Editorials |
From the Carolina Cardiovascular Biology Center (S.-W.J., C.P.), Departments of Cell and Molecular Physiology (S.-W.J.) and Medicine (C.P.), the Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology (S.-W.J.), School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Correspondence to Cam Patterson, MD, Director, Division of Cardiology and Carolina Cardiovascular Biology Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 8200 Medical Biomolecular Research Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7126; E-mail cpatters{at}med.unc.edu
See related article, pages 12–15
Key Words: arterial specification Sox protein zebrafish
Vertebrates have evolved 2 types of blood vessels—arteries and veins—that function to supply oxygen and nutrients and remove cellular waste. To efficiently accomplish these specialized functions, arteries and veins have developed distinct morphological and molecular differences. As a result, the endothelial cells that compose arteries and veins are vastly different in their biochemical and cellular properties. During development, the nascent endothelial cells generated from hemangioblasts or angioblasts1,2 undergo tightly regulated specification and differentiation processes to adopt either the arterial or venous endothelial fate. Differentiated endothelial cells migrate and aggregate to form either arteries or veins according to their adopted fate.3 Dysregulation of these regulated events often results in devastating consequences. For instance, failure to segregate arterial and venous endothelial cells causes potentially fatal clinical conditions such as arteriovenous malformation, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia, and cerebral cavernous malformation.4
Significant progress has been made in understanding how nascent endothelial cells adopt the arterial fate, resulting in identification of several key signaling molecules and their intracellular transducers involved in the specification of arterial endothelial cells.5 However, transcription factors that function downstream of these signaling cascades are largely unknown to date. Recently, hey2/Gridlock,6,7 a member of the hairy and enhancer of split-related family of bHLH transcription factors, and Foxc1 and Foxc2,8,9 which are forkhead transcription factors, have been implicated in arterial specification (Figure). A report in this issue of Circulation Research by Herpers et al elucidates the essential function of another transcription factor family, Sox, in this process.10
|
Sox transcription factors are DNA binding proteins that have a high degree of sequence homology to the testis-determining gene Sry.11–13 They contain a characteristic DNA-binding motif commonly known as the high mobility group domain.14 Sox family transcription factors can be further divided into 10 subgroups: SoxA to SoxJ.15 Sox protein transcription factors appear to have important roles in various developmental process, including fate specification and organogenesis.15 For instance, Sox2 is critical for maintenance of neural stem cell fate,16 and Sox13 is essential for specification of 
T cells.17 In zebrafish, the endodermless casanova phenotype is caused by a mutation in Sox32,18 indicating that Sox transcription factors are essential for establishing endoderm fate during development.
Sox transcription factors that belong to the SoxF subgroup, such as Sox7, Sox17, and Sox18, are highly expressed in the developing vasculature.10,19 Among these members, the functions of Sox17 and Sox18 are relatively well studied. Sox17- and Sox18-null mice have been previously generated.20,21 Despite their expression pattern, neither Sox17- nor Sox18-null mice exhibit any obvious vascular defects, although double nulls of Sox17 and Sox18 display a wide range of vascular defects including defective dorsal aorta formation.19 In contrast to what is known about Sox17 and Sox18, the function of Sox7 remains to be investigated. In their article, Herpers et al reveal a novel function for Sox transcription factors by demonstrating that Sox7 and Sox18 may serve as essential regulators in the specification of arterial fate.10 However, these 2 transcription factors do not appear to be essential regulators for vascular development individually: morpholinos targeting either one of these 2 genes does not display any discernable vascular defects. Intriguingly, when blocked simultaneously, attenuation of Sox7 and Sox18 function causes a loss of circulation in the posterior part of embryos, which eventually leads to the development of a circulatory loop in the anterior part of the affected embryos.10 To elucidate the etiology of this peculiar phenotype, the authors investigated the molecular properties and cellular architecture of endothelial cells in embryos coinjected with Sox7 and Sox18 morpholinos. In these embryos, the authors found that the specification of arterial endothelial cells is severely disrupted, which is often accompanied by failure of segregation of arteries from veins.10 Based on their observation, the authors concluded that Sox7 and Sox18, although dispensable for vascular development individually, synergistically function to promote the specification of arterial endothelial cells.
The biochemical nature of how Sox7 and Sox18 interact remains to be discovered. Nevertheless, the article by Herpers et al clearly demonstrates that these Sox proteins together regulate the specification of arterial fate.10 Sox7 has been implicated as a potential modulator of many developmentally essential signaling pathways, such as fibroblast growth factor,22 Wnt/β-catenin,23 and Nodal.24 It will therefore be extremely interesting to see how the interaction between Sox7 and Sox18 modifies Sox7-mediated activation of these critical signaling pathways to promote the specification of arterial endothelial cells. In addition, open questions remain about the direct transcriptional targets of these transcription factors within angioblasts and how the Sox7/Sox18-dependent gene expression program culminates in artery–vein segregation. The studies by Herpers et al opens up new opportunities to understand the molecular and cellular mechanisms of vascular development and of vascular diseases associated with arteriovenous shunt formation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Choi K, Kennedy M, Kazarov A, Papadimitriou JC, Keller G. A common precursor for hematopoietic and endothelial cells. Development. 1998; 125: 725–732.[Abstract]
3. Jin SW, Beis D, Mitchell T, Chen JN, Stainier DY. Cellular and molecular analyses of vascular tube and lumen formation in zebrafish. Development. 2005; 132: 5199–5209.
4. Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis in life, disease and medicine. Nature. 2005; 438: 932–936.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Lawson ND, Vogel AM, Weinstein BM. Sonic hedgehog and vascular endothelial growth factor act upstream of the Notch pathway during arterial endothelial differentiation. Dev Cell. 2002; 3: 127–136.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Kokubo H, Miyagawa-Tomita S, Nakazawa M, Saga Y, Johnson RL. Mouse hesr1 and hesr2 genes are redundantly required to mediate Notch signaling in the developing cardiovascular system. Dev Biol. 2005; 278: 301–309.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Zhong TP, Rosenberg M, Mohideen MA, Weinstein B, Fishman MC. gridlock, an HLH gene required for assembly of the aorta in zebrafish. Science. 2000; 287: 1820–1824.
8. Seo S, Fujita H, Nakano A, Kang M, Duarte A, Kume T. The forkhead transcription factors, Foxc1 and Foxc2, are required for arterial specification and lymphatic sprouting during vascular development. Dev Biol. 2006; 294: 458–470.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Kume T, Jiang H, Topczewska JM, Hogan BL. The murine winged helix transcription factors, Foxc1 and Foxc2, are both required for cardiovascular development and somitogenesis. Genes Dev. 2001; 15: 2470–2482.
10. Herpers R, van de Kamp E, Duckers HJ, Schulte-Merker S. Redundant roles for Sox7 and Sox18 in arteriovenous specification in zebrafish. Circ Res. 2008; 102; 12–15.
11. Jäger RJ, Anvret M, Hall K, Scherer G. A human XY female with a frame shift mutation in the candidate testis-determining gene SRY. Nature. 1990; 348: 452–454.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Koopman P, Münsterberg A, Capel B, Vivian N, Lovell-Badge R. Expression of a candidate sex-determining gene during mouse testis differentiation. Nature. 1990; 348: 450–452.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Berta P, Hawkins JR, Sinclair AH, Taylor A, Griffiths BL, Goodfellow PN, Fellous M. Genetic evidence equating SRY and the testis-determining factor. Nature. 1990; 348: 448–450.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Wilson M, Koopman P. Matching SOX: partner proteins and cofactors of the SOX family of transcriptional regulators. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002; 12: 441–446.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Bowles J, Schepers G, Koopman P. Phylogeny of the SOX family of developmental transcription factors based on sequence and structural indicators Dev. Biol. 200; 227: 239–255.[CrossRef]
16. Graham V, Khudyakov J, Ellis P, Pevny L. SOX2 functions to maintain neural progenitor identity. Neuron. 2003; 39: 749–765.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Melichar HJ, Narayan K, Der SD, Hiraoka Y, Gardiol N, Jeannet G, Held W, Chambers CA, Kang J. Regulation of gammadelta versus alphabeta T lymphocyte differentiation by the transcription factor SOX13. Science. 2007; 315: 230–233.
18. Kikuchi Y, Agathon A, Alexander J, Thisse C, Waldron S, Yelon D, Thisse B, Stainier DY. Casanova encodes a novel Sox-related protein necessary and sufficient for early endoderm formation in zebrafish. Genes Dev. 2001; 15: 1493–1505.
19. Sakamotoa Y, Haraa K, Kanai-Azumab M, Matsuia T, Miuraa Y, Tsunekawaa N, Kurohmarua M, Saijoh Y, Koopman P, Kanai Y. Redundant roles of Sox17 and Sox18 in early cardiovascular development of mouse embryos. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007; 360: 539–544.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Kim I, Saunders TL, Morrison SJ. Sox17 dependence distinguishes the transcriptional regulation of fetal from adult hematopoietic stem cells. Cell. 2007; 130: 470–483.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Pennisi D, Bowles J, Nagy A, Muscat G, Koopman P. Mice null for Sox18 are viable and display a mild coat defect. Mol Cell Biol. 2000; 20: 9331–9336.
22. Murakami A, Shen H, Ishida S, Dickson C. SOX7 and GATA-4 are competitive activators of Fgf-3 transcription. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279: 28564–28573.
23. Takash W, Cañizares J, Bonneaud N, Poulat F, Mattéi MG, Jay P, Berta P. SOX7 transcription factor: sequence, chromosomal localisation, expression, transactivation and interference with Wnt signaling. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001; 29: 4274–4283.
24. Zhang C, Basta T, Fawcett SR, Klymkowsky MW. SOX7 is an immediate-early target of VegT and regulates Nodal-related gene expression in Xenopus. Dev Biol. 2005; 278: 526–541.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
Related Article:
Circ. Res. 2008 102: 12-15.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. T. Yetman and T. Graham The dilated aorta in patients with congenital cardiac defects. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 10, 2009; 53(6): 461 - 467. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Aitsebaomo, A. L. Portbury, J. C. Schisler, and C. Patterson Brothers and Sisters: Molecular Insights Into Arterial-Venous Heterogeneity Circ. Res., October 24, 2008; 103(9): 929 - 939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |