Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2008;102:121-130
Published online before print October 25, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.162982
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/121    most recent
CIRCRESAHA.107.162982v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bostick, B.
Right arrow Articles by Duan, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bostick, B.
Right arrow Articles by Duan, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other myocardial biology
Right arrow Other heart failure
Right arrow Gene therapy
Right arrow Genetics of cardiovascular disease
Right arrow Other Treatment
(Circulation Research. 2008;102:121.)
© 2008 American Heart Association, Inc.


Integrative Physiology

Prevention of Dystrophin-Deficient Cardiomyopathy in Twenty-One-Month-Old Carrier Mice by Mosaic Dystrophin Expression or Complementary Dystrophin/Utrophin Expression

Brian Bostick*, Yongping Yue*, Chun Long, Dongsheng Duan

From the Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Missouri, Columbia.

Correspondence to Dongsheng Duan, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Missouri, School of Medicine, One Hospital Dr, M610G, MSB, Columbia, MO 65212. E-mail duand{at}missouri.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
A cure for dystrophin-deficient muscular dystrophy requires treating both skeletal muscle and the heart. Whereas mosaic dystrophin expression has been shown to protect skeletal muscle, controversy exists over whether mosaic expression is protective in the heart. We have shown recently that mosaic dystrophin expression prevents stress-induced heart damage in young carrier mice. Although an interesting finding, the clinical relevance remains to be established because young dystrophin-null mdx mice do not have heart disease. On the other hand, heart failure has been reported in human carriers. To resolve this mouse/human discrepancy, we evaluated the cardiac phenotype in 21-month-old mdx, carrier, and normal mice. We found dilated cardiomyopathy in old mdx mice but not in age-matched carrier mice. All anatomical parameters and physiological assay results (ECG and closed-chest Millar catheter) were within the normal range in old carrier mice. Focal myocardial inflammation was found in a small fraction of old carrier mice, but it had no major impact on heart function. Dobutamine stress revealed a near normal hemodynamic profile except for a marginal reduction in systolic pressure in old carrier mice. Immunostaining and Western blot showed dystrophin expression in 50% cardiomyocytes in old carrier mice. Interestingly, utrophin was upregulated in dystrophin-negative heart cells in carrier mice. In summary, we have provided the first clear-cut evidence that dilated cardiomyopathy in old mdx mice was prevented by mosaic dystrophin expression or complementary dystrophin/utrophin expression. Our results raise the hope for ameliorating dystrophic cardiomyopathy through partial gene and/or cell therapy.


Key Words: cardiomyopathy • gene therapy • myocardium • genetics • heart disease


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Heart disease profoundly affects the life quality of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) patients.1,2 DMD and BMD are caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene. Dystrophin is a long rod-shaped cytoskeletal protein located at the cytosolic surface of the sarcolemma. It glues the cytoskeleton, sarcolemma, and extracellular matrix together to prevent cell membrane damage during muscle contraction. Absence of dystrophin or abnormal dystrophin expression weakens the physical link between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. As a consequence, the affected muscle cells undergo degeneration and necrosis. Eventually, muscle tissue is replaced by fibrous, bony and/or fatty tissue and loses function.

Pathology in the heart and the diaphragm determines the life span in DMD/BMD patients. Until recently, approximately 80% to 90% of DMD patients died from respiratory failure because of a weak diaphragm. With improved respiratory care, heart-related death has become more frequent, even approaching 40% in some studies.3 Currently, symptomatic management is the only treatment option. The advent of gene and cell therapies brings the hope of a cure for DMD/BMD.2 In gene therapy, the mutated gene is replaced and/or repaired.4 In cell therapy, a population of functional stem cells is introduced to regenerate muscle.5 The fundamental idea behind these novel therapies is to produce enough dystrophin-expressing muscle cells to halt or reverse the dystrophic process.

To completely transduce and/or regenerate every single muscle cell may not be realistic. It is thus critical to determine whether mosaic dystrophin expression in a subpopulation of cells can fulfill the physiologic need. Fifty-percent mosaic expression has been shown to ameliorate severe skeletal muscle disease in human patients.6,7 We recently observed similar findings in mice with adenoassociated virus–mediated expression of a highly abbreviated microdystrophin gene.8 Despite the importance and need for treating dystrophic cardiomyopathy, very few studies have been performed to determine whether mosaic dystrophin expression benefits the heart.

To address this issue, we previously examined heart function in 3-month-old mdx mice and carrier mice. mdx mice are naturally occurring dystrophin-null mice found in the C57Bl/10 (BL10) background but they do not display classic dystrophic cardiomyopathy such as prominent fibrosis at young age. However under positive inotropic stress, the young mdx hearts show obvious sarcolemma damage as well as reduced hemodynamic performance.9 Carrier mice express dystrophin in only half of the heart cells. Surprisingly, stress-induced heart damage was completely normalized in young carrier mice.9 Although this is an informative result, it may not be applicable to patients who, unlike young mdx mice, do experience dilated cardiomyopathy. Whether mosaic expression can indeed prevent cardiomyopathy remains an unanswered question.

Partial/mosaic correction is the most likely outcome of gene and/or cell therapy for DMD/BMD heart disease. It is therefore important to determine whether an incomplete therapy can lead to clinically meaningful improvement in the heart. To answer this question, we first established a phenotypic cardiomyopathy model in 21-month-old mdx mice. We then evaluated heart structure and function in age-matched carrier mice. Mosaic dystrophin expression in half cardiomyocytes prevented the development of cardiomyopathy in old carrier mice. Additional studies showed utrophin upregulation in dystrophin-negative cardiomyocytes. Taken together, we have demonstrated, for the first time, that mosaic dystrophin expression was sufficient to maintain healthy hearts in a phenotypic model. Our data strongly support further pursuing gene and/or cell therapy for dystrophin-deficient cardiomyopathy in DMD/BMD patients.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animals
All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Missouri and were in accordance with NIH guidelines. All experimental mice were housed in a specific pathogen-free facility. BL10 (C57Bl/10SnJ) and mdx (C57Bl/10ScSn-Dmdmdx/J) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Me). Female carrier mice were generated by crossing BL10 and mdx mice.9

Histopathology Studies
Standard hematoxylin/eosin staining was used to reveal general histology. Fibrosis was evaluated by Masson trichrome staining according to a published protocol.10 Muscle calcification was examined with Alizarin red staining. Briefly, 10-µm muscle cryosections were stained in 2% Alizarin red (pH 4.2; no. A5533, Sigma, St Louis, Mo) for 2 minutes at room temperature. After serial dehydration in 70%, 90%, and 100% ethanol (10 seconds each) and a brief rinse in xylene, slides were mounted in Permount (no. SP15–100, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pa).

Immunostaining
Dystrophin was examined with three antibodies including a mouse monoclonal antibody against the C-terminal domain (Dys-2, 1:30; clone Dy8/6C5, IgG1; Novocastra, Newcastle, UK), a mouse monoclonal antibody against the rod domain (Manex50, 1:2000; clone 6A9, IgG1; a gift from Dr Glenn Morris, The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, UK),11 a rabbit polyclonal antibody against spectrin-like repeat 4 to 6 (1:400; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif). Utrophin was examined with a mouse monoclonal antibody against the utrophin N-terminal domain (VP-U579, 1:20; clone DRP3/20C5, IgG1; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, Calif). β-Dystroglycan was revealed with a mouse monoclonal antibody against the C terminus (NCL-b-DG, 1:50; clone 43DAG1/8D5, IgG2a; Novocastra). β-Sarcoglycan was revealed with a mouse monoclonal antibody (NCL-b-SARC, 1:50; clone 5B1, IgG1; Novocastra). Dystrobrevin was revealed with a mouse monoclonal antibody (1:200; clone 23, IgG1; no. 610766, BD Biosciences, San Diego, Calif). Syntrophin was revealed with a pan-syntrophin mouse monoclonal antibody that recognized the PDZ domain (ab11425, 1:200; clone 1351, IgG1; Abcam, Cambridge, Mass). Immunostaining was performed essentially as we described previously.12,13

Western Blot
Microsomal membrane preparation was prepared according to our published protocol.13 Protein (50 µg) was loaded in each lane on a 6% SDS–polyacrylamide gel. After electrophoresis, protein was transferred to a polyvinylidene diflouride membrane. Immunoblot was performed with the Dys-2 antibody (1:100).9 Protein loading was confirmed by Rapid blue staining of a duplicate gel (Geno Technology, St Louis, Mo).

Noninvasive Twelve-Lead ECG in Mouse
Mice were first anesthetized with isoflurane (4% induction, 1.5% maintenance) using an Isotec 3 vaporizer (Summit Medical Equipment Co, Bend, Ore). Mice were then placed on a thermo-controlled plate (37°C) and acclimated for 10 minutes before ECG recording. Five 29G needle electrodes (including 4 limb leads and 1 movable chest lead) and an ECG lead selector switch (Model MLA0112S) from AD Instruments (Colorado Springs) were used to sequentially record a full 12-lead ECG. Electrical signals from each lead were filtered and amplified by a single-channel BioAmp (Model ML132) from AD Instruments. Finally ECG tracings were analyzed using a PowerLab software–based ECG analysis module (AD Instruments). The signal-averaged ECG was calculated from a 1-minute continuous recording and used for quantitative analysis.

Pressure–Volume Loop Analysis of Heart Hemodynamics
Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane as described above. A closed-chest hemodynamic assay was performed by placing a 1.4 F Millar microtip pressure–volume (PV) catheter (SPR-839, Millar Instrument, Houston, Tex) into the left ventricle through the right carotid artery.9 Hemodynamic parameters were collected with the Millar Aria-1 PV conductance system at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz and analyzed with the PVAN software (Millar Instrument) according to instructions of the manufacturer. Some mice were challenged with dobutamine after baseline measurement. Briefly, mice were injected with 5 µg/g body weight (BW) dobutamine hydrochloride IP (D0676, Sigma). At 5 minutes postinjection, PV loop data were collected. Dosage of dobutamine and timing of data collection were experimentally determined to achieve maximal adrenergic challenge.

Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as means±SEM. Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS software (SPSS, Chicago, Ill). Statistical significance for multiple group comparison was determined by 1-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc analysis. Student t test was used for 2-group comparison. Difference was considered significant when P<0.05.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Twenty-One-Month-Old mdx Mice Show Dilated Cardiomyopathy
According to the known lifespan data for women (80 years) and female mice (27 months),14 21-month-old mice are equivalent to 62-year-old humans. Comparing with aged-matched normal and carrier mice, mdx mice were significantly emaciated. They lost one-third of their BW (Table). To determine whether old mdx mice undergo dilated cardiomyopathy, we first performed histopathology examination. We found obvious fibrosis and calcification (Figure 1). The ventricular chamber was also enlarged (Figure 1). Despite the morphological evidence of cardiomyopathy in old mdx mice, we did not see an increase in the heart weight (HW) to tibial length (TL) ratio or the ventricular weight (VW) to TL ratio (Table). As a matter of fact, the mdx mice had significantly lower HW/TL and VW/TL ratios than those of the normal mice (Table).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Table. Weight and Weight Ratios in Old Mice


Figure 1
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Myocardial fibrosis and calcification in old mdx mice are prevented in age-matched carrier mice. Representative photomicrographs of heart serial sections from old mdx (A), carrier (B), and BL10 (C) mice. Blue color in Masson trichrome staining reveals fibrosis. Red color in Alizarin red staining shows calcified tissues. High-power images are the boxed areas from the corresponding low-power photomicrographs. Irregular wall thickness, enlarged cavity, myocardial fibrosis, and calcification are only seen in mdx mouse hearts.

DMD/BMD patients often display characteristic ECG changes such as sinus tachycardia, shortened PR interval, prolonged QT interval, deep Q wave, and polyphasic R' wave.15–19 The physiological foundation for these alterations remains to be elucidated, but it may at least relate to myocardial fibrosis.18 We observed similar ECG changes in old mdx mice (Figure 2). Furthermore, the cardiomyopathic index, a ratio of QT/PQs, was significantly higher in old mdx mice (Figure 2).20


Figure 2
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Aged carrier mice show the characteristic ECG features of normal mice. A, Representative lead II ECG tracings. The PR intervals in all 3 strains and the R' wave in mdx mice are highlighted. B, Quantitative evaluation of the heart rate (HR), PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, and the cardiomyopathy index (C. Index) (a calculated value of QT interval/PQ segment) from lead II tracing. Lead I tracing was used to quantify the Q wave amplitude. Asterisk indicates that values in mdx are significantly different from those in BL10 and carrier mice. There is no statistical difference between BL10 and carrier mice.

Dilated cardiomyopathy is the classic clinical manifestation of dystrophin-deficient heart disease. It is characterized by ventricular chamber dilation and dysfunction. However, this has never been documented in mdx mice by catheter-based in vivo hemodynamic analysis. To further establish old mdx mice as a valid model for our study, we performed closed-chest hemodynamic measurement. Consistent with previous reports on dilated cardiomyopathy,21,22 we observed a marked rightward shift of the PV loop in aged mdx mice (Figure 3A). Chamber dilation also resulted in significant increase in both end-systolic and end-diastolic volume (Figure 3B and 3C). Impaired systolic function was reflected by a significant decrease in maximal pressure and the maximal rate of the left ventricular pressure development (dP/dtmax). Diastolic dysfunction was confirmed by 2 independent parameters of heart relaxation, a reduction in the minimal first derivative of left ventricular pressure (dP/dtmin) and an increase in the time constant of left ventricular isovolumetric pressure decay (Tau). Consequently, the overall heart function was compromised, as reflected by reduced stroke volume, ejection fraction, and cardiac output (Figure 3D).


Figure 3
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. The in vivo hemodynamic profiles of old mdx, carrier, and BL10 mice. A, Representative tracings of PV loop change during heart cycles. B, Quantitative analysis of systolic function. C, Quantitative analysis of diastolic function. D, Quantitative analysis of the overall cardiac performance. Asterisk indicates that values in mdx are significantly different from those in BL10 and carrier mice. There is no statistical difference between BL10 and carrier mice.

Mosaic Dystrophin Expression Normalizes Anatomical and Physiological Defects in Old mdx Heart
Having established a clear diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy in 21-month-old mdx mice, we next asked whether heart disease was prevented in age-matched carrier mice. On histopathology examination, the hearts of carrier mice were essentially indistinguishable from these of BL10 mice (Figure 1). There was no sign of fibrous tissue and/or calcium deposition in the myocardium nor was there abnormal ventricular chamber dilation. All of the anatomic parameters (such as HW, VW, HW/BW, VW/BW, HW/TL, and VW/TL ratios) were also normalized (Table). Besides structural analysis, we also characterized heart function in resting carrier mice. In a 12-lead ECG assay, we did not see any aberrant changes (Figure 2). The tracing was identical to that of the normal mice (Figure 2A). Quantitative evaluations of ECG parameters were also within the normal range (Figure 2B). In the closed-chest hemodynamic assay, we did not see any shift of the PV loops in carrier mice. The pattern overlapped perfectly with that from normal BL10 mice (Figure 3A). A detailed analysis revealed normal function during both systolic and diastolic phases of the cardiac cycle in carrier mice (Figure 3B through 3D). These results suggest that in contrast to old mdx mice, old carrier mice did not develop dilated cardiomyopathy.

To further evaluate cardiac health in old carrier mice, we searched for potential microscopic changes. Among 19 old carrier mouse hearts, we found 4 (21%) with focal myocardial inflammation (Figure 4A). Interestingly, normal resting hemodynamics was preserved in these mice (Figure 4B). Positive inotropic stimulation often unmasks hidden cardiac dysfunction. We therefore performed a dobutamine challenge test. In both BL10 and carrier mice, dobutamine administration significantly increased ejection fraction (Figure 4C). However, there was no difference in the majority of the poststress hemodynamic parameters between BL10 and carrier mice (Figure 4D). The only noticeable change was the maximal systolic pressure. It was significantly higher in BL10 mice (Figure 4D).


Figure 4
View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Hemodynamic performance in old carrier mice is not altered by focal inflammation, but it is minimally compromised by dobutamine stress. A, Subset of old carrier mice showed mild inflammation. The images show representative heart hematoxylin/eosin staining of an old carrier mouse with scatted inflammatory foci in both left and right ventricular walls. High-power images are the boxed areas from the corresponding low-power photomicrographs, respectively. B, Quantification of time-associated pressure changes during systole (dP/dtmax) and diastole (dP/dtmin) in old carrier mice. There is no statistical difference between the mice with and without mild inflammation. C, Dobutamine stress was used to unmask cardiac defect in old carrier mice. Dobutamine administration increased ejection fraction in old BL10 and carrier mice. Asterisk indicates that poststress values are significantly different from those before dobutamine challenge. D, Quantitative comparison of systolic (maximal pressure and dP/dtmax) and diastolic (tau and dP/dtmin) hemodynamic changes and overall heart performance (stroke volume and cardiac output) in dobutamine-stressed BL10 and carrier mice. No statistical differences were seen between BL10 and carrier mice, except for the maximal pressure. Asterisk indicates that the carrier mice had significantly lower maximal pressure than that of BL10 mice.

Taken together, old carrier mice were free from dilated cardiomyopathy despite a mild inflammation in some mice and minor systolic defect in stress test.

The Lack of Cardiomyopathy in Carrier Mice Is Not Attributable to Selective Preservation and/or Expansion of Dystrophin-Positive Cells
A preferential retention and/or expansion of dystrophin-positive cells could explain the apparently normal cardiac phenotype in aged carrier mice. The growth advantage of dystrophin-positive cells has been shown in mdx skeletal muscle.23 To delineate the mechanisms underlying heart protection in carrier mice, we quantified the number of dystrophin-positive cells in the heart.

We first counted revertant cardiomyocytes in young and old mdx mice. In these revertant cells, the open-reading frame is restored after the mutated exon is skipped during transcription processing.23 We observed single and clonal revertant cells in both young and old mdx hearts (Figure 5A). The total number of revertant cardiomyocytes was not significantly different between young and old mice (Figure 5B).


Figure 5
View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Quantification of dystrophin expression in the hearts of mdx and carrier mice. A, Representative photomicrographs of single and clonal revertant cardiomyocytes in the mdx hearts. Scale bar applies to all images. B, Morphometric quantification of dystrophin-positive revertant fibers in heart sections. There is no statistical difference between young and old mdx mice. C, Representative dystrophin immunofluorescence staining in the hearts of carrier mice. Scale bar applies to both images. D, Morphometric quantification of dystrophin-positive cells in heart sections. There is no statistical difference between young and old carrier mice. E, Representative dystrophin Western blots of old mouse hearts (from 7 independent experiments). Each lane represents 50 µg of microsomal preparation from the heart. The loading control is rapid blue staining of a duplicate gel. Dys indicates dystrophin; Pos, positive; young, 3 months old; old, 21 months old.

We next studied the carrier mouse heart. Mosaic dystrophin expression was seen in both young and old mice (Figure 5C and Figure I in the online data supplement at http://circres.ahajournals.org). On average, 53.15±% and 54.39±4.88% cardiomyocytes were dystrophin positive in young and old carrier mice, respectively (Figure 5D). Morphometric quantification was further confirmed by Western blot (Figure 5E). In summary, we did not see a selective preservation and/or expansion of dystrophin-positive cardiomyocytes in mdx and carrier mice.

Upregulated Utrophin Fills in the Gap in the Heart of Carrier Mice
To further understand myocardial protection in carrier mice, we examined utrophin expression in the heart. Utrophin is a structural and functional homolog of dystrophin. Utrophin upregulation has contributed, at least in part, to the mild skeletal muscle pathology in mdx mice.24,25 Consistent with previous reports (reviewed elsewhere2), utrophin was absent in the BL10 mouse heart but was moderately upregulated in all cardiomyocytes in mdx mice (supplemental Figure II). In sharp contrast to the all-or-none pattern in the BL10 and mdx hearts, utrophin expression in the hearts of carrier mice showed a striking complementary profile. Utrophin was upregulated in dystrophin-negative areas but not in dystrophin-positive areas (Figure 6A and 6B). Utrophin upregulation also led to the reassembly of the dystrophin–glycoprotein complex (DGC) in dystrophin-negative cardiomyocytes in carrier mice. Although the DGC was restored in all cardiomyocytes in carrier mice, immunostaining intensity was much higher in dystrophin-positive cells than that in utrophin-positive cells (Figure 6C).


Figure 6
View larger version (77K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Immunofluorescence analysis of dystrophin, utrophin, and the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex in the hearts of carrier mice. A and B, Representative immunofluorescence staining photomicrographs of serial heart sections from carrier mice. One section was stained with a dystrophin antibody, and its adjacent section was stained with an utrophin antibody. High-power images are the boxed areas from the corresponding low-power photomicrographs. D indicates regions enriched with dystrophin-positive cardiomyocytes; U, regions enriched with utrophin-positive cardiomyocytes. Utrophin is upregulated in dystrophin-negative areas. C, Representative serial immunostaining in the hearts of 21-month-old carrier mice. Dys indicates dystrophin; Utro, utrophin; βDG, β-dystroglycan; βSG, β-sarcoglycan; Syn, syntrophin; Dbr, dystrobrevin.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
A fundamental question in gene and/or cell therapy of dystrophin-deficient cardiomyopathy is whether one needs to correct every heart cell before organ level amelioration can be achieved. The presence of cardiomyopathy in DMD/BMD carriers seems to suggest that a mosaic expression is not sufficient to prevent heart disease. Because some cardiomyocytes will inevitably be missed in gene and/or cell therapy in patients, there is an urgent need to determine whether mosaic expression can benefit DMD/BMD patients.

The lack of a valid mouse model for dystrophin-deficient cardiomyopathy has hindered research in this field. The naturally occurring mdx mouse is the classic dystrophin-null model. Its value in dystrophin-deficient cardiomyopathy study has been revisited recently.2,9,26–30 These studies have confirmed stress-induced cardiomyopathy in young mdx mice (≤8 months old) and abnormal histopathology/echocardiography/ECG in moderately aged mice ({approx}12 to 15 months old). Comprehensive evaluation of old mdx mice (≥18 months old, equivalent to ≥53 years of age in human) is lacking. Most importantly, none of the existing studies demonstrates the typical hemodynamic changes seen in dilated cardiomyopathy.9,27,29

To evaluate therapeutic implication of mosaic expression, we first established a phenotypic model of dilated cardiomyopathy. In the hearts of 21-month-old mdx mice, we observed myocardial fibrosis, calcification, and an irregularly enlarged ventricular chamber (Figure 1 and Table). ECG examination also revealed patient-like changes, including the appearance of R' waves and deep Q waves, a reduction in PR interval, and a prolongation in QT interval (Figure 2).19 The most revealing findings are in the closed-chest hemodynamic assay. We detected the diagnostic PV loop right shift and ventricular dysfunction (Figure 3). This is the first definitive demonstration of dilated cardiomyopathy in mdx mice.

The ultimate goal of this study was to determine whether mosaic expression can prevent cardiomyopathy. We have recently shown full hemodynamic protection in young carrier mice in an artificially stressed model.9 However, the absence of a true dilated cardiomyopathy in young mdx mice has limited extrapolation of this finding to human patients. To truly evaluate the effect of mosaic expression, we have now studied old symptomatic mice. In contrast to the reported heart disease in human carriers, the aged carrier mice were exempted from dilated cardiomyopathy. Except for mild inflammation and a minor defect in a dobutamine stress test, the hearts of old carrier mice were essentially normal. They had normal weight and weight ratios and normal resting ECG and hemodynamics (Figures 1 through 3UpUp). These results strongly suggest that, at least in mice, mosaic dystrophin expression is sufficient to prevent dilated cardiomyopathy.

It has been well established that the skeletal muscle of human carriers and carrier mice is exempt from dystrophy. This is attributable to the syncytial nature of skeletal muscle structure. It allows the spreading of dystrophin from a single expressing nucleus to the entire fiber. Eventually, every fiber becomes dystrophin positive (supplemental Figures III and IV). A similar mechanism does not exist in the heart. The intercalated disks prevent dystrophin spreading between the singly nucleated cardiomyocytes. It has been shown in skeletal muscle that dystrophin-positive revertant cells are more resistant to degeneration than dystrophin-null myofibers.23 If the same principle works in the heart, we hypothesize that dystrophin-positive cardiomyocytes seen in young carrier mice would eventually dominate the heart. This relative increase in dystrophin-positive cells would explain the lack of cardiomyopathy in old carrier mice. To test this hypothesis, we quantified the number of dystrophin-positive fibers in the heart. Neither revertant cardiomyocytes in mdx mice nor dystrophin-positive cardiomyocytes in carrier mice showed an age-associated increase in number (Figure 5). This result excludes selective survival/expansion of dystrophin-positive cells as the underlying mechanism.

Utrophin shares structural similarity with dystrophin and has been actively pursued as a therapeutic molecule for DMD/BMD (reviewed elsewhere31). We next examined whether utrophin upregulation played a role. Similar to previous reports in young mdx mice and DMD/BMD patients,32,33 we found uniform utrophin upregulation in the hearts of old mdx mice (supplemental Figure II). Furthermore, we observed a minimal, albeit detectable, level of the DGC at the sarcolemma in the mdx heart (supplemental Figure IIB). Why does the uniformly expressed utrophin not confer protection in the mdx heart? One apparent explanation could be that the upregulated utrophin did not provide sufficient mechanical support. Several studies have directly measured muscle force in mdx heart. Sapp et al have shown a contractile defect in the mdx atria.34 Janssen et al have measured ventricular muscle force.35 Using the developed force as an index, they show significantly lower developed force in mdx ventricle when compared with normal ventricle. Knocking out utrophin further depresses ventricular developed force in dystrophin/utrophin double knockout mice.35 Thus, utrophin upregulation offers only a weak mechanical support to the mdx heart, and it is insufficient to stop dilated cardiomyopathy (Figure 7).


Figure 7
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 7. Complementary dystrophin/utrophin expression in carrier mouse heart prevents dilated cardiomyopathy. In BL10 mice, dystrophin is expressed in every single heart cell. It provides strong mechanical support and ensures normal heart structure and function. Loss of dystrophin in mdx mice is accompanied by a moderate utrophin upregulation. This provides a weak mechanical support, but it is not sufficient to stop dilated cardiomyopathy when mice get old. In carrier mice, dystrophin is present in 50% cells and utrophin is upregulated in remaining cells. Dystrophin-positive cells may act like steel bars in reinforced concrete to increase the overall strength of the heart. Consequently, heart structure and function are maintained in aged carrier mice.

Utrophin upregulation in the carrier mouse heart had a different pattern. It occurred only in dystrophin-negative cardiomyocytes (Figure 6). The remaining cardiomyocytes ({approx}50%) expressed normal level dystrophin. Cells expressing dystrophin contained normal concentration of the DGC components, whereas cells expressing utrophin had a reduced yet intact DGC (Figure 6C). Based on these findings, we propose that the mosaic pattern of dystrophin-positive cells in carrier mice may act like steel bars in reinforced concrete and ultimately increase the overall strength of the entire heart (Figure 7). Taken together, our results have provided correlative evidence that in the background of moderate utrophin upregulation, 50% dystrophin-positive cardiomyocytes are sufficient to prevent dilated cardiomyopathy. Future studies in utrophin/dystrophin double knockout mice and/or cardiac-specific utrophin transgenic mice may further clarify the role utrophin plays in the heart.

Perhaps a more pressing issue is why human carriers are not protected. To answer this question, we first need to point out that severe dilated cardiomyopathy is actually a low incidence problem in DMD/BMD carriers. On average, only {approx}10% carriers develop severe heart disease.36,37 The majority have no cardiac problems, even at 55 years of age.38 The reason for the selective involvement of certain patients is not understood. It may involve a number of genetic, environmental, nutritional, and other yet undefined triggering factors. Future studies in this area may help us to better understand cardiac disease in DMD/BMD patients and carriers.

Taken together, we have demonstrated a complete prevention of cardiomyopathy through 50% mosaic dystrophin expression in old carrier mice. Because 100% correction is not feasible in gene and/or cell therapy, our results have provided a strong theoretical basis for the clinical usefulness of these novel treatments. Considering the fact that utrophin upregulation is a common finding in the hearts of DMD/BMD patients, achieving a full cardiac recovery may be an attainable goal in gene and/or cell therapy of dystrophin-deficient cardiomyopathy, especially when treatment is performed in utero or in neonatal patients before heart disease develops.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Dr Jeffrey Skimming and Tammy Strawn for helpful discussions regarding the hemodynamic assay. We thank Drs Glenn Morris and Lam Le for providing some dystrophin monoclonal antibodies.

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by NIH grant AR-49419 (to D.D.) and by the Muscular Dystrophy Association (to D.D.). B.B. was partially supported by NIH training grant GM 008396.

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
*Both authors contributed equally to this work. Back

Original received March 29, 2007; resubmission received August 29, 2007; revised resubmission received September 19, 2007; accepted October 16, 2007.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Cox GF, Kunkel LM. Dystrophies and heart disease. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1997; 12: 329–343.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Duan D. Challenges and opportunities in dystrophin-deficient cardiomyopathy gene therapy. Hum Mol Genet. 2006; 15: R253–R261.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Baxter P. Treatment of the heart in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006; 48: 163.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Blankinship MJ, Gregorevic P, Chamberlain JS. Gene therapy strategies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy utilizing recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors. Mol Ther. 2006; 13: 241–249.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Chamberlain JS. Stem-cell biology: a move in the right direction. Nature. 2006; 444: 552–553.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Hoffman EP, Fischbeck KH, Brown RH, Johnson M, Medori R, Loike JD, Harris JB, Waterston R, Brooke M, Specht L. Characterization of dystrophin in muscle-biopsy specimens from patients with Duchenne’s or Becker’s muscular dystrophy. N Engl J Med. 1988; 318: 1363–1368.[Abstract]
  7. Kunkel LM, Hoffman EP. Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy: a short overview of the gene, the protein, and current diagnostics. Br Med Bull. 1989; 45: 630–643.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Liu M, Yue Y, Harper SQ, Grange RW, Chamberlain JS, Duan D. Adeno-associated virus-mediated micro-dystrophin expression protects young Mdx muscle from contraction-induced injury. Mol Ther. 2005; 11: 245–256.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Yue Y, Skimming JW, Liu M, Strawn T, Duan D. Full-length dystrophin expression in half of the heart cells ameliorates beta-isoproterenol-induced cardiomyopathy in mdx mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2004; 13: 1669–1675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Yue Y, Liu M, Duan D. C-terminal truncated microdystrophin recruits dystrobrevin and syntrophin to the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein complex and reduces muscular dystrophy in symptomatic utrophin/dystrophin double knock-out mice. Mol Ther. 2006; 14: 79–87.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Thanh LT, Nguyen TM, Helliwell TR, Morris GE. Characterization of revertant muscle fibers in Duchenne muscular dystrophy, using exon-specific monoclonal antibodies against dystrophin. Am J Hum Genet. 1995; 56: 725–731.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Yue Y, Li Z, Harper SQ, Davisson RL, Chamberlain JS, Duan D. Microdystrophin gene therapy of cardiomyopathy restores dystrophin-glycoprotein complex and improves sarcolemma integrity in the Mdx mouse heart. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1626–1632.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Lai Y, Yue Y, Liu M, Ghosh A, Engelhardt JF, Chamberlain JS, Duan D. Efficient in vivo gene expression by trans-splicing adeno-associated viral vectors. Nat Biotechnol. 2005; 23: 1435–1439.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Chamberlain JS, Metzger J, Reyes M, Townsend D, Faulkner JA. Dystrophin-deficient mdx mice display a reduced life span and are susceptible to spontaneous rhabdomyosarcoma. FASEB J. 2007; 21: 2195–2204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Perloff JK, Roberts WC, de Leon Jr AC, O’Doherty D. The distinctive electrocardiogram of Duchenne’s progressive muscular dystrophy. An electrocardiographic-pathologic correlative study. Am J Med. 1967; 42: 179–188.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Sanyal SK, Johnson WW, Thapar MK, Pitner SE. An ultrastructural basis for electrocardiographic alterations associated with Duchenne’s progressive muscular dystrophy. Circulation. 1978; 57: 1122–1129.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Nigro G, Comi LI, Politano L. Electrocardiographic evaluation of the P-type stage of dystrophic cardiomyopathy. Cardiomyology. 1984; 3: 45–58.
  18. Perloff JK. Cardiac rhythm and conduction in Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy: a prospective study of 20 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984; 3: 1263–1268.[Abstract]
  19. Emery AEH, Muntoni F. Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
  20. Nigro G, Comi LI, Politano L, Nigro G. Cardiomyopathies associated with muscular dystrophies. In: Engel A and Franzini-Armstrong C, eds. Myology: Basic and Clinical. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004: 1239–1256.
  21. Schreuder JJ, Steendijk P, van der Veen FH, Alfieri O, van der Nagel T, Lorusso R, van Dantzig JM, Prenger KB, Baan J, Wellens HJ, Batista RJ. Acute and short-term effects of partial left ventriculectomy in dilated cardiomyopathy: assessment by pressure-volume loops. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 2104–2114.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Georgakopoulos D, Kass DA. Protocols for hemodynamic assessment of transgenic mice in vivo. Methods Mol Biol. 2003; 219: 233–243.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Lu QL, Morris GE, Wilton SD, Ly T, Artem’yeva OV, Strong P, Partridge TA. Massive idiosyncratic exon skipping corrects the nonsense mutation in dystrophic mouse muscle and produces functional revertant fibers by clonal expansion. J Cell Biol. 2000; 148: 985–996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Deconinck AE, Rafael JA, Skinner JA, Brown SC, Potter AC, Metzinger L, Watt DJ, Dickson JG, Tinsley JM, Davies KE. Utrophin-dystrophin-deficient mice as a model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Cell. 1997; 90: 717–727.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Grady RM, Teng H, Nichol MC, Cunningham JC, Wilkinson RS, Sanes JR. Skeletal and cardiac myopathies in mice lacking utrophin and dystrophin: a model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Cell. 1997; 90: 729–738.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Danialou G, Comtois AS, Dudley R, Karpati G, Vincent G, Des Rosiers C, Petrof BJ. Dystrophin-deficient cardiomyocytes are abnormally vulnerable to mechanical stress-induced contractile failure and injury. FASEB J. 2001; 15: 1655–1657.[Free Full Text]
  27. Quinlan JG, Hahn HS, Wong BL, Lorenz JN, Wenisch AS, Levin LS. Evolution of the mdx mouse cardiomyopathy: physiological and morphological findings. Neuromuscul Disord. 2004; 14: 491–496.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Wehling-Henricks M, Jordan MC, Roos KP, Deng B, Tidball JG. Cardiomyopathy in dystrophin-deficient hearts is prevented by expression of a neuronal nitric oxide synthase transgene in the myocardium. Hum Mol Genet. 2005; 14: 1921–1933.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Yasuda S, Townsend D, Michele DE, Favre EG, Day SM, Metzger JM. Dystrophic heart failure blocked by membrane sealant poloxamer. Nature. 2005; 436: 1025–1029.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Van Erp C, Irwin NG, Hoey AJ. Long-term administration of pirfenidone improves cardiac function in mdx mice. Muscle Nerve. 2006; 34: 327–334.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Khurana TS, Davies KE. Pharmacological strategies for muscular dystrophy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003; 2: 379–390.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Behr TM, Fischer P, Mudra H, Theisen K, Spes C, Uberfuhr P, Muller-Felber W, Pongratz DE, Angermann C. Upregulation of utrophin in the myocardium of a carrier of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Eur Heart J. 1997; 18: 699–700.[Free Full Text]
  33. Fanin M, Melacini P, Angelini C, Danieli GA. Could utrophin rescue the myocardium of patients with dystrophin gene mutations? J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1999; 31: 1501–1508.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Sapp JL, Bobet J, Howlett SE. Contractile properties of myocardium are altered in dystrophin- deficient mdx mice. J Neurol Sci. 1996; 142: 17–24.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Janssen PM, Hiranandani N, Mays TA, Rafael-Fortney JA. Utrophin deficiency worsens cardiac contractile dysfunction present in dystrophin-deficient mdx mice. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005; 289: H2373–H2378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Bushby K, Muntoni F, Bourke JP. 107th ENMC international workshop: the management of cardiac involvement in muscular dystrophy and myotonic dystrophy. 7th-9th June 2002, Naarden, the Netherlands. Neuromuscul Disord. 2003; 13: 166–172.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Muntoni F. Cardiomyopathy in muscular dystrophies. Curr Opin Neurol. 2003; 16: 577–583.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Grain L, Cortina-Borja M, Forfar C, Hilton-Jones D, Hopkin J, Burch M. Cardiac abnormalities and skeletal muscle weakness in carriers of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies and controls. Neuromuscul Disord. 2001; 11: 186–191.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/121    most recent
CIRCRESAHA.107.162982v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bostick, B.
Right arrow Articles by Duan, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bostick, B.
Right arrow Articles by Duan, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other myocardial biology
Right arrow Other heart failure
Right arrow Gene therapy
Right arrow Genetics of cardiovascular disease
Right arrow Other Treatment