| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cellular Biology |
From the Department of Chemical Engineering (L.S.F., H.F.S., R.L.), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass; Center of Neurosciences and Cell Biology (L.S.F.), University of Coimbra, Portugal; Biocant-Biotechnology Innovation Center (L.S.F.), Cantanhede, Portugal; Harvard–Massachusetts Institute of Technology Division of Health Sciences and Technology (S.G., G.V.-N., R.L.), Cambridge, Mass; Whitehead Institute of Biomedical Research (N.W.), Cambridge, Mass; Division of Vascular Biology (M.A.R., S.M.D.), Childrens Hospital, Boston, Mass; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (M.A.R.), Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Mass; and Department of Biomedical Engineering (G.V.-N.), Columbia University, New York.
Correspondence to Robert Langer, Department of Chemical Engineering, E25-342 MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139. E-mail rlanger{at}mit.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-SM actin, SM myosin heavy chain, calponin, caldesmon, SM
-22), and the ability to contract and relax in response to common pharmacological agents such as carbachol and atropine but rarely form capillary-like structures when placed in Matrigel. Implantation studies in nude mice show that both cell types contribute to the formation of human microvasculature. Some microvessels contained mouse blood cells, which indicates functional integration with host vasculature. Therefore, the vascular progenitors isolated from human embryonic stem cells using methods established in the present study could provide a means to examine the mechanisms of endothelial and SM cell development, and they could also provide a potential source of cells for vascular tissue engineering.
Key Words: human embryonic stem cells vascular progenitor cells stem cell differentiation endothelial cells smooth muscle cells
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are a potential cell source for induction of tissue vascularization.7 Prior studies have derived ECs and SMCs cells from a common progenitor (Flk-1+ cells) from mouse6 and monkey ESCs,8 but not from human ESCs (hESCs). We previously reported that hESCs can spontaneously generate ECs with definitive properties.9 These cells were isolated based on the expression of platelet EC-adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM1) from embryoid bodies (EBs) grown in suspension for 13 to 15 days. Using the same endothelial10 or other (eg, CD3411,12) markers, others have isolated endothelial progenitor cells with the ability to differentiate into mature endothelium. In addition, it has been reported that hESCs can differentiate into mesodermal cells that can give rise to ECs and SMCs13; however, it is not clear that these cells were derived from the same progenitor.
Here we report that cells isolated from EBs at day 10 and expressing the hematopoietic/endothelial marker CD34 are vascular progenitor cells that can be selectively induced to differentiate into either endothelial-like (EL) (using endothelial growth medium [EGM-2] containing vascular endothelial growth factor-165 [VEGF165]), or smooth muscle–like (SML) cells (using EGM-2 containing platelet-derived growth factor-BB [PDGFBB]). When implanted in nude mice, these cells contributed to the formation of functional microvessels containing mouse blood cells. This study describes a potential source of cells for vascular tissue engineering and provides a model for the study of vascular differentiation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Culture
hESC lines H9 and H13 with normal karyotype (Figure I in the online data supplement) were grown (passages 25 to 45; WiCell, Madison, Wis) on an inactivated mouse embryonic feeder layer (Cell Essential, Boston, Mass) as previously described.14 The studies were performed with H9 cell line unless otherwise stated. In some cases, CD9+GCTM2+ cells isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) from hESCs were used to characterize the undifferentiated fraction of these cells.15 EB formation and culture, as well as culture of relevant primary cells, can be found in the online data supplement.
Isolation and Culture of CD34+ Cells
Selection of CD34+ cells at day 10 was performed by labeling the hESCs with the anti-CD34 antibody (QBEND/10, Miltenyi Biotec) conjugated with magnetic beads. The magnetically labeled cells were separated into CD34+ and CD34– populations using a LS-MACS column (Miltenyi Biotec). CD34 enrichment was confirmed by flow cytometry analysis using a different anti-CD34 antibody (AC136; Miltenyi Biotec). Isolated CD34+ cells were grown on 24-well plates (3x104 cells/well) coated with 1% gelatin and containing EGM-2, or EGM-2 supplemented with VEGF165 (50 ng/mL, R&D Systems) or PDGFBB (50 ng/mL, R&D Systems).
Transplantation in Nude Mice
EL or SML cells alone (third passage, 0.5x106 cells in
20 µL of EGM-2), or EL cells mixed with SML cells (3:1; 0.5x106 cells in total, in 20 µL of EGM-2) were suspended in 0.350 mL of Matrigel (BD Biosciences) on ice. The cell suspension was injected subcutaneously (23-gauge needle) in each side of the dorsal region of a 4-week-old male balb/c nude mice (2 implants per mouse; 3 mice per experimental condition). Matrigel without cells was used as control. After 28 days, the implants were removed, fixed overnight in 10% (vol/vol) buffered formalin at 4°C, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned for histological examination.
Histological Examination
Immunohistochemical staining of explants from animal studies was performed using the EnVision+/HRP kit (Dako) with prior heat treatment at 95°C for 20 minutes in ReVeal buffer (Biocare Medical) or trypsin (1 mg/mL) for epitope recovery. For immunofluorescent staining, anti-mouse IgG Cy3 conjugate was used as secondary antibody followed by DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) nuclear staining. The primary antibodies were anti-human PECAM1 (1:20), anti-human collagen type IV (1:500, Sigma), anti–
-smooth muscle actin (
-SMA) (1:50), anti-human nuclei (1:20, Chemicon), ß2-microglobulin (1:50, BD Pharmingen), and the corresponding isotype controls. Biotinylated Ulex europaeus agglutinin-1 (UEA-1, 1:100; Vector Laboratories) was also used for histological staining. The number of microvessels that were immunoreactive for human collagen type IV was counted in 7 random fields from at least four implants (2 sections for each implant) at x20 magnifications (corresponding to an area of 3.4x105 µm2).
FACS Analysis
Undifferentiated hESCs, HUVECs, or CD34+ cells grown in different growth media were dissociated with nonenzymatic cell dissociation solution (Sigma) for 10 minutes. EBs were dissociated with 0.4 U/mL collagenase B (Roche Diagnostics) for 2 hours in a 37°C incubator, followed by treatment with cell dissociation solution for 10 minutes, followed by gentle pipetting. Single cells were aliquoted (1.25 to 2.5x105 cells were used per condition) and stained with either isotype controls or antigen-specific antibodies. A detailed list of the antibodies used and the staining procedure can be found in the online data supplement.
Western Blot Analysis
Cells differentiated for 3 passages were harvested using trypsin and lysed as reported elsewhere.16 Briefly, sample loading buffer and reducing agent (both from Bio-Rad) were added to the lysates. Samples were heated (5 minutes, 95°C) and loaded on 4% to 15% Tris-HCl Criterion gels (Bio-Rad), separated by SDS-PAGE, and transferred to nitrocellulose. Membranes were probed for smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SM-MHC) (8.5 µg/mL, DakoCytomation),
-SMA (0.7 µg/mL, DakoCytomation), and PECAM1 (2 µg/mL; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Blot blocking and development procedures can be found in the online data supplement.
RT-PCR Analysis
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Total RNA was quantified by a UV spectrophotometer, and 1 µg was used for each reverse-transcription sample. RNA was reversed transcripted with M-MLV and oligo (dT) primers (Promega) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. PCRs were done with BIOTAQ DNA polymerase (Bioline) using 1 µL of reverse-transcription product per reaction. To ensure semiquantitative results of the RT-PCR assays, the number of PCR cycles for each set of primers was verified to be in the linear range of the amplification. In addition, all RNA samples were adjusted to yield equal amplification of GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) as an internal standard. Primer sequences, reaction conditions, and optimal cycle numbers are published as supporting information (supplemental Table I). The amplified products were separated on 2% agarose gels with ethidium bromide.
Statistical Analysis
An unpaired Student t test or 1-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni post test were performed for statistical tests by using GraphPad Prism 4.0 (San Diego, Calif). Results were considered significant when P
0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-SMA and SM-MHC),6,8,13,17–19 and undifferentiated ESC markers (SSEA4, Nanog, and alkaline phosphatase)20 at the gene and protein levels. Initially, hESCs expressed low or undetectable levels of CD34 and PECAM1, significant levels of KDR/Flk-1, and moderate levels of
-SMA and SM-MHC (Figure 1A and 1B). The expression of KDR/Flk-1 coexisted with the expression of undifferentiated stem cell markers Nanog (Figure 1A), SSEA4, and alkaline phosphatase, showing that cells are undifferentiated.
|
The removal of undifferentiated hESCs from mouse embryonic feeder layers and subsequent culture as EBs in differentiation medium containing KO-SR reduced the expression of alkaline phosphatase and SSEA4, indicating that cells were undergoing differentiation (Figure 2A.1). During this differentiation process,
-SMA and SM-MHC were highly expressed for 10 days (Figure 2A.1), expression of CD34 peaked around day 10, KDR/Flk-1 expression decreased by day 4 and remained low thereafter, and PECAM1 expression was low through the 12 days of differentiation (Figure 2A.2).
|
Next, we evaluated the effect of serum supplementation on EB differentiation. Use of FBS instead of KO-SR resulted in a slightly accelerated differentiation process, as indicated by the further decrease of alkaline phosphatase and SSEA4 levels and a significant (P<0.05) increase in the expression of CD34 (Figure 2A.1). EBs grown in medium containing FBS showed lower expression of
-SMA and SM-MHC than EBs grown in medium containing KO-SR. Taken together, medium supplementation with FBS enhanced the vascular differentiation of cells in EBs and contributed to high yields of CD34+ cells.
Formation of Vessel-Like Structures in EBs
Confocal analysis of EBs cultured for 10 days showed that CD34+ cells formed extensive vascular networks (Figure 2B.1). The vessel-like structures resembled those we previously observed in PECAM1+ cells9; however, these structures were more frequent for CD34+ than for PECAM1+ cells (Figure 2B.1 and 2B.2). FACS analysis confirmed that all PECAM1+ cells coexpressed CD34 (supplemental Figure II).
Isolation of CD34+ Cells
A CD34 marker was used to isolate vascular progenitor cells by magnetic selection from EBs grown in differentiation medium with FBS for 10 days (Figure 3A). These conditions were selected because of high expression of CD34 during EB development (Figure 2A.1 and 2A.2). The cells isolated were 92.5±6.7% (n=3) pure for CD34 antigen (approximately a 9-fold enrichment of the initial cell population). At this stage, CD34+ cells coexpressed high levels of PECAM1 (
55%),
-SMA (
45%), and SSEA4 (
43%), moderate levels of KDR/Flk-1 (
16%), and low levels of the hematopoietic marker CD45 (
1%) (Figure 3B). The presence of these markers was also confirmed at gene level (Figure 3C).
|
Induction of CD34+ Cell Differentiation Into Endothelial and SMC Lineages
The isolated CD34+ cells were cultured with EGM-2 alone or medium supplemented with VEGF165 (50 ng/mL) or PDGFBB (50 ng/mL) (Figure 3A) because VEGF165 and PDGFBB have been reported to facilitate the differentiation of stem cells into ECs and SMCs, respectively.6,19 CD34+ cells cultured in VEGF-supplemented EGM-2 for 1 passage (10 to 15 days after cell seeding) expressed high levels of EC markers (Figure 4A). Similar results were obtained with H13 cell line (supplemental Figure III). As compared with human umbilical vein ECs (HUVECs), CD34+ cells had slightly lower expression of PECAM1 and KDR/Flk-1 (Figure 4A), and higher expression of CD34. At this stage, the cells lost nearly all expression of the marker SSEA4, indicating their differentiated state. CD34– cells grown in the same conditions as CD34+ cells showed minimal expression of the endothelial markers (supplemental Figure IV), indicating that CD34+ cells, but not the CD34– cells, can be effectively induced toward an endothelial lineage. CD34+ cells cultured in EGM-2 or EGM-2 supplemented with PDGFBB for 1 passage showed a much lower expression of PECAM1 (26% and 18%, respectively) than the CD34+ cells cultured in VEGF-supplemented medium (94%) (supplemental Figure IV). As EGM-2 contains <5 ng/mL VEGF165 (as measured by ELISA), VEGF concentration appears to have an important role in the endothelial differentiation of CD34+ cells.
|
The proliferation rate of CD34+ cells cultured in VEGF-supplemented medium is high, achieving 20 population doublings over a 2-month period. FACS analyses of CD34+ cells cultured for 3 passages (Figure 4A) showed the expression of PECAM1 comparable to that in HUVECs (similar results were obtained by Western blot; Figure 4B and 4C), albeit different regarding the expression of CD34 and KDR/Flk-1 markers. Karyotyping analyses showed that genetic integrity was preserved during differentiation (supplemental Figure V). Differentiated CD34+ cells stained positively for vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin at cell–cell adherent junctions, produced von Willebrand factor, and were able to incorporate acetylated low-density lipoprotein (Figure 5A), typical markers found in ECs (supplemental Figure VI). Genetic analysis demonstrated that these cells express PECAM1, CD34, VE-cadherin, von Willebrand factor, and Tie2 receptor19 but are negative for SMC markers including SM-MHC, SM
-22, and angiopoietin-16,17,21 (Figure 5E). CD34+ cells isolated from H13 cell line and differentiated in VEGF-supplemented medium presented lower levels of PECAM1 (39% versus 98%) and CD34 (14% versus 65%) compared with the H9 cell line (supplemental Figure III), suggesting slightly different differentiation profiles in the 2 cell lines.
|
Cells cultured in EGM-2 or PDGFBB-supplemented medium for 3 passages expressed high levels of
-SMA, SM-MHC, and calponin (Figures 4 and 5
B), low levels of endothelial markers (
20%), and no detectable expression of the undifferentiating stem cell marker SSEA4. Western blot analysis showed that expressions of SM-MHC and
-SMA were higher in cells differentiated in EGM-2 supplemented with PDGFBB (Figure 4B and 4C). As confirmed by RT-PCR (Figure 5E), PDGFBB-supplemented EGM-2 upregulated the expression of definitive SMC markers including caldesmon and SM
-22,17,21 and the expression of angiopoietin-1, a ligand produced by SMCs that activates the receptor Tie-2 found on ECs.22 This indicates that the presence of PDGFBB contributed to cell maturation toward SMC phenotype. However, this process is not complete because cells express the endothelial markers angiopoietin-2 and Tie2. To examine whether these SML cells were functional, they were subjected to the effects of carbachol and atropine23 (supplemental Figure VII). After exposure to carbachol (10–5 mol/L) the cells contracted 30% after 30 minutes. In addition, the muscarinic antagonist atropine was shown to block the carbachol-mediated effects. Similar results were obtained in human vascular SMCs (hVSMCs). CD34+ cells grown in the presence of PDGF had higher proliferation rates than CD34+ cells grown in the presence of VEGF, with 42 population doublings over a 2-month period. Karyotyping analyses showed that genetic integrity was preserved during differentiation (supplemental Figure V).
The ability of CD34+ cells differentiated in VEGF or PDGF-supplemented medium to form cord-like structures was also assessed by culturing these cells in the extracellular matrix basement membrane, Matrigel.9,13,24 CD34+ cells differentiated in VEGF-supplemented medium were able to spontaneously reorganize into cord-like structures when maintained in culture for 24 hours (Figure 5C and supplemental Figure VIII). In contrast, CD34+ cells differentiated in EGM-2 containing PDGFBB have limited ability to form cord-like structures (Figure 5C). Transmission electron micrographs of cord sections formed by CD34+ cells differentiated in VEGF165-supplemented medium showed the presence of a lumen (Figure 5D.1), thus confirming the capacity of these cells to form vascular networks in vitro. In addition, these cells presented typical endothelial features (supplemental Figure VI) such as the presence of round or rod-shaped structures that resemble Weibel–Palade bodies and tight junctions between cells (Figure 5D.2). Based on the phenotype and genotype expression, the CD34+ cells differentiated in VEGF165 or PDGFBB-supplemented medium were designated EL and SML cells, respectively.
Transplantation of EL and SML Cells Into Nude Mice Resulted in Formation of Microvessels
EL or SML cells alone or EL mixed with SML cells (3:1 ratio) were suspended in Matrigel and injected subcutaneously in the dorsal region of nude mice. After 28 days, the mice were injected intravenously with fluorescein isothiocyanate–dextran solution. The Matrigel implants were then removed and imaged. Microvessels that support blood flow were observed in Matrigel implants containing EL or SML cells but rarely in Matrigel without cells (supplemental Figure IX). Matrigel implanted in the absence of cells showed no microvessels inside of the matrix, only at the periphery (Figure 6A). The constructs with EL cells showed the presence of microvessels within the Matrigel (Figure 6B.1), most of which (
95%) were patent with empty lumens, whereas a small percentage (
5%; Figure 6B.2) contained mouse red blood cells. These microvessels were reactive for UEA-1 (specific for human ECs25), anti-human PECAM1, anti-human nuclei, and anti-human collagen type IV (collagen IV is a component of the extracellular matrix actively produced by ECs26) (Figure 6.B and supplemental Figures X and XI), indicating that they were composed of human ECs. In general, the cells and microvessels inside Matrigel were not reactive for
-SMA (Figure 6B.5). On the other hand, implants formed by a mixture of EL and SML showed the presence of microvessels that were immunoreactive to the same human markers described above (Figure 6C). A fraction of these microvessels (
5% to 6%) contained mouse blood cells (Figure 6C.1). Cells inside Matrigel stained positively for PECAM1 (
41%) or
-SMA (
20%); in this last case, they formed small tubules (Figure 6C.4) or surrounded human microvessels (Figure 6C.5; supplemental Figure XI). Thus, these cells have properties of SM cells. Constructs with only SML cells stained for
-SMA (supplemental Figure XI) showing the differentiation of these cells into the SMC lineage.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One of the specific limitations of our study is that single cell isolation and parallel divergence of its progeny was not performed. This issue should be addressed in future studies to show that the EB-derived CD34+ cell that becomes a SML with PDGF exposure is the same cell that becomes an EL with VEGF exposure.
CD34 marker was selected to isolate vascular progenitor cells for several reasons. First, previous studies showed that CD34+ cells from human blood cells could give rise to ECs and SMCs.18,19,27,28 Second, human EBs express this marker at higher levels than other endothelial markers including KDR/flk-1 and PECAM1. Third, CD34 is upregulated during differentiation of human EBs, in contrast to KDR/Flk-1, and all the cells that stained positively for PECAM1 on day 10 coexpress CD34. Fourth, CD34+ cells form vessel-like structures within EBs.
The composition of differentiation medium exerts a significant effect on the differentiation of EBs and yield of CD34+ cells. EBs grown in differentiation medium containing KO-SR yield fewer CD34+ cells than EBs grown in differentiation medium containing FBS. This suggests that factors present in FBS but not in KO-SR may play an important role in the vascular differentiation of hESCs. Furthermore, our data indicate that EBs grown in FBS media differentiate more rapidly than EBs grown in KO-SR media. This agrees with previous studies showing that KO-SR contribute for an increase growth rate of undifferentiated cells.29
Recently, it has been reported that CD34+CD31+KDR+12 or CD34+11 cells isolated from hESCs and differentiated in the absence12 or presence11 of VEGF165, respectively, can give rise to ECs. Our data show that CD34+ cells cultured in the presence of VEGF165 differentiated into EL cells, as confirmed by their morphology, biochemical markers, and functional studies. We further demonstrate that the levels of VEGF have an important role in the differentiation of CD34+ cells into ECs. This effect has not been previously described. When CD34+ cells are cultured in EGM-2 (low levels of VEGF), only
26% express PECAM1 marker after the first passage, and they start to lose this marker after several passages. This may indicate that other cell types take over the cell culture likely attributable to a high proliferation rate, or that the starting cells may differentiate into other cell types. It should be noted that only CD34+ cells, not CD34–, cells express significant levels of endothelial markers when exposed to VEGF-enriched medium, which shows that medium alone is not sufficient for the differentiation of hESCs into the vascular cell lineage. Our results also show that the differentiation of CD34+ cells into the endothelial lineage is slightly different for H9 and H13 cell lines. It is unclear whether this is attributable to the presence of different populations of ECs, as shown in other ESCs,24 or differences in the differentiation profile in both cell lines.
In this study, we showed the transplantation of EL cells into nude mice using Matrigel as scaffold contributed for the formation of human microvessels (Figure 6). In some cases, these microvessels contained mouse blood cells and supported blood flow, suggesting that these vessels anastomosed with the host vasculature. Our data agree with a study published during the reviewing process of this work, reporting that the transplantation of CD34+ cells, isolated from hESCs, in mice contributed to the formation of blood vessels that integrated into the host circulatory system.30
We also demonstrated that CD34+ cells can give rise to SML cells and that PDGF plays an important role in this differentiation process. It has been reported that PDGFBB promotes the differentiation of mouse ESCs and CD34+ cells isolated from human blood into SMCs.6,13,19 CD34+ cells cultured in EGM-2 containing PDGFBB for 3 passages show minimal expression of EC markers but significant expression of SMC markers. The expression of SMC markers was also observed in cells grown in EGM-2 alone. However, the expression of SM-MHC, a later marker in SMC differentiation that is not detected in other cell types,31 was higher in PDGF conditions. In addition, upregulation of SM
-22, caldesmon, and angiopoietin-1, known markers for maturing SMCs,17,21 was achieved only in differentiating CD34+ cells in PDGF-enriched medium. Furthermore, these cells seem functionally different from those differentiated in EGM-2 or VEGF-supplemented EGM-2 because they rarely form cord-like structures on Matrigel. Our data also suggest that the differentiation of SML is not complete because these cells express a low percentage of PECAM1 (
5%) and CD34 (
1%) markers and genotypically express Tie2 and angiopoietin-2 markers known to be displayed by ECs. SML cells have the ability to contract or relax in response to a variety of pharmacological agents like SMCs18,23 and thus are functional. When SML cells were transplanted into nude mice, using Matrigel as scaffold,
-SMA+ cells were observed, forming either small tubules or surrounding microvessels.
Future studies should include further analysis of the molecular mechanism underlying vascular lineage differentiation and the influence of other growth factors in this process. It would be also important to test new scaffolds to improve the in vivo engraftment of these cells with the host vasculature of ischemic animal models.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This study was supported by NIH grants HL060435, DE13023, and HL076485; Funda
ão para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/ BPD/14502/2003; fellowship to L.S.F.); and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (a fellowship to S.G. and a grant to G.V.-N.).
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Jain RK, Au P, Tam J, Duda DG, Fukumura D. Engineering vascularized tissue. Nat Biotechnol. 2005; 23: 821–823.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Koike N, Fukumura D, Gralla O, Au P, Schechner JS, Jain RK. Tissue engineering: creation of long-lasting blood vessels. Nature. 2004; 428: 138–139.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Darland DC, DAmore PA. Blood vessel maturation: vascular development comes of age. J Clin Invest. 1999; 103: 157–158.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Levenberg S, Rouwkema J, Macdonald M, Garfein ES, Kohane DS, Darland DC, Marini R, van Blitterswijk CA, Mulligan RC, DAmore PA, Langer R. Engineering vascularized skeletal muscle tissue. Nat Biotechnol. 2005; 23: 879–884.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Yamashita J, Itoh H, Hirashima M, Ogawa M, Nishikawa S, Yurugi T, Naito M, Nakao K, Nishikawa S. Flk1-positive cells derived from embryonic stem cells serve as vascular progenitors. Nature. 2000; 408: 92–96.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Rafii S, Lyden D. Therapeutic stem and progenitor cell transplantation for organ vascularization and regeneration. Nat Med. 2003; 9: 702–712.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Sone M, Itoh H, Yamashita J, Yurugi-Kobayashi T, Suzuki Y, Kondo Y, Nonoguchi A, Sawada N, Yamahara K, Miyashita K, Park K, Shibuya M, Nito S, Nishikawa S, Nakao K. Different differentiation kinetics of vascular progenitor cells in primate and mouse embryonic stem cells. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2085–2088.
9. Levenberg S, Golub JS, Amit M, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Langer R. Endothelial cells derived from human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 4391–4396.
10. Wang L, Li L, Shojaei F, Levac K, Cerdan C, Menendez P, Martin T, Rouleau A, Bhatia M. Endothelial and hematopoietic cell fate of human embryonic stem cells originates from primitive endothelium with hemangioblastic properties. Immunity. 2004; 21: 31–41.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Chen T, Bai H, Shao Y, Arzigian M, Janzen V, Attar E, Xie Y, Scadden DT, Wang ZZ. Stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCR4 signaling modifies the capillary-like organization of human embryonic stem cell-derived endothelium in vitro. Stem Cells. 2007; 25: 392–401.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Vodyanik MA, Thomson JA, Slukvin II. Leukosialin (CD43) defines hematopoietic progenitors in human embryonic stem cell differentiation cultures. Blood. 2006; 108: 2095–2105.
13. Gerecht-Nir S, Ziskind A, Cohen S, Itskovitz-Eldor J. Human embryonic stem cells as an in vitro model for human vascular development and the induction of vascular differentiation. Lab Invest. 2003; 83: 1811–1820.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Amit M, Carpenter MK, Inokuma MS, Chiu CP, Harris CP, Waknitz MA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Thomson JA. Clonally derived human embryonic stem cell lines maintain pluripotency and proliferative potential for prolonged periods of culture. Dev Biol. 2000; 227: 271–278.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Zambidis ET, Peault B, Park TS, Bunz F, Civin CI. Hematopoietic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells progresses through sequential hematoendothelial, primitive, and definitive stages resembling human yolk sac development. Blood. 2005; 106: 860–870.
16. Dallabrida SM, Ismail N, Oberle JR, Himes BE, Rupnick MA. Angiopoietin-1 promotes cardiac and skeletal myocyte survival through integrins. Circ Res. 2005; 96: e8–e24.
17. Duband JL, Gimona M, Scatena M, Sartore S, Small JV. Calponin and SM 22 as differentiation markers of smooth muscle: spatiotemporal distribution during avian embryonic development. Differentiation. 1993; 55: 1–11.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Le Ricousse-Roussanne S, Barateau V, Contreres JO, Boval B, Kraus-Berthier L, Tobelem G. Ex vivo differentiated endothelial and smooth muscle cells from human cord blood progenitors home to the angiogenic tumor vasculature. Cardiovasc Res. 2004; 62: 176–184.
19. Simper D, Stalboerger PG, Panetta CJ, Wang S, Caplice NM. Smooth muscle progenitor cells in human blood. Circulation. 2002; 106: 1199–1204.
20. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, Jones JM. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998; 282: 1145–1147.
21. Faggin E, Puato M, Zardo L, Franch R, Millino C, Sarinella F, Pauletto P, Sartore S, Chiavegato A. Smooth muscle-specific SM22 protein is expressed in the adventitial cells of balloon-injured rabbit carotid artery. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999; 19: 1393–1404.
22. Suri C, Jones PF, Patan S, Bartunkova S, Maisonpierre PC, Davis S, Sato TN, Yancopoulos GD. Requisite role of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, during embryonic angiogenesis. Cell. 1996; 87: 1171–1180.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Rodriguez LV, Alfonso Z, Zhang R, Leung J, Wu B, Ignarro LJ. Clonogenic multipotent stem cells in human adipose tissue differentiate into functional smooth muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103: 12167–12172.
24. Kaufman DS, Lewis RL, Hanson ET, Auerbach R, Plendl J, Thomson JA. Functional endothelial cells derived from rhesus monkey embryonic stem cells. Blood. 2004; 103: 1325–1332.
25. Skovseth DK, Yamanaka T, Brandtzaeg P, Butcher EC, Haraldsen G. Vascular morphogenesis and differentiation after adoptive transfer of human endothelial cells to immunodeficient mice. Am J Pathol. 2002; 160: 1629–1637.
26. Yang J, Nagavarapu U, Relloma K, Sjaastad MD, Moss WC, Passaniti A, Herron GS. Telomerized human microvasculature is functional in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 2001; 19: 219–224.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, Silver M, van der Zee R, Li T, Witzenbichler B, Schatteman G, Isner JM. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997; 275: 964–967.
28. Yeh ET, Zhang S, Wu HD, Korbling M, Willerson JT, Estrov Z. Transdifferentiation of human peripheral blood CD34+-enriched cell population into cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells in vivo. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2070–2073.
29. Skottman H, Stromberg AM, Matilainen E, Inzunza J, Hovatta O, Lahesmaa R. Unique gene expression signature by human embryonic stem cells cultured under serum-free conditions correlates with their enhanced and prolonged growth in an undifferentiated stage. Stem Cells. 2006; 24: 151–167.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Wang ZZ, Au P, Chen T, Shao Y, Daheron LM, Bai H, Arzigian M, Fukumura D, Jain RK, Scadden DT. Endothelial cells derived from human embryonic stem cells form durable blood vessels in vivo. Nat Biotechnol. 2007; 25: 317–318.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Miano JM, Cserjesi P, Ligon KL, Periasamy M, Olson EN. Smooth muscle myosin heavy chain exclusively marks the smooth muscle lineage during mouse embryogenesis. Circ Res. 1994; 75: 803–812.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. P Sieveking and M. K. Ng Cell therapies for therapeutic angiogenesis: back to the bench Vascular Medicine, May 1, 2009; 14(2): 153 - 166. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yamahara and H. Itoh Potential use of endothelial progenitor cells for regeneration of the vasculature Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, February 1, 2009; 3(1): 17 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Xu Stem Cells and Transplant Arteriosclerosis Circ. Res., May 9, 2008; 102(9): 1011 - 1024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Chen, J. M. Abrahams, L. M. Smith, J. H. McVey, R. I. Lechler, and A. Dorling Regenerative repair after endoluminal injury in mice with specific antagonism of protease activated receptors on CD34+ vascular progenitors Blood, April 15, 2008; 111(8): 4155 - 4164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Fischer, C. H. Cunliffe, R. J. Bollo, S. Raza, D. Monoky, L. Chiriboga, E. C. Parker, J. G. Golfinos, P. J. Kelly, E. A. Knopp, et al. High-grade glioma before and after treatment with radiation and Avastin: Initial observations Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2008; 10(5): 700 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |