| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integrative Physiology |
From the Departments of Pharmacology (M.A.Z., A.W.M., L.V.P.), Biochemistry and Biophysics (W.Y., T.M.L., L.V.P.), Cell and Molecular Physiology (D.C., J.E.F.), Cell and Developmental Biology (M.D.S.), and Ophthalmology (M.E.H.), Carolina Cardiovascular Biology Center (J.E.F., L.V.P.), and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (L.V.P.), The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Correspondence to Leslie V. Parise, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB#7260, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7260. E-mail parise{at}med.unc.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: angiogenesis endothelial cells ischemia CIB1 PAK1
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CIB1 (also known as calmyrin or kinase-interacting protein [KIP]) is a 22-kDa EF-hand–containing protein identified originally in a yeast 2-hybrid screen as a binding partner for the cytoplasmic tail of the platelet integrin
IIb.8 It was later determined that CIB1 inhibits agonist-induced
IIbß3 activation in megakaryocytes.9 However, CIB1 is widely distributed, suggesting that it has cellular functions independent of
IIbß3.10 Accordingly, CIB1 appears to regulate various cellular processes by associating with proteins such as the Alzheimers disease associated presenilin-2,11 the inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate receptor,12 focal adhesion kinase (FAK),13 and p21-activated kinase (PAK)1.14 Among these binding partners, FAK and PAK1 are known to regulate EC function and in vivo angiogenesis.15,16
We recently engineered a CIB1-deficient (CIB1–/–) mouse via homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Although CIB1–/– mice reach all developmental milestones, adult male mice are sterile because of a defect in the haploid phase of spermatogenesis.17 Here we demonstrate that loss of CIB1 attenuates PAK1 and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 activation and MMP-2 expression. We also demonstrate that CIB1 is critical for various EC functions and that CIB1–/– mice have significant defects in growth factor- and ischemia-induced pathological and adaptive angiogenesis. Therefore, our studies identify CIB1 as a target for therapy in angiogenesis-dependent clinical disorders.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Boyden Chamber Haptotactic, Matrigel Tubule Formation, and ELISA Assays
Haptotactic migration and tubule formation were performed as described previously with minor modifications.14 These assays and ELISA proliferation assays are described in the online data supplement.
PAK1 Kinase Activation Assay
Lysates of fibronectin-adherent ECs or ischemic and nonischemic gastrocnemius muscles were prepared by addition of cold lysis buffer, supplemented with 10% glycerol and 0.2 mmol/L pervanadate. Kinase assays were performed as described previously.14,18 For each experiments, n=3.
Gelatin Zymography
The activity of MMP-2 in conditioned media was determined by gelatin zymography. Briefly, ECs were serum starved for at least 24 hours, followed by addition of phenol-free basal medium supplemented with 100 ng/mL of growth factor. After 18 hours, conditioned media were collected, filtered through 0.45-µm Whatman filters, and concentrated using a Vivaspin 10-kDa concentrator (Sartorius, Edgewood, NY). Equal protein concentrations were loaded under nonreducing conditions onto premade 10% zymograms and developed according to the instructions of the manufacture (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif). For each experiment, n=3.
Ex Vivo Tissue Cultures
Tissue culturing was performed as described previously with minor modifications.19,20 Wild-type (WT) and CIB1–/– aortic rings were embedded between 2 layers of 250 µL of growth factor–reduced Matrigel in a 24-well culture format and cultured in 300 µL of growth media or basal media supplemented with 50 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). At 2, 5, and 8 days, images of aortic rings were collected and stitched together using PhotoFit Premium software (Tekmate, Tokyo, Japan). At each time point, the total number of sprouting microvessels were counted using ImageJ as described previously19 (n=8 per group). Identical procedures were used for the tibialis anterior muscle cultures and were analyzed in a similar manner after 8 days of culturing.
In Vivo Matrigel Plug Assay
Matrigel plug assays were performed as described previously,21 with minor modifications. WT and CIB1–/– mice were subcutaneously injected with
300 µL of growth factor–reduced Matrigel mixed with 60 U/mL heparin or with heparin plus 250 ng/mL bFGF or VEGF. After 14 days, plugs were isolated along with adjacent skin and peritoneal muscle, fixed, and sectioned at interrupted intervals. Blood vessel infiltration was analyzed in 4 random hematotoxin/eosin (H&E)-stained interrupted sections using a Nikon inverted microscope and expressed as mean values of infiltrating blood vessels per plug (n=3 per group).
Oxygen-Induced Retinal Angiogenesis Assay
Postnatal day 7 (P7) mice were placed in 75% oxygen for 5 days. Following hyperoxic incubation, P12 CIB1–/– and WT neonatal mice were housed for 5 additional days under normoxic conditions, after which P17 mouse eyeballs were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde and either microdissected to obtain retinal flat mounts or cryopreserved in OCT (IMEB, San Marcos, Calif). Fluorescent images of flat mounts stained with Alexa594-conjugated Griffonia simplicifolia isolectin B4 (isolectin GSL-1-B4; 1:100, Invitrogen) were analyzed with a Nikon inverted microscope (PhotoFit, TekMate, Anchorage, Alaska; ImageJ; n=8 mice per group). Interrupted 6-µm sections at 50-µm intervals were obtained for cryopreserved eyeballs and H&E stained. Mean capillary area of vessels either directly under or invading the retinal inner limiting membrane (ILM) were measured from digitized images obtained from 2 randomly selected interrupted eyeball sections (n=4 mice per group).
Unilateral Femoral Artery Ligation, Laser Doppler Perfusion Imaging, and Appearance and Use Score Assessments
Ligation, imaging, and use scores were performed as described previously.22,23 Appearance scores were based on the scale; 0=no change; 1 to 5=the number of discolored/lost nails; and 6 to 10=the number of discolored/lost digits (n=11 mice per group).
Atrophy and Capillary Density in Gastrocnemius Muscles
Twenty-one days after femoral artery ligation, gastrocnemius muscles were fixed and paraffin embedded as described previously.22 For each sample, 5 sections (50 µm apart) were obtained and stained with H&E or Massons trichrome or labeled with isolectin GSL-1-B4 (1:100). Three 20x images were collected for each condition from 2 randomly selected sections. Using ImageJ, muscle atrophy and capillary density were estimated as described previously (n=5–9 mice per group).22
Animal Regulations
All housing, breeding, and experimental procedures with mice were in accordance with national guidelines and regulations, and were approved by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Statistical Analysis
Continuous variables were compared with either the Students t test or nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test. We considered P<0.05 to be significant. For animal studies, male and female mice demonstrated no experimental differences; thus they were combined.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Proliferation of ECs is also fundamental to angiogenesis.6 Relative to control, MECs depleted of CIB1 by shRNA and cultured in either growth media or basal media supplemented with either bFGF or VEGF demonstrated modest yet significantly decreased 5-bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) incorporation (Figure 1C). No difference in proliferation between untransduced and control transduced MECs was observed (data not shown). Consistent with this, CIB1–/– MHECs and MLECs cultured in growth media also demonstrated a 61% and 35% decrease, respectively, in BrdUrd incorporation compared with WT ECs (Figure 1D). Direct cell counts of cultured CIB1-depleted MECs and CIB1–/– MHECs further confirmed a significant decrease in proliferation relative to controls (data not shown). Thus, in addition to migration, CIB1 is also necessary for normal rates of EC proliferation.
To determine whether loss of CIB1 affects other EC functions, we also assessed tubule formation on growth factor–reduced Matrigel. In the presence of growth media, CIB1-depleted MECs and CIB1–/– MHECs showed a 26% and 44% reduction in nascent tubule formation compared with their respective controls (Figure 1E and 1F). Treatment of CIB1-depleted MECs and CIB1–/– MHECs with bFGF or VEGF did not stimulate tubule formation to the same extent as control cells (Figure 1E and 1F). Hence, in addition to EC migration and proliferation, CIB1 appears to be required for efficient EC sprouting and invasion, events required for angiogenesis.
Loss of CIB1 in ECs Disrupts PAK1 and ERK1/2 Activation
We previously determined that CIB1 regulates PAK1 activation in fibroblasts and transformed epithelial cells.14 Naik and Naik also have reported that CIB1 can regulate FAK activation.13 Because several studies have underscored the importance of PAK1, FAK, and their downstream mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) effectors, ERK1/2 and p38, in EC angiogenic signaling,15,16,24 we asked whether loss of CIB1 affects the activation of these signaling molecules. Although FAK phosphorylation was not significantly altered in CIB1–/– ECs (data not shown), in vitro kinase assays revealed significantly less active PAK1 in CIB1–/– MLECs relative to control cells, 20 and 45 minutes following adhesion to fibronectin (Figure 2A). Decreased PAK1 activation was also observed in CIB1-depleted MECs (data not shown). Similarly, decreased ERK1/2 phosphorylation was observed in CIB1–/– MLECs, without changes in total ERK1/2 protein levels, 20 and 45 minutes following adhesion (Figure 2B). Control ECs also showed differences in the relative peak activation times of PAK1 and ERK1/2, suggesting the contribution of additional signaling pathways leading to ERK1/2 activation. However, despite these differences, we consistently found decreased activation of both PAK1 and ERK1/2 in CIB1–/– ECs. Importantly, no differences in protein kinase C and p38 MAPK phosphorylation were detected in WT and CIB1–/– MLECs following adhesion (Figure 2B and data not shown). Thus, these data demonstrate that loss of CIB1 can disrupt EC signaling, potentially via regulation of PAK1 and ERK1/2 activation in ECs.
|
Loss of CIB1 in ECs Decreases MMP-2 Expression
Numerous signaling cascades can be activated downstream of PAK1.25 Among them are MAPKs that are implicated in the production and activation of MMPs.26 Because loss of CIB1 in ECs resulted in decreased responsiveness to angiogenic growth factors and decreased PAK1 and ERK1/2 activation on adhesion to fibronectin, we asked whether MMP expression was also affected. Enzymatic activity of MMPs was assessed by gelatin zymography, which revealed increased lytic zones only at the molecular mass of MMP-2 (68 kDa) in the conditioned media of growth factor–treated WT MLECs but not CIB1–/– MLECs (Figure 2C). Western blotting also demonstrated less growth factor–induced MMP-2 expression in CIB1–/– MLEC conditioned media (Figure 2D), and decreased MMP-2 protein expression in lysates derived from CIB1–/– MHECs (Figure 2E). However, MMP-9 secretion was undetectable in WT and CIB1–/– ECs (data not shown). Furthermore, WT and CIB1–/– ECs showed no differences in the expression of the physiological inhibitor (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases [TIMP]-227) and activator of MMP-2, (MMP-14 [MT1-MMP]27) (data not shown).
CIB1 Deficiency Diminishes bFGF and VEGF-Induced Microvessel Growth
The decreased response to bFGF and VEGF and attenuated MMP-2 expression by CIB1–/– ECs led us to ask whether angiogenesis is decreased ex vivo, in cultured microsections of aortas and tibialis anterior muscles from CIB1–/– mice. CIB1–/– aortic rings and tibialis anterior muscles cultured for 8 days in growth media produced
50% fewer microvessels, relative to control (Figure 3A through 3C). In addition, CIB1–/– aortic rings also produced
60% fewer microvessels in response to bFGF and VEGF (Figure 3A and 3B). We further assessed growth factor–induced angiogenesis in vivo by implanting WT and CIB1–/– mice with Matrigel plugs impregnated with bFGF or VEGF. Microvessel infiltration into the plugs was reduced by
80% in CIB1–/– mice compared with WT littermates (Figure 3D and 3E). Thus, growth factor–induced angiogenesis is strongly inhibited in CIB1–/– mice.
|
CIB1 Deficiency Leads to Decreased Oxygen-Induced Retinal Angiogenesis
Mice lacking CIB1 develop and reach adult reproductive age normally.17 Therefore, not surprisingly, we observed that developmental retinal angiogenesis in CIB1–/– mice proceeds normally (supplemental Figure V). However, because CIB1 appeared to be a critical regulator of EC function and signaling, we hypothesized that CIB1–/– mice may still have a defect in pathological retinal angiogenesis. To test this, we examined CIB1–/– mice using an oxygen-induced retinal angiogenesis assay, wherein in vivo exposure to an elevated inspired oxygen concentration obliterates the central retinal capillaries, leading to hypoxia in the mouse neonatal retina. Subsequent return to normoxia induces exuberant angiogenesis, resulting in formation of aberrant capillary neovessel buds that can be visualized in isolectin GSL-1-B4–stained retinal flat mounts.20,28
Well-defined buds were detected in WT P17 flat mounted retinas. In CIB1–/– retinas, fewer and less clearly defined buds were evident (Figure 4A and 4B). Because these buds are composed of clusters of tortuous vessels that protrude through the retinal ILM,29 retinal cross-sections were obtained to assess the size and morphology of these neovessels. WT retinal cross-sections displayed large protruding microvessels that occasionally ruptured through the ILM, whereas CIB1–/– retinal cross-sections showed blood vessels directly under the ILM that were smaller in size and did not protrude through as frequently (Figure 4C and 4D). In CIB1–/– retinas, the ILM was also almost always intact (Figure 4C). Therefore, these data provide the first evidence demonstrating that CIB1–/– mice have impaired pathological angiogenesis in response to ischemia.
|
CIB1 Deficiency Delays Postischemic Recovery and Neovascularization
A common mouse model for peripheral vascular disease is experimentally induced hindlimb ischemia through unilateral femoral artery ligation.22 In this model, blood flow to the hindlimb is effectively eliminated, which rapidly induces ischemia and postischemic recovery mechanisms (ie, adaptive angiogenesis and arteriogenesis).30 To extend our observations from the oxygen-induced retinal angiogenesis assay, we performed this assay to determine whether CIB1 also plays a role in adaptive ischemia-induced angiogenesis.
Noninvasive, laser-scanning Doppler velocimetry22 demonstrated that by 14 days postfemoral artery ligation, 90% of hindpaw plantar region perfusion was restored in WT mice but only 60% in CIB1–/– mice (Figure 5A and 5B). Furthermore, ischemic tissue injury was more severe in CIB1–/– mice, as assessed by appearance and use scores.23 Incidence of nail and toe discoloration, toe loss, hindpaw cyanosis, as well as impaired hindlimb function were several fold higher in CIB1–/– mice relative to WT littermates (Figure 5C and 5D). Similarly, increased atrophy and fibrosis were observed in the gastrocnemius muscles of CIB1–/– hindlimbs, which are known to experience substantial ischemia immediately after femoral artery ligation (Figure 6A).22 Average muscle fiber size in CIB1–/– ischemic gastrocnemius muscles was reduced by 23%, compared with only 6% in WT muscles (Figure 6B), indicating that CIB1–/– tissue experiences more profound tissue damage after ischemia.
|
|
Interestingly, tissue homogenates of CIB1–/– ischemic gastrocnemius muscles, isolated 4 days after femoral artery ligation showed a significant decrease in PAK1 activation and ERK1/2 phosphorylation (Figure 6C). ERK1/2 phosphorylation in CIB1–/– nonischemic gastrocnemius muscle tissue was also significantly reduced. However, no consistent differences were detected in p38 phosphorylation and MMP-2 expression between WT and CIB1–/– ischemic and nonischemic gastrocnemius muscles (Figure 6C). Thus, these data correlate with our findings in vitro and demonstrate that CIB1–/– mice have a specific defect in PAK1 and ERK1/2 signaling, which likely contributes to the decrease in recovery in CIB1–/– ischemic tissue.
Attenuated PAK1 activation may also lead to decreased angiogenesis, which could also explain the observed increase in tissue damage in CIB1–/– mice following femoral artery ligation.24 To test this, we determined capillary densities in gastrocnemius muscles 21 days after femoral artery ligation in WT and CIB1–/– mice. Isolectin GSL-1-B4 staining revealed an increase in capillary density only in WT ischemic gastrocnemius muscles (Figure 6D and 6E), thus providing further evidence of reduced ischemia-induced angiogenesis in CIB1–/– mice. Because postmortem x-ray angiography revealed unaltered arteriogenesis in CIB1–/– mice (unpublished data, 2007), this defect in ischemia-induced angiogenesis appears to be specific.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recent evidence suggests that CIB1 contributes to important intracellular signaling mechanisms. For example, we previously demonstrated that CIB1 binds to and activates PAK1 in different cell types and that CIB1 depletion results in decreased PAK1 activation on adhesion to fibronectin.14 Furthermore, we previously observed a Cdc42-dependent upregulation of PAK1 activity in CIB1-depeletd rat embryo fibroblasts with extended adhesion to fibronectin.14 In agreement with this, we also observed significantly reduced adhesion-induced PAK1 activation in CIB1–/– ECs. However, we did not detect a similar rebound of PAK1 activation with prolonged adhesion to fibronectin (up to 180 minutes) in CIB1–/– ECs, suggesting that this mechanism is either not as profound in ECs or occurs at later time points. More importantly, we found that PAK1 activation in vivo is dramatically reduced in CIB1–/– ischemic gastrocnemius muscle tissue homogenates. To our knowledge, this finding provides the first evidence demonstrating CIB1-dependent PAK1 activation in vivo and also suggests a role for PAK1 in ischemia-induced angiogenesis. Thus, these results reveal a functional interaction between CIB1 and PAK1 in multiple cell types and tissues.
Moreover, we previously demonstrated that CIB1 depletion increases fibroblast and epithelial cell migration.14 However, the present study demonstrates the opposite result, in which CIB1-depleted and CIB1–/– ECs exhibited decreased migration. These apparent differences may be attributable to a number of factors such as differences in cell types, activated signaling mechanisms, and/or experimental conditions. For example, the CIB1-binding partner PAK1 has been shown to both increase and decrease migration through different signaling pathways.25 In addition, experimental conditions used in this study were different than what was described previously (haptotactic migration in this study was toward 25 µg/mL fibronectin versus 5 µg/mL fibronectin14), which may significantly affect the migratory response.31
Previous reports also demonstrate that VEGF and bFGF can rapidly induce PAK activation,24 which in turn can phosphorylate and activate MEK132 and the MAPKs ERK1/233 and p38.34 Here we demonstrate that both PAK1 and ERK1/2 activation were significantly decreased in CIB1–/– ECs and CIB1–/– mouse nonischemic and ischemic gastrocnemius muscles. These defects appear to be specific because no profound differences were detected in the activation state of other kinases such as FAK, protein kinase C, and p38 MAPK. Moreover, the loss of CIB1 in part mimics the angiogenic defects observed when ERK1/2 is pharmacologically inhibited in vivo.35 Thus, it is likely that attenuated PAK1 and ERK1/2 activation contributes to the decrease in CIB1–/– ECs growth factor–induced functions, as well as microvessel formation in ex vivo CIB1–/– organ cultures and in vivo Matrigel plugs.
Additionally, ERK1/2 activation is necessary for transcriptional upregulation of MMPs,26 which are key modulators of pathophysiological events.27 Constitutively expressed by various cell types (including ECs), MMP-2 is known to contribute to pathological angiogenesis, including ischemia-induced retinal angiogenesis.36 Its contributions to angiogenesis are mediated by extracellular matrix degradation and proteolytic activation of other MMPs, such as proMMP-9, which is also essential in ischemia-induced angiogenesis.27 Accordingly, genetic deletion of MMP-2 and MMP-9 significantly reduces postnatal ischemia-induced angiogenesis.37,38 Here we report a similar phenotype in CIB1–/– mice and that CIB1–/– ECs generate less MMP-2. Thus, it is most likely that the defect in MMP-2 expression and secretion contributes to the blunted angiogenic response observed in CIB1–/– ischemic retinas and hindlimb gastrocnemius muscles.
Although CIB1–/– mice exhibit impaired ischemia-induced angiogenesis, they undergo normal developmental and physiological angiogenesis (developing retinal vasculature and female reproduction are normal). Although CIB1 homologs such as CIB2, CIB3, and CIB4 might compensate for the loss of CIB1, it is more likely that CIB1 is a member of a growing group of genes that contributes to pathological angiogenesis during ischemia, inflammation, and tumor growth but not embryonic vasculogenesis and developmental angiogenesis.39 Prominent examples of these include knockout mice for bFGF,40 intercellular adhesion molecule 2,18 prostaglandin E2 receptor,41 and integrins ß3 and ß5.20
Collectively, our study identifies a previously uncharacterized role for CIB1 in the vasculature and for the first time demonstrates that it has a role in angiogenesis in vivo. Our study also demonstrates that CIB1 is critical in ischemia-induced pathological angiogenesis in the retina, as well as ischemia-induced adaptive angiogenesis in the hindlimb. However, CIB1 is not essential for developmental angiogenesis. Therefore, our studies identify CIB1 as a novel target for both pro- and antiangiogenic therapy.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by NIH grants 2-P01-HL45100 (to L.V.P.), HL-62584 (to J.E.F.), R01 EY15130 (to M.E.H.), and T32-HL-069768 (to M.A.Z.).
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |