Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2007;101:348-356
Published online before print May 10, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.106.147256
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/4/348    most recent
CIRCRESAHA.106.147256v2
CIRCRESAHA.106.147256v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koga, M.
Right arrow Articles by Imaizumi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koga, M.
Right arrow Articles by Imaizumi, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Other arteriosclerosis
Right arrow Growth factors/cytokines
Right arrow Gene therapy
Right arrowRelated Article
(Circulation Research. 2007;101:348.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Molecular Medicine

Inhibition of Progression and Stabilization of Plaques by Postnatal Interferon-{gamma} Function Blocking in ApoE-Knockout Mice

Mitsuhisa Koga, Hisashi Kai, Hideo Yasukawa, Tomoka Yamamoto, Yumiko Kawai, Seiya Kato, Ken Kusaba, Mamiko Kai, Kensuke Egashira, Yasufumi Kataoka, Tsutomu Imaizumi

From the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (M. Koga, H.K., T.Y., Y. Kawai, K.K., T.I.), Kurume University; the Department of Pharmaceutical Care and Health Sciences, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences (M. Koga, T.Y., Y.K., M. Kai, Y. Kataoka), Fukuoka University; the Cardiovascular Research Institute (H.Y.) and the Department of Pathology (S.K.), Kurume University; and the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (K.E.), Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan.

Correspondence to Hisashi Kai, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kurume University, 67 Asahi-machi, Kurume 830-0011, Japan. E-mail naikai{at}med.kurume-u.ac.jp


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
A role of interferon-{gamma} is suggested in early development of atherosclerosis. However, the role of interferon-{gamma} in progression and destabilization of advanced atherosclerotic plaques remains unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine whether postnatal inhibition of interferon-{gamma} signaling could inhibit progression of atherosclerotic plaques and stabilize the lipid- and macrophage-rich advanced plaques. Atherosclerotic plaques were induced in ApoE-knockout (KO) mice by feeding high-fat diet from 8 weeks old (w). Interferon-{gamma} function was postnatally inhibited by repeated gene transfers of a soluble mutant of interferon-{gamma} receptors (sIFN{gamma}R), an interferon-{gamma} inhibitory protein, into the thigh muscle every 2 weeks. When sIFN{gamma}R treatment was started at 12 w (atherosclerotic stage), sIFN{gamma}R not only prevented plaque progression but also stabilized advanced plaques at 16 w: sIFN{gamma}R decreased accumulations of the lipid and macrophages and increased fibrotic area with more smooth muscle cells. Moreover, sIFN{gamma}R downregulated expressions of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, adhesion molecules, and matrix metalloproteinases but upregulated procollagen type I. sIFN{gamma}R did not affect serum cholesterol levels. In conclusion, postnatal blocking of interferon-{gamma} function by sIFN{gamma}R treatment would be a new strategy to inhibit plaque progression and to stabilize advanced plaques through the antiinflammatory effects.


Key Words: atherosclerosis • inflammation • cytokine • gene therapy


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
There is increasing evidence that atherosclerosis is a kind of chronic inflammation1 characterized by continued recruitment and activation of monocytes and T-lymphocytes.2,3 Interferon-{gamma} is highlighted as a key mediator of atherosclerosis. Interferon-{gamma} is expressed at high levels in T-lymphocytes in atherosclerotic lesions.4,5 A variety of proatherogenic properties of interferon-{gamma} have been shown in cultured cells, such as endothelial cells (ECs), vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs), monocyte/macrophages, and T-lymphocytes. These include: differentiation of transmigrated monocytes to macrophages; activation of macrophages and T-lymphocytes; induction of proinflammatory cytokines (ie, interleukin [IL]-1β and IL-6); recruitment of monocyte/macrophages and T-lymphocytes through upregulation of chemokines (ie, monocyte chemoattractant protein [MCP]-1 and macrophage inflammatory protein [MIP]-1{alpha}) and adhesion molecules (vascular cell adhesion molecule [VCAM]-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1); and foam cell formation through upregulation of scavenger receptors.6–11 However, interferon-{gamma} also has atheroprotective actions, such as induction of antiinflammatory cytokines, in a range of cell types.12 Thus, the complexity of the in vitro effects makes it difficult to elucidate the in vivo effects of interferon-{gamma} on the development and progression of atherosclerosis.

Whitman et al13 demonstrated that chronic administration of recombinant interferon-{gamma} enhanced atherosclerosis in ApoE-KO mice. In atherosclerotic mice, such as ApoE-KO mice and LDL receptor–KO mice, genetic ablation of interferon-{gamma} or the interferon-{gamma} receptors reduced atherosclerosis.4,14,15 These studies have suggested that interferon-{gamma} promotes early development of atherosclerosis. However, when the therapeutic potential was considered, prophylactic inhibition of interferon-{gamma} would not be feasible before the development of atherosclerosis. Accordingly, it must be investigated about the roles of interferon-{gamma} on progression and destabilization of established advanced plaques. But, so far, no prior studies have addressed the effects of postnatal inhibition of interferon-{gamma} signaling on the advanced plaques.

Thus, the aim of this study was to determine whether postnatal inhibition of interferon-{gamma} signaling could inhibit progression of atherosclerotic plaques and stabilize the lipid- and macrophage-rich advanced plaques. It has been shown that overexpression of a soluble mutant of interferon-{gamma} receptor (sIFN{gamma}R), an interferon-{gamma} inhibitory protein, is a safe and effective tool to investigate the roles of interferon-{gamma} in the pathogenesis of experimental models of inflammatory diseases.16,17 Therefore, in the present study, naked plasmid DNA encoding sIFN{gamma}R was injected repeatedly into the thigh muscle to produce sIFN{gamma}R, as a means to inhibit interferon-{gamma} signaling in the advanced atherosclerotic stage of high-fat diet–fed ApoE-KO mice.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Treatment Committee of Kurume University. C57BL/6J ApoE-KO mice and C57BL/6J mice (wild-type) were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Me) and housed under standard conditions of humidity, room temperature, and dark-light cycles in plenty of chow and water.

sIFN{gamma}R Plasmid
The plasmid DNA encoding sIFN{gamma}R, the extracellular portion of the mouse interferon-{gamma} receptor {alpha}-chain conjugated with mouse IgG1 Fc-segment, was a gift of Dr Prud’homme (McGill University, Montreal, Canada). The construction of the sIFN{gamma}R plasmid and the anti–interferon-{gamma} effects ex vivo were described elsewhere.16,17 The plasmid was amplified, purified with an endotoxin-free purification kit (Quiagen) and stored at –20°C until use.

sIFN{gamma}R Gene Transfer
sIFN{gamma}R gene transfer was performed by using the naked DNA method, as described previously.18,19 Briefly, under ether anesthesia, 12.5 µg/g body weight of 0.5% bupivacaine (AstraZeneca) was injected into the thigh muscle to improve the efficiency of gene transfer.20 Three days after bupivacaine pretreatment, denoted doses of sIFN{gamma}R plasmid or the blank plasmid (mock) solved in 40 µL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were injected at the same site of the muscle as bupivacaine had been injected.

To evaluate the efficacy of gene transfer, serum sIFN{gamma}R protein levels were examined after a single sIFN{gamma}R gene transfer in wild-type mice. sIFN{gamma}R plasmid (200 µg) was injected into the thigh muscle 3 days after bupivacaine treatment. At denoted days, blood was drawn from the right atrium and kept frozen at –80°C (n=10/group). Aliquots of the serum (300 µL) were subjected to immunoprecipitation followed by immunoblotting using an antibody against the extracellular portion of the mouse interferon-{gamma} receptor {alpha}-chain (Santa Cruz Biotech).21 The signals were analyzed with the chemiluminescence detection system (Pierce Biotechnology).18

Inhibitory Effects of sIFN{gamma}R Gene Transfer on Interferon-{gamma}–Induced Macrophage Mobilization
In vivo anti–interferon-{gamma} effect of sIFN{gamma}R gene transfer was determined, as follows. In wild-type mice, 10, 100, or 200 µg of sIFN{gamma}R plasmid or the mock (200 µg) was injected into the bupivacaine-pretreated thigh muscle (n=10/group). Three days after sIFN{gamma}R gene transfer, recombinant mouse Interferon-{gamma} (8000 IU) dissolved in 50 µL of 25% pluronic F127 gel (Sigma Chemical Co) was injected intradermally onto the back. Twenty-four hours later, the injected dermis (5 mmx5 mm) was excised en-bloc, processed for the paraffinized sections, and subjected to immunohistostaining using monocyte/macrophage-specific monoclonal antibody (MOMA-2; Serotec) and a commercially available detection system (Vecstastain Elite ABC kit; Vector Laboratories).22,23 The number of infiltrated MOMA-2–stained macrophages was counted in the whole sections of the skin (5 sections per animal). The averages of macrophage counts were expressed as the cell count/mm2.

Experiment 1
From 8 weeks old (w), ApoE-KO mice were fed high-fat diet containing 20% fat and 0.15% cholesterol (Oriental Yeast). Mice were randomized to sIFN{gamma}R-treated mice and mock-treated mice (n=40/group). sIFN{gamma}R or mock plasmid (200 µg) was injected into the bupivacaine-treated thigh muscle twice at 12 and 14 w. The right and left legs were used for the gene transfers, alternately. After 4-week treatment (16 w), mice were euthanized with an overdose of pentobarbital after collection of blood from the right atrium. Immediately after the mice were perfused with ice-cold PBS, the heart and aorta were excised and subjected to morphometric and histological analyses. Serum total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol were measured by a commercially available laboratory (SRL, Fukuoka).

En Face Plaque Area
Immediately after mice were killed, the aorta (n=10/group) was excised and fixed in 10% buffered formalin for quantification of en face plaque area.24 Briefly, after the adventitial tissue was carefully removed, the aorta was opened longitudinally, stained with oil red O (Sigma), and pinned on a black wax surface. En face images were obtained by a stereomicroscope (SZX12, Olympus, Tokyo) equipped with a digital camera (Dxm1200, Nicon, Tokyo) and analyzed using Adobe Photoshop version 7.0 and Scion Image software. The percentage of the luminal surface area stained by oil red O was determined.24

Histology and Immunohistostaining
After the mouse was euthanized and perfused with ice-cold PBS, the heart and the ascending aorta (n=10/group) were snap-frozen in OCT compound (Sakura FineTech) for histological and immunohistological analyses. Serial cryostat sections (6 µm in the thickness) of the aortic root were prepared as described previously.25 Briefly, atherosclerotic plaques were investigated at 5 independent section sets, each separated by 120 µm. Mallory-Azan staining and oil red O staining were performed to determine fibrotic tissue and lipid-rich core, respectively. The remaining sections were subjected to immunohistostaining using antibodies against monocyte/macrophage (MOMA-2), {alpha}-smooth muscle actin ({alpha}-SMA; DAKO Cytomation), phosphorylated form of signal transducer and activator of transcription-1 (STAT1; Assay BioTechnology), CD40 (BD Pharmingen), and CD40 ligand (CD40L; Santa Cruz). For quantitative estimation of the plaque contents, we analyzed oil red O–, MOMA-2–, Azan-, and {alpha}-SMA–stained areas by using Adobe Photoshop version 7.0 and Scion Image software. In each animal, the average for 5 independent sections was used for analysis. The histological plaque stability score was calculated as follows: the plaque stability score=({alpha}-SMA–positive SMC area+Azan-stained collagen area)/(MOMA-2–stained macrophage area+oil red O–stained lipid area).25

Immunoblotting Analysis
The aorta was immediately snap-frozen in dry-ice/acetone (n=10/group). After tissue homogenization, protein extract was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and subjected to immunoblotting using antibodies against total STAT1 and phosphorylated STAT1 (Assay BioTechnology).22,26 The signals were detected and analyzed using the chemiluminescence detection system.18 Signal intensity of phosphorylated STAT1 was normalized by total STAT1 level in each sample.27

Real-Time RT-PCR Analysis
The aorta was rapidly snap-frozen in dry-ice/acetone and stored at –80°C until use (n=10/group). Total RNA was extracted and subjected to real-time RT-PCR analysis for quantitative evaluation of the mRNA expression changes in IL-1β, IL-6, VCAM-1, MCP-1, MIP-1{alpha}, procollagen type 1, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, and MMP-13.28 Expression level of the target gene was normalized by GAPDH level in each sample. See the online supplement (available at http://circres.ahajournals.org) for details on procedures.

Experiment 2
ApoE-KO mice were fed high-fat diet from 8 w and randomized to the following 3 groups (n=10/group) at 12 w. The 8-week sIFN{gamma}R treatment group received sIFN{gamma}R gene transfer 4 times at 12, 14, 16, and 18 w; the 8-week mock treatment group received mock gene transfer under the same schedule; and the treatment cessation group received sIFN{gamma}R gene transfer twice (at 12 and 14 w) and then mock gene transfer twice (at 16 and 18 w). At 20 w, mice were euthanized for the evaluation of the en face plaque area.

Statistical Analysis
Each quantitative analysis was performed by a single observer blinded to the experimental protocol. Data are expressed as mean±SD. Mann–Whitney U test was performed for the comparisons between 2 groups. Kruskal-Wallis test and Scheffé post-hoc analysis were used for the comparisons among 3 groups. A value P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Efficacy of a Single sIFN{gamma}R Gene Transfer in Wild-Type Mice
In wild-type mice, temporal changes in serum sIFN{gamma}R protein levels were evaluated after a single gene transfer of sIFN{gamma}R plasmid (200 µg). Immunoblotting analysis showed that sIFN{gamma}R protein was secreted into the serum, peaking at 3 to 7 days after gene transfer and being elevated for at least 2 weeks (Figure 1A).


Figure 1
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Efficacy of sIFN{gamma}R gene transfer into the thigh muscle. A, Representative immunoblot showing the temporal changes in serum sIFN{gamma}R protein levels after a single sIFN{gamma}R gene transfer (200 µg) into the thigh muscle of wild-type mice. B, sIFN{gamma}R gene transfer into the thigh muscle dose-dependently inhibited macrophage infiltration induced by recombinant interferon-{gamma} injection (8000 IU) in the subdermis of the back. Bar=1xSD (n=10). *P<0.05 vs mock treatment.

Next, in vivo anti–interferon-{gamma} effect of sIFN{gamma}R gene transfer was determined in wild-type mice. In mock-treated mice, 24 hours after recombinant interferon-{gamma} was injected intradermally onto the back, marked infiltration of MOMA-2–stained macrophages was noted at the interferon-{gamma} injection site (Figure 1B). The macrophage infiltration was dose-dependently inhibited by sIFN{gamma}R treatment, and the effect of 200 µg of sIFN{gamma}R plasmid was maximal. Therefore, the dose was used throughout the following experiments.

Experiment 1
Effects of Repeated sIFN{gamma}R Gene Transfers on General Conditions in ApoE-KO Mice
During 4-week sIFN{gamma}R treatment, all mice of sIFN{gamma}R- and mock-treated groups were apparently healthy, and no mice were lost before the day of sacrifice. sIFN{gamma}R treatment had no effects on body weight and blood pressure (Table). The 4-week sIFN{gamma}R treatment did not affect serum total and HDL cholesterol levels. Peripheral blood counts of leukocytes and monocytes did not differ between sIFN{gamma}R- and mock-treated mice (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Background Profiles

Effects on Plaque Area and Histological Aspects
Effects of postnatal inhibition of interferon-{gamma} function on existing plaques were investigated at the atherosclerotic stage of ApoE-KO mice by starting sIFN{gamma}R gene transfer at 12 w. Mock-treated ApoE-KO mice showed marked progression of atheromatous plaques at 16 w (Figure 2). sIFN{gamma}R treatment for 4 weeks attenuated progression of the aortic plaques.


Figure 2
View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Effects of 4-week sIFN{gamma}R treatment on atherosclerotic lesions. A, Representative en face photographs showing the oil red O–stained atherosclerotic plaques (yellow-red) of the aorta at 16 w. B, Pooled data of the effects of sIFN{gamma}R treatment on the en face plaque area. Bar=1xSD (n=10). *P<0.01 vs ApoE-KO mice before gene transfer at 12 w (Before treatment). {delta}P<0.01 vs mock-treated ApoE-KO mice.

Postnatal interferon-{gamma} function blocking not only reversed the plaque progression but also stabilized the advanced plaques. In mock-treated mice, the plaques consisted of massive oil red O–stained lipid core and bulky MOMA-2–stained macrophage accumulation, but had very thin Azan-stained fibrous cap with little {alpha}-SMA–stained SMCs (Figure 3A). These findings suggested low plaque stability from the histological aspect. sIFN{gamma}R treatment decreased the lipid and macrophage areas but increased fibrotic area and, to lesser extent, SMC area (Figure 3A and 3B). Accordingly, the histological plaque stability score was improved by sIFN{gamma}R treatment (Figure 3C).


Figure 3
View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Effects of sIFN{gamma}R treatment on histological aspects. A, Representative microphotographs of the oil red O (lipid)–, MOMA-2 (monocyte/macrophage)–, Azan (fibrous tissue)-, and {alpha}-smooth muscle actin (SMA; SMC)–stained cross-sections of plaques in the aortic root at 16 w. Arrowheads indicate intimal SMCs (brown). B, Pooled data of the effects of sIFN{gamma}R treatment on the oil red O–, MOMA-2–, Azan-, and {alpha}-SMA–stained areas. C, Pooled data of the effects on the histological plaque stability score. Bar=1xSD (n=10). *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 vs mock treatment, respectively.

Effects on STAT1 Activation and CD40/CD40L Expression
We investigated the effects of sIFN{gamma}R treatment on phosphorylation levels of STAT1, the major signaling molecule activated by interferon-{gamma}. In wild-type mice, STAT1 expression was scarcely found in the aorta (Figure 4A). In mock-treated ApoE-KO mice, STAT1 was not only upregulated but also phosphorylated. Immunohistostaining revealed that phosphorylated STAT1 was observed mainly in the atherosclerotic plaques (Figure 4B). sIFN{gamma}R treatment remarkably reduced the STAT1 phosphorylation in the plaques.


Figure 4
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Effects of sIFN{gamma}R treatment on activations of STAT1 and CD40/CD40L signals. A, Representative immunoblots against phosphorylated STAT1 (pSTAT1), total STAT1, and GAPDH (top) and the pooled data showing the effects of sIFN{gamma}R treatment on STAT1 phosphorylation (bottom). Bar=1xSD (n=10). *P<0.01 vs wild-type mice. {delta}P<0.01 vs mock-treated ApoE-KO mice. B, Representative microphotographs of immunohistostainings against pSTAT1, CD40, and CD40L using the sections of the aortic root at 16 w.

Also, we examined the effects on CD40/CD40L signaling previously reported as a mediator of lesion progression. In mock-treated ApoE-KO mice, immunoreactive CD40 and CD40L were evident in the atherosclerotic plaques (Figure 4B). sIFN{gamma}R treatment remarkably attenuated the CD40 and CD40L inductions.

Effects on the Gene Expression Changes
To explore the mechanisms whereby sIFN{gamma}R treatment inhibits plaque progression and stabilizes the plaques, gene expression changes of the proinflammatory molecules and the molecules related to the extracellular matrix (ECM) metabolism were investigated in the aorta (Figure 5). In mock-treated ApoE-KO mice, IL-1β, IL-6, VCAM-1, MCP-1, and MIP-1{alpha} were markedly upregulated at 16 w. Postnatal inhibition of interferon-{gamma} function substantially reduced the inductions of proinflammatory cytokines, adhesion molecule, and chemokines.


Figure 5
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Real-time RT-PCR analyses showing the effects of sIFN{gamma}R treatment on mRNA expressions at 16 w. Bar=1xSD (n=10). *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 vs wild-type mice. {delta}P<0.05 and {delta}{delta}P<0.01 vs mock-treated ApoE-KO mice.

MMP-9 (gelatinase) and MMP-13 (interstitial collagenase), the enzymes that degrade the ECM of plaques, were upregulated in mock-treated ApoE-KO mice. sIFN{gamma}R treatment repressed the MMP expressions but upregulated procollagen type I, the major ECM component of plaques.

Experiment 2
Effects of the 8-week sIFN{gamma}R treatment were investigated for the long-term effectiveness under prolonged hypercholesterolemia. In the treatment cessation group, mice received 4-week sIFN{gamma}R treatment followed by 4-week mock treatment. There were no significant differences in body weight, blood pressure, and serum lipid levels among the sIFN{gamma}R treatment group, the mock treatment group, and the treatment cessation group (data not shown). All mice in the 3 groups were apparently healthy during the observation period.

At 20 w, mock-treated mice showed further plaque progression (Figure 6). The 8-week sIFN{gamma}R treatment ameliorated the progression of the plaques, especially in the descending and abdominal aorta (Figure 6A). The en face plaque area was significantly smaller in sIFN{gamma}R-treated mice than in mock-treated mice (Figure 6B). In the treatment cessation group, lesion development was evident after sIFN{gamma}R treatment was stopped at 16 w, and the en face plaque area in the treatment cessation group was greater than in the 8-week sIFN{gamma}R treatment group but smaller than the mock treatment group at 20 w.


Figure 6
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Effects of 8-week sIFN{gamma}R treatment on atherosclerotic lesions. A, Representative en face photographs showing the oil red O–stained atherosclerotic plaques of the aorta at 20 w. B, Pooled data of the effects on the en face plaque area at 20 w. Bar=1xSD (n=10). *P<0.01 vs mock-treated ApoE-KO mice. {delta}P<0.01 vs sIFN{gamma}R-treated ApoE-KO mice.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Using sIFN{gamma}R gene transfer, the present study has demonstrated for the first time that postnatal blocking of interferon-{gamma} function not only inhibits progression of atherosclerotic plaques but also stabilizes the lipid- and macrophage-rich advanced plaques in ApoE-KO mice. Moreover, sIFN{gamma}R treatment inhibited inductions of proinflammatory molecules and MMPs but increased procollagen type I expression.

ApoE-KO mouse is an appropriate model for investigating the role of interferon-{gamma} in atherosclerotic lesions, because interferon-{gamma}–producing T-lymphocytes were documented within the atherosclerotic lesions in this model.4 It has been shown that sIFN{gamma}R is an interferon-{gamma} inhibiting protein, which competitively inhibits the binding of interferon-{gamma} to the receptors on the target cells by binding interferon-{gamma} in the extracellular space and/or in the circulation.16,17 To examine in vivo whether gene transfer of sIFN{gamma}R would increase sIFN{gamma}R production and inhibit inflammation, we injected the plasmid encoding sIFN{gamma}R into the thigh muscle by using the naked DNA method.29,30 As shown in Figure 1, sIFN{gamma}R gene transfer into the thigh muscle elevated serum sIFN{gamma}R protein levels and inhibited macrophage infiltration at the site of recombinant interferon-{gamma} injection (dermis of the back). Accordingly, it was suggested that the overexpressed sIFN{gamma}R proteins were secreted into the systemic circulation and in turn inhibited the interferon-{gamma}–induced inflammation in remote organs. Thus, in the present study, interferon-{gamma} function was probably blocked in high-fat diet–fed ApoE-KO mice by overexpressing sIFN{gamma}R in the thigh muscle. We and others have shown that repeated gene transfers using the naked DNA method is a safe and reproducible approach to maintain the long-term transgene expression without adverse effects.18,29,30 Serum sIFN{gamma}R levels remained elevated for at least 2 weeks after a single gene transfer (Figure 1A). Accordingly, sIFN{gamma}R gene transfers were repeated twice at 2-week interval in the present study.

Effects on the Plaque Progression and Stability
The present study has provided novel evidence that postnatal inhibition of intrinsic interferon-{gamma} inhibits plaque progression of ApoE-KO mice in the atherosclerotic stage (Figure 3). This is in line with previous studies showing that genetic ablation of interferon-{gamma} or the interferon-{gamma} receptors prevented the early development of atherosclerotic plaques in ApoE-KO mice and LDL receptor-KO mice.4,14,15 The present study suggested that sIFN{gamma}R treatment not merely delayed but inhibited plaque progression in the atherosclerotic stage as long as sIFN{gamma}R therapy was continued (Figure 6). Moreover, the fact that the lesion development caught up to the mock-treated group after the cessation of sIFN{gamma}R treatment may indicate that interferon-{gamma} is a key molecule for progression of advanced plaques under prolonged hypercholesterolemia. Our observations not only support the notion that interferon-{gamma} plays a substantial role in atherosclerotic plaque formation but also raise the possibility that blocking of interferon-{gamma}–mediated pathway would be a new target for prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis.

Another novel finding was that postnatal inhibition of interferon-{gamma} reduced lipid and macrophage accumulations and thickened fibrous cap by increasing fibrous tissue and SMCs, leading to stabilization of the lipid- and macrophage-rich advanced plaques with thin fibrous cap (Figure 3). These findings suggest that targeting interferon-{gamma} signaling is a potential strategy for regression and destabilization of advanced atherosclerotic lesions, particularly vulnerable plaques prone to rupture.

The present study is different from our previous one which showed that sIFN{gamma}R treatment prevented the formation of atherosclerotic plaque in ApoE-KO mice when sIFN{gamma}R gene therapy was started from the preatherosclerotic stage.31 Whereas in this study, sIFN{gamma}R treatment was performed in ApoE-KO mice with established, advanced plaques. sIFN{gamma}R treatment not only inhibited the progression of the plaques but also stabilized them. Thus, the present study suggests that interferon-{gamma} pathway inhibition would have the therapeutic potential for atherosclerotic diseases.

Possible Mechanisms of Actions
Because sIFN{gamma}R treatment did not change serum cholesterol levels, it is plausible that the observed effects are independent of cholesterol levels. The examinations on the tissue gene expressions delineated several possible sites of action of sIFN{gamma}R on the plaque progression and histological stability. First, the antiinflammatory action would be mostly considerable. In atherosclerotic lesions, interferon-{gamma} is produced by T-lymphocytes and activates macrophages and T-lymphocytes.7,8 The activated macrophages are not only transformed to the lipid-laden foam cells but also produce proinflammatory cytokines, which in turn stimulate production of chemokines in the vascular wall cells and adhesion molecules on the ECs and SMCs.6–9 Therefore, interferon-{gamma} creates the self-amplifying cycle of activation of plaque inflammation and recruitment of inflammatory cells, leading to further plaque progression and destabilization. STAT1 phosphorylation was inhibited in atherosclerotic plaques of sIFN{gamma}R-treated ApoE-KO mice (Figure 4), suggesting that overexpressed sIFN{gamma}R blocked the intrinsic interferon-{gamma}–induced signaling in the atherosclerotic lesions. In this study, sIFN{gamma}R treatment attenuated the augmented expressions of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and IL-6), chemokines (MCP-1 and MIP-1{alpha}), and VCAM-1 in ApoE-KO mice in the atherosclerotic stage (Figure 5). Thus, it was likely that sIFN{gamma}R abolished the interferon-{gamma}–induced vicious cycle, being the mechanisms for inhibition of plaque progression and destabilization.

Another important site of action of sIFN{gamma}R would be the ECM homeostasis. sIFN{gamma}R treatment increased fibrous tissue and SMCs in the plaques (Figure 3), associated with procollagen type I induction and MMP-13 and MMP-9 downregulations (Figure 5). These findings were consistent with earlier studies demonstrating that interferon-{gamma} inhibited proliferation and procollagen expression of cultured SMCs32,33 and stimulated MMP production of cultured macrophages and SMCs.34 However, it was suggested that interferon-{gamma} induced SMC proliferation and intimal matrix deposition in animal models of proliferative vascular disorders, such as neointima formation after vascular injury35 and neointima formation in isolated artery segment.36,37 The discrepancy may be explained by the differences in the underlying pathophysiology, the animal species studied, and the interactions of SMCs to the surrounding cells and other humoral factors among these disease models. In the present study, we not only confirmed previous findings in vitro but also showed novel evidence that interferon-{gamma} may participate in destabilization of the advanced plaques by degrading the ECM and by inhibiting intimal SMC proliferation.

The immune mediator CD40L and its receptor CD40 are crucial for initiation of plaque formation and for progression and destabilization of advanced plaques.38 The CD40L signal induces production of cytokines and MMPs.39 As shown in Figure 4B, sIFN{gamma}R treatment reduced the CD40/CD40L expressions in the plaques, suggesting that interferon-{gamma} promotes production of cytokines and MMPs in the plaques through the CD40/CD40L pathway. Several mechanisms for this inhibition of CD40/CD40L system are considered. MCP-1 plays a role in CD40/CD40L inductions in the plaques in ApoE-KO mice.24 In this study, sIFN{gamma}R treatment decreased MCP-1 expression in ApoE-KO mice (Figure 5). Thus, sIFN{gamma}R treatment would have indirectly attenuated the CD40/CD40L expressions by decreasing MCP-1 induction. The decreased CD40/CD40L signals might simply reflect the reduction of infiltrating cells in the plaques, such as macrophages and lymphocytes, which express CD40 or CD40L independently of interferon-{gamma}. However, we observed that sIFN{gamma}R treatment not only reduced the mobilization of peritoneal macrophages but also attenuated the CD40/CD40L expressions of macrophages by the direct action in ApoE-KO mice (supplemental Figure I). Thus, the decreased CD40/CD40L signals in plaques may not simply reflect the reduction of infiltrating cells but may be caused by the direct inhibition of the CD40/CD40L pathway by sIFN{gamma}R treatment.

Lastly, interferon-{gamma} impedes reverse cholesterol transport and promotes the expression of scavenger receptors and the transformation of macrophages and SMCs to foam cells.40,41 Although we did not address this issue in this study, sIFN{gamma}R treatment might have reduced the lipid-rich core through the improvement of reverse cholesterol transport and through the inhibition of foam cell formation.

Potential Merits of Targeting Interferon-{gamma}
Using double knockout mice, recent studies have demonstrated that genetic ablation of proinflammatory molecules, such as IL-1β,42 MCP-1,43 and ICAM-1,44 reduces early development of atherosclerotic lesions in ApoE-KO mice. Also, postnatal inhibition of MCP-1 function by overexpressing a dominant negative mutant of MCP-1, 7ND, has been shown to prevent the growth and destabilization of advanced plaques in ApoE-KO mice.24 As compared with the strategy focusing on each of the molecules, targeting interferon-{gamma} may have an advantage such as a wide-range inhibition of the downstream events, because interferon-{gamma} regulates the multiple steps of development, progression, and destabilization of the plaques,8,9,12 as shown in Figure 5.

Limitations of This Study
Although the long-term effectiveness of sIFN{gamma}R treatment was achieved by repeating sIFN{gamma}R gene transfers, the efficacy of sIFN{gamma}R treatment was partial and the treatment cessation resumed plaque progression. This raises concerns about the potential limitation of this approach. In this regard, the development of recombinant sIFN{gamma}R protein or synthetic peptides containing the pharmacologically active domain of sIFN{gamma}R protein would be a desirable approach, which may be feasible for long-term treatment. However, considering chronic nature of atherosclerosis, prolonged sIFN{gamma}R therapy may not be practical for the prevention of atherosclerosis in humans. Nevertheless, we still think that our approach may have a therapeutic potential because it is well known that cardiovascular events occur because of the rupture of unstable plaques. Our approach did stabilize the lipid- and macrophage-rich advanced plaques (Figure 3). Thus, the stabilization of the unstable plaques would be the potential therapeutic target of postnatal interferon-{gamma} function inhibition during limited treatment period. Although no apparent side effects were found during the period of this study, careful observation is warranted over longer period before the consideration of clinical application because the long-term systemic inhibition of interferon-{gamma} may result in impaired tumor immunosurveilance and susceptibility to microbial infections. To avoid the possible systemic adverse effects, drug-eluting stent or the local delivery of recombinant sIFN{gamma}R protein using nano-particles, which target atherosclerotic plaques, may be desirable.

In conclusion, the present study is the first report showing that postnatal inhibition of interferon-{gamma} prevents progression of existing atherosclerotic plaques and stabilizes the lipid- and macrophage-rich advanced plaques. These findings raised the possibility that the inhibition of interferon-{gamma} pathway is a potential therapeutic target for stabilizing the vulnerable plaques prone to rupture and subsequently for preventing cardiovascular events.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Kaoru Moriyama, Yayoi Yoshida, Reiko Fujiyoshi, Miyuki Ouchida, Miho Kogure, and Kimiko Kimura for their skillful technical assistance.

Sources of Funding

This study was supported in part by a grant for Science Frontier Research Promotion Centers and Grants-In-Aid for Scientific Research (to H.K. and T.I.) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan, and by research grants from Kimura Memorial Heart Foundation (to T.I.).

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
Original received March 10, 2006; resubmission received December 21, 2006; revised resubmission received April 3, 2007; accepted April 30, 2007.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Tahara N, Kai H, Ishibashi M, Nakaura H, Kaida H, Baba K, Hayabuchi N, Imaizumi T. Simvastatin attenuates plaque inflammation -Evaluation by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48: 1825–1831.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Ross R. Atherosclerosis: An inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 115–126.[Free Full Text]

3. Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature. 2002; 420: 868–874.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Gupta S, Pablo AM, Jiang X, Wang N, Tall AR, Schindler C. IFN-gamma potentiates atherosclerosis in ApoE knock-out mice. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99: 2752–2761.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

5. Zhou XH, Paulsson G, Stemme S, Hansson GK. Hypercholesterolemia is associated with a T helper (Th) 1/Th2 switch of the autoimmune response in atherosclerotic apo E-knockout mice. J Clin Invest. 1998; 101: 1717–1725.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Lusis AJ. Atherosclerosis Nature. 2000; 407: 233–241.

7. Young YL, Libby P, Schonbeck U. Cytokines in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Thromb Haemost. 2002; 88: 554–567.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. Schroder K, Hertzog PJ, Ravasi T, Hume DA. Interferon-gamma: An overview of signals, mechanisms and functions. J Leukoc Biol. 2004; 75: 163–189.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Charo IF, Taubaman MB. Chemokines in the pathogenesis of vascular diseases. Circ Res. 2004; 95: 858–866.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Valente AJ, Xie JF, Abramova MA, Wenzel UO, Abboud HE, Graves DT. A complex element regulates IFN-gamma-stimulated monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene transcription. J Immunol. 1998; 161: 3719–3428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Cybulsky MI, Iiyama K, Li H, Zhu S, Chen M, Iiyama M, Davis V, Gutierrez-Ramos JC, Connelly PW, Milstone DS. A major role for VCAM-1, but not ICAM-1, in early atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2001; 107: 1255–1262.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Harvey EJ, Ramji DP. Interferon-{gamma} and atherosclerosis: Pro- or anti-atherogenic? Cardiovasc Res. 2005; 67: 11–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Whitman SC, Ravisankar P, Elam H, Daugherty A. Exogenous interferon-{gamma} enhances atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-/- mice. Am J Pathol. 2000; 157: 1819–1824.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Whitman SC, Ravisankar P, Daugherty A. IFN-gamma deficiency exerts gender-specific effects on atherogenesis in apolipoprotein E-/- mice. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2002; 22: 661–670.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

15. Buono C, Come CE, Stavrakis G, Maguire GF, Connelly PW, Lichtman AH. Influence of interferon-gamma on the extent and phenotype of diet-induced atherosclerosis in the LDLR-deficient mouse. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 454–460.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Piccirillo CA, Prud’homme GJ. Prevention of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis by intramuscular gene transfer with cytokine-encoding plasmid vectors. Hum Gene Ther. 1999; 10: 1915–1922.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Lawson BR, Prud’homme GJ, Chang Y, Gardner HA, Kuan J, Kono DH, Theofilopoulos AN. Treatment of murine lupus with cDNA encoding IFN-gamma R/Fc. J Clin Invest. 2000; 106: 207–215.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

18. Tahara N, Kai H, Niiyama H, Mori T, Sugi Y, Takayama N, Yasukawa H, Numaguchi Y, Matsui H, Okamura K, Imaizumi T. Repeated gene transfers of naked prostacyclin synthase plasmid into skeletal muscles attenuate monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension and prolong survival in rats. Hum Gene Ther. 2004; 15: 1270–1278.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Niiyama H, Kai H, Yamamoto T, Shimada T, Sasaki K, Murohara T, Egashira K, Imaizumi T. Roles of endogenous monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in ischemia-induced neovascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 661–666.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Danko I, Fritz JD, Jiao S, Hogan K, Latendresse JS, Wolff JA. Pharmacological enhancement of in vivo foreign gene expression in muscle. Gene Ther. 1994; 1: 114–121.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

21. Kai H, Griendling KK, Lassegue B, Ollerenshaw JD, Runge MS, Alexander RW. Agonist-induced phosphorylation of the vascular type 1 angiotensin II receptors. Hypertension. 1994; 24: 523–527.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Seki Y, Kai H, Shibata R, Nagata T, Yasukawa H, Yoshimura A, Imaizumi T. Roles of JAK/STAT pathway in rat carotid artery remodeling after vascular injury. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 12–18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Shibata R, Kai H, Seki Y, Kato S, Wada Y, Hanakawa Y, Hashimoto K, Yoshimura A, Imaizumi T. Inhibition of Stat3 prevents neointima formation by inhibiting proliferation and promoting apoptosis of neointimal smooth muscle cells. Human Gene Ther. 2003; 14: 601–610.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Inoue S, Egashira K, Ni W, Kitamoto S, Usui M, Otani K, Ishibashi M, Hiasa K, Nishida K, Takeshita A. Anti-monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene therapy limits progression and destabilization of established atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice. Circulation. 2002; 106: 2700–2706.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Ni W, Egashira K, Kitamoto S, Kataoka C, Koyanagi M, Inoue S, Imaizumi K, Akiyama C, Nishida KI, Takeshita A. New anti-monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene therapy attenuates atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice. Circulation. 2001; 103: 2096–2101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Kai H, Griendling KK, Lassègue B, Fukui T, Minieri CA, Alexander RW. Prolonged exposure to agonist results in a reduction in the levels of the Gq/G11 {alpha}-subunit in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol Pharmacol. 1996; 49: 96–104.[Abstract]

27. Nagata T, Kai H, Shibata R, Koga M, Yoshimura A, Imaizumi T. Oncostatin m, an interleukin-6 family cytokine, upregulates matrix metalloproteinase-9 through the mitogen-activated protein kinase-extracellular signal-regulated kinase pathway in cultured smooth muscle cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 588–593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Kuwahara F, Kai H, Tokuda K, Kai M, Takeshita A, Egashira K, Imaizumi T. Transforming growth factor-β function blocking prevents myocardial fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction in pressure-overloaded rats. Circulation. 2002; 106: 130–135.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Jiao S, Williams P, Berg RK, Hodgeman BA, Liu L, Repetto G, Wolff JA. Direct gene transfer into nonhuman primate myofibers in vivo. Hum Gene Ther. 1992; 3: 21–33.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Herweijer H, Wolf JA. Progress and prospects: Naked DNA gene transfer and therapy. Gene Ther. 2003; 10: 453–458.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Koga M, Kai H, Yasukawa H, Kato S, Yamamoto T, Kawai Y, Kusaba K, Kai M, Egashira K, Kataoka T, Imaizumi T. Atherosclerotic plaque formation was prevented by postnatal blocking of interferon-{gamma} function in apoE-knockout mice. Hypertens Res. 2007; 30: 259–267.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

32. Amento EP, Ehsani N, Palmer H, Libby P. Cytokines and growth factors positively and negatively regulate interstitial collagen gene expression in human vascular smooth muscle cells. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991; 11: 1223–1230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Yuan W, Yufit T, Li L, Mori Y, Chen SJ, Varga J. Negative modulation of alpha1(I) procollagen gene expression in human skin fibroblasts: Transcriptional inhibition by interferon-gamma. J Cell Physiol. 1999; 179: 97–108.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

34. Schonbeck U, Mach F, Sukhova GK, Murphy C, Bonnefoy JY, Fabunmi RP, Libby P. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase expression in human vascular smooth muscle cells by T lymphocytes: A role for CD40 signaling in plaque rupture? Circ Res. 1997; 81: 448–454.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Zohlnhofer D, Richter T, Neumann F, Nuhrenberg T, Wessely R, Brandl R, Murr A, Klein CA, Baeuerle PA. Transcriptome analysis reveals a role of interferon-gamma in human neointima formation. Mol Cell. 2001; 7: 1059–1069.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

36. Tellides G, Tereb DA, Kirkiles-Smith NC, Kim RW, Wilson JH, Schechner JS, Lorber MI, Pober JS. Interferon-gamma elicits arteriosclerosis in the absence of leukocytes. Nature. 2000; 403: 207–211.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

37. Wang Y, Burns WR, Tang PC, Yi T, Schechner JS, Zerwes HG, Sessa WC, Lorber MI, Pober JS, Tellides G. Interferon-gamma plays a nonredundant role in mediating T cell-dependent outward vascular remodeling of allogeneic human coronary arteries. FASEB J. 2004; 18: 606–608.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Schonbeck U, Sukhova GK, Shimizu K, Mach F, Libby P. Inhibition of CD40 signaling limits evolution of established atherosclerosis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97: 7458–7463.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Mach F, Schonbeck U, Libby P. CD40 signaling in vascular cells: A key role in atherosclerosis? Atherosclerosis. 1998; 137: S89–S95.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

40. Li H, Freeman MW, Libby P. Regulation of smooth muscle cell scavenger receptor expression in vivo by atherogenic diets and in vitro by cytokine. J Clin Invest. 1995; 95: 122–133.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

41. Reiss AB, Patel CA, Rahman MM, Chan ES, Hasneen K, Montesinos MC, Trachman JD, Cronstein BN. Interferon-gamma impedes reverse cholesterol transport and promotes foam cell transformation in THP-1 human monocytes/macrophages. Med Sci Monit. 2004; 10: BR420–425.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

42. Kirii H, Niwa T, Yamada Y, Wada H, Saito K, Iwakura Y, Asano M, Moriwaki H, Seishima M. Lack of interleukin-1beta decreases the severity of atherosclerosis in ApoE-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003; 23: 656–660.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Gu L, Okada Y, Clinton SK, Gerard C, Sukhova GK, Libby P, Rollins BJ. Absence of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 reduces atherosclerosis in low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. Mol Cell. 1998; 2: 275–281.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

44. Collins RG, Velji R, Guevara NV, Hicks MJ, Chan L, Beaudet AL. P-selectin or intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 deficiency substantially protects against atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. J Exp Med. 2000; 191: 189–194.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related Article:

Targeting Interferon-{gamma} to Treat Atherosclerosis
Israel Gotsman and Andrew H. Lichtman
Circ. Res. 2007 101: 333-334. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
H. Kudo, H. Kai, H. Kajimoto, M. Koga, N. Takayama, T. Mori, A. Ikeda, S. Yasuoka, T. Anegawa, H. Mifune, et al.
Exaggerated Blood Pressure Variability Superimposed on Hypertension Aggravates Cardiac Remodeling in Rats via Angiotensin II System-Mediated Chronic Inflammation
Hypertension, October 1, 2009; 54(4): 832 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
D. J. Schneider and H. S. Taatjes-Sommer
Augmentation of Megakaryocyte Expression of Fc{gamma}RIIa by Interferon {gamma}
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, July 1, 2009; 29(7): 1138 - 1143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
R. Kleemann, S. Zadelaar, and T. Kooistra
Cytokines and atherosclerosis: a comprehensive review of studies in mice
Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2008; 79(3): 360 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
I. Gotsman and A. H. Lichtman
Targeting Interferon-{gamma} to Treat Atherosclerosis
Circ. Res., August 17, 2007; 101(4): 333 - 334.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
101/4/348    most recent
CIRCRESAHA.106.147256v2
CIRCRESAHA.106.147256v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koga, M.
Right arrow Articles by Imaizumi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koga, M.
Right arrow Articles by Imaizumi, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Other arteriosclerosis
Right arrow Growth factors/cytokines
Right arrow Gene therapy
Right arrowRelated Article