Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation Research
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation Research. 2007;100:425-433
Published online before print January 18, 2007, doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000258428.09589.1a
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/3/425    most recent
01.RES.0000258428.09589.1av1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cardin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nattel, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cardin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nattel, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Arrythmias-basic studies
Right arrow Gene expression
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
(Circulation Research. 2007;100:425.)
© 2007 American Heart Association, Inc.


Integrative Physiology

Contrasting Gene Expression Profiles in Two Canine Models of Atrial Fibrillation

Sophie Cardin*, Eric Libby*, Patricia Pelletier, Sabrina Le Bouter, Akiko Shiroshita-Takeshita, Nolwenn Le Meur, Jean Léger, Sophie Demolombe, André Ponton, Leon Glass, Stanley Nattel

From the From Department of Medicine and Research Center (S.C., P.P., S.L.B., A.S.-T., S.N.), Montreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, Departments of Pharmacology (S.C., S.N.) and Physiology (E.L., L.G.), McGill University, Montreal, McGill University and Genome Quebec Innovation Centre (A.P.) and INSERM U533-Institut du Thorax (N.L.M., J.L., S.D.), Nantes, France.

Correspondence to Stanley Nattel, Montreal Heart Institute, 5000 Belanger St. E., Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 1C8. E-mail stanley.nattel{at}icm-mhi.org


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Gene-expression changes in atrial fibrillation patients reflect both underlying heart-disease substrates and changes because of atrial fibrillation-induced atrial-tachycardia remodeling. These are difficult to separate in clinical investigations. This study assessed time-dependent mRNA expression-changes in canine models of atrial-tachycardia remodeling and congestive heart failure. Five experimental groups (5 dogs/group) were submitted to atrial (ATP, 400 bpm x24 hours, 1 or 6 weeks) or ventricular (VTP, 240 bpm x24 hours or 2 weeks) tachypacing. The expression of {approx}21,700 transcripts was analyzed by microarray in isolated left-atrial cardiomyocytes and (for 18 genes) by real-time RT-PCR. Protein-expression changes were assessed by Western blot. In VTP, a large number of significant mRNA-expression changes occurred after both 24 hours (2209) and 2 weeks (2720). In ATP, fewer changes occurred at 24 hours (242) and fewer still (87) at 1 week, with no statistically-significant alterations at 6 weeks. Expression changes in VTP varied over time in complex ways. Extracellular matrix-related transcripts were strongly upregulated by VTP consistent with its pathophysiology, with 8 collagen-genes upregulated >10-fold, fibrillin-1 8-fold and MMP2 4.5-fold at 2 weeks (time of fibrosis) but unchanged at 24 hours. Other extracellular matrix genes (eg, fibronectin, lysine oxidase-like 2) increased at both time-points ({approx}10, {approx}5-fold respectively). In ATP, mRNA-changes almost exclusively represented downregulation and were quantitatively smaller. This study shows that VTP-induced congestive heart failure and ATP produce qualitatively different temporally-evolving patterns of gene-expression change, and that specific transcriptomal responses associated with atrial fibrillation versus underlying heart disease substrates must be considered in assessing gene-expression changes in man.


Key Words: arrhythmia • remodeling • genomic


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMaterials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac rhythm disorder, and with the aging of the population both the prevalence and economic impact of AF are increasing progressively.1 Although the mechanistic basis of AF remains incompletely understood, active research promises to provide new insights that may lead to improved therapeutic options.2,3

A variety of animal models have been used to assess AF pathophysiology under controlled conditions. Atrial tachyarrhythmias, including AF itself, alter atrial electrophysiology in ways that promote AF vulnerability.4–6 Experimentally-induced congestive heart failure (CHF) also creates a substrate for AF maintenance, but by quite different mechanisms.7 The atrial-tachycardia remodeling paradigm shows prominent changes in ion-channel function that lead to action-potential abbreviation and the promotion of atrial reentry.8,9 CHF-induced ionic-current changes do not promote reentry but may favor ectopic-impulse formation,10 and CHF-induced fibrosis promotes reentry by interfering with intraatrial conduction.7

The molecular basis of AF remains unclear. Gene microarray technology permits large-scale analysis of cardiac gene-expression changes, and has been applied to compare AF patients with those in sinus rhythm. Expression profiling has pointed to several AF-related gene-expression changes,11–15 including alterations associated with oxidative stress,11 a ventricular-like expression signature14 and changes in ion-transporters.15 A limitation of this type of clinical gene-expression study is that it is very difficult to differentiate between AF-promoting changes caused by AF and those resulting from underlying cardiac disease. The analysis is further complicated by systematic inter-group differences in drug therapy, atrial size, and other cardiac variables.

Animal models of AF allow for greater control over study conditions and permit observations of the time course of any alterations. A human DNA microarray containing 6,035 cDNA probes applied to a porcine model of AF pointed to changes in myosin light chain-2 expression.16 DNA microarrays with probes for canine-gene transcripts have recently become commercially-available. We designed the present study to analyze changes in canine cardiac gene-expression in 2 AF models: atrial-tachycardia remodeling induced by atrial tachypacing (ATP) and CHF-related remodeling produced by ventricular-tachypacing (VTP). Assessments were initially obtained at 2 time-points in each model: early after the onset of tachypacing (24 hours) and at a time of near steady-state remodeling (1 week for ATP,8 2 weeks for VTP17). After initial studies showed that AF duration increases were smaller in 1-week ATP dogs versus 2-week VTP dogs, we added another group subjected to 6-week ATP.


*    Materials and Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Materials and Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Because of manuscript-length limitations, we summarize only key methods in this section. Detailed methods are provided in the online data supplement available at http://circres.ahajournals.org

Animal Model
These methods followed previous publications.6,7,10,18,19 Experiments were performed in male mongrel dogs weighing 25 to 32 kg. In the initial series of experiments, 5 groups (n=5/group) were studied. Two groups were subjected to VTP, for 24 hours or 2 weeks. A unipolar ventricular-pacing lead was inserted into the right-ventricular apex under 1.5%-halothane anesthesia and attached to a pacemaker in the neck programmed to 240 bpm. Two other groups were subjected to ATP, for 24 hours or 1 week. These dogs were instrumented with a unipolar right-atrial (RA) lead attached to a pacemaker that captured the atrium at 400 bpm and a ventricular-pacing lead attached to a demand-pacemaker programmed to 80 bpm. Complete AV-block was induced by radiofrequency-ablation. A final group of VTP-sham control animals was handled identically to 24-hour VTP-dogs, but their pacemaker was not activated.

A second series of concurrent experiments was performed in 3 additional groups of dogs (n=5/group): because 1-week ATP proved not to promote AF as much as 2-week VTP, we added a 6-week ATP group, and to test for potential intervention-related differences we concurrently studied VTP and ATP shams. The VTP-shams were prepared as described above. The ATP-shams were prepared and handled identically to the 24-hour ATP-dogs, but their atrial pacemakers were not activated. VTP-shams were included in both experimental series because they were the primary control group for all analyses. For biochemical analyses in each series, experimental and sham animals were handled concurrently, with DNA extraction and microarray processing performed on the same days with the same reagents and on the same batches of microarrays to minimize variability. After preparation periods, dogs were anesthetized (morphine, 2 mg/kg s.c.; {alpha}-chloralose, 120 mg/kg i.v. load; 29.25 mg/kg/hr maintenance infusion) and ventilated. In vivo measurements were obtained and an isolated-cardiomyocyte preparation was snap-frozen for subsequent analysis.

In Vivo Measurements and Cell Isolation
A median sternotomy was performed and Teflon-coated stainless steel electrodes were hooked into the RA appendage (RAA) for electrophysiological measurements. RAA effective refractory period (AERP) was measured at various basic cycle lengths (BCLs). Mean AF duration (DAF) was measured in each dog with multiple AF inductions as previously described.6–8 Left-ventricular end-diastolic pressure was measured at the end of each experiment. Animals were euthanized, hearts removed and placed in Tyrode solution equilibrated with 100% O2 for dissection. The left atrium (LA) was perfused via the left circumflex coronary artery and cell-isolation performed via collagenase digestion.18,19 Electrophysiological measurements were obtained in the RAA and cell isolation/biochemical analysis performed with LA tissue because in our previous experience tissue trauma caused by atrial manipulation for electrophysiological measurement can affect biochemical determinations.

Canine Genome Microarrays
The microarrays we used (Affymetrix GeneChip Canine Genome Array) are high-density oligonucleotide arrays (11-µm spots) containing 23,836 25-mer probe-sets detecting 21,700 transcripts. For details, see the online data supplement available at http://circres.ahajournals.org.

RNA Extraction, Quantification, and Processing on Arrays
RNA was extracted into chloroform from Trizol-immersed cell pellets (for details, see online data supplement). RNA was quantified and assessed for purity by measuring optical density at 260 nm and 280 nm. The quality was also verified by running samples on 2.5% agarose gels. Samples with OD ratio 260/280 nm >1.8 were selected for microarray processing.

For processing on microarrays, 10 µg of total RNA was used. The target cRNA derived from each sample was verified for quality on Agilent RNA 6000 nano-chips and fragmented cRNA was hybridized to the microarray. The chips were stained and washed with the GeneChip Fluidics Station 450 and visualized on an Affymetrix GeneChip Scanner 3000.

Statistical Analysis of Microarray Data
The microarray expression data were analyzed using a combination of algorithms. We first applied the invariant set normalization method20 in dChip, which corrects for interarray differences in brightness. To integrate each gene’s probe intensities into one value representative of gene-expression, we used dChip to calculate the model based expression index.21 dChip was set to use only the intensities of the perfect match probes as well as detect single, probe, and array outliers. After formulating the gene-expression values, we used significance analysis for microarrays (SAM)22 to detect differentially-expressed genes, accepting only genes with a q-value <1.

For genes without Affymetrix annotations, we used BLAST to find mammalian-sequence homologies with an E-value <10–4. To enhance the annotations with functional information, we used Affymetrix’s human to canine microarray comparisons to map canine genes to their human equivalents. With the human equivalents, we queried the Gene Ontology (GO) database for functional information. Genes not identified by this process were classified by literature search.

Western-Blot Analysis
The expression of selected genes was verified at the protein level by Western blot. Protein was extracted from isolated-cardiomyocyte pellets. Equal amounts of protein (100 µg/sample) were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred and then blotted with antibodies listed in supplemental Table I. Bands were quantified and expressed as a ratio over the corresponding VTP-sham sample in the same gel, relative to GAPDH band-intensity on the same samples.

Real-Time RT-PCR
Microarray-based expression ratios were confirmed with real-time RT-PCR for 18 selected genes. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 2 µg of total RNA. Online PCR was performed with FAM-labeled fluorogenic TaqMan probes and primers. The fluorescence signals were normalized to results with 18S-ribosomal RNA and analyzed with the comparative-threshold cycle (Ct) method. Each gene was quantified in duplicate for each sample. Forward and reverse primers and TaqMan probe-sequences are provided in supplemental Table II.

Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as means±SEM. Comparisons among group means (Tables 1 and 2Down and supplemental Tables V and VI) were performed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s test for individual-mean comparisons relative to control (VTP-sham). A two-tailed P<0.05 was considered statistically-significant.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Hemodynamic and Electrophysiological Changes in First Series of Dogs


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Hemodynamics and Electrophysiology
Consistent with previous studies,7,10 VTP-dogs showed increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and no significant AERP changes (Table 1). ATP-dogs were hemodynamically similar to sham controls, but as in previous work4–6 showed substantial AERP decreases and loss of rate-adaptation at 1 week (Table 1). AF duration (DAF) increased progressively in both models, with changes reaching statistical significance at 2 weeks in VTP-dogs (Table 1) and at 6 weeks in ATP-dogs (Table 2). Although the ATP-induced AERP changes (decreased AERP and loss of AERP rate-adaptation) reached a maximum at 1 week (Table 1) and did not progress further at 6 weeks (Table 2), AF duration continued to increase between 1 and 6 weeks and statistically significant increases relative to baseline were achieved only at 6 weeks. There were no statistically-significant differences between ATP-shams and VTP-shams (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Hemodynamic and Electrophysiological Changes in Second Series of Dogs

Microarray Findings
Figure 1 shows all mRNA-expression levels in the initial series of dogs, with the mean value for each transcript probe-set plotted against mean VTP-sham expression. Values indicated by blue points are not significantly different from sham-values, whereas red points indicate statistically-significant changes. In ATP-dogs, 242 probe-sets showed significant changes at 24 hours and 87 at 1 week. VTP-dogs showed significant changes for 2209 probe-sets at 24 hours and 2720 at 2 weeks. Corresponding results for the second series of dogs are shown in Figure 2. No statistically-significant gene-expression differences were observed between 6-week ATP-dogs and VTP-shams, nor between ATP-shams and VTP-shams. A full listing of relative expression values for all ATP and VTP groups are provided for each transcript probe-set with statistically-significant changes in supplemental Table III. Almost all (94%) of the significantly-changed genes in ATP-dogs lie below the black line of identity and are therefore under-expressed. For VTP-dogs, large numbers of genes lie on either side of the line of identity (53% underexpressed; 47% overexpressed).


Figure 1
View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 1. Overall changes in mRNA expression compared with sham in 24-hour ATP (A), 1-week ATP (B), 24-hour VTP (C) and 2-week VTP (D) samples. The absolute expression, in loge(L), where L=mean sample-luminescence, for each intervention-group transcript probe-set is plotted as a function of the corresponding value for the VTP-sham group and represented as a single point. Blue points are not significantly different from sham; red points are significantly different. If no changes in mRNA-expression occurred, all points would fall on the black line of identity.


Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 2. Overall mRNA-expression comparisons between (A) 6-week ATP vs VTP-sham (B), ATP-sham vs VTP-sham. Format as in Figure 1.

Of the differentially-expressed genes in ATP-dogs, 55 of the downregulated and none of the upregulated values were common to both 24-hour and 1-week time-points. These 55 downregulated values make up more than 72% of the downregulated results at 1-week ATP- thus, most of the differentially-expressed genes at 1 week are also downregulated at 24 hours. The ATP-pattern indicates a stronger early response, with decreasing numbers of significantly-altered genes over time. Unlike ATP, the VTP model had 25% more significantly-altered expression values at the later time-point. There are 336 upregulated and 567 downregulated transcript probe-sets common to both time-points, constituting 41% and 33% of the significantly-altered 24-hour and 2-week values respectively. Thus, more than half of the genes differentially-expressed in VTP at each time point are unique to that time point. For the transcript probe-sets common to both time points, a statistically-significant fraction (61%) was less altered at the 2-week time point.

Figure 3 shows the functional categories of genes that are significantly up- and downregulated in ATP and VTP-dogs. In ATP-dogs, the categories with the most genes altered are DNA/RNA synthesis/degradation and signal transduction. Almost all significantly-changed genes were downregulated. For all but the ribosomal-gene category, more genes were changed at 24 hours (black bars) than 1 week (white bars). The gray bars, representing genes changed at both 24 hours and one week, show that for most groups all genes changed at 1 week were also significantly altered at 24 hours. Several gene-categories (apoptosis, extracellular matrix (ECM), and transport) have no representation at 1 week. In contrast, for VTP-dogs most of the functional groups show unique 24-hour and 2-week responses, with overlap representing less than half the total response. Approximately as many values in each group represent upregulation as downregulation.


Figure 3
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 3. Number of transcript probe-sets in each functional group which was significantly down- or upregulated by atrial-tachycardia remodeling (left) or ventricular-tachycardia remodeling (right). "Overlap" refers to the number of values that were significantly affected in the same direction at both 24 hours and 1 week.

To evaluate whether gene-groups respond uniformly to each intervention or whether specific gene-groups change differentially, we calculated the percentage-change relative to sham in each dog for each significantly-altered transcript probe-set and ranked all changes from largest to smallest, with 1 being the most-changed gene and the highest rank-number the least-changed gene. We then plotted for each gene-group the fraction of its ranks that fell within each cohort of genes as ranks increased by integer from 1 (the most changed expression-value) to the least-changed value. To assess statistical significance, we calculated the sum of ranks for each functional gene-group and then randomly reassigned expression ratios to groups. For each permutation, we calculated the sum of ranks for the random groups and compared them to the originals. This process was repeated 100,000 times, and those gene-groups whose sum of ranks were lower/higher than the random groups more than 97.5% of the time (2-tailed P<0.05) were considered to have significantly larger/smaller expression-changes compared with overall behavior. Results following average behavior are shown by black lines; groups deviating significantly from average are shown by blue or red lines for larger or smaller changes respectively (Figure 4). For 24-hour VTP-dogs (Figure 4A), genes associated with metabolism, ECM, and cell structure/mobility showed the largest changes. At 2-week VTP (Figure 4B), the same functional categories show larger-than-average changes, along with immunity/coagulation genes. At both time points, ribosome-associated genes showed smaller-than-average changes, but DNA/RNA synthesis/degradation genes only deviated from average at 2 weeks. The analyses are less clear for ATP-dogs (supplemental Figure I), because of the much smaller number of significantly-changed genes. At 24 hours, immunity/coagulation and metabolism genes occupy significantly higher ranks than other groups, whereas at 1 week no groups deviate significantly from average responses. Supplemental Table IV shows detailed values and distribution properties from these analyses.


Figure 4
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 4. Cumulative fraction of ranks for each of the functional gene groups in VTP-dogs (for discussion of method, see text). Functional group curves in blue showed expression-ranks significantly greater than that of overall genome indicating larger-than-average changes; functional groups in red showed expression-ranks that were significantly less, indicating smaller-than-average changes.

Real-Time RT-PCR Results
Figure 5 compares the expression levels of selected genes as determined by microarray and real-time RT-PCR methods in the first series of dogs. The genes were selected to include genes believed to be of pathophysiological significance, as well as genes with overexpression, underexpression and no apparent expression change. Overall, there was a strong linear correlation between results with the 2 methods (R2=0.96). Because most of the values were concentrated within the 0 to 5-fold change range, this section of the graph is expanded at the left for better resolution. Detailed results are presented in supplemental Table V. There is generally close agreement between the independent determinations of mRNA expression by the 2 methods. Of 36 sample-sets showing statistically-significant changes by microarray, 22 (61%) show statistically-significant changes of the same order and direction by RT-PCR. For the 14 sample-sets with significant changes by microarray and nonsignificant changes by RT-PCR, 11 (79%) show changes of the same direction and order with both methods.


Figure 5
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 5. Correlation between expression changes by real-time PCR vs microarray. Regression lines are shown.

Western-Blot Results
Figure 6 shows typical blots for the 9 gene products selected for Western-blot analysis. Supplemental Table VI presents the mean results of Western-blot analyses, along with the corresponding results from microarray analysis. Statistical congruence was observed for 28 of 36 sample sets: 24 sample-sets (shown in green in supplemental Table VI) did not change significantly by either gene-chip or Western blot, and 4 sample-sets (shown in yellow in supplemental Table VI) changed significantly in the same direction. For 5 of the remaining 8 sample-sets (pink in supplemental Table VI), changes were statistically significant for only 1 of gene-chip or Western blot, but were in the same quantitative direction. For 3 sample-sets (cathepsin L in 2-week VTP and cathepsin S in 24-hour and 2-week VTP dogs), statistically-significant increases or decreases of the order of 30% to 50% were seen in one measurement and either directionally-discrepant or no change was observed with the other. There was thus good general agreement between changes in protein expression and changes in mRNA-expression, although some quantitative differences were clearly present (eg, for collagen-III, KChIP2 and IL1-RA).


Figure 6
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Figure 6. Examples of Western blots for 9 proteins studied to compare protein versus mRNA expression changes.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
We have analyzed changes in canine atrial mRNA expression induced by atrial-tachycardia remodeling and ventricular-tachypacing induced heart failure over time. The results highlight major differences in the molecular basis of these 2 atrial arrhythmogenic-remodeling paradigms and indicate important time-dependent evolution of gene-expression changes.

Relationship to Previous Findings Regarding Gene-Expression Profiles in AF
Several gene-microarray studies have been performed in AF patients. Kim et al found upregulation of pro-oxidant and downregulation of antioxidant genes.11 Investigators subsequently found 33 genes with >50% upregulation and 63 with >50% downregulation,12,13 with changes in genes related to cell signaling, inflammation, oxidation and cellular respiration.13 Barth et al found that the human atrial transcriptome changed to a ventricular-like pattern in AF-patients.14 One limitation of these studies was the difference in heart disease between AF-patients (valve disease, often with cardiac hypertrophy, dilation and/or dysfunction) compared with sinus-rhythm controls (coronary-artery disease with well-preserved ventricular function). It is therefore difficult to separate changes because of AF from underlying disease-related remodeling. We recently analyzed AF-related transcriptome remodeling in heart-disease matched patients with AF versus sinus rhythm.15,23 Most gene-expression changes were attributable to underlying heart disease: {approx}2/3 of ion-channel gene-changes15 and >90% in the complete transcriptome23 occurred in both sinus-rhythm and AF patients.

Much less information is available from animal models of AF. Changes in cellular structure, metabolism, gene-expression regulation and differentiation genes were observed in a goat model.24 In a porcine atrial-tachypacing model, 387 genes were altered.16 In neither model was ventricular-rate controlled, so a contribution of tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy cannot be excluded.

Here, we used canine-specific microarrays to study changes with {approx}21,000 transcript probe-sets over time in ATP and VTP-dogs. Our results show striking differences in the quantity, magnitude and types of gene-expression changes induced by the 2 interventions. Whereas atrial-tachypaced dogs primarily showed decreasing numbers of transcript-expression changes over time, VTP-dogs displayed complex temporal evolution with some transcripts becoming less affected over time and others more affected. Particularly striking were changes in ECM-gene expression, with relatively small changes in most genes at 24 hours and very large changes at 2 weeks (eg, 8 collagen-genes upregulated >10-fold, fibrillin-1 8-fold and MMP2 4.5-fold; supplemental Table III). However, fibronectin was >10-fold and lysine oxidase-like (LOXL)-2 was {approx}5-fold upregulated at both 24-hour and 2-week time-points. ECM genes were virtually unchanged in ATP-dogs, with small ({approx}20% to 30%) decreases in 3 collagen genes at 24 hours and no significant ECM-gene changes thereafter.

Relevance to Mechanisms of AF-Related Remodeling
Ventricular tachypacing-induced CHF produces structural and ionic remodeling resembling the substrate for chronic AF in man.3,7,10 Our results provide extensive new information about the nature and number of atrial gene-systems affected over time during the evolution of CHF. The prominence of changes in ECM genes, particularly those associated with collagen production, is consistent with the fibrosis that appears central to arrhythmogenesis.25,26 Collagen-associated mRNA expression is dramatically increased at 2-week VTP, when fibrosis approaches maximum, and is much less affected at 24 hours, when fibrosis has not yet appeared.17 Early-phase reactive ECM genes, such as {alpha}1-antitrypsin and fibronectin (activity increased {approx}5 and {approx}10-fold at 24-hour VTP), may be involved in early changes leading to fibrosis. Altered regulation of genes involved in metabolism and cellular contraction are consistent with energy-saving adaptations.

To pursue the gene-response analysis, we considered genes whose protein-products interact with TGFß, in view of evidence for a potentially-important role of TGFß in AF-related fibrotic remodeling.27,28 We identified all proteins in the Human Protein Reference Database that interact with TGFß or a TGFß-interacting protein. For 383 proteins identified, we used BLAST to find corresponding probe-sets on our microarray. Of 214 genes whose expression could be measured, 85 were differentially expressed in VTP-dogs (supplemental Figure II). Interestingly, connective-tissue growth factor (CTGF) gene-expression was enhanced by 24-hour VTP. CTGF is upregulated by angiotensin 2,29 TGFß1,30 or alterations in the cytoskeleton.31 CTGF promotes fibrosis in pathological conditions by blocking a negative TGFß-feedback loop mediated by Smad 7 signaling, allowing continued TGFß-related activation.32 The addition of CTGF to primary mesangial cells induces fibronectin production, cell migration, and cytoskeletal rearrangement.33 Fibronectin expression is enhanced by 24-hour VTP and fibronectin interacts with a wide range of TGFß-related products of genes altered in VTP (supplemental Figure II). Thus, CTGF is an interesting potential candidate for a significant role in VTP-related remodeling. Further exploration of this and other networks identified by the rich genomic data obtained in the present work is indicated, but goes beyond the scope of this study. The very large number of genes affected by VTP points out the potential pitfalls in assessing a small number of selected genes without understanding the gene-response background against which such changes occur.

In contrast to VTP-remodeling, ATP-remodeling is associated with preserved tissue architecture and a predominance of ionic remodeling.7–9 The virtual absence of ECM-gene changes in the ATP data set is consistent with this structurally-benign remodeling. We observed relatively limited changes in ion-channel genes, despite the importance of ion-channel alterations in ATP-induced AF promotion.3,8,9 This may reflect important post-transcriptional mechanisms,34,35 but likely also reflects relatively low-level expression of ion-channel genes that makes it difficult to differentiate ion-channel gene-expression changes from background noise in a pan-genomic microarray. To assess ion-channel subunit mRNA changes accurately requires specialized microarrays15 that are presently unavailable for the dog. The decreasing number of gene-expression changes that occurred over time with ATP-remodeling suggests a time-related reduction in the stimuli for gene-expression change, consistent with atrial adaptation to the stress of ATP.

Potential Significance
Clinical gene-microarray studies in AF are limited by a range of factors (eg, underlying cardiac disease, drug therapy, duration of AF, etc) varying within the population. Animal models permit the assessment of transcriptomal changes under controlled duration and nature of atrial-remodeling stimuli. The present study is the first assessment of mRNA-expression remodeling in animal AF models to use species-specific microarrays. In addition, it is the first to compare atrial-transcriptome remodeling because of atrial tachycardia per se with remodeling caused by an AF-promoting cardiac condition (CHF) and the first to study the evolution of gene-changes over time. Our results illustrate the importance of considering underlying disease-related gene-expression changes in AF populations. They also clearly contrast the relatively modest mRNA-expression changes caused by atrial tachycardia with the extensive alterations induced by CHF.

Potential Limitations
We selected analysis time-points based on evidence that early-phase VTP-induced atrial changes peak at 24 hours,17,27 important atrial electrophysiological remodeling occurs with ATP at 1 week8,31 and with VTP at 2 weeks.17,27 Time-points additional to the ones we used might be interesting to examine. We do not know whether cardiac mRNA-level alterations were because of changes in synthesis or degradation. The studies necessary to resolve this question are not presently feasible at the scale that would be needed for the large number of genes we studied. We used an isolated-cardiomyocyte preparation for which we previously found very little contamination by other cell-types, but we cannot totally exclude contributions from noncardiomyocyte cell populations. Atrial remodeling could affect the expression of controls (GAPDH, 18-S rRNA respectively) for immunoblots and RT-PCR analyses; however, this proved not to be the case (supplemental Table VII).


*    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Chantal Maltais, Nathalie L’Heureux, and Chantal St-Cyr for technical help and France Thériault for secretarial support.

Sources of Funding

Supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Quebec Heart and Stroke Foundation, and the MITACS Network of Centers of Excellence. S.C. received a Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (HSFC) studentship and Sabrina Le Bouter FRSQ-INSERM and HSFC fellowships

Disclosures

None.


*    Footnotes
 
This manuscript was sent to Michael R. Rosen, for review by expert referees, editiorial decision, and final disposition.

*Both S.C. and E.L. contributed equally to this study and should be considered to share first authorship. Back

Original received December 21, 2005; resubmission received July 21, 2006; revised resubmission received December 14, 2006; accepted January 9, 2007.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMaterials and Methods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Steinberg JS. Atrial fibrillation: an emerging epidemic? Heart. 2004; 90: 239–240.[Free Full Text]

2. Allessie MA, Boyden PA, Camm AJ, Kleber AG, Lab MJ, Legato MJ, Rosen MR, Schwartz PJ, Spooner PM, Van Wagoner DR, Waldo AL. Pathophysiology and prevention of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2001; 103: 769–777.[Free Full Text]

3. Nattel S. New ideas about atrial fibrillation 50 years on. Nature. 2002; 415: 219–226.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

4. Wijffels MC, Kirchhof CJ, Dorland R, Allessie MA. Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation. A study in awake chronically instrumented goats. Circulation. 1995; 92: 1954–1968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Elvan A, Wylie K, Zipes DP. Pacing-induced chronic atrial fibrillation impairs sinus node function in dogs. Electrophysiological remodeling. Circulation. 1996; 94: 2953–2960.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Gaspo R, Bosch RF, Talajic M, Nattel S. Functional mechanisms underlying tachycardia-induced sustained atrial fibrillation in a chronic dog model. Circulation. 1997; 96: 4027–4035.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Li D, Fareh S, Leung TK, Nattel S. Promotion of atrial fibrillation by heart failure in dogs: atrial remodeling of a different sort. Circulation. 1999; 100: 87–95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Yue L, Feng J, Gaspo R, Li GR, Wang Z, Nattel S. Ionic remodeling underlying action potential changes in a canine model of atrial fibrillation. Circ Res. 1997; 81: 512–525.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Dobrev D, Ravens U. Remodeling of cardiomyocyte ion channels in human atrial fibrillation. Basic Res Cardiol. 2003; 98: 137–148.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

10. Li D, Melnyk P, Feng J, Wang Z, Petrecca K, Shrier A, Nattel S. Effects of experimental heart failure on atrial cellular and ionic electrophysiology. Circulation. 2000; 101: 2631–2638.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Kim YH, Lim do S, Lee JH, Shim WJ, Ro YM, Park GH, Becker KG, Cho-Chung YS, Kim MK. Gene expression profiling of oxidative stress on atrial fibrillation in humans. Exp Mol Med. 2003; 35: 336–349.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. Ohki-Kaneda R, Ohashi J, Yamamoto K, Ueno S, Ota J, Choi YL, Koinuma K, Yamashita Y, Misawa Y, Fuse K, Ikeda U, Shimada K, Mano H. Cardiac function-related gene expression profiles in human atrial myocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004; 320: 1328–1336.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

13. Ohki R, Yamamoto K, Ueno S, Mano H, Misawa Y, Fuse K, Ikeda U, Shimada K. Gene expression profiling of human atrial myocardium with atrial fibrillation by DNA microarray analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2005; 102: 233–238.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Barth AS, Merk S, Arnoldi E, Zwermann L, Kloos P, Gebauer M, Steinmeyer K, Bleich M, Kaab S, Hinterseer M, Kartmann H, Kreuzer E, Dugas M, Steinbeck G, Nabauer M. Reprogramming of the human atrial transcriptome in permanent atrial fibrillation: expression of a ventricular-like genomic signature. Circ Res. 2005; 96: 1022–1029.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Gaborit N, Steenman M, Lamirault G, Le Meur N, Le Bouter S, Lande G, Léger J, Charpentier F, Christ T, Dobrev D, Escande D, Nattel S, Demolombe S. Human atrial ion channel and transporter subunit gene-expression remodeling associated with valvular heart disease and atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2005; 112: 471–481.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Lai LP, Lin JL, Lin CS, Yeh HM, Tsay YG, Lee CF, Lee HH, Chang ZF, Hwang JJ, Su MJ, Tseng YZ, Huang SK. Functional genomic study on atrial fibrillation using cDNA microarray and two-dimensional protein electrophoresis techniques and identification of the myosin regulatory light chain isoform reprogramming in atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004; 15: 214–223.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

17. Cardin S, Li D, Thorin-Trescases N, Leung TK, Thorin E, Nattel S. Evolution of the atrial fibrillation substrate in experimental congestive heart failure: angiotensin-dependent and -independent pathways. Cardiovasc Res. 2003; 60: 315–325.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Yue L, Feng J, Li GR, Nattel S. Transient outward and delayed rectifier currents in canine atrium: properties and role of isolation methods. Am J Physiol. 1996; 270: H2157–H2168.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Li D, Zhang L, Kneller J, Nattel S. Potential ionic mechanism for repolarization differences between canine right and left atrium. Circ Res. 2001; 88: 1168–1175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Li C, Wong WH. Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: model validation, design issues and standard error application. Genome Biol. 2001; 2: 0032.1–0032.11.

21. Li C, Wong WH. Model-based analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: expression index computation and outlier detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98: 31–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98: 5116–5121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Lamirault G, Gaborit N, Le Meur N, Chevalier C, Lande G, Demolombe S, Escande D, Nattel S, Léger JJ, Steenman M. Gene expression profile changes associated with chronic atrial fibrillation and underlying valvular heart disease in man. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2006; 40: 173–184.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Thijssen VL, van der Velden HM, van Ankeren EP, Ausma J, Allessie MA, Borgers M, van Eys GJ, Jongsma HJ. Analysis of altered gene expression during sustained atrial fibrillation in the goat. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 54: 427–437.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Shinagawa K, Shi Y-F, Tardif JC, Leung T-K, Nattel S. Dynamic nature of atrial fibrillation substrate during development and reversal of heart failure in dogs. Circulation. 2002; 105: 2672–2678.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Cha TJ, Ehrlich JR, Zhang L, Shi YF, Tardif JC, Leung TK, Nattel S. Dissociation between ionic remodeling and ability to sustain atrial fibrillation during recovery from experimental congestive heart failure. Circulation. 2004; 109: 412–418.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Hanna N, Cardin S, Leung TK, Nattel S. Differences in atrial versus ventricular remodeling in dogs with ventricular tachypaced-induced congestive heart failure. Cardiovasc Res. 2004; 63: 236–244.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Verheule S, Sato T, Everett T 4th, Otten D, Rubart-von der Lohe M, Nakajima HO, Nakajima H, Field LJ, Olgin JE. Increased vulnerability to atrial fibrillation in transgenic mice with selective atrial fibrosis caused by overexpression of TGF-beta1. Circ Res. 2004; 94: 1458–1465.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Liu B, Yu J, Taylor L, Zhou X, Polgar P. Microarray and phosphokinase screenings leading to studies on ERK and JNK regulation of connective tissue growth factor expression by angiotensin II 1a and bradykinin B2 receptors in Rat1 fibroblasts. J Cell Biochem. 2006; 97: 1104–1120.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

30. Mulsow JJ, Watson RW, Fitzpatrick JM, O’Connell PR. Transforming growth factor-beta promotes pro-fibrotic behavior by serosal fibroblasts via PKC and ERK1/2 mitogen activated protein kinase cell signaling. Ann Surg. 2005; 242: 880–887.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

31. Ott C, Iwanciw D, Graness A, Giehl K, Goppelt-Struebe M. Modulation of the expression of connective tissue growth factor by alterations of the cytoskeleton. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 44305–44311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Wahab NA, Weston BS, Mason RM. Modulation of the TGFbeta/Smad signaling pathway in mesangial cells by CTGF/CCN2. Exp Cell Res. 2005; 307: 305–314.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

33. Crean JK, Finlay D, Murphy M, Moss C, Godson C, Martin F, Brady HR. The role of p42/44 MAPK and protein kinase B in connective tissue growth factor induced extracellular matrix protein production, cell migration, and actin cytoskeletal rearrangement in human mesangial cells. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 44187–44194.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Brundel BJ, Ausma J, van Gelder IC, Van der Want JJ, van Gilst WH, Crijns HJ, Henning RH. Activation of proteolysis by calpains and structural changes in human paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 54: 380–389.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Christ T, Boknik P, Wohrl S, Wettwer E, Graf EM, Bosch RF, Knaut M, Schmitz W, Ravens U, Dobrev D. L-type Ca2+ current downregulation in chronic human atrial fibrillation is associated with increased activity of protein phosphatases. Circulation. 2004; 110: 2651–2657.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
K. Nishida, G. Michael, D. Dobrev, and S. Nattel
Animal models for atrial fibrillation: clinical insights and scientific opportunities
Europace, October 29, 2009; (2009) eup328v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
H. Shan, Y. Zhang, Y. Lu, Y. Zhang, Z. Pan, B. Cai, N. Wang, X. Li, T. Feng, Y. Hong, et al.
Downregulation of miR-133 and miR-590 contributes to nicotine-induced atrial remodelling in canines
Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2009; 83(3): 465 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vet PatholHome page
E. J. Kort, P. Norton, P. Haak, B. Berghuis, S. Ramirez, and J. Resau
Review Paper: Gene Expression Profiling in Veterinary and Human Medicine: Overview of Applications and Proposed Quality Control Practices
Vet. Pathol., July 1, 2009; 46(4): 598 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. Maguy, S. Le Bouter, P. Comtois, D. Chartier, L. Villeneuve, R. Wakili, K. Nishida, and S. Nattel
Ion Channel Subunit Expression Changes in Cardiac Purkinje Fibers: A Potential Role in Conduction Abnormalities Associated With Congestive Heart Failure
Circ. Res., May 8, 2009; 104(9): 1113 - 1122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular MedicineHome page
A. J. Camm, P. Kirchhof, G. Y.H. Lip, I. Savelieva, and S. Ernst
CHAPTER 29 Atrial Fibrillation
ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, January 1, 2009; 2(1): med-9780199566990-chapter - med-9780199566990-chapter.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
S. Nattel
Effects of Heart Disease on Cardiac Ion Current Density Versus Current Amplitude: Important Conceptual Subtleties in the Language of Arrhythmogenic Ion Channel Remodeling
Circ. Res., June 6, 2008; 102(11): 1298 - 1300.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Arrhythm ElectrophysiolHome page
S. Nattel, B. Burstein, and D. Dobrev
Atrial Remodeling and Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanisms and Implications
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, April 1, 2008; 1(1): 62 - 73.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. Burstein, E. Libby, A. Calderone, and S. Nattel
Differential Behaviors of Atrial Versus Ventricular Fibroblasts: A Potential Role for Platelet-Derived Growth Factor in Atrial-Ventricular Remodeling Differences
Circulation, April 1, 2008; 117(13): 1630 - 1641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. Burstein and S. Nattel
Atrial Fibrosis: Mechanisms and Clinical Relevance in Atrial Fibrillation
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 26, 2008; 51(8): 802 - 809.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
B. Burstein, X.-Y. Qi, Y.-H. Yeh, A. Calderone, and S. Nattel
Atrial cardiomyocyte tachycardia alters cardiac fibroblast function: A novel consideration in atrial remodeling
Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2007; 76(3): 442 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/3/425    most recent
01.RES.0000258428.09589.1av1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cardin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nattel, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cardin, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nattel, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Arrythmias-basic studies
Right arrow Gene expression
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs