| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integrative Physiology |
From the Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Missouri, Columbia.
Correspondence to Dongsheng Duan, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Missouri, School of Medicine, One Hospital Dr, M610G, MSB, Columbia, MO 65212. E-mail duand{at}missouri.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: cardiomyopathy gene therapy myocardium genetics heart disease
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pathology in the heart and the diaphragm determines the life span in DMD/BMD patients. Until recently, approximately 80% to 90% of DMD patients died from respiratory failure because of a weak diaphragm. With improved respiratory care, heart-related death has become more frequent, even approaching 40% in some studies.3 Currently, symptomatic management is the only treatment option. The advent of gene and cell therapies brings the hope of a cure for DMD/BMD.2 In gene therapy, the mutated gene is replaced and/or repaired.4 In cell therapy, a population of functional stem cells is introduced to regenerate muscle.5 The fundamental idea behind these novel therapies is to produce enough dystrophin-expressing muscle cells to halt or reverse the dystrophic process.
To completely transduce and/or regenerate every single muscle cell may not be realistic. It is thus critical to determine whether mosaic dystrophin expression in a subpopulation of cells can fulfill the physiologic need. Fifty-percent mosaic expression has been shown to ameliorate severe skeletal muscle disease in human patients.6,7 We recently observed similar findings in mice with adenoassociated virus–mediated expression of a highly abbreviated microdystrophin gene.8 Despite the importance and need for treating dystrophic cardiomyopathy, very few studies have been performed to determine whether mosaic dystrophin expression benefits the heart.
To address this issue, we previously examined heart function in 3-month-old mdx mice and carrier mice. mdx mice are naturally occurring dystrophin-null mice found in the C57Bl/10 (BL10) background but they do not display classic dystrophic cardiomyopathy such as prominent fibrosis at young age. However under positive inotropic stress, the young mdx hearts show obvious sarcolemma damage as well as reduced hemodynamic performance.9 Carrier mice express dystrophin in only half of the heart cells. Surprisingly, stress-induced heart damage was completely normalized in young carrier mice.9 Although this is an informative result, it may not be applicable to patients who, unlike young mdx mice, do experience dilated cardiomyopathy. Whether mosaic expression can indeed prevent cardiomyopathy remains an unanswered question.
Partial/mosaic correction is the most likely outcome of gene and/or cell therapy for DMD/BMD heart disease. It is therefore important to determine whether an incomplete therapy can lead to clinically meaningful improvement in the heart. To answer this question, we first established a phenotypic cardiomyopathy model in 21-month-old mdx mice. We then evaluated heart structure and function in age-matched carrier mice. Mosaic dystrophin expression in half cardiomyocytes prevented the development of cardiomyopathy in old carrier mice. Additional studies showed utrophin upregulation in dystrophin-negative cardiomyocytes. Taken together, we have demonstrated, for the first time, that mosaic dystrophin expression was sufficient to maintain healthy hearts in a phenotypic model. Our data strongly support further pursuing gene and/or cell therapy for dystrophin-deficient cardiomyopathy in DMD/BMD patients.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Histopathology Studies
Standard hematoxylin/eosin staining was used to reveal general histology. Fibrosis was evaluated by Masson trichrome staining according to a published protocol.10 Muscle calcification was examined with Alizarin red staining. Briefly, 10-µm muscle cryosections were stained in 2% Alizarin red (pH 4.2; no. A5533, Sigma, St Louis, Mo) for 2 minutes at room temperature. After serial dehydration in 70%, 90%, and 100% ethanol (10 seconds each) and a brief rinse in xylene, slides were mounted in Permount (no. SP15–100, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pa).
Immunostaining
Dystrophin was examined with three antibodies including a mouse monoclonal antibody against the C-terminal domain (Dys-2, 1:30; clone Dy8/6C5, IgG1; Novocastra, Newcastle, UK), a mouse monoclonal antibody against the rod domain (Manex50, 1:2000; clone 6A9, IgG1; a gift from Dr Glenn Morris, The Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, UK),11 a rabbit polyclonal antibody against spectrin-like repeat 4 to 6 (1:400; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif). Utrophin was examined with a mouse monoclonal antibody against the utrophin N-terminal domain (VP-U579, 1:20; clone DRP3/20C5, IgG1; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, Calif). β-Dystroglycan was revealed with a mouse monoclonal antibody against the C terminus (NCL-b-DG, 1:50; clone 43DAG1/8D5, IgG2a; Novocastra). β-Sarcoglycan was revealed with a mouse monoclonal antibody (NCL-b-SARC, 1:50; clone 5B1, IgG1; Novocastra). Dystrobrevin was revealed with a mouse monoclonal antibody (1:200; clone 23, IgG1; no. 610766, BD Biosciences, San Diego, Calif). Syntrophin was revealed with a pan-syntrophin mouse monoclonal antibody that recognized the PDZ domain (ab11425, 1:200; clone 1351, IgG1; Abcam, Cambridge, Mass). Immunostaining was performed essentially as we described previously.12,13
Western Blot
Microsomal membrane preparation was prepared according to our published protocol.13 Protein (50 µg) was loaded in each lane on a 6% SDS–polyacrylamide gel. After electrophoresis, protein was transferred to a polyvinylidene diflouride membrane. Immunoblot was performed with the Dys-2 antibody (1:100).9 Protein loading was confirmed by Rapid blue staining of a duplicate gel (Geno Technology, St Louis, Mo).
Noninvasive Twelve-Lead ECG in Mouse
Mice were first anesthetized with isoflurane (4% induction, 1.5% maintenance) using an Isotec 3 vaporizer (Summit Medical Equipment Co, Bend, Ore). Mice were then placed on a thermo-controlled plate (37°C) and acclimated for 10 minutes before ECG recording. Five 29G needle electrodes (including 4 limb leads and 1 movable chest lead) and an ECG lead selector switch (Model MLA0112S) from AD Instruments (Colorado Springs) were used to sequentially record a full 12-lead ECG. Electrical signals from each lead were filtered and amplified by a single-channel BioAmp (Model ML132) from AD Instruments. Finally ECG tracings were analyzed using a PowerLab software–based ECG analysis module (AD Instruments). The signal-averaged ECG was calculated from a 1-minute continuous recording and used for quantitative analysis.
Pressure–Volume Loop Analysis of Heart Hemodynamics
Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane as described above. A closed-chest hemodynamic assay was performed by placing a 1.4 F Millar microtip pressure–volume (PV) catheter (SPR-839, Millar Instrument, Houston, Tex) into the left ventricle through the right carotid artery.9 Hemodynamic parameters were collected with the Millar Aria-1 PV conductance system at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz and analyzed with the PVAN software (Millar Instrument) according to instructions of the manufacturer. Some mice were challenged with dobutamine after baseline measurement. Briefly, mice were injected with 5 µg/g body weight (BW) dobutamine hydrochloride IP (D0676, Sigma). At 5 minutes postinjection, PV loop data were collected. Dosage of dobutamine and timing of data collection were experimentally determined to achieve maximal adrenergic challenge.
Statistical Analysis
Data are presented as means±SEM. Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS software (SPSS, Chicago, Ill). Statistical significance for multiple group comparison was determined by 1-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc analysis. Student t test was used for 2-group comparison. Difference was considered significant when P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
DMD/BMD patients often display characteristic ECG changes such as sinus tachycardia, shortened PR interval, prolonged QT interval, deep Q wave, and polyphasic R' wave.15–19 The physiological foundation for these alterations remains to be elucidated, but it may at least relate to myocardial fibrosis.18 We observed similar ECG changes in old mdx mice (Figure 2). Furthermore, the cardiomyopathic index, a ratio of QT/PQs, was significantly higher in old mdx mice (Figure 2).20
|
Dilated cardiomyopathy is the classic clinical manifestation of dystrophin-deficient heart disease. It is characterized by ventricular chamber dilation and dysfunction. However, this has never been documented in mdx mice by catheter-based in vivo hemodynamic analysis. To further establish old mdx mice as a valid model for our study, we performed closed-chest hemodynamic measurement. Consistent with previous reports on dilated cardiomyopathy,21,22 we observed a marked rightward shift of the PV loop in aged mdx mice (Figure 3A). Chamber dilation also resulted in significant increase in both end-systolic and end-diastolic volume (Figure 3B and 3C). Impaired systolic function was reflected by a significant decrease in maximal pressure and the maximal rate of the left ventricular pressure development (dP/dtmax). Diastolic dysfunction was confirmed by 2 independent parameters of heart relaxation, a reduction in the minimal first derivative of left ventricular pressure (dP/dtmin) and an increase in the time constant of left ventricular isovolumetric pressure decay (Tau). Consequently, the overall heart function was compromised, as reflected by reduced stroke volume, ejection fraction, and cardiac output (Figure 3D).
|
Mosaic Dystrophin Expression Normalizes Anatomical and Physiological Defects in Old mdx Heart
Having established a clear diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy in 21-month-old mdx mice, we next asked whether heart disease was prevented in age-matched carrier mice. On histopathology examination, the hearts of carrier mice were essentially indistinguishable from these of BL10 mice (Figure 1). There was no sign of fibrous tissue and/or calcium deposition in the myocardium nor was there abnormal ventricular chamber dilation. All of the anatomic parameters (such as HW, VW, HW/BW, VW/BW, HW/TL, and VW/TL ratios) were also normalized (Table). Besides structural analysis, we also characterized heart function in resting carrier mice. In a 12-lead ECG assay, we did not see any aberrant changes (Figure 2). The tracing was identical to that of the normal mice (Figure 2A). Quantitative evaluations of ECG parameters were also within the normal range (Figure 2B). In the closed-chest hemodynamic assay, we did not see any shift of the PV loops in carrier mice. The pattern overlapped perfectly with that from normal BL10 mice (Figure 3A). A detailed analysis revealed normal function during both systolic and diastolic phases of the cardiac cycle in carrier mice (Figure 3B through 3D). These results suggest that in contrast to old mdx mice, old carrier mice did not develop dilated cardiomyopathy.
To further evaluate cardiac health in old carrier mice, we searched for potential microscopic changes. Among 19 old carrier mouse hearts, we found 4 (21%) with focal myocardial inflammation (Figure 4A). Interestingly, normal resting hemodynamics was preserved in these mice (Figure 4B). Positive inotropic stimulation often unmasks hidden cardiac dysfunction. We therefore performed a dobutamine challenge test. In both BL10 and carrier mice, dobutamine administration significantly increased ejection fraction (Figure 4C). However, there was no difference in the majority of the poststress hemodynamic parameters between BL10 and carrier mice (Figure 4D). The only noticeable change was the maximal systolic pressure. It was significantly higher in BL10 mice (Figure 4D).
|
Taken together, old carrier mice were free from dilated cardiomyopathy despite a mild inflammation in some mice and minor systolic defect in stress test.
The Lack of Cardiomyopathy in Carrier Mice Is Not Attributable to Selective Preservation and/or Expansion of Dystrophin-Positive Cells
A preferential retention and/or expansion of dystrophin-positive cells could explain the apparently normal cardiac phenotype in aged carrier mice. The growth advantage of dystrophin-positive cells has been shown in mdx skeletal muscle.23 To delineate the mechanisms underlying heart protection in carrier mice, we quantified the number of dystrophin-positive cells in the heart.
We first counted revertant cardiomyocytes in young and old mdx mice. In these revertant cells, the open-reading frame is restored after the mutated exon is skipped during transcription processing.23 We observed single and clonal revertant cells in both young and old mdx hearts (Figure 5A). The total number of revertant cardiomyocytes was not significantly different between young and old mice (Figure 5B).
|
We next studied the carrier mouse heart. Mosaic dystrophin expression was seen in both young and old mice (Figure 5C and Figure I in the online data supplement at http://circres.ahajournals.org). On average, 53.15±% and 54.39±4.88% cardiomyocytes were dystrophin positive in young and old carrier mice, respectively (Figure 5D). Morphometric quantification was further confirmed by Western blot (Figure 5E). In summary, we did not see a selective preservation and/or expansion of dystrophin-positive cardiomyocytes in mdx and carrier mice.
Upregulated Utrophin Fills in the Gap in the Heart of Carrier Mice
To further understand myocardial protection in carrier mice, we examined utrophin expression in the heart. Utrophin is a structural and functional homolog of dystrophin. Utrophin upregulation has contributed, at least in part, to the mild skeletal muscle pathology in mdx mice.24,25 Consistent with previous reports (reviewed elsewhere2), utrophin was absent in the BL10 mouse heart but was moderately upregulated in all cardiomyocytes in mdx mice (supplemental Figure II). In sharp contrast to the all-or-none pattern in the BL10 and mdx hearts, utrophin expression in the hearts of carrier mice showed a striking complementary profile. Utrophin was upregulated in dystrophin-negative areas but not in dystrophin-positive areas (Figure 6A and 6B). Utrophin upregulation also led to the reassembly of the dystrophin–glycoprotein complex (DGC) in dystrophin-negative cardiomyocytes in carrier mice. Although the DGC was restored in all cardiomyocytes in carrier mice, immunostaining intensity was much higher in dystrophin-positive cells than that in utrophin-positive cells (Figure 6C).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The lack of a valid mouse model for dystrophin-deficient cardiomyopathy has hindered research in this field. The naturally occurring mdx mouse is the classic dystrophin-null model. Its value in dystrophin-deficient cardiomyopathy study has been revisited recently.2,9,26–30 These studies have confirmed stress-induced cardiomyopathy in young mdx mice (
8 months old) and abnormal histopathology/echocardiography/ECG in moderately aged mice (
12 to 15 months old). Comprehensive evaluation of old mdx mice (
18 months old, equivalent to
53 years of age in human) is lacking. Most importantly, none of the existing studies demonstrates the typical hemodynamic changes seen in dilated cardiomyopathy.9,27,29
To evaluate therapeutic implication of mosaic expression, we first established a phenotypic model of dilated cardiomyopathy. In the hearts of 21-month-old mdx mice, we observed myocardial fibrosis, calcification, and an irregularly enlarged ventricular chamber (Figure 1 and Table). ECG examination also revealed patient-like changes, including the appearance of R' waves and deep Q waves, a reduction in PR interval, and a prolongation in QT interval (Figure 2).19 The most revealing findings are in the closed-chest hemodynamic assay. We detected the diagnostic PV loop right shift and ventricular dysfunction (Figure 3). This is the first definitive demonstration of dilated cardiomyopathy in mdx mice.
The ultimate goal of this study was to determine whether mosaic expression can prevent cardiomyopathy. We have recently shown full hemodynamic protection in young carrier mice in an artificially stressed model.9 However, the absence of a true dilated cardiomyopathy in young mdx mice has limited extrapolation of this finding to human patients. To truly evaluate the effect of mosaic expression, we have now studied old symptomatic mice. In contrast to the reported heart disease in human carriers, the aged carrier mice were exempted from dilated cardiomyopathy. Except for mild inflammation and a minor defect in a dobutamine stress test, the hearts of old carrier mice were essentially normal. They had normal weight and weight ratios and normal resting ECG and hemodynamics (Figures 1 through 3![]()
). These results strongly suggest that, at least in mice, mosaic dystrophin expression is sufficient to prevent dilated cardiomyopathy.
It has been well established that the skeletal muscle of human carriers and carrier mice is exempt from dystrophy. This is attributable to the syncytial nature of skeletal muscle structure. It allows the spreading of dystrophin from a single expressing nucleus to the entire fiber. Eventually, every fiber becomes dystrophin positive (supplemental Figures III and IV). A similar mechanism does not exist in the heart. The intercalated disks prevent dystrophin spreading between the singly nucleated cardiomyocytes. It has been shown in skeletal muscle that dystrophin-positive revertant cells are more resistant to degeneration than dystrophin-null myofibers.23 If the same principle works in the heart, we hypothesize that dystrophin-positive cardiomyocytes seen in young carrier mice would eventually dominate the heart. This relative increase in dystrophin-positive cells would explain the lack of cardiomyopathy in old carrier mice. To test this hypothesis, we quantified the number of dystrophin-positive fibers in the heart. Neither revertant cardiomyocytes in mdx mice nor dystrophin-positive cardiomyocytes in carrier mice showed an age-associated increase in number (Figure 5). This result excludes selective survival/expansion of dystrophin-positive cells as the underlying mechanism.
Utrophin shares structural similarity with dystrophin and has been actively pursued as a therapeutic molecule for DMD/BMD (reviewed elsewhere31). We next examined whether utrophin upregulation played a role. Similar to previous reports in young mdx mice and DMD/BMD patients,32,33 we found uniform utrophin upregulation in the hearts of old mdx mice (supplemental Figure II). Furthermore, we observed a minimal, albeit detectable, level of the DGC at the sarcolemma in the mdx heart (supplemental Figure IIB). Why does the uniformly expressed utrophin not confer protection in the mdx heart? One apparent explanation could be that the upregulated utrophin did not provide sufficient mechanical support. Several studies have directly measured muscle force in mdx heart. Sapp et al have shown a contractile defect in the mdx atria.34 Janssen et al have measured ventricular muscle force.35 Using the developed force as an index, they show significantly lower developed force in mdx ventricle when compared with normal ventricle. Knocking out utrophin further depresses ventricular developed force in dystrophin/utrophin double knockout mice.35 Thus, utrophin upregulation offers only a weak mechanical support to the mdx heart, and it is insufficient to stop dilated cardiomyopathy (Figure 7).
|
Utrophin upregulation in the carrier mouse heart had a different pattern. It occurred only in dystrophin-negative cardiomyocytes (Figure 6). The remaining cardiomyocytes (
50%) expressed normal level dystrophin. Cells expressing dystrophin contained normal concentration of the DGC components, whereas cells expressing utrophin had a reduced yet intact DGC (Figure 6C). Based on these findings, we propose that the mosaic pattern of dystrophin-positive cells in carrier mice may act like steel bars in reinforced concrete and ultimately increase the overall strength of the entire heart (Figure 7). Taken together, our results have provided correlative evidence that in the background of moderate utrophin upregulation, 50% dystrophin-positive cardiomyocytes are sufficient to prevent dilated cardiomyopathy. Future studies in utrophin/dystrophin double knockout mice and/or cardiac-specific utrophin transgenic mice may further clarify the role utrophin plays in the heart.
Perhaps a more pressing issue is why human carriers are not protected. To answer this question, we first need to point out that severe dilated cardiomyopathy is actually a low incidence problem in DMD/BMD carriers. On average, only
10% carriers develop severe heart disease.36,37 The majority have no cardiac problems, even at 55 years of age.38 The reason for the selective involvement of certain patients is not understood. It may involve a number of genetic, environmental, nutritional, and other yet undefined triggering factors. Future studies in this area may help us to better understand cardiac disease in DMD/BMD patients and carriers.
Taken together, we have demonstrated a complete prevention of cardiomyopathy through 50% mosaic dystrophin expression in old carrier mice. Because 100% correction is not feasible in gene and/or cell therapy, our results have provided a strong theoretical basis for the clinical usefulness of these novel treatments. Considering the fact that utrophin upregulation is a common finding in the hearts of DMD/BMD patients, achieving a full cardiac recovery may be an attainable goal in gene and/or cell therapy of dystrophin-deficient cardiomyopathy, especially when treatment is performed in utero or in neonatal patients before heart disease develops.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by NIH grant AR-49419 (to D.D.) and by the Muscular Dystrophy Association (to D.D.). B.B. was partially supported by NIH training grant GM 008396.
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Original received March 29, 2007; resubmission received August 29, 2007; revised resubmission received September 19, 2007; accepted October 16, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |