| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Molecular Medicine |
From the Divisions of Cardiovascular Diseases (J.H., A.M.S., D.V., T.E.P., M.O., A.L.) and Nephrology and Hypertension (A.C., L.O.L.), Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and College of Medicine, Rochester, Minn.
Correspondence to Amir Lerman, MD, Division of Cardiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail lerman.amir{at}mayo.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: atherosclerosis endothelial dysfunction oxidative stress proteasome ubiquitin
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Eighty to 90% of all intracellular proteins are degraded via the 20S proteasome, a barrel-shaped complex formed by 2 outer (
) rings and 2 inner (ß) rings, each composed of 7 subunits.7 The ß1, ß2, and ß5 subunits harbor caspase-like, trypsin-like, and chymotrypsin-like activities, respectively, with the latter being of utmost importance for overall proteasome function. The 20S proteasome is self-sufficient for the degradation of oxidized proteins.8 It also operates in conjunction with the ubiquitin system, which catalyzes the binding of ubiquitin molecules to target proteins, allowing their recognition by the 26S proteasome, ie, by the 19S subunits to either side of the 20S proteolytic complex.9 Possibly related to the impairment of the function of the proteolytic core, accumulation of ubiquitin/ubiquitinated proteins can be seen in human atherosclerotic plaques and particularly in more active lesions, characterized by increased oxidative stress.10,11 Indeed, there is in vitro evidence that high levels of oxidative stress can impair proteasome function with cytotoxic consequences.12 In turn, impairment in proteasome function can increase intracellular oxidative stress.13 Whereas these studies support a detrimental effect of impaired proteasome function, other reports suggest that proteasome inhibition may be of benefit for atherosclerotic plaque progression and complication.14,15 Hence, there has remained uncertainty with regard to the pathophysiological role of the proteasome in ASCVD.
Potent and specific pharmacological inhibitors of the proteasome have been tested extensively over the past years, such as the boronate-type inhibitor MLN-273.9 As a result, PS-341 (bortezomib [Velcade]), a proteasome inhibitor (PSI) very closely related to MLN-273, was approved for the treatment of therapy-refractory multiple myeloma in 2003.16 Beyond therapeutic applications, the in vivo use of these specific inhibitors is an attractive means to gain pathophysiological insight. Thus, in the current study, chronic administration of MLN-273 was used to define the pathophysiological significance of the proteasome for ASCVD. Our hypothesis was that by virtue of the reported stimulating effect on oxidative stress, chronic proteasome inhibition would impair the function and structure of coronary arteries in normal animals and would aggravate the vascular changes of early atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic animals.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Determination of Plasma Lipid Profile and Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Levels
As described previously, plasma concentrations of triglycerides and total, HDL, and LDL cholesterol were determined with a commercial agent.18 Circulating levels of oxidized LDL were measured in plasma using a spectrophotometric enzyme immunoassay kit (Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden).19
Analysis of Proteasome Activity
Proteasome activity in peripheral mononuclear cells was performed as described previously.17 Coronary artery proteasome activity was quantified as outlined previously but with substantial modifications (see the expanded Materials and Methods section in the online data supplement at http://circres.ahajournals.org).11,18
In Vitro Analysis of Vascular Reactivity
Organ chamber experiments were performed according to an established protocol.20–22
TUNEL Staining
Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase end-labeling (TUNEL) staining was performed by use of the ApopTag In Situ Apoptosis Detection Kit (Intergen Co, Purchase, NY), as described previously (see the online data supplement).10
Histologic and Morphometric Analyses
Hematoxylin/eosin and Elastica–van Gieson staining was performed as previously reported.22,23 Using a digital image system, morphometric analyses on Elastica–van Gieson–stained slides were performed at a magnification of 10x (see the online data supplement).
Oil Red O Staining
Unfixed frozen coronary artery segments were cut into 10-µm-thick sections, placed on a glass slide, and stored at –80°C until the day of the experiment, which was performed as described previously.24,25
Immunostaining and Immunoblotting
Immunostaining and immunoblotting were performed as outlined previously (see the online data supplement).10,18,21,23,25
Fluorescent Microscopy
Dihydroethidium (DHE) (Sigma) was used to demonstrate in situ levels of superoxide production, as described previously.11,26,27 The percentage of intima area positive for immunofluorescence was quantified as outlined for immunostaining.
Lucigenin Chemiluminescence
Superoxide production was measured from aortic samples using lucigenin-enhanced chemiluminescence (5 µmol/L), as described previously, and validated previously.28,29
Statistical Analysis
Continuous data were expressed as means±SEM. Multiple group comparisons were made by 1-way ANOVA with Student–Newman–Keuls post hoc analysis. Two group comparisons were made by Students t test. Statistical significance was accepted at P<0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Proteasome Activity
A single dose of 0.08 mg/kg MLN-273 resulted in 68±4% and 40±9% inhibition of chymotrypsin-like proteasomal activity in circulating peripheral mononuclear cells 1 hour and 24 hours after subcutaneous injection, respectively. Chymotrypsin-like proteasome activity in coronary arteries was inhibited by 68±4% in N+PSI and 72±4% in HC+PSI on the day of euthanasia, which was 2±1 days after the last injection (Figure 1A). As expected, there was no decrease in trypsin-like proteasome activity in animals treated with MLN-273. A significant increase in the extent of ubiquitinated proteins in the coronary artery wall was observed in HC+PSI (Figure 1B).
|
Coronary artery expression of the ß5 subunit was higher in HC+PSI, whereas no difference in coronary artery expression of the ß2 subunit of the proteasome was observed among the groups (Figure I in the online data supplement). The percentage of TUNEL-positive endothelial cells, indicating apoptosis, was not significantly higher in N+PSI than in N (1.36±0.38 versus 0.39±0.22%) and elevated to a similar degree in HC and HC+PSI (1.93±0.41 and 1.60±0.19%, P<0.05 versus N; supplemental Figure I).
Oxidative Stress Parameters
Compared with N, plasma concentrations of oxidized LDL were elevated in HC and even more in HC+PSI as previously reported (Table 1).30
DHE fluorescence was higher in the area of the coronary intima in HC, HC+PSI, and N+PSI compared with N (8.9±1.6, 6.0±3.5, 7.2±3.9 versus 0.6±0.9% intimal area, P<0.05 for all, Figure 2A). Nitrotyrosine immunoreactivity was highest in HC+PSI and higher in HC than in N (4.1±1.4 and 2.7±0.5 versus 0.4±0.1, P<0.05) and tended to be higher in N+PSI than in N (1.0±0.4 versus 0.4±0.1, P=0.01; Figure 2A). Similarly, Western blotting showed an increased amount of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal–modified proteins and most prominently in HC+PSI (Figure 2B). Additional lucigenin chemiluminescence studies, performed on aortic samples, demonstrated the highest values in HC+PSI and milder elevations in HC and N+PSI (Figure 2C). The expression of the NAD(P)H oxidase subunit p47phox but not of the gp91phox and p67phox subunits was higher in the intervention groups than in N (Figure 3).
|
|
In Vitro Vasoreactivity and Endothelial NO Synthase Expression
Compared with N, coronary arteries from HC, N+PSI, and HC+PSI displayed an attenuated response to the endothelium-dependent vasodilator bradykinin but not to the endothelium-independent vasodilator sodium nitroprusside (Figure 4). The degree of impairment in endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation was higher in PSI-treated animals, also reflected in the impaired vasorelaxation response to calcium ionophore (Figure 4). There was no difference in vasoreactivity between N+PSI and HC+PSI. Compared with their untreated counterparts, coronary artery expression of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) was higher in PSI-treated animals (Figure 5).
|
|
Histology and Morphometry
Histological review showed no abnormality other than intimal thickening, which was of significant degree in HC+PSI (Table 2 and supplemental Figure II). Immunostaining for smooth muscle
-actin was positive in areas of intimal thickening in HC and minimally in PSI-treated animals (supplemental Figure II). Compared with N, oil red O staining was observed in areas of intimal thickening mainly in HC+PSI and HC+PSI but also in N+PSI animals (0.6±0.07 versus 6.8±2.7 and 5.6±2.9 and 1.7±0.5% intimal area, P<0.05 for all; Figure 6). Macrophage/foam cell accumulation by macrophage scavenger receptor A immunoreactivity was noted in HC, less prominently in N+PSI, and most prominently in HC+PSI rather than in N (0.015±0.012, 0.004±0.004, and 0.056±0.034 versus 0.001±0.001% intimal area, P<0.01 HC+PSI versus N; Figure 6). Macrophage accumulation correlated with a significantly higher expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and E-selectin in HC+PSI (supplemental Figure III). The increase in these 2 nuclear factor
B–regulated cell adhesion molecules was observed in the presence of an increased level of its endogenous inhibitor I
B
, whose expression and degradation is controlled by nuclear factor
B and the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS), respectively (supplemental Figure III).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Proteasome Inhibition and Oxidative Stress
In line with our current studies on coronary arteries in hypercholesterolemic pigs, other investigators recently reported on an increase in proteasome activity in the aorta of hypercholesterolemic rabbits.14 Of further note, previous in vitro studies showed that low-dose oxidative stress stimulates proteasome proteolytic activity, namely its chymotrypsin-like activity.12,31 The increase in vascular proteasome activity may therefore be a reflection of the increase in vascular oxidative stress in hypercholesterolemia and may, in fact, represent a compensatory response to the increased production of proteasome substrates, including oxidatively damaged proteins. Indeed, inhibition of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome under these circumstances resulted in a prominent accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins and oxidatively modified proteins, eg, by 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal. Furthermore, serum concentrations of oxidized LDL were highest in these animals, even higher than in the untreated hypercholesterolemic animals, underscoring aggravation of oxidative stress by proteasome inhibition. In normocholesterolemia, chronic in vivo proteasome inhibition did not lead to a higher circulating level of oxidized LDL but to slightly higher LDL levels and a trend toward higher triglyceride plasma concentrations. These changes in the lipid profile may relate to an alteration of apolipoprotein B metabolism.32 Even in normocholesterolemic animals, chronic proteasome inhibition increased oxidative stress in the intima in vivo, as reflected by DHE fluorescence for superoxide anion production and nitrotyrosine staining for peroxynitrite formation. Culture-based studies confirm these findings by demonstrating that higher yet nontoxic degrees of proteasome inhibition increase endogenous oxidative stress and render cells more susceptible to oxidative stress–related injury.13,33,34 Taken together, the current results extend in vitro findings on the interaction between oxidative stress and proteasome activity. Coronary proteasome activity is increased in hypercholesterolemia in association with enhanced oxidative stress, and oxidative stress is increased by chronic in vivo proteasome inhibition.
The current study suggests eNOS uncoupling as a potential mechanism for the increase in vascular oxidative stress in PSI-treated animals, given the constellation of increased eNOS expression, yet signs of reduced functional NO availability in vasoreactivity studies.35 Superoxide production has been shown to contribute to increased eNOS expression via formation of the dismutation product H2O2 and to reduce NO bioavailability via formation of the reaction product peroxynitrite.36 Peroxynitrite can oxidize tetrahydrobiopterin, an essential cofactor for eNOS, leading to the uncoupling of the enzyme from normal NO production.37,38 The initial increase in superoxide production might have been instigated by NAD(P)H oxidase, given the increased expression of p47phox, which plays an important role in the sequence of events leading to increased vascular oxidative stress.39 Whether proteasome inhibition stimulates the gene expression of this particular NAD(P)H oxidase subunit or contributes to its posttranscriptional stabilization remains to be determined.
In endothelial cell culture experiments, Meiners et al noted an increase in the expression of genes encoding for antioxidant enzymes and a decrease in the expression of the NAD(P)H oxidase family member NOX4 by incubation with PSIs for 24 hours.40 These findings were translated into a reduction of the formation of reactive oxygen species when endothelial cells were treated with PSIs before H2O2 challenge.40 Then again, other studies indicate a reciprocal interaction between proteasome and mitochondrial function as well.41,42 Based on the current study, chronic proteasome inhibition is associated with increased oxidative stress on the level of the coronary intima and especially the endothelial cell layer. In association with these findings, impairment in endothelial function and intimal thickening were observed in the epicardial coronary circulation, consistent with the oxidative stress and response-to-injury theory of atherosclerosis.
Proteasome Inhibition and Endothelial Function
Clearly, pigs treated with the PSI MLN-273 for 12 weeks developed impaired coronary vasorelaxation in response to bradykinin and calcium ionophore. The normal vasorelaxation response to sodium nitroprusside in these animals underscores selective impairment of endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation rather than a functional impairment on the level of the vascular smooth muscle cell layer. Importantly, the degree of in vivo proteasome inhibition on the level of the coronary artery was in a range defined previously as nontoxic.43 Also, there was no general accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins in animals chronically treated with MLN-273 unless combined with hypercholesterolemia. These findings highlight the fact that the current mode of proteasome inhibition was not to such an extensive (and then potentially toxic) degree that the generation of ubiquitinated products would surpass deubiquitination and degradation capacity under otherwise normal conditions. Furthermore, proteasome inhibition did not lead to an increase in TUNEL+ (apoptotic) cells in the coronary artery wall beyond the extent that can be seen in hypercholesterolemia. Nevertheless, chronic inhibition of the proteasome impaired coronary endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation to a degree that resembled the additive effect of systemic hypertension and hypercholesterolemia.22 Possibly because of the already maximally impaired endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation with chronic proteasome inhibition alone, no further aggravation could be observed with concomitant hypercholesterolemia. Finally, this impairment was observed even in the presence of increased eNOS expression. This latter finding is reminiscent of the increase in the expression and activity of eNOS in cultured bovine pulmonary arterial endothelial cells following 1- to 2-day incubation with the peptide aldehyde-type PSI MG-132 at doses that correlate with reversible, acutely >80% inhibition of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome.43 Interestingly, in the second part of that study, pretreatment of rat aortic rings with this drug–dose combination for 48 hours was found to increase their vasorelaxation response to acetylcholine.43 Hence, the current study extends previous in vitro reports by showing that nontoxic doses of proteasome inhibition can increase eNOS expression in vivo but nevertheless impair endothelial function profoundly when applied over a prolonged period of time.
Proteasome Inhibition and Intimal Thickening
As highlighted by the current results, chronic proteasome inhibition favors intimal thickening in animals on a N and significantly adds to its development in hypercholesterolemia. Furthermore, lipid deposition in areas of intimal thickening even in animals on a N supports increased permeability of the endothelial monolayer. Similarly, the degree of lipid accumulation was enhanced in hypercholesterolemic animals in the presence of comparable circulating lipid levels. In association with these findings, accumulation of the macrophages by staining for CD172a and CD204/scavenger receptor A could be detected. In the most severely affected areas, the distribution pattern of this surface maker became diffuse, likely reflecting the clustering of macrophages. Thus, chronic proteasome inhibition exaggerated the development of early atherosclerotic lesions, as defined by intimal thickening, lipid deposition, and macrophage accumulation.44
Areas of intimal thickening in animals receiving proteasome inhibition were characterized by a relative paucity of smooth muscle cells (SMCs) compared with those in untreated hypercholesterolemic animals. This may agree with the initial in vitro study by Thyberg and Blomgren highlighting an inhibitory effect of MG-132 on vascular SMC proliferation and transformation.45 Meiners et al extended these observations by showing a 75% reduction in neointima formation with a 1-time local application of MG-132 (1 mol/L) directly after balloon injury to carotid arteries.46 These findings suggested a proproliferative role for the ubiquitin–proteasome system and a potential benefit for the induction of vascular SMC apoptosis by proteasome inhibition at least in the vascular response to mechanical injury. On the contrary, Stone et al demonstrated a downregulation of genes encoding for components of the ubiquitin–proteasome system in areas of intimal hyperplasia at the anastomosis sites of polytetrafluoroethylene grafts after their implantation into canine carotid arteries.47 Thus, in line with these previous studies, the current results underscore that even though chronic proteasome inhibition may prevent vascular SMC transformation and proliferation, it nevertheless leads to intimal thickening. The effects of proteasome inhibition on primary atherosclerosis at a level that induces vascular SMC apoptosis remain to be explored.
Clinical Implications
The possible contribution of chronic impairment in proteasome proteolytic function to ASCVD agrees with the decreased proteasome proteolytic activity recently observed in carotid artery plaques of symptomatic patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.11 In vitro experiments substantiate the view of a decrease in proteasome function by high levels of oxidative stress and its products such as oxidized LDL.12 In this context, the induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress by reactive nitrogen species must be mentioned as well, which can overload the ubiquitin–proteasome system, and, vice versa, inhibition of the proteasome and the unfolded protein response can lead to endoplasmic reticulum stress.48 Hence, increasing oxidative stress in the vascular wall may eventually impair proteasome function, which in turn further increases oxidative stress, thereby initiating a self-propagating cycle that decreases cell and tissue viability, ultimately of profound clinical significance for ASCVD. Intriguingly, a similar cycle was suggested for protein precipitation diseases, in which an etiologic role has been ascribed to the accumulation of ubiquitinated and oxidatively modified proteins.49 Taken together, these considerations eventually point to atherosclerosis not only as a "degenerative" but also as a protein quality-control disease.
Study Limitations
The molecular mechanisms underlying the increase in endogenous oxidative stress must be explored in greater detail in future studies. This includes specific inhibitor and cofactor studies for the primary potential sources, including upregulation of NAD(P)H oxidase, eNOS uncoupling, and the mitochondria. Also, future studies must take into consideration that the ultimate vascular response to proteasome inhibition is dose and time related and determined by multiple factors. This is true even more so when studies extend beyond cell culture systems.
In contrast to our previous study, we performed more rapid tissue homogenization with a glass grinder and simultaneous, plate reader–based measurements of all probes and used epoxomicin, the most selective PSI currently available, to calculate the proteasome-attributable degradation of the fluorogenic substrate.18 It is very likely, for this reason, that the current results differ from our previous findings in the identification of an increase in chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome in coronary arteries of hypercholesterolemic animals. Indeed, as indicated by others, the outcome of proteasome activity studies is subject to and hence limited by the methodology.50
Conclusions
Chronic proteasome inhibition is associated with increased oxidative stress, impairment in coronary endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation and intimal thickening, resembling and aggravating the vascular effects of traditional cardiovascular risk factors such as hypercholesterolemia. These findings support the significance of the proteasome and related protein quality-control mechanisms for vascular biology and pathology.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by NIH grants R01 HL63911-04 and K24 HL69840-01 (to A.L.) and RO1 HL77131 and RO1 DK73608 (to L.O.L.), the Mayo Foundation, and the Mayo Stiftung. A.L. is an Established Investigator of the American Heart Association.
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Cai H, Harrison DG. Endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular diseases: the role of oxidant stress. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 840–844.
3. Sorescu D, Szocs K, Griendling KK. NAD(P)H oxidases and their relevance to atherosclerosis. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2001; 11: 124–131.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Herrmann J, Lerman A. The endothelium: dysfunction and beyond. J Nucl Cardiol. 2001; 8: 197–206.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. De Nigris F, Lerman LO, Condorelli M, Lerman A, Napoli C. Oxidation-sensitive transcription factors and molecular mechanisms in the arterial wall. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2001; 3: 1119–1130.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Napoli C, de Nigris F, Palinski W. Multiple role of reactive oxygen species in the arterial wall. J Cell Biochem. 2001; 82: 674–682.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Coux O, Tanaka K, Goldberg AL. Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996; 65: 801–847.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Shringarpure R, Grune T, Mehlhase J, Davies KJ. Ubiquitin conjugation is not required for the degradation of oxidized proteins by proteasome. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 311–318.
9. Herrmann J, Ciechanover A, Lerman LO, Lerman A. The ubiquitin-proteasome system in cardiovascular diseases-a hypothesis extended. Cardiovasc Res. 2004; 61: 11–21.
10. Herrmann J, Edwards WD, Holmes DR Jr, Shogren KL, Lerman LO, Ciechanover A, Lerman A. Increased ubiquitin immunoreactivity in unstable atherosclerotic plaques associated with acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 40: 1919–1927.
11. Versari D, Herrmann J, Gossl M, Mannheim D, Sattler K, Meyer FB, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Dysregulation of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in human carotid atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006; 26: 2132–2139.
12. Vieira O, Escargueil-Blanc I, Jurgens G, Borner C, Almeida L, Salvayre R, Negre-Salvayre A. Oxidized LDLs alter the activity of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway: potential role in oxidized LDL-induced apoptosis. FASEB J. 2000; 14: 532–542.
13. Lee MH, Hyun DH, Jenner P, Halliwell B. Effect of proteasome inhibition on cellular oxidative damage, antioxidant defenses and nitric oxide production. J Neurochem. 2001; 78: 32–41.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Tan C, Li Y, Tan X, Pan H, Huang W. Inhibition of the ubiquitin-proteasome system: a new avenue for atherosclerosis. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006; 44: 1218–1225.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Marfella R, DAmico M, Di Filippo C, Baldi A, Siniscalchi M, Sasso FC, Portoghese M, Carbonara O, Crescenzi B, Sangiuolo P, Nicoletti GF, Rossiello R, Ferraraccio F, Cacciapuoti F, Verza M, Coppola L, Rossi F, Paolisso G. Increased activity of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in patients with symptomatic carotid disease is associated with enhanced inflammation and may destabilize the atherosclerotic plaque: effects of rosiglitazone treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 2444–2455.
16. Richardson PG. A review of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in multiple myeloma. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2004; 5: 1321–1331.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Lightcap ES, McCormack TA, Pien CS, Chau V, Adams J, Elliott PJ. Proteasome inhibition measurements: clinical application. Clin Chem. 2000; 46: 673–683.
18. Hermann J, Gulati R, Napoli C, Woodrum JE, Lerman LO, Rodriguez-Porcel M, Sica V, Simari RD, Ciechanover A, Lerman A. Oxidative stress-related increase in ubiquitination in early coronary atherogenesis. FASEB J. 2003; 17: 1730–1732.
19. Chade AR, Mushin OP, Zhu X, Rodriguez-Porcel M, Grande JP, Textor SC, Lerman A, Lerman LO. Pathways of renal fibrosis and modulation of matrix turnover in experimental hypercholesterolemia. Hypertension. 2005; 46: 772–779.
20. Herrmann J, Lerman LO, Rodriguez-Porcel M, Holmes DR Jr, Richardson DM, Ritman EL, Lerman A. Coronary vasa vasorum neovascularization precedes epicardial endothelial dysfunction in experimental hypercholesterolemia. Cardiovasc Res. 2001; 51: 762–766.
21. Rodriguez-Porcel M, Lerman LO, Holmes DR Jr, Richardson D, Napoli C, Lerman A. Chronic antioxidant supplementation attenuates nuclear factor-kappa B activation and preserves endothelial function in hypercholesterolemic pigs. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 53: 1010–1018.
22. Rodriguez-Porcel M, Lerman LO, Herrmann J, Sawamura T, Napoli C, Lerman A. Hypercholesterolemia and hypertension have synergistic deleterious effects on coronary endothelial function. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 885–891.
23. Herrmann J, Samee S, Chade A, Rodriguez Porcel M, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Differential effect of experimental hypertension and hypercholesterolemia on adventitial remodeling. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 447–453.
24. de Nigris F, Lerman LO, Rodriguez-Porcel M, De Montis MP, Lerman A, Napoli C. c-myc activation in early coronary lesions in experimental hypercholesterolemia. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001; 281: 945–950.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Wilson SH, Caplice NM, Simari RD, Holmes DR Jr, Carlson PJ, Lerman A. Activated nuclear factor-kappaB is present in the coronary vasculature in experimental hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis. 2000; 148: 23–30.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Chade AR, Krier JD, Rodriguez-Porcel M, Breen JF, McKusick MA, Lerman A, Lerman LO. Comparison of acute and chronic antioxidant interventions in experimental renovascular disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2004; 286: F1079–F1086.
27. Zhu XY, Chade AR, Rodriguez-Porcel M, Bentley MD, Ritman EL, Lerman A, Lerman LO. Cortical microvascular remodeling in the stenotic kidney: role of increased oxidative stress. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 1854–1859.
28. Ohara Y, Peterson TE, Harrison DG. Hypercholesterolemia increases endothelial superoxide anion production. J Clin Invest. 1993; 91: 2546–2551.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Laursen JB, Somers M, Kurz S, McCann L, Warnholtz A, Freeman BA, Tarpey M, Fukai T, Harrison DG. Endothelial regulation of vasomotion in apoE-deficient mice: implications for interactions between peroxynitrite and tetrahydrobiopterin. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1282–1288.
30. Chade AR, Herrmann J, Zhu X, Krier JD, Lerman A, Lerman LO. Effects of proteasome inhibition on the kidney in experimental hypercholesterolemia. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16: 1005–1012.
31. Gomes-Marcondes MC, Tisdale MJ. Induction of protein catabolism and the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway by mild oxidative stress. Cancer Lett. 2002; 180: 69–74.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Liang JS, Distler O, Cooper DA, Jamil H, Deckelbaum RJ, Ginsberg HN, Sturley SL. HIV protease inhibitors protect apolipoprotein B from degradation by the proteasome: a potential mechanism for protease inhibitor-induced hyperlipidemia. Nat Med. 2001; 7: 1327–1331.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Lee CS, Tee LY, Warmke T, Vinjamoori A, Cai A, Fagan AM, Snider BJ. A proteasomal stress response: pre-treatment with proteasome inhibitors increases proteasome activity and reduces neuronal vulnerability to oxidative injury. J Neurochem. 2004; 91: 996–1006.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Lev N, Melamed E, Offen D. Proteasomal inhibition hypersensitizes differentiated neuroblastoma cells to oxidative damage. Neurosci Lett. 2006; 399: 27–32.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Forstermann U, Munzel T. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase in vascular disease: from marvel to menace. Circulation. 2006; 113: 1708–1714.
36. Drummond GR, Cai H, Davis ME, Ramasamy S, Harrison DG. Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression by hydrogen peroxide. Circ Res. 2000; 86: 347–354.
37. Milstien S, Katusic Z. Oxidation of tetrahydrobiopterin by peroxynitrite: implications for vascular endothelial function. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999; 263: 681–684.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Kuzkaya N, Weissmann N, Harrison DG, Dikalov S. Interactions of peroxynitrite, tetrahydrobiopterin, ascorbic acid, and thiols: implications for uncoupling endothelial nitric-oxide synthase. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 22546–22554.
39. Landmesser U, Dikalov S, Price SR, McCann L, Fukai T, Holland SM, Mitch WE, Harrison DG. Oxidation of tetrahydrobiopterin leads to uncoupling of endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase in hypertension. J Clin Invest. 2003; 111: 1201–1209.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Meiners S, Ludwig A, Lorenz M, Dreger H, Baumann G, Stangl V, Stangl K. Nontoxic proteasome inhibition activates a protective antioxidant defense response in endothelial cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006; 40: 2232–2241.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Dhanasekaran A, Kotamraju S, Karunakaran C, Kalivendi SV, Thomas S, Joseph J, Kalyanaraman B. Mitochondria superoxide dismutase mimetic inhibits peroxide-induced oxidative damage and apoptosis: role of mitochondrial superoxide. Free Radic Biol Med. 2005; 39: 567–583.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Ding Q, Dimayuga E, Keller JN. Proteasome regulation of oxidative stress in aging and age-related diseases of the CNS. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2006; 8: 163–172.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Stangl V, Lorenz M, Meiners S, Ludwig A, Bartsch C, Moobed M, Vietzke A, Kinkel HT, Baumann G, Stangl K. Long-term up-regulation of eNOS and improvement of endothelial function by inhibition of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. FASEB J. 2004; 18: 272–279.
44. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Glagov S, Guyton JR, Insull W Jr, Rosenfeld ME, Schaffer SA, Schwartz CJ, Wagner WD, Wissler RW. A definition of initial, fatty streak, and intermediate lesions of atherosclerosis. A report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1994; 89: 2462–2478.
45. Thyberg J, Blomgren K. Effects of proteasome and calpain inhibitors on the structural reorganization and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells in primary culture. Lab Invest. 1999; 79: 1077–1088.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Meiners S, Laule M, Rother W, Guenther C, Prauka I, Muschick P, Baumann G, Kloetzel PM, Stangl K. Ubiquitin-proteasome pathway as a new target for the prevention of restenosis. Circulation. 2002; 105: 483–489.
47. Stone DH, Sivamurthy N, Contreras MA, Fitzgerald L, LoGerfo FW, Quist WC. Altered ubiquitin/proteasome expression in anastomotic intimal hyperplasia. J Vasc Surg. 2001; 34: 1016–1022.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Dickhout JG, Hossain GS, Pozza LM, Zhou J, Lhotak S, Austin RC. Peroxynitrite causes endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis in human vascular endothelium: implications in atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005; 25: 2623–2629.
49. Dudek EJ, Shang F, Valverde P, Liu Q, Hobbs M, Taylor A. Selectivity of the ubiquitin pathway for oxidatively modified proteins: relevance to protein precipitation diseases. FASEB J. 2005; 19: 1707–1709.
50. Powell SR, Davies KJ, Divald A. Optimal determination of heart tissue 26S-proteasome activity requires maximal stimulating ATP concentrations. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2007; 42: 265–269.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
Related Article:
Circ. Res. 2007 101: 859-861.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Herrmann, S. M. Soares, L. O. Lerman, and A. Lerman Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 14, 2008; 52(16): 1351 - 1351. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Herrmann, S. M. Soares, L. O. Lerman, and A. Lerman Potential Role of the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System in Atherosclerosis: Aspects of a Protein Quality Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 27, 2008; 51(21): 2003 - 2010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ludwig and S. Meiners Targeting of the Proteasome Worsens Atherosclerosis? Circ. Res., February 15, 2008; 102(3): e37 - e37. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fukai Targeting Proteasome Worsens Atherosclerosis Circ. Res., October 26, 2007; 101(9): 859 - 861. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |