UltraRapid Communication |
From the Departments of Human Genetics (S.S.W., L.I.-D., A.J.L.), Statistics (H.W.), Medicine (X.W., W.S., A.J.L.), and Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (L.I.-D., T.A.D.), University of California at Los Angeles; and Rosetta Inpharmatics LLC/Merck (E.E.S.), Seattle, Wash. Present address for W.S.: Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Correspondence to Aldons J. Lusis, Department of Medicine, 675 Charles E Young Dr South, 3730 MRL, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1679. E-mail jlusis{at}mednet.ucla.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: atherosclerosis quantitative trait locus C3H/HeJ expression arrays sex
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We and others have recently shown that gene transcript levels can provide useful intermediate phenotypes between DNA variation and complex clinically relevant traits such as adiposity in genetic crosses in mice.4–7 Thus, when the transcript levels of genes are quantified using whole-genome expression arrays in segregating populations of mice, the loci determining the levels can be mapped by QTL analysis. The loci, termed expression QTLs or expression QTLs (eQTLs), are considered to be cis-acting if the locus controlling a given transcript maps to the gene encoding that transcript or trans-acting if the locus maps elsewhere. In a cross consisting of 111 female F2 mice derived from the parental strains DBA/2J and C57BL/6J, we identified more than 4000 eQTLs with logarithm of the odds (LOD) scores exceeding 4.3,4 and in a subsequent study, we validated the eQTLs using a classic cis/trans test.8 The cis-acting eQTLs that colocalize with a clinical trait QTLs (cQTLs) are proving very useful in prioritizing positional candidate genes.9–12 More importantly, genes that are likely to be involved in pathways contributing to a clinical trait can be identified by testing for correlations between transcript levels and the clinical trait and then assessing whether these correlated pairs support a causal, reactive or independent relationship with respect to one or more QTLs.13
We report here a large genetic cross in which we have quantified atherosclerotic lesions as well as whole-genome transcript levels, making possible the above approaches. The cross was constructed using 2 strains of mice that differ dramatically in lesion susceptibility: C3H/HeJ (resistant) and C57BL/6J (susceptible). To examine genetic factors contributing to advanced lesions, the cross was performed on the background of an apolipoprotein E (ApoE)-null mutation, and mice were then fed a high-fat "western" diet.14 Our results reveal a highly complex genetic structure for atherosclerosis susceptibility, with 10 loci contributing to lesion development. This contrasts with previous studies that suggested only 1 or 2 significant loci.15,16 The individual loci exhibit striking sex dependence, as most of the loci are sex-biased and some are essentially sex specific. Liver and adipose tissue global gene expression analyses revealed candidate genes and identified pathways associated with atherosclerosis.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Histological Analyses, Lipid Measurements, and Quantification of Atherosclerosis Risk Factors
All 334 aortae were sectioned, and lesions were quantified.21 After the mice were euthanized, the heart and proximal aorta were excised and washed in phosphate-buffered saline. The apex and lower half of the ventricles were removed. The remaining specimen was embedded in Tissue-Tek (Miles), frozen on dry ice, and stored at –80°C until sectioning. Serial cryosections were prepared through the ventricle until the aortic valves appeared. From then on, every fifth 10-µm section was collected on poly-D-lysine–coated slides until the aortic sinus was completely sectioned. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and oil red O, which specifically stains lipids. Slides were examined by light microscopy. The average fatty streak lesion area was quantified throughout the aortic sinus using an ocular with an micrometer-squared grid and was normalized to 40 sections. Plasma triglycerides, total cholesterol, unesterified cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL)/very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), glucose and free fatty acids, as well as hepatic triglycerides, total cholesterol, and unesterified cholesterol were assayed as previously described.21 ELISA assays were used to measure plasma insulin (Alpco Diagnostics, Windham, NH), Mcp-1 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn), leptin (Alpco Diagnostics), and adiponectin (Linco Research Inc, St Charles, Mo) levels.
Linkage and Data Analysis
A 1.5-cM-dense map was constructed using single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers using the multiple inversion probe technology (ParAllele Biosciences, Inc, San Francisco, Calif).22 The SNP map was created according to Celera and National Center for Biotechnology Information public databases. Phenotypic traits were transformed as needed to normalize the residuals, which involved taking the natural log of some of the trait values. Outliers (>3 SD) were omitted. The high density of the SNP marker map allowed the use of single-marker linear regression to model QTL effects,18 instead of inferring genotypes between markers through interval mapping. The general equation for linear regression was: equation
|
|
where yj is the trait value for the jth mouse, ßo is the trait mean, ß1x1j represents the additive effect, ß2x2j represents the dominant effect, and
j is the random error. To determine the genetic contribution to the trait, an F test was performed between the model and the null hypothesis: equation
|
|
Because the distribution of atherosclerosis in males and females was significantly different and we wanted to maximize our power by using all animals, we analyzed all F2 animals together and accounted for sex by adding another variable, ß3x3j, for sex, resulting in this equation: equation
|
|
We were also interested in analyzing genotype–sex interactions. To model sex-additive (sex·add) and sex-dominant (sex·dom) interactive effects, we added 2 more variables, ß4x1jx3j and ß5x2jx3j, respectively, to yield the following models: equation
|
|
|
|
For equations 3, 4 and 5![]()
, QTL analysis was performed using step-wise regression against the sex-only model: equation
|
|
Not every locus exhibited significant sex·add or sex·dom interactions, and therefore inclusion of these terms at such loci decreased the power to detect QTLs.18 To address this, we used a step-wise regression model, the model selection model, where the optimal model was chosen from among the 3 models represented above in equations 3, 4, and 5![]()
for each SNP. The F statistic was used for this purpose. The step-wise procedure was performed as follows:
Step 1
The F test was performed between the model that included sex as a covariate (trait
µ+add+dom+sex) and the null model (trait
µ+sex).
Step 2
The significance of the additive term was assessed. If the additive term was not significant, we concluded there was no genetic contribution from this locus and the current model (trait
µ+add+dom+sex) was the optimal model for this locus. The threshold for significance for this model was LOD>4.1.
Step 3
If the additive component was significant, the sex·add interaction term was considered, such that the model became trait
µ+add+dom+sex+sex·add. The F test was performed between this model and the null model. If this model had a significantly improved fit over the previous model (trait
µ+add+dom+sex) and had a lower Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) than the previous model, then the sex·add term was incorporated into the model. The resulting LOD score had a genome-wide significance threshold of 4.7, where these thresholds are increased compared with those commonly applied23 because of the increased degrees of freedom that result from incorporating sex and sex-by-QTL interactions into the genetic model. If the sex·add term failed to improve the fit of the model or exhibited a higher BIC than the previous model, then the sex·add term was excluded and the model without the sex-by-genotype interaction was the optimal model.
Step 4
If the sex·add term was significant, then the sex·dom term was considered, and thus the model became trait
µ+add+dom+sex+sex·add+sex·dom. If the sex·dom term significantly improved the fit of the data and the BIC of this model (equation 5) was lower than that of the previous model (trait
µ+add+dom+sex+sex·add), it was incorporated into the model and the significant threshold correspondingly increased to 5.3. Probability value thresholds corresponding to significant and suggestive LOD scores were 5x10–5 (genome-wide P<0.05) and 1x10–3, respectively. If the sex·dom term failed to improve the fit of the model or if the model had an increased BIC compared with the previous model, the sex·dom term was dropped and the previous model (trait
µ+add+dom+sex+sex·add) was the optimal model.
We performed 10 000 permutations on the data and computed genome-wide LOD scores for each permutation run and determined the LOD threshold, so that the fraction of eQTLs detected above that threshold in the permuted data were 0.05. To assess whether there were 2 peaks or 1 peak on chromosomes 1, 7, 9, and 11, for each pair of peak markers, we conditioned the trait value on one of the markers and computed the LOD score at the second marker using the residual values and vice versa. If the LOD score was significant under both conditions, then it likely is an independent peak.
QTL analysis was also performed for each sex separately using QTL Cartographer. Interval mapping was performed while considering additive and dominant effects.24 These data were also permuted 10 000 times to establish a LOD score threshold of 4.2 for a genome-wide significance level of 0.05.
ANOVA between markers and traits was calculated using Statview v5.0 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Correlations between lesions and lipids were calculated using the Spearman rank correlation. Data were then graphed in Sigma Plot (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill).
Global Gene Transcript Studies
RNA was isolated from the livers (n=311) and gonadal fat pads (n=305) of F2 mice using the TRIzol method and microarray analysis was performed.4 Briefly, 60mer oligonucleotide chips were used (Agilent Technologies); all hybridizations were performed in duplicate with fluor reversal. Each individual sample was hybridized against the pool of F2 samples. Expression data can be obtained from Geo databases for liver (GSE2814) and adipose tissue (GSE3086). Significantly differentially expressed genes were determined as previously described.25 Expression data in the form of mean log ratios (mlratios) were treated as a quantitative trait in eQTL analysis while taking genotype–sex interactions into account as described above.
eQTLs can be classified as cis- or trans-acting. The eQTLs that mapped to ±20 Mb of the gene encoding the transcript were assumed to correspond to cis-acting variations, although they could be explained by trans-acting effects (for example, by a nearby regulatory gene). The cis-eQTLs that colocalize with a lesion cQTLs within ±20 Mb were considered potential candidate genes for lesions. eQTLs that were not located within ±20 Mb of the gene were assumed to correspond to trans-acting variations in which the transcript abundance of a gene is controlled by a variation in a second, regulatory gene.
Gene Expression–Clinical Trait Correlation and Trait–Trait Correlations
Correlations between gene expression, measured as mlratios, and lesion area were calculated using step-wise linear regression with sex as an interactive covariate: equation
|
|
where yj is the trait value, ßo is the mean mlratio, ß1x1j represents the mlratio effect, ß2x2j represents the sex effect, and ß3x1jx2j is the interaction between expression and sex components. The null hypothesis is the sex only model: equation
|
|
An F test was performed between the full model and the sex-only model. Pearson correlation was also performed and adjusted for sex; both methods delivered similar results.
Correlations between traits were calculated using a partial Pearson correlation accounting for sex.
Pathway Analysis
Canonical pathways analysis is a method of identifying well-established and validated biochemical and functional pathways that are significantly enriched in a data set. We used Ingenuity Pathways Analysis to perform this function (IPA, Ingenuity Systems, Mountain View, CA). We analyzed 2 data sets: the first consisted of genes expressed in the liver that were correlated with atherosclerosis; the second consisted of genes expressed in adipose tissue that were correlated with atherosclerosis. We identified pathways curated by Ingenuity in the Ingenuity Pathways Knowledge Base that were overrepresented in these gene lists. The significance of the association between the data set and the canonical pathway was measured in 2 ways: (1) a ratio of the number of genes from the data set that map to the pathway divided by the total number of genes that map to the canonical pathway is displayed; (2) Fishers exact test was used to calculate a probability value determining the probability that the enrichment between the genes in the dataset and the canonical pathway is explained by chance alone. The probability value is calculated using the right-tailed Fisher Exact Test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
add+dom+sex (Equation 3) and including or excluding the 2 genotype–sex interaction terms based on the fit of the model conditional on realizing a significant additive term. Lod score thresholds for each model were empirically derived for a genome-wide significance level of P<0.05. QTL analysis revealed 7 significant and 3 suggestive QTLs for atherosclerosis (Figure 1 and Table 1). Four significant novel QTLs and 1 suggestive novel QTLs were identified and the previously observed Ath1, Athsq1, Ath19, Ath26, and Ath29 loci15,16,26–28 were replicated. The significant novel QTLs were named according to the standard atherosclerosis QTL nomenclature (Ath30 to -33). Approximately half of the QTLs exhibited codominant heritability, whereas the other half exhibited a dominant effect including Ath1, Athsq1 (males), Ath19 (females), Ath26 (females), Ath31 (females), Ath33 (female), and chromosome 5, where the lesions of the heterozygotes at these loci were not significantly different from one of the parentals, as assessed by ANOVA (Figure 2). The B6 allele was associated with increased lesion size at 8 of the loci, the C3H allele was associated with increased lesions at 1 locus (Ath33) on chromosome 15 and 1 locus on chromosome 4 (Athsq1) exhibited opposing associations dependent on sex.
|
|
|
Sex Effects
Sex had a significant effect on lesion development in this cross. The mean female lesion size was 244 524±8694 µm2, whereas the mean for males was 176 424±7220 µm2 (P<0.0001, SEM t test; Wilcoxon, P<0.0001). Individual QTLs demonstrated sex-influenced effects (Figures 2 and 3![]()
![]()
). Five QTLs were "driven" by females (Figure 1B), whereas males were the main contributors to 1 QTL. Athsq1, which was originally identified in a population of F2 females,26 exhibited "sexual antagonism," (Figure 2) where opposite alleles were associated with increased lesion size dependent on sex. Two sex-specific QTLs were found: Ath30 was specific for females and Ath26 for males. Compared with the model accounting for sex as a covariate, the full model improved QTL detection for 3 loci (Table 1), 2 of which, Athsq1 and Ath26, were not detected using the model only accounting for sex as a covariate (Figure 1A). In addition, analyses of the sexes separately only yielded 5 QTLs for females and 1 for males (Figure 1B). Thus, this model selection procedure, accounting for genotype–sex interactions, can identify QTLs that were not detected using previous models.
|
|
|
Correlations Between Atherosclerosis and Its Various Known Risk Factors
We quantified a variety of risk factors and complications of atherosclerosis to determine their relationship with lesion development in this cross. We performed Pearson correlation incorporating sex as a covariate. The data are summarized in Table 2. Of the traits strongly associated (P<0.005), body weight, plasma triglycerides, HDL and insulin were negatively correlated with atherosclerosis, whereas adiposity, plasma glucose to insulin ratio, and adiponectin were positively correlated.
|
eQTL Approach Reveals Positional Candidate Genes
QTL analysis thus far has identified hundreds of loci for clinical traits but only a handful of genes through positional cloning.29 To accelerate the process of identifying genes underlying QTL for complex phenotypes, we performed eQTL analysis using liver and adipose tissue global gene expression data. As discussed below, these tissues were chosen because they are likely to reflect both lipid-related and inflammatory alterations important in atherosclerosis.
A potentially powerful method for the identification of genes underlying QTLs for complex traits is to prioritize the genes based on coincident cis-eQTLs. However, because approximately 30% of the significant eQTLs in this cross were cis-acting, and because most of the atherosclerosis loci contain hundreds of genes, each of the atherosclerosis loci contain multiple cis-eQTLs. Nevertheless, this list should be useful for future work in which the candidates can be tested by transgenic or other experimental procedures. In the liver, 1857 significant eQTLs, representing 1718 genes, colocalized with at least 1 of the 10 atherosclerosis QTLs within 20 Mb (Table I in the online data supplement). Of these, 652 were cis- and 1205 were trans-eQTLs. In adipose tissue, 1218 significant eQTLs, representing 1142 genes, colocalized with the 10 atherosclerosis cQTLs within 20Mb (supplemental Table II). Of these, 506 were cis- and 712 were trans-eQTLs. When the sexes were analyzed separately, female liver yielded 453 eQTLs (91 cis-, 362 trans-) that colocalized with 5 cQTLs (supplemental Table III), and female adipose yielded 553 eQTLs (37 cis-, 516 trans-) (supplemental Table IV), male liver yielded 32 eQTLs (24 cis-, 8 trans-) (supplemental Table V), and male adipose yielded 26 eQTLs (24 cis-, 2 trans-) (supplemental Table VI) that colocalized with 1 QTLs. As discussed below, a powerful approach for the identification of both cis- and trans-acting genes in a complex trait is to use both colocalization and correlation as criteria.
Gene–Trait Correlation and Pathway Analysis
Another method used to select candidate genes was to identify genes whose expression correlated with lesion size. Step-wise regression was used to model the correlation between gene expression and lesion size while using sex as an interactive covariate (equation 7). We identified 1186 genes in liver (supplemental Table VII) and 1950 genes in adipose tissue (supplemental Table VIII) with expression patterns that were correlated with lesion size at a false discovery rate (FDR)<0.01.30 The overlap between genes with cis-eQTLs colocalizing with QTLs and genes correlated with atherosclerosis reduced the list to 135 genes (supplemental Table IX) in liver and 133 genes (supplemental Table X) in adipose tissue for the 10 QTLs. An abbreviated list of candidate genes is presented in Table 3.
|
When the sexes were analyzed independently, it was found the 1190 genes in female liver were correlated with atherosclerosis (FDR<0.04) (supplemental Table XI) as well as 2167 genes in female adipose (FDR<0.02) (supplemental Table XII), 101 genes in male liver (FDR<0.10) (supplemental Table XIII), and 784 genes in male adipose (FDR<0.10) (supplemental Table XIV). The overlap between cis-eQTLs colocalizing with cQTLs and genes correlated with atherosclerosis yielded 103 genes in female liver (supplemental Table XV), 329 genes in female adipose (supplemental Table XVI), 5 genes in male liver (supplemental Table XVII), and 10 genes in male adipose (supplemental Table XVIII). Females had more atherosclerosis cQTLs, more eQTLs overlapping with those cQTLs, and more genes correlated with atherosclerosis than males.
To identify pathways that were related to atherosclerosis in this cross, we subjected the 1186 significantly correlated genes in the liver to pathway analysis using Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (Ingenuity Systems). One canonical pathway was significantly enriched (P=3.0x10–3 as determined by the Fisher exact test after Bonferroni correction): sterol biosynthesis. Eight of the 19 genes in the pathway were correlated with atherosclerosis, and all 8 genes occurred specifically in the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway (Figure 4A and Table 4). They included Hmgcr, Mvk, Pmvk, Mvd, Fdps, Fdft1, Sqle, and Dhcr7. Because each gene was negatively correlated with atherosclerosis, we hypothesized that cholesterol transport and excretion might also be correlated. We investigated Abca1, Abcg1, Abcg5, and Abcg8 expression patterns and found that Abcg5 and Abcg8 were positively correlated with atherosclerosis (Figure 4B and Table 4). Because the sterol biosynthetic genes were downregulated by cholesterol and the transporters were upregulated, the data suggested that atherosclerosis was associated with increased hepatic cholesterol levels despite the fact that plasma cholesterol levels were negatively correlated with atherosclerosis (Table 2). We subsequently measured hepatic lipid levels and found that hepatic triglycerides were positively correlated with atherosclerosis in males (P=0.02). The 8 cholesterol biosynthesis genes mentioned above were each positively correlated with hepatic triglycerides in males (data not shown). However, we did not find that hepatic total or unesterified cholesterol levels were correlated with lesion size.
|
|
To identify pathways in adipose tissue, the 1950 adipose tissue genes correlated with atherosclerosis were also subjected to enrichment analysis using Ingenuity Systems. One canonical pathway exhibited a trend toward enrichment: the interleukin (IL)-4 pathway (11 of 36 genes) (Figure 5 and Table 5), and 2 pathways were significantly enriched: the B-cell receptor pathway (29 of 114 genes, P=1.3x10–2) (Figure 6
) and oxidative phosphorylation (40 of 139 genes; P=1.2x10–5 after Bonferroni correction) (Figure 7
and Table 6). Most genes in the IL-4 and B-cell receptor pathways were negatively correlated with atherosclerosis, whereas genes comprising complexes I to IV for mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation were all positively correlated with atherosclerosis. These pathways support a role for inflammatory response and oxidative stress in atherogenesis in this cross.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The complexity of atherosclerosis was clearly demonstrated by the identification of 10 QTLs in the BXH ApoE–/– F2 intercross. Five of the QTLs, Ath1, Athsq1, Ath19, Ath26, and Ath29, have been previously reported.15,16,26–28 Tnfsf4, which underlies Ath1,31 did not exhibit any liver eQTLs in the cross, although its receptor, Tnfrsf4, which is physically located within the 95% confidence interval of Athsq1 on chromosome 4, has a cis-eQTL (LOD=3.39). The fact that Tnfsf4 did not exhibit a cis-eQTL in liver or adipose tissue is not unexpected, as it was shown to be expressed in very low levels in both of these tissues.31 Although in our experience, the majority of cis-eQTLs exhibit a similar genetic perturbation in all tissues in which they are expressed, this is not always the case. Moreover, there are sequence differences in the coding region of the gene between C3H and B6 that may influence function.
A recently published and independently generated cross using the same parental strains and diet obtained 2 QTLs on chromosomes 9 and 11.16 The discrepancy in the results between Su et al16 and our cross could be attributable to a number of factors. Su et al used 234 females, fed the mice on a western diet for 12 weeks starting at 6 weeks of age, and scored lesions by averaging the 5 sections from each mouse with the largest lesions. We generated 334 mice of both sexes, fed them on a western diet for 16 weeks starting at 8 weeks of age, and quantified lesions by averaging 40 evenly distributed sections across the aortic sinus. Both of the differences in the duration of the high-fat diet and the method of lesion quantification could well affect the results. With 50% more mice, our cross was more highly powered to detect QTLs with smaller effects, and the contribution of sex to the genetics of atherosclerotic risk factors has been well documented.32–34 The age of the mice could also exhibit a significant effect on lesion progression, size, and composition.35,36 Finally, environmental factors, such as pathogen levels, could also conceivably influence the results. It is noteworthy that 2 surveys of atherosclerosis in different strains of mice fed the "Paigen" diet containing cholic acid, one in a pathogen-free facility and the other in a non–pathogen-free facility, gave strikingly different results.37 On the other hand, Wright et al did not find an effect of a germ-free environment on atherosclerosis in ApoE-null mice.38
Because our mice were placed under very strong atherogenic conditions, the QTLs identified may be specific to ApoE null hyperlipidemia combined with the feeding of the western diet. The western diet induces some metabolic changes that may or may not be influential on lesion development,39 and the same mouse cross on a less fatty diet may not exhibit the same QTLs. Another limitation is that we assayed atherosclerosis at 1 site, the aortic sinus. Although aortic sinus lesion areas correlate well with en face quantifications, they cannot account for differences in lesion development in other vascular beds and thus the importance of a specific QTLs for a particular arterial location.40 Furthermore, the contribution of sex to the different vascular beds cannot be determined. In addition, the pathways identified as correlated to atherosclerosis such as IL-4 may only be relevant to the aortic sinus.41
Sex differences in traits and sex-specific QTLs have been previously reported for atherosclerosis42 and related traits.18,32,43 The causes of sex differences in susceptibility to atherosclerosis have not been completely elucidated, although sex hormones likely play a role. Our findings clearly show that most of our atherosclerosis QTLs exhibit sex bias, with generally larger effects in females than in males. In mouse studies, females usually develop larger lesions than males, in contrast to the reverse situation in humans. It is also noteworthy that 1 locus exhibits a clear sex interaction, with an allele promoting atherosclerosis in 1 sex and inhibiting it in the other. These sex differences in QTL strength, and the sex specificity of other QTLs, imply that different genes cause atherosclerosis in the 2 sexes, or have different levels of contribution to the disease in the 2 sexes, suggesting that different disease mechanisms are at play. This has significant implications in how we assess genetic risk or treat men and women with the "same" disease.
Using our regression model, there are 2 circumstances under which strong sex-specific QTLs can be obtained. The first is where the trait means of the different QTL genotypes are significantly different between the sexes. The differences in means would result in different QTL strengths for females versus males (given a common variation structure) and would be reflected in the regression, which would have different slopes for the different sexes, and the sex-by-genotype interaction term would thus be significant. The second circumstance where sex-specific QTLs are obtained is when the trait means are the same between males and females when split by genotype, but the variation structure for 1 or more of the genotypes is significantly different between the sexes. This is a situation in which the sex-by-genotype term would not be significant because the interaction term can only assess whether the slopes of the regression lines are different, and in this case, they are identical. Because this situation is not detectable by our model selection procedure, it is valuable to calculate QTLs in the sexes independently of identify sex-specific QTLs of this nature (Figure 1B and 3![]()
![]()
). For instance, although Ath30 is a female-specific QTL, the sex-by-genotype term was not significant at this locus (Table 1).
Several traits, either known atherosclerotic risk factors or complications, were correlated with lesion size in this cross. The directions of the correlations for many of these traits are consistent with epidemiological studies, such as the positive correlations with adiposity and glucose to insulin ratio, and negative correlation with plasma HDL levels. Other traits exhibited correlations in a direction opposite of epidemiological data, such as the negative correlation with plasma triglycerides and the positive correlation with plasma adiponectin levels. The negative correlation with triglycerides could be related to the fact that large triglyceride-rich lipoproteins can be excluded from the vessel wall. We found that the majority of the cholesterol biosynthesis pathway genes in liver were positively correlated with plasma triglyceride and insulin levels and negatively correlated with plasma glucose to insulin ratio and adiponectin levels (data not shown). These traits may be related to lesions through this pathway. Likewise, many of the genes in the B-cell receptor pathways in adipose tissue were correlated with plasma insulin, leptin, triglycerides, and weight, whereas many genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation were negatively correlated with weight and insulin. Because these traits are associated with insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome, this cross may be a good model in which to explore the relationships between these traits, pathways, and atherosclerosis.
Several noteworthy genes were included in our list of candidate genes, identified as those with eQTLs colocalizing with lesion QTLs and also correlated with lesion size. For example, Stabilin1 (Stab1) had 3 eQTLs overlapping with atherosclerosis QTLs and was highly correlated with the trait; it is a prime candidate for atherosclerosis susceptibility with its ability to bind advanced glycation end products and acetylated LDL.44,45 It is a scavenger receptor that is expressed in liver sinusoidal endothelial cells and macrophages.46 Stab1 is not located under any of the lesion QTLs, and thus it must be downstream of the primary perturbing genes. Interleukin 18-binding protein (Il18bp), a candidate with 2 overlapping eQTLs, inhibits the binding of IL-18, a cytokine known to promote atherosclerosis in ApoE–/– mice,47 to its receptor48 and thereby slows the progression of lesion development and changes the composition of the plaque to a more stable fibrotic phenotype.49 Moreover, haplotypes of IL-18 have been associated with death from cardiovascular disease in a European population of German nationality.50 Overall, based on eQTL analysis, we have identified 135 candidate genes in liver and 133 in adipose for 10 atherosclerosis QTLs.
Atherosclerosis clearly alters the cellular composition of the vessel wall, and it would seem to be the most obvious site to evaluate by microarray analyses. However, previous microarray studies of the aorta yielded some inflammatory genes51 but did not reveal novel genes or pathways responsible for atherogenesis. We chose to study gene expression in liver and adipose tissue because systemic factors associated with these tissues, such as inflammation, hormones, and lipids, clearly influence atherosclerosis or risk factors based on epidemiologic studies. The liver, which consists mostly of hepatocytes but also contains significant numbers of macrophages and other cell types, has long been known to secrete inflammatory molecules. Recently, it has been shown that in mice fed high-fat diets, up to 50% of gonadal fat pad cells are macrophages,52 a major cell type in atherosclerosis. Thus, we are likely to be directly interrogating the inflammatory state of the animals through both liver and adipose tissue gene expression. Obviously, there are limitations to our study in that some major cell types in atherosclerosis have not been examined. It is also possible that the genes responsible for the disease may not be expressed in the tissues we have studied, or they may not exhibit expression differences or eQTLs. These genes will be missing from this analysis.
Investigation of genes correlated with atherosclerosis revealed that hepatic cholesterol metabolism, inflammation (through the IL-4 and B-cell receptor pathways) and oxidative phosphorylation are likely to play a role in atherogenesis in this cross. The negative correlation between cholesterol metabolism and atherosclerosis was unexpected because plasma cholesterol levels were not associated with atherosclerosis. The IL-4 pathway is known to be both pro- and antiinflammatory53 as well as prooxidant.54 The genes in this pathway are negatively correlated with atherosclerosis, which is consistent with an antiinflammatory role. However, IL-4–/–;ApoE–/– mice exhibited significantly reduced lesions compared with ApoE–/– controls, which implicates IL-4 in the promotion of atherosclerosis.41 In addition, IL-4 has been shown to stimulate reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and macrophage chemotactic protein 1 (Mcp-1) expression and to inhibit nitric oxide bioavailability in endothelial cells.55
The positive correlation between components of complexes I to IV in oxidative phosphorylation and atherosclerosis suggests a role for mitochondrial ROS in lesion formation. Mitochondrial respiration results in the generation of ROS such as superoxide and hydrogen peroxide.56 The positive correlation between the proton electrochemical gradient and ROS production is attributable to the inhibition of electron flow down the electron transport chain, which prolongs the half-life of the intermediates capable of reducing oxygen to superoxide. ROS production can be reduced by uncoupling reagents and proteins that decrease the electrochemical gradient.57 Superoxide activates uncoupling proteins indirectly through lipid peroxidation products and reactive aldehydes. We found that uncoupling protein 2 (Ucp2) expression in the gonadal fat pad was negatively correlated with atherosclerosis in this cross (supplemental Table VIII). Ucp2 expression in macrophages protects against atherosclerosis on the Ldlr–/– background.58 The mechanism proposed is that Ucp2 reduces oxidative stress by promoting the "leakage" of protons across the mitochondrial membrane, thereby reducing membrane potential and superoxide production. A deficiency of Ucp2 in macrophages was associated with increased macrophage content, apoptosis, and nitrotyrosine staining (an indicator of oxidative stress), and decreased collagen content in lesions, which is consistent with a more vulnerable plaque. This supports the hypothesis that mitochondrial damage and dysfunction are major contributors to the development of cardiovascular disease.57 These changes in adipose tissue may affect atherosclerosis in multiple ways. One hypothesis is that macrophages in adipose tissue are reflective of macrophages in the atherosclerotic lesion. Alternatively, macrophages may influence adipose tissue function, which in turn affects atherosclerosis. In addition, because genes involved in energy metabolism emerged as an important functional group, mitochondria-encoded genes, and thus maternal-specific inheritance, may also play a role in atherosclerosis as they also contribute to energy metabolism.
The integration of expression and trait data in a segregating cross provides a powerful tool for the identification of genes and pathways involved in complex traits. Our data support the involvement of specific inflammatory pathways and mitochondrial oxidative stress in atherosclerosis and also provide a list of novel candidate genes. They also reveal a connection between global gene expression in the liver and adipose tissue with atherosclerosis. Identifying pathways relevant to atherosclerosis in these tissues and potential pathway interrelationships suggests that we can track systemic processes affecting lesion development in peripheral tissues.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by NIH grants HL30568 (to A.J.L. and T.A.D.) and HL28481 (to A.J.L.); Public Health Service training grant HD07228-24 (to S.S.W.); and the Iris Cantor–University of California at Los Angeles Womens Health Center, University of California at Los Angeles National Center for Excellence in Womens Health (to T.A.D.). Genotyping was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Mammalian Genotyping Service (contract no. HV48141 to S.S.W.).
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|