| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Molecular Medicine |
Through Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 and p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein KinaseDependent Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in MacrophagesFrom the Department of Metabolic Medicine (M.Y., T.M., T.S., N.I., Y.M., K.T., H.M., T.T., K.S., D.K., T.N., E.A.), Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Japan; Department of Physiology (Y.T.), Graduate School of Medicine, Kanazawa University, Japan; Laboratory of Nutrition Chemistry (T.K.), Division of Food Science and Biotechnology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Japan; and Department of Medicine, Diabetes Research Center (M.B.), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.
Correspondence to Takeshi Matsumura, MD, PhD, Department of Metabolic Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1, Honjo, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan. E-mail takeshim{at}gpo.kumamoto-u.ac.jp
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ligands have been reported to protect against the progression of atherosclerosis. In the present study, we investigated the effects of statins on PPAR
activation in macrophages. Statins increased PPAR
activity, which was inhibited by mevalonate, farnesylpyrophosphate, or geranylgeranylpyrophosphate. Furthermore, a farnesyl transferase inhibitor and a geranylgeranyl transferase inhibitor mimicked the effects of statins. Statins inhibited the membrane translocations of Ras, RhoA, Rac, and Cdc42, and overexpression of dominant-negative mutants of RhoA (DN-RhoA) and Cdc42 (DN-Cdc42), but not of Ras or Rac, increased PPAR
activity. Statins induced extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation. However, DN-RhoA and DN-Cdc42 activated p38 MAPK, but not ERK1/2. ERK1/2- or p38 MAPKspecific inhibitors abrogated statin-induced PPAR
activation. Statins induced cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 expression and increased intracellular 15-deoxy-
12,14-prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2) levels through ERK1/2- and p38 MAPKdependent pathways, and inhibitors or small interfering RNA of COX-2 inhibited statin-induced PPAR
activation. Statins also activate PPAR
via COX-2dependent increases in 15d-PGJ2 levels. We further demonstrated that statins inhibited lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor
or monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 mRNA expression, and these effects by statins were abrogated by the PPAR
antagonist T0070907 or by small interfering RNA of PPAR
or PPAR
. Statins also induced ATP-binding cassette protein A1 or CD36 mRNA expression, and these effects were suppressed by small interfering RNAs of PPAR
or PPAR
. In conclusion, statins induce COX-2dependent increase in 15d-PGJ2 level through a RhoA- and Cdc42-dependent p38 MAPK pathway and a RhoA- and Cdc42-independent ERK1/2 pathway, thereby activating PPAR
. Statins also activate PPAR
via COX-2dependent pathway. These effects of statins may explain their antiatherogenic actions.
Key Words: cyclooxygenase MAPK macrophages PPAR statins
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cholesterol is synthesized via the isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway.3 In this pathway, isopentenyl-PP is the basic isoprene unit used for synthesis of all subsequent isoprenoids.3 Among the isoprenoids, farnesylpyrophosphate (FPP) and geranylgeranylpyrophosphate (GGPP) serve as important lipid attachments for several proteins, including the small GTP-binding protein Ras and Ras-like proteins, such as Rho, Rac, and Cdc42, whose proper membrane localization and function are dependent on isoprenylation.3 The pleiotropic effects of statins are thought to be mediated by blocking the synthesis of FPP and GGPP, resulting the inhibition of small GTP-binding proteins,3 and these include improving the function of endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, and macrophages.3
Mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are serine/threonine protein kinases that can phosphorylate their target proteins.4 Three major subfamilies have been: extracellular-signal regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK1/2), p38 MAPKs, and Jun N-terminal kinases/stress-activated protein kinases (JNKs/SAPKs).4 MAPKs are activated by a family of MAPK kinases (MKKs)4 and play an important role in regulating cell growth, migration, and differentiation and production of several inflammatory genes, including cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2).5 In particular, ERK1/2- and p38MAPK-dependent COX-2 production by several mediators induce the production of prostaglandins, such as prostaglandin E2 (PGE2).6
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)
, a member of the nuclear hormone receptor family of ligand-dependent transcription factors, has been well characterized as a regulator of adipogenesis and is abundant in fat cells.7 However, PPAR
also mediates several antiatherogenic effects in atherosclerotic lesions.8 In fact, PPAR
agonists have been shown to inhibit the development of atherosclerosis in vivo.9 Thus, the activation of PPAR
may be beneficial for the suppression of atherosclerosis.
PPAR
agonists improve endothelial function, inhibit the proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells, and inhibit the production of inflammatory cytokines and MMPs in macrophages.8 Because the antiatherogenic effects of PPAR
agonists and statins have some common characteristics, we hypothesized that a common mechanism may exist via crosstalk of their pathways. Indeed, statins have been reported to increase the DNA-binding activity of PPAR
to PPAR-response elements in monocytes.10,11 However, the mechanisms of statin-induced PPAR
activation in macrophages are not yet fully understood. The aims of the present study were to clarify whether statins have the capacity to activate PPAR
in macrophages and to examine their underlying mechanisms. We demonstrate that statins induce COX-2dependent increase in intracellular 15-deoxy-
-12,14-prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2) levels through both a RhoA- and Cdc42-dependent p38 MAPK pathway and a RhoA- and Cdc42-independent ERK1/2 pathway, thereby activating PPAR
.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
via Suppression of the Mevalonate Pathway in Macrophages
in RAW264.7 cells using the full-length PPAR
system. All 5 statins increased luciferase activity in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 1A). We next examined the effect of these statins on PPAR
ligand-binding activity using the GAL4 chimera system. Statins also increased luciferase activity in a concentration-dependent manner in this system (Figure 1B). Fluvastatin at 1 µmol/L increased PPAR
ligand-binding activity by 5.6-fold in mouse peritoneal macrophages (P<0.01 versus the control) and 4.5-fold in THP-1 macrophages (P<0.01 versus the control).
|
PPAR
activities induced by statins were lower than those induced by the same concentration of pioglitazone and were 58%, 31%, 29%, 15%, and 73% of that induced by pioglitazone for fluvastatin, pitavastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin, and cerivastatin, respectively (Figure 1C).
We next examined the effects of mevalonate and its metabolites on PPAR
activation. The statin-induced increases in luciferase activity were completely prevented by mevalonate, but not by cholesterol (Figure 1D), and were partially prevented by FPP or GGPP (Figure 1D). Moreover, the farnesyl transferase inhibitor FTI-276 and the geranylgeranyl transferase inhibitor GGTI-286 increased luciferase activity (Figure 1D). On the other hand, statins had no effect on PPAR
mRNA or protein levels (Figure I in the online data supplement).
Suppression of RhoA- and Cdc42-Dependent Signaling Pathways Activate PPAR
Statins inhibit the activation of small G proteins by suppressing their farnesylation or geranylgeranylation.3 Indeed, we confirmed that fluvastatin, pitavastatin, and simvastatin suppressed the membrane translocation of Ras, RhoA, Rac, and Cdc42 (supplemental Figure II). Therefore, we next examined the effects of overexpression of dominant-negative (DN)-Ras, DN-RhoA, DN-Rac or DN-Cdc42 on PPAR
activation. Overexpression of DN-RhoA or DN-Cdc42 increased luciferase activity, whereas DN-Ras or DN-Rac had no effect (Figure 2A). Moreover, overexpression of both DN-RhoA and DN-Cdc42 showed an additive effect (Figure 2A).
|
Involvement of ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK in Statin-Induced PPAR
Activation
We next examined the involvement of ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK in statin-induced PPAR
activation. Statins induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK in RAW264.7 cells (Figure 2B), and these effects were prevented by FPP or GGPP (Figure 2C). We next examined the time course of ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK phosphorylation by statins. Fluvastatin increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation after 12 hours of incubation, and this increase was maintained until 24 hours. p38 MAPK phosphorylation also was increased after 12 hours of incubation; however, this increase was attenuated by 28% after 24 hours of incubation (supplemental Figure III). On the other hand, DN-RhoA and DN-Cdc42 had no effect on ERK1/2 phosphorylation (Figure 2D) but induced MAPK phosphorylation (Figure 2E), and an additive effect was observed in cells infected with both DN-RhoA and DN-Cdc42 (Figure 2E). Furthermore, the fluvastatin-induced PPAR
activation was inhibited by the MAPK/ERK kinase-specific inhibitor PD98059 or the p38 MAPK-specific inhibitor SB203580, and the combination of both inhibitors further enhanced the suppression of PPAR
activation (Figure 2F). On the other hand, DN-RhoA- or DN-Cdc42-induced PPAR
activation was inhibited by SB203580, whereas PD98059 had no effect (Figure 2A).
Statins Decreased the Intracellular Long-Chain Fatty Acid Level
Long-chain fatty acids (FAs), including arachidonic acid, linoleic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid, activate PPAR
.12 Therefore, we next examined whether statins increased the intracellular FA level. Statins decreased the level of intracellular arachidonic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and docosahexaenoic acid (supplemental Table I), and the fluvastatin-mediated decrease in arachidonic acid was blocked by a small interfering RNA (siRNA) against COX-2 (supplemental Table II).
Statins Induce COX-2 Expression
We next examined whether statins induced COX-2 expression. Statins induced COX-2 mRNA (Figure 3A) and protein (Figure 3C) expression. Time course experiments revealed that fluvastatin induced COX-2 protein expression after 12 hours of incubation, and this production was continued until 24 hours of incubation (supplemental Figure III). The statins also increased luciferase activity in cells transfected with pGL3-pCOX2 (Figure 3E). Overexpression of DN-RhoA or DN-Cdc42, but not DN-Ras or DN-Rac, induced COX-2 mRNA and protein expression as well as transcriptional activation of the COX-2 gene, and overexpression of both DN-RhoA and DN-Cdc42 showed an additive effect (Figure 3B, 3D, and 3F). On the other hand, the statins had no effect on the expression of COX-1 mRNA or protein (data not shown).
|
Furthermore, fluvastatin-induced COX-2 mRNA and protein expression were suppressed by PD98058 or SB203580, and the combination of both inhibitors further enhanced the suppression of COX-2 expression (Figure 3G and 3H).
Statins Increase Intracellular 15d-PGJ2 Level
We speculated that overexpression of COX-2 may increase the intracellular 15d-PGJ2 level, which is a natural ligand for PPAR
. Therefore, we next examined whether statins could increase the intracellular 15d-PGJ2 level using an enzyme immunoassay detection system. Statins, as well as overexpression of DN-RhoA or DN-Cdc42, increased intracellular 15d-PGJ2 level (Figure 4A and 4B), and overexpression of both DN-RhoA and DN-Cdc42 showed an additive effect (Figure 4B). Moreover, PD98059 or SB203580 suppressed the fluvastatin-induced increase in 15d-PGJ2, and the combination of both inhibitors further suppressed it (Figure 4C).
|
Statins also increased intracellular PGE2 levels (supplemental Figure IV). The PPAR
antagonist T0070907 did not inhibit fluvastatin-induced increases in 15d-PGJ2 and PGE2 (data not shown), suggesting that these effects by statins were not mediated by the activation of PPAR
.
Overexpression of COX-2 Is Involved in Statin-Induced PPAR
Activation
We next examined the effects of the COX-2 inhibitors NS-398 or meloxicam and COX-2 siRNA on statin-induced PPAR
activation. NS-398, meloxicam, and COX-2 siRNA suppressed basal luciferase activity in unstimulated conditions (Figure 4D and 4E). Fluvastatin-, pitavastatin-, and simvastatin-induced PPAR
activation were inhibited by NS-398 or meloxicam (Figure 4D). The COX-2 siRNA also inhibited statin-induced PPAR
activation (Figure 4E).
On the other hand, PPAR
siRNA did not inhibit the statin-induced expression of COX-2 protein (data not shown), suggesting that COX-2 expression was not a downstream signal but an upstream signal on PPAR
activation.
Statins Activate PPAR
via Overexpression of COX-2
We next examined the effects of fluvastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin, pitavastatin, and cerivastatin on PPAR
ligand-binding activity using the GAL4 chimera system. Statins increased luciferase activity in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 5A). Moreover, the COX-2 siRNA inhibited fluvastatin-induced PPAR
activation (Figure 5B). Furthermore, 15d-PGJ2 activated both PPAR
and PPAR
in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 5C), suggesting that statins also activated PPAR
via a COX-2dependent increase in 15d-PGJ2 level.
|
Statins Suppress Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Inflammatory Responses Through PPAR
and PPAR
To clarify the role of PPARs activation on statin-induced antiinflammatory effect, we next examined the effect of T0070907, PPAR
siRNA, and PPAR
siRNA on statin-mediated suppression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)
or monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 mRNA expression, and suppression of nuclear factor (NF)-
B or activator protein (AP)-1 activation. First, we examined the appropriate concentration of T0070907 and found that 10 nmol/L T0070907 completely suppressed statin-induced PPAR
activation, and this concentration had no effect on PPAR
activation (supplemental Figure V). Pitavastatin suppressed lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced TNF
and MCP-1 mRNA expression, and 10 nmol/L T0070907 abrogated the inhibitory effect of pitavastatin (Figure 6A and 6B). PPAR
siRNA or PPAR
siRNA recovered pitavastatin-mediated suppression of TNF
and MCP-1 mRNA expression, and an additive effect of siRNAs for PPAR
and PPAR
was observed (Figure 6C and 6D). Pitavastatin also suppressed LPS-induced NF-
B and AP-1 activation (Figure 6E and 6F). PPAR
siRNA or PPAR
siRNA recovered pitavastatin-mediated suppression of NF-
B and AP-1 activation, and an additive effect of the siRNAs was observed (Figure 6E and 6F).
|
Statins Induce ATP-Binding Cassette Protein A1 and CD36 mRNA expression through PPAR
and PPAR
To clarify whether statins promote gene transcription in a PPAR-dependent manner, we examined the effect of pitavastatin on mRNA expression of ATP-binding cassette protein A1 (ABCA1) and CD36. Pitavastatin induced ABCA1 and CD36 mRNA expression (Figure 7A and 7B). PPAR
siRNA or PPAR
siRNA suppressed pitavastatin-induced ABCA1 and CD36 mRNA expression, and an additive effect of the siRNAs was observed (Figure 7A and 7B).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
activation and its mechanisms in macrophages. Atorvastatin and pravastatin were reported to activate PPAR
in human monocytes.10,11 However, our preliminary data show that human monocytes do not express PPAR
, whereas human monocyte-derived macrophages do express PPAR
(T.M. and M.Y., unpublished data, 2006). Chinetti et al also reported similar results.13 Thus, it is important to investigate the ability of statins to activate PPAR
and to investigate their mechanisms in macrophages. Moreover, Argmann et al reported that statins induced ABCA1 expression through PPAR
in macrophages.14 However, they only used the PPAR
antagonist GW9662 and did not investigate PPAR
activity directly.14 Thus, this is the first report of a direct effect of statins on PPAR
activation in macrophages.
Statins are classified into 2 groups: the first including hydrophilic compounds, the other including lipophilic compounds. The membrane permeability of lipophilic statins is higher than that of hydrophilic statins. In fact, pravastatin, among the hydrophilic statins, also activates PPAR
in macrophages. However, its action requires concentrations 100 times higher than those required for lipophilic statins to be active (T.M. and M.Y., unpublished data, 2006). Therefore, we used 5 lipophilic statins, which are currently being (or have previously been) used in clinical use. Among the 5 statins, the concentration of cerivastatin required for induction of PPAR
activation was the lowest. Among the other statins, the necessary concentration for PPAR
activation was lowest in fluvastatin, increasing in the following order: pitavastatin, simvastatin, and atorvastatin.
It was reported that cholesterol depletion induces the production of PPAR
and its ligands in HepG2 and 3T3-L1 cells.15 However, we demonstrated that statins did not induce PPAR
expression in macrophages and that the addition of excess amounts of cholesterol did not inhibit statin-induced PPAR
activation. Therefore, we speculated other mechanisms may exist in statin-induced PPAR
activation.
We demonstrated here that mevalonate completely inhibited statin-induced PPAR
activation. We also demonstrated that statins increased the PPAR
ligand-binding activity, whereas mevalonate completely inhibited these effects. Thus, statins may be not direct ligands of PPAR
, and one of the mechanisms for the statin-induced PPAR
activation may be increases in the amounts of intracellular PPAR
ligands.
From our results using FTI and GGTI, inhibition of farnesylation and geranylgeranylation may be involved mainly in statin-induced PPAR
activation. Statins inhibit the activation of small G proteins by suppressing their farnesylation and geranylgeranylation.3 In addition, statins have been reported to activate PPAR
through inhibition of the RhoA-signaling pathway.16 We demonstrated that overexpression of DN-RhoA or DN-Cdc42 activate PPAR
, suggesting that not only RhoA but also Cdc42 negatively control the activation of PPAR
in the unstimulated state and that statins abrogate these negative effects, thereby activating PPAR
. Moreover, because an additive effect of DN-RhoA and DN-Cdc42 on PPAR
activation was observed, the mechanisms of PPAR
activation induced by the downstream signaling pathways of RhoA and Cdc42 may be different.
Members of the Rho protein family are targets of protein geranylgeranylation. However, the effects of statins were mediated by both farnesylation and geranylgeranylation. This may be explained by an alternative modification of small G proteins. Indeed, RhoB can be either geranylgeranylated or farnesylated by geranylgeranyl transferase I.17 Thus, RhoA or Cdc42 may be prenylated by FPP.
The MAPK cascade is among the downstream signaling pathways of small G proteins, and PPAR
is negatively regulated by MAPK via its phosphorylation.18 Therefore, we speculated that statins may suppress the MAPK cascade, thereby activating PPAR
. However, statins did not inhibit, but rather activated, ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK. In fact, atorvastatin does not induce serine phosphorylation of PPAR
in THP-1 cells.14 Thus, statin-induced PPAR
activation cannot be mediated by inhibition of MAPK-dependent serine phosphorylation.
We demonstrated that ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK activation by statins was mediated by the suppression of farnesylation and geranylgeranylation. Moreover, statin-induced PPAR
activation was inhibited by PD98059 and SB203580, and an additive effect of the inhibitors was observed. Thus, statin-induced suppression of prenylation could induce ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK activation, although the mechanisms of PPAR
activation induced by the downstream signaling pathways of ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK may be different.
Our results suggest that statins activate ERK1/2 via a RhoA- and Cdc42-independent pathway and activate p38 MAPK via RhoA- and Cdc42-dependent pathway, thereby activating PPAR
. However, the mechanisms of prenylation-dependent ERK1/2 activation and RhoA- or Cdc42-dependent p38 MAPK activation are not fully understood. Further studies are necessary to clarify the mechanisms of statin-induced ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK activation.
Because COXs have the ability to produce prostaglandins, we speculated that statins may induce endogenous prostaglandin production via COXs expression. Our results demonstrated that statins did not induce COX-1 expression but induced COX-2 expression, suggesting that statin-induced COX-2 expression was selective. Interestingly, COX-2 expression was induced by both RhoA inhibition and Cdc42 inhibition, and statin-induced COX-2 expression was mediated by ERK or p38 MAPK. These results are supported by previous reports.19,20 Moreover, COX-2 specific inhibition abrogated statin-induced PPAR
activation. Furthermore, statins increased intracellular 15d-PGJ2, which is one of the natural PPAR
ligands, through ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK activation, and the same phenomenon was observed for DN-RhoA or DN-Cdc42. Therefore, statin-induced increase in 15d-PGJ2 level mediated by overexpression of COX-2 through RhoA- or Cdc42-dependent p38 MAPK activation and RhoA- or Cdc42-independent ERK1/2 activation may be one of the important mechanisms in PPAR
activation.
We also found that COX-2 specific inhibition suppressed basal activity of PPAR
, suggesting that basal activity of PPAR
is mediated by COX-2dependent production of prostaglandins in unstimulated conditions.
PGE2, which has been reported to be an atherogenic molecule, is also induced by statins. However, the level of induction of PGE2 was far lower than 15d-PGJ2. Therefore, statins might be selective in eicosanoid production by unknown mechanism(s). Our present study is supported by a previous report that demonstrated that statins increased myocardial content of COX-2 expression and prostaglandin production.21 Moreover, as PPAR
agonists are useful for treating myocardial damage,22 statins might have protective effects against myocardial damage, at least in part through PPAR
activation.
Interestingly, statins decreased the intracellular FA levels, and statin-mediated decrease in arachidonic acid was blocked by COX-2 inhibition, suggesting that arachidonic acid was used for prostaglandin production by COX-2.
Statins was reported to activate PPAR
via dephosphorylation of PPAR
.16 On the other hand, we demonstrated that statin-induced activation of PPAR
was suppressed by COX-2 specific inhibition and that 15d-PGJ2 activated both PPAR
and PPAR
, suggesting that statin-induced PPAR
activation is, at least in part, mediated by COX-2dependent increase in 15d-PGJ2 level.
The production of inflammatory molecules, which is involved in the acceleration of atherosclerosis,3 is suppressed by statins in macrophages. Most of the production of inflammatory molecules are mediated by activation of NF-
B or AP-1. Paumelle et al reported that simvastatin has antiinflammatory effects trough PPAR
.23 Here, we further demonstrated that statins suppressed LPS-induced expression of TNF
and MCP-1 and activation of NF-
B and AP-1 through PPAR
- and PPAR
-dependent pathways. Therefore, statins might suppress inflammatory responses via activation of both PPAR
and PPAR
, thereby inducing antiatherogenic actions.
ABCA1, which is involved in the control of apolipoprotein AImediated cholesterol efflux, and CD36, which is a scavenger receptor expressed in macrophages, are reported to be induced by agonists of PPAR
and PPAR
.24,25 We revealed that statin induced expression of ABCA1 and CD36 mRNA, and these effects were abrogated by siRNAs of PPAR
and PPAR
, suggesting that statins induce the expression of ABCA1 and CD36 via both PPAR
and PPAR
.
A statin concentration of 10 µmol/L, which we mainly used in the present study, might exceed the blood concentration in clinical use. However, our results demonstrated that PPAR
activation was observed following administration of statins at concentrations as low as 0.5 µmol/L; expression of COX-2 and an increase in 15d-PGJ2 level are also induced by 0.5 µmol/L fluvastatin (T.M. and M.Y., unpublished data, 2006). Because these concentrations of statins, especially those for fluvastatin and pitavastatin, are close to their blood concentrations in clinical use, it is possible that PPAR
activation induced by some statins has physiological relevance for clinical use.
We previously demonstrated that statins, as well as PPAR
agonists, inhibit oxidized LDL-induced macrophage proliferation.26,27 Therefore, statin-mediated suppression of macrophage proliferation might be caused by PPAR
activation. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of PPAR
activation on statin-mediated suppression of macrophage proliferation.
Because statins, as well as thiazolidinediones, have the capacity to activate PPAR
, treatment with statins may improve insulin sensitivity in patients. In fact, pravastatin reduces the incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus,28 and cerivastatin improves insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes patients.29 Our preliminary data also indicate that statins activate PPAR
in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and enhance adipocyte differentiation (T.M. and M.Y., unpublished data, 2006). Thus, it is possible that statins may act as anti-diabetic compounds.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that statins activate PPAR
and that these effects are mediated by the suppression of FPP and GGPP. Statins induce p38 MAPKdependent COX-2 expression by suppressing a RhoA- and Cdc42-dependent signaling pathway. Statin-induced COX-2 expression is also mediated by ERK1/2 activation through a RhoA- and Cdc42-independent signaling pathway. Finally, these signal increases in 15d-PGJ2 levels, thereby activating PPAR
. These results could explain, at least in part, the antiatherogenic and antidiabetic effects of statins and may lead to the design of novel therapeutic approaches against atherosclerosis and diabetes.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Sources of Funding
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (grant 16046219 to E.A. and grant 19591056 to T.M.) and by a grant from the Takeda Science Foundation (to T.M.).
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Original received July 18, 2006; resubmission received November 15, 2006; revised resubmission received March 30, 2007; accepted April 17, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and promotes adipocyte differentiation. Cell. 1995; 83: 813819.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
ligands inhibit development of atherosclerosis in LDL receptor-deficient mice. J Clin Invest. 2000; 106: 523531.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
and attenuates the inflammatory response in human monocytes. Inflamm Res. 2002; 51: 5862.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
and NF
B expression by pravastatin in response to lipoproteins in human monocytes in vitro. Pharmacol Res. 2002; 45: 147154.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
and
induces apoptosis of human monocyte-derived macrophages. J Biol Chem. 1998; 273: 2557325580.
expression by adipocyte differentiation and determination factor 1/sterol regulatory element binding protein 1: implications for adipocyte differentiation and metabolism. Mol Cell Biol. 1999; 19: 54955503.
and induces HDL apoA-I. J Clin Invest. 2001; 107: 14231432.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
. Science. 1996; 274: 21002103.
expression in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 596602.
via inhibition of the protein kinase C signaling pathway. Circ Res. 2006; 98: 361369.
and PPAR-
activators induce cholesterol removal from human macrophage foam cells through stimulation of the ABCA1 pathway. Nat Med. 2001; 7: 5358.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
and
ligands. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277: 1570315711.Related Article:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Taketa, T. Matsumura, M. Yano, N. Ishii, T. Senokuchi, H. Motoshima, Y. Murata, S. Kim-Mitsuyama, T. Kawada, H. Itabe, et al. Oxidized Low Density Lipoprotein Activates Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor-{alpha} (PPAR{alpha}) and PPAR{gamma} through MAPK-dependent COX-2 Expression in Macrophages J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2008; 283(15): 9852 - 9862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kourimate, C. Le May, C. Langhi, A. L. Jarnoux, K. Ouguerram, Y. Zair, P. Nguyen, M. Krempf, B. Cariou, and P. Costet Dual Mechanisms for the Fibrate-mediated Repression of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2008; 283(15): 9666 - 9673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||