 1996; 274: 768–770.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Palczewski K, Kumasaka T, Hori T, Behnke CA, Motoshima H, Fox BA, Le Trong I, Teller DC, Okada T, Stenkamp RE, Yamamoto M, Miyano M. Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a G protein-coupled receptor. Science. 2000; 289: 739–745.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Stitham J, Arehart E, Gleim SR, Li N, Douville K, Hwa J. New insights into human prosatcyclin receptor structure and function through natural and synthetic mutations of transmembrane charged residues. Br J Pharmacol. 2007; 152: 513–522.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

28. FitzGerald GA. COX-2 and beyond: approaches to prostaglandin inhibition in human disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003; 2: 879–890.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Liggett SB, Mialet-Perez J, Thaneemit-Chen S, Weber SA, Greene SM, Hodne D, Nelson B, Morrison J, Domanski MJ, Wagoner LE, Abraham WT, Anderson JL, Carlquist JF, Krause-Steinrauf HJ, Lazzeroni LC, Port JD, Lavori PW, Bristow MR. A polymorphism within a conserved beta(1)-adrenergic receptor motif alters cardiac function and beta-blocker response in human heart failure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103: 11288–11293.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Liggett SB, Wagoner LE, Craft LL, Hornung RW, Hoit BD, McIntosh TC, Walsh RA. The Ile164 beta2-adrenergic receptor polymorphism adversely affects the outcome of congestive heart failure. J Clin Invest. 1998; 102: 1534–1539.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Taylor DR, Drazen JM, Herbison GP, Yandava CN, Hancox RJ, Town GI. Asthma exacerbations during long term beta agonist use: influence of beta(2) adrenoceptor polymorphism. Thorax. 2000; 55: 762–767.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Fetalvero KM, Shyu M, Nomikos AP, Chiu YF, Wagner RJ, Powell RJ, Hwa J, Martin KA. The prostacyclin receptor induces human vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation via the protein kinase A pathway. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006; 290: H1337–H1346.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. Strassheim, S. R. Riddle, D. L. Burke, M. W. Geraci, and K. R. Stenmark
Prostacyclin Inhibits IFN-{gamma}-Stimulated Cytokine Expression by Reduced Recruitment of CBP/p300 to STAT1 in a SOCS-1-Independent Manner
J. Immunol., December 1, 2009; 183(11): 6981 - 6988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
E. M. Smyth, T. Grosser, M. Wang, Y. Yu, and G. A. FitzGerald
Prostanoids in health and disease
J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2009; 50(Supplement): S423 - S428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. A. Garcia Rodriguez, S. Tacconelli, and P. Patrignani
Role of Dose Potency in the Prediction of Risk of Myocardial Infarction Associated With Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in the General Population
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 11, 2008; 52(20): 1628 - 1636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Minuz
Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Cardiovascular Risk: Is Prostacyclin Inhibition the Key Event?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 11, 2008; 52(20): 1637 - 1639.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
E. Gomez, C. Schwendemann, S. Roger, S. Simonet, J. Paysant, C. Courchay, T. J. Verbeuren, and M. Feletou
Aging and prostacyclin responses in aorta and platelets from WKY and SHR rats
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2008; 295(5): H2198 - H2211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Prevention ResearchHome page
R. Nemenoff, A. M. Meyer, T. M. Hudish, A. B. Mozer, A. Snee, S. Narumiya, R. S. Stearman, R. A. Winn, M. Weiser-Evans, M. W. Geraci, et al.
Prostacyclin Prevents Murine Lung Cancer Independent of the Membrane Receptor by Activation of Peroxisomal Proliferator-Activated Receptor {gamma}
Cancer Prevention Research, October 1, 2008; 1(5): 349 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
F. Biscetti and R. Pola
Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Angiogenesis Join the PPARty
Circ. Res., July 3, 2008; 103(1): 7 - 9.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/8/986    most recent
CIRCRESAHA.107.165936v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arehart, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hwa, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arehart, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hwa, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*HomoloGene*UniGene
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow Receptor pharmacology