Editorials |
From the Department of Medicine and Research Center, Montreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Correspondence to Stanley Nattel, 5000 Belanger St E, Montreal H1T 1C8, Quebec, Canada. E-mail stanley.nattel{at}icm-mhi.org
See related article, pages 1406–1415
Key Words: arrhythmia mechanisms transcription genome arrhythmias
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A variety of cardiac disease processes, including myocardial infarction, valvular heart disease, various cardiomyopathies, arrhythmias, and hypertensive heart disease, can cause ion channel remodeling.2,3 Many of these cause cardiac hypertrophy, defined as an increase in myocardial cell mass. Because cardiomyocyte number is relatively fixed in adult life, hypertrophy is typified by an increase in cardiomyocyte size, allowing for increased heart mass with the same number of cells. Cell dimension measurements are the most direct means to characterize cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.
In electrophysiological studies, cellular hypertrophy is often assessed by determining cell capacitance. The lipid bilayer (electrically resistive) cell membrane acts as a capacitor separating the electrically conducting intracellular solution from the conductive extracellular solution. Electric current passes across cardiac cell membranes to charge their capacitance, even when no current traverses ion channels. Capacitance is a function of intrinsic capacitive properties (indicated by the "dielectric constant"), the capacitive (in this case, cell membrane) surface area, and the thickness of the capacitor. The thickness and intrinsic capacitive properties of cell membranes are fairly constant, so the dominant factor determining cell capacitance is the total membrane surface area. Cell size increases with cardiac hypertrophy. Augmented cell size is accompanied by increased cell surface area, therefore inevitably increasing cell capacitance.
| Ion Channel Remodeling and Corrections for Hypertrophy-Related "Artifacts" |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Gene Expression Changes and Internal Standards |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| The Complexity of Ionic Current Remodeling |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| New Insights Into the Complex Molecular Basis of K+ Current Remodeling in Cardiac Hypertrophy |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The authors suggest that 2 distinct processes are involved in ion current changes: cellular (cardiomyocyte enlargement) and molecular (alterations in ion channel subunit quantity). The Figure is a schematic intended to clarify this notion. Cardiomyocytes are depicted with gray fill and ion channels by small cylinders in the cell membrane. Nonhypertrophied conditions are shown in the top left area of the figure; hypertrophied conditions are depicted in the lower right stippled area. Total current amplitude is determined by the total number of membrane ion channels per cell, whereas current density is determined by the number of channels per unit of membrane (roughly indicated in the Figure by the length of membrane between channels). A normal cardiomyocyte is depicted in the Figure (A). Ion channel downregulation can occur in the absence of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy,6,11 decreasing both current amplitude and density (Figure, B). A cardiomyocyte that is hypertrophied, but has no change in ion channel expression per se, is shown in the Figure (C). The total number of channels is not altered; therefore, current amplitude is unchanged. However, because of increased membrane surface area, channels are more widely separated in the membrane and current density decreases. D in the Figure shows a cell with both hypertrophy and decreased ion channel expression, causing both decreased current amplitude and greatly decreased current density.
|
| Which Reflects "Reality": Changes in Ion Current Density or Changes in Ion Current Amplitude? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ion current density reflects the amount of current that passes across a given area of membrane, ie, the rate of ion flow acting on local transmembrane potentials, and is therefore the most relevant index to understanding changes in cellular electrophysiology. This concept is nicely reflected by the results of the Marionneau et al10 study: current amplitude increased for 1 current (Iss), decreased for another (IK,slow), and remained unchanged for 2 others (Ito,f and IK1), suggesting little net K+ current amplitude change. However, current density was reduced for all 4 K+ currents studied, and repolarization indices (both QT interval and action potential duration) were significantly prolonged by
40%.
On the other hand, consideration of current amplitude is important for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying disease-induced alterations in ionic current function. As illustrated in the Figure and pointed out by Marionneau et al,10 decreased ion current density does not necessarily reflect an absolute reduction in the number of ion channel subunits produced by the cell and trafficked to the membrane. Decreased current density may result even when ion channel subunit production and trafficking are unaffected by hypertrophy, because the presence of a normal number of channels in a hypertrophied cell leads to decreased numbers of channels per unit of membrane area (Figure, C).
| Important Conceptual Consequences of the Findings by Marionneau et al |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
Funded by an operating grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP 68929) and by the European-North American Atrial Fibrillation Research Alliance (ENAFRA) network award from Fondation Leducq.
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Nattel S, Maguy A, Le Bouter S, Yeh YH. Arrhythmogenic ion-channel remodeling in the heart: heart failure, myocardial infarction, and atrial fibrillation. Physiol Rev. 2007; 87: 425–456.
3. Tomaselli GF, Marbán E. Electrophysiological remodeling in hypertrophy and heart failure. Cardiovasc Res. 1999; 42: 270–283.
4. Kleiman RB, Houser SR. Calcium currents in normal and hypertrophied isolated feline ventricular myocytes. Am J Physiol. 1988; 255: H1434–H1442.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Cardin S, Libby E, Pelletier P, Le Bouter S, Shiroshita-Takeshita A, Le Meur N, Léger J, Demolombe S, Ponton A, Glass L, Nattel S. Contrasting gene expression profiles in two canine models of atrial fibrillation. Circ Res. 2007; 100: 425–433.
6. Yue L, Feng J, Gaspo R, Li GR, Wang Z, Nattel S. Ionic remodeling underlying action potential changes in a canine model of atrial fibrillation. Circ Res. 1997; 81: 512–525.
7. Tsuji Y, Zicha S, Qi XY, Kodama I, Nattel S. Potassium channel subunit remodeling in rabbits exposed to long-term bradycardia or tachycardia: discrete arrhythmogenic consequences related to differential delayed-rectifier changes. Circulation. 2006; 113: 345–355.
8. Nuss HB, Houser SR. T-type Ca2+ current is expressed in hypertrophied adult feline left ventricular myocytes. Circ Res. 1993; 73: 777–782.
9. Dobrev D, Graf E, Wettwer E, Himmel HM, Hála O, Doerfel C, Christ T, Schüler S, Ravens U. Molecular basis of downregulation of G-protein-coupled inward rectifying K(+) current (I(K,ACh) in chronic human atrial fibrillation: decrease in GIRK4 mRNA correlates with reduced I(K,ACh) and muscarinic receptor-mediated shortening of action potentials. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2551–2557.
10. Marionneau C, Brunet S, Flagg TP, Pilgram TK, Demolombe S, Nerbonne JM. Distinct cellular and molecular mechanisms underlie functional remodeling of repolarizing K+ currents with left ventricular hypertrophy. Circ Res. 2008; 102: 1406–1415.
11. Yue L, Melnyk P, Gaspo R, Wang Z, Nattel S. Molecular mechanisms underlying ionic remodeling in a dog model of atrial fibrillation. Circ Res. 1999; 84: 776–784.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |