| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integrative Physiology |
in Coronary Microembolization
From the Institute of Pathophysiology (A.S., P.G., S.H., R.S., G.H.) and Department of Cardiology (R.E.), Center of Internal Medicine, University of Essen Medical School; and Lukaskrankenhaus (M.H.), Neuss, Germany.
Correspondence to Prof Dr Gerd Heusch, Institut für Pathophysiologie, Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45122 Essen, Germany. E-mail gerd.heusch{at}uk-essen.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(TNF-
) expression, resulting in progressive contractile dysfunction. However, TNF-
is not only a negative inotrope but can also protect the myocardium against infarction. In anesthetized pigs, we studied whether ME protects against infarction when TNF-
expression is increased. ME (group1; n=7) was induced by intracoronary infusion of microspheres (42 µm; 3000 per mL/min inflow). Controls (group 2; n=8) received saline. Groups 3 and 4 (n=4 each) were pretreated with ovine TNF-
antibodies (25 mg/kg body weight) 30 minutes before ME or placebo, respectively. Ischemia (90 minutes) was induced 6 hours after ME when TNF-
was increased (66±21 pg/g wet weight; mean±SEM) or after placebo (TNF-
, 21±10 pg/g; P<0.05). Infarct size (percentage area at risk) was determined after 2 hours of reperfusion (triphenyl tetrazolium chloride staining). ME decreased systolic wall thickening progressively over 6 hours (group 1 versus group 2, 65±4% versus 90±1%; percentage of baseline; P<0.05). TNF-
antibodies attenuated the progressive decrease in systolic wall thickening following ME (group 3, 77±5% of baseline; P<0.05 versus group 1) with no effect in controls (group 4; 90±8% of baseline). With ME, infarct size was decreased to 18±4% versus 33±4% in group 2 (P<0.05). The infarct size reduction was abolished by TNF-
antibodies (group 3 versus group 4, 29±3% versus 35±5%). In ME, TNF-
is responsible for both progressive contractile dysfunction and delayed protection against infarction.
Key Words: microembolization inflammation myocardial infarction TNF-
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(TNF-
). The major sources of TNF-
in microembolized myocardium are the viable cardiomyocytes surrounding the microinfarcts,8 and it is this increase in myocardial TNF-
that is causal for the progressive contractile dysfunction.810
Although coronary microembolization causes the release of coronary venous adenosine,5,11 it neither induces acute preconditioning against acute infarction11 nor interferes with a classic ischemic preconditioning protocol.12 We now wondered whether the increased TNF-
expression may not only mediate progressive contractile dysfunction but also induce delayed protection against infarction. In fact, in isolated rat hearts, pretreatment with TNF-
reduces the infarct size after ischemia/reperfusion.13 This protective effect was confirmed in mouse14 and rabbit15 models. Moreover, TNF-
is also involved in the endogenous protection by ischemic preconditioning. In TNF-
knockout mice, acute14 and delayed ischemic preconditioning16 are abrogated and TNF-
antibodies inhibit delayed ischemic preconditioning in rats.17 Therefore, for the present report, we used our established model of coronary microembolization in pigs11,12 to investigate whether 6 hours after coronary microembolizationat a time when TNF-
tissue levels are increased and contractile dysfunction has developed11the myocardium is protected against infarction. This experimental protocol attempts to replicate the clinical scenario of a patient experiencing coronary microembolization caused by fissure of an unstable coronary plaque and subsequent massive plaque rupture and thrombotic occlusion of a large epicardial coronary artery with impending myocardial infarction some hours later.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Preparation
Twenty-three Göttinger minipigs (20 to 40 kg) of either sex were initially sedated using ketamine hydrochloride (1 g IM) and then anesthetized with thiopental (Trapanal, 500 mg IV). Through a midline cervical incision the trachea was intubated for connection to a respirator (Dräger, Lübeck, Germany). Anesthesia was then maintained using enflurane (1% to 1.5%) with an oxygen/nitrous oxide mixture (40%:60%). Arterial blood gases were monitored frequently in the initial stages of the preparation until stable and then periodically throughout the study (Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark). Rectal temperature was monitored and maintained between 37°C and 38°C by use of a heated surgical table and drapes. The common carotid arteries were cannulated with polyethylene catheters, the first to measure arterial pressure and the other to supply blood to the extracorporeal circuit. The jugular veins were cannulated for volume replacement using warmed 0.9% saline.
A left lateral thoracotomy was performed in the fourth intercostal space and the pericardium opened. A micromanometer (P7; Konigsberg Instruments Inc, Pasadena, Calif) was placed in the left ventricle through the apex, together with a saline-filled polyethylene catheter (used to calibrate the micromanometer in situ). Ultrasonic dimension gauges were implanted in the left ventricular myocardium to measure the thickness of the anterior and posterior (control) wall. The left anterior descending coronary artery was dissected over a distance of 1.5 cm, ligated, cannulated, and perfused from an extracorporeal circuit. Before coronary cannulation, the pigs were anticoagulated with 20 000 IU sodium heparin; additional doses of 10 000 IU were given at hourly intervals. The system included a roller pump, windkessel, and a side port for the injection of microspheres. Coronary arterial pressure was measured from the sidearm of a polyethylene T-connector (Cole-Parmer, Chicago, Ill) used as catheter tip with an external transducer (pvb Medizintechnik, Kirchseon, Germany). Initially, minimal coronary arterial pressure was held at >70 mm Hg by adjusting the roller pump of the extracorporeal circuit to avoid hypoperfusion before ischemia. Heart rate was controlled throughout the study by left atrial pacing (Hugo Sachs Elektronik Type 215/T, Hugstetten, Germany) slightly above the spontaneous rate.
Regional Myocardial Blood Flow
Approximately 270 000 radiolabeled microspheres (15 µm in diameter; 141Ce, 51Cr, 103Ru, 95Nb, or 46Sc; NEN-Perkin-Elmer, Boston, Mass) were injected into the coronary perfusion circuit to determine the regional myocardial blood flow and its distribution throughout the left anterior descending coronary artery perfusion bed (model 5912, Gammaszint BF 5300 Packard, Germany). Use of microspheres of this diameter and number does not cause microinfarction in our experience.
Coronary Microembolization
Coronary microembolization was induced by injecting 3000 white-colored polystyrene microspheres (diameter, 42 µm; Dynospheres, Dyno Particles, Lillestrøm, Norway) per mL · min1 coronary inflow into the perfusion system. The microspheres were suspended with 0.02% Tween in 1 mL of saline as vehicle. In preliminary experiments, this size and number of injected microspheres best reflected the pattern of microinfarcts that was previously observed in patients with unstable angina who died of sudden cardiac death and were subsequently autopsied.3,4
TNF-
Tissue Concentration and Neutralization of TNF-
The tissue concentration of TNF-
was determined in myocardial snap frozen drill biopsies (weight 10 to 20 mg) taken 6 hours after coronary microembolization or placebo, respectively, from the microembolized myocardium and a remote control area. Tissue concentrations of TNF-
were measured using a commercial ELISA assay specific for porcine TNF-
(R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn).
To neutralize TNF-
, antibodies raised in a sheep against recombinant murine TNF-
were slowly infused intracoronarily at a total dose of 25 mg/kg body weight. In prior in vitro experiments, the TNF-
antibodies neutralized TNF-
in serum samples from microembolized dogs by more than 80%.8
The infusion of TNF-
antibodies was initiated 30 minutes before coronary microembolization or placebo, respectively. The presence of the TNF-
antibodies in the myocardium was proven in biopsies taken at 6 hours after coronary microembolization or placebo, respectively, by immunofluorescence microscopy using fluorescein isothiocyanate-coupled antibodies directed against sheep IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif). Because the TNF-
antibodies were assumed to neutralize TNF-
but not to interfere with its expression, TNF-
was not measured in homogenates from animals receiving TNF-
antibodies.
Infarct Size
At the end of each study, the heart was removed and sectioned from base to apex into 5 transverse slices in a plane parallel to the atrioventricular groove. The slices were immersed in 0.09 mol · L1 sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 1.0% triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Munich, Germany) and 8% dextran (molecular mass, 77 800 Da) for 20 minutes at 37°C to identify infarcted tissue. The amount of infarcted tissue is expressed as percentage of the left ventricular area at risk, as determined by the microspheres technique.18
Experimental Protocols
Group 1
Following baseline measurements of systemic hemodynamics and regional myocardial blood flow, coronary microembolization was induced in group 1 (n=7), as described above. During microembolization, coronary inflow was held constant. Thereafter, coronary perfusion pressure was maintained at baseline levels for 6 hours. Measurements of systemic hemodynamics and regional myocardial blood flow were repeated, and myocardial drill biopsies were taken. Ischemia was induced by reduction of coronary inflow to 15% of baseline flow. At 5 minutes of ischemia, measurements were again repeated. After 90 minutes ischemia the myocardium was reperfused for 2 hours before infarct size was determined by TTC staining.
Group 2
The protocol of this group (n=8) was identical to that of group 1, except that coronary microembolization was replaced by placebo, ie, intracoronary injection of 1 mL of vehicle.
Group 3
Following baseline measurements of systemic hemodynamics and regional myocardial blood flow, TNF-
antibodies were slowly infused intracoronarily in group 3 (n=4). Thirty minutes later, coronary microembolization was induced and this protocol was then identical to that of group 1.
Group 4
Except for the replacement of coronary microembolization by intracoronary injection of 1 mL vehicle, the protocol of this group (n=4) was identical to that of group 3.
To exclude an indirect protective effect of TNF-
through reduced contractile function before ischemia/reperfusion, we performed 4 additional experiments in which the myocardial dysfunction observed after coronary microembolization was matched by graded intracoronary infusion of thiopental over 6 hours. Thereafter, an ischemia/reperfusion protocol identical to that of groups 1 to 4 was performed. The concentration of thiopental in the coronary blood ranged from 5 to 70 µg/mL. The total amount of thiopental infused over 6 hours was 180±55 mg.
Data Analysis and Statistics
Data are reported as mean values±SEM. Systemic hemodynamics, regional myocardial function, subendocardial blood flow at 5 minutes of ischemia, area at risk, infarct size, and TNF-
tissue concentrations were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA (microembolization versus placebo, with or without TNF-
antibodies). To account for interindividual differences of regional myocardial function at baseline, all values were normalized to baseline equal 100% before further analysis. Fishers least-significant difference tests were used for post hoc comparisons. Linear regressions between subendocardial blood flow and infarct size in groups 1 and 2 were compared by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). A probability value less than 0.05 was taken to indicate a significant difference. Because the additional experiments to exclude indirect protection by TNF-
through prolonged myocardial dysfunction were performed as separate controls and not randomized, they were not included in the 2-way ANOVA and statistical comparison.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
antibodies attenuated the progressive dysfunction following coronary microembolization in group 3 (systolic wall thickening of the anterior wall at 6 hours, 77±5% of baseline; P<0.05 versus group 1). In group 4, the pretreatment with TNF-
antibodies had no influence on the time course of anterior systolic wall thickening (at 6 hours, 90±8% of baseline; Figure 1). With the onset of the sustained ischemia, anterior systolic wall thickening was reduced in all groups (Table).
|
|
In group 1, the tissue concentration of TNF-
was increased to 66±21 pg/g wet weight in the microembolized anterior wall compared with 12±11 pg/g wet weight in remote control myocardium (P<0.05). Such increase of TNF-
was not observed in group 2 (anterior wall: 21±10 pg/g wet weight versus remote area: 7±4 pg/g wet weight).
The area at risk and the subendocardial blood flow at 5 minutes of ischemia were comparable among all groups (Figure 2). The infarct size resulting from 90 minutes of ischemia and 2 hours of reperfusion was reduced to 18±4% of the area at risk in group 1 with prior coronary microembolization, as compared with 33±4% in group 2 with prior placebo (Figure 2). The pretreatment with TNF-
antibodies abolished the infarct size reduction by coronary microembolization (group 3: 29±3%). The TNF-
antibodies per se had no effect on infarct size (group 4: 35±5%). With coronary microembolization, the relationship between infarct size and subendocardial blood flow was shifted downward, reflecting smaller infarct size for any given subendocardial blood flow (P<0.05 ANCOVA; Figure 3).
|
|
In 4 additional experiments with gradually increasing thiopental infusion, regional myocardial function was decreased from 38.5±8.6% to 25.0±5.6%, ie, to 65±0.1% of baseline. Subendocardial blood flow during ischemia was 0.032±0.009 mL/min per gram, and infarct size was 31±5% of the area at risk.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Apart from an immediate decrease in coronary blood flow with subsequent reactive hyperemia and a transient contractile dysfunction, the major consequence of coronary microembolization is the development of multiple microinfarcts. Although the aggregate amount of infarction is small (<5% of the microembolized myocardium in our experimental studies in dogs and pigs8,9,11), these microinfarcts initiate a typical inflammatory response, characterized by increased myocardial TNF-
expression and leukocyte infiltration.8,11,21 The increased TNF-
expression is an autocrine/paracrine response of viable cardiomyocytes surrounding the microinfarcts, possibly mediated by local shear stress between contracting and noncontracting, infarcted myocardium.8 The increasing tissue concentration of TNF-
is causal for the resulting progressive myocardial dysfunction.811,22
The typical long-term consequences of coronary microembolization, increased levels of TNF-
in the microembolized myocardium and progressive myocardial dysfunction, were confirmed in group 1 of the present study. In the placebo animals of group 2, the myocardial concentration of TNF-
and contractile function remained unchanged. Slightly higher levels of TNF-
were observed in the anterior than in the remote posterior wall, possibly as a result of the extracorporeal perfusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery.23
However, TNF-
is not only a negative inotrope, as reflected by the progressive contractile dysfunction. It can also protect against myocardial infarction. Pretreatment with TNF-
mimics preconditioning in mice14 and isolated rat13,24 and rabbit15 hearts; in TNF-
knockout mice, the endogenous protection against infarction by acute14 or delayed16 ischemic preconditioning is abrogated. Such bidirectional effects of TNF-
are typically attributed to concentration- or site-specific effects.25,26 Somewhat in contrast, we have now studied the bidirectional (negative inotropic versus cardioprotective) action of one and the same TNF-
expression in the same experimental model, which mimics a realistic scenario of an acute coronary syndrome, and with the same target, ie, cardiomyocytes.
Infarct size after 90 minutes of ischemia and 2 hours of reperfusion was determined by TTC staining and served as the major end point of the present study. Under conditions of some residual blood flow during ischemia, as in the present study, it is a major determinant of final infarct size and must be taken into account.27 Therefore, we analyzed not only infarct size but also the relationship between infarct size and subendocardial blood flow during sustained ischemia as a more specific end point of cardiomyocyte protection. The major finding of the present study is that the myocardium is indeed protected against infarction at 6 hours after coronary microembolization. Infarct size was reduced almost by 50%, although coronary microembolization per se is expected to increase infarct size by approximately 5%.11 The observed protection was a direct effect of TNF-
per se and not an indirect protection secondary to reduced contractile function before ischemia/reperfusion, because thiopental induced almost identical dysfunction but no reduction in infarct size.
The pretreatment with the neutralizing TNF-
antibodies before coronary microembolization attenuated not only the progressive myocardial dysfunction, as already observed in dogs,8 but also abolished the infarct size reduction by coronary microembolization, establishing that increased TNF-
is causal both for contractile dysfunction and protection against infarction. Although this confirms previous observations that TNF-
can protect the myocardium from ischemia/reperfusion injury,13,14 our data are in contrast to other observations from our own and other laboratories. The role of TNF-
for infarct size after ischemia/reperfusion is controversial in mice,16,28 and in rabbits, the neutralization of TNF-
by TNF-
antibodies was associated with reduced infarct size after acute ischemia/reperfusion.29,30 A protective effect was not observed in the present study in the pigs of group 4. The attribution of such discrepancy to potential species differences is not really satisfying. An alternative explanation comes from model differences that result in differences of TNF-
concentrations. In fact, in the mice and rabbit studies, ischemia was induced by complete occlusion of a coronary artery, whereas in our present preparation, residual blood flow provided a continuous washout. Protection by infusion of exogenous TNF-
also requires a mandatory washout phase before the sustained ischemia, and the magnitude of infarct size reduction largely depends on the dose of TNF-
.13 The protective effect of TNF-
was only observed at a lower dose, and further increasing doses of TNF-
attenuated the infarct size reduction.13 A similar link between low-dose TNF-
and cardioprotection was recently reported. Hyperoxic exposure of mice induced a mild pulmonary inflammation with an increased TNF-
concentration. Increases in circulating serum TNF-
levels were not detected, possibly because of concentrations below the detection limit. Again, in these mice infarct size after ischemia/reperfusion was reduced, and this effect was abolished in TNF-
knockouts.31
Apart from the causal role of TNF-
in progressive myocardial dysfunction and delayed protection against infarction following coronary microembolization, there are further similarities in the signal transduction cascade. Myocardial protection by exogenous TNF-
depends on a sphingolipid signaling pathway. The ceramidase inhibitor N-oleoyl ethanolamine abolishes TNF-
preconditioning, and ceramide or sphingosine 1-phosphate mimic TNF-
protection.13 Similarly, for the microembolization-induced progressive myocardial dysfunction, we have identified a signal transduction cascade with nitric oxide upstream and sphingosine downstream of TNF-
. N-Oleoyl ethanolamine given before coronary microembolization prevented the progressive myocardial dysfunction, despite an increased concentration of TNF-
in the myocardium.9
In a more recent study, Lecour et al also report that free radicals are involved in TNF-
-induced cardioprotection. With TNF-
infusion, the formation of free radicals, as measured by electron spin resonance, was increased and the infarct size reduction by exogenous TNF-
was abolished by the antioxidant N-2-mercaptopropinyl glycine.24 With coronary microembolization in pigs, we have recently reported that in microembolized myocardium tropomyosin is oxidatively modified by formation of disulfide cross bridges and that the amount of disulfide cross bridges correlates to the degree of myocardial dysfunction at 6 hours after coronary microembolization. The oxidative modification of contractile proteins was attributed to free radicals because scavenging free radicals with ascorbic acid largely attenuated both the tropomyosin oxidation and myocardial dysfunction.10 Again, free radicals in the heart act in a dose-dependent bidirectional action. Small amounts of free radicals may serve a signaling function and result in cardioprotection,32,33 whereas larger amounts result in myocardial damage.34 In the scenario of ischemia/reperfusion, small amounts of free radicals are important signaling elements of acute ischemic preconditioning,32,33 whereas large amounts of free radicals cause stunning35 and cell death.36
We conclude that although coronary microembolization is a deleterious event that may occur spontaneously in patients with unstable coronary plaques or iatrogenically during percutaneous interventions, it also exerts a beneficial effect. When microembolized myocardium is subjected to ischemia/reperfusion after several hours, it is protected against infarction. This delayed protection by coronary microembolization is mediated by TNF-
.
The observation of a bidirectional role of TNF-
may provide a mechanistic explanation for the divergent clinical data on targeted anti-TNF-
therapy in patients with heart failure. In agreement with the observed improvement in contractile function with TNF-
antibodies in the present study, ventricular function was improved by a soluble TNF-
receptor that binds and inactivates TNF-
in an initial trial in a small group of patients with heart failure.37 Subsequent studies in more patients either did not confirm an improvement in clinical status38 or even reported an increased mortality39 with anti-TNF-
therapy, possibly reflecting the loss of TNF-
related protection.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant He 1320/14-1).
Disclosures
None.
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Falk E. Plaque rupture with severe pre-existing stenosis precipitating coronary thrombosis. Characteristics of coronary atherosclerotic plaques underlying fatal occlusive thrombi. Br Heart J. 1983; 50: 127134.
3. Falk E. Unstable angina with fatal outcome: dynamic coronary thrombosis leading to infarction and/or sudden death. Autopsy evidence of recurrent mural thrombosis with peripheral embolization culminating in total vascular occlusion. Circulation. 1985; 71: 699708.
4. Davies MJ, Thomas AC, Knapman PA, Hangartner JR. Intramyocardial platelet aggregation in patients with unstable angina suffering sudden ischemic cardiac death. Circulation. 1986; 73: 418427.
5. Hori M, Inoue M, Kitakaze M, Koretsune Y, Iwai K, Tamai J, Ito H, Kitabatake A, Sato T, Kamada T. Role of adenosine in hyperemic response of coronary blood flow in microcirculation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 1986; 250: H509H518.
6. Skyschally A, Schulz R, Erbel R, Heusch G. Reduced coronary and inotropic reserves with coronary microembolization. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002; 282: H611H614.
7. Dörge H, Neumann T, Behrends M, Skyschally A, Schulz R, Kasper C, Erbel R, Heusch G. Perfusion-contraction mismatch with coronary microvascular obstruction: role of inflammation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000; 279: H2587H2592.
8. Dörge H, Schulz R, Belosjorow S, Post H, van de Sand A, Konietzka I, Frede S, Hartung T, Vinten-Johansen J, Youker KA, Entman ML, Erbel R, Heusch G. Coronary microembolization: the role of TNF-
in contractile dysfunction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2002; 34: 5162.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Thielmann M, Dörge H, Martin C, Belosjorow S, Schwanke U, van de Sand A, Konietzka I, Büchert A, Krüger A, Schulz R, Heusch G. Myocardial dysfunction with coronary microembolization: signal transduction through a sequence of nitric oxide, tumor necrosis factor-
and sphingosine. Circ Res. 2002; 90: 807813.
10. Canton M, Skyschally A, Menabo R, Boengler K, Gres P, Schulz R, Haude M, Erbel R, Di Lisa F, Heusch G. Oxidative modification of tropomyosin and myocardial dysfunction following coronary microembolization. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 875881.
11. Skyschally A, Schulz R, Gres P, Konietzka I, Martin C, Haude M, Erbel R, Heusch G. Coronary microembolization does not induce acute preconditioning against infarction in pigs - the role of adenosine. Cardiovasc Res. 2004; 63: 313322.
12. Skyschally A, Gres P, Heusch G, Martin C, Haude M, Erbel R, Schulz R. Preinfarction angina: no interference of coronary microembolization with acute ischemic preconditioning. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2005; 39: 355361.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Lecour S, Smith RM, Woodward B, Opie LH, Rochette L, Sack MN. Identification of a novel role for sphingolipid signaling in TNF-
and ischemic preconditioning mediated cardioprotection. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2002; 34: 509518.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Smith RM, Suleman N, McCarthy J, Sack MN. Classic ischemic but not pharmacologic preconditioning is abrogated following genetic ablation of the TNF-
gene. Cardiovasc Res. 2002; 55: 553560.
15. Ichikawa Y, Miura T, Nakano A, Miki T, Nakamura Y, Tsuchihashi K, Shimamoto K. The role of ADAM protease in the tyrosine kinase-mediated trigger mechanism of ischemic preconditioning. Cardiovasc Res. 2004; 62: 167175.
16. Dawn B, Guo Y, Rezazadeh A, Wang O-L, Stein AB, Hunt G, Varma J, Xuan Y-T, Wu W-J, Tan W, Zhu X, Bolli R. Tumor necrosis factor-
does not modulate ischemia/reperfusion injury in naive myocardium but is essential for the development of late preconditioning. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2004; 37: 5161.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Yamashita N, Hoshida S, Otsu K, Taniguchi N, Kuzuya T, Hori M. The involvement of cytokines in the second window of ischaemic preconditioning. Br J Pharmacol. 2000; 131: 415422.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Schulz R, Post H, Vahlhaus C, Heusch G. Ischemic preconditioning in pigs: a graded phenomenon. Its relation to adenosine and bradykinin. Circulation. 1998; 98: 10221029.
19. Erbel R, Heusch G. Brief review: coronary microembolization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 2224.
20. Rioufol G, Gilard M, Finet G, Ginon I, Boscht J, André-Fouet X. Evolution of spontaneous atherosclerotic plaque rupture with medical therapy. Long-term follow-up with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2004; 110: 28752880.
21. Arras M, Strasser R, Mohri M, Doll R, Eckert P, Schaper W, Schaper J. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha is expressed by monocytes/macrophages following cardiac microembolization and is antagonized by cyclosporine. Basic Res Cardiol. 1998; 93: 97107.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Skyschally A, Haude M, Dörge H, Thielmann M, Duschin A, van de Sand A, Konietzka I, Büchert A, Aker S, Massoudy P, Schulz R, Erbel R, Heusch G. Glucocorticoid treatment prevents progressive myocardial dysfunction resulting from experimental coronary microembolization. Circulation. 2004; 109: 23372342.
23. Liakopoulos OJ, Mühlfeld C, Koschinsky M, Coulibaly MO, Schöndube FA, Dörge H. Progressive loss of myocardial contractile function despite unimpaired coronary blood flow after cardiac surgery. Basic Res Cardiol. 2005; 100: 7583.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Lecour S, Rochette L, Opie L. Free radicals trigger TNF-
-induced cardioprotection. Cardiovasc Res. 2005; 65: 239243.
25. Sack MN. Tumor necrosis factor-
in cardiovascular biology and the potential role for anti-tumor necrosis factor-
therapy in heart disease. Pharmacol Ther. 2002; 94: 123135.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Schulz R, Aker S, Belosjorow S, Heusch G. TNF-
in ischemia/reperfusion injury and heart failure. Basic Res Cardiol. 2004; 99: 811.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Reimer KA, Jennings RB, Cobb FR, Murdock RH, Greenfield JC Jr, Becker LC, Bulkley BH, Hutchins GM, Schwartz RP Jr, Bailey KR, Passamani ER. Animal models for protecting ischemic myocardium: results of the NHLBI cooperative study. Comparison of unconscious and conscious dog models. Circ Res. 1985; 56: 651665.
28. Maekawa N, Wada H, Kanda T, Niwa T, Yamada Y, Saito K, Fujiwara H, Sekikawa K, Seishima M. Improved myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice lacking tumor necrosis factor-
. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 12291235.
29. Li D, Zhao L, Liu M, Du X, Ding W, Zhang J, Mehta JL. Kinetics of tumor necrosis factor
in plasma and the cardioprotective effect of a monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor
in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 1999; 137: 11451152.[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Belosjorow S, Bolle I, Duschin A, Heusch G, Schulz R. TNF-
antibodies are as effective as ischemic preconditioning in reducing infarct size in rabbits. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003; 284: H927H930.
31. Labruto F, Yang J, Vaage J, Valen G. Role of tumor necrosis factor alpha and its receptor I in preconditioning by hyperoxia. Basic Res Cardiol. 2005; 100: 198207.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Pain T, Yang X-M, Critz SD, Yue Y, Nakano A, Liu GS, Heusch G, Cohen MV, Downey JM. Opening of mitochondrial KATP channels triggers the preconditioned state by generating free radicals. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 460466.
33. Skyschally A, Schulz R, Gres P, Korth H-G, Heusch G. Attenuation of ischemic preconditioning in pigs by scavenging of free oxyradicals with ascorbic acid. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003; 284: H698H703.
34. Downey JM. Free radicals and their involvement during long-term myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Annu Rev Physiol. 1990; 52: 487504.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Bolli R, Marban E. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of myocardial stunning. Physiol Rev. 1999; 70: 609634.
36. Akao M, ORourke B, Teshima Y, Seharaseyon J, Marban E. Mechanistically distinct steps in the mitochondrial death pathway triggered by oxidative stress in cardiac myocytes. Circ Res. 2003; 92: 186194.
37. Bozkurt B, Torre-Amione G, Smith Warren M, Whitmore J, Soran OZ, Feldman AM, Mann DL. Results of targeted anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy with etanercept (ENBREL) in patients with advanced heart failure. Circulation. 2001; 103: 10441047.
38. Mann DL, McMurray JJV, Packer M, Swedberg K, Borer JS, Colucci WS, Dijan J, Drexler H, Feldman A, Kober L, Krum H, Liu P, Nieminen M, Tavazzi L, van Veldhuisen DJ, Waldenstrom A, Warren M, Westheim A, Zannad F, Fleming T. Targeted anticytokine therapy in patients with chronic heart failure. Results of the randomized etanercept worldwide evaluation (RENEWAL). Circulation. 2004; 109: 15941602.
39. Chung ES, Packer M, Hung K, Lo KH, Fasanmade AA, Willerson JT. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot trial of infliximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor-
, in patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure: results of the anti-TNF Therapy Against Congestive Heart Failure (ATTACH) trial. Circulation. 2003; 107: 31333140.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Musiolik, P. van Caster, A. Skyschally, K. Boengler, P. Gres, R. Schulz, and G. Heusch Reduction of infarct size by gentle reperfusion without activation of reperfusion injury salvage kinases in pigs Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2010; 85(1): 110 - 117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Heusch, P. Kleinbongard, D. Bose, B. Levkau, M. Haude, R. Schulz, and R. Erbel Coronary Microembolization: From Bedside to Bench and Back to Bedside Circulation, November 3, 2009; 120(18): 1822 - 1836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Heusch No RISK, no ... cardioprotection? A critical perspective Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2009; 84(2): 173 - 175. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Jobe, G. C. Melendez, S. P. Levick, Y. Du, G. L. Brower, and J. S. Janicki TNF-{alpha} inhibition attenuates adverse myocardial remodeling in a rat model of volume overload Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2009; 297(4): H1462 - H1468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Heusch and R. Schulz Neglect of the coronary circulation: some critical remarks on problems in the translation of cardioprotection Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2009; 84(1): 11 - 14. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Boengler, R. Schulz, and G. Heusch Loss of cardioprotection with ageing Cardiovasc Res, July 15, 2009; 83(2): 247 - 261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hamid, Y. Gu, R. V. Ortines, C. Bhattacharya, G. Wang, Y.-T. Xuan, and S. D. Prabhu Divergent Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-Related Remodeling Responses in Heart Failure: Role of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B and Inflammatory Activation Circulation, March 17, 2009; 119(10): 1386 - 1397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Schulz and G. Heusch Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} and Its Receptors 1 and 2: Yin and Yang in Myocardial Infarction? Circulation, March 17, 2009; 119(10): 1355 - 1357. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Carlsson, M. Wilson, A. J. Martin, and M. Saeed Myocardial Microinfarction after Coronary Microembolization in Swine: MR Imaging Characterization Radiology, March 1, 2009; 250(3): 703 - 713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Breuckmann, K. Nassenstein, C. Bucher, I. Konietzka, G. Kaiser, T. Konorza, C. Naber, A. Skyschally, P. Gres, G. Heusch, et al. Systematic analysis of functional and structural changes after coronary microembolization: a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., February 1, 2009; 2(2): 121 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Skyschally, P. van Caster, K. Boengler, P. Gres, J. Musiolik, D. Schilawa, R. Schulz, and G. Heusch Ischemic Postconditioning in Pigs: No Causal Role for RISK Activation Circ. Res., January 2, 2009; 104(1): 15 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. R. Heinzel, P. Gres, K. Boengler, A. Duschin, I. Konietzka, T. Rassaf, J. Snedovskaya, S. Meyer, A. Skyschally, M. Kelm, et al. Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression and Cardiomyocyte Dysfunction During Sustained Moderate Ischemia in Pigs Circ. Res., November 7, 2008; 103(10): 1120 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-T. Shen, C. Depre, L. Yan, J. Y. Park, B. Tian, K. Jain, L. Chen, Y. Zhang, R. K. Kudej, X. Zhao, et al. Repetitive Ischemia by Coronary Stenosis Induces a Novel Window of Ischemic Preconditioning Circulation, November 4, 2008; 118(19): 1961 - 1969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Timmers, J. P.G. Sluijter, J. K. van Keulen, I. E. Hoefer, M. G.J. Nederhoff, M.-J. Goumans, P. A. Doevendans, C. J.A. van Echteld, J. A. Joles, P. H. Quax, et al. Toll-Like Receptor 4 Mediates Maladaptive Left Ventricular Remodeling and Impairs Cardiac Function After Myocardial Infarction Circ. Res., February 1, 2008; 102(2): 257 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Research Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2007 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |